专题07- 阅读理解议论文 (原卷版) 五年(2018-2022)北京高考真英语真题+两年模拟题分项汇编详解_第1页
专题07- 阅读理解议论文 (原卷版) 五年(2018-2022)北京高考真英语真题+两年模拟题分项汇编详解_第2页
专题07- 阅读理解议论文 (原卷版) 五年(2018-2022)北京高考真英语真题+两年模拟题分项汇编详解_第3页
专题07- 阅读理解议论文 (原卷版) 五年(2018-2022)北京高考真英语真题+两年模拟题分项汇编详解_第4页
专题07- 阅读理解议论文 (原卷版) 五年(2018-2022)北京高考真英语真题+两年模拟题分项汇编详解_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩19页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

专题07阅读理解议论文序号内容PartIPassage1-Passage5--5年真题过关PartIIPassage6-Passage16--模拟能力提升(北京各区模拟试题)PartI-5年真题过关Passage1(2022年北京)Quantum(量子)computershavebeenonmymindalotlately.Afriendhasbeensendingmearticlesonhowquantumcomputersmighthelpsolvesomeofthebiggestchallengeswefaceashumans.I’vealsohadexchangeswithtwoquantum-computingexperts.OneiscomputerscientistChrisJohnsonwhoIseeassomeonewhohelpskeepthefieldhonest.TheotherisphysicistPhilipTaylor.Fordecades,quantumcomputinghasbeenlittlemorethanalaboratorycuriosity.Now,bigtechcompanieshaveinvestedinquantumcomputing,ashavemanysmallerones.AccordingtoBusinessWeekly,quantummachinescouldhelpus“curecancer,andeventakestepstoturnclimatechangeintheoppositedirection.”Thisisthesortofhype(炒作)thatannoysJohnson.Heworriesthatresearchersaremakingpromisestheycan’tkeep.“What’snew,”Johnsonwrote,“isthatmillionsofdollarsarenowpotentiallyavailabletoquantumcomputingresearchers.”Asquantumcomputingattractsmoreattentionandfunding,researchersmaymisleadinvestors,journalists,thepublicand,worstofall,themselvesabouttheirwork’spotential.Ifresearcherscan’tkeeptheirpromises,excitementmightgivewaytodoubt,disappointmentandanger,Johnsonwarns.Lotsofothertechnologieshavegonethroughstagesofexcitement.Butsomethingaboutquantumcomputingmakesitespeciallypronetohype,Johnsonsuggests,perhapsbecause“‘quantum’standsforsomethingcoolyoushouldn’tbeabletounderstand.”AndthatbringsmebacktoTaylor,whosuggestedthatIreadhisbookQforQuantum.AfterIreadthebook,Taylorpatientlyansweredmyquestionsaboutit.HealsoansweredmyquestionsaboutPyQuantum,thefirmheco-foundedin2016.TaylorsharesJohnson’sconcernsabouthype,buthesaysthoseconcernsdonotapplytoPyQuantum.Thecompany,hesays,iscloserthananyotherfirm“byaverylargemargin(幅度)”tobuildinga“useful”quantumcomputer,onethat“solvesanimpactfulproblemthatwewouldnothavebeenabletosolveotherwise.”Headds,“Peoplewillnaturallydiscountmyopinions,butIhavespentalotoftimequantitativelycomparingwhatwearedoingwithothers.”CouldPyQuantumreallybeleadingallthecompetition“byawidemargin”,asTaylorclaims?Idon’tknow.I’mcertainlynotgoingtoadvisemyfriendoranyoneelsetoinvestinquantumcomputers.ButItrustTaylor,justasItrustJohnson.31.RegardingJohnson’sconcerns,theauthorfeels________.A.sympathetic B.unconcerned C.doubtful D.excited32.WhatleadstoTaylor’soptimismaboutquantumcomputing?A.Hisdominanceinphysics. B.Thecompetitioninthefield.C.HisconfidenceinPyQuantum. D.Theinvestmentoftechcompanies.33.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“prone”inParagraph3mostprobablymean?A.Open. B.Cool. C.Useful. D.Resistant.34.Whichwouldbethebesttitleforthepassage?A.IsJohnsonMoreCompetentThanTaylor?B.IsQuantumComputingRedefiningTechnology?C.WillQuantumComputersEverComeintoBeing?D.WillQuantumComputingEverLiveUptoItsHype?Passage2(2021年北京)Earlyfifth-centuryphilosopherSt.Augustinefamouslywrotethatheknewwhattimewasunlesssomeoneaskedhim.AlbertEinsteinaddedanotherwrinklewhenhetheorizedthattimevariesdependingonwhereyoumeasureit.Today'sstate-of-the-artatomic(原子的)clockshaveprovenEinsteinright.Evenadvancedphysicscan'tdecisivelytelluswhattimeis,becausetheanswerdependsonthequestionyou'reasking.Forgetabouttimeasanabsolute.Whatif,insteadofconsideringtimeintermsofastronomy,werelatedtimetoecology?Whatifweallowedenvironmentalconditionstosetthetempo(节奏)ofhumanlife?We'reincreasinglyawareofthefactthatwecan'tcontrolEarthsystemswithengineeringalone,andrealizingthatweneedtomoderate(调节)ouractionsifwehopetoliveinbalance.Whatifourdefinitionoftimereflectedthat?Recently,Iconceptualizedanewapproachtotimekeepingthat'sconnectedtocircumstancesonourplanet,conditionsthatmightchangeasaresultofglobalwarming.We'renowbuildingaclockattheAnchorageMuseumthatreflectsthetotalflowofseveralmajorAlaskanrivers,whicharesensitivetolocalandglobalenvironmentalchanges.We'veprogrammedittomatchanatomicclockifthewaterwayscontinuetoflowattheirpresentrate.Iftheriversrunfasterinthefutureonaverage,theclockwillgetaheadofstandardtime.Iftheyrunslower,you'llseetheoppositeeffect.Theclockregistersbothshort-termirregularitiesandlong-termtrendsinriverdynamics.It'sasortofobservatorythatrevealshowtheriversarebehavingfromtheirowntemporalframe(时间框架),andallowsustowitnessthosechangesonoursmartwatchesorphones.AnyonewhooptstogoonAlaskaMeanRiverTimewillliveinharmonywiththeplanet.Anyonewhoconsidersrivertimeinrelationtoatomictimewillencounteramajorimbalanceandmaybemotivatedtocounteractitbyconsuminglessfuelorsupportinggreenerpolicies.Evenifthismethodoftimekeepingisnovelinitsparticulars,earlyagriculturalsocietiesalsoconnectedtimetonaturalphenomena.Inpre-ClassicalGreece,forinstance,people“corrected”officialcalendarsbyshiftingdatesforwardorbackwardtoreflectthechangeofseason.Temporalconnectiontotheenvironmentwasvitaltotheirsurvival.Likewise,rivertimeandothertimekeepingsystemswe'redevelopingmayencourageenvironmentalawareness.WhenSt.Augustineadmittedhisinabilitytodefinetime,hehighlightedoneoftime'smostnoticeablequalities:Timebecomesmeaningfulonlyinadefinedcontext.Anytimekeepingsystemisvalid,andeachisaspraiseworthyasitspurpose.31WhatisthemainideaofParagraph1?A.Timekeepingisincreasinglyrelatedtonature.B.Everyonecandefinetimeontheirownterms.C.Thequalitiesoftimevarywithhowyoumeasureit.D.Timeisamajorconcernofphilosophersandscientists.32.TheauthorraisesthreequestionsinParagraph2mainlyto________.A.presentanassumption B.evaluateanargumentC.highlightanexperiment D.introduceanapproach33.Whatcanwelearnfromthispassage?A.Thosewhodonotgoonrivertimewillliveanimbalancedlife.B.NewwaysofmeasuringtimecanhelptocontrolEarthsystems.C.Atomictimewillgetaheadofrivertimeiftheriversrunslower.D.Moderntechnologymayhelptoshapetherivers’temporalframe.34.Whatcanweinferfromthispassage?A.Itiscrucialtoimprovethedefinitionoftime.B.Afixedframewillmaketimemeaningless.C.Weshouldliveinharmonywithnature.D.Historyisamirrorreflectingreality.Passage3(2020年北京)CertainformsofAIareindeedbecomingubiquitous.Forexample,algorithms(算法)carryouthugevolumesoftradingonourfinancialmarkets,self-drivingcarsareappearingoncitystreets,andoursmartphonesaretranslatingfromonelanguageintoanother.Thesesystemsaresometimesfasterandmoreperceptivethanwehumansare.Butsofarthatisonlytrueforthespecifictasksforwhichthesystemshavebeendesigned.ThatissomethingthatsomeAIdevelopersarenoweagertochange.Someoftoday’sAIpioneerswanttomoveonfromtoday’sworldof“weak”or“narrow”AI,tocreate“strong”or“full”AI,orwhatisoftencalledartificialgeneralintelligence(AGI).Insomerespects,today’spowerfulcomputingmachinesalreadymakeourbrainslookweak.AGIcould,itsadvocatessay,workforusaroundtheclock,anddrawingonallavailabledata,couldsuggestsolutionstomanyproblems.DM,acompanyfocusedonthedevelopmentofAGI,hasanambitionto“solveintelligence”.“Ifwe’resuccessful,”theirmissionstatementreads,“webelievethiswillbeoneofthemostimportantandwidelybeneficialscientificadvancesevermade.”SincetheearlydaysofAI,imaginationhasoutpacedwhatispossibleorevenprobable.In1965,animaginativemathematiciancalledIrvingGoodpredictedtheeventualcreationofan“ultra-intelligentmachine…thatcanfarsurpassalltheintellectual(智力的)activitiesofanyman,howeverclever.”Goodwentontosuggestthat“thefirstultra-intelligentmachine”couldbe“thelastinventionthatmanneedevermake.”Fearsabouttheappearanceofbad,powerful,man-madeintelligentmachineshavebeenreinforced(强化)bymanyworksoffiction—MaryShelley’sFrankensteinandtheTerminatorfilmseries,forexample.ButifAIdoeseventuallyprovetobeourdownfall,itisunlikelytobeatthehandsofhuman-shapedformslikethese,withrecognisablyhumanmotivationssuchasaggression(敌对行为).Instead,IagreewithOxfordUniversityphilosopherNickBostrom,whobelievesthattheheaviestrisksfromAGIdonotcomefromadecisiontoturnagainstmankindbutratherfromadoggedpursuitofsetobjectivesattheexpenseofeverythingelse.ThepromiseanddangeroftrueAGIaregreat.Butalloftoday’sexciteddiscussionaboutthesepossibilitiespresupposesthefactthatwewillbeabletobuildthesesystems.And,havingspokentomanyoftheworld’sforemostAIresearchers,IbelievethereisgoodreasontodoubtthatwewillseeAGIanytimesoon,ifever.42.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“ubiquitous”inParagraphIprobablymean?A.Enormousinquantity. B.Changeabledaily.C.Stableinquality. D.Presenteverywhere.43.WhatcouldAGIdoforus,accordingtoitssupporters?A.Helptotackleproblems. B.Makebrainsmoreactive.C.Benefitambitiouspeople. D.Setuppowerfuldatabases.44.AsforIrvingGood’sopiniononultra-intelligentmachinestheauthoris____________.A.supportive B.disapprovingC.fearful D.uncertain45.WhatcanbeinferredaboutAGIfromthepassage?A.Itmaybeonlyadream.B.Itwillcomeintobeingsoon.C.Itwillbecontrolledbyhumans.D.Itmaybemoredangerousthanever.Passage5(2018年北京)PreparingCitiesforRobotCarsThepossibilityofself-drivingrobotcarshasoftenseemedlikeafuturist’sdream,yearsawayfrommaterializingintherealworld.Well,thefutureisapparentlynow.TheCaliforniaDepartmentofMotorVehiclesbegangivingpermitsinAprilforcompaniestotesttrulyself-drivingcarsonpublicroads.Thestatealsoclearedthewayforcompaniestosellorrentoutself-drivingcars,andforcompaniestooperatedriverlesstaxiservices.California,itshouldbenoted,isn’tleadingthewayhere.Companieshavebeentestingtheirvehiclesincitiesacrossthecountry.It’shardtopredictwhendriverlesscarswillbeeverywhereonourroads.Buthoweverlongittakes,thetechnologyhasthepotentialtochangeourtransportationsystemsandourcities,forbetterorforworse,dependingonhowthetransformationisregulated.Whilemuchofthedebatesofarhasbeenfocusedonthesafetyofdriverlesscars(andrightfullyso),policymakersalsoshouldbetalkingabouthowself-drivingvehiclescanhelpreducetrafficjams,cutemissions(排放)andoffermoreconvenient,affordablemobilityoptions.Thearrivalofdriverlessvehiclesisachancetomakesurethatthosevehiclesareenvironmentallyfriendlyandmoreshared.Dowewanttocopy—orevenworsen—thetrafficoftodaywithdriverlesscars?Imagineafuturewheremostadultsownindividualself-drivingvehicles.Theytoleratelong,slowjourneystoandfromworkonpackedhighwaysbecausetheycanwork,entertainthemselvesorsleepontheride,whichencouragesurbanspread.Theytaketheirdriverlesscartoanappointmentandsettheemptyvehicletocirclethebuildingtoavoidpayingforparking.Insteadofwalkingafewblockstopickupachildorthedrycleaning,theysendtheself-drivingminibus.Theconvenienceevenleadsfewerpeopletotakepublictransport—anunwelcomesideeffectresearchershavealreadyfoundinride-hailing(叫车)services.AstudyfromtheUniversityofCaliforniaatDavissuggestedthatreplacingpetrol-poweredprivatecarsworldwidewithelectric,self-drivingandsharedsystemscouldreducecarbonemissionsfromtransportation80%andcutthecostoftransportationinfrastructure(基础设施)andoperations40%by2050.Feweremissionsandcheapertravelsoundprettyappealing.Thefirstcommerciallyavailabledriverlesscarswillalmostcertainlybefieldedbyride-hailingservices,consideringthecostofself-drivingtechnologyaswellasliabilityandmaintenanceissues(责任与维护问题).Butdriverlesscarownershipcouldincreaseasthepricesdropandmorepeoplebecomecomfortablewiththetechnology.zxxkPolicymakersshouldstartthinkingnowabouthowtomakesuretheappearanceofdriverlessvehiclesdoesn’textendtheworstaspectsofthecar-controlledtransportationsystemwehavetoday.Thecomingtechnologicaladvancementpresentsachanceforcitiesandstatestodeveloptransportationsystemsdesignedtomovemorepeople,andmoreaffordably.Thecarofthefutureiscoming.Wejusthavetoplanforit.47.Accordingtotheauthor,attentionshouldbepaidtohowdriverlesscarscan__________.A.helpdealwithtransportation-relatedproblemsB.providebetterservicestocustomersC.causedamagetoourenvironmentD.makesomepeoplelosejobs48.Asfordriverlesscars,whatistheauthor’smajorconcern?A.Safety.B.Sideeffects.C.Affordability.D.Management.49.Whatdoestheunderlinedword"fielded"inParagraph4probablymean?A.Employed.B.Replaced.C.Shared.D.Reduced.50.Whatistheauthor’sattitudetothefutureofself-drivingcars?A.Doubtful.B.Positive.C.Disapproving.D.Sympathetic.PartII-模拟能力提升(北京各区模拟试题)Passage6(2022·北京·人大附中三模)Blindimitationisself-destruction.Tothosewhodonotrecognizetheiruniqueworth,imitationappearsattractive;tothosewhoknowtheirstrength,imitationisunacceptable.Intheearlystagesofskillorcharacterdevelopment,imitationishelpful.WhenIfirstlearnedtocook,Iusedrecipesandturnedoutsometastydishes.ButsoonIgrewbored.Whyfollowsomeoneelse’swayofcookingwhenIcouldcreatemyown?Imitatingrolemodelsislikeusingtrainingwheelsonachild’sbicycle;theyhelpyougetgoing,butonceyoufindyourownbalance,youflyfasterandfartherwithoutrelyingonthem.Indailylife,imitationcanhurtusifwesubconsciously(下意识地)holdpoorrolemodels.If,asachild,youobservedpeoplewhoseliveswerebad,youmayhaveacceptedtheirfearandpainasnormalandgoneontofollowwhattheydid.Ifyoudonotmakestrongchoicesforyourself,youwillgettheresultsoftheweakchoicesofothers.Inthefieldofentertainment,ourcultureglorifiescelebrities.Thosestarslookgreatonscreen.Butwhentheystepoffscreen,theirpersonallivesmaybedisastrous.Ifyouaregoingtofollowsomeone,focusontheirtalent,nottheirbadcharacterorunacceptablebehaviors.Blessedisthepersonwillingtoactontheirsuddendesiretocreatesomethingunique.Thinkofthemovies,books,teachers,andfriendsthathaveaffectedyoumostdeeply.Theytouchedyoubecausetheircreationsweremotivatedbyinspiration,notdesperation.Theworldischangednotbythosewhodowhathasbeendonebeforethem,butbythosewhodowhathasbeendoneinsidethem.Creativepeoplehaveanendlessresourceofideas.Theproblemacreatorfacesisnotrunningoutofmaterial;itiswhattodowiththematerialknockingatthedoorofimagination.Studyyourrolemodels,acceptthegiftstheyhavegiven,andleavebehindwhatdoesnotserve.Thenyoucansay,“Istandontheshouldersofmyancestors’tragediesanddeclarevictory,andknowthattheyarecheeringon.”1.Imitationprovesusefulwhenyou________.A.knowyouareuniqueB.losethebalanceoflifeC.begintolearnsomethingnewD.gettiredofroutinepractice2.Accordingtotheauthor,theworldmovesonbecauseofthosewhoare________.A.desperatetoinfluenceotherswiththeirknowledgeB.readytoturntheiroriginalideasintorealityC.eagertodiscoverwhattheirancestorsdidD.willingtoacceptothers’ideas3.Thetroubleacreatorfacesis________.A.thelackofstrongmotivationB.theabsenceofpracticalideasC.howtosearchformorematerialsD.howtouseimaginationcreatively4.Whatistheauthor’spurposeinwritingthispassage?A.Tohighlighttheimportanceofcreativity.B.Tocriticizethecharactersofrolemodels.C.Tocompareimitationwithcreation.D.Toexplainthemeaningofsuccess.Passage7(2022·北京东城·模拟预测)Itisageneralbeliefamongacademicsthatthehumanitiesareincrisis.AccordingtoHarvardhistorianJamesHankins,partoftheproblemisthedominanceof“critical”readingover“primary”reading.Primaryreadingtakesatextatfacevalueandsimplytriestounderstandwhattheauthorintendedtosay.Criticalreadingassumesanauthor’sstatementscanneverbetakenatfacevalue.Instead,theymustbe“seenthrough”toexposethetext’srealmeaning,whichisdeterminedinaccordwiththisorthatfashionabletheory.Mr.Hankinssaysprimaryreading“mustberecovered”forhighereducationinthehumanitiestobeeffective.Iwouldgofurther.Primaryreadingisn’timportantonlyforthehumanities,orevenforeducationmoregenerally.Therestorationofprimaryreadingcouldbeacrucialweaponinfightingthe“idletalk”thattroublesAmericansociety.IdletalkwasphilosopherMartinHeidegger’stermforinauthenticdiscourse(不可信的言辞).Itinvolvesadoptingandcirculatingothers’opinionsaboutsomethingwithouteverpersonallyengagingthatthingforyourself.Peopleengagedinidletalkspeakinaccordwithexpectationsfortheirparticularidentityorrole.Theyholdandexpresstheopinionsapersonintheirroleisexpectedtohold.Idletalkcanbeharmless.EachyearmymotherformsstrongopinionsaboutwhichfilmsshouldwinAcademyAwardswithoutseeinganyofthem,afterreadingarticlesbycriticsshefavors.Butidletalkcanalsobedangerous.Considerjournalism.Thenormnowadaysisforonereportertobreakastory,followedbydozensorhundredsofjournalistsrecyclingthatcontent.Theymayaddalittlespinoftheirownbutrarelylookintotheissueforthemselves—evenwhenthiswouldrequirebutafewclicksandacoupleofminutestoreadalegislative(法律的)text.Somejournalistsevenjustsearchsocialmediaforthestoryofthedayandrewriteitintheirownwords.TheCovidpandemichighlightedtheproblem,fromexclusionofthosedaringtodiscussthetradeoffsoflockdownstothepromotionofmasksasapoliticalidentitymarkercompletelydisconnectedfrommedicalorscientificjustification.Nottomentionthemisleadingstatementthataroseover“thescience”andthesocialtrendto“follow”it.Socialmediahascontributedtothespreadofidletalk.Authenticdiscourserequirestime,effortandgood-faithengagement,butsocialmediatendstoencouragetheopposite.Asjournalistscommentoneverytopic,howeversmallortraditionallyunnewsworthy,theall-knowingchorusofglobalgossipbecomesaroaringcrowd.Socialmediaraisesthisvoice,pushingitintouserfeeds24/7.Wehearabouteverything,andwecan’thearaboutanythingwithoutalsobeingtoldwhatopinionweshouldhaveaboutit.Opinionsbeforefacts;knowwhattothinkaboutsomethingbeforeactuallylookingintoitforyourself.Andreally,whyevenbotherwiththat?Primaryreadingisn’tonlysomethingthehumanitiesneed.Ourentirecultureneedsitsvaluetoberecognizedandrestored.5.Whatdoweknowfromthefirsttwoparagraphs?A.Primaryreadingfocusesonthedeepmeaning.B.Criticalreadingleadstothecrisisinhumanities.C.Criticalreadingisgenerallypreferrednowadays.D.Primaryreadingoncedominatedhighereducation.6.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“spin”inparagraph4probablymean?A.Practice. B.Priority. C.Investigation. D.Interpretation.7.Whatdoestheauthorthinkofidletalk?A.Itbroadenspeople’sunderstanding.B.Itaffectsindependentthinkingability.C.Itshakespeople’strustinnewsreport.D.Itpromotestheadvanceofsocialmedia.8.Whatmessagedoestheauthorconvey?A.Readersshouldstayawayfromidletalk.B.Readersshouldreadoriginaltextscarefully.C.Readersshouldlimittheimpactofsocialmedia.D.Readersshouldtakeabalancedviewonreading.Passage8(2022·北京师大附中三模)Humansarefascinatedbythesourceoftheirfailingsandvirtues.Thispreoccupationinevitablyleadstoanolddebate:whethernatureornurture(养育)shapesusmore.Arevolutioningeneticshaspoisedthisasamodernpoliticalquestionaboutthecharacterofoursociety:ifpersonalitiesarehard-wiredintoourgenes,whatcangovernmentsdotohelpus?Itfeelsmorallyquestionable,yetclaimsofgeneticselectionbyintelligencearemakingheadlines.Thisisdownto“hereditarian(遗传论的)”scienceandarecentpaperclaimed“differencesinexamperformancebetweenpupilsattendingextraordinaryandordinaryschoolsmirrorthegeneticdifferencesbetweenthem”.Withsuchanassertion,theworkwaspredictablygreetedbyalotofabsurdclaimsabout“geneticsdeterminingacademicsuccess”.Whattheresearchrevealedwastheratherlesssurprisingresult:theeducationalbenefitsofextraordinaryschoolslargelydisappearoncepupils’inbornabilityandsocio-economicbackgroundweretakenintoaccount.Thatistosay,there’snothingtosupportstronglyeitherahereditaryorenvironmentalargument.Yetthepaperdoessaychildrenare“unintentionallygeneticallyselected”bytheschoolsystem.Centraltohereditarianscienceisatallclaim:thatidentifiablevariationsingeneticsequencescanpredictanindividual’sabilitytolearn,reasonandsolveproblems.Thisisproblematiconmanylevels.Ateachercouldnotseriouslytellaparenttheirchildhasalowgenetictendencytostudywhenexternalfactorsclearlyexist.Unlike-mindedacademicssaytheinheritabilityofhumantraitsisscientificallyunsound.AtbestthereisaweakstatisticalassociationandnotacausallinkbetweenDNAandintelligence.Yetsophisticatedstatisticsareusedtocreateafrighteningatmosphereofscientificcertainty.Whilethere’sanundoubtedgeneticbasistoindividualdifference,itiswrongtothinkthatsociallydefinedgroupscanbegeneticallyaccountedfor.Thefixationongenesasdestinyissurelyfalsetoo.MedicalpredictabilitycanrarelybebasedonDNAalone;theenvironmentmatterstoo.Somethingascomplexasintellectislikelytobeaffectedbymanyfactorsbeyondgenes.Ifhereditarianswanttoadvancetheircauseitwillrequiremorebalancedinterpretationandnotjustactsofadvocacy.Geneticselectionisawayofexertinginfluenceoverothers,“theultimatecollectivecontrolofhumandestinies,”aswriterH.G.Wellsputit.Knowledgebecomespowerandpowerrequiresasenseofresponsibility.Inunderstandingcognitive(认知的)ability,wemustnotelevatediscriminationtoascience:allowingpeopletoclimbtheladderoflifeonlyasfarastheircellsmightsuggest.Thiswillneedamoreskepticaleyeonthescience.Astechnologyprogresses,weallhaveadutytomakesurethatweshapeafuturethatwewouldwanttofindourselvesin.9.Whatdidarecentresearchpaperclaim?A.Thetypeofschoolstudentsattendmakesadifferencetotheirfuture.B.Geneticdifferencesbetweenstudentsarefargreaterthansupposed.C.Students’academicperformanceissomewhatdeterminedbytheirgenes.D.Theadvantagesofextraordinaryschoolsaretooobvioustoignore.10.WhatdoestheauthorsayabouttherelationshipbetweenDNAandintelligence?A.Itisoneofscientificcertainty. B.Itisnotoneofcauseandeffect.C.Itissubjecttointerpretationofstatistics. D.Itisnotfullyexaminedbygenescientists.11.Whatdohereditariansneedtodotomaketheirclaimsconvincing?A.Takeallrelevantfactorsintoaccountininterpretingtheirdata.B.Conducttheirresearchusingmoresophisticatedtechnology.C.Gathergenedatafrompeopleofallsocialclasses.D.Cooperatewithsocialscientistsintheirresearch.12.Whatdoestheauthorwarnagainstinthepassage?A.Losingsightofprofessionalethicsinconductingresearch.B.Misunderstandingthefindingsofhumancognitionresearch.C.Promotingdiscriminationinthenameofscience.D.Exaggeratingthepoweroftechnologyinshapingtheworld.Passage9(2022·北京丰台·二模)People’sdistrustinsciencehasledmanyscientiststotakeuparms(oratleastkeyboards)todefendtheirenterprise.Butintheireffortstofightbackagainstsciencedenial,somescientistssaythingsthatjustaren’ttrue-andyoucan’tbuildtrustifthethingsyouaresayingarenottrustworthy.Onepopularmoveistoinsistthatscienceisright-fullstop-andthatoncewediscoverthetruthabouttheworld,wearedone.Or,asfamousphysicistStevenSmithsaid,“Eventhoughascientifictheoryisinasenseasocialconsensus(共识),itisunlikeanyothersortofconsensusinthatitisculture-freeandpermanent.”Well,no.Evenamodestfamiliaritywiththehistoryofscienceoffersmanyexamplesofmattersthatscientiststhoughttheyhadresolved,onlytodiscoverthattheyneededtobereconsidered.Anotherpopularmoveistosayscientificfindingsaretruebecausescientistsuse“thescientificmethod.”Butwecanneveractuallyagreeonwhatthatmethodis.Somewillsayitistheobservationanddescriptionoftheworld.Otherswillsayitistheexperimentalmethod.Recentlyaprominentscientistclaimedthescientificmethodwastoavoidfoolingoneselfintothinkingsomethingistruethatisnot.Eachoftheseviewshasitsmerits,butiftheclaimisthatanyoneoftheseisthescientificmethod,thentheyallfail.Inpointoffact,themethodsofsciencehavevariedbetweendisciplinesandacrosstime.Inmyview,thebiggestmistakescientistsmakeistoclaimthatthisisallsomehowsimpleandthereforetoimplythatanyonewhodoesn’tgetitisstupid.Scienceisnotsimple,andneitheristhenaturalworld;thereinliesthechallengeofsciencecommunication.Whatwedoisbothhardand,oftenhardtoexplain.Oureffortstounderstandandcharacterizethenaturalworld

arejustthat:efforts.Becausewe’rehuman,weoftenfallflat.Thegoodnewsisthatwhenthathappens,wepickourselvesup,

brushourselvesoff,andgetbacktowork.Scientifictheoriesarenotperfectreplicasofreality,butwehavegoodreasontobelievethattheycapturesignificantelementsofit.Andexperienceremindsusthatwhenweignorereality,itsoonerorlatercomesbacktobiteus.13.Paragraph2stressesthat_________.A.scientifictheoriesmaychangewithtimeB.thefamiliaritywithscience’shisto

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论