新GRE argument 模板 原创

开头：In this argument, the arguer arrives at the conclusion that . The conclusion is based on . In addition to this, the arguer provides evidence/cites the result of a survey that . Although this argument seems reasonable at the first glance, this argument is problematic in that it suffers from several critical fallacies. The reasons are stated as follows.Alternative explanations:First of all, the arguer commits a fallacy in assuming that can simply be attributed to . While admittedly, . might be an element in ., it is hardly the only one. To establish a direct relationship between AA and BB, other conditions should be eliminated. Such conditions include . Perhaps or . Thus, . As a result, without ruling out such alternative explanations for .,the argument is not persuasive enough to conclude that .Assumptions&不同:Secondly, even the assumption that. is convincing, its unwarranted for the author to assumes that (同 ) . It is entirely possible that（不同或者变化）outweigh the surface similarities, and thus, 不成功untenable. For example,. Or perhaps, .Thus,导致不同.As a result, the argument is definitely flawed unless the author can convince me that (all the conditions that related to (.) have remained unchanged during this period of time/the same).Specific evidence:Finally, even if the evidence turns out to be valid, the arguer unfairly assumes that . Nevertheless, the arguer offers no evidence to substantiate this crucial assumption. Thus, there is no guarantee that . and its warranted to doubt that 。 。 。. For instance, its very likely that . . And as a result, . So only if such kind of possibilities are eliminated can the author .结尾：To sum up, the argument lacks credibility and persuasiveness because of the invalid evidence cited and seriously flawed logical reasoning. To bolster the conclusion, its better for the arguer to provide the information with respect to.(the imparity between AA and BB). and eliminate alternative explanations. Meanwhile, further investigation and analysis is needed. If the given factors above are taken into consideration, the argument would have been more advisable(reasonable) and logically acceptable.商业大环境小不能指大（