约克大学summer math 宏观经济 lecture 1_第1页
约克大学summer math 宏观经济 lecture 1_第2页
约克大学summer math 宏观经济 lecture 1_第3页
约克大学summer math 宏观经济 lecture 1_第4页
约克大学summer math 宏观经济 lecture 1_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩45页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

MacroeconomicsLecture1:IntroductionReadingKeyResources:CourseTextbook:Blanchard,Olivier,AlessiaAmighiniandFrancescoGiavazzi(2010).Macroeconomics:AEuropeanPerspective.PearsonEducationCourseVirtualLearningEnvironment(VLE):www.vle.york.ac.ukLecturenotesandothercoursematerialwillbeuploadedhere.Macroeconomics:OverviewWhyStudyMacroeconomics?Perhapsself-evidentinthecurrenteconomicclimate.ThestudyofaggregatesGDPUnemploymentInflationDebtInterestratesCurrenciesThestudyoftheinteractionoftheseaggregates,andofthemarketsinwhichtheseaggregatesaredeterminedGeneralEquilibriumMacroeconomics:MethodologyThiscoursefocuseson‘mainstream’macroeconomicanalysisThisisasynthesisofKeynesianandneo-classicaleconomicsThemethodologyofthemainstreamistouseeconomicmodelsModelsaremathematicalabstractionsofrealityDigression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsInthephysicalsciencesithasbeenlongrecognisedthattherearemeritstoaquantitativeapproach:“Ifyouknowathingonlyqualitatively,youknowitnomorethanvaguely.Ifyouknowitquantitatively–graspingsomenumericalmeasurethatdistinguishesitfromaninfinitenumberofotherpossibilities–youarebeginningtoknowitdeeply.Youcomprehendsomeofitsbeautyandyougainaccesstoitspowerandtheunderstandingitprovides.Beingafraidofquantificationistantamounttodisenfranchisingyourself,givingupononeofthemostpotentprospectsforunderstandingandchangingtheworld.”

CarlSaganDigression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsThePhilosophyofScienceInthephysicalsciences,aconsensusofscientificmethodhaspainfullybeenestablished:Copernicus,BrunoetcThe‘AgeofEnlightenment’–especiallyassociatedwiththeemergenceofeconomicsasadiscipline(Smith,Milletc)Thatmethod(especiallyassociatedwithKarlPopper)is:hypothesisconstruction(theorizing–e.g.Newton)–leadingto:Empiricaltestingofhypotheses(e.g.ImplicationofNewton’stheorythatlightindependentofgravity)–leadingtoRejectionoftheories,andconstructionofnewbettertheories(Einstein’stheoryofrelativity)Returntostage1.Digression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsPopperianfalsification,paradoxically,allowsaccumulationofknowledge.TheScientificapproachisfacilitatedthroughtheuseofmathematicsClarityofargumentResearcherscaninvokelawsofmathematicsinboththeorizing(e.g.tryreadingEinstein’stheoryofrelativity)andinempiricaltesting(e.g.Trialsofnewdrugsfollowverystrictstatisticalexamination)Sointhe‘NaturalSciences’thebattlehasbeen‘won’.NotePopperianfalsificationisnottheonlypossiblephilosophicalbasisforscience.Thereareother‘constructivist’alternatives-e.g.ThomasKuhn.Butthesealsoexpediateuseofmathematics.Digression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsInthesocialsciences,thereisnosuchconsensusTheapproachtakenbyeconomicsistofollowthemethodologyemployedinnaturalsciences.Thischaracterisesthe‘mainstream’–atleastsinceaboutthe1960sOther‘socialsciences’havetodatebeenmorepredisposedtofollowdifferentmethodologiesPolitics,History:notethereareoftenoverlapswitheconomicsintermsofwhatisbeinganalysedNarrativeApproachesTextuallybasedanalysisDigression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsConsequencesofdifferentmethodologicalapproachesinthesocialsciencesDisciplinesfinditdifficulttotalktoeachother...EspeciallyimportantforacademiceconomiststocommunicatebetterArguablythefollowingdifferenceinemphasisalsoarises:Narrativeapproachesemphasisethe‘special’.Eventsareuniqueinhistoryandresearchidentifiesanddescribesuniqueelementsofparticularevents.Theeconomicapproachemphasisesthe‘general’.Modelsaretypicallyaimedtobeuniversal.Thoughnotealsosome(better)economicapproachesemphasiseconditionality.Notealsosomenarrativeapproachesaregeneral(e.g.KarlMarx,orFrederikHayek).Digression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsMoreimportantlytheapplicationofPopperianfalsification(orconstructivistphilosophyofscience)insocialsciencepresentsparticularproblems:Theoreticaldifficulties:we’redealingwithhighlyevolvedcomplexentities(i.e.Humanbeingsratherthanparticlesinavacuum).e.g.therationalexpectationsrevolution/Lucascritiqueetc.Empiricaldifficulties:identificationofcauseandeffectisdifficultbecause‘controlandtreatment’,i.e.laboratoryconditions,cannotinmostinstancesberecreated

Digression:theuseofmathematicsineconomics

“AnIndianborneconomistonceexplainedhispersonaltheoryofreincarnationtohisgraduateeconomicsclass,”PaulKrugmanwritesintheopeningparagraphofhisPrefacetoPeddlingProsperity.“‘Ifyouareagoodeconomist,avirtuouseconomist,’hesaid,‘youarerebornasaphysicist.Butifyouareanevil,wickedeconomist,youarerebornasasociologist.”Krugmanthencontinues,“Asociologistmightsaythatthisquoteshowswhatiswrongwitheconomists:theywantasubjectthatisfundamentallyabouthumanbeingstohavethemathematicalcertaintyofthehardsciences....Butgoodeconomistsknowthatthespeakerwastalkingaboutsomethingelseentirely:thesheerdifficultyofthesubject.Economicsisharderthanphysics;luckilyitisnotquiteashardassociology.”(1994:xi)Digression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsWhyisEconomicsharderthanPhysics?

1.Wearegrapplingwithcomplexentities(humanbeings)afortiorimacroeconomics...Yesitisdifficult.Butdoesthisfactmeanweshouldrejectmathematicalformulationofeconomicissues?Digression:theuseofmathematicsineconomics2.Difficulttoconstructvalidtestsoftheories.e.g.What’stheeffectofafiscalstimulus?Keynesiantheorypredictsexpansion,Classicaltheorypredictsnoeffect.Theproblemoftheabsenceofcounter-factual.Notwocountriesthesame,notworecessionsexactlythesame–socomparisonisdifficult.Nonethelessthereisawealthofstatisticalevidenceandexperience.Shouldthisbeignored?Shouldthisnotbequantified?Digression:theuseofmathematicsineconomicsLastword:/dani_rodriks_weblog/2007/09/why-we-use-math.html“Weusemathsnotbecausewearesmart,butbecausewearenotsmartenough”DaniRodrikSeealsoessaybyPaulKrugman/krugman/www/dishpan.htmlBacktothecourse...WewillbeexaminingmathematicalmodelsofthemacroeconomythisweekIS/LMClosedeconomyOpeneconomyAS/ADKeynesiantheoriesClassicaltheoriesModelsofeconomicgrowthBacktothecourse...Youshouldapproachallofthesemodelsfromascientificperspective.i.e.trytosuppressanypreconceptions/ideologyyoumighthave...expecttochangeyourmindThetheoriesyouwillseedonotrepresentuniversaltruththoughtheyshouldatleastbeinternallyconsistentNotealsothat(empiricalorapriori)rejectionofoneelementofamodeldoesnotconstituterejectionofallofthemodel.Issues(perennial)VolatilityoftheMacroeconomyThegreatmoderation(c.1980-2008)Thegreatrecession(2008-nearfuture?)Thegreatstagnation(2008-distantfuture?)PersistenceofmacroeconomicvariablesInternationaldifferencesinmacroeconomicperformanceIssues(specific,contemporaneous)CurrentrecessionCreditcrunchSovereignandbank-sectordebtMacroeconomicpolicyMonetarypolicyFiscalpolicyRestructuringoffinancialsectorInternationallinkagesGlobalisationFinancialcontagionMacroeconomicvariablesGrossDomesticProduct–thevalueofoutputproducedinaneconomyinayear.InNominalterms,conceptuallyatleastonewayofcalculatingthisistosimplyaggregatealltransactions(notepracticaldifficultiesofdoingthis),i.e. foranNgoodeconomy(expenditureapproach)GDPNotecomparingovertimewouldnotbeagoodindicatoroftherealvolumeofoutputproducedgivennon-zeroinflation.Nbwhyareweinterestedintherealvolumeofoutput?DeterminesrealaggregateconsumptionStandardoflivingmeasureGDPInordertosimplifynotation:

P=thepricelevel Y=realGDPNotethatneitherthepricelevelnorrealGDPareeasilyobservedUKNominalGDP1957-2011GDPandthe‘Pricelevel’RealGDPestimatedfromtotalnominalGDP(moreorlessobservable)andanappropriatelyestimatedpriceindexP.MeasuresofP:TheGDPdeflatorTheConsumerPriceIndexTheRetailPriceIndexTheProducerPriceIndexetcUKPriceindexPricesandinflationTherateofincreaseofthePriceindexistheinflationrateUKInflationUKCPIinflation2-2TheOtherMajorMacroeconomicVariablesTheInflationRateTheinflationrates,computedusingeithertheCPIortheGDPdeflator,arelargelysimilar.U.S.InflationRate,UsingtheCPIandtheGDPDeflator

Since1960Figure2-4TheConsumerPriceIndexGDPThengiven‘PY’

and‘P’,realGDPisconstructed:RealGDPisameasureofthevolumeofoutputNotemeasurementdifficulties–especiallychangingqualityofgoods:putersUKRealandNominalGDPUKrealGDPUKrealGDP1957-2011StylizedfactsAveragegrowthrateof0.75%Suggestionofrecentdecrease?VolatilityaroundthataverageGreatervolatilityinearlyyears‘Greatmoderation’Impressiverecentrecession...UKrealGDP1957-2011Similar(thoughnotidenticalofcourse)patternsemergeinothercountries...Somesmalldifferencesinpost-wartrendgrowthSomedifferencesinoverallvolatilityHeterogeneityinthecurrentrecessionHistoricheterogeneityintimingofpreviouscyclesBusinesscycleconvergenceinrecentdecadesGlobalisation?GermanyrealgrowthGreecerealgrowth:noteaxisscaleIrelandrealgrowthItalyrealgrowthSpanishrealgrowthrealGDPBecausethere(tosomeextent)appearstobeaconstant(ish)growthrateinthelongrunitisconvenienttotransformtherealGDPdataintologarithmsThis(approximately)linearizesthedataTakinglogarithmsdoesnotaddorsubtractanythingfromtheunderlyingdata LogrealGDP(UKdata)SeparatingtrendandcycleSeparatingtrendandcycleNotethatthetrendhastobeestimated.Therearevariousalternativemethodsofdoingthis,thoughnoconsensusonthe‘best’way.(thepreviousslideusedtheHodrick-Prescottfilter)ThekeypointisthatthedriversofthetrendandcyclicalmovementsaretypicallymodeledtobedifferentSeparatingtrendandcycleBlancharddistinguishesbetweentheShortrun“afewyears”:focusesonwhyactualGDPmightbedifferentfromtrendGDP(or‘potentialoutput’)DemandshocksSupplyshocksMediumrun“adecadeorso”:focusesonthereturnofGDPtothetrendIssuesofstabilityandforceofequilibratingfactorsinmarketsLongrun“halfacenturyormore”:focusesonthedeterminantsofthetrendFactorsofproductionFactorproductivity(institutions,technology)LongruntrendgrowthintheUK1957-2011Rapidgrowthinthe1960sAverageannualgrowthofrealGDPof3%1957-1969Slowdowninthe1970sAverageannualgrowthofrealGDPof1.7%1969-19821982-1997:2.67%1997-2007:2.94%2008-2011:-0.98%LongruntrendgrowthintheUK1957-2011Drivers:Post-warconvergence(recalltheSolowmodel)Slow-downoftechnologicalprogresscombinedwithresourcescarcityinthe1970sITrevolutionc.1990-presentInstitutions1-1(Blanchard):TheUnitedStatesTable1-1Growth,Unemployment,andInflationintheUnitedStatesSince19701970–2006(average)1996–2006(average)200620072008Outputgrowthrate3.1%3.4%3.3%2.1%2.5%Unemploymentrate6.25.0Inflationrate4.02.0Outputgrowthrate:annualrateofgrowthofoutput(GDP).Unemploymentrate:averageovertheyear.Inflationrate:annualrateofchangeofthepricelevel(GDPdeflator).Theperiod1996-2006wasoneofthebestdecadesinrecentmemory:Theaveragerateofgrowthwas3.4%peryear.Theaverageunemploymentratewas5.0%.

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

最新文档

评论

0/150

提交评论