![5-定量火灾评估_第1页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a0/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a01.gif)
![5-定量火灾评估_第2页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a0/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a02.gif)
![5-定量火灾评估_第3页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a0/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a03.gif)
![5-定量火灾评估_第4页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a0/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a04.gif)
![5-定量火灾评估_第5页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a0/2abbeca8e6d86409023bc0232fb197a05.gif)
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
Chapter5
QuantitativeFireRiskAssessment5.1OverviewInthischapter,quantitativefireriskassessmentisintroduced.Thetermquantitativefireriskassessmentreferstoanassessmentinvolvingnumericalquantificationsnotonlyoftheprobabilityafirehazard,orfirescenariooccurring,butalsotheconsequencesofthatfirehazardorfirescenario.Bymultiplyingthenumericalvaluesofprobabilityandconsequenceeachfirescenarioisgivenanumericalfireriskvalue.Byaccumulatingthesumoftheriskvaluesfromallprobablefirescenarioswecanobtainanoverallfireriskvalue.Theoverallfireriskvaluecanbeusedforcomparisonswiththoseofalternativeorcode-compliantfiresafetydesigns.Ingeneraltherearetwowaystoperformsystematicquantitativefire
riskassessmentsasfollows:1.byusingachecklisttogothroughalistofpotentialfirehazardsandthequantitativeassessmentoftheirfirerisks;2.byusinganeventtreetogothroughasetofpotentialfirescenariosandthequantitativeassessmentoftheirfirerisks.Inboththesemethods,thevaluesfortheprobabilityandconsequenceparametersareobtainedfromstatisticaldata,iftheyareavailable,orfromsubjectivejudgment,ifsuchdataarenotavailable.(仅在我们本课程的讲解中,采用了统计或主观估计的方式,火灾的结果还可以通过确定性的分析计算获得)5.2ChecklistMethodAswasdiscussedinChapter4,thechecklistmethodemploysthecreationofachecklistofpotentialfirehazardsandtheconsiderationoffireprotectionmeasures,eitherinplaceortobeadded,toarriveatanassessmentofthefirerisks.Thecreationofachecklistofpotential
firehazardsallowsasystematiccheckofpotentialfirehazardsthatareinplace.Thelistingoffireprotectionmeasuresalongsidewiththepotentialfirehazardsallowsaquickcheckofanysafetydeficienciesandanyneedtoprovideadditionalfireprotectionmeasurestominimizetherisk.Thechecklistmethod,therefore,isanenumerationofpotentialfirehazards,fireprotectionmeasures,eitherinplaceortobeadded,andtheassessmentoftheresidualfirerisks.Itisusedtoidentifyanydeficienciesandanycorrectivemeasuresneededtominimizethefirerisks.Itdoesnotinclude,however,theconsiderationofthelogicaldevelopmentoffireevents,whichwillbediscussedinSection5.3usinganeventtree.AnexampleofachecklistmethodemployingquantitativefireriskassessmentisshowninTable5.2.ThisisthesameexamplethatwasusedinChapter4,exceptthatquantitativeassessmentisemployedhereratherthanqualitativeassessment.Thisexamplelooksatapotentialfirehazardinthelivingroomofahouseandtheconsiderationofanumberofadditionalfireprotectionmeasurestominimizetherisk.Obviously,therecouldbemanypotentialfirehazardsinahouse.Acompletefireriskassessmentwouldinvolvetheidentificationofallpotentialfirehazardsandtheconsiderationofvariousfireprotectionmeasurestominimizetherisk.Atypicalhouseusuallyhassomefireprotectionmeasures,suchassmokealarms.Additionalfireprotectionmeasureswouldlowertheriskfurther.SimilartotheexampleinChapter4,thisexampleconsiderssixdifferentcombinationsofthreeadditionalfireprotectionmeasures.Thethreeadditionalfireprotectionmeasuresare:(1)nosmokingmaterial(suchascigarettes)inthelivingroom,(2)sprinklers(3)regularevacuationdrills.Eachofthethreefireprotectionmeasureshasanimpactoneithertheprobabilityoffireoccurrenceortheconsequenceofafireoccurrence.Forexample,themeasureof‘nosmokingmaterialinthelivingroom’wouldhaveanimpactonloweringtheprobabilityoffireoccurrence;whereasthemeasuresof‘sprinklers’and‘regularevacuationdrills’wouldhaveanimpactonloweringtheconsequenceofafireoccurrencebysuppressingorcontrollingthefireorbyallowingtheoccupantstoevacuatemorequickly.Itshouldbeemphasizedthatthisisjustanexampletoshowhowquantitativefireriskassessmentcanbecarriedoutusingachecklistmethod.Therearenostandardchecklistmethodsinfireriskassessment.InTable5.2,theinherentfireriskvalues(withoutthehelpofanyfireprotectionmeasures)wereobtainedpreviouslyinChapter3.Table3.2inChapter3showsthattheprobabilityoffireoccurrenceinCanadianhouseswas1.75×10−3fires/house/yearin1996andthepercentageofthesehousefiresthatoccurredinthemainlivingareawas8.5%.Usingthesefigures,theprobabilityoffireoccurrenceinthemainlivingareainCanadianhousesin1996was,therefore,1.75×10−3×8.5%or1.49×10−4fires/house/year.Table3.2inChapter3alsoshowsthattheconsequenceoffiresoriginatinginthemainlivingareain1996was43.2×10−3deaths/fire,andtheresultantrisktolifefromthesefireswas6.43×10−6deaths/house/year.ThesepreviouslyobtainedinherentriskvaluesareusedinthepresentexampleandareshowninTable5.2.TheinherentriskvaluesinTable5.2werebasedonfirestatisticswhichincludedsomefireprotectionmeasures,suchassmokealarms,thatwererequiredbyregulations.Ifadditionalfireprotectionmeasuresareputinplace,theinherentfireriskswouldbefurtherreduced.InTable5.2,theimpactofeachofthesixfireprotectioncombinationsisassessedusingaresidualmultiplicationfactoroftheinherentvaluesoftheprobabilityortheconsequence.Thisallowsthefireprotectionengineersandtheregulatorstoassesstheimpactofthesefireprotectionmeasuresbasedontheirassessmentsofthereductionoftheinherentvalues.Onewaytoassesstheimpactoffireprotectionmeasuresisthroughtheuseofstatisticalinformation,iftheyareavailable.Unfortunately,suchinformationisnotalwaysavailable.Theinformationmaybeinthedatabasesofcollectionagencies,butnotnecessarilyintheirpublishedreportswhichusuallyshowgeneralinformationandnotthespecificinformationthatisrequiredforfireriskassessment.Ifnosuchinformationisavailable,subjectivejudgmentmayberequired.Otherwise,theuseoffundamentalandrationalapproachtoquantificationisrequired,includingtheuseofmathematicalmodelingoffiredevelopmentandoccupantevacuation,whichwillbediscussedinlaterchapters.Forexample,thereissomestatisticalinformationonthebenefitsofrestrictingsmokingmaterialandofinstallingsprinklers,butnotmuchinformationonthebenefitsofimplementingregularevacuationdrills.NFPAstatisticsshowthatapproximately7%offiresinhomesarecausedbysmokingmaterials(NFPAFireStatistics,2006)andapproximately14%ofthesefiresoccurinthemainlivingarea(Hall,2006).Therefore,7×14%orapproximately1.0%offiresinhomesarefiresthatbothoriginateinthemainlivingareaandarecausedbysmokingmaterial.IfthesefirestatisticscanalsoapplytoCanadianhomes,thenrestrictingsmokingmaterialinthemainlivingareawouldreducethenumberoffireoccurrenceinthemainlivingareafrom8.5%(seeTable3.2inChapter3)to7.5%ofhousefires.Thereductionoffireoccurrencefrom8.5to7.5%is12%.Thecorrespondingresidualmultiplicationfactoroftheinherentprobabilityvaluebyrestrictingsmokingmaterialistherefore0.88,whichisshowninTable5.2.NFPAstatisticsalsoshowthat,basedon1989–1998data,thereductionindeathsinoneandtwofamilydwellingswithsprinklersis51%whencomparedwithsimilardwellingswithoutsprinklers(KimberlyandHall,2005).Thecorrespondingresidualmultiplicationfactoroftheinherentconsequencevaluebyinstallingsprinklersistherefore0.49,whichisshowninTable5.2.Withregardtothebenefitsofimplementingregularevacuationdrills,thereisnoinformationonthereductionofdeathratesthatiseasilyavailable.Forthisexample,wehavetomakeanassumption.Weknowthatifregularevacuationdrillsarecarriedout,therewillbefasterevacuationsandthereforelowerdeathrates.Forthisexample,letusassumeareductionofthedeathrateby60%.Theresidualmultiplicationfactoroftheinherentconsequencevaluebyimplementingregularevacuationdrillsistherefore0.40,whichisshowninTable5.2.Inactualfireriskassessments,thisvalueneedstobejudgedandagreeduponbetweenthefireprotectionengineersandregulators.Table5.2alsoshowsthattheimpactsontheconsequenceofinstallingsprinklersandofimplementingregularevacuationdrillsaremultipliedtogether.Thatis,thebenefitsofsprinklersandofregularevacuationdrillshaveacombinedresidualconsequencefactorof0.49×0.40or0.20.Themultiplicationoftheresidualfactorsisbasedontheargumentthateachfireprotectionmeasurereducestheresidualdeathratebyacertainpercentageinsuccession.Thedeathrateisfirstreducedbythesprinklerssuppressingtheseverityofthefires,andthenfurtherreducedbyfasterevacuationoftheoccupants.ThereductionoftheriskvaluesofthesixcombinationsofadditionalfireprotectionmeasuresisshowninTable5.2.Theresidualriskmultiplicationfactorsrangefrom0.88to0.20.Thequantificationoftheriskvaluesallowsnumericalcomparisonsofthevariousfireprotectionoptions.Thisisnotthecaseinqualitativefireriskassessment(Table4.4inChapter4).ItshouldbeemphasizedagainthatthevaluesinTable5.2areselectedasanexampletoshowhowsuchachecklistmethodcanbecarriedout.Thesevalueswereselectedfromavailablestatisticalinformationwithoutmuchin-depthsearch.Asmorestatisticalinformationbecomesavailable,moreextensivesearchanddetailedanalysisareneededtofindthecorrectvalues.Inactualfireriskassessments,thesevaluesneedtobecarefullyselectedandagreeduponbystakeholders.Inactualfireriskassessments,thesevaluesneedtobecarefullyselectedandagreeduponbystakeholders.Subjectivejudgmentoftheprobabilitiesandconsequencesprovidesaquickassessmentofthepotentialfirerisks.Morefundamentalandrationalapproachestoquantification,includingtheuseofmathematicalmodelingoffiredevelopmentandoccupantevacuation,willbediscussedinlaterchapters.5.4Event-TreeMethodAneventtreeisanotherwaytoidentifypotentialfirehazards,assesstheirprobabilitiesandconsequences,andarriveatriskvalues.Differentfromthechecklistmethod,aneventtreeshowsmorethanalistofpotentialfirehazardsandfireprotectionmeasuresfortheassessmentoftheprobabilities,consequencesandeventuallytheriskvalues.Theevent-treemethodinvolvestheconstructionofaneventtreeofvariousfirescenariossubsequenttotheinitiationofafirehazard,asdescribedinChapter2.Thefirescenariosprovidemorelogicalinformationforthejudgmentofprobability,consequenceandriskvalues.Anexampleofanevent-treemethodemployingquantitativefireriskassessmentisshowninFigure5.1.ThisisthesameexamplethatwasusedinChapter4,exceptthatquantitativeassessmentisemployedratherthanqualitativeassessment.InFigure5.1,thebranchingtodifferenteventsdependsonthesuccessorfailureofthefireprotectionmeasuresinplace.Thisexamplelooksatonefirehazardinanassumedapartmentbuildingandtheconsiderationofanumberofadditionalfireprotectionmeasurestominimizetherisk.Thesameeventtreecanbeconstructedformorehazardsandmorefireprotectionmeasures.Acompletefireriskassessmentwouldinvolvetheidentificationofallpotentialfirehazardsandtheconsiderationofvariousfireprotectionmeasurestominimizetherisk.Atypicalapartmentbuildingusuallyhassomefireprotectionmeasures,suchasfireresistantconstructionandfirealarms.Additionalfireprotectionmeasureswouldlowertheriskfurther.ThisexampleconsidersthesamesixdifferentcombinationsofthreeadditionalfireprotectionmeasureswhichwereconsideredinthechecklistmethodinSection5.3.Thethreeadditionalfireprotectionmeasuresare:(1)nosmokingmaterial(suchascigarettes)intheapartments,(2)sprinklersand(3)regularevacuationdrills.Eachofthethreefireprotectionmeasureshasanimpactoneithertheprobabilityoffireoccurrenceortheconsequenceofafireoccurrence.Forexample,themeasureof‘nosmokingmaterialintheapartment’wouldhaveanimpactonloweringtheprobabilityoffireoccurrence;whereasthemeasuresof‘sprinklersand‘regularevacuationdrills’wouldhaveanimpactonloweringtheconsequenceofafireoccurrencebysuppressingorcontrollingthefireorbyallowingtheoccupantstoevacuatemorequickly.Aswasinthediscussionofthechecklistmethod,theeventtreeinFigure5.1isonlyanexampletoshowhowaneventtreecanbeusedforquantitativefireriskassessment.Thedescriptionofeacheventisthejudgmentforthisexampleonly.Otherapplicationsmayhavedifferentdescriptions.Thedescriptionsallowmoretransparentdiscussionsandagreementsamongstakeholders.Inanevent-treemethod,theprobabilityofeachfirescenarioiscalculatedusingtheprobabilityvaluesofsuccessorfailureofimplementingthefireprotectionmeasuresthatareassociatedwiththescenario.Someoftheseprobabilityvaluescanbeobtainedfromstatistics,iftheyareavailable.Forexample,NFPAstatisticsshowthat,basedonthe1999–2002data,sprinklersinapartmentbuildingshaveareliabilityof96%ofactivatingandcontrollinglargefiresthatshouldactivatesprinklers(KimberlyandHall,2005).Notethatsmoulderingfiresandsmallfiresmaynotactivatesprinklers.Ifnosuchinformationisavailable,thensubjectivejudgmentmayberequired.Forexample,thereisnostatisticalinformationthatcanbeeasilyfoundontheprobabilityofsuccessorfailureofimplementinga‘nosmokingmaterial’plansothattherewillbealowerrateoffireoccurrence.Withoutsuchstatisticalinformation,wehavetomakeanassumption.Letusassumeforthisexamplethattheprobabilityofsuccessofimplementinga‘nosmokingmaterial’planis70%.Similarly,thereisnostatisticalinformationthatcanbeeasilyfoundontheprobabilityofsuccessorfailureofimplementinga‘regularevacuationdrills’planinapartmentbuildingssothattheoccupantswouldknowwhattodoincaseofafirealarmandwouldthereforeevacuatemorequicklythanwithoutsuchdrills.Letusassumeforthisexamplethattheprobabilityofsuccessofimplementinga‘regularevacuationdrills’planis80%.Inrealriskassessments,thesevaluesneedtobecarefullyanalysedandagreeduponbyfiresafetyengineersandregulators.Successisdefinedasthatthefireprotectionplanactuallyworks.ThescenarioprobabilitiesareshowninFigure5.1.Forexample,ScenarioAhasaprobabilityof2.40×10−03,whichistheproductof0.30(failureprobabilityofimplementinga‘nosmokingmaterial'plan)×0.04(failureprobabilityof‘sprinklersystem’)×0.20(failureprobabilityofimplementinga‘regularevacuationdrills’plan).Intheevent-treemethod,theprobabilityoffireoccurrenceforeachfirescenarioisassessedbasedontheinherentrateoffireoccurrenceandtheimpactofvariousfirepreventionmeasurestominimizethisinherentrateoffireoccurrence.InFigure5.1,theimpactofeachofthefireprotectionmeasuresontheinherentrateoffireoccurrenceisassessedusingaresidualprobabilitymultiplier.在事件树方法中,每一个火灾场景出现的可能性基于火灾发生的固有频率和各种火灾安全措施对降低火灾发生固有频率的影响来确定。如图5.1,每一种火灾保护措施对火灾发生固有频率的影响通过一个残余可能性因子来体现(residualprobabilitymultiplier)。Thisallowsthefireprotectionengineersandregulatorstoassesstheimpactofthesefireprotectionmeasuresbasedontheirassessmentsofthereductionoftheprobabilityoffireoccurrence.Someoftheseresidualprobabilitymultiplierscanbeobtainedfromstatistics,iftheyareavailable.Ifnosuchinformationisavailable,thensubjectivejudgmentmayberequired.火灾安全工程师基于火灾安全措施对火灾发生可能性的减缩情况来确定火灾安全措施的影响。某些残余可能性因子可由统计数据获得,如果没有可用的统计数据,则需要进行主观判断。比如没有“在公寓中使用阻燃材料”对减少火灾发生影响的统计数据。
我们只能对此进行假设,在本例中假设“在公寓中使用阻燃材料”与“在建筑中禁烟”对火灾发生可能性的影响相同,其残余可能性因子为0.88(见Table5.2)。即在“在公寓中使用阻燃材料”成功,其结果是将火灾发生的频率下降到其固有频率的0.88。Forexample,thereisnostatisticalinformationthatcanbeeasilyfoundonthereductionoffireoccurrenceofimplementinga‘nosmokingmaterial’planforapartmentbuildings.Withoutsuchstatisticalinformation,wehavetomakeanassumption.Letusassumeforthisexamplethattheresidualprobabilitymultiplierofa‘nosmokingmaterial’planinapartmentbuildingis0.88,thesameasthatforhousefires(seeTable5.2).Thatis,theconsequenceofasuccessful‘nosmokingmaterial’planisthereductionoftherateoffireoccurrenceto0.88ofitsinherentvalue.ThisresidualprobabilitymultiplierforeachfirescenarioisshowninFigure5.1.Forexample,ScenariosA,B,C,D,allwithafailureofimplementingthe‘nosmokingmaterial’plan,havearesidualprobabilitymultiplierof1(noreduction);whereasScenarioE,F,G,H,allwithasuccessofimplementingthe‘nosmokingmaterial’plan,havearesidualprobabilitymultiplierof0.88.每一个火灾场景的这个残余可能性因子在图5.1中显示出来。比如ScenariosA,B,C,D,“在公寓中使用阻燃材料”全部失败,残余可能性因子为1,意味着没有减少火灾的发生;而ScenarioE,F,G,H,“在公寓中使用阻燃材料”成功,具有的残余可能性因子为0.88,即火灾发生的可能性,降低到固有值的0.88。Thatis,theconsequenceofa‘nosmokingmaterial’planisthereductionoftherateoffireoccurrenceto0.88ofitsinherentvalue.Alsoinanevent-treemethod,theconsequenceofeachfirescenarioisassessedbasedontheinherentconsequenceofthefireandtheimpactofthevariousfireprotectionmeasurestominimizetheconsequence.InFigure5.1,theimpactofeachofthefireprotectionmeasuresontheconsequenceisassessedusingaresidualconsequencemultiplier.Thisallowsthefireprotectionengineersandregulatorstoassesstheimpactofthesefireprotectionmeasuresbasedontheirassessmentsofthereductionoftheconsequence.Someoftheseresidualconsequencemultiplierscanbeobtainedfromstatistics,iftheyareavailable.Forexample,NFPAstatisticsshowthat,basedonthe1989–1998data,thereductionindeathsinapartmentbuildingswithsprinklersis81%whencomparedwithsimilarbuildingswithoutsprinklers(KimberlyandHall,2005).Theresidualconsequencemultiplierofasprinklersystemthereforeis0.19.Thatis,theconsequenceofinstallingasprinklersystemisthereductionofthedeathrateperfireto0.19ofitsinherentvalue.Ifnosuchinformationisavailable,thensubjectivejudgmentmayberequired.Forexample,thereisnostatisticalinformationthatcanbeeasilyfoundonthedeathreductionbenefitofimplementinga‘regularevacuationdrills’plan.Withoutsuchstatisticalinformation,wehavetomakeanassumptionagain.Letusassumeforthisexamplethattheresidualconsequencemultiplierofa‘regularevacuationdrills’planis0.40.Thatis,theconsequenceofa‘regularevacuationdrills’planisthereductionofthedeathrateperfireto0.40ofitsinherentvalue.ThisresidualconsequencemultiplierforeachscenarioisshowninFigure5.1.Forexample,ScenarioBhasaresidualconsequencemultiplierof0.40,whichistheproductof1.00(residualconsequencemultiplierofafailedsprinklersystem)×0.40(residualconsequencemultiplierofasuccessful‘regularevacuationdrills’plan).Figure5.1showstheresidualriskvaluesofallthefirescenarioswhicharebasedonthesuccessorfailureofthreefireprotectionmeasures.Theprobabilityvalueofeachfirescenarioistheproductoftheindividualprobabilityvaluesofallthebranchesthatareassociatedwiththatscenario.Theresidualprobabilitymultiplierofeachscenarioistheproductoftheindividualprobabilitymultipliersofallthefireprotectionmeasuresthatareassociatedwiththatscenario.Theresidualconsequencemultiplierofeachscenarioistheproductoftheindividualconsequencemultipliersofallthefireprotectionmeasuresthatareassociatedwiththatscenario.
Finally,theresidualriskmultiplierforeachscenarioistheproductof(scenarioprobability)×(residualprobabilitymultiplier)×(residualconsequencemultiplier).Forexample,ScenarioEhasascenarioresidualriskmultiplierof4.93×10−03,whichistheproductof5.60×10−03(scenarioprobability)×0.88(residualprobabilitymultiplier)×1.00(residualconsequencemultiplier).InFigure5.1,themultiplicationoftheresidualmultipliersisbasedontheargument,asdiscussedinSection5.3,thateachfireprotectionmeasurereducestherateoffireoccurrence,ortheseverityofthefire,orthedeathrateperfire,insuccessionbyacertainpercentage.Itshouldbeemphasizedagainthatthevaluesintheexampleareselectedbytheauthorasanexampletoshowhowsuchevent-treemethodcanbecarriedout.Inrealriskassessments,thesevaluesneedtobecarefullyanalyzedandagreeduponbyfiresafetyengineersandregulators.Subjectivejudgmentoftheprobabilitiesandconsequencesprovidesaquickassessmentofthepotentialfirerisks.Morefundamentalandrationalapproachestoquantification,includingtheuseofmathematicalmodelingoffiredevelopmentandoccupantevacuation,willbediscussedinlaterchapters.Differentfromthechecklistmethod,theevent-treemethodallowsthesummationoftheriskvaluesofallthefirescenariosintoonesingleriskvalueforthewholesystem.Thisallowsdirectcomparisonsoftheriskvaluesofvariousfiresafetydesignoptions,includingcode-compliantdesigns.Figure5.1showsthecombinedresidualriskmultiplierofimplementingthesethreefireprotectionmeasuresis1.06×10−1.Thatis,theresidualriskisreducedto10.6%ofitsinherentvalueTheinherentfireriskvaluesofapartmentbuildingscanbeobtainedfromstatistics.Forexample,inCanada,the1996Canadianfirestatistics(CouncilofCanadianFireMarshalsandFireCommissioners,1996)showthatthetotalnumberoffiredeathsinapartmentbuildingsinthatyearwas88.Also,the1996Canadiancensusdata(StatisticsCanada,1996)showthatthetotalnumberofapartmentunitsunderthecategoryof‘apartment5ormorestoreys’was979470.Theriskofdyinginanapartmentunit,therefore,was88deathsdividedby979470apartmentsor8.98×10−5deaths/apartment/year.Comparethisriskvaluewiththatofhousefiresof1.94×10−5deaths/house/year(seeChapter3,Section3.3.3),theriskofapartmentfiresismuchhigher.Partoftheexplanationscouldbethatthefirerisksinahousearecausedbyfiresoriginatinginthesamehouse,whereasthefirerisksinanapartmentunitarecausedbyfiresoriginatingfromallapartmentunitsinabuilding.5.5SummaryQuantitativefireriskassessmentisanassessmentinvolvingnumericalquantificationsofboththeprobabilityofoccurrenceofafirehazard,orfirescenario,andtheconsequenceofthatfirehazardorfirescenario.Themultiplicationofthenumericalvaluesofprobabilityandconsequencegiveseachfirescenarioanumericalfireriskvalue.Thecumulativesumoftheriskvaluesfromallprobablefirescenariosgivesanoverallfireriskvalue.Theassessedriskcanberisktolife,lossofpropertyandsoon.Quantitativefireriskassessmentallowsanumericalcomparisonoftheoverallfireriskvaluesofdifferentfiresafetydesignsinabuilding.Italsoallowstheassessmentofequivalencybycomparingthefireriskofanalternativefiresafetydesignwiththatofacode-compliantdesign.Thereareingeneraltwowaysofconductingsystematicquantitativefireriskassessments:(1)usingachecklisttogothroughalistofpotentialfirehazardsandthequantitativeassessmentoftheirfirerisks;(2)usinganeventtreetogothroughasetofthepotentialfirescenariosandthequantitativeassessmentoftheirfirerisks.Withinthechecklistmethod,therearespecificmethodsthathavebeendevelopedbyvariousorganizationsfortheirownuse.Oneparticularoneiscalledtheriskindexingmethodwhichuseswell-definedschedules,ortables,toratetherisks.Inboththechecklistandevent-treemethods,theoutcomeisalistofpotentialfirehazards,orfirescenarios,andtheirassessedfireriskvalues.Summationofalltheseindividualriskvaluesgivesanoverallfireriskvalueinabuildingthatcanbeusedforcomparisonswiththoseofalternativefiresafetydesigns.Itshouldbenotedthattherearesemi-quantitativeassessments,whereonlyoneofthetwoparameters(probabilityorconsequence)isassessedquantitatively.Theotherparameterthatisnotassessedquantitativelyisassessedqualitatively(seeChapter4).Thistypeofassessmentisneitherqualitativenorquantitative.Inthischapter,wediscussedonlyquantification
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 测试普通文档,上传后进入审核列表
- 公司食堂管理改善方案范文
- 执业药师2017药学综合重点识记:药学服务
- 第九章-评价中心
- 健康体检流程
- 高中二年级上学期英语《必修二 Unit 2 Bridging Cultures Build up your vocabulary》教学设计
- 新人教版四年级下册数学全册教案
- 新人教版二年级下册数学全册教案(教学设计)
- 桂林市资源县2024年四年级数学第二学期期末质量检测试题含解析
- 贵州省遵义市遵义县2024届六年级下学期小升初数学考前押题卷含解析
- 国家中长期科技发展规划纲要2021-2035
- 知校、爱校、荣校课件
- 光伏水上桩基施工方案
- 数字化矿山建设项目技术方案
- 银行柜面业务操作风险讲义
- 凉菜工艺流程图
- 碳排放简介及核算方法
- 2000字小论文标准格式模板
- 等比数列的前n项和公式课件
- 资产评估工作方案范本(三篇)
- HCIP-Datacom(H12-821)考试题库汇总(新导出版)
评论
0/150
提交评论