科技写作和报告

科技写作和报告

WritingandPresentingfor

ComputerScience

Class1IntroductionOutlineWhypublish?PublicationVenuesCyclesofPublicationPublicationLayoutEthnicsReferee课程考核/wiki/Publish_or_perish"Publishorperish"

referstothepressureto

publish

workconstantlytofurtherorsustainacareer

in

academia.

PublishorperishPublishandflourishTheimportanceofpublicationsAcademiccareerdependsonpublicationlistYoungPhDgraduate:afewpublicationsmayconvincepotentialemployerofresearchpotentialSomethingisbetterthannothingYet,avoidpublishingcrapStrategicplanisuseful:publishwhat,where,atwhatpace,withwhom?PublishorperishWriting,science,andskepticismWritingdefineswhatweconsidertobeknowledge.

ScientificresultsareonlyacceptedascorrectoncetheyarerefereedandpublishedAunifyingprincipleforthescientificcultureisskepticismWithinscience,skepticismisanopen-mindedapproachtoknowledgeWriting,science,andskepticismScienceisasystemforaccumulatingreliableknowledge.Theprocessofscience:speculation,observation,andagrowingunderstandingofsomeideaorphenomenon.Writingunderpinstheresearchcycle.thedisciplineofstatingideasasorganizedtextforcesyoutoformulateandclarifyyourthoughtsKindsofPublicationScientificresultscanbepresentedinAbookAthesisAjournalarticleAcompletepaperorextendedabstractinaconferenceorworkshopproceedingsAtechnicalreportoramanuscriptAposterinaconferenceorworkshopBooksvsPapersBookstendnottocontainnewresultsorprovethecorrectnessoftheinformationtheypresentcanrepresentanauthor'sopinionsaswellasestablishedscientificknowledgePapersmustbedefendedandjustifiedJournalvsConferenceTheoreticalresearchalongtraditionofcompleting,revising,andextendingconferencepapersforsubmissionandpublicationinarchivaljournalsExperimentalresearchconferencepublicationispreferredtojournalpublicationthepremierconferencesaregenerallymoreselectivethanthepremierjournals/sites/ccf/paiming.jsp

中国人工智能学会推荐国际学术会议和

国际/国内期刊目录/index.php?s=/home/article/detail/id/3445.html智能科学与技术基础理论智能科学与技术交叉脑认知与类脑智能机器学习机器感知与模式识别自然语言处理知识工程与数据挖掘跨媒体智能与人机交互智能机器人与系统智能芯片与计算系统以及人工智能伦理安全与治理JournalAimforbalance:somequick“low”level:conferenceproceedings,web-basedjournals.Investtime&energyinatleastone/afew

prestigiouspublication/s“ifyoucandoone,youcandomore!”Getyourbestworkinthebestjournals(checkthemout:impactfactor?)Avoidnon-refereedjournals(unlessit’sreviewsoropinionpiecesforgeneralpublic)Avoideditorsthatworkslowly(youcan’twait3-4yrsforyourfirstpublicationtocomeout)ConferenceandWorkshopConferenceAlargeacademicmeetingWidescopeMoreattendanceLongerpaper(8-12pages)WorkshopAsmallermeetingNarrowscopeLessattendanceShorterpaper(6pages)CanbeheldtogetherwithaconferenceProceedingofConferenceorWorkshopPosterPostersessionseparateroomorareaofatradeshowfloorresearchersaccompanya

paperposterillustratingtheirresearchmethodsandoutcomesPosterSize:from2x3feetto4x8feetindimensionsDon’tchoosebogusconferencesEntomology-2013vsEntomology2013Don’tchoosebogusconferencesSCIgen:/scigen/WMSCI2005WorldMulticonferenceonSystemics,CyberneticsandInformaticsDon’tchoosebogusconferenceshttp://scigendetection.imag.fr/index.phpCyrilLabbéofJosephFourierUniversityinGrenoble,France,hascataloguedcomputer-generatedpapersthatmadeitintomorethan30publishedconferenceproceedingsbetween2008and2013.LabbédevelopedawaytoautomaticallydetectmanuscriptscomposedSCIgenLabbédoesnotknowwhythepapersweresubmitted—oreveniftheauthorswereawareofthem.MostoftheconferencestookplaceinChina,andmostofthefakepapershaveauthorswithChineseaffiliations.HowtogetpublishedIstheresearchtopichot?Doyoubelongtoanetworkofpeopleinterestedinthetopic?gotoconferencestalktomajorresearchersinthefield,contactauthorsifpaperisnoteasilyaccessible(alittleflatterycanhelp)KeepaneyeoncallforpapersofconferencesorspecialissuesoreditedbooksCyclesinwritingandpublicationDoingresearchShapingaresearchprojectsFindingandreadingliteratureResearchplanningHypothesesEvidenceExperimentWritingCyclesinwritingandpublicationDraftingRevisingProofreadingTypesettingSubmittingCyclesinwritingandpublicationPublicationNotificationRevisingagainbasedonthecommentsCopyrightformPrepareyourpresentationforaconferencepaperCosmeticworkforajournalpaperPaperStructure(1)TitleAuthor(s)Affiliation(s)andaddress(es)AbstractKeywordsNeedtobeaccurateandinformativeforeffectiveindexingandsearchingPaperStructure(2)IntroductionContentRelatedWorkConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesPaperStructure(3)

IntroductionProvidethenecessarybackgroundinformationtoputyourworkintocontextItshouldbeclearfromtheintroduction:Whythecurrentworkwasperformed–aims–significanceWhathasbeendonebeforeWhatwasdone(inbriefterms)Whatwasachieved(inbriefterms)PaperStructure(4)

AcknowledgementAcknowledgeanyonewhohashelpedyouwiththestudy,including:Researcherswhosuppliedmaterialsorsoftware,AnyonewhohelpedwiththewritingorEnglish,orofferedcriticalcommentsaboutthecontentAnyonewhoprovidedtechnicalhelpStatewhypeoplehavebeenacknowledgedandasktheirpermissionAcknowledgesourcesoffunding,includinganygrantorreferencenumbersPaperStructure(4)

Referencesthestyleandformatasrequired–itisnottheeditor’sjobtodosoforyouHarvardSystem(alphabeticalbyauthor/date)APA(AmericanPsychologicalAssociation)System(alphabetical)VancouverSystem(numberedinorderorcitation)Note:thereareanumberofothersystemsinuseandvariationsforallsystemsSupplementarymaterialInformationrelatedtoandsupportiveofthemaintext,butofsecondaryimportanceDataCodeVideodataWillbemadeavailableonlinewhenthemanuscriptispublishedEthicsScienceisbuiltontrustResearchersareexpectedtobehonest

ResearchisassumedtohavebeenundertakenethicallyNoPlagiarismFake-paperfactories–PaperMillIn2017,China’sMinistryofScienceandTechnology(MOST)saiditwouldcrackdownonmisconductafterascandalinwhich107paperswereretractedatthejournalTumorBiology<<科学技术活动违规行为处理暂行规定>>“从事学术论文买卖、代写代投以及伪造、虚构、篡改研究数据等”EthicsChecklist(1)--AuthorshipIsallthetextyours?Areyouthecopyrightholderforallfiguresandillustrations?Haveanyauthorsbeenlistedwithouttheirknowledge?Haveotherpotentialauthorsbeenomitted?Dotheyknowthatpublicationisproceedingwithoutthem?Journalpullstwo-studiesthatlistedanauthorwithouthispermissionSpringerNaturehasremovedtwostudiesthatwerepublishedinitsjournalClusterComputingAFCMcluster:cloudnetworkingmodelforintelligenttransportationinthecityofMacauMobilenetworkintrusiondetectionforIoTsystembasedontransferlearningalgorithmDavidCox,theIBMDirectoroftheMIT-IBMWatsonAILabEthicsChecklist(2)Isthescopeofcitationandattributionclear?Isthereacleardistinctionbetweennewworkandpreviousknowledge?Hasotherworkwithsimilarresultsbeenappropriatelycitedanddiscussed?Ifanymaterialissharedwithanotherpaper,hasthesharingbeenexplainedtothereader?Hasitbeenexplainedtotheeditor?Doesthepaperincludematerialrecycledfromyourearlierwork?Areotherpapersaccuratelydescribed?EthicsReproducibilityinScience“non-reproduciblesingleoccurrencesareofnosignificancetoscience”--KarlPopper<TheLogicofScientificDiscovery>Reproducibleresearch:researchpaperalongwiththelaboratorynotebooksandfullcomputationalenvironmentusedtoproducetheresultsinthepapersuchasthecode,data,etc.around$28billionworthofresearchperyearinmedicalfieldsisnon-reproducibleEthicsChecklist(3)Reproducibility:Couldyouruntheexperimentsagainandgetthesameoutcome?Doyouknowwhichversionofthecodewasusedtoruntheexperiments?Arethereanyweaknessesorlimitationsintheexperimentsthatneedtobedescribed?Wouldyoubepreparedtoshowotherresearcherstherawexperimentalmaterials?Areanyclaimsoverstated?EthicsTheSouthernUniversityofScienceandTechnologyseveredtieswiththescientistwhorattledresearcherslastyearafterheclaimedtohaveengineeredtheworld’sfirstgene-editedbabiesRegulationsintheU.S.,U.K.,China,andelsewhererequiregenetically-modifiedhumanembryostobedestroyedafterafewdays.EthicalIssuesforAIPrivacy&Security:AIsystemsshouldbesecureandrespectprivacyReliability&Safety:AIsystemsshouldperformreliablyandsafelyTransparency:AIsystemsshouldbeunderstandableAccountability:AIsystemsshouldhavealgorithmicaccountabilityFairness:AIsystemsshouldtreatallpeoplefairlyEthicalIssuesforAIPrivacyProtectionDatacollectedfor‘BigData’originatesfrommanyaspectsofhumanactivitiesandmayinvolvecollectionofpersonaldataAvoidBiasandDiscriminationDataBalanceFacialRecognitionExamplesTwoscientistsfromChina'sShanghaiJiaoTongUniversityproducedastudythatclaimstobeabletotellacriminalfromalaw-abidingcitizensolelybasedonafacialrecognitionalgorithm.IEEEfoundthatpolicesurveillancecamerasusingfacialrecognitiontoidentifysuspectedcriminalsarefiveto10percentlessaccuratewhenidentifyingAfricanAmericans.AI’sUnethicalRoleinScholarlyWritingAItools

forAcademicWritingEthicProblemsinWritingwithGPTControversyoveroriginalityReferencesgeneratedbytheAIarefictiousScienceannouncedAIcannotbeanauthor.AItools

forAcademicWritingTopAIconferencebansuseofChatGPTandAIlanguagetoolstowriteacademicpapersClarificationonLargeLanguageModelPolicy2023(icml.cc)AItools

forReviewingEthicProblemsReviewingwithAItoolsLackofTransparency:underminetrustinthereviewprocessConfidentiality:confidentialinformationcouldbeleakedAccountability:whoisresponsiblefordecisionsmade?EthicalUseofAI:AItoolsareusedtoautomatedecisionsInformedConsent:affectauthor’strustinthereviewprocessQualityControl:unreliableassessmentsandcompromisethereviewprocess.AItools

forReviewingReviewingwithAItools'papercontributions'sectionofthereviewsubmittedbythereviewer:getstraightoutofChatGPT:IDENTICAL/posts/david-churchill-41171730_chatgpt-activity-7079567258854785025-mlwJ?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktopIntroductiontoPeer-Review“Peerreviewistheassessmentbyanexpertofmaterialsubmittedforpublication.”PublicationprocessAwardingoffundingforresearchPatentsStandardsGalileo

PeerReview:Refereeing(1)Refereeingcanbeachore,butdeservesthesameeffort,care,andethicalstandardsasanyotherresearchactivityResonsibilitiesAuthorReferee:fair,objective,avoidconflictofinterestEditor:choosereferees,arbitratebasedonreferees’evaluationPeerReview:Refereeing(2)ContributionoriginalityandvalidityEvaluationofpapersIsthereacontribution?Isitsignificant?Isthecontributionofinterest?Isthecontributiontimelyoronlyofhistoricalinterest?Isthetopicrelevanttothelikelyreadership?Aretheresultscorrect?Aretheproposalsandresultscriticallyanalyzed?RefereeingChecklistAreappropriateconclusionsdrawnfromtheresults,orarethereotherpossibleinterpretations?Areallthetechnicaldetailscorrect?Aretheysensible?Couldtheresultsbeverified?Arethereanyseriousambiguitiesorinconsistencies?Whatismissing?Whatwouldcompletethepresentation?Isanyofthematerialunnecessary?Howbroadisthelikelyreadership?Canthepaperbeunderstood?Isitclearlywritten?Isthepresentationatanadequatestandard?Refereereport(1)10:Awardquality:TechnicallyflawlesspaperwithgroundbreakingimpactononeormoreareasofAI,withexceptionallystrongevaluation,reproducibility,andresources,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.9:VeryStrongAccept:TechnicallyflawlesspaperwithgroundbreakingimpactonatleastoneareaofAIandexcellentimpactonmultipleareasofAI,withflawlessevaluation,resources,andreproducibility,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.8:StrongAccept:Technicallystrongpaperwith,withnovelideas,excellentimpactonatleastoneareaofAIorhigh-to-excellentimpactonmultipleareasofAI,withexcellentevaluation,resources,andreproducibility,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.7:Accept:Technicallysolidpaper,withhighimpactonatleastonesub-areaofAIormoderate-to-highimpactonmorethanoneareaofAI,withgood-to-excellentevaluation,resources,reproducibility,andnounaddressedethicalconsiderations.6:WeakAccept:Technicallysolid,moderate-to-highimpactpaper,withnomajorconcernswithrespecttoevaluation,resources,reproducibility,ethicalconsiderations.Refereereport(1)5:Borderlineaccept:Technicallysolidpaperwherereasonstoacceptoutweighreasonstoreject,e.g.,limitedevaluation.Pleaseusesparingly.4:Borderlinereject:Technicallysolidpaperwherereasonstoreject,e.g.,limitedevaluation,outweighreasonstoaccept,e.g.,goodevaluation.Pleaseusesparingly.3:Reject:Forinstance,apaperwithtechnicalflaws,weakevaluation,inadequatereproducibilityandincompletelyaddressedethicalconsiderations.2:StrongReject:Forinstance,apaperwithmajortechnicalflaws,and/orpoorevaluation,limitedimpact,poorreproducibilityandmostlyunaddressedethicalconsiderations.1:VeryStrongReject:Forinstance,apaperwithtrivialresultsorunaddressedethicalconsiderations.Refereereport(1)SummaryofpaperGoodthingsaboutthepaper(oneparagraph)CommentsandRecommendationsRefereereport(2)StrongpointsThisisanexcellentanalysisoftheoryandpracticeinrelationto[...].Thismaterialshowshowpracticalexperiencecanprovidedirectionsfortranscendingsteriletheoreticaldebates.Thearticleisverywellwritten,logicallystructuredandapleasuretoread.Useofsourcesisappropriate.Refereereport(3)WeakpointsInsteadofthelasttwoparagraphsofthearticle,itwouldbemorehelpfultohaveaseparateconclusionsectionwithasummaryofthekeypointsmadeinthearticle,anassessmentof[...],andpossiblysomecommentsonhowinsightsfromthisassessmentmightbeusedinotherpartsoftheworld.ArefereeingchecklistConvinceyourselfthatithasnoseriousdefectsConvincetheeditorthatitisofanacceptablestandard,byexplainingwhyitisoriginal,valid,andclear.Listthechanges,majorandminor,thatshouldbemadebeforeitappears

inprint,andwherepossiblehelptheauthorbyindicatingnotjustwha