data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72bcf/72bcf38aca0f93b9e9c211111b22125aadf78962" alt="企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第7、8章 道德决策制定:工作场所中的技术和隐私;营销伦理_第1页"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e5d4/4e5d49b7963231ffe0e84b0c2aecd297faa04f80" alt="企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第7、8章 道德决策制定:工作场所中的技术和隐私;营销伦理_第2页"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70576/70576cd9cc1a93feaf1507e5e359ee009bc59e38" alt="企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第7、8章 道德决策制定:工作场所中的技术和隐私;营销伦理_第3页"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eb99/1eb99a2d9285c500d33525a5241f75a8070cf231" alt="企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第7、8章 道德决策制定:工作场所中的技术和隐私;营销伦理_第4页"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32496/32496a4925485ad119bb812e4f48b27f2597c547" alt="企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第7、8章 道德决策制定:工作场所中的技术和隐私;营销伦理_第5页"
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
ChapterSeven:EthicalDecisionMaking:TechnologyandPrivacyintheWorkplaceCopyright©2021McGraw-HillEducation.Allrightsreserved.NoreproductionordistributionwithoutthepriorwrittenconsentofMcGraw-HillEducation.ChapterObjectives1Afterreadingthischapter,youwillbeableto:Explainanddistinguishthetwodefinitionsofprivacy.Describetheethicalsourcesofprivacyasafundamentalvalue.Identifythelegalsourcesofprivacyprotection,includingtheconceptofa“reasonableexpectationofprivacy.”Discussrecentdevelopmentsinconnectionwithemployeemonitoring.Identifyandexplaintherisksinvolvedinafailuretounderstandtheimplicationsoftechnologyanditsuse.Enumeratethereasonswhyemployerschoosetomonitoremployees’work.ChapterObjectives2Afterreadingthischapter,youwillbeableto:Discusstheethicsofmonitoringasitappliestodrugtesting.Discusstheethicsofmonitoringasitappliestopolygraphs,genetictesting,andotherformsofsurveillance.Explaintheinterestsofanemployerinregulatinganemployee’sactivitiesoutsideofwork.Discusstheimplicationsofworldevents,likerecentimmigrationpolicychanges,onbusinessdecisionsaboutprivacy.EthicalDecisionMakingThis“telephone”hastoomanyshortcomingstobeseriouslyconsideredasameansofcommunication.Thedeviceisinherentlyofnovaluetous.WesternUnionInternalMemo,1876Introduction1
Thischapterreviewssomekeyethicalissuesoftechnologyandprivacy,withafocusonprivacyintheworkplace.Conflictarisesthroughtheregulationofpersonalactivitiesorpersonalchoices,orthroughvariousformsofmonitoring.Chaptersevenexplorestheoriginsoftherighttoprivacyandthelegalandethicallimitationsonthatright.Introduction2Nextcomesmonitoringemployeeperformanceandtheethicalissuesfrompotentialtechnologicalinvasionsofprivacy.Thechapterthenconnectstheissuesoftechnologyandprivacytothebalanceofrightsandresponsibilitiesbetweenemployersandemployees.TheRighttoPrivacyPrivacyisasurprisinglyvagueanddisputedvalueincontemporarysociety.Callsforgreaterprotectionofprivacyrightsincreasedwiththeincreasedusedofcomputers.Privacyrights:Thelegalandethicalsourcesofprotectionforprivacyinpersonaldata.Thereiswidespreadconfusiononthenature,extent,andvalueofprivacy.DefiningPrivacyTwogeneralandconnectedunderstandingsofprivacy.Privacyistherighttobe"leftalone"withinapersonalzoneofsolitude.Privacyistherighttocontrolinformationaboutoneself.Privacyisimportantasitestablishestheboundarybetweenindividualsanddefinesone’sindividuality.Manypeoplebelievetherighttobe"leftalone"istoobroadandnotfeasibleintheworkplace.Therefore,thecontrolofpersonalinformationisabetterdefinition.Arightofprivacyimpliescontrolofallpersonalinformation.Perhapsthechoiceoflimitationorcontrolisone’ssenseofprivacy.EthicalSourcesofaRighttoPrivacy1Therighttoprivacyisfoundedintheindividual’sfundamentalrighttoautonomy.Thisrightisrestrictedbyaboundaryofreciprocalobligation.Reciprocalobligation:Whenanindividualexpectsrespectforhisorherpersonalautonomy,heorshehasareciprocalobligationtorespecttheautonomyofothers.Intheworkplace,reciprocalobligationimpliesthat:Anemployeehasanobligationtorespectthegoalsandpropertyoftheemployer.Theemployerhasareciprocalobligationtorespecttherightsoftheemployee,includingtherighttoprivacy.EthicalSourcesofaRighttoPrivacy2Thereisanapproachtoethicalanalysisthatseekstodifferentiatebetween:Thosevaluesthatarefundamentalacrosscultureandtheory,hypernorms.Thosevaluesthataredeterminedwithinmoralfreespaceandarenothypernorms.Individualprivacyisatthecoreofmanyofthebasicminimalrightsorhypernorms.Thevalueofprivacytocivilizedsocietyisasgreatasthevalueofthevarioushypernormstocivilizedexistence.Thefailuretoprotectprivacymayleadtoaninabilitytoprotectpersonalfreedomandautonomy.EthicalSourcesofaRighttoPrivacy3Legalanalysisofprivacyusingpropertyrightsperspectiveyieldsadditionalinsight."Property"isanindividual’slifeandallnon-procreativederivativesofherorhislife.Derivativesmayincludethoughtsandideas,aswellaspersonalinformation.Propertyrightsmeansdeterminingwhomaintainscontrolovertangiblesandintangibles,includingpersonalinformation.Whydoweassumeanindividualhasunfetteredrightstohisorherpersonalinformation?Privatepropertyrightsdependontheexistenceandenforcementofasetofrulesthatdefinewhohasarighttoundertakewhichactivitiesontheirowninitiativeandhowthereturnsfromthoseactivitieswillbeallocated.Thelegalrulesremainvague.LegalSourcesofaRighttoPrivacy1Privacycanbelegallyprotectedinthreeways:Bytheconstitution,Bystatutes,and,Bythecommonlaw.TheConstitution’sFourthAmendmentprotectionagainstunreasonablesearchandseizureappliestothepublic-sectorworkplace.LegalSourcesofaRighttoPrivacy2TheElectronicCommunicationsPrivacyAct(ECPA)of1986prohibitsunauthorizedaccessofstoredcommunications.ECPAimpactselectronicmonitoringonlybythirdpartiesandnotbyemployersSomestatesusestatutesbutapplicationtoprivate-sectororganizationsislimited,uncertain,ornotincludedatall.Intrusionintoseclusionviolationoccurswhensomeoneintentionallyintrudesontheprivateaffairsofanotherwhentheintrusionwouldbehighlyoffensivetoareasonableperson.LegalSourcesofaRighttoPrivacy3Manyrecentcourtdecisionswithregardtomonitoringseemtodependonwhethertheworkerhadnoticethatthemonitoringmightoccur.Thebasisforfindinganinvasionofprivacyisoftentheemployee’slegitimateandreasonableexpectationofprivacy.Iftheemployeehasactualnotice,thentheretrulyisnorealexpectationofprivacy.Thecompanyisallowedtomonitorevenwhenitpromisesnottomonitor.LegalSourcesofaRighttoPrivacy4ConnecticutandDelawarearetheonlytwostatesthatrequireemployerstonotifyworkerswhentheyarebeingmonitored.2019:Twenty-sixstates(plusGuam)prohibitemployersfromobtainingsocialmediapasswordsfromprospectiveorcurrentemployees.Table7.1:LegalStatusofEmployeeMonitoring1MethodsofCommunicationStatusTelephonecalls Monitoringispermittedinconnectionwithqualitycontrol.Noticetothepartiesonthecallisoftenrequiredbystatelaw,thoughfederallawallowsemployerstomonitorworkcallswithoutnotice.Iftheemployerrealizesthatthecallispersonal,monitoringmustceaseimmediately. Emailmessages Undermostcircumstances,employersmaymonitoremployeeemails.Eveninsituationswheretheemployerclaimsthatitwillnot,itsrighttomonitorhasbeenupheld.However,wheretheemployee’sreasonableexpectationofprivacyisincreased(suchasapassword-protectedaccount),thismayimpactthecourt’sdecision. Table7.1:LegalStatusofEmployeeMonitoring2MethodsofCommunicationStatusVoice-mail-systemmessages Thoughnotyetcompletelysettled,thelawhereappearstobesimilartotheanalysisofemailmessages. InternetuseWheretheemployerhasprovidedtheequipmentand/oraccesstotheinternet,theemployermaytrack,block,orreviewinternetuse.
GlobalApplications1PrivacyprotectionismoredifficultgiventheimplicationsoftheEuropeanUnion’sGeneralDataProtectionRegulation(GDPR).Providesthatpersonalinformationcannotbecollectedorsharedbycompanieswithoutindividuals’permission.Informationaboutwhoisusingthedataandforwhatpurposeitisbeingcollectedmustbeprovidedinaclear,easilyunderstandablemanner.Consumershavetherighttoreviewthedataandcorrectinaccuracies.GDPRincludesheavyregulatorypowersbyimposingheavyfinesforthosecompaniesthatbreaktheseregulations.UndertheGDPR,theEuropeanUniondoesnotallowthetransferofdataonitscitizensoutsideofthecountryunlessthecountryisdeemedtohaveadequatedataprivacylaws.TheEuropeanUnionPrivacyShield1UndertheEUPrivacyShield:WhenusingEuropeans’data,U.S.intelligenceserviceswillhavetoadheretothenewlimitsandoversightmechanism.TheU.S.StateDepartmentwillhavetoemployanewwatchdogtohandlecomplaintsaboutintelligence-relatedmatters.Companiesmustself-certifycompliancewiththePrivacyShieldanditsstatedprinciples.Certificationsmustberenewedannually.TheEuropeanUnionPrivacyShield2CompaniesmustpubliclydisplaytheirprivacypoliciesthatshowcompliancewithEUlaw.Companieswillhavetoresolvecomplaintswithin45daysofbeingfiled.Companieswillhavetoupdatetheirprivacypoliciestoexplainhowpeoplecanaccesstheseservices.CompanieswillfacemorerestrictionsonbeingabletoforwardEuropeans’personaldatatoothercompanies.GlobalApplications2Giventhenatureofthelegaluncertaintyorinstabilityconcerningthesechallengingareasofinformationgathering,perhapstheonlysourceofananswerisethics.Insummary.Employeeprivacyisviolatedwhenever:Employersinfringeuponpersonaldecisionsthatarenotrelevanttotheemploymentcontract–whetherthecontractisimpliedorexplicit.Personalinformationthatisnotrelevanttothatcontractiscollected,stored,orusedwithouttheinformedconsentoftheemployee.Further,becauseconsentplaysapivotalroleinthisunderstanding,theburdenofproofrestswiththeemployertoestablishtherelevancyofpersonaldecisionsandinformationatissue.EthicalDecisionMaking3Technologyisnothing.What’simportantisthatyouhaveafaithinpeople,thatthey’rebasicallygoodandsmart,andifyougivethemtools,they’lldowonderfulthingswiththem.SteveJobs,Chair,CEOandCo-FounderofAppleIncorporatedLinkingPrivacytotheEthicalUseofTechnologyNewtechnologychallengesprivacyinunimaginableways.Newtechnology,however,doesnotnecessarilyimpactourvaluejudgments.Butnewtechnologyinsteadprovidesnewwaystogathertheinformationonwhichtobasethem.Thelackoflegislationmeansworkplacedisputesbecomeamatterofcontractlaw.Doweneed"newethics"forthis"neweconomy"?No,becausethesamevaluesoneheldunderpreviouscircumstancesshouldpermeateandrelatetolatercircumstances.However,theperspectiveonebringstoeachexperienceisimpactedbytheunderstandinganduseofnewtechnology.InformationandPrivacy1Tomakeeffectivedecisions,businessesmustanticipatetheperceptionsoftheirstakeholders.Google’smottois:"Don’tbeevil."Yet,GooglecausedcontroversywithitsGmailprivacypolicy.Googleminesauser'semailcontentsandusestheinformationfortargetedadvertising.Itarguesthatusershave‘noreasonableexpectation’ofprivacy.Byfailingtofullycomprehendandplanforitsstakeholders’perceptionsoftheprograms,Googlebreachedethicalboundariesandalsosufferedpublicbacklash.InformationandPrivacy2Moralrequirementsthatneedtobeimposedoninformationiftechnologyisdependentoninformation.Truthfulnessandaccuracy.Thepersonprovidingtheinformationmustbetruthful.Respectforprivacy.Thereceiveroftheinformationmustuseethicallimitsofindividuals'privacy.Respectforpropertyandsafetyrights.Areasofpotentialvulnerability,includingnetworksecurity,sabotage,theft,andimpersonationareenhancedandmustthereforebeprotected.Accountability.Technologyallowsforanonymityrequiringgreaterpersonalresponsibilityandaccountability.ManagingEmployeesThroughMonitoring1Monitoringemployees’workisoneofthemostprevalentformsofinformationgatheringintheworkplace.Technologyaffordsaneffective,lowcostmonitoringability.SurveyconductedbytheAmericanAcademyofManagementfoundthatnearly80%oflargecompaniesgatherinformationthroughemailmonitoringandalsointernetusemonitoring.ManagingEmployeesThroughMonitoring2Employeeshavecometoexpectthattheiremailsarethepropertyof—oratleastsubjecttosearchby—theiremployers.Internetusemonitoringisevolvingassocialmediagrows.Employersareconcernedaboutemployeeproductivityandwhethertheiremployeesmaybringtoomuchoftheirpersonallivestotheworkplace.Employeemonitoringchallengesbodyautonomybyusingbiotrackingtechnologyandbadgesthatmonitorthetone,gender,andlivelocationofemployees.Theseapplicationscanbecomeintrusiveforemployees.ManagingEmployeesThroughMonitoring3Whenmanaginginformation,ethicalissuesmaynotbeobvious.Whenwedonotcompletelyunderstandthetechnologyinvolved,wemightnotunderstandtheethicalimplicationsofourdecisions.Welosetheabilitytoprotectourowninformationeffectivelybecausewemaynotunderstand:Theimpactonourautonomy,Thecontrolofourinformation,Ourreciprocalobligations,orWhatmightbebestforourpersonalexistence.ManagingEmployeesThroughMonitoring4Ethicalissuesareenhancedbytheknowledgegapexistingbetweenpeoplewhodounderstandthetechnologyandotherswhoareunabletoprotectthemselvesbecausetheydonotunderstand.Technologyallowsforaccesstoinformationthatwasneverbeforepossible.Itcanbedonewithouttherecipient'sknowledgeorevenunintentionally.Technologymeansweareseldomoutoftheboundariesofourworkplace.Ourtotalaccessibilitycreatesnewexpectations,andthereforeconflicts.ManagingEmployeesThroughMonitoring5Continuoustechnologicalaccessibilityblursthelinesbetweenpersonalandprofessionallives.Employeesmightnotappreciate24by7accessibilitybecauseoftheirinterestinsocialmediaandbeingcaughtactiveonit.Technologyresultsinmorefacelesscontacts.E-mail,texting,andsocialmediapostsdonotcarrythesameweightas'puttingitinwriting.'Giventheeaseandinformalityofelectroniccommunicationwearemorecarelesswithourcommunications.WhyDoFirmsMonitorTechnologyUsage?1Employersneedtomanagetheirworkplacesto:Placeworkersinappropriatepositions,Toensurecompliancewithaffirmativeactionrequirements,orToadministerworkplacebenefits.Allowsmanagerstoensureeffectiveperformancebypreventinglostproductivityduetoinappropriatetechnologyuseiftheemployeeisawarethathewillbemonitored.WhyDoFirmsMonitorTechnologyUsage?2Monitoringoffersemployersamethodtoprotectitsotherresources.Protectsproprietaryinformationandguardsagainsttheft.Protectstheirequipmentandbandwidth.Protectsagainstlegalliability.ManagingEmployeesThroughMonitoring28%ofemployershavefiredworkersforusingtheInternetduringtheworkdayfornon-work-relatedactivity.18%havefiredworkersbecauseofpostsonsocialmediaRacist,sexist,orinappropriatepostsorcomments.MonitoringEmployeesThroughDrugTesting1Employershavehadalonghistoryofmonitoringbydrugtestingthanbytechnologymonitoring.Theemployerhasastrongargumentinfavorofdrugtestingbasedonthelaw.Theemployerwouldbeheldresponsibleforlegalviolationsthatitsemployeescommitandhence,theirinterestincontrollingeveryaspectincreases.Employeesmayarguethattheirdrugusageisrelevantonlyifitimpactstheirjobperformance.Thelegalizationofmarijuanainsomeplaceshasmadeforcomplicatedworkplacedilemmas.MonitoringEmployeesThroughDrugTesting2Courtsinseveralstateshaveruledthatanemployeetestingpositiveformarijuanamayprevailagainstanemployerundercertaincircumstances,eveniftheemployerisenforcingdrug-freeworkplacepolicies.Determiningwhentheuseoccurredisstillthedifficultquestiontoanswer.Employersincountrieswheremarijuanaislegalizedorwherepossessionispermittedmayprohibititsuseatworkandemployeesfrombeingatworkwhileimpaired.Therefore,employersmaytesttheirworkerstodetermineimpairment.MonitoringEmployeesThroughDrugTesting3Employersmightconducttestingonaregularbasisbasedoncharacteristicsrelatedtotheemployee'sjobperformanceandworkplacebehavior.ThesecharacteristicsareofferedbytheNationalCouncilonAlcoholismandDrugDependenceas“warningsignsofdruguse.”Testingoccursbothduringemploymentandalsopreemployment.Forthecompaniesthathavedrugtestingrequirements,therearelegalrealitiestoconsider.TheAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)prohibitsemployersfrominquiringaboutanemployee’suseofprescriptiondrugsunlesstheemployerhasareasonablebasisforbelievingthattheworkerposesasafetythreatorisunabletodohisorherjob.OtherFormsofMonitoring1Employersarelimitedintheircollectionofinformationthroughotherformsoftesting,suchaspolygraphsormedicaltests.MedicalinformationisprotectedbytheAmericanswithDisabilitiesActbutalsobytheHealthInsurancePortabilityandAccountabilityAct(HIPAA).HIPPAstipulatesthatemployerscannotuse"protectedhealthinformation"withoutpriorconsent.OtherFormsofMonitoring2Polygraphsanddrugtesting,physicalandelectronicsurveillance,third-partybackgroundchecks,andpsychologicaltestinghaveallbeenusedtogainemployeeinformation.Useofelectronicmonitoringandsurveillanceisincreasing.Wheremightthispracticeheadtowardinthefuture?Oneareasuretoprovidenewquestionsonprivacyisgenetictesting.TheGeneticInformationNon-DiscriminationAct(GINA)2008prohibitsdiscriminationbasedongeneticinformation.UnderGINA,yourgeneticinformationisalsoyourfamily’smedicalhistory.OtherFormsofMonitoring3GINAdoesprovideforexceptions.Anemployercancollectgeneticinformationto:ComplywiththeFamilyMedicalLeaveAct(FMLA).Monitorthebiologicaleffectsoftoxinsintheworkplace.Ifcollected,theinformationmayonlybereleasedundercertaincircumstances.EEOCissuedclarifyingguidelinesin2010thatincludea“safeharbor”liabilityexceptionforemployersthatinadvertentlyreceivegeneticinformationinresponsetoalawfulmedicalinquiry.EthicsandBusinessThingsdonotchange;wechange. HenryDavidThoreauBusinessReasonstoLimitMonitoringMonitoringmaycreateasuspiciousandhostileworkplace.Theemployerisneglectingakeystakeholder—theworker.Monitoringmayconstraineffectiveperformancesinceitcan:Causeincreasedstressandnegativelyimpactperformance.Causeinjuriessuchascarpaltunnelsyndrome.Leadtounhappy,disgruntledworkers.Employeesclaimthatmonitoringisaninherentinvasionofprivacythatviolatestheirfundamentalhumanrighttoprivacy.BalancingInterests1Monitoringcanbemademoreethicalorhumane.Hawthorneeffect:Notifyingworkerswhentheyarebeingmonitored.Eveniftheyareunabletoprepareinadvance,theemployeesareabletoensurethattheyareontheirbestbehaviorduringthosecalls.Workersarefoundtobemoreproductivebasedonthepsychologicalstimulusofbeingsingledout.Strivingtowardabalancethatrespectsindividualdignitywhilealsoholdingindividualsaccountablefortheirrolesintheorganization.Amonitoringprogramdevelopedaccordingtothemission,thenimplementedinamannerthatremainsaccountabletotheimpactedemployees,approachesthatbalance.ParametersforaMonitoringPolicyNomonitoringinprivateareas(Example:restrooms).Limitmonitoringtowithintheworkplace.Employeesshouldhaveaccesstoinformationgatheredduringmonitoring.Nosecretmonitoring–advancenoticerequired.Monitoringshouldonlyresultinattainingsomebusinessinterest.Employermayonlycollectjob-relatedinformation.Thereneedstobeadisclosureagreementregardingthemonitoring.Nodiscriminationbyemployersbasedonoff-workactivities.BalancingInterests2PhilosopherWilliamParentsuggestsweasksixquestionstodeterminewhetheractionsarejustifiableorhavethepotentialforaninvasionofprivacyorliberty.Forwhatpurposeistheundocumentedpersonalknowledgesought?Isthispurposealegitimateandimportantone?Istheknowledgesoughtthroughinvasionofprivacyrelevanttoitsjustifyingpurpose?Isinvasionofprivacytheonly,ortheleastoffensive,meansofobtainingtheknowledge?Whatrestrictionsorproceduralrestraintshavebeenplacedontheprivacy-invadingtechniques?Howwillthepersonalknowledgebeprotectedonceithasbeenacquired?RegulationofOff-WorkActs1Regulationofoff-workactivitiesisaninterestingissue,particularlyinat-willenvironments.Evenat-willemployersmustcomplywithavarietyofstatestatutes.Mostbusinessescannotdiscriminateagainstsmokersbutsomecompaniesencourageemployeestoquit.OnestateandsixU.S.citiesbandiscriminationonthebasisofweight.Lawsprotectingagainstdiscriminationbasedonmaritalstatusexistinjustunderhalfthestates.Notnecessarilyprotectedagainstactionbasedonwhotheymarried.Twenty-onestatesandtheDistrictofColumbiaprohibitemploymentdiscriminationonthebasisofsexualorientation.RegulationofOff-WorkActs2Moststatutesprovideforemployerdefenseforrulesthat:Arereasonablyandrationallyrelatedtotheemploymentactivitiesofaparticularemployee.Constitutea"bonafideoccupationalrequirement."Meaningarulethatisreasonablyrelatedtothatparticularposition.Arenecessarytoavoidaconflictofinterestortheappearanceofconflictofinterest.RegulationofOff-WorkActs3Thequestionofmonitoringemployeeonlinecommunicationwhileoffworkisrelevanttotechnologymonitoring.Ariseswithoutmuchlegalguidance.Demandssensitiveethicaldecisionmaking.Isitethicaltoseekoutonlineinformationprohibitedfromajobinterview,suchasreligion?Lawsvaryfromcountrytocountryandalsofromstatetostate.PrivacyRightsSinceSeptember11,200119/11hadamajorimpactonprivacywithintheU.S.andontheemploymentenvironment,inparticular.ThemostpublicizedmodificationwastheadoptionandimplementationoftheUnitingandStrengtheningAmericabyProvidingAppropriateToolsRequiredtoInterceptandObstructTerrorism(USAPATRIOT)Actof2001.Expandsstates'rightswithregardtoInternetsurveillance,includingworkplacesurveillancetechnology,andamendedtheElectronicCommunicationPrivacyAct.Grantsaccesstosensitivedatawithonlyacourtorderratherthanawarrantandimposescriminalpenaltiesforaidingterrorists.Newdisclosureregimeallowsincreasedsharingofinformationbetweengovernmentagenciestoincreaseprotection.PrivacyRightsSinceSeptember11,20012TitleTwoofthePATRIOTActprovidesforthefollowingenhancedsurveillanceprocedures:Expandsauthoritytointerceptwire,oral,andelectroniccommunicationsrelatedtoterrorism,computerfraud,andabuseoffenses.ProvidesrovingsurveillanceauthorityundertheForeignIntelligenceSurveillanceAct(FISA)of1978totrackindividuals.Allowsnationwideseizureofvoice-mailmessagespursuanttowarrants.Broadensthetypesofrecordsthatlawenforcementmayobtainfromelectronicserviceproviders.Permitsemergencydisclosureofelectroniccommunicationstoprotectlifeandlimb.Providesnationwideserviceofsearchwarrantsforelectronicevidence.PrivacyRightsSinceSeptember11,20013TheprovisionsunderthePATRIOTActallowthegovernmenttomonitoranyoneontheInternetbycontendingitis"relevant"toacriminalinvestigation.ThePATRIOTActcombatsmoneylaunderingorthefundingofterroristorcriminalactivitythroughcorporateactivityorotherwise.Financialinstitutionsmustnowreportsuspiciousactivitiesandkeeprecordofforeignnationalemployees.PrivacyRightsSinceSeptember11,20014ThePATRIOTActhasbeenreauthorizedthreetimes.Elementshavebeenamended,revised,andextendedbyseveraladditionalbills.ThePATRIOTActallowsforandreliesonrequestsfrombusinessestogatherinformation.However,itwasrevealedthattheNationalSecurityAgency(NSA)washarvestingcontactlists,searchingemailcontent,andtrackingandmappingcellphonelocations.Manyorganizationsnownotifyusersofrequestsforinformationpriortodisclosureunlessprohibitedbystatuteorcourtorder.ChapterEight:EthicsandMarketingCopyright©2021McGraw-HillEducation.Allrightsreserved.NoreproductionordistributionwithoutthepriorwrittenconsentofMcGraw-HillEducation.ChapterObjectives1Afterreadingthischapter,youwillbeableto:Applyanethicalframeworktomarketingissues.Describethethreekeyconcernsofethicalanalysisofmarketingissues.Describetwointerpretationsof"responsibility"andapplythemtothetopicofproductsafety.Explaincontractualstandardsforestablishingbusiness’sresponsibilitiesforsafeproducts.Articulatethetortstandardsforestablishingbusiness’sresponsibilitiesforsafeproducts.Analyzetheethicalargumentsforandagainststrictproductliability.Discusshowtoevaluatebothethicalandunethicalmeansbywhichtoinfluencepeoplethroughadvertising.ChapterObjectives2Afterreadingthischapter,youwillbeableto:Explaintheethicaljustificationforadvertising.Tracedebatesaboutadvertising’sinfluenceoncustomerautonomy.Distinguishethicalfromunethicaltargetmarketing,usingmarketingtovulnerablepopulationsasanexample.Discussbusiness’sresponsibilitiesfortheactivitiesofitssupplychain.EthicsandMarketing1Amagazineissimplyadevicetoinducepeopletoreadadvertising. JamesCollinsIntroduction1
Somebelievetheverypurposeofbusinessisfoundwithinthemarketingfunction.TheAmericanMarketingAssociationdefinesmarketinginawaythatechoesthestakeholdermodelofCSRinChapter5.AccordingtotheAMA,marketingis"anorganizationalfunctionandasetofprocessesforcreating,communicating,anddeliveringvaluetocustomersandformanagingcustomerrelationshipsinwaysthatbenefittheorganizationanditsstakeholders."Anexchangebetweenasellerandabuyeriscentraltothemarketeconomyandthecoreideabehindmarketing.Marketingethicsexaminestheresponsibilitiesassociatedwithbringingaproduc
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 江苏省苏州市2023-2024学年高二上学期期中考试地理试题(解析版)
- 2025至2030年中国新型建筑材料数据监测研究报告
- 2025年广东省广州市单招职业适应性测试题库必考题
- 机械制造技术基础 机械制造工程基础练习题学习课件
- 2024年二级建造师继续教育考核题及答案
- 2025至2030年中国快速集中熔解炉数据监测研究报告
- 人教版历史与社会七年级下册第七单元第二课《传媒的行程》教学设计
- 二零二五年度环境污染和解赔款协议
- 二零二五年度山地承包合同书:林业资源管理与保护合作协议
- 2025至2030年中国复合铝基润滑脂数据监测研究报告
- 国内外材料牌号对照
- 建设工程施工合同培训PPT(49页)
- 2010哈弗H5维修手册
- (完整版)NRS数字分级法评分表
- LY∕T 2780-2016 松疱锈病菌检疫技术规程
- 航空服务形体训练课程标准
- 项目部安全管理组织机构网络图GDAQ20102
- 一文看懂全部变电站电气主接线方式
- 苏科版四年级劳动技术下册教学计划
- 应答器报文定义《运基信号[2005]224号》
- 电网公司客户资产接收管理细则
评论
0/150
提交评论