版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
11ManagingEconomiesofScaleinaSupplyChain:CycleInventoryLearningObjectivesBalancetheappropriatecoststochoosetheoptimallotsizeandcycleinventoryinasupplychain.Understandtheimpactofquantitydiscountsonlotsizeandcycleinventory.Deviseappropriatediscountingschemesforasupplychain.Understandtheimpactoftradepromotionsonlotsizeandcycleinventory.Identifymanagerialleversthatreducelotsizeandcycleinventoryinasupplychainwithoutincreasingcost.RoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainLotorbatchsizeisthequantitythatastageofasupplychaineitherproducesorpurchasesatatimeCycleinventoryistheaverageinventoryinasupplychainduetoeitherproductionorpurchasesinlotsizesthatarelargerthanthosedemandedbythecustomer Q:Quantityinalotorbatchsize
D:DemandperunittimeInventoryProfileFigure11-1RoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainAverageflowtimeresultingfromcycleinventoryRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainLowercycleinventoryhasShorteraverageflowtimeLowerworkingcapitalrequirementsLowerinventoryholdingcostsCycleinventoryisheldtoTakeadvantageofeconomiesofscaleReducecostsinthesupplychainRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainAveragepricepaidperunitpurchasedisakeycostinthelot-sizingdecision Materialcost=CFixedorderingcostincludesallcoststhatdonotvarywiththesizeoftheorderbutareincurredeachtimeanorderisplaced Fixedorderingcost=SHoldingcostisthecostofcarryingoneunitininventoryforaspecifiedperiodoftime Holdingcost=H=hCRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainPrimaryroleofcycleinventoryistoallowdifferentstagestopurchaseproductinlotsizesthatminimizethesumofmaterial,ordering,andholdingcostsIdeally,cycleinventorydecisionsshouldconsidercostsacrosstheentiresupplychainInpractice,eachstagegenerallymakesitsownsupplychaindecisionsIncreasestotalcycleinventoryandtotalcostsinthesupplychainRoleofCycleInventory
inaSupplyChainEconomiesofscaleexploitedinthreetypicalsituationsAfixedcostisincurredeachtimeanorderisplacedorproducedThesupplierofferspricediscountsbasedonthequantitypurchasedperlotThesupplieroffersshort-termpricediscountsorholdstradepromotionsEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeInventoryHoldingCostCostofcapitalwhere
E =amountofequity
D =amountofdebt
Rf =risk-freerateofreturn
b =thefirm’sbeta
MRP =marketriskpremium
Rb =rateatwhichthefirmcanborrowmoney
t =taxrateInventoryHoldingCostCostofcapitalEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeAdjustedforpre-taxsettingEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeInventoryHoldingCostObsolescencecostHandlingcostOccupancycostMiscellaneouscostsTheft,security,damage,tax,insuranceEstimatingCycleInventoryRelatedCostsinPracticeOrderingCostBuyertimeTransportationcostsReceivingcostsOthercostsEconomiesofScale
toExploitFixedCostsLotsizingforasingleproduct(EOQ) D
= Annualdemandoftheproduct S
=
Fixedcostincurredperorder C
=
Costperunit H
=
HoldingcostperyearasafractionofproductcostBasicassumptionsDemandissteadyatD
unitsperunittimeNoshortagesareallowedReplenishmentleadtimeisfixedEconomiesofScale
toExploitFixedCostsMinimizeAnnualmaterialcostAnnualorderingcostAnnualholdingcostLotSizingforaSingleProductLotSizingforaSingleProductFigure11-2LotSizingforaSingleProductTheeconomicorderquantity(EOQ)TheoptimalorderingfrequencyEOQExampleAnnualdemand,D=1,000x12=12,000unitsOrdercostperlot,S=$4,000Unitcostpercomputer,C=$500Holdingcostperyearasafractionofunitcost,h=0.2EOQExampleEOQExampleLotsizereducedtoQ=200unitsLotSizeandOrderingCostIfthelotsizeQ*=200,howmuchshouldtheorderingcostbereduced?Desiredlotsize,Q*=200Annualdemand,D=1,000×12=12,000unitsUnitcostpercomputer,C=$500Holdingcostperyearasafractionofinventoryvalue,h=0.2ProductionLotSizingTheentirelotdoesnotarriveatthesametimeProductionoccursataspecifiedratePInventorybuildsupatarateofP
–DAnnualsetupcostAnnualholdingcostAggregatingMultipleProducts
inaSingleOrderSavingsintransportationcostsReducesfixedcostforeachproductLotsizeforeachproductcanbereducedCycleinventoryisreducedSingledeliveryfrommultiplesuppliersorsingletruckdeliveringtomultipleretailersReceivingandloadingcostsreducedLotSizingwithMultiple
ProductsorCustomersOrdering,transportation,andreceivingcostsgrowwiththevarietyofproductsorpickuppointsLotsizesandorderingpolicythatminimizetotalcost
Di: Annualdemandforproducti
S: Ordercostincurredeachtimeanorderisplaced,independentofthevarietyofproductsintheorder
si: Additionalordercostincurredifproducti
isincludedintheorderLotSizingwithMultiple
ProductsorCustomersThreeapproachesEachproductmanagerordershisorhermodelindependentlyTheproductmanagersjointlyordereveryproductineachlotProductmanagersorderjointlybutnoteveryordercontainseveryproduct;thatis,eachlotcontainsaselectedsubsetoftheproductsMultipleProductsOrderedandDeliveredIndependentlyDemand
DL
=12,000/yr,DM
=1,200/yr,DH
=120/yrCommonordercost
S
=$4,000Product-specificordercost
sL
=$1,000,sM
=$1,000,sH=$1,000Holdingcost
h
=0.2Unitcost
CL
=$500,CM=$500,CH=$500MultipleProductsOrderedandDeliveredIndependentlyLiteproMedproHeavyproDemandperyear12,0001,200120Fixedcost/order$5,000$5,000$5,000Optimalordersize1,095346110Cycleinventory54817355Annualholdingcost$54,772$17,321$5,477Orderfrequency11.0/year3.5/year1.1/yearAnnualorderingcost$54,772$17,321$5,477Averageflowtime2.4weeks7.5weeks23.7weeksAnnualcost$109,544$34,642$10,954Table11-1Totalannualcost=$155,140LotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyProductsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyAnnualordercost=9.75x7,000=$68,250Annualorderingandholdingcost =$61,512+$6,151+$615+$68,250 =$136,528ProductsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyLiteproMedproHeavyproDemandperyear(D)12,0001,200120Orderfrequency(n∗)9.75/year9.75/year9.75/yearOptimalordersize(D/n∗)1,23012312.3Cycleinventory61561.56.15Annualholdingcost$61,512$6,151$615Averageflowtime2.67weeks2.67weeks2.67weeksTable11-2AggregationwithCapacityConstraintW.W.Graingerexample
Demandperproduct,Di
=10,000 Holdingcost,h
=
0.2 Unitcostperproduct,Ci
=
$50 Commonordercost,S
=
$500 Supplier-specificordercost,si
=
$100AggregationwithCapacityConstraintAnnualholdingcostpersupplierAggregationwithCapacityConstraintTotalrequiredcapacitypertruck=4x671=2,684unitsTruckcapacity=2,500unitsOrderquantityfromeachsupplier=2,500/4=625Orderfrequencyincreasedto10,000/625=16Annualordercostpersupplierincreasesto$3,600Annualholdingcostpersupplierdecreasesto$3,125.LotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyforaSelectedSubsetStep1: IdentifythemostfrequentlyorderedproductassumingeachproductisorderedindependentlyStep2: Forallproductsi≠
i*,evaluatetheorderingfrequencyLotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyforaSelectedSubsetStep3: Foralli≠
i*,evaluatethefrequencyofproducti
relativetothemostfrequentlyorderedproducti*tobemiStep4: Recalculatetheorderingfrequencyofthemostfrequentlyorderedproducti*tobenLotsOrderedandDeliveredJointlyforaSelectedSubsetStep5: Evaluateanorderfrequencyofni=n/mi
andthetotalcostofsuchanorderingpolicyTailoredaggregation–higher-demandproductsorderedmorefrequentlyandlower-demandproductsorderedlessfrequentlyOrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderApplyingStep1ThusOrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderApplyingStep2ApplyingStep3OrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderLiteproMedproHeavyproDemandperyear(D)12,0001,200120Orderfrequency(n∗)11.47/year5.74/year2.29/yearOptimalordersize(D/n∗)1,04620952Cycleinventory523104.526Annualholdingcost$52,307$10,461$2,615Averageflowtime2.27weeks4.53weeks11.35weeksTable11-3OrderedandDeliveredJointly–FrequencyVariesbyOrderApplyingStep4ApplyingStep5Annualordercost Totalannualcost$130,767EconomiesofScaleto
ExploitQuantityDiscountsLotsize-baseddiscount–discountsbasedonquantityorderedinasinglelotVolumebaseddiscount–
discountisbasedontotalquantitypurchasedoveragivenperiodTwocommonschemesAll-unitquantitydiscountsMarginalunitquantitydiscountormulti-blocktariffsQuantityDiscountsTwobasicquestionsWhatistheoptimalpurchasingdecisionforabuyerseekingtomaximizeprofits?Howdoesthisdecisionaffectthesupplychainintermsoflotsizes,cycleinventories,andflowtimes?Underwhatconditionsshouldasupplierofferquantitydiscounts?Whatareappropriatepricingschedulesthatasupplierseekingtomaximizeprofitsshouldoffer?All-UnitQuantityDiscountsPricingschedulehasspecifiedquantitybreakpointsq0,q1,…,qr,whereq0=0Ifanorderisplacedthatisatleastaslargeasqibutsmallerthanqi+1,theneachunithasanaverageunitcostofCiUnitcostgenerallydecreasesasthequantityincreases,i.e.,C0>C1>…>Cr
Objectiveistodecideonalotsizethatwillminimizethesumofmaterial,order,andholdingcostsAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsFigure11-3All-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep1: EvaluatetheoptimallotsizeforeachpriceCi,0≤i≤rasfollowsAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep2: WenextselecttheorderquantityQ*iforeachpriceCi1.2.3.Case3canbeignoredasitisconsideredforQi+1ForCase1if,thensetQ*i=QiIf,thenadiscountisnotpossibleSetQ*i =qitoqualifyforthediscountedpriceofCiAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep3: CalculatethetotalannualcostoforderingQ*iunitsAll-UnitQuantityDiscountsStep4: SelectQ*iwiththelowesttotalcostTCiCutoffpriceAll-UnitQuantityDiscountExampleOrderQuantityUnitPrice0–4,999$3.005,000–9,999$2.9610,000ormore$2.92q0=0,q1=5,000,q2=10,000C0=$3.00,C1=$2.96,C2=$2.92D=120,000/year,S=$100/lot,h=0.2All-UnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep1Step2Ignorei=0becauseQ0=6,324>q1=5,000Fori=1,2All-UnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep3Lowesttotalcostisfori=2Order
bottlesperlotat$2.92perbottleMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsMulti-blocktariffs–themarginalcostofaunitthatdecreasesatabreakpointForeachvalueofi,0
≤i≤r,letVi
bethecostoforderingqi
unitsMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsFigure11-4MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsMaterialcostofeachorderQ
isVi+(Q–qi)CiTotalannualcostMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsStep1: EvaluatetheoptimallotsizeforeachpriceCiMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsStep2: SelecttheorderquantityQi*foreachpriceCi1.2.3.MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountsStep3: CalculatethetotalannualcostoforderingQi*Step4: SelecttheordersizeQi*withthelowesttotalcostTCiMarginalUnitQuantityDiscountExampleOriginaldatanowamarginaldiscountOrderQuantityUnitPrice0–4,999$3.005,000–9,999$2.9610,000ormore$2.92q0=0,q1=5,000,q2=10,000C0=$3.00,C1=$2.96,C2=$2.92D=120,000/year,S=$100/lot,h=0.2MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep1MarginalUnitQuantityDiscountExampleStep2Step3WhyQuantityDiscounts?QuantitydiscountscanincreasethesupplychainsurplusforthefollowingtwomainreasonsImprovedcoordinationtoincreasetotalsupplychainprofitsExtractionofsurplusthroughpricediscriminationQuantityDiscountsforCommodityProductsD=120,000bottles/year,SR
=$100,hR
=0.2,CR
=$3SM
=$250,hM
=0.2,CM
=$2Annualsupplychaincost(manufacturer+DO)=$6,009+$3,795=$9,804LocallyOptimalLotSizesAnnualcostforDOandmanufacturerAnnualsupplychaincost(manufacturer+DO)=$5,106+$4,059=$9,165DesigningaSuitableLotSize-BasedQuantityDiscountDesignasuitablequantitydiscountthatgetsDOtoorderinlotsof9,165unitswhenitsaimstominimizeonlyitsowntotalcostsManufacturerneedstoofferanincentiveofatleast$264peryeartoDOintermsofdecreasedmaterialcostifDOordersinlotsof9,165unitsAppropriatequantitydiscountis$3ifDOordersinlotssmallerthan9,165unitsand$2.9978forordersof9,165ormoreQuantityDiscountsWhen
FirmHasMarketPowerDemandcurve=360,000–60,000pProductioncost=CM=$2perbottleptomaximizeProfRQuantityDiscountsWhen
FirmHasMarketPowerCR=$4perbottle,p=$5perbottleTotalmarketdemand=360,000–60,000p=60,000ProfR
=(5–4)(360,000–60,000×5)=$60,000ProfM=(4–2)(360,000–60,000×5)=$120,000ProfSC=(p–CM)(360,000–60,000p)CoordinatedretailpriceProfSC=($4–$2)x120,000=$240,000Two-PartTariffManufacturerchargesitsentireprofitasanup-frontfranchisefeeff
SellstotheretaileratcostRetailpricingdecisionisbasedonmaximizingitsprofitsEffectivelymaximizesthecoordinatedsupplychainprofitVolume-BasedQuantityDiscountsDesignavolume-baseddiscountschemethatgetstheretailertopurchaseandsellthequantitysoldwhenthetwostagescoordinatetheiractionsLessonsfromDiscountingSchemesQuantitydiscountsplayaroleinsupplychaincoordinationandimprovedsupplychainprofitsDiscountschemesthatareoptimalarevolumebasedandnotlotsizebasedunlessthemanufacturerhaslargefixedcostsassociatedwitheachlotEveninthepresenceoflargefixedcostsforthemanufacturer,atwo-parttarifforvolume-baseddiscount,withthemanufacturerpassingonsomeofthefixedcosttotheretailer,optimallycoordinatesthesupplychainandmaximizesprofitsLessonsfromDiscountingSchemesLotsize–baseddiscountstendtoraisethecycleinventoryinthesupplychainVolume-baseddiscountsarecompatiblewithsmalllotsthatreducecycleinventoryRetailerswilltendtoincreasethesizeofthelottowardtheendoftheevaluationperiod,thehockeystickphenomenonWithmultipleretailerswithdifferentdemandcurves
optimaldiscountcontinuestobevolumebasedwiththeaveragepricechargedtotheretailersdecreasingastherateofpurchaseincreasesPriceDiscriminationtoMaximizeSupplierProfitsFirmchargesdifferentialpricestomaximizeprofitsSettingafixedpriceforallunitsdoesnotmaximizeprofitsforthemanufacturerManufacturercanobtainmaximumprofitsbypricingeachunitdifferentlybasedoncustomers’marginalevaluationateachquantityQuantitydiscountsareonemechanismforpricediscriminationbecausecustomerspaydifferentpricesbasedonthequantitypurchasedShort-TermDiscounting:
TradePromotionsTradepromotionsarepricediscountsforalimitedperiodoftimeKeygoalsInduceretailerstousepricediscounts,displays,oradvertisingtospursalesShiftinventoryfromthemanufacturertotheretailerandthecustomerDefendabrandagainstcompetitionShort-TermDiscounting:
TradePromotionsImpactonthebehavioroftheretailerandsupplychainperformanceRetailerhastwoprimaryoptionsPassthroughsomeorallofthepromotiontocustomerstospursalesPassthroughverylittleofthepromotiontocustomersbutpurchaseingreaterquantityduringthepromotionperiodtoexploitthetemporaryreductioninprice(forwardbuy)ForwardBuyingInventoryProfileFigure11-5ForwardBuyCoststobeconsidered–materialcost,holdingcost,andordercostThreeassumptionsThediscountisofferedonce,withnofuturediscountsTheretailertakesnoactiontoinfluencecustomerdemandAnalyzeaperiodoverwhichthedemandisanintegermultipleofQ*ForwardBuyOptimalorderquantityRetailersareoftenawareofthetimingofthenextpromotionImpactofTradePromotions
onLotSizesQ*=6,324bottles,C=$3perbottled=$0.15,D=120,000,h=0.2 CycleinventoryatDO =Q*/2=6,324/2=3,162bottles Averageflowtime =Q*/2D=6,324/(2D)=0.3162monthsImpactofTradePromotions
onLotSizes CycleinventoryatDO =Qd/2=38,236/2=19,118bottles Averageflowtime =Qd/2D=38,236/(20,000) =1.9118monthsWithtradepromotionsForwardbuy=Qd–Q*=38,236–6,324=31,912bottlesHowMuchofaDiscountShouldtheRetailerPassThrough?ProfitsfortheretailerProfR=(300,000–60,000p)p–(300,000–60,000p)CROptimalpricep=(300,000+60,000CR)/120,000DemandwithnopromotionDR=30,000–60,000p=60,000Optimalpricewithdiscountp=(300,000+60,000x2.85)/120,000=$3.925DR=300,000-60,000p=64,500DemandwithpromotionTradePromotionsTradepromotionsgenerallyincreasecycleinventoryinasupplychainandhurtperformanceCountermeasuresEDLP(everydaylowpricing)Discountappliestoitemssoldtocustomers(sell-through)notthequantitypurchasedbytheretailer(sell-in)ScanbasedpromotionsManagingMultiechelon
CycleInventoryMulti-echelonsupplychainshavemultiplestageswithpossiblymanyplayersateachstageLackofcoordinationinlotsizingdecisionsacrossthesupplychainresultsinhighcostsandmorecycleinventorythanrequiredThegoalistodecreasetotalcostsbycoordinatingordersacrossthesupplychainManagingMultiechelon
CycleInventoryFigure11-6IntegerReplenishmentPolicyDivideallpartieswithinastageintogroupssuchthatallpartieswithinagrouporderfromthesamesupplierandhaveth
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 茶叶加盟代理方案
- 重庆财经学院《建筑工程制图与识图》2021-2022学年第一学期期末试卷
- 茶叶会所经营方案
- 茶叶 发酵 研究报告
- 重庆财经学院《钢筋混凝土结构原理》2022-2023学年第一学期期末试卷
- 重庆财经学院《大数据采集与预处理技术》2022-2023学年期末试卷
- 百泉船房基加固施工方案
- 白山钢结构夹层施工方案
- 仲恺农业工程学院《文化教育空间设计》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 四年级数学(小数加减运算)计算题专项练习与答案汇编
- 医疗垃圾分类处置含内容
- 2023年度微博汽车行业生态结构解析及热点价值洞察
- 仓库异常情况处理方案三篇
- 高中数学竞赛平面几何讲座
- 建筑设计服务合同
- 中国太平洋财产保险股份有限公司家庭光伏发电设备财产保险附加第三者责任保险
- 联想绩效管理案例分析
- 医学论文投稿与评价指标
- 大学生创新创业项目商业计划书(完整)(可编辑)
- 思政示范课程-机械零部件测绘项目申报书
- 护理质控中心工作汇报
评论
0/150
提交评论