考研《英语一》名师预测卷1_第1页
考研《英语一》名师预测卷1_第2页
考研《英语一》名师预测卷1_第3页
考研《英语一》名师预测卷1_第4页
考研《英语一》名师预测卷1_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩4页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

精品文档-下载后可编辑考研《英语一》名师预测卷1

48.YouhadaveryunpleasantexperienceduringyourstayinWandaHotelforyourholiday.Writealettertothestoremanagertoexplaintheproblem,expressyourcomplaintsandsuggestasolutionYoushouldincludethedetailsyouthinknecessaryYoushouldwriteneatlyontheANSWERSHEET.Donotsignyourownnameattheendoftheletter.Use"LiMinginsteadDonotwritetheaddress.(10points)

49.Let’sstartbyrevisitingBorisJohnsonsinterviewwithDeutscheWellelastmonth,onwhetherthepoisonusedintheSalisburyattackcamefromRussia:BorisJohnson:Letmebeclearwithyou.WhenIlookattheevidence,ImeanthepeoplefromPortonDown.thelaboratoryDeutscheWelle:SotheyhavethesamplesBorisJohnson:Theydo.AndtheywereabsolutelycategoricalandIaskedtheguymyself,Isaid“Areyousure?”Andhesaidthere'snodoubtWell,that'sodd.IcouldhaveswornGaryAitkenheadofPortonDowntoldSkyNewsthattheprecisesource"ofthepoisoncouldnotbeidentified.Oneofthesemeniswrong.Coulditbethescientistwhodealsincoldhardevidenceforaliving,orBritain,sDonaldTrumpcompletewithludicroushair,incomprehensibleoratoryandacasualrelationshipwiththefactsAfunctionalBritishpresswouldhaveinvestigatedwhetherourforeignsecretarymayhaveliedtotheworldabouttheactivitiesofanothercountry,butalasthemedia'sleadinglightsweretoobusyimplyingJeremyCorbyn'sattemptsaturgingcautionwereevidenceofsomekindofferventlackofpatriotismHerewehavetworesponsestoforeignpolicyoneisbasedonthecarefulexaminationoftheevidenceandemployingdiplomacy,theotherinvolvesrushingheadlongintoacontlictwithaheavilyarmedsuperpower.Theforeignsecretaryhasoptedforthesecondoption,beingcarelesswiththefactsinordertoachieveit.Thefirst-theonewecannowperhapsagreeispreferable--wasderidedbymuchofthemedia,theTories,andLabour'sself-styledmoderatesasbeingdisunitedandunseriousInevitably,RussiahasclutcheditsnationalpearlsoverthecommentsfromPortonDownandaccusationsofsuchaheinousact,andtensionswithBritainhaveescalated.andyetBorisJohnson,whowasgleefullystokingthefirejusttwoweeksago,remainsinpost.Surelyoneofthemostbasicrequirementsofbeingforeignsecretaryisnotlyingontheinternationalstageanddeterioratingrelationswithothercountries?TherearenumerouspossiblereasonsforJohnson'sTeflon-likequalities.Perhapstheprivilegeofrichwhitemenreallyissopervasivethattheycanliterallydowhatevertheyfeellikeandnotsufferanyconsequences.Perhapsthereasonit'ssohardtoshameJohnsonisthatheappearstolackthecapacitytofeelshame.Inanycase,astrawmustsurelybreakthecamel'sback-anditmayaswellbethis.Iflyingtothecountryaboutsomethingsoseriousdoesn'treturnJohnsontothebackbenches,whatwillittake?

50.Let’sstartbyrevisitingBorisJohnsonsinterviewwithDeutscheWellelastmonth,onwhetherthepoisonusedintheSalisburyattackcamefromRussia:BorisJohnson:Letmebeclearwithyou.WhenIlookattheevidence,ImeanthepeoplefromPortonDown.thelaboratoryDeutscheWelle:SotheyhavethesamplesBorisJohnson:Theydo.AndtheywereabsolutelycategoricalandIaskedtheguymyself,Isaid“Areyousure?”Andhesaidthere'snodoubtWell,that'sodd.IcouldhaveswornGaryAitkenheadofPortonDowntoldSkyNewsthattheprecisesource"ofthepoisoncouldnotbeidentified.Oneofthesemeniswrong.Coulditbethescientistwhodealsincoldhardevidenceforaliving,orBritain,sDonaldTrumpcompletewithludicroushair,incomprehensibleoratoryandacasualrelationshipwiththefactsAfunctionalBritishpresswouldhaveinvestigatedwhetherourforeignsecretarymayhaveliedtotheworldabouttheactivitiesofanothercountry,butalasthemedia'sleadinglightsweretoobusyimplyingJeremyCorbyn'sattemptsaturgingcautionwereevidenceofsomekindofferventlackofpatriotismHerewehavetworesponsestoforeignpolicyoneisbasedonthecarefulexaminationoftheevidenceandemployingdiplomacy,theotherinvolvesrushingheadlongintoacntlictwithaheavilyarmedsuperpower.Theforeignsecretaryhasoptedforthesecondoption,beingcarelesswiththefactsinordertoachieveit.Thefirst-theonewecannowperhapsagreeispreferable--wasderidedbymuchofthemedia,theTories,andLabour'sself-styledmoderatesasbeingdisunitedandunseriousInevitably,RussiahasclutcheditsnationalpearlsoverthecommentsfromPortonDownandaccusationsofsuchaheinousact,andtensionswithBritainhaveescalated.andyetBorisJohnson,whowasgleefullystokingthefirejusttwoweeksago,remainsinpost.Surelyoneofthemostbasicrequirementsofbeingforeignsecretaryisnotlyingontheinternationalstageanddeterioratingrelationswithothercountries?TherearenumerouspossiblereasonsforJohnson'sTeflon-likequalities.Perhapstheprivilegeofrichwhitemenreallyissopervasivethattheycanliterallydowhatevertheyfeellikeandnotsufferanyconsequences.Perhapsthereasonit'ssohardtoshameJohnsonisthatheappearstolackthecapacitytofeelshame.Inanycase,astrawmustsurelybreakthecamel'sback-anditmayaswellbethis.Iflyingtothecountryaboutsomethingsoseriousdoesn'treturnJohnsontothebackbenches,whatwillittake?

51.Let’sstartbyrevisitingBorisJohnsonsinterviewwithDeutscheWellelastmonth,onwhetherthepoisonusedintheSalisburyattackcamefromRussia:BorisJohnson:Letmebeclearwithyou.WhenIlookattheevidence,ImeanthepeoplefromPortonDown.thelaboratoryDeutscheWelle:SotheyhavethesamplesBorisJohnson:Theydo.AndtheywereabsolutelycategoricalandIaskedtheguymyself,Isaid“Areyousure?”Andhesaidthere'snodoubtWell,that'sodd.IcouldhaveswornGaryAitkenheadofPortonDowntoldSkyNewsthattheprecisesource"ofthepoisoncouldnotbeidentified.Oneofthesemeniswrong.Coulditbethescientistwhodealsincoldhardevidenceforaliving,orBritain,sDonaldTrumpcompletewithludicroushair,incomprehensibleoratoryandacasualrelationshipwiththefactsAfunctionalBritishpresswouldhaveinvestigatedwhetherourforeignsecretarymayhaveliedtotheworldabouttheactivitiesofanothercountry,butalasthemedia'sleadinglightsweretoobusyimplyingJeremyCorbyn'sattemptsaturgingcautionwereevidenceofsomekindofferventlackofpatriotismHerewehavetworesponsestoforeignpolicyoneisbasedonthecarefulexaminationoftheevidenceandemployingdiplomacy,theotherinvolvesrushingheadlongintoacontlictwithaheavilyarmedsuperpower.Theforeignsecretaryhasoptedforthesecondoption,beingcarelesswiththefactsinordertoachieveit.Thefirst-theonewecannowperhapsagreeispreferable--wasderidedbymuchoftemedia,theTories,andLabour'sself-styledmoderatesasbeingdisunitedandunseriousInevitably,RussiahasclutcheditsnationalpearlsoverthecommentsfromPortonDownandaccusationsofsuchaheinousact,andtensionswithBritainhaveescalated.andyetBorisJohnson,whowasgleefullystokingthefirejusttwoweeksago,remainsinpost.Surelyoneofthemostbasicrequirementsofbeingforeignsecretaryisnotlyingontheinternationalstageanddeterioratingrelationswithothercountries?TherearenumerouspossiblereasonsforJohnson'sTeflon-likequalities.Perhapstheprivilegeofrichwhitemenreallyissopervasivethattheycanliterallydowhatevertheyfeellikeandnotsufferanyconsequences.Perhapsthereasonit'ssohardtoshameJohnsonisthatheappearstolackthecapacitytofeelshame.Inanycase,astrawmustsurelybreakthecamel'sback-anditmayaswellbethis.Iflyingtothecountryaboutsomethingsoseriousdoesn'treturnJohnsontothebackbenches,whatwillittake?

52.Let’sstartbyrevisitingBorisJohnsonsinterviewwithDeutscheWellelastmonth,onwhetherthepoisonusedintheSalisburyattackcamefromRussia:BorisJohnson:Letmebeclearwithyou.WhenIlookattheevidence,ImeanthepeoplefromPortonDown.thelaboratoryDeutscheWelle:SotheyhavethesamplesBorisJohnson:Theydo.AndtheywereabsolutelycategoricalandIaskedtheguymyself,Isaid“Areyousure?”Andhesaidthere'snodoubtWell,that'sodd.IcouldhaveswornGaryAitkenheadofPortonDowntoldSkyNewsthattheprecisesource"ofthepoisoncouldnotbeidentified.Oneofthesemeniswrong.Coulditbethescientistwhodealsincoldhardevidenceforaliving,orBritain,sDonaldTrumpcompletewithludicroushair,incomprehensibleoratoryandacasualrelationshipwiththefactsAfunctionalBritishpresswouldhaveinvestigatedwhetherourforeignsecretarymayhaveliedtotheworldabouttheactivitiesofanothercountry,butalasthemedia'sleadinglightsweretoobusyimplyingJeremyCorbyn'sattemptsaturgingcautionwereevidenceofsomekindofferventlackofpatriotismHerewehavetworesponsestoforeignpolicyoneisbasedonthecarefulexaminationoftheevidenceandemployingdiplomacy,theotherinvolvesrushingheadlongintoacontlictwithaheavilyarmedsuperpower.Theforeignsecretaryhasoptedforthesecondoption,beingcarelesswiththefactsinordertoachieveit.Thefirst-theonewecannowperhapsagreeispreferable--wasderidedbymuchofthemedia,theTories,andLabour'sself-styledmoderatesasbeingdisunitedandunseriousInevitably,RussiahasclutcheditsnationalpearlsoverthecommentsfromPortonDownandaccusationsofsuchaheinousact,andtensionswithBritainhaveescalated.andyetBorisJohnson,whowasgleefullystokingthefirejusttwoweeksago,remainsinpost.Surelyoneofthemostbasicrequirementsofbeingforeignsecretaryisnotlyingontheinternationalstageanddeterioratingrelationswithothercountries?TherearenumerouspossiblereasonsforJohnson'sTeflon-likequalities.Perhapsteprivilegeofrichwhitemenreallyissopervasivethattheycanliterallydowhatevertheyfeellikeandnotsufferanyconsequences.Perhapsthereasonit'ssohardtoshameJohnsonisthatheappearstolackthecapacitytofeelshame.Inanycase,astrawmustsurelybreakthecamel'sback-anditmayaswellbethis.Iflyingtothecountryaboutsomethingsoseriousdoesn'treturnJohnsontothebackbenches,whatwillittake?

53.Let’sstartbyrevisitingBorisJohnsonsinterviewwithDeutscheWellelastmonth,onwhetherthepoisonusedintheSalisburyattackcamefromRussia:BorisJohnson:Letmebeclearwithyou.WhenIlookattheevidence,ImeanthepeoplefromPortonDown.thelaboratoryDeutscheWelle:SotheyhavethesamplesBorisJohnson:Theydo.AndtheywereabsolutelycategoricalandIaskedtheguymyself,Isaid“Areyousure?”Andhesaidthere'snodoubtWell,that'sodd.IcouldhaveswornGaryAitkenheadofPortonDowntoldSkyNewsthattheprecisesource"ofthepoisoncouldnotbeidentified.Oneofthesemeniswrong.Coulditbethescientistwhodealsincoldhardevidenceforaliving,orBritain,sDonaldTrumpcompletewithludicroushair,incomprehensibleoratoryandacasualrelationshipwiththefacts.AfunctionalBritishpresswouldhaveinvestigatedwhetherourforeignsecretarymayhaveliedtotheworldabouttheactivitiesofanothercountry,butalasthemedia'sleadinglightsweretoobusyimplyingJeremyCorbyn'sattemptsaturgingcautionwereevidenceofsomekindofferventlackofpatriotismHerewehavetworesponsestoforeignpolicyoneisbasedonthecarefulexaminationoftheevidenceandemploy

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论