AEPerformanceEvaluation-Illinois：AE绩效评估-伊利诺斯

1、.State of IllinoisCAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BOARDA/E - PEARCHITECT/ENGINEERPERFORMANCE EVALUATIONCDB Project #:Firm Evaluated:Project:Firm ID # Prime ConsultantLocation:Address:Prepared by:Title:Contract #Affiliation: Contractor User PMTotal Contract Amt:Evaluation: Design-50% Design-100%Date Evaluation C

2、ompleted: Interim Construction/Close-outPART I - PERFORMANCEPHASEEVALUATION CRITERIAEVALUATION SCORING:“To what level.”Rate the firm with scores 5 through 1. 5 = Excellent; 4 = Good; 3 = Satisfactory; 2 = Less than Satisfactory; 1 = Unacceptable. N/A = Not Applicable. Comments are required if any sc

3、ore is less than 3.:Design1.did the contract documents meet the specific requirements of the project scope?2.did the contract documents comply with applicable design requirements in the PSA and DCM?3.did the A/E maintain the design schedule in the Professional Services Agreement, Appendix A?4.was th

4、e completeness of the design document, including estimates, at each review submittal?5.was the A/E prepared at meetings?6.was the accuracy of the A/Es entire project estimate compared to the total of the apparent low bids?7.were the contract documents significantly changed by addenda?8.did the A/E p

5、rovide accurate and timely design meeting minutes?9.did the A/E produce a set of bid documents coordinating all design disciplines?Construction10.were the contractors pay requests accurately reviewed for completeness and processed in a timely manner?11.did the A/E provide accurate and timely constru

6、ction meeting minutes?12.did the A/E provide competent site observation including timely and accurate observation reports?13.were shop drawings, RFIs and RFP/COs responded to, researched, evaluated and promptly processed?14.was the degree of errors and omissions as they relate to CDB limits?15.did t

7、he A/E respond to issues in a timely manner?16.did the A/E follow proper procedures during the contractors final close-out?17.were the A/Es close-out documents submitted in an accurate and timely manner?Design/Construction18.did the A/E utilize the personnel and consultants as submitted on their 255

8、 form?19.did the A/E coordinate cooperate and communicate with CDB, the User and the contractors?PART II PROCESSING (CDB USE ONLY)CDB PROJECT MANAGERDATE:REVIEWED/REGIONAL MANAGERDATE:DISTRIBUTION BY:DATE:DISTRIBUTION:A/E A/E Responsibility File December 2005Each A/E firm performing services for CDB

9、 shall be subject to periodic and final performance evaluations. All evaluations shall be submitted on the current CDBs A/E Performance Evaluation Form. Interim evaluations may be initiated at any time. A/E Performance Evaluations are a key component in determining an A/Es Responsibility Rating.Part

10、 I will be used to indicate the firms overall performance progress to date.Part II is for CDBs use only. Copies of all evaluations will be forwarded to the A/E firm by CDB.The A/E firm may respond to any evaluation by corresponding directly to the CDB. Responses will be reviewed and permanently retained with the corresponding evaluation. E-MAIL THIS FORM:This form may be submitted to CDB electronically. Attach a completed form to an e-mail addressed to the CD