动物实验利与弊

动物实验利与弊论点1：（正方）不人道Firstofall,themaindisadvantageofanimaltestingistheinhumanetreatmentofanimalsintestsduetothefactthatanesthesiaforthehelpofpainisoftennotused.Scientistssaythatusinganesthesiawillinterferewithtestresults.Todaytheterm“vivisection”isused.Vivisectionisdefinedas“cuttingwhilestillalive”butitismorecommonlyusedtodayasanyharmfulexperimentortestthatisperformedonananimal.Animalexperimentationinvolvestheincarcerationofanimalsandpoisoning,mutilation,diseaseandkillingofthoseindividuals.Itisarguablythemostbrutalandmostsevereformofviolenceinthemodernworld.Itissaidthatanestimated50,000animalsdieduetothetestingonthem.SomeoftheteststhatIAMSperformedwere:28femalecatshadtheirabdomens（腹部）cutopenandsolutioninjectedrepeatedlyintotheirbowels.24youngdogsweregivenkidneyfailurebytheremovalofonekidneyandthedamagingoftheother.Allthedogswerekilledafterbeingfedanexperimentaldietandtheirkidneysanalyzed.论点2：（正方）可有别的措施Manyalternativesalreadyexist,andtheremustbemanymorewhicharewaitingtobefound.Thedaywillsurelycomewhennotmoreexperimentsonanimalswillneedtobedoneforhumanmedicine.it'sharedtosaytherewillalwaysbealternativesforveterinaryresearch,Themostcommonalternativesthatareusedtodayare:in-vitrotests,computersoftware,andevenhuman“clinicaltests”.Theuseofanimalcells,organs,andtissueculturesarealsodeemedasalternatives,（反驳正方）howeveranimallivesarestillsacrificedfortheuseoftheirparts.Wecanonlytalkaboutbanningexperimentationwhenthealternativeshavebeenprovedtobeaccurate,andsafe.

→（反方反驳）Asamedicalstudent,I'verealizedthatartificialmeanscanneverreplacetheincrediblecomplexityoflivinganimals.Itmaynotbepossibletobanallanimaltestsquiteyet,butthereshouldbealotmoremoney,timeandeffortsgoingintofindingalternatives.新论点3：正方：动物也有权利Couldanyonetellmewhyhumansaremoreimportantthananyotheranimals?Couldanyonepleasetellmethefundamentalreasonwhyhumansufferingis'absolutely'moreimportantthananimalsuffering,whytheintenseagonyexperiencedbyalaboratoryanimalisinconsequential（不重要的，微不足道的）whenviewagainstthesameorevenlesserdegreeofsufferingwithinbecausethenecessarytreatmenthadbeendevelopedusinglaboratoryanimals?

Ifyouanswered'Yes'toALLoftheabove,thenyouarefreefromhypocrisy（伪善，虚伪）inyourmoralstance(l立场姿态).

论点1：我们需要动物实验Animalstestingisreallynecessary.分论点（1）患者的需要Firstofall,allthepatientsareintheneedofthetesting.Why?Couldyourealizethattheanimalsyoubelievearebeingharmed,havenotonlyimpactedyourlivesinsomeway,buthaveimpactedyourfamilies,friends,byprovidingpeoplewithvaccinesandantibiotics.Whenitcomesdowntoit,rightlyorwrongly,wewillallhappilysacrificeananimalinordertosavealovedone!Millionsoflivesaresavedeveryyearbecauseofoneanimal’s,resultstoeitheradrugornewformofsurgery.TellmethatWhichwouldyouprefertolive-anillchildorahealthybunny?Withrightscomeresponsibilities-whatresponsibilitiestoanimalshave?Howmanypeoplewhoadvocatebanninganimaltestinghaveacceptedmedicineswhichhavealmostsurelybeentestedonanimals.Amovetowardsanimalrightsmeansamoveawayfromhumanrights.分论点（2）科学研究的需要Thesecond,animaltestingisthemostpredominantformoftestingusedbyscientists.Animalresearchplaysavital,andirreplaceable,roleinsuchfieldsasdrugandcancerresearch.Thephaseofresearchonanimalsgaveusessentialdatawhichmoveduson.Theknowledgesogainedisbeingusedtoprovidemoreeffectivetreatmentforseriouslydisabledhumans.Theresultstheyyieldbringanewoutlookonlifeformillionsaroundtheworld.Ifanimaltestingisbanned,howwillmedicinesbedeveloped?Willcureshavetobetriedonlyonhumans?Willtherebeenoughvolunteers?Howaboutlawsuitsbyfamiliesofvictimsofimperfectlydesignedcures?Acompletebanonanimaltestingwillhaveveryseriousnegativeeffectsonmedicalresearch.Ibelievethatdevelopingbetter,moreeffectiveandsaferdrugsismoreimportantthansparingafewrats.(反驳正方观点)Alternativestoanimaltestingmustbedevelopedbuteventhesealternativeswillrequireanimaltestinginordertocompareresults.Willtheanimalrightsactivistsendorse（赞同）anyresponsibilityofthedisastrouseffectsoftheirrosycuddlythoughts?Idoubtit..分论点（3）安全性需要Thethird,Itisimperative（必要的）thatalldrugsreleasedontothemarketaresafeforhumanstouse.Ifeelthatanimaltestingisnecessaryforthecontinuationofbiologicalandsafetyresearch.Evenwithanimal&peopletesting,dangerousproductsstillgetonthemarket,imaginehowmanymorewillbeonthemarketifwebananimaltesting.

论点2：物竞天择Animalrightsprotestersarejustabunchofcitydwellerswhodon'treallyunderstandhowlifeworks.Natureispredatory,thestrongestsurvive,andbytestingdrugsandmedicalresearchonanimalswhichcreatescuresforhumandiseases,thenthoseanimalsdiedtohelpussurvive.Asimpleextrapolationofthelawofnature.论点3：采取相应的弥补措施：Whileweshouldneverhurtanimalsintheinterestofpaltry（无价值的）cosmetics,researchforlife-savingdrugsandtechniquesrequireslimiteduseofrealanimals.Iagreethatanimaltestingshouldbecontinued,butagreewithanimalrightsadvocatesthatweshouldnotbeallowedtoturnablindeyetoanysuffering.

总结：Eventhemostmilitantanimalrightsactivistwouldhavetoadmitonething:ifgod-forbidoneofthemhadachildwhobecameveryill,hewoulda