GRE写作：正确对待的模板

千里之行，始于第2页/共2页精品文档推荐GRE写作：正确对待的模板如何正确对待GRE写作模板?今日我给大家带来GRE写作之正确对待的模板，盼望能够关心到大家，下面我就和大家共享，来观赏一下吧。

GRE写作：正确对待的模板

(1)早点整理出自己的模板，什么是模板，应当怎么预备，会在下面的部分为G亲们说明，所以不用焦急。

(2)考试的时候挨次把握好，先读题，形成思路和粗略提纲敲首段，中间每段的主旨句和过渡段，最终敲尾段，依据时间，有层次地补充丰满每段的内容检查拼写语法错误，平常练习的时候就是不断地重复这样的挨次，做到特别熟识。

(3)狂写，练打字速度，尤其是练自己的模板、固定段落、常用事例的打字速度。当时用Issue部分的时间就可以把Issue和Argu全部写完，Issue上600，Argu上550;平常正常写的话，Issue可以上700，Argu上600，靠的就是固定段落、事例还有模板的打字特殊快，基本上Issue模板250字在几分钟之内就搞定了，Argu的模板就更夸张了，总共才500多字，模板就有一大半，而且基本上几分钟之内就可以完全打完。

在备考新GRE作文的过程中，其实是否预备网络流传的“高频”题目并不重要，而重要的是，无论预备什么题目，都能有正确的思索路径和分析方法，并且能够用正确的语言来表达自己的想法。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

Thefollowingappearedasalettertotheeditorofalocalnewspaper.

Fiveyearsago,weresidentsofMorgantonvotedtokeepthepubliclyownedpieceoflandknownasScottWoodsinanatural,undevelopedstate.Ourthinkingwasthat,ifnoshoppingcentersorhouseswerebuiltthere,ScottWoodswouldcontinuetobenefitourcommunityasanaturalparkland.Butnowthatourtownplanningcommitteewantstopurchasethelandandbuildaschoolthere,weshouldreconsiderthisissue.Ifthelandbecomesaschoolsite,noshoppingcentersorhousescanbebuiltthere,andsubstantialacreagewouldprobablybedevotedtoathleticfields.Therewouldbenobetteruseoflandinourcommunitythanthis,sincealargemajorityofourchildrenparticipateinsports,andScottWoodswouldcontinuetobenefitourcommunityasnaturalparkland.

TheargumentaboutScottWoodsbeingundevelopedlandseemtobeawellthoughtout.Thecommunityhasthoughtlongandhardaboutwhattheywantedtodowiththeland.Theydonotwantanyhomesorshoppingmallsonthelandbecauseitwouldnotbenefitthecommunityasanaturalparkland.Bybuildingtheschoolonthevacantlandisnotbenfitingthecommunityasnaturalparklandeither.Therewouldbethesametypeofconstructionandtraffic.Thatisverycontradictoryinitself.Ithinkthatthecommunitywouldhavetomeetagainanddecideexactlywasisbestforthisparticularcommunityandthechildreninthecommunity.Thepresentationsoundedsocloseandshutaboutwhatwasgoingtobedoneaboutthelandthatitseemeduslessforanybodytotrytopurchaseitanddoanythingwiththeland.SoiftheMorgantoncommunitywantsomethingsuchasaschoolbeingbuiltonthelandthatshouldhavebeenwhattheyvotedoninthefirstplace.Theylookveryindecisiveandevencontrolling.Thesearenotverygoodwaystoaccomplishordobusiness.

Comments:

Theopeningsentencesofthislimitedresponseseemtoagreewiththeargument,describingitaswellthoughtout.However,thewriterbeginstoconstructacritiqueinthefourthsentence,identifyingandbrieflydescribingoneflawedassumption:ifthecommunitymemberswanttoretainnaturalparkland,theywillnotbeabletodosobybuildingaschoolonthatland.

Thisistheonlyanalysisintheresponse,markingitasplainlyflawed.Theremainingfivesentencesfailtodeveloporaddtothiscritique.Somearetangential(Ithinkthatthecommunitywouldhavetomeetagain???)andothersareirrelevant(Theylookveryindecisiveandevencontrolling).

Thewritingdemonstrateslimitedlanguagecontrol.Therearemissingwords,syntaxerrors,andseveralgrammaticalerrors.Forthesereasons,theessayearnsthescoreof3.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

Thefollowingappearedasalettertotheeditorofalocalnewspaper.

Fiveyearsago,weresidentsofMorgantonvotedtokeepthepubliclyownedpieceoflandknownasScottWoodsinanatural,undevelopedstate.Ourthinkingwasthat,ifnoshoppingcentersorhouseswerebuiltthere,ScottWoodswouldcontinuetobenefitourcommunityasanaturalparkland.Butnowthatourtownplanningcommitteewantstopurchasethelandandbuildaschoolthere,weshouldreconsiderthisissue.Ifthelandbecomesaschoolsite,noshoppingcentersorhousescanbebuiltthere,andsubstantialacreagewouldprobablybedevotedtoathleticfields.Therewouldbenobetteruseoflandinourcommunitythanthis,sincealargemajorityofourchildrenparticipateinsports,andScottWoodswouldcontinuetobenefitourcommunityasnaturalparkland.

Theargumentthatthewriteristryingtomakecontainsseveralflaws.Firstofall,thewriterneedstobeclearonwhetherornotheorshewishestokeepScottWoodsinanatural,undevelopedstate.TobenaturalandundevelopedsuggestthatScottWoodsisfreefromanythingman-made.Ithasnotbeeninfectedwithman-madebuildingsofanykind.TheauthorsuggeststhatthebuildingofaschoolinScootWoodswouldpreserveMorgantonsnaturalparklandbypreventingtheconstructionofshoppingcentersandhouses.Yet,thebuildingofaschoolwouldpreventMorgantonfrompreservingthisnaturalparklandjustasshoppingcentersandhouses.Whiletheschoolmayprovidesubstantialacreageforathleticfields,itwouldbestillcontributingtopollution,thelossofvegetationandoveralldisruptiontothenaturalecosystemofScottWoods.Consequently,theareawouldnotbeanaturalparklandastheauthorsuggests.

Furthermore,theauthorappealstothesensitivityofthereadersthroughhisdiscussiononthechildrensparticipationinsports.Hefalselystatesthatthethechildrensuseoftheathleticfieldsthattheschoolwouldprovideisthebestwaytoutilizethisnaturalparkland.Again,theauthormistakinglyfeelsthatathleticfieldsconstituteanaturalparkland.Sincetheauthorcontinuouslymisusesthewordnaturalparkland,thevalidityoftheletterisweakened.

Comments:

Afteracknowledgingthattheargumentcontainsseveralflaws,thisadequateresponseidentifiesabasicprobleminthereasoning--theletterwritersambivalenceaboutthedesirabilityofmaintainingScottWoodsasnaturalandundevelopedparkland.Thewriterrecognizesthattheargumentsconfusedintentionsareindirectlyrelatedtoarootflawintheargument:theassumptionthatconstructionofnewbuildings--evenschoolbuildings--wouldnotimpactthepreservationoftheparkland.Further,thewriterdoesacompetentjobofexplaininghowbothoftheseproblemsaretheresultofalackofclarityaboutwhatconstitutesanaturalparkland.

Paragraph2identifiesanadditionalweaknessintheargument;thewriterrefusestobet