写作高分班-lesson4-版_第1页
写作高分班-lesson4-版_第2页
写作高分班-lesson4-版_第3页
写作高分班-lesson4-版_第4页
写作高分班-lesson4-版_第5页
免费预览已结束,剩余14页可下载查看

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

ToTowhatextentdoyouagreeor3.(写了100词以后!写不下去4.!我到底赞不赞同6.段只能讲解段只能讲解你自己的观点或者陈述事实绝对不要 (出现的几率最低,因为题目中经常出现限定词(比较高的可能性,怼起来很爽。但是你的怼人能力有限。一分为二地来看问题(其实相当于部分赞同partly但我要求尽可能是一个明确的个人观点,要求比较高的掌控力①.虽然我承认……,但是我认为(必须确认题目能被分出清晰的两部分,一部分对,一部分错②.我认为是否应该……取决于(别乱用,一定要确保有明确的划分标准改写观点,然后表达改写观点,然后表达完全赞同赞同理由-赞同理由-赞同理由-Inconclusion,重复自己的观点SomeSomepeoplethinkthatunpaidcommunityserviceshouldbeacompulsorypartofhighschoolprogrammes(suchasworkingforacharity,improvingtheneighbourhoodorteachingsportstoyoungchildren).TowhatextentdoyouagreeorSomepeoplehavebenefitedfrommoderncommunicationSomepeoplehavebenefitedfrommoderncommunicationtechnology,butsomegroupsofpeoplehavenotbenefitedatall.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?The21stcenturyhasseenalargenumberofchangesthatare ourwildestexpectations.Oneoftheseadvancesistherapiddevelopmentofcommunicationstechnology.Theadvantagesofconvenienceandhighefficiencybroughtbydigitalcommunicationareobvious,butIdonotthinkthateveryonehasaccesstothesebenefits.Digitalformsofcommunicationenablemanypeople,mainlyincludingstudents,familiesaswellasentrepreneurs,toreapthe umbenefits.Fromaneducational ,learningcanbeincrediblyefficientandeffective,asstudentshavingtheinternetconnectioncanvirtuallysolvealltheirpuzzlesbybrowsingteachingwebsitesoraskingforhelpfromteacherssimultaneously.Internet-basedcommunicationalsocontributespositivelytostrengtheningfamilyrelationshipsandincreasingclosenessbetweenfamilymembers.Forexample,studentswhoattendboardingschoolsorstudya reabletokeepindailycontacteasilywithparentsbysendinggreetingmessagesorcamerachatting.Whatismore,companiescanberunatamuchlowercostbecausetheinternetandcomputershelptoexpandbusinesscheaplyandbecauseinformationtechnologyallowsemployeestoworkathome,whichsavesmostoftherentsforofficespace.However,Iwouldarguethatthebenefitsofinformationandcommunicationtechnologyarerestrictedtocertaingroupsofusers.Inotherwords,somepeople,particularlytheoldandthepoor,arenotbeneficiariesofmodernwaysofcommunication.Withregardtotheformer,alargepercentageofelderlypeopleareunableandreluctanttoadapttonewtechnology,whi eansthattheybarelyenjoytheconvenienceandfunbroughtbythedevices.Asforpeoplelivinginextremepoverty,mobilephones,computersandanyotherelectronicdevicesareluxuries.Allweb-basedactivitiesmeannothingtothem,neithermakingthemrelaxednorprovidingthemwithcareeropportunities.Inconclusion,Iagreewiththeideathattechnologicaladvancesininformationandcommunicationhaveonlybroughtbenefitstoacertaingroupofpeople,eventhoughitisalargegroup.完全不赞同逻辑的使用比例比完全赞同多得多,这是因完全不赞同逻辑的使用比例比完全赞同多得多,这是因为有的题目读起来简直丧心病狂。作为作者,只想怼死这个提出观点的人,所以就直接针对题目里的各个点进行反驳就好。改写观点,然后表达改写观点,然后表达完全不赞同不赞同理由-不赞同理由-不赞同理由-Inconclusion,重复自己的观点SomeSomepeoplebelievethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury,soprotectingthemisawasteofresources.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?Somepeoplearguethatitispointlesstospendmoneyontheprotectionofwildanimalsbecausewehumanshavenoneedforthem.I ydisagreewiththispointofInmyopinion,itisabsurdtoarguethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury.IdonotbelievethatplanetEarthexistsonlyforthebenefitofhumans,andthereisnothingspecialaboutthisparticularcenturythatmeansthatwesuddenlyhavetherighttoalloworencouragetheextinctionofanyspecies.Furthermore,thereisnocompellingreasonwhyweshouldletanimalsdieout.Wedonotneedtoexploitordestroyeverylastsquaremetreoflandinordertofeedor modatetheworld’spopulation.Thereisplentyofroomforustoexistsidebysidewithwildanimals,andthisshouldbeouraim.IalsodisagreewiththeideathatIalsodisagreewiththeideathatprotectinganimalsisawasteofresources.Itisusuallytheprotectionofnaturalhabitatsthatensuresthesurvivalofwildanimals,andmostscientistsagreethatthesehabitatsarealsocrucialforhumansurvival.Forexample,rainforestsproduceoxygen,absorbcarbondioxideandstabilisetheEarth’sclimate.Ifwedestroyedtheseareas,thecostsofmanagingtheresultingchangestoourplanetwouldfaroutweighthecostsofconservation.Byprotectingwildanimalsandtheirhabitats,wemaintainthenaturalbalanceofalllifeonEarth.Inconclusion,wehavenorighttodecidewhetherornotwildanimalsshouldexist,andIbelievethatweshoulddoeverythingwecantoprotectthemSomeSomepeoplethinkthatcompaniesshouldhavethesamenumberofmaleandfemaleemployees.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?Itisundeniablethatmenandwomenshouldhaveequalaccesstojobopportunities.However,Icomple yItisundeniablethatmenandwomenshouldhaveequalaccesstojobopportunities.However,Icomple ydisagreewiththeideathatthenumberofmalesandfemalesinacompanyshouldbeexactlythesame.ofall,manycompaniesaremoreattractivetoonegenderthantheother,sothenumberofjobapplicantsishighlylikelytobeone-sided,meaningthatitisalmostimpossibletorecruitthesamberfrombothsexes.Forexample,acompanyengagingintheconstructionindustrywillreceivemostofapplicationsfrommen,withfewwomeninterestedinitspositions.Asaresult,havingthesamberofmenandwomeninsuchacompanyseemsunrealistic.AnotherreasonwhyIamagainstthegivenopinionisthatitissimplyunfairtobaseemploymentforapositionont derofanapplicant.Ifamalecandidateisthebestchoiceforapositioninacompany,itissurelywrongtorejecthiminfavourofafemalewithlowercompetenceandfewerqualifications.Companiesshouldtreatallcandidatesfairlybyconsideringtheirworkexperience,expertiseandsocialskills,etc.,ratherthantheirgender.Finally,althoughanequalnumberofemployeesofeachsexseeminglymakespositivecontributionstoimprovinggenderequalityinjobmarket,itislikelythatworkefficiencyofacompanyadoptingsuchapolicywillbenegativelyaffected.Thisisbecausemalesoutperformfemalesincertainjobs,andviceversa.Forexample,ifaprivatehospitalhada50:50splitofmaleandfemalenurses,therewouldbealotofcomplaintsasaresultofthesignificantdifferencebetweenmenandwomenintermsoftheirabilitiestotakecareofpatients.Inconclusion,theselectionofemployeesshouldbebasedonfactorsInconclusion,theselectionofemployeesshouldbebasedonfactorsthatrepresentacandidate’squalitiesandqualifications.ItwouldbecounterproductivetomakeaselectiondecisiononIndividualsIndividualscandonothingtochangesociety.developmentscanbeonlybroughtaboutandlargeinstitutions.Towhatextentdoyouagree.Opinionsaredividedonwhetheritispossibleforindividualstomakechangestosociety.Ibelievetherearemanyexamplesofindividualscientists,inventorsorevenpoliticalactivistswhohavemadesignificantcontributionswhichhavebenefitedtheirsocietiesormankindingeneral.Therefore,Icomple ydisagreewiththegivenstatement.Onefieldinwhichindividualshavemadepositivechangesisthatofscience,examplesofwhicharemedicineandelectricity.Withregardtotheformer,aBritishscientistcalledSirAlexanderFlemingaccidentallydiscoveredpenicillinwhenhenoticedthatbacteriacouldnotsurvivenearcertainfungi.Thisdiscovery,the antibiotic,hassavedmillionsoflives.Asfaraselectricityisconcerned,perhapsthegreatestscientistofallwasNicolaTesla,withoutwhoseinventionsinthisfieldwemightnothavethesafesystemofdistributingelectricitybyalternatingcurrentthatwehavetoday.AmonghisotherinventionswereradiowaveswhichareusedtobroadcastTVandradio,andofcoursewifi.Apartfromscience,anumberofpoliticalactivistshavealsomadesignificantcontributionstotheirsocieties,andhavehelpedtowinfreedomfortheirpeople.PerhapsthemostfamousofthesewasMahatmaGandhi,an nlawyerwhohelpedtowinindependenceforhisnationfromtheBritishwithhisuniquestyleofpeaceful,whichwaslateraninspirationtootherleadersinthe20thcentury.Forexample,intheUS,ablackcivilrightsleadercalledMartinLutherKingacknowledgedtheinfluenceofGandhi.King’spassionatestyleandnon-violent sagainstsegregationhelpedtobringaboutpoliticalchangeforblackpeopleinthatcountry.Inconclusion,thescientists,inventors,andactivistsmentionedaboveshowclearlythatindividualscancontributegreatlytotheirsocieties,soitisnottruethattheycannotchangesociety.思思考这个问在历史者带来了很多和。有人认为如果女性来承角色的话,她们能创造更和平的世界。你是否赞同此观点.占到占到80%以上的覆覆盖更全面的一分为二逻改写陈述题目观点。Ibelievethat一句话写出你的清晰观(前面所提到的两种一分为二方法Itistruethat…/Iacceptthat…/Iadmitthat…(这里有n种方法来写topicHowever/Nevertheless,IwouldarguethatInconclusion,重复自己的观点和看法Schoolsshouldstopteachingchildrenwithbooksstudentsthinkboring,anduse,gamescomputerinstead.Towhatextentdoyouagreeor“虽然…但是…”的一分Itisbelievedthattraditionaltextbooks,whichappeartobelessappealingtostudents,shouldgivewaytovariouselectronicteachingtools,suchas gamesorfi ally,IpartlyagreewiththisOntheonehand,theintroductionoftechnologicalteachingmethodscouldcontributepositivelytoimprovinglearningeffects.Theprocessofimpartingknowledgeintheformofsoundsandmotionscanbefarmoreeffectivethanthatdonewithwordsandillustrations.Forexample,pupilsexposedtounconventionalwaysofteaching,whetheritisafilmintroducingthehistoryofScotlandoracomputergamedesignedtoenhancemathematicalskills,aremorelikelytoeasilyunderstandwhattheteacheristeachingthanthosewhoaretaughtwithprintedmaterials.“虽然…但是…”的一分Ontheotherhand,despitetheadvantageofteachingwithelectronicdevices,Idonotthinkthatcomple yremovingtextbooksfromtheclasscanbejustified.Forsomesubjects,suchasliteratureandphilosophy,usingtextbooksisasuperiorwayofstudyingbecausewordsbetterstimulatestudents’imagination.Thisability,however,wouldbeunderminediftheclasswastaughtwithTVdramasorfi asalltheinformationisalreadyavailableandseeninthesamewaybyallviewers.Inconclusion,Iagreethatitisentirelyreasonableforschoolstoapplytechnologyineducationduetoitsadvantagesintermsofbeingvisuallyandaudiblyappealing.However,Iamnotinsupportofstop theuseoftraditionaltextbooksbecausetheyplaysignificantrolesincertainsubjectsthatrequireconcentrationandimagination.““取决于”的一分Task2:Toooneyisspentlookingafterandoldbuildings.Weshouldknockthemdownandbuildonesinstead.Doyouagreeor“取决于”的一分 ernmentsarefacedwiththedilemmaofwhethertospendahugeamountofmoneyprotectingoldbuildingsorsimplyknockthemdown.Inmyopinion,whetheranoldbuildingshouldbetorndownandmakewayforanewonemainlydependsonitsvalueintermsofartandhistory.Ontheonehand,itisnotwiseforthe ernmenttoinvestfinancialandotherresourcesinprotectingsomevaluelessoldbuildingsinspiteoftheircenturialexistence.Ifahouseortowercloselyresembleshundredsofotherbuildingsintermsofdesignandfunction,thenitwouldbeawasteofmoneytokeepitalive.The ernmentinsteadshouldconsidermakingspaceformodernbuildings,especiallythosehigh-riseones,whichwillbefollowedbyarangeofbenefits,suchasincreasingaffordablehousingsupplyandimprovinglivingconditions.“取决于”的一分Ontheotherhand,itisundoubtedlyworthwhiletopreservebuildingswithhistoricandartisticmeaningsevenatasignificantcost.The reasonisthatthesebuildingsattractpeoplefromdomesticcitiesandallovertheworld.Whetherthefeelingispatrioticorexotic,visitorstothesemeaningfulsitescanbespirituallysatisfiedandatthesametimemakeeconomiccontributionstothecity.Inaddition,today'sdesignersmaybeabletolearnfromsomecreativelydesignedandwellerectedbuildings.Forexample,acentury-oldmansionmaybeatextbookteachingmoderndevelopershowtoconstructhousesthatcouldwithstandthefiercestofhurricane.Inconclusion,Idonotagreethatalloldbuildingsshouldbedemolishedwithouttakingtheiruniquemeaningsintoconsideration.Culturallyandhistoricallyvaluableoldarchitecturalworksareworthpreservingandprotecting.1.改写原题观点2.改写原题观点3.事实背景+是是否赞同的介绍Increasingthepriceofpetrolisthebestwaytosolvegrowingtrafficandpollutionproblems.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisopinion?版本一:Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.Icomple ydisagreewiththis版本二:Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.AlthoughIbelievethathigherfuelpricescanreducethenumberofcarsonthestreet,Idonotagreethatasimpleriseinthepriceisenough.SomeSomepeoplethinkthatinsteadofpreventingclimatechange,we/

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论