改良Stoppa入路的内固定术与外固定架治疗骨盆前环骨折的疗效比较

-精选财经经济类资料- -最新财经经济资料-感谢阅读- 1 改良 Stoppa 入路的内固定术与外固 定架治疗骨盆前环骨折的疗效比较 摘要 目的 比较改良 Stoppa 入 路的内固定与外固定架治疗骨盆前环骨 折的临床疗效。 方法 选择 2012 年 1 月2016 年 6 月在我院治疗的骨盆前环 骨折患者 80 例的临床资料进行回顾性 分析。其中 40 例患者采用外固定架治 疗为外固定架组，40 例患者采用改良 Stoppa 入路内固定治疗为内固定组。比 较两组骨折复位质量、临床疗效、手术 切口长度、平均手术时间、平均术中出 血量、骨折愈合时间、并发症发生率。 结果 内固定组平均手术切口长度较外 固定组长，术中出血量较外固定组多， 差异有统计学意义（P0.05） 。 结论 改 -精选财经经济类资料- -最新财经经济资料-感谢阅读- 2 良 Stoppa 入路的内固定治疗骨盆前环骨 折与外固定架比较创伤较大，但骨折复 位质量更好，临床疗效更佳。 中国论文网 /6/view-12944210.htm P 键词 改良 Stoppa 入路；内 固定；外固定架；骨盆前环骨折 中图分类号 R683.3 文献标识 码 B 文章编号 1673-9701（2017）13- 0068-03 Abstract Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between internal fixation via modified Stoppa approach and external fixator in the treatment of pelvic fracture. Methods The clinical data of 80 patients with pelvic fracture of the anterior ring treated in our hospital from January 2012 to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. 40 patients underwent external fixation and were chosen as external fixation group， and 40 patients underwent modified Stoppa approach for internal fixation and were selected as the -精选财经经济类资料- -最新财经经济资料-感谢阅读- 3 internal fixation group.The fracture reduction quality， clinical efficacy，the length of the incision， the average operative time， the average intraoperative blood loss， the time of fracture healing and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. Results The average length of the incision in the internal fixation group was longer than that in the external fixation group， and the amount of bleeding in the internal group was more than that of the external fixation group， the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）. Conclusion The internal fixation with modified Stoppa approach is superior to the external fixator in the treatment of pelvic fracture of the anterior ring， but the fracture reduction quality and