前雅思考官-Simon的大作文范文36篇

(完好版)前雅思虑官-Simon的大作文范文36篇(完好版)前雅思虑官-Simon的大作文范文36篇(完好版)前雅思虑官-Simon的大作文范文36篇前雅思虑官Simon的大作文范文36篇Discussion：Somepeoplethinkthatstrictpunishmentsfordrivingoffencesarethekeytoreducingtrafficaccidents.Others,however,believethatothermeasureswouldbemoreeffectiveinimprovingroadsafety.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Peoplehavedifferingviewswithregardtothequestionofhowtomakeourroadssafer.Inmyview,bothpunishmentsandarangeofothermeasurescanbeusedtogethertopromotebetterdrivinghabits.Ontheonehand,strictpunishmentscancertainlyhelptoencouragepeopletodrivemoresafely.Penaltiesfordangerousdriverscanactasadeterrent,meaningthatpeopleavoidrepeatingthesameoffence.Therearevarioustypesofdrivingpenalty,suchassmallfines,licencesuspension,driverawarenesscourses,andevenprisonsentences.Theaimofthesepunishmentsistoshowdangerousdriversthattheiractionshavenegativeconsequences.Asaresult,wewouldhopethatdriversbecomemoredisciplinedandalert,andthattheyfollowtherulesmorecarefully.Ontheotherhand,Ibelievethatsafedrivingcanbepromotedinseveraldifferentwaysthatdonotpunishdrivers.Firstly,itisvitallyimportanttoeducatepeopleproperlybeforetheystarttodrive,andthiscouldbedoneinschoolsorevenaspartofanextendedormoredifficultdrivingtest.Secondly,moreattentioncouldbepaidtosaferoaddesign.Forexample,signscanbeusedtowarnpeople,speedbumpsandroadbendscanbeaddedtocalmtraffic,andspeedcamerascanhelptodeterpeoplefromdrivingtooquickly.Finally,governmentsorlocalcouncilscouldreduceroadaccidentsbyinvestinginbetterpublictransport,whichwouldmeanthatfewerpeoplewouldneedtotravelbycar.Inconclusion,whilepunishmentscanhelptopreventbaddriving,Ibelievethatotherroadsafetymeasuresshouldalsobeintroduced.1Somepeoplethinkthatinthemodernworldwearemoredependentoneachother,whileothersthinkthatpeoplehavebecomemoreindependent.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Peoplehavedifferentviewsaboutwhetherwearemoreorlessdependentonothersnowadays.Inmyview,modernlifeforcesustobemoreindependentthanpeoplewereinthepast.Therearetwomainreasonswhyitcouldbearguedthatwearemoredependentoneachothernow.Firstly,lifeismorecomplexanddifficult,especiallybecausethecostoflivinghasincreasedsodramatically.Forexample,youngadultstendtorelyontheirparentsforhelpwhenbuyingahouse.Propertypricesarehigherthanever,andwithouthelpitwouldbeimpossibleformanypeopletopayadepositandamortgage.Secondly,peopleseemtobemoreambitiousnowadays,andtheywantabetterqualityoflifefortheirfamilies.Thismeansthatbothparentsusuallyneedtoworkfull-time,andtheydependonsupportfromgrandparentsandbabysittersforchildcare.However,Iwouldagreewiththosewhobelievethatpeoplearemoreindependentthesedays.Inmostcountries,familiesarebecomingsmallerandmoredispersed,whichmeansthatpeoplecannotcountonrelativesasmuchastheyusedto.Wealsohavemorefreedomtotravelandlivefarawayfromourhometowns.Forexample,manystudentschoosetostudyabroadinsteadofgoingtotheirlocaluniversity,andthisexperiencemakesthemmoreindependentastheylearntolivealone.Anotherfactorinthisgrowingindependenceistechnology,whichallowsustoworkaloneandfromanypartoftheworld.Inconclusion,whiletherearesomereasonstobelievethatpeoplenowdependoneachothermore,myownviewisthatwearemoreindependentthanever.2Nowadaysanimalexperimentsarewidelyusedtodevelopnewmedicinesandtotestthesafetyofotherproducts.Somepeoplearguethattheseexperimentsshouldbebannedbecauseitismorallywrongtocauseanimalstosuffer,whileothersareinfavourofthembecauseoftheirbenefitstohumanity.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Itistruethatmedicinesandotherproductsareroutinelytestedonanimalsbeforetheyareclearedforhumanuse.WhileItendtowardstheviewpointthatanimaltestingismorallywrong,Iwouldhavetosupportalimitedamountofanimalexperimentationforthedevelopmentofmedicines.Ontheonehand,thereareclearethicalargumentsagainstanimalexperimentation.Touseacommonexampleofthispractice,laboratorymicemaybegivenanillnesssothattheeffectivenessofanewdrugcanbemeasured.Opponentsofsuchresearcharguethathumanshavenorighttosubjectanimalstothiskindoftrauma,andthatthelivesofallcreaturesshouldberespected.Theybelievethatthebenefitstohumansdonotjustifythesufferingcaused,andthatscientistsshouldusealternativemethodsofresearch.Ontheotherhand,reliablealternativestoanimalexperimentationmaynotalwaysbeavailable.Supportersoftheuseofanimalsinmedicalresearchbelievethatacertainamountofsufferingonthepartofmiceorratscanbejustifiedifhumanlivesaresaved.Theyarguethatopponentsofsuchresearchmightfeeldifferentlyifamemberoftheirownfamiliesneededamedicaltreatmentthathadbeendevelopedthroughtheuseofanimalexperimentation.Personally,Iagreewiththebanningofanimaltestingfornon-medicalproducts,butIfeelthatitmaybeanecessaryevilwherenewdrugsandmedicalproceduresareconcerned.Inconclusion,itseemstomethatitwouldbewrongtobantestingonanimalsforvitalmedicalresearchuntilequallyeffectivealternativeshavebeendeveloped.3Somepeoplethinkthatmuseumsshouldbeenjoyableplacestoentertainpeople,whileothersbelievethatthepurposeofmuseumsistoeducate.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouownopinion.Peoplehavedifferentviewsabouttheroleandfunctionofmuseums.Inmyopinion,museumscanandshouldbebothentertainingandeducational.Ontheonehand,itcanbearguedthatthemainroleofamuseumistoentertain.Museumsaretouristattractions,andtheiraimistoexhibitacollectionofinterestingobjectsthatmanypeoplewillwanttosee.Theaveragevisitormaybecomeboredifheorshehastoreadorlistentotoomucheducationalcontent,somuseumsoftenputmoreofanemphasisonenjoymentratherthanlearning.Thistypeofmuseumisdesignedtobevisuallyspectacular,andmayhaveinteractiveactivitiesorevengamesaspartofitsexhibitions.Ontheotherhand,somepeoplearguethatmuseumsshouldfocusoneducation.Theaimofanyexhibitionshouldbetoteachvisitorssomethingthattheydidnotpreviouslyknow.Usuallythismeansthatthehistorybehindthemuseumibitsneedsto’besexhexplained,andthiscanbedoneinvariousways.Somemuseumsemployprofessionalguidestotalktotheirvisitors,whileothermuseumsofferheadsetssothatvisitorscanlistentodetailedcommentaryabouttheexhibition.Inthisway,museumscanplayanimportantroleinteachingpeopleabouthistory,culture,scienceandmanyotheraspectsoflife.Inconclusion,itseemstomethatagoodmuseumshouldbeabletoofferaninteresting,enjoyableandeducationalexperiencesothatpeoplecanhavefunandlearnsomethingatthesametime.4Somepeoplebelievethatstudyingatuniversityorcollegeisthebestroutetoasuccessfulcareer,whileothersbelievethatitisbettertogetajobstraightafterschool.Discussbothviewsandgiveyouropinion.Whentheyfinishschool,teenagersfacethedilemmaofwhethertogetajoborcontinuetheireducation.Whiletherearesomebenefitstogettingajobstraightafterschool,Iwouldarguethatitisbettertogotocollegeoruniversity.Theoptiontostartworkstraightafterschoolisattractiveforseveralreasons.Manyyoungpeoplewanttostartearningmoneyassoonaspossible.Inthisway,theycanbecomeindependent,andtheywillbeabletoaffordtheirownhouseorstartafamily.Intermsoftheircareer,youngpeoplewhodecidetofindwork,ratherthancontinuetheirstudies,mayprogressmorequickly.Theywillhavethechancetogainrealexperienceandlearnpracticalskillsrelatedtotheirchosenprofession.Thismayleadtopromotionsandasuccessfulcareer.Ontheotherhand,Ibelievethatitismorebeneficialforstudentstocontinuetheirstudies.Firstly,academicqualificationsarerequiredinmanyprofessions.Forexample,itisimpossibletobecomeadoctor,teacherorlawyerwithouthavingtherelevantdegree.Asaresult,universitygraduateshaveaccesstomoreandbetterjobopportunities,andtheytendtoearnhighersalariesthanthosewithfewerqualifications.Secondly,thejobmarketisbecomingincreasinglycompetitive,andsometimestherearehundredsofapplicantsforonepositioninacompany.Youngpeoplewhodonothavequalificationsfromauniversityorcollegewillnotbeabletocompete.Forthereasonsmentionedabove,itseemstomethatstudentsaremorelikelytobesuccessfulintheircareersiftheycontinuetheirstudiesbeyondschoollevel.5Severallanguagesareindangerofextinctionbecausetheyarespokenbyverysmallnumbersofpeople.Somepeoplesaythatgovernmentsshouldspendpublicmoneyonsavingtheselanguages,whileothersbelievethatwouldbeawasteofmoney.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyouropinion.Itistruethatsomeminoritylanguagesmaydisappearinthenearfuture.Althoughitcanbearguedthatgovernmentscouldsavemoneybyallowingthistohappen,Ibelievethattheselanguagesshouldbeprotectedandpreserved.Thereareseveralreasonswhysavingminoritylanguagescouldbeseenasawasteofmoney.Firstly,ifalanguageisonlyspokenbyasmallnumberofpeople,expensiveeducationprogrammeswillbeneededtomakesurethatmorepeoplelearnit,andthestatewillhavetopayforfacilities,teachersandmarketing.Thismoneymightbebetterspentonotherpublicservices.Secondly,itwouldbemuchcheaperandmoreefficientforcountriestohavejustonelanguage.Governmentscouldcutallkindsofcostsrelatedtocommunicatingwitheachminoritygroup.Despitetheabovearguments,Ibelievethatgovernmentsshouldtrytopreservelanguagesthatarelesswidelyspoken.Alanguageismuchmorethansimplyameansofcommunication;ithasavitalconnectionwiththeculturalidentityofthepeoplewhospeakit.Ifalanguagedisappears,awholewayoflifewilldisappearwithit,andwewilllosetherichculturaldiversitythatmakessocietiesmoreinteresting.Byspendingmoneytoprotectminoritylanguages,governmentscanalsopreservetraditions,customsandbehavioursthatarepartofacountry’shistory.Inconclusion,itmaysavemoneyintheshorttermifweallowminoritylanguagestodisappear,butinthelongtermthiswouldhaveanextremelynegativeimpactonourculturalheritage.6Somepeoplethinkthatgovernmentsshouldgivefinancialsupporttocreativeartistssuchaspaintersandmusicians.Othersbelievethatcreativeartistsshouldbefundedbyalternativesources.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Peoplehavedifferentviewsaboutthefundingofcreativeartists.Whilesomepeopledisagreewiththeideaofgovernmentsupportforartists,Ibelievethatmoneyforartprojectsshouldcomefrombothgovernmentsandothersources.Someartprojectsdefinitelyrequirehelpfromthestate.IntheUK,therearemanyworksofartinpublicspaces,suchasstreetsorsquaresincitycentres.InLiverpool,forexample,thereareseveralnewstatuesandsculpturesinthedocksareaofthecity,whichhasbeenredevelopedrecently.Theseartworksrepresentculture,heritageandhistory.Theyservetoeducatepeopleaboutthecity,andactaslandmarksortalkingpointsforvisitorsandtourists.Governmentsandlocalcouncilsshouldpaycreativeartiststoproducethiskindofart,becausewithouttheirfundingourcitieswouldbemuchlessinterestingandattractive.Ontheotherhand,Icanunderstandtheviewtakenbymanypeoplethatartistsshouldnotexpectthestatetofundtheirwork.Mostmusiciansandthemajorityofpaintersmakealivingbyperformingorsellingtheirartisticcreationstofansorcollectors;theywouldnotexpecttoreceiveanyhelpfromtheirgovernments.Industrysponsorshipscanbeanotherusefulsourceofrevenueforcreativeartists.Forexample,mediacompanieslikethemobilegiantAppleareoftenwillingtopayhugefeestoinspirationaldesignerswhoworkontheiradvertisingcampaigns,productpackaging,andeventheappearanceoftheirelectronicdevices.Finally,someartistsmaybeluckyenoughtoreceivedonationsfromwealthyindividuals.Inconclusion,therearegoodreasonswhyartistsshouldrelyonalternativesourcesoffinancialsupport,butinmyopiniongovernmenthelpissometimesnecessary.7Somepeoplethinkthatalluniversitystudentsshouldstudywhatevertheylike.Othersbelievethattheyshouldonlybeallowedtostudysubjectsthatwillbeusefulinthefuture,suchasthoserelatedtoscienceandtechnology.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Peoplehavedifferentviewsabouthowmuchchoicestudentsshouldhavewithregardtowhattheycanstudyatuniversity.Whilesomearguethatitwouldbebetterforstudentstobeforcedintocertainkeysubjectareas,Ibelievethateveryoneshouldbeabletostudythecourseoftheirchoice.Therearevariousreasonswhypeoplebelievethatuniversitiesshouldonlyoffersubjectsthatwillbeusefulinthefuture.Theymayassertthatuniversitycourseslikemedicine,engineeringandinformationtechnologyaremorelikelytobebeneficialthancertainartdegrees.Fromapersonalperspective,itcanbearguedthatthesecoursesprovidemorejobopportunities,careerprogression,bettersalaries,andthereforeanimprovedqualityoflifeforstudentswhotakethem.Onthesocietallevel,byforcingpeopletochooseparticularuniversitysubjects,governmentscanensurethatanyknowledgeandskillgapsintheeconomyarecovered.Finally,afocusontechnologyinhighereducationcouldleadtonewinventions,economicgrowth,andgreaterfutureprosperity.Inspiteofthesearguments,Ibelievethatuniversitystudentsshouldbefreetochoosetheirpreferredareasofstudy.Inmyopinion,societywillbenefitmoreifourstudentsarepassionateaboutwhattheyarelearning.Besides,nobodycanreallypredictwhichareasofknowledgewillbemostusefultosocietyinthefuture,anditmaybethatemployersbegintovaluecreativethinkingskillsabovepracticalortechnicalskills.Ifthiswerethecase,perhapswewouldneedmorestudentsofart,historyandphilosophythanofscienceortechnology.Inconclusion,althoughitmightseemsensibleforuniversitiestofocusonlyonthemostusefulsubjects,Ipersonallypreferthecurrentsysteminwhichpeoplehavetherighttostudywhatevertheylike.8Manygovernmentsthinkthateconomicprogressistheirmostimportantgoal.Somepeople,however,thinkthatothertypesofprogressareequallyimportantforacountry.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Peoplehavedifferentviewsabouthowgovernmentsshouldmeasuretheircountries’progress.Whileeconomicprogressisofcourseessential,Iagreewiththosewhobelievethatothermeasuresofprogressarejustasimportant.Therearethreekeyreasonswhyeconomicgrowthisseenasafundamentalgoalforcountries.Firstly,ahealthyeconomyresultsinjobcreation,ahighlevelofemployment,andbettersalariesforallcitizens.Secondly,economicprogressensuresthatmoremoneyisavailableforgovernmentstospendoninfrastructureandpublicservices.Forexample,agovernmentwithhigherrevenuescaninvestinthecountry'stransportnetwork,itseducationsystemanditshospitals.Finally,astrongeconomycanhelpacountrystandingontheglobalstage,intermsofitspoliticalinfluenceandtradingpower.However,Iwouldarguethatvariousotherformsofprogressarejustassignificantastheeconomicfactorsmentionedabove.Inparticular,weshouldconsidertheareaofsocialjustice,humanrights,equalityanddemocracyitself.Forexample,thetreatmentofminoritygroupsisoftenseenasareflectionofthemoralstandardsandlevelofdevelopmentofasociety.Perhapsanotherkeyconsiderationwhenjudgingtheprogressofamoderncountryshouldbehowwellthatcountryprotectsthenaturalenvironment,andwhetheritismovingtowardsenvironmentalsustainability.Alternatively,thesuccessofanationcouldbemeasuredbylookingatthehealth,well-beingandhappinessofitsresidents.Inconclusion,theeconomyisobviouslyakeymarkerofacountry’ssuccess,butsocial,environmentalandhealthcriteriaareequallysignificant.9Somepeoplethinkthatasenseofcompetitioninchildrenshouldbeencouraged.Othersbelievethatchildrenwhoaretaughttoco-operateratherthancompetebecomemoreusefuladults.Discussboththeseviewsandgiveyourownopinion.Peoplehavedifferentviewsaboutwhetherchildrenshouldbetaughttobecompetitiveorco-operative.Whileaspiritofcompetitioncansometimesbeusefulinlife,Ibelievethattheabilitytoco-operateismoreimportant.Ontheonehand,competitioncanbeagreatsourceofmotivationforchildren.Whenteachersusegamesorprizestointroduceanelementofcompetitivenessintolessons,itcanencouragechildrentoworkhardertooutdotheotherpupilsintheclass.Thiskindofhealthyrivalrymayhelptobuildchildren-confidence,’swhileselfpushingthemtoworkindependentlyandprogressmorequickly.Whenthesechildrenleaveschool,theirconfidenceanddeterminationwillhelpthemincompetitivesituationssuchasjobinterviews.Itcanthereforebearguedthatcompetitionshouldbeencouragedinordertopreparechildrenforadultlife.Ontheotherhand,itisperhapsevenmoreimportanttopreparechildrenforthemanyaspectsofadultlifethatrequireco-operation.Intheworkplace,adultsareexpectedtoworkinteams,followinstructionsgivenbytheirsuperiors,orsuperviseandsupportthemorejuniormembersofstaff.Teamcollaborationskillsaremuchmoreusefulthanacompetitivedeterminationtowin.ThisistheattitudethatIbelieveschoolsshouldfosterinyoungpeople.Insteadofpromotingtheideathatpeopleareeitherwinnersorlosers,teacherscouldshowchildrenthattheygainmorefromworkingtogether.Inconclusion,Icanunderstandwhypeoplemightwanttoencouragecompetitivenessinchildren,butitseemstomethataco-operativeattitudeismuchmoredesirableinadultlife.10Report：1.Thesedaysmorefathersstayathomeandtakecareoftheirchildrenwhilemothersgoouttowork.Whatcouldbethereasonsforthis?Doyouthinkitisapositiveoranegativedevelopment?Itistruethatmenareincreasinglylikelytotakeontheroleofhousehusband,whilemorewomenthaneverarethebreadwinnersintheirfamilies.Therecouldbeseveralreasonsforthis,andIconsiderittobeaverypositivetrend.Inrecentyears,parentshavehadtoadapttovariouschangesinoursocieties.Equalrightsmovementshavemadegreatprogress,andithasbecomenormalforwomentogainqualificationsandpursueacareer.Ithasalsobecomesociallyacceptableformentostayathomeandlookaftertheirchildren.Atthesametime,therisingcostoflivinghasmeantthatbothmarriagepartnersusuallyneedtoworkandsavemoneybeforestartingafamily.Therefore,whencoupleshavechildren,theymaydecidewhoworksandwhostaysathomedependingonthepersonalpreferenceofeachpartner,orbasedonwhichpartnerearnsthemostmoney.Inmyview,thechangesdescribedaboveshouldbeseenasprogress.Weshouldbehappytoliveinasocietyinwhichmenandwomenhaveequalopportunities,andinwhichwomenarenotputunderpressuretosacrificetheircareers.Equally,itseemsonlyfairthatmenshouldbefreetoleavetheirjobsinordertoassumechildcareresponsibilitiesifthisiswhattheywishtodo.Couplesshouldbelefttomaketheirowndecisionsaboutwhichparentalroleeachpartnertakes,accordingtotheirparticularcircumstancesandneeds.Inconclusion,thechangingrolesofmenandwomeninthefamilyarearesultofwiderchangesinsociety,andIbelievethatthesedevelopmentsaredesirable.11Happinessisconsideredveryimportantinlife.Whyisitdifficulttodefine?Whatfactorsareimportantinachievinghappiness?Itisnodoubttruethatthemajorityofpeoplewouldliketobehappyintheirlives.Whilethepersonalnatureofhappinessmakesitdifficulttodescribe,theredoseemtobesomecommonneedsthatweallsharewithregardtoexperiencingorachievinghappiness.Happinessisdifficulttodefinebecauseitmeanssomethingdifferenttoeachindividualperson.Nobodycanfullyunderstandorexperienceanotherperson’sfeelings,andwehaveourownparticularpassionsfromwhichwetakepleasure.Somepeople,forexample,deriveasenseofsatisfactionfromearningmoneyorachievingsuccess,whereasforothers,healthandfamilyaremuchmoreimportant.Atthesametime,arangeofotherfeelings,fromexcitementtopeacefulness,maybeassociatedwiththeideaofhappiness,andthesamepersonmaythereforefeelhappyinavarietyofdifferentways.Althoughitseemsalmostimpossibletogiveaprecisedefinitionofhappiness,mostpeoplewouldagreethattherearesomebasicpreconditionstoachievingit.Firstly,itishardforapersontobehappyifheorshedoesnothaveasafeplacetoliveandenoughfoodtoeat.Ourbasicsurvivalneedsmustsurelybemetbeforewecanleadapleasantlife.Secondly,thegreatestjoyinlifeisusuallyfoundinsharedexperienceswithfamilyandfriends,anditisraretofindapersonwhoiscontenttoliveincompleteisolation.Otherkeyfactorscouldbeindividualfreedomandasenseofpurposeinlife.Inconclusion,happinessisdifficulttodefinebecauseitisparticulartoeachindividual,butIbelievethatourbasicneedsforshelter,foodandcompanyneedtobefulfilledbeforewecanexperienceit.12Inthedevelopedworld,averagelifeexpectancyisincreasing.Whatproblemswillthiscauseforindividualsandsociety?Suggestsomemeasuresthatcouldbetakentoreducetheimpactofageingpopulations.Itistruethatpeopleinindustrialisednationscanexpecttolivelongerthaneverbefore.Althoughtherewillundoubtedlybesomenegativeconsequencesofthistrend,societiescantakestepstomitigatethesepotentialproblems.Aspeoplelivelongerandthepopulationsofdevelopedcountriesgrowolder,severalrelatedproblemscanbeanticipated.Themainissueisthattherewillobviouslybemorepeopleofretirementagewhowillbeeligibletoreceiveapension.Theproportionofyounger,workingadultswillbesmaller,andgovernmentswillthereforereceivelessmoneyintaxesinrelationtothesizeofthepopulation.Inotherwords,anageingpopulationwillmeanagreatertaxburdenforworkingadults.Furtherpressureswillincludeariseinthedemandforhealthcare,andthefactyoungadultswillincreasinglyhavetolookaftertheirelderlyrelatives.Thereareseveralactionsthatgovernmentscouldtaketosolvetheproblemsdescribedabove.Firstly,asimplesolutionwouldbetoincreasetheretirementageforworkingadults,perhapsfrom65to70.Nowadays,peopleofthisagetendtobehealthyenoughtocontinueaproductiveworkinglife.Asecondmeasurewouldbeforgovernmentstoencourageimmigrationinordertoincreasethenumberofworkingadultswhopaytaxes.Finally,moneyfromnationalbudgetswillneedtobetakenfromotherareasandspentonvitalhealthcare,accommodationandtransportfacilitiesfortherisingnumbersofoldercitizens.Inconclusion,variousmeasurescanbetakentotackletheproblemsthatarecertaintoariseasthepopulationsofcountriesgrowolder.13Therearemanydifferenttypesofmusicintheworldtoday.Whydoweneedmusic?Isthetraditionalmusicofacountrymoreimportantthantheinternationalmusicthatisheardeverywherenowadays?Itistruethatarichvarietyofmusicalstylescanbefoundaroundtheworld.Musicisavitalpartofallhumanculturesforarangeofreasons,andIwouldarguethattraditionalmusicismoreimportantthanmodern,internationalmusic.Musicissomethingthataccompaniesallofusthroughoutourlives.Aschildren,wearetaughtsongsbyourparentsandteachersasameansoflearninglanguage,orsimplyasaformofenjoyment.Childrendelightinsingingwithothers,anditwouldappearthattheactofsinginginagroupcreatesaconnectionbetweenparticipants,regardlessoftheirage.Laterinlife,people’smusicalpreferencesdevelop,andwecometoseeourfavouritesongsaspartofourlifestories.Musicbothexpressesandarousesemotionsinawaythatwordsalonecannot.Inshort,itisdifficulttoimaginelifewithoutit.Inmyopinion,traditionalmusicshouldbevaluedovertheinternationalmusicthathasbecomesopopular.Internationalpopmusicisoftencatchyandfun,butitisessentiallyacommercialproductthatismarketedandsoldbybusinesspeople.Traditionalmusic,bycontrast,expressestheculture,customsandhistoryofacountry.Traditionalstyles,suchas...(example)...,connectustothepastandformpartofourculturalidentity.Itwouldbearealpityifpopmusicbecamesopredominantthatthesenationalstylesdisappeared.Inconclusion,musicisanecessarypartofhumanexistence,andIbelievethattraditionalmusicshouldbegivenmoreimportancethaninternationalmusic.14Nowadaysthewaymanypeopleinteractwitheachotherhaschangedbecauseoftechnology.Inwhatwayshastechnologyaffectedthetypesofrelationshipsthatpeoplemake?Hasthisbeenapositiveornegativedevelopment?Itistruethatnewtechnologieshavehadaninfluenceoncommunicationbetweenpeople.Technologyhasaffectedrelationshipsinvariousways,andinmyopiniontherearebothpositiveandnegativeeffects.Technologyhashadanimpactonrelationshipsinbusiness,educationandsociallife.Firstly,telephonesandtheInternetallowbusinesspeopleindifferentcountriestointeractwithoutevermeetingeachother.Secondly,serviceslikeSkypecreatenewpossibilitiesforrelationshipsbetweenstudentsandteachers.Forexample,astudentcannowtakevideolessonswithateacherinadifferentcityorcountry.Finally,manypeopleusesocialnetworks,likeFacebook,tomakenewfriendsandfindpeoplewhosharecommoninterests,andtheyinteractthroughtheircomputersratherthanfacetoface.Ontheonehand,thesedevelopmentscanbeextremelypositive.Cooperationbetweenpeopleindifferentcountrieswasmuchmoredifficultwhencommunicationwaslimitedtowrittenlettersortelegrams.Nowadays,interactionsbyemail,phoneorvideoarealmostasgoodasface-to-facemeetings,andmanyofusbenefitfromtheseinteractions,eitherinworkorsocialcontexts.Ontheotherhand,theavailabilityofnewcommunicationtechnologiescanalsohavetheresultofisolatingpeopleanddiscouragingrealinteraction.Forexample,manyyoungpeoplechoosetomakefriendsonlineratherthanmixingwiththeirpeersintherealworld,andthese‘virtual’relationshipsasubstituteforrealfriendships.Inconclusion,technologyhascertainlyrevolutionisedcommunicationbetweenpeople,butnotalloftheoutcomesofthisrevolutionhavebeenpositive.15Inrecentyears,therehasbeengrowinginterestintherelationshipbetweenequalityandpersonalachievement.Somepeoplebelievethatindividualscanachievemoreinegalitariansocieties.Othersbelievethathighlevelsofpersonalachievementarepossibleonlyifindividualsarefreetosucceedorfailaccordingtotheirindividualmerits.Whatisyourviewoftherelationshipbetweenequalityandpersonalsuccess?Inmyopinion,anegalitariansocietyisoneinwhicheveryonehasthesamerightsandthesameopportunities.Icompletelyagreethatpeoplecanachievemoreinthiskindofsociety.Educationisanimportantfactorwithregardtopersonalsuccessinlife.Ibelievethatallchildrenshouldhaveaccesstofreeschooling,andhighereducationshouldbeeitherfreeoraffordableforallthosewhochosetopursueauniversitydegree.Inasocietywithoutfreeschoolingoraffordablehighereducation,onlychildrenandyoungadultsfromwealthierfamilieswouldhaveaccesstothebestlearningopportunities,andtheywouldthereforebebetterpreparedforthejobmarket.Thiskindofinequalitywouldensurethesuccessofsomebutharmtheprospectsofothers.Iwouldarguethatequalrightsandopportunitiesarenotinconflictwithpeopletosucceedorfail.Inotherwords,equalitydoesnotmeanthatpeoplelosetheirmotivationtosucceed,orthattheyarenotallowedtofail.Onthecontrary,Ibelievethatmostpeoplewouldfeelmoremotivatedtoworkhardandreachtheirpotentialiftheythoughtthattheylivedinafairsociety.Thosewhodidnotmakethesameeffortwouldknowthattheyhadwastedtheiropportunity.Inequality,ontheotherhand,wouldbemorelikelytodemotivatepeoplebecausetheywouldknowthattheoddsofsuccesswerestackedinfavourofthosefromprivilegedbackgrounds.Inconclusion,itseemstomethatthereisapositiverelationshipbetweenequalityandpersonalsuccess.16Explainsomeofthewaysinwhichhumansaredamagingtheenvironment.Whatcangovernmentsdotoaddresstheseproblems?Whatcanindividualpeopledo?Humansareresponsibleforavarietyofenvironmentalproblems,butwecanalsotakestepstoreducethedamagethatwearecausingtotheplanet.Thisessaywilldiscussenvironmentalproblemsandthemeasuresthatgovernmentsandindividualscantaketoaddresstheseproblems.Twoofthebiggestthreatstotheenvironmentareairpollutionandwaste.Gasemissionsfromfactoriesandexhaustfumesfromvehiclesleadtoglobalwarming,whichmayhaveadevastatingeffectontheplanetinthefuture.Asthehumanpopulationincreases,wearealsoproducingevergreaterquantitiesofwaste,whichcontaminatestheearthandpollutesriversandoceans.Governmentscouldcertainlymakemoreefforttoreduceairpollution.Theycouldintroducelawstolimitemissionsfromfactoriesortoforcecompaniestouserenewableenergyfromsolar,windorwaterpower.Theycouldalsoimpose‘greentaxes’onandairlinecompanies.Inthisway,peoplewouldbeencouragedtousepublictransportandtotakefewerflightsabroad,thereforereducingemissions.Individualsshouldalsotakeresponsibilityfortheimpacttheyhaveontheenvironment.Theycantakepublictransportratherthandriving,chooseproductswithlesspackaging,andrecycleasmuchaspossible.Mostsupermarketsnowprovidereusablebagsforshoppersaswellas‘banks’forrecyclingglass,plasticandpaperintheircarparks.Byreusingandrecycling,wecanhelptoreducewaste.Inconclusion,bothnationalgovernmentsandindividualsmustplaytheirpartinlookingaftertheenvironment.17Manypeopleprefertowatchforeignfilmsratherthanlocallyproducedfilms.Whycouldthisbe?Shouldgovernmentsgivemorefinancialsupporttolocalfilmindustries?Itistruethatforeignfilmsaremorepopularinmanycountriesthandomesticallyproducedfilms.Therecouldbeseveralreasonswhythisisthecase,andIbelievethatgovernmentsshouldpromotelocalfilm-makingbysubsidisingtheindustry.Therearevariousreasonswhymanypeoplefindforeignfilmsmoreenjoyablethanthefilmsproducedintheirowncount