版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
DardenConsultingCasebook
2008-2009
Acknowledgements
Thefollowingindividualscontributedcasestothecasebookandwithouttheirtimeandeffortthiscasebookwouldnotbepossible.
GordonAvery–Classof2009
ArupBhattacharjee-Classof2009
MatthewConnor-Classof2009
MatthewHeim–Classof2009
Arnon(Arnie)Katz–Classof2009
JamesMitchell–Classof2008
MichaelMurphy–Classof2009
ShankarRaja–Classof2009
AnandRao–Classof2009
Yuan(York)Zhong-
Classof2008
2
CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW
BikeDVDRentalServiceinNYC
LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)
3
Question
Youfriendhasapproachedyouwithabusinessideaandwantsyouradvice.HewantstoopenaDVDRentalserviceinNewYorkCity,specificallyManhattan.DVDswouldbedeliveredtocustomersviadeliverypeopleonbicycles.Whatwouldyoutellyourfriend?
Note
Thiscasecombineselementsofwhatastudentmightseeinboth1stand2ndroundinterview.
ClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers
Providethefollowinganswersonlyiftheintervieweeasksthecorrespondingquestion.
Question
1.Whatkindofcompetitionexists?
Answer
AssumethatNetflixandcomparableservicesarenotavailable.Pushthestudenttocomeupwithlargechains(Blockbuster),localvideorentalstores,movietheaters,livetheater,etc.
Hewantstobreakevenwithin1year.
2.Whatisyourfriend’sacceptablebreakevenperiod?
5.WherewilltheDVDsbestored?
Theywillbestoredinyourfriend’sapartment(hehasplentyofspaceforthecollection).
Plan
ThisisaprimarilyaMarketSizingandProfitabilitycase,butalsoincludesotherelements..Theanalysismayinclude,butisnotlimitedto,thefollowingareas:
1.MarketSizingAnalysis(Detailsshowsinexcelsheetatend)
a.
EstimatethepopulationofManhattan–Pushthestudenttopickanumberaround2millionpeople.
EstimatetheaveragehouseholdsizeinManhattan–Pushthestudenttopick2(lowerthanthe3personaverageforthecountryduetoahighernumberofsingles)
EstimatetheportionofthehouseholdsthatyourfriendwillbeabletoservebasedonhavingonecentrallocationfortheDVDs–Pushthestudenttopick25%ofthepopulation.
Estimatethepercentageofthemarketthatyourfriend‟sservicewillcaptureinthefirstyear.–Pushthestudenttopickanumberaround1%.
b.
c.
d.
4
e. Estimatetherentalspermonth.Therecanbesomeflexibilityhere,butpushthestudenttomakeassumptionsthatyieldaround2,000movierentals/monthforyourfriend‟sbusiness
ProfitabilityandBreakeven
a. Givethefollowinginformationwhenasked
2.
i.
AssumeyourknowsomeonewhohasasizeableDVDcollectionthattheyarewillingtoselltoyouto$10,000.
Assumeyouhaveafriendwhocansetupawebsiteandmaintainitforyouforaone-timefeeof$10,000
VariablecosttodeliverDVDis$4(paybicycledeliveryperson).Assumeaninfinitesupplyofbicycledeliverypeople.
Chosepricesbetween$5and$8andcalculatethebreakeventimeinmonths(seeexcelsheetatend)
ii.
iii.
iv.
3.
Operationsanalysis
a.
b.
c.
Whattimeandwhatdayswouldyouoperateyourservice?
HowwouldDVDsbereturned(likelydroppedoffatcentrallocation)Howwilltheservicefunctioninthewintermonthsorwhenitrains?
4.
MarketingandAdvertisingAnalysis
a.
b.
c.
Whatisthecompetitiveadvantageofthisbusiness?Howwouldyouattractcustomers?
Howcanyouadvertiseeffectivelyandinexpensively?
5
Calculations
MarketAnalysis
Assumptions:
DVDs/Monthforyourfriend
2000
6
MarketBreakdown
Size
DVDs/Month
LowRenters
500
1
MediumRenters
250
2
HighRenters
250
4
PeopleinManhattan
2,000,000
People/Household
2
HouseholdsinManhattan
1,000,000
%ofpopulationthatcanbeserved
25%
%ofpopulationthatrentsregularly
40%
%ofmarketthatwecancapture
1%
MarketPotential(Households)
1,000
ProfitabilityAnalysis
Recommendation
Therecommendationshouldincludethefollowing:
1.
Theanswer–Basedonthemarketandprofitabilityanalysisalongwithmyfriendstargetofbreakingeveninlessthanayear,Iwouldrecommendthathegoesforwardwiththebusiness.
Thenumber(s)–Atapriceof$5,thefriendcanbreakeveninapproximately10months
Risksorconsiderations–Demandmightnotmaterialize,delivering60+videosviabicyclemightnotbepractical,andcompetitionsuchasinternetmoviescouldmaketheserviceobsolete.
Nextsteps–Purchasethevideocollection,setupthewebsite,andstartadvertising.
2.
3.
4.
QuestionstoFurtherChallengetheInterviewee
1.Whatchallengeswouldbefacedifyourfriendwantedtoexpandtheservicetoservemorecustomers?
7
Price/DVD
Breakeventime(months)
$5.00
10.0
$6.00
5.0
$7.00
3.3
$8.00
2.5
DVDCapitalCosts
10,000
WebsiteCosts
10,000
VariableDeliveryCosts
$4
CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW
DryWallCompetitiveThreat
LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)
8
9
Question
Ourclientisadrywallmanufacturerandisconcernedaboutanewplayercomingintothemarket.Thenewplayerisperceivedtobealowpriceplayerandourclientisconsideringloweringitspriceby10%.Theclientseeksouradviceregardingitsoptions.
Note
ThiscaseissimilartoacasethatastudentmayreceiveinafirstorsecondroundinterviewwithBCG/Bain.
ClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers
Providethefollowinganswersonlyiftheintervieweeasksthecorrespondingquestion.
Question
Howmanyproductsdoestheclientproduce?
Isthenewcompetitor’sproductsimilartoours?
Answer
One
Forpracticalpurposeswecanassumethatourproductissimilartothenewcompetitor’sproduct.
Forouranalysisassumeallthe“dry-wall”productsinthemarketaresimilar.
3.Howare“dry-wall”productsdifferentiated?
Plan
Thisisastrategy/competitivetypecase.Acomprehensiveplanshouldincludethefollowingareas:
5.
6.
7.
Client‟simpactofreducingpriceby10%
MarketStructure(Intermsofnumberofcompetitorsandtheirshare)Customer–
a.
b.
c.
Whoareourcustomers?TheirPreferences
PriceSensitivity
8.
NewCompetitor
a.
b.
c.
SizeStrength
Weaknesses
10
9.OurClient‟sposition
a.
b.
c.
MarketPosition
HowlongweareinthemarketBrandStrength
Question:Afterthecandidatelaysouthisorherplan,askthecandidatetoanalyzetheimpactof10%pricereductiononourclient‟sbottomline.
Whenthecandidateasksprovidethefollowinginformationregardingrevenueandcostsforourclient:
Numberofunitssold=100,000SellingPricePerUnit=$10VariableCostPerUnit=$3
AllocatedFixedCostPerUnit=$2
KeyAssumption:
Ifthecandidateasksregardingthevolumechangewiththepricecut,statethatthevolumewillremainsamewiththepricecut.Ifthecandidatedoesnotaskaboutthevolumechangeitisexpectedthatthecandidateexplicitlystatetheassumptionbeforeproceedingtothecalculation.
ExpectedCalculation:
TotalFixedCost=$100,000*$2=$200,000
Thisisakeyinsight,theallocatedfixedcostneedstobeconvertedintototalfixedcost.
OriginalCase
Revenue=$10*100,000=$1,000,000VariableCost=$3*100,000=$300,000
ContributionMargin=$1,000,000-$300,000=$700,000Profit=$700,000-$200,000=$500,000
PriceCutScenarioNewPrice=$9
Revenue=$9*100,000=$900,000VariableCost=$3*100,000=$300,000
ContributionMargin=$900,000-$300,000=$600,000
11
NewProfit=$600,000-$200,000=$400,000
Impactonbottomline=[(NewProfit–OldProfit)/(OldProfit)]
Impactonbottomline=($400,000-$500,000)/$500,000=-$100,000/$500,000=-20%
Thecandidateisexpectedtostatethattheimpactonthebottomlineis20%andthusismagnifiedcomparedtothe10%pricecut.
Question:Nowaskthecandidateifourclientmaintainsthepricehowmuchvolumeitpotentiallyneedstolosetomakeitequivalenttocuttingthepriceby10%.
Ifthecandidatetakestheinitiativeandexploresthisquestionthenitneedstobenotedandencouraged(thisdifferentiatesaverystrongcandidatefromothers)
ExpectedAnalysis:
Letthenewvolumeofunitstheclientsellsbe“x”.
Soiftheclientsells“x”units@$10,theprofitwouldbe:
Revenue=10*xVariableCost=3*xFixedCost=$200,000
Profit=10x-3x-$200,000
Aclassicmistakeistotakethecontributionperunitas$5(effectivelytreatingtheallocatedfixedcostasavariablecosttoo)andusing$5*xastheprofit.
Soforthisoptiontobeequivalenttocuttingthepriceby10%theequationwouldbe10x–3x–200,000=400,000
7x=600,000
x=600,000/7=85,700approx
Lossinmarketshare=(85,700-100,000)/100,000=14.3%
Itisexpectedthatthecandidateexplainswhatthis14.3%numberrepresents;expectedanswerwouldbethatthe14.3%isthemaximummarketshareourclientcanaffordtolosebeforetheoptionofcuttingpriceby10%appearstobeabetterchoice.
Acandidatecandifferentiatehimselforherselfbystatingthatkeyistoestimatehowmuchtheclientcanpotentiallyloseifitdoesnotreducepriceby10%.
Question:Nowaskthecandidatethatifourclientneedstomakeachoicebetweenthesetwooptionshowyouwouldhelpourclientmakethechoice.
Nowthecandidateisexpectedtomakeuseofhisorherplantohelpmakeadecision.Ifcandidateasksthefollowingquestionsprovidethefollowinginformation:
12
WhatistheMarketStructure?(Intermsofnumberofcompetitorsandtheirshare)
Answer:ShowExhbit1,withtheshares
WhatissizeoftheCompetitor?
Answer:Theyareasmalltomidsizeplayer
Whoareourcustomers?
Answer:Theyareprimarilycontractors/smallbusinessowners.Theybuydirectlyfromus.
WhatareourCustomer‟sPreferencesorhowpricesensitivetheyare?
Customersusuallybuybasedonrelationshipsandtheybuildpreferenceonaparticularbrand.Wedonothaveanyinformationregardingpricesensitivity.
Howdoweselltoourcustomers?
Wesellbasedontheirorders.Therearenolongtermcontracts.
Whatarethestrengthsofthenewcompetitor?
Answer:Notmuchinformation,theyareanewplayerinthemarket.Theyhavepresenceinothermarketourclientdoesnotcompetein.
Whataretheweaknessesofthenewcompetitor?
Answer:Notmuchinformation,theyareanewplayerinthemarket.Theyhavepresenceinothermarketourclientdoesnotcompetein.
Whatisourbrandstrength?
Answer:Asanumber3player,wehavestrongbrandpresenceandwehavebeeninthemarketforasignificantperiodoftime.
Howlongwehavebeeninthemarket?
Wehavebeeninthemarketforasignificantperiodoftime.
Istheremuchdifferentiationintheproduct?
Notmuch,forpracticalpurposesconsiderallproductstobesimilar.
13
KeyExpectedInsights
Basedontheinformationprovidedthecandidateisexpectedtocomeupwithatleastthefollowinginsights:
Drywallmarketisaveryfragmented,andweareadominantplayer
Consideringthesizeofthecompetitor,theywouldbeoneofthesmall30+1playersThatwouldmeanonanaveragethenewcompetitor‟smarketsharewouldbearound
o70/31=2.3%approx
NewCompetitorassumingfairsharedrawwouldtake2.3%ofourvolume,althoughonecanarguethattheymaynottakeanyvolumeandcompetewiththeothersmall/midsize30players
Question:Nowaskthecandidatetomaketherecommendation.
Recommendation
Therecommendationshouldincludethefollowing:
5.
Theanswer–Clientshouldnotreduceprice,becausethisisnotaseriousthreatandcuttingpriceinthismarketwouldleadtoapricewarwhereeveryonewouldlose.
Thenumber(s)–Reducingthepriceby10%wouldimpactprofitby20%.20%impactonprofitisequivalenttolosing14.3%marketshareatthecurrentpricelevelsandatmosttheclientcanlose2.5%volume.
6.
7.
Risksorconsiderations–
Wemightunderestimatethesizeorstrengthofthenewcompetitor(newcompetitormightbeboughtbyabiggerplayer)
Oneofthemajorcompetitors(AorB)mayhaveakneejerkreactionandreduceprice
Nextsteps–
Tomitigatesomeoftherisksourclientshouldaggressivelystrengthenitsclientbaseby
Providingadditionalservices
Tocreateabarrierforthenewcompetitortopoachourclient‟scustomers
Clientcanenterintolongtermcontractswithitscustomers
8.
14
c. EvenifAorBreducesitsprice,ourclientshouldmaintainpriceandaggressivelyprovidevalueaddedservicestothecustomers.
Exhibits
(CaseExhibitsshouldbeonaseparatesheetofpaperandincludedorattachedtotheendofthisdocument.Iftherearenoexhibits,includeanydatathattheinterviewermustprovide.)
120%
100%
12%
10%
8%
80%
A
60%
B
40%
Client
30otherplayers
70%
20%
0%
1
DryWallMarket
Exhibit1
15
CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW
OrganDonationCase(McKinseylike)
LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)
16
Note:ThiscaseistypicalofaMcKinseystructuredcaseinterview(thoughitisnotarealMcKinseycase).Theinterviewershoulddrivethediscussionthroughthefivesectionsbelow.Boldtextindicatesinstructionsfortheinterviewer.Theinterviewershouldthoroughlyreviewthisdocumentbeforegivingthecase.
CaseSetup
OneofthemanyfunctionsoftheNewYorkStateHealthCommissionistocoordinateorgandonationamongstthestate’smanyhospitals.Inrecentyearsthedemandfororganshasbeengreaterthanthesupply.Asaresult,manypatientsdieeachyearbecausetherearenotenoughorgandonations.TheHealthCommissionhashiredMcKinseytohelpitdeterminehowtoincreasethenumberofannualorgandonationsinNewYork.
Forthepurposesofthiscase,assumethatonlyNewYorkresidentsareinvolvedasdonorsandrecipients.
Question1
WhatarethefactorsanddriversthatdeterminethenumberoforgansdonatedinNewYorkeachyear?
Note:Thecandidateshouldaskclarifyingquestionsatthispointandshouldfeelfreetotakeaminutetoconstructaresponse.Thefollowinginformationshouldbegiveneitherwhenaskedfororwhenthecandidategetsstuck.
Information:InNewYork,organswillbeharvestedfromterminallyillorinjuredpatientsjustbeforedeathonlyiftheyarearegisteredorgandonororifthehospitalreceivespermissionfromthenextofkin.NewYorkresidentsmaychoosetoregisterasorgandonorswhentheyapplyforadriver’slicense.
Sampleanswer:
(Terminalpatients*%Registereddonors*organs/donor)+(Terminalpatients*%Notregistered*%Familyconsent*organs/donor)=organsdonated
“Thenumberoforgansdonatedisdeterminedbythenumberofterminalpatientstimesthepercentwhoareregistereddonorstimesthenumberoforgansperperson,plusthenumberofterminalpatientstimesthepercentthatarenotregistereddonorstimestherateoffamilyconsenttimesthenumberoforgansperperson.
“Thenumberofterminalpatientsisdrivenbytheageofthepopulation,changesinlifespans,medicaltechnology,thesizeofthepopulation,theoverallrateofnaturaldeath,plustherateofaccidentaldeath,suchascaraccidents.Thepercentageofregistereddonorsisdrivenbyawarenessofthedonorprogram,theeaseofregistering,whetheritisopt-inoropt-out,awarenessofthebenefitsoforgandonationandpersonalthingssuchasreligiousbeliefs.Therateoffamilyconsentisalsodrivenbyawarenessofthebenefitsoforgandonationandthingssuchasreligiousbeliefs,alongwiththeinformationprovided
17
bydoctorsinatimeofgreatgriefandassurancethatorganswillonlybeharvestedafterdeathiscertain.Thenumberoforgansdonatedperpersonisdrivenbytheaveragenumberofhealthy,usableorgansinadonor.
Whilewe’veidentifiedanumberoffactors,it’simportanttonotethatwecanonlyreallyinfluencetherateofregistereddonorsandtherateoffamilyconsent.”
Note:Thisquestionseekstotestacandidate’sbreadthofthinking.Agoodanswerwillbelogicalandstructured.Itwillexaminethefactorsasanequation,thoughnotnecessarilyexactlyaspresentedhere.Itwillbethoroughandshouldinclude3-4driversforeachfactor.Agreatanswerexaminestheimplicationsoftheanalysis–ie.Thereareonlytwofactorsthatwecaninfluence.
Question2
Theteamhasdecidedtofocusonincreasingthenumberofregistereddonorsandisspecificallyinterestedinkidneysdonations.TheHealthCommissionknowsthatitneeds9,200kidneysperyear.WhatpercentofNewYorkersneedtoberegistereddonorsinorderfor9,200kidneystobedonatedinayear?
Theteamhasalreadycollectedsomeusefulinformation:
ThepopulationofNewYorkis10million.Thepercentageofpeoplethatbecometerminallyillorinjuredeachyearis.1%(one-tenthofonepercent).Thepercentageoffamiliesthatgiveconsenttoharvestorgansis10%.
Sampleanswer:Thecandidateshouldsetupandsolvethefollowingequation.
RD=PercentofNewYorkerswhoareregistereddonors.
(10,000,000*.001*RD)+(10,000,000*.001*.1*(1-RD))=4,600(10,000*RD)+(1,000*(1-RD))=4,600
10,000RD+1,000-1,000RD=4,600
9,000RD=3,600RD=3,600/9,000RD=.4=40%
Note:Settheequationequalto4,600becausetherearetwokidneysperperson.4,600*2=9,200.
Note:Thereareotherpossiblewaystosetuptheequation.What’simportantisthatthecandidatetakesastructured,analyticalapproachtotheproblemanddoesn’tpanic.Thecandidateshouldwalktheinterviewerthroughthemath,eitherasshesolvestheequationorafterwards.Ifthecandidategetsstuck,giveappropriatehints.
18
Agreatanswerwillincludeimplicationsofthedata.Forexample,theymayconcludethat40%seemsreasonablebasedontheirpersonalexperiencesknowingpeoplewhoareregistereddonors.Anythingtoshowinitiativeandcriticalthinkingwithoutpromptingisgood.
Question3
WhatareallofthethingsthattheHealthCommissionshouldconsiderdoingtoincreasethenumberofregistereddonors?
Sampleanswer:“First,weshouldconductbenchmarkingstudies.Internalbenchmarkingwillrevealwhattheyarecurrentlydoingwelltodriveregistrations,andexternalbenchmarkingofotherstatesorcountrieswilluncovernewwaystoincreaseregistrations.Second,weshouldconductasegmentationofcurrentandprospectiveregistrants.We’llwanttodeterminethesegmentswherewearestrongsowecancontinuetocultivatethem,andatthesametimefindnewsegmentswherefewpeopleareregistering.Third,weshouldconductaseriesofmarketingcommunicationteststodetermineappropriatemessagingandchannelstoincreaseawarenessanddriveregistrations.WeshouldconsidertestingmediasuchasTV,radio,online,directmail,andmayalsobeabletoleveragethewordofmouthofourcurrentcustomers.We’llalsowanttodevelopmessagingthatincreasestheawarenessofthedonorprogram,thebenefitsofdonationandthesafeguardsthatareinplace.Finally,weneedtooptimizeourdistributionchannels.Currently,peoplecanonlyregisterwhentheygettheirdriver’slicense.Weshouldaddwaystoregister,suchasanytimesomeonegoestothedoctororhospital.Weshouldalsomakeiteasiertoregister.Forexample,ifNewYorkcurrentlyrequirespeopletoexplicitlyopt-in,wecanchangetoanautomaticopt-inwithanexplicitopt-out.
Note:Thisquestionisdesignedtoevaluatethecandidate’sdepthofthinking.Theaboveplanisasampleonlyandthereareotherapproaches.AgoodplanwillbeMECE,withdiscretecategories(ie.“Benchmarking”)andmultipleitemswithineachcategory.Theplanshoulddemonstratecommonsenseandsoundbusinessjudgment.
Question4
TheteamconductedacustomersegmentationandyourEngagementManagerhasaskedyoutodrawsomeinitialconclusionsfromthedata(givecandidatethedatahandoutfromtheendofthecase–candidateshouldclarifythatthedataareinmillionsofpeople).
Whatwouldyoutellher?Followupquestion:WhichsegmentrepresentsthebestopportunitytoincreaseRDs?
Sampleanswer:“ItlooksliketheCaucasiansegmenthasthelargestnumberofpotentialnewregistrants,butatthesametimeisalreadyhighlypenetrated.TheAfrican-Americansegmentistheopposite:low-penetrationbutlowupside.TheHispanicsegmenthasaslightlyhigherpenetrationthanAfrican-American,butisabiggerpopulation.Basedon
19
thisdataalone,IwouldtargettheHispanicsegmentbecauseofthelowcurrentpenetrationandlargepopulation.Someoftherisksincludeovercomingthelanguagebarrieranddealingwithculturaldifferences.”
Note:ThedatatableisdesignedtopresenttheCaucasian,African-AmericanandHispanicsegmentsasstrongpossibletargetsfordifferentreasons.Thecandidateshouldreasonthroughthepros/consoftargetingeachsegmentandcometoafirmhypothesisbasedonthisdata.It’smoreimportantthatthecandidateselectsatargetforgoodreasonsandlessimportantthatsheselectsHispanic.
Question5
TheteamhasdecidedtofocusonincreasingtheregistrationrateamongHispanics.WhataresomethingswecandotoincreaseregistrationsofHispanics??
Note:Thisquestionisdesignedtotestacandidate’screativity.Hence,asampleanswerisnotprovided.Itislikelythatthecandidatewillsuggestthingssuchascommunityoutreach,Spanishlanguagemarketingmaterials/registration,etc.,classicconsumermarketingtactics,havingvansdrivearoundHispaniccommunitiesencouragingpeopletoregister,etc.Agoodanswerwillhavealonglistofideasthatincludetypicalbusinesstacticsalongwithcreative,interestingsuggestions.Theinterviewshouldpushthecandidatebyrepeatedlyasking“Whatelse?”,untilthecandidatecannolongerthinkofthings,andtodeterminehowtheyrespondtopressure.
Question6
TheheadoftheHealthCommissionjustwalkedinandwantsarecommendationforwhatheshoulddotoquicklyreachHispanics.What’syourrecommendation?Starttalkingnow.
Sampleanswer:“Clearly,thereisabigopportunitywithHispanics.We’veidentifiedanumberofthingswecandotoincreaseregistrations,andsincewe’refocusedontheshortterm,IrecommendthatwedoX,Y,andZ,becauseofAandB.”
Note:Agoodanswershouldbeshort(20seconds),organizedandforceful.Thecandidateshouldbefirmandnothedgeheranswer.TherecommendedstepswilllikelybethingsdiscussedinQuestion4,andagoodanswerwillchoosetacticsthat,logically,willmakethebiggestimpact.
20
Handout
21
RegisteredDonors(M)
Population(M)
Caucasian
2.600
5.500
African-American
0.075
1.500
Hispanic
0.250
2.500
Other
0.100
0.500
CONSULTINGCASEINTERVIEW
CentralPower
LevelofDifficulty(Selectlevelofdifficulty)
22
Question
Ourclientisaregionalelectricitymonopoly.Duetoregulation,itsmarketwillbeopenedtocompetitionnextyearonJanuary1.Therearenoactualcompetitorsatthistime;however,theclientwouldlikeideasonactionstotakeintheshort-terminordertobetterprepareforpotentialcompetitors.Theyhavenocontroloverpricingandcost-cuttingduringthistimeperiod.
Note
ThiscaseissimilartoacasethatastudentmayreceiveinasecondroundinterviewwithMcKinsey,BCG,orATK.Thereisn‟tmuchdata-it‟sanexerciseinimaginationtemperedbyconvergentthinking.ItwouldbesimilartoafirstroundMonitorGroupcaseifithadasurplusofdata,ratherthanadeficit,requiringdiscriminationratherthanimagination.
ClarifyingQuestionsandAnswers
Providethefollowinganswersonlyiftheintervieweeasksthecorrespondingquestion.
Question
Doweknowofanypotentialcompetitors?
Doyouhaveanyinformationonpricing?
Answer
Noneatthistime.CentralPowerisfacingthethreatofmarketentry.
Notreally;pricingiscontrolledbyagovernment,soitisbeyondourcontrolandwillbethesameforanycompetition.
Noneatthistime.Ourengagementisfocusedontheirhomemarket.
CentralPowerhasthreedivisions:
SalesandGeneralAdministration
GenerationandTransmission
MaintenanceandRepairAboutoneforevery1000customers.No,theytreateveryoneequally.
ArethereothermarketsCentralPowercanenter?
HowisCentralPowerorganized?
Howmanyemployeesareinsales?
Doessales,customerservicetreatcertaincustomersegmentsdifferently?
Ifthereisapoweroutage,doesMaintenanceandRepairfixindustrialclientsfirst?
HasCentralPowereveradvertisedorhadamarketingcampaign?
IsCentralPowerundertakinganycapitalinvestment?
No,theydispatchintheorderofthecalltheyreceive.
Notinrecentmemory.
Notinthenextyear.
23
Plan
Thiscaseisaboutcustomerretentionwithinthehomemarket.Sincetheclientisamonopoly,marketshareis100%andcustomeracquisitionisirrelevant.
Theanalysismayinclude,butisnotlimitedto,thefollowingareas:
10.BarrierstoEntry
a.
b.
c.
Thereisnoactualcompetitiontospecificallytarget
Thegovernmentisderegulating,sotherearenopossibleexternalbarriers
Internalbarriersarepossible,suchasincreasingswitchingcostsandcommercialattractivenesstocustomers
AnticipationofCompetitiveAttack-Oncethecandidateseestheexhibitandrealizeshowattractivetheindustrialclientsare,theycananticipatehowarationalcompetitorwouldenterthemarket.
MarketInformation
Revenue
CustomerSegmentation
StakeholderReaction-Howwillemployees,unions,orlocalgovernmentleadersreacttoourchanges?(Thereisnosetanswertothis,justaskthecandidatewhattheythinkandseeifitislogicalandstructured.)
Strongplanswillanticipatetheneedtobecompetitiveanddrawonanalogouscompaniesorsituations.
Lessexperiencedcandidatesgravitatetowardsissuesofpricingandcost-cutting.Thisisnotaprofitabilitycase.Weakcandidateswilloftenexploregrowthoutsidethehomemarket,suchasexpansionintoadjacentmarkets.Whileinteresting,thisdoesnotaddresstheprimaryproblemofwhattodointhehomemarketbeforederegulation.Avoidthesetangents.
Steerthecandidatetocustomerretention.
Thecasehastwomainphases.
Phase1:QualitativereactionandquantitativeanalysisofrevenuedataPurpose:
1.Testrapidunderstandingofabasicchart
Mostcandidatesaskaboutrevenueveryearly.Showthemtheattachedexhibitandimmediatelyask,“Whatisyourreactiontothisdata?”Strongresponsesnoticethedifferencesbetweenthecustomersegments.
The“historicaldata”isirrelevant.Ifacandidatestartstoaskaboutitordiscusstrends,informthemthatisafactororpopulationandgovernment-determinedprices,whicharebothbeyondthecontrolofthecompany.
24
2.Testbasicarithmetic
Testbasicmathbyaskingthecandidate(iftheyhaven‟talreadydoneso)tocalculatetheshareoftotalrevenuepersegm
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 客房服务与管理(北川羌族自治县“七一”职业中学)知到智慧树答案
- 《小灵通资料》课件
- 生物医药企业加速器项目可行性研究报告
- 《景别和运动镜头》课件
- 《期中考试家长会》课件
- 《仓库基础知识培训》课件
- 说和做公开课课件
- 儿童餐饮服务厨师招聘简章
- 健康管理门头租赁合同
- 水上养殖船操作细则
- 幼儿园中班早期阅读《长颈鹿好长喔》图画书PPT课件【幼儿教案】
- 铜及铜合金物理冶金基础-相图、紫铜
- 美术领域思维能力教案
- 智慧酒店无人酒店综合服务解决方案
- 工程量清单及控制价编制工作方案三篇
- 中央企业合规管理办法培训考试题及答案
- 9脊柱与四肢、神经系统检查总结
- 钢桥:钢梁安装工程现场质量检验报告单
- 秀场内外-走进服装表演艺术智慧树知到答案章节测试2023年武汉纺织大学
- 法医鹰一样的眼睛智慧树知到答案章节测试2023年南方医科大学
- 电镀高温镍在卷对卷连续电镀中的应用性能综合评价
评论
0/150
提交评论