




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
金程教育FRM根底班讲义
OperationalRiskManagement讲师:吴坚隽日期:2021年8月地点:■上海□北京□深圳11吴坚隽2StudySessionProportionQuestionFoundationsofRiskManagement10%14questionsQuantitativeAnalysis10%14questionsFinancialMarketsandProducts15%21questionsValuationandRiskModels15%21questionsMarketRiskMeasurementandManagement10%14questionsCreditRiskMeasurementandManagement10%14questionsOperationalandIntegratedRiskManagement10%14questionsRiskManagementandInvestmentManagement10%14questionsCurrentIssuesinFinancialMarkets10%14questionsTotal:
100FRM课程框架3OutlineOperationalRiskWarmUp:WhyOperationalRisk?DefinitionofOperationalRiskMeasurementofOperationalRiskManagementofOperationalRiskOtherRisksrelatedtoOperationalRiskTechnologyRiskDaylightOverdraftRiskModelRisk4WhatIsRiskandRiskManagement?ReputationalRiskRiskEarningsVolatilityManagementofthedriversofearningsvolatilityManagementoftheperceptionofmanagementstrengthandcorporateculture5DriversofEarningsVolatilityEarningsVolatilityCreditRiskMarketRiskOperationalRisksBusiness/StrategicRisks6TheRiskTree7CaseHistoriesofOperationalRiskFeb2002AlliedIrishBank(US$691mloss)Aroguetrader,JohnRusnack,
hides3yearsoflosingtradesontheyen/dollarexchangerateattheU.S.
subsidiary.Thebank’sreputationisdamaged.Mar1997NatWest($127mloss)Aswaptiontrader,KyriacosPapouis,
deliberatelycoversuplossesbymis-pricingandover-valuingoptioncontracts.
Thebank’sreputationisdamaged:NatWestiseventuallytakenoverbytheRoyal
BankofScotland.Sept1996MorganGranfell(US$720million)Afund
manager,PeterYoung,exceedshisguidelines,leadingtoalargeloss.Deutsche
Bank,theGermanownerofMGAM,agreestocompensatetheinvestorsinthefund.8Jun1996Sumitomo(US$2.6billionloss)Acoppertraderamassesunreportedlossesover3years.YasuoHamanaka,knownas“Mr.FivePercent,〞aftertheproportionofthecoppermarkethecontrolled,issentencedtoprisonforforgeryandfraud.Thebanks’reputationisseverelydamagedSep1995:Daiwa($1.1bloss)Abondtrader,ToshihideIgushi,amassesunreportedlossesover11yearsattheU.S.subsidiary.Thebankisdeclaredinsolvent.Feb1995:Barings($1.3bloss)NickLeeson,aderivativestraderamassesunreportedlossesover2years.Baringsgoesbankrupt.Oct1994:BankersTrust($150mloss)Thebankbecomesembroiledinahigh-profilelawsuitwithacustomerthataccusesitofimpropersellingpractices.Bankerssettlesbutitsreputationisbadlydamaged.ItislaterboughtoutbyDeutscheBank.CaseHistoriesofOperationalRisk9LessonsfromtheCaseHistoriesInvolvingroguetradersorinternalfrauds.Involvingamixofmarketriskandoperationalrisk(failure
tosupervise).Costs:Directcost-monetarylossesIndirectcost–
reputational
damage,liquidityproblem,insolvency,bankruptcy…10OperationalRiskOperationalRiskMostfinancialdisasterscanbeattributedtoacombinationofmarketandcreditriskalongwithsomefailureofcontrols,whichisaformofoperationalriskNocommondefinitionsforthisriskclassBaselIIforthefirsttimeestablishesDefinitionforoperationalriskLosseventtypesCapitalchargesforoperationalrisk11DefinitionforOperationalRisk“...theriskoflossresultingfrominadequateorfailedinternalprocesses,peopleandsystemsorfromexternalevents.Thedefinitionincludeslegalriskbutexcludesstrategicandreputationrisk.〞.12BaselIIDefinitionofOp-RiskRisklossresultinginadequateorfailed
internalprocess,peopleandsystemsorfromexternaleventsInclude:LegalRiskExclude:strategicandreputationrisk定义的方式causeimpact定义中引起操作风险的原因People(humanfactor)Internalprocessessystemsexternalfactors.定义中不包含的风险strategicriskandreputationalrisk定义中包含的风险legalrisk13OpRiskClassification:InternalRisks
(Source:BritishBankers’Association)InternalRisksPeopleProcessesSystemsEmployeecollusion/fraudEmployeeerrorEmployeemisdeedEmployersliabilityEmploymentlawHealthandsafetyIndustrialactionLackofknowledge/skillsLossofkeypersonnelAccountingerrorCapacityriskContractriskMisselling/suitabilityProductcomplexityProjectriskReportingerrorSettlement/paymenterrorTransactionerrorValuationerrorDataqualityProgrammingerrorsSecuritybreachStrategicrisks(platform/suppliers)SystemcapacitySystemcompatibilitySystemdeliverySystemfailureSystemsuitability14OpRiskClassification:ExternalRisks
(Source:BritishBankers’Association)ExternalRisksExternalPhysicalLegalMoneylaunderingOutsourcingPoliticalRegulatorySupplierriskTaxFireNaturaldisasterPhysicalsecurityTerroristTheft15BusinessLinesandOperationalRisk16CommercialBankingandOperationalRisk
(Source:OWC)(Source:CMRA)17MostSignificantOpRisk-APollbyRiskManagementAssociationin200318BaselIILossEventTypesandExamplesEventTypeExamplesInternalfraudEmployeetheft,intentionalmisreportingofpositions,andinsidertradingonanemployee'sownaccountExternalfraudRobbery,forgery,andcheckkitingEmploymentpracticesandworkplacesafety(就业政策与工作场所安全)Workers'compensationanddiscriminationclaims,violationofemployeehealthandsafetyrules,andgeneralliabilityClients,products,andbusinesspractices(客户,产品和业务操作)Fiduciarybreaches,misuseofconfidentialcustomerinformation,moneylaundering,andsaleofunauthorizedproductsDamagetophysicalassets(实体资产损坏)Terrorism,vandalism,earthquakes,fires,andfloodsBusinessdisruptionandsystemfailures(业务中断和系统失败)Hardwareandsoftwarefailures,telecommunicationproblems,andutilityoutagesExecution,delivery,andprocessmanagement(执行,交割和流程管理)Dataentryerrors,collateralmanagementfailures,incompletelegaldocumentation,andvendordisputes19ProcessRisks-InadequateProcessIntegrity&DurabilityExecution,Delivery&ProcessManagementBusinessDisruptionandSystemsFailureConductRisks-EthicalorLegalMisconductClients,Products&BusinessPracticesEmploymentPracticesandWorkplaceSafetyInternalTheftandFraudExternalRisks-ExternalVulnerabilitiesExternalTheftandFraudDamagetoPhysicalAssetsRe-groupingofOpRisklossevents20OperationalRiskEvents21Top-DownModelsonOpRiskAssessmentTheyattempttomeasureoperationalriskatthebroadestlevel,thatis,
firm-wideorindustry-widedata.Resultsarethenusedtodeterminetheamountof
capitalthatneedstobesetasideasabufferagainstthisrisk.Thiscapitalisallocated
tobusinessunits.22Bottom-upModelsonOpRiskAssessmentTheystartattheindividualbusinessunitorprocesslevel.Theresultsarethenaggregatedtodeterminetheriskprofileoftheinstitution.Themainbenefitofsuchapproachesisthattheyleadtoabetterunderstandingofthecausesofoperationallosses.23AssessingOperationalRiskSummaryTop-DownApproachBottom-UpApproachSophisticationSimpleComplexDatarequirementNon-intensiveIntensiveHFLSVLFHSUndifferentiatedDifferentiatedDiagnosticabilityNoYesPerspectiveBackward-lookingForward-looking24TopDownMethod1.Multi-factormodels2.Income-basedmodels3.Expense-basedmodels4.Operatingleveragemodels5.Scenarioanalysis6.Riskprofilingmodels25Multifactormodels(TD):Return-basedmodelThisapproachanalyzesthereturntimeseriesandsomemacroeconomictimeseries.Thelateronesreflectthemarketriskorcreditrisk.Forinstance,wehaveY=A+BX+εY:ReturnChangeX:RiskFactorsB:SensitivityFactors(1–R2)*V(y)canindicatethesizeofunsystematicrisk(i.e.operationalrisk)Itiseasytoestimate(publictradedfirms)CannotbeusedasdiagnostictoolUsefulinestimatingfirm’sstockpricereactiontoHFLSOReventsonly.DoesnotperformwellwhenlargescaleeventsbreakthecontinuityofequityreturnsMergerCatastrophic(LFHS)26Multifactormodels(TD):Return-basedmodelOtherrelatedmodels:Income-basedmodelThesearealsocalledEarningatRisk(EaR)models.Incomeorrevenue(asthedependentvariable)isregressedagainstcreditriskfactor(s)andmarketriskfactor(s).Theresidual,orunexplained,volatilitycomponentisdeemedtobethemeasureofoperationalrisk.Otherrelatedmodels:Expense-basedmodelOperationalriskismeasuredasfluctuationsinhistoricalexpenses.Thisistheeasiestapproachbutignoresoperationalrisksthatareunrelatedtoexpenses;further,arisk-reducinginitiativethathappenedtoincreaseexpenses(becauseitinvolvedacost)wouldbemischaracterized.27ScenarioAnalysisInthiscontext,thisisagenericlabelreferringtoanattemptto“imagine〞variousscenariosthatcontaincatastrophicshocks.Bydefinition,scenarioanalysisattemptstoanticipatelowfrequencyhighseverity(LFHS)riskevents–butdoingthisgenerallyisasubjectiveexercise.28Riskprofilingmodels
(TD):KeyRiskIndicatorsKRIaresimplemeasuresthatprovideanindicationofwhetherrisksarechangingovertime.Thesecanincludeauditscores,staffturnover,tradevolumes,andsoon.〔总量上,建立联系〕Theassumptionisthatoperationalriskeventsaremorelikelytooccurwhentheseindicatorsincrease.ThesemeasuresallowtheriskmanagertoforecastlossesthroughtheapplicationofstatisticalmodelsOtherrelatedmodelsOperationalperformanceindicators/KPIOperationalcontrolindicators/KCI29BottomUpMethodTherearethreetypesofbottom-upapproaches:
ProcessApproachTheprocessapproachattemptstoidentifyrootcausesofrisk;becauseitseekstounderstandcauseand-effect,inshouldbeabletohelpdiagnoseandpreventoperationallosses.ActuarialProprietary.30Processapproachesmodels
(BU):CausalnetworksCausalnetworksexplainlossesintermsofasequenceofrelatedvariables.Eachvariableitselfcanbeduetothecombinationofothervariables.Forinstance,settlementlossescanbeviewedascausedbyacombinationof(1)exposureand(2)timedelay.Causesandeffectsarelinkedthroughconditionalprobabilities.Simulationsarethenrunonthenetwork,generatingadistributionoflosses31Processapproachesmodels
(BU)OtherrelatedmodelsConnectivityModelConnectivitymodelsaresimilartoscorecardsbuttheyfocusoncause-and-effect.Examplesofconnectivitymodelsincludefishboneanalysisandfaulttreeanalysis.ReliabilityModelsReliabilitymodelsemphasizestatisticaltechniquesratherthanrootcauses.Theyfocusonthelikelihoodthatariskeventwilloccur.Thetypicalmetricistheeventfailurerate,whichisthetimebetweenevents.〔关注事件发生的间隔〕32ActuarialModels(BU):Parametric-basedlossdistribution
Thisapproachestimatestheobjectivedistributionoflossesfromtwokindofdistributions,lossfrequenciesandlossseverities.Thelossfrequencydistributiondescribesthenumberoflosseventsoverafixedintervaloftime.Traditionalparamediclossfrequencydistributionsare:BinomialDistributionNegativeBinomialDistributionPoissonDistributionThelossseveritydistributiondescribesthesizeofthelossonceitoccurs.Traditionalparamediclossseveritydistributionsare:LognormalDistributionWeibullDistributionTANDistribution(mixtureofNormaldistributionandGammadistribution)33ActuarialModels(BU)OtherrelatedmodelsHistorical-basedlossdistributionInternalandexternaldataonoperationallossesareplottedinahistograminordertodrawtheempiricallossdistribution.Basically,itisassumedthatthehistoricaldistributionwillapplygoingforward.Assuch,nospecificationormodelisrequired(i.e.,MonteCarlosimulationcanfillinthegaps).ExtremeValueTheoryThisapproachisnotmutuallyexclusivetotheempiricalandparametricapproaches.EVTconductsadditionalanalysesontheextremetailoftheoperationallossdistribution.ForLFHSevents,acommondistributionistheGeneralizedParetoDistribution(GPD).Extremevaluetheory(EVT)impliestheuseofadistributionthathasfat-tails(leptokurtosisorkurtosis>3)relativetothenormaldistribution.34FrequencyandLossTable35ConvolutionNumberoflossesFirstLossSecondLossTotalLossProbability011122222222201000100001000001000100010001000010000100001000001000001000000000100010000100000100010000100000100010000100000010001000010000020001100010100011000200001100001010001100002000000.60.150.090.060.0250.0150.0100.0150.0090.0060.0100.0060.004Expectation1175036OperationalLossDistributionExpectedLoss=averagelossUnexpectedLoss=WorstCaseLoss–ExpectedLoss37OperationalLossDistribution$100,000withaprobabilityof96.4%.VaRat96.4%=100000-11750=$88,25038ProprietaryOperationalRiskModelsProprietaryOperationalRiskModelsProprietarymodelsinclude,forexample,OpVarofferedbyOpVantage.Aproprietarymodelvendorhastheirowndatabaseofeventlossesthatcanbeusedtohelpfitdistributions.39OperationalRiskManagementEightKeyPrinciplesrelevanttobanksforORMframeworkDefinitionandApprovalInternalauditscrutiny〔详细审查〕FormulationandimplementationAssessmentandidentificationMonitoringandreportingControlandreviewpoliciesContingencystrategiesPublicdisclosure40OperationalRiskManagementIntegratedtheEightKeyPrinciplesinaFirm-wideframeworkDefiningmanagerialresponsibilitiesIdentifyingdependenciesacrossunitsDevelopingpreventioncontrolsExamininginternallossdataandexternaleventsPeriodicallyreviewingandupdatingtheopriskplan41MethodsforHedgingOperationalRiskInsuranceSelf-InsurancecashreservesReservesofliquidassetsContingentcreditlineRiskpreventionandcontrolOff-shoreinsurancesubsidiary〔CaptiveInsurers〕DerivativesCatoptions—spreadoption(underwritingderivatives,Weatherderivatives)Catbonds(Indemnifiednotes〔减免〕,Indexednotes,Parametricnotes)42InsuranceWhy?(transferORtoInsuranceCompany,especiallyLFHS)ProblemofmoralhazardleadtoDeductibleCo-insurancefeaturesPrimarydisadvantage:thelimitationofpolicycoverage.10-30%ofpossibleOL.Largepotentiallossesmaybeuninsurable.Ambiguityinthedegreeofcoverage—delaysinsettingclaims.Insuranceistypicallyexpensive-beusedjudiciouslytotargetrisktowhichthefirmismostvulnerable.(HigherthanEL)Thenhowaboutself-Insurance?43Self-insuranceWhy?reducethecostofinsurancecoveragetomanageriskinternallyCapitalprovisionheldascushionagainstoperationallosses.Setasideaportfolioofliquidassets,suchasmarketablesecurities.Establishalineofcredit—makesfinancingavailablecontingentontheoccurrenceoflargeoperational.RiskpreventionandcontrolInvestresourcestoconstructriskmitigationtechniquesIntheform(riskidentification,externalvalidation,riskmonitoring,incentivetopromoteactivities,riskreportingrequirements,ControlOR)Captiveinsurerwhollyownedinsurancesubsidiaryallowthefirmtoobtainthepreferentialtaxtreatmentaccordedtoinsurancecompany.44HowtoChoose?ThreeMethodsSub-methodComments/characteristicEmpiricalResults(Lossestohedge)>USD100MUSD51~100MUSD11~50M<USD10MSelfInsurancecashreservesheldascushionagainstoperationallossesAppliedAppliedAppliedReservesofliquidassetsContingentcreditlinecredit—makesexternalfinancingavailableRiskpreventionandcontrolInvestresourcestoconstructriskmitigationtechniquesCaptiveinsurerallowthefirmtoobtainthepreferentialtaxtreatmentAppliedApplied45MethodsforHedgingOperationalRiskThreeMethodsSub-methodComments/characteristicEmpiricalResults(Lossestohedge)>USD100MUSD51~100MUSD11~50M<USD10MInsuranceProblemofmoralhazardleadtoDeductibleandCo-insurancefeaturesAppliedAppliedAppliedDerivativesCatoptionsOfferinsuranceeffect/notwell-developedEmpiricalResultsNotavailable46OutlineOperationalRiskWarmUp:WhyOperationalRisk?DefinitionofOperationalRiskMeasurementofOperationalRiskManagementofOperationalRiskOtherRisksrelatedtoOperationalRiskTechnologyRiskDaylightOverdraftRiskModelRisk47RelationshipBetweenTechnologicalImprovements,OperationalRiskandProfitabilityTechnologycandirectlyimproveprofitabilityInterestincomeincreaseInterestExpensereduceOtherincomeincrease〔新产品〕Noninterestexpensesreduce〔人力资源效率提升〕TechnologyenhancementcanincreaseoperationalriskFuturerevenueswon’tcoverdevelopmentcostsexcesscapacityproblemintegrationproblemcostoverrunproblemscostcontrolproblems48EconomiesofScale规模经济规模经济在产业经济学中又叫规模利益,是指伴随着企业生产能力的扩大而出现的生产批量扩大,以及由此而带来单位制成品生产本钱的下降和企业盈利的递增现象〔Theeconomyofscaleadvantageisadeclineintheaveragecostofproducingaserviceasthefinancialinstitutiongrows.〕Averagecostofproduction:ACiaveragecostofithfinancialinstitution,TCiTotalcostofithfinancialinstitutionSirepresentssizeofthefinancialinstitutionsmeasuredbyassets,depositsandloansThreeshapesofDiseconomiesofScale49EconomiesofScope50TechnologicalRiskSomeempiricalresultsEconomicsofscale(Asset$10-25billion)existforlargeregionalandsuper-regionalbankEconomicsofscopeexistevidenceisweakamongbank.NoevidenceofEconomicsofscale/scopeinnonbankfinancialserviceNostrongevidencethatbiggerisbetter.Economicsofscopeandscaledon’texplaincostdifferencesamongthesamesizefirms.RelativelylowpayofffromtechinnovationlargeFIgainefficiencybygeneratingrevenueratherthanreducingcosts.X无效率?51DaylightoverdraftriskFedwire通过FedWire的资金清算是双向的,即联邦储藏银行借记寄出方账户,并以相同信息贷记接收方账户。FedWire允许白天透支。在转账时,如果寄出方在联邦储藏账户中的资金缺乏,无法在其账户中对可用资金进行借记,即寄出方不能立即和联邦储藏银行清算其资金余额,此时,FedWire那么向其发出一笔贷款,并仍然贷记接收方储藏账户。因此,不管寄出方能否同联邦储藏银行清算其资金余额,对接收方来说,支付总是最终的。52DaylightoverdraftriskWiretransfersysteminUSCHIPS(ClearingHouseInterbankPaymentSystem):纽约清算所银行同业支付系统国际贸易资金清算的桥梁欧洲美元供给者进行交易的通道Purenetsettlementsystem,日初头寸0Allintradaytransfersareconsideredprovisionaluntilsettlementoccursattheendoftheday.层层代理的清算体制:非参加银行可由参加银行代理清算,参加银行又由会员银行代理清算53DaylightoverdraftriskCHIPS流程中央计算机系统对各参加银行当日(ValueDate)的每笔交易进行统计,统计出各参加银行应借或应贷的净金额。中央计算机系统给各参加银行传送当日交易的摘要报告当日下午4:30后,CHIPS关闭,通过FedWire网,将各参加银行应借或应贷的净金额通知纽约区联邦储藏银行。纽约区联邦储藏银行利用其会员银行的存款准备金账户完成清算。清算完成后,通知CHIPS,CHIPS那么于下午5:30~6:30,用1小时的时间轧平账务。54DaylightoverdraftriskWhatisdaylightoverdraft?daylightoverdraft,daylightcredit,daylightexposure,intradaycredit日间透支,日间信用,日间风险,日内信用BKhavenegativeintradaybalancesonFed准备金一个营业日以内的信用;在日终结算的信用转帐系统中,假定接收了支付指令的机构接收了支付指令并且即使这家机构在营业日结算前不能收到最终资金也按指令的要求行动的话,它就在实事上心照不宣地提供了日间信贷。画图55Daylightoverdraftrisk结果:专家认为是银行系统的最大风险BONY1985—Afailurecouldbedestabilizingtothe金融市场Bony(政府债券的主要交易商)1985/11/20软件系统崩溃日间风险上升21号晚上修复Fed提供了一天的贷款,相当于其总资产的2/3.56ModelRiskDefinemodelriskandidentifysourcesofmodelrisk.Modelriskistheriskassociatedwithusingfinancialmodelstosimulatecomplexrelationships.Itmayarisefromincorrectmodelapplication,implementationrisk,calibrationerrors,programmingerrors,anddataproblems.57Rebonato’sdefinitionofmodelrisk:Modelriskistheriskofoccurrenceofasignificantdifferencebetweenthemark-to-modelvalueofacomplexand/orilliquidinstrument,andthepriceatwhichthesameinstrumentisrevealedtohavetradedinthemarket.ModelRisk58Thereareseveralpointsworthnoticingaboutthedefinition.Firstofall,fromthedefinitionitfollowsthat,ifreliablepricesforallinstrumentswereobservableatalltimes,modelriskwouldnotexist.Anotherimportantobservationisthattheinstrumentinquestionmay,butneednot,becomplexorheldoff-balancesheet:modelriskhasoftenbeenassociatedwithcomplexderivativesproducts,butadeeplyout-of-themoneycall(theplain-vanillaoptionparexcellence)andanilliquidcorporatebond(aprototypicalon-balance-sheetinstrument)canbothpresentsubstantialmodelrisk.Whatboththeseinstrumentshaveincommonisthatthevalueatwhichtheywouldtradeinthemarketcannotbereadilyascertainedviascreen
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 心电图操作与诊断
- 婚庆材料供应协议
- 阿克苏职业技术学院《临床医学概论二》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 陇东学院《社科信息检索与利用》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 陕西学前师范学院《法医病理学》2023-2024学年第二学期期末试卷
- 陕西工商职业学院《英语视听四》2023-2024学年第二学期期末试卷
- 陕西旅游烹饪职业学院《病原生物学与医学免疫学》2023-2024学年第一学期期末试卷
- 陕西省合阳县2024-2025学年初三下第三次考试物理试题含解析
- 陕西省汉中学市南郑县市级名校2025届初三第一次质量调研普查考试化学试题含解析
- 手术室护士成长管理
- 2024年中国邮政集团有限公司校园招聘考试试题参考答案
- DZ∕T 0399-2022 矿山资源储量管理规范(正式版)
- 华为灰度管理法
- 2024年黑龙江省哈尔滨市中考二模化学试题
- 2024糖尿病酮症酸中毒诊断和治疗课件
- 颈后路手术护理查房
- 《采购渠道选择》课件
- 汽车消费调查问卷
- 《车用动力电池回收利用单体拆解技术规范》
- 艰难梭菌感染的流行病学调查
- 《手术体位摆放》课件
评论
0/150
提交评论