案例手册2008 2009小灶计划_第1页
案例手册2008 2009小灶计划_第2页
案例手册2008 2009小灶计划_第3页
案例手册2008 2009小灶计划_第4页
案例手册2008 2009小灶计划_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩77页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

DardenConsultingCasebook

2008-2009

Acknowledgements

Thefollowingindividualscontributedcasestothecasebookandwithouttheirtimeandeffortthiscasebookwouldnotbepossible.

GordonAvery–Classof2009

ArupBhattacharjee-Classof2009

MatthewConnor-Classof2009

MatthewHeim–Classof2009

Arnon(Arnie)Katz–Classof2009

JamesMitchell–Classof2008

MichaelMurphy–Classof2009

ShankarRaja–Classof2009

AnandRao–Classof2009

Yuan(York)Zhong-

Classof2008

2

CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW

BikeDVDRentalServiceinNYC

LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)

3

Question

Youfriendhasapproachedyouwithabusinessideaandwantsyouradvice.HewantstoopenaDVDRentalserviceinNewYorkCity,specificallyManhattan.DVDswouldbedeliveredtocustomersviadeliverypeopleonbicycles.Whatwouldyoutellyourfriend?

Note

Thiscasecombineselementsofwhatastudentmightseeinboth1stand2ndroundinterview.

ClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers

Providethefollowinganswersonlyiftheintervieweeasksthecorrespondingquestion.

Question

1.Whatkindofcompetitionexists?

Answer

AssumethatNetflixandcomparableservicesarenotavailable.Pushthestudenttocomeupwithlargechains(Blockbuster),localvideorentalstores,movietheaters,livetheater,etc.

Hewantstobreakevenwithin1year.

2.Whatisyourfriend’sacceptablebreakevenperiod?

5.WherewilltheDVDsbestored?

Theywillbestoredinyourfriend’sapartment(hehasplentyofspaceforthecollection).

Plan

ThisisaprimarilyaMarketSizingandProfitabilitycase,butalsoincludesotherelements..Theanalysismayinclude,butisnotlimitedto,thefollowingareas:

1.MarketSizingAnalysis(Detailsshowsinexcelsheetatend)

a.

EstimatethepopulationofManhattan–Pushthestudenttopickanumberaround2millionpeople.

EstimatetheaveragehouseholdsizeinManhattan–Pushthestudenttopick2(lowerthanthe3personaverageforthecountryduetoahighernumberofsingles)

EstimatetheportionofthehouseholdsthatyourfriendwillbeabletoservebasedonhavingonecentrallocationfortheDVDs–Pushthestudenttopick25%ofthepopulation.

Estimatethepercentageofthemarketthatyourfriend‟sservicewillcaptureinthefirstyear.–Pushthestudenttopickanumberaround1%.

b.

c.

d.

4

e. Estimatetherentalspermonth.Therecanbesomeflexibilityhere,butpushthestudenttomakeassumptionsthatyieldaround2,000movierentals/monthforyourfriend‟sbusiness

ProfitabilityandBreakeven

a. Givethefollowinginformationwhenasked

2.

i.

AssumeyourknowsomeonewhohasasizeableDVDcollectionthattheyarewillingtoselltoyouto$10,000.

Assumeyouhaveafriendwhocansetupawebsiteandmaintainitforyouforaone-timefeeof$10,000

VariablecosttodeliverDVDis$4(paybicycledeliveryperson).Assumeaninfinitesupplyofbicycledeliverypeople.

Chosepricesbetween$5and$8andcalculatethebreakeventimeinmonths(seeexcelsheetatend)

ii.

iii.

iv.

3.

Operationsanalysis

a.

b.

c.

Whattimeandwhatdayswouldyouoperateyourservice?

HowwouldDVDsbereturned(likelydroppedoffatcentrallocation)Howwilltheservicefunctioninthewintermonthsorwhenitrains?

4.

MarketingandAdvertisingAnalysis

a.

b.

c.

Whatisthecompetitiveadvantageofthisbusiness?Howwouldyouattractcustomers?

Howcanyouadvertiseeffectivelyandinexpensively?

5

Calculations

MarketAnalysis

Assumptions:

DVDs/Monthforyourfriend

2000

6

MarketBreakdown

Size

DVDs/Month

LowRenters

500

1

MediumRenters

250

2

HighRenters

250

4

PeopleinManhattan

2,000,000

People/Household

2

HouseholdsinManhattan

1,000,000

%ofpopulationthatcanbeserved

25%

%ofpopulationthatrentsregularly

40%

%ofmarketthatwecancapture

1%

MarketPotential(Households)

1,000

ProfitabilityAnalysis

Recommendation

Therecommendationshouldincludethefollowing:

1.

Theanswer–Basedonthemarketandprofitabilityanalysisalongwithmyfriendstargetofbreakingeveninlessthanayear,Iwouldrecommendthathegoesforwardwiththebusiness.

Thenumber(s)–Atapriceof$5,thefriendcanbreakeveninapproximately10months

Risksorconsiderations–Demandmightnotmaterialize,delivering60+videosviabicyclemightnotbepractical,andcompetitionsuchasinternetmoviescouldmaketheserviceobsolete.

Nextsteps–Purchasethevideocollection,setupthewebsite,andstartadvertising.

2.

3.

4.

QuestionstoFurtherChallengetheInterviewee

1.Whatchallengeswouldbefacedifyourfriendwantedtoexpandtheservicetoservemorecustomers?

7

Price/DVD

Breakeventime(months)

$5.00

10.0

$6.00

5.0

$7.00

3.3

$8.00

2.5

DVDCapitalCosts

10,000

WebsiteCosts

10,000

VariableDeliveryCosts

$4

CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW

DryWallCompetitiveThreat

LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)

8

9

Question

Ourclientisadrywallmanufacturerandisconcernedaboutanewplayercomingintothemarket.Thenewplayerisperceivedtobealowpriceplayerandourclientisconsideringloweringitspriceby10%.Theclientseeksouradviceregardingitsoptions.

Note

ThiscaseissimilartoacasethatastudentmayreceiveinafirstorsecondroundinterviewwithBCG/Bain.

ClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers

Providethefollowinganswersonlyiftheintervieweeasksthecorrespondingquestion.

Question

Howmanyproductsdoestheclientproduce?

Isthenewcompetitor’sproductsimilartoours?

Answer

One

Forpracticalpurposeswecanassumethatourproductissimilartothenewcompetitor’sproduct.

Forouranalysisassumeallthe“dry-wall”productsinthemarketaresimilar.

3.Howare“dry-wall”productsdifferentiated?

Plan

Thisisastrategy/competitivetypecase.Acomprehensiveplanshouldincludethefollowingareas:

5.

6.

7.

Client‟simpactofreducingpriceby10%

MarketStructure(Intermsofnumberofcompetitorsandtheirshare)Customer–

a.

b.

c.

Whoareourcustomers?TheirPreferences

PriceSensitivity

8.

NewCompetitor

a.

b.

c.

SizeStrength

Weaknesses

10

9.OurClient‟sposition

a.

b.

c.

MarketPosition

HowlongweareinthemarketBrandStrength

Question:Afterthecandidatelaysouthisorherplan,askthecandidatetoanalyzetheimpactof10%pricereductiononourclient‟sbottomline.

Whenthecandidateasksprovidethefollowinginformationregardingrevenueandcostsforourclient:

Numberofunitssold=100,000SellingPricePerUnit=$10VariableCostPerUnit=$3

AllocatedFixedCostPerUnit=$2

KeyAssumption:

Ifthecandidateasksregardingthevolumechangewiththepricecut,statethatthevolumewillremainsamewiththepricecut.Ifthecandidatedoesnotaskaboutthevolumechangeitisexpectedthatthecandidateexplicitlystatetheassumptionbeforeproceedingtothecalculation.

ExpectedCalculation:

TotalFixedCost=$100,000*$2=$200,000

Thisisakeyinsight,theallocatedfixedcostneedstobeconvertedintototalfixedcost.

OriginalCase

Revenue=$10*100,000=$1,000,000VariableCost=$3*100,000=$300,000

ContributionMargin=$1,000,000-$300,000=$700,000Profit=$700,000-$200,000=$500,000

PriceCutScenarioNewPrice=$9

Revenue=$9*100,000=$900,000VariableCost=$3*100,000=$300,000

ContributionMargin=$900,000-$300,000=$600,000

11

NewProfit=$600,000-$200,000=$400,000

Impactonbottomline=[(NewProfit–OldProfit)/(OldProfit)]

Impactonbottomline=($400,000-$500,000)/$500,000=-$100,000/$500,000=-20%

Thecandidateisexpectedtostatethattheimpactonthebottomlineis20%andthusismagnifiedcomparedtothe10%pricecut.

Question:Nowaskthecandidateifourclientmaintainsthepricehowmuchvolumeitpotentiallyneedstolosetomakeitequivalenttocuttingthepriceby10%.

Ifthecandidatetakestheinitiativeandexploresthisquestionthenitneedstobenotedandencouraged(thisdifferentiatesaverystrongcandidatefromothers)

ExpectedAnalysis:

Letthenewvolumeofunitstheclientsellsbe“x”.

Soiftheclientsells“x”units@$10,theprofitwouldbe:

Revenue=10*xVariableCost=3*xFixedCost=$200,000

Profit=10x-3x-$200,000

Aclassicmistakeistotakethecontributionperunitas$5(effectivelytreatingtheallocatedfixedcostasavariablecosttoo)andusing$5*xastheprofit.

Soforthisoptiontobeequivalenttocuttingthepriceby10%theequationwouldbe10x–3x–200,000=400,000

7x=600,000

x=600,000/7=85,700approx

Lossinmarketshare=(85,700-100,000)/100,000=14.3%

Itisexpectedthatthecandidateexplainswhatthis14.3%numberrepresents;expectedanswerwouldbethatthe14.3%isthemaximummarketshareourclientcanaffordtolosebeforetheoptionofcuttingpriceby10%appearstobeabetterchoice.

Acandidatecandifferentiatehimselforherselfbystatingthatkeyistoestimatehowmuchtheclientcanpotentiallyloseifitdoesnotreducepriceby10%.

Question:Nowaskthecandidatethatifourclientneedstomakeachoicebetweenthesetwooptionshowyouwouldhelpourclientmakethechoice.

Nowthecandidateisexpectedtomakeuseofhisorherplantohelpmakeadecision.Ifcandidateasksthefollowingquestionsprovidethefollowinginformation:

12

WhatistheMarketStructure?(Intermsofnumberofcompetitorsandtheirshare)

Answer:ShowExhbit1,withtheshares

WhatissizeoftheCompetitor?

Answer:Theyareasmalltomidsizeplayer

Whoareourcustomers?

Answer:Theyareprimarilycontractors/smallbusinessowners.Theybuydirectlyfromus.

WhatareourCustomer‟sPreferencesorhowpricesensitivetheyare?

Customersusuallybuybasedonrelationshipsandtheybuildpreferenceonaparticularbrand.Wedonothaveanyinformationregardingpricesensitivity.

Howdoweselltoourcustomers?

Wesellbasedontheirorders.Therearenolongtermcontracts.

Whatarethestrengthsofthenewcompetitor?

Answer:Notmuchinformation,theyareanewplayerinthemarket.Theyhavepresenceinothermarketourclientdoesnotcompetein.

Whataretheweaknessesofthenewcompetitor?

Answer:Notmuchinformation,theyareanewplayerinthemarket.Theyhavepresenceinothermarketourclientdoesnotcompetein.

Whatisourbrandstrength?

Answer:Asanumber3player,wehavestrongbrandpresenceandwehavebeeninthemarketforasignificantperiodoftime.

Howlongwehavebeeninthemarket?

Wehavebeeninthemarketforasignificantperiodoftime.

Istheremuchdifferentiationintheproduct?

Notmuch,forpracticalpurposesconsiderallproductstobesimilar.

13

KeyExpectedInsights

Basedontheinformationprovidedthecandidateisexpectedtocomeupwithatleastthefollowinginsights:

Drywallmarketisaveryfragmented,andweareadominantplayer

Consideringthesizeofthecompetitor,theywouldbeoneofthesmall30+1playersThatwouldmeanonanaveragethenewcompetitor‟smarketsharewouldbearound

o70/31=2.3%approx

NewCompetitorassumingfairsharedrawwouldtake2.3%ofourvolume,althoughonecanarguethattheymaynottakeanyvolumeandcompetewiththeothersmall/midsize30players

Question:Nowaskthecandidatetomaketherecommendation.

Recommendation

Therecommendationshouldincludethefollowing:

5.

Theanswer–Clientshouldnotreduceprice,becausethisisnotaseriousthreatandcuttingpriceinthismarketwouldleadtoapricewarwhereeveryonewouldlose.

Thenumber(s)–Reducingthepriceby10%wouldimpactprofitby20%.20%impactonprofitisequivalenttolosing14.3%marketshareatthecurrentpricelevelsandatmosttheclientcanlose2.5%volume.

6.

7.

Risksorconsiderations–

Wemightunderestimatethesizeorstrengthofthenewcompetitor(newcompetitormightbeboughtbyabiggerplayer)

Oneofthemajorcompetitors(AorB)mayhaveakneejerkreactionandreduceprice

Nextsteps–

Tomitigatesomeoftherisksourclientshouldaggressivelystrengthenitsclientbaseby

Providingadditionalservices

Tocreateabarrierforthenewcompetitortopoachourclient‟scustomers

Clientcanenterintolongtermcontractswithitscustomers

8.

14

c. EvenifAorBreducesitsprice,ourclientshouldmaintainpriceandaggressivelyprovidevalueaddedservicestothecustomers.

Exhibits

(CaseExhibitsshouldbeonaseparatesheetofpaperandincludedorattachedtotheendofthisdocument.Iftherearenoexhibits,includeanydatathattheinterviewermustprovide.)

120%

100%

12%

10%

8%

80%

A

60%

B

40%

Client

30otherplayers

70%

20%

0%

1

DryWallMarket

Exhibit1

15

CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW

OrganDonationCase(McKinseylike)

LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)

16

Note:ThiscaseistypicalofaMcKinseystructuredcaseinterview(thoughitisnotarealMcKinseycase).Theinterviewershoulddrivethediscussionthroughthefivesectionsbelow.Boldtextindicatesinstructionsfortheinterviewer.Theinterviewershouldthoroughlyreviewthisdocumentbeforegivingthecase.

CaseSetup

OneofthemanyfunctionsoftheNewYorkStateHealthCommissionistocoordinateorgandonationamongstthestate’smanyhospitals.Inrecentyearsthedemandfororganshasbeengreaterthanthesupply.Asaresult,manypatientsdieeachyearbecausetherearenotenoughorgandonations.TheHealthCommissionhashiredMcKinseytohelpitdeterminehowtoincreasethenumberofannualorgandonationsinNewYork.

Forthepurposesofthiscase,assumethatonlyNewYorkresidentsareinvolvedasdonorsandrecipients.

Question1

WhatarethefactorsanddriversthatdeterminethenumberoforgansdonatedinNewYorkeachyear?

Note:Thecandidateshouldaskclarifyingquestionsatthispointandshouldfeelfreetotakeaminutetoconstructaresponse.Thefollowinginformationshouldbegiveneitherwhenaskedfororwhenthecandidategetsstuck.

Information:InNewYork,organswillbeharvestedfromterminallyillorinjuredpatientsjustbeforedeathonlyiftheyarearegisteredorgandonororifthehospitalreceivespermissionfromthenextofkin.NewYorkresidentsmaychoosetoregisterasorgandonorswhentheyapplyforadriver’slicense.

Sampleanswer:

(Terminalpatients*%Registereddonors*organs/donor)+(Terminalpatients*%Notregistered*%Familyconsent*organs/donor)=organsdonated

“Thenumberoforgansdonatedisdeterminedbythenumberofterminalpatientstimesthepercentwhoareregistereddonorstimesthenumberoforgansperperson,plusthenumberofterminalpatientstimesthepercentthatarenotregistereddonorstimestherateoffamilyconsenttimesthenumberoforgansperperson.

“Thenumberofterminalpatientsisdrivenbytheageofthepopulation,changesinlifespans,medicaltechnology,thesizeofthepopulation,theoverallrateofnaturaldeath,plustherateofaccidentaldeath,suchascaraccidents.Thepercentageofregistereddonorsisdrivenbyawarenessofthedonorprogram,theeaseofregistering,whetheritisopt-inoropt-out,awarenessofthebenefitsoforgandonationandpersonalthingssuchasreligiousbeliefs.Therateoffamilyconsentisalsodrivenbyawarenessofthebenefitsoforgandonationandthingssuchasreligiousbeliefs,alongwiththeinformationprovided

17

bydoctorsinatimeofgreatgriefandassurancethatorganswillonlybeharvestedafterdeathiscertain.Thenumberoforgansdonatedperpersonisdrivenbytheaveragenumberofhealthy,usableorgansinadonor.

Whilewe’veidentifiedanumberoffactors,it’simportanttonotethatwecanonlyreallyinfluencetherateofregistereddonorsandtherateoffamilyconsent.”

Note:Thisquestionseekstotestacandidate’sbreadthofthinking.Agoodanswerwillbelogicalandstructured.Itwillexaminethefactorsasanequation,thoughnotnecessarilyexactlyaspresentedhere.Itwillbethoroughandshouldinclude3-4driversforeachfactor.Agreatanswerexaminestheimplicationsoftheanalysis–ie.Thereareonlytwofactorsthatwecaninfluence.

Question2

Theteamhasdecidedtofocusonincreasingthenumberofregistereddonorsandisspecificallyinterestedinkidneysdonations.TheHealthCommissionknowsthatitneeds9,200kidneysperyear.WhatpercentofNewYorkersneedtoberegistereddonorsinorderfor9,200kidneystobedonatedinayear?

Theteamhasalreadycollectedsomeusefulinformation:

ThepopulationofNewYorkis10million.Thepercentageofpeoplethatbecometerminallyillorinjuredeachyearis.1%(one-tenthofonepercent).Thepercentageoffamiliesthatgiveconsenttoharvestorgansis10%.

Sampleanswer:Thecandidateshouldsetupandsolvethefollowingequation.

RD=PercentofNewYorkerswhoareregistereddonors.

(10,000,000*.001*RD)+(10,000,000*.001*.1*(1-RD))=4,600(10,000*RD)+(1,000*(1-RD))=4,600

10,000RD+1,000-1,000RD=4,600

9,000RD=3,600RD=3,600/9,000RD=.4=40%

Note:Settheequationequalto4,600becausetherearetwokidneysperperson.4,600*2=9,200.

Note:Thereareotherpossiblewaystosetuptheequation.What’simportantisthatthecandidatetakesastructured,analyticalapproachtotheproblemanddoesn’tpanic.Thecandidateshouldwalktheinterviewerthroughthemath,eitherasshesolvestheequationorafterwards.Ifthecandidategetsstuck,giveappropriatehints.

18

Agreatanswerwillincludeimplicationsofthedata.Forexample,theymayconcludethat40%seemsreasonablebasedontheirpersonalexperiencesknowingpeoplewhoareregistereddonors.Anythingtoshowinitiativeandcriticalthinkingwithoutpromptingisgood.

Question3

WhatareallofthethingsthattheHealthCommissionshouldconsiderdoingtoincreasethenumberofregistereddonors?

Sampleanswer:“First,weshouldconductbenchmarkingstudies.Internalbenchmarkingwillrevealwhattheyarecurrentlydoingwelltodriveregistrations,andexternalbenchmarkingofotherstatesorcountrieswilluncovernewwaystoincreaseregistrations.Second,weshouldconductasegmentationofcurrentandprospectiveregistrants.We’llwanttodeterminethesegmentswherewearestrongsowecancontinuetocultivatethem,andatthesametimefindnewsegmentswherefewpeopleareregistering.Third,weshouldconductaseriesofmarketingcommunicationteststodetermineappropriatemessagingandchannelstoincreaseawarenessanddriveregistrations.WeshouldconsidertestingmediasuchasTV,radio,online,directmail,andmayalsobeabletoleveragethewordofmouthofourcurrentcustomers.We’llalsowanttodevelopmessagingthatincreasestheawarenessofthedonorprogram,thebenefitsofdonationandthesafeguardsthatareinplace.Finally,weneedtooptimizeourdistributionchannels.Currently,peoplecanonlyregisterwhentheygettheirdriver’slicense.Weshouldaddwaystoregister,suchasanytimesomeonegoestothedoctororhospital.Weshouldalsomakeiteasiertoregister.Forexample,ifNewYorkcurrentlyrequirespeopletoexplicitlyopt-in,wecanchangetoanautomaticopt-inwithanexplicitopt-out.

Note:Thisquestionisdesignedtoevaluatethecandidate’sdepthofthinking.Theaboveplanisasampleonlyandthereareotherapproaches.AgoodplanwillbeMECE,withdiscretecategories(ie.“Benchmarking”)andmultipleitemswithineachcategory.Theplanshoulddemonstratecommonsenseandsoundbusinessjudgment.

Question4

TheteamconductedacustomersegmentationandyourEngagementManagerhasaskedyoutodrawsomeinitialconclusionsfromthedata(givecandidatethedatahandoutfromtheendofthecase–candidateshouldclarifythatthedataareinmillionsofpeople).

Whatwouldyoutellher?Followupquestion:WhichsegmentrepresentsthebestopportunitytoincreaseRDs?

Sampleanswer:“ItlooksliketheCaucasiansegmenthasthelargestnumberofpotentialnewregistrants,butatthesametimeisalreadyhighlypenetrated.TheAfrican-Americansegmentistheopposite:low-penetrationbutlowupside.TheHispanicsegmenthasaslightlyhigherpenetrationthanAfrican-American,butisabiggerpopulation.Basedon

19

thisdataalone,IwouldtargettheHispanicsegmentbecauseofthelowcurrentpenetrationandlargepopulation.Someoftherisksincludeovercomingthelanguagebarrieranddealingwithculturaldifferences.”

Note:ThedatatableisdesignedtopresenttheCaucasian,African-AmericanandHispanicsegmentsasstrongpossibletargetsfordifferentreasons.Thecandidateshouldreasonthroughthepros/consoftargetingeachsegmentandcometoafirmhypothesisbasedonthisdata.It’smoreimportantthatthecandidateselectsatargetforgoodreasonsandlessimportantthatsheselectsHispanic.

Question5

TheteamhasdecidedtofocusonincreasingtheregistrationrateamongHispanics.WhataresomethingswecandotoincreaseregistrationsofHispanics??

Note:Thisquestionisdesignedtotestacandidate’screativity.Hence,asampleanswerisnotprovided.Itislikelythatthecandidatewillsuggestthingssuchascommunityoutreach,Spanishlanguagemarketingmaterials/registration,etc.,classicconsumermarketingtactics,havingvansdrivearoundHispaniccommunitiesencouragingpeopletoregister,etc.Agoodanswerwillhavealonglistofideasthatincludetypicalbusinesstacticsalongwithcreative,interestingsuggestions.Theinterviewshouldpushthecandidatebyrepeatedlyasking“Whatelse?”,untilthecandidatecannolongerthinkofthings,andtodeterminehowtheyrespondtopressure.

Question6

TheheadoftheHealthCommissionjustwalkedinandwantsarecommendationforwhatheshoulddotoquicklyreachHispanics.What’syourrecommendation?Starttalkingnow.

Sampleanswer:“Clearly,thereisabigopportunitywithHispanics.We’veidentifiedanumberofthingswecandotoincreaseregistrations,andsincewe’refocusedontheshortterm,IrecommendthatwedoX,Y,andZ,becauseofAandB.”

Note:Agoodanswershouldbeshort(20seconds),organizedandforceful.Thecandidateshouldbefirmandnothedgeheranswer.TherecommendedstepswilllikelybethingsdiscussedinQuestion4,andagoodanswerwillchoosetacticsthat,logically,willmakethebiggestimpact.

20

Handout

21

RegisteredDonors(M)

Population(M)

Caucasian

2.600

5.500

African-American

0.075

1.500

Hispanic

0.250

2.500

Other

0.100

0.500

CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW

CentralPower

LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)

22

Question

Ourclientisaregionalelectricitymonopoly.Duetoregulation,itsmarketwillbeopenedtocompetitionnextyearonJanuary1.Therearenoactualcompetitorsatthistime;however,theclientwouldlikeideasonactionstotakeintheshort-terminordertobetterprepareforpotentialcompetitors.Theyhavenocontroloverpricingandcost-cuttingduringthistimeperiod.

Note

ThiscaseissimilartoacasethatastudentmayreceiveinasecondroundinterviewwithMcKinsey,BCG,orATK.Thereisn‟tmuchdata-it‟sanexerciseinimaginationtemperedbyconvergentthinking.ItwouldbesimilartoafirstroundMonitorGroupcaseifithadasurplusofdata,ratherthanadeficit,requiringdiscriminationratherthanimagination.

ClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers

Providethefollowinganswersonlyiftheintervieweeasksthecorrespondingquestion.

Question

Doweknowofanypotentialcompetitors?

Doyouhaveanyinformationonpricing?

Answer

Noneatthistime.CentralPowerisfacingthethreatofmarketentry.

Notreally;pricingiscontrolledbyagovernment,soitisbeyondourcontrolandwillbethesameforanycompetition.

Noneatthistime.Ourengagementisfocusedontheirhomemarket.

CentralPowerhasthreedivisions:

SalesandGeneralAdministration

GenerationandTransmission

MaintenanceandRepairAboutoneforevery1000customers.No,theytreateveryoneequally.

ArethereothermarketsCentralPowercanenter?

HowisCentralPowerorganized?

Howmanyemployeesareinsales?

Doessales,customerservicetreatcertaincustomersegmentsdifferently?

Ifthereisapoweroutage,doesMaintenanceandRepairfixindustrialclientsfirst?

HasCentralPowereveradvertisedorhadamarketingcampaign?

IsCentralPowerundertakinganycapitalinvestment?

No,theydispatchintheorderofthecalltheyreceive.

Notinrecentmemory.

Notinthenextyear.

23

Plan

Thiscaseisaboutcustomerretentionwithinthehomemarket.Sincetheclientisamonopoly,marketshareis100%andcustomeracquisitionisirrelevant.

Theanalysismayinclude,butisnotlimitedto,thefollowingareas:

10.BarrierstoEntry

a.

b.

c.

Thereisnoactualcompetitiontospecificallytarget

Thegovernmentisderegulating,sotherearenopossibleexternalbarriers

Internalbarriersarepossible,suchasincreasingswitchingcostsandcommercialattractivenesstocustomers

AnticipationofCompetitiveAttack-Oncethecandidateseestheexhibitandrealizeshowattractivetheindustrialclientsare,theycananticipatehowarationalcompetitorwouldenterthemarket.

MarketInformation

Revenue

CustomerSegmentation

StakeholderReaction-Howwillemployees,unions,orlocalgovernmentleadersreacttoourchanges?(Thereisnosetanswertothis,justaskthecandidatewhattheythinkandseeifitislogicalandstructured.)

Strongplanswillanticipatetheneedtobecompetitiveanddrawonanalogouscompaniesorsituations.

Lessexperiencedcandidatesgravitatetowardsissuesofpricingandcost-cutting.Thisisnotaprofitabilitycase.Weakcandidateswilloftenexploregrowthoutsidethehomemarket,suchasexpansionintoadjacentmarkets.Whileinteresting,thisdoesnotaddresstheprimaryproblemofwhattodointhehomemarketbeforederegulation.Avoidthesetangents.

Steerthecandidatetocustomerretention.

Thecasehastwomainphases.

Phase1:QualitativereactionandquantitativeanalysisofrevenuedataPurpose:

1.Testrapidunderstandingofabasicchart

Mostcandidatesaskaboutrevenueveryearly.Showthemtheattachedexhibitandimmediatelyask,“Whatisyourreactiontothisdata?”Strongresponsesnoticethedifferencesbetweenthecustomersegments.

The“historicaldata”isirrelevant.Ifacandidatestartstoaskaboutitordiscusstrends,informthemthatisafactororpopulationandgovernment-determinedprices,whicharebothbeyondthecontrolofthecompany.

24

2.Testbasicarithmetic

Testbasicmathbyaskingthecandidate(iftheyhaven‟talreadydoneso)tocalculatetheshareoftotalrevenuepersegm

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论