企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第5、6章 企业社会责任;伦理决策:雇主的义务和雇员的权利_第1页
企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第5、6章 企业社会责任;伦理决策:雇主的义务和雇员的权利_第2页
企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第5、6章 企业社会责任;伦理决策:雇主的义务和雇员的权利_第3页
企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第5、6章 企业社会责任;伦理决策:雇主的义务和雇员的权利_第4页
企业伦理学(原书第5版) 课件 第5、6章 企业社会责任;伦理决策:雇主的义务和雇员的权利_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩69页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

ChapterFive:CorporateSocialResponsibilityCopyright©2021McGraw-HillEducation.Allrightsreserved.NoreproductionordistributionwithoutthepriorwrittenconsentofMcGraw-HillEducation.CorporateSocialResponsibility1Businesshastotakeaccountofitsresponsibilitiestosocietyincomingtoitsdecisions,butsocietyhastoacceptitsresponsibilitiesforsettingthestandardsagainstwhichthosedecisionsaremade. SirAdrianCadburyChapterObjectives1Afterreadingthischapter,youwillbeableto:Definecorporatesocialresponsibility.Describeandevaluatetheeconomicmodelofcorporatesocialresponsibility.Distinguishkeycomponentsofthetermresponsibility.Describeandevaluatetheeconomicmodelofcorporatesocialresponsibility.ChapterObjectives2Describeandevaluatethestakeholdermodelofcorporatesocialresponsibility.Describeandevaluatetheintegrativemodelofcorporatesocialresponsibility.ExplaintheroleofreputationmanagementasmotivationbehindCSR.EvaluatetheclaimsthatCSRis"good"forbusiness.Introduction:CorporateSocialResponsibilityThischapteraddressescorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)andhowfirmsopttomeetthisperceivedresponsibility.Businesseshaveasocialresponsibilitytoobeythelaw.Economically,businesseshaveasocialresponsibilitytoproducethegoodsandservicessocietydemands.Thereareambiguitiesinvolvedineachofthethreetermscorporate,social,andresponsibilities.TheprimaryquestionofCSRistheextenttowhichbusinessesandthemanagerswhorunthemhaveethicalresponsibilitiesbeyondproducinggoodsandserviceswithinthelaw.EthicsandSocialResponsibility1Thewordsresponsibleandresponsibilityareusedinseveraldifferentways.Onemeaningattributessomethingasacauseforaneventoraction.Inasecondsense,toberesponsibledoescarryethicalconnotations.Whenabusinessisresponsibletosomeoneorforsomething,itmeanswhatabusinessethicallyoughtorshoulddo.Productsafetyandliabilitylawsinvolvethesemeaningsofbeingresponsible.Corporatesocialresponsibilityreferstotheethicalexpectationsthatsocietyhasforbusiness.Ethicalresponsibilitiesarethosethingsthatweought,orshould,do,evenifsometimeswewouldrathernot.EthicsandSocialResponsibility2Philosophersoftendistinguishthreedifferentlevelsofethicalresponsibilitiesonascalefromlesstomoreobligatory.Ethicalresponsibilitiestodogood.Volunteering.Sponsoringacharityevent.Preventharm.GoodSamaritan.UserenewableenergyDonotcauseharmtoothers.Adutyoranobligation.Enforcedbylegalpunishment.EthicsandSocialResponsibility3Thestrongestsenseofresponsibilityisnottocauseharm.Evenwhennotexplicitlyprohibitedbylaw,ethicsdemandswenotcauseavoidableharm.Overridesbusiness’spursuitofprofit.Istherearesponsibilitytopreventharm?Amoreinclusiveunderstandingofcorporatesocialresponsibilitywouldholdthatbusinesshasaresponsibilitytopreventharm.Istherearesponsibilitytodogood?Mostwide-ranging,standardofCSRholdsthatbusinesshasasocialresponsibilitytodogoodthingsandtomakesocietyabetterplace.Philanthropyisnotsomethingthateverybusinessoughttodo.EthicsandSocialResponsibility4Therearecompetingunderstandingsofcorporatesocialresponsibilityandmanagement’sroleinfulfillingtheseresponsibilities.ThenarroweconomicmodelofCSRdirectsmanagerstomaximizeprofitandshareholderwealthwithinlegallimits.Thestakeholdermodelassetsthatneitherabusinessnortheemployeesareexemptfromordinaryethicalresponsibilities.TheintegrativemodelofCSRsaysthatpartofthemanagerialresponsibilitytoshareholdersistoservethesocialgood.Figure5.1:ModelsofCorporateSocialResponsibilityAccessthetextalternativeforslideimage.CorporateSocialResponsibility2Corporationsarepeople. MittRomneyEconomicModelofCSR1Thegeneraldefinitionofthetermcorporatesocialresponsibility(CSR)

istheethicalresponsibilitiesthatabusinesshastothesocietyinwhichitoperates.Fromaneconomicperspective,abusinessisaninstitution.Bydoingthis,thebusinessiscreatingjobsandwealththatprovidefurthersocialbenefits.Thelawcreatedaformofbusinesscalledacorporation,whichpromotestheseeconomicendsbylimitingtheliabilityofindividualsfortherisksinvolvedintheseactivities.EconomicModelofCSR2Holdsthatbusinesses’solesocialresponsibilityistofulfilltheeconomicfunctionstheyweredesignedtoserve.Managersareemployees,oragents,ofthoseownersandmustworktofurthertheowners’interests,primarilybymaximizingprofits.ManyobserversidentifythisperspectiveasthedominantmodelofCSRandrefertoitas"managerialcapitalism."Placesshareholdersatthecenterofthecorporation.Managershaveaprimaryresponsibilitytopursueprofitwithinthelaw.Corporationsareexpectedtoobeylegalmandates.EconomicModelofCSR3Businesshasnosocialresponsibilitiesbeyondtheeconomicandlegalendsforwhichitwascreated.Friedmansuggeststhatmanagersfulfilltheirethicalresponsibilitybyincreasingshareholderwealthandpursuingprofit.Thiscommonviewofcorporatesocialresponsibilityhasitsrootsintheutilitariantraditionandinneoclassicaleconomics.Withinthisdominanteconomicmodel,thereisroomtopursuesocialresponsibilities.EconomicModelofCSR4Businessisfreetocontributetosocialcausesasamatterofphilanthropy.Itbuildsgoodwilland/oragoodreputation,providestaxdeduction,andbuildsgoodwilloragoodreputationwithinthecommunity.SomesupportcausesthathavelittleornobusinessorfinancialpayoffasamatterofgivingbacktotheircommunitiesTheeconomicmodelinwhichbusinesssupportforasocialcauseisdonesimplybecauseitistherightthingtododiffersfromthereputationalversiononlyintermsoftheunderlyingmotivation.StakeholderModelofCSR1Businessesexistwithinawebofsocialandethicalrelationshipsandcreatevalueforarangeofstakeholders.NormanBowiearguesthatbusinesshasanethicaldutytorespecthumanrights.Itisthe"moralminimum"thatwecanexpectofeveryperson.Theobligationtocausenoharmoverridesotherethicalconsiderations.Ifmanagerscomplywiththemoralminimum,theyshouldmaximizeprofits.StakeholderModelofCSR2StakeholdertheoryRecognizesthateverybusinessdecisionaffectsawidevarietyofpeople,benefitingsomeandimposingcostsonothers.Thestakeholdermodelsimplyacknowledgesthisprincipleandpointsoutthatotherethicaldutieshaveanequalclaimonmanagerialdecisionmaking.AcknowledgesthisfactbyrequiringmanagementtobalancetheethicalinterestsofallaffectedpartiesLikeutilitarianism,itasksmanagerstoconsidertheconsequencesofitsdecisions.Socialresponsibilityrequiresdecisionstoprioritizecompetingandconflictingresponsibilities.Becausestakeholdertheoryrecognizesthatsomestakeholdershavedifferentpowerandimpactondecisionsthanothers.CorporateSocialResponsibility3MaketheWorldaBetterPlace. BenandJerry’scorporatemissionstatement.IntegrativeModelofCSRShouldbusinessbeexpectedtosacrificeprofitsforsocialends?Thereareorganizationsthatpursuesocialendsastheverycoreoftheirmission,suchasnonprofits.Somefor-profitorganizationshavesocialgoalsasacentralpartofthestrategicmission.Becausethesefirmsintegrateeconomicandsocialgoals,theyareusingtheintegrativemodelofCSR.Therearenoclaimsthateverybusinessshouldadopttheprinciplesofbenefitcorporations.Benefitcorporationsshowprofitisnotincompatiblewithdoinggood,andthereforethatonecandogoodprofitably.Othersarguesustainabilityisrelevanttoeverybusinessconcern.TheImplicationsofSustainabilityAsatopicwithinCSR,sustainabilitymeansafirm’sfinancialgoalsmustbebalancedagainst,andmaybeoverriddenby,environmentalconsiderations.Defenderssayalleconomicactivityexistsinabiospherethatsupportsalllife.And,theyarguethatthepresentmodelofeconomics,andespeciallythemacroeconomicgoalofeconomicgrowthisalreadyrunningupagainstthelimitsofthebiosphere'scapacitytosustainlife.Fromthisperspective,successmustbejudgedbythefinancialbottomline,aswellastheecologicalandsocialbottomlines.Acorporatesustainabilityreportprovidesallstakeholderswithfinancialandotherinformationregardingafirm’seconomic,environmental,andsocialperformance.CorporateSocialResponsibilityWearenotinbusinesstomakemaximumprofitforourshareholders.Weareinbusiness…toservesociety.Profitisourrewardfordoingitwell.Ifbusinessdoesnotservesociety,societywillnotlongtolerateourprofitsorevenourexistence.KennethDayton,formerchairoftheDayton-HudsonCorporationExploringEnlightenedSelf-InterestArethereotherreasonsbesidesself-interestandeconomicsforabusinesstoengageinsociallyresponsibleactivities?CSRcanimpactafirm’sreputationwithinacommunity.Theproblemwithafocusonreputationisthatsocialresponsibilitythencanbecomemerelysocialmarketing.Thepracticeofattendingtothe"image"ofafirmisreferredtoasreputationmanagement;failuretodosomightbeapoorbusinessdecision.CompaniesmaybechallengedforengaginginCSRactivitiessolelyforthepurposeofaffectingtheirreputations.Therearemanyaspectsofafirm’sreputation.Itcanbewell-respectedforitsproductsandservices,foritsfinancialperformance,asagoodplacetowork,andasagoodcorporatecitizen.Ifafirmdevelopsabadreputation,itcancreatesignificantbarrierstobusinesssuccess.ExploringEnlightenedSelf-Interest1Isgoodethicsalsogoodbusiness?Enlightenedself-interestpresumesitis,oratleastcanbe.Theoristscontinuetodisputewhetherethicaldecisionsleadtomoresignificantprofitsthanunethicaldecisions.Thereisageneralagreementthatethicspaysoffinthelongrun,buthowtomeasurethatpayoffisthechallenge.Oftenthemeasurementofagoodreputationisnotevidentorobvious.Isthereabusinesscaseforreturnoninvestmentfromethics?Evidencesaysyes,butthedominantthinkingisthat,ifitcannotbemeasured,itisnotimportant.ExploringEnlightenedSelf-Interest2Measurementiscriticalastherearedetractors.DavidVogelfromBerkeleycontendsthatfirmswithstrongCSRmissionsserveanichemarketofconsumersandinvestors.Arguesthatcontrarytoaglobalshiftinthebusinessenvironment,CSRinsteadshouldbeperceivedasjustoneoptionResearchconcludesthatitdoespayforbusinessesinemergingmarketstopursueawiderroleinenvironmentalandsocialissues.Studiesfindthereareanumberofexpected—andmeasurable—outcomestoethicsprogramsinorganizations.ConclusionThischaptersoughttoanswerthequestionofwhetherthereexistsasocialresponsibilityofbusiness.Severalsourceswereproposed.Responsibilitymaybebasedinaconceptofgoodcorporatecitizenship,asocialcontract,orenlightenedself-interest.Thechapterexploredthechallengeofhowaninanimateentity(acorporation)couldhavearesponsibilitytoothers.Italsodiscussedtheextentofthatobligation,bothinlawandethics.OnethingthatiscertaintodayisthatitisimpossibletoengageinbusinesstodaywithoutencounteringandaddressingCSR.AccessibilityContent:TextAlternativesforImagesFigure5.1:ModelsofCorporateSocialResponsibility-TextAlternativeReturntoparent-slidecontainingimageTheeconomicmodelofCSRstatesthattheprimaryresponsibilityofmanagementistomaximizeprofitwithinthelaw.Intheeconomicmodel,managementmayalsochoosetocontributetosocietyasamatterofphilanthropy,butnotasamatterofdutyorsocialresponsibility.Theymaycontributeforreputationalpurposes.Socialresponsibilitycontributestoprofitability.Ortheymaycontributebecauseitistherightthingtodo.ThestakeholdermodelofCSRassertsthatbusinessisembeddedwithinawebofsocialrelationshipsofmutualrightsandresponsibilities.Businessmanagershaveresponsibilitiestoarangeofstakeholders.TheintegrativemodelofCSRholdsthatsocialresponsibilityisintegrateddirectlyintothemissionandpurposeofthecorporations.Exampleswouldbebenefitcorporations,suchasBenandJerry’s.ChapterSix:EthicalDecisionMaking:EmployerResponsibilitiesandEmployeeRightsCopyright©2021McGraw-HillEducation.Allrightsreserved.NoreproductionordistributionwithoutthepriorwrittenconsentofMcGraw-HillEducation.ChapterObjectives1Afterreadingthischapter,youwillbeableto:Distinguishbetweenthetwodistinctperspectivesoftheethicsofworkplacerelationships.Explaintheconceptofdueprocessintheworkplace.Describehowtodownsizeinanethicalmanner.Explainthedifferencebetweenintrinsicandinstrumentalvalueintermsofhealthandsafety.Illustrateanemployer’sresponsibilitywithregardtoemployeehealthandsafetyandwhythemarketisnoteffectiveatmanagingthisresponsibility.ChapterObjectives2Explainthebasicargumentsforandagainstregulationofthegloballaborenvironment.Describetheargumentforamarket-basedresolutiontoworkplacediscrimination.Definediversityasitappliestotheworkplace,aswellasitsbenefitsandchallenges.Explainaffirmativeactionanddescribethethreewaysinwhichaffirmativeactionmaybelegallypermissible.EthicalDecisionMakingHirecharacter.Trainskill.PeterSchutzEthicsandBusinessTheemployergenerallygetstheemployeeshedeserves.J.PaulGettyIntroduction1Ethicsintheemploymentcontextisauniversaltopic.Thelawprovidesguidanceforthinkingaboutethicalissuesintheworkplace,buttheseissuesgowellbeyondlegalconsiderations.Thischapterexploresareasofethicaldecisionmakingintheworkplaceremainsrelativelyfluidandwhereanswersarenoteasilyfoundbysimplycallingthecompanylawyer.Introduction2Variousethicalchallengesfacingthenatureofemployerresponsibilitiesandtheemployeeareaddressedinthischapter.Aseachissueisexamined,trytoemploytheethicaldecision-makingprocesstoreachthebestpossibleconclusionforthestakeholders.Utilizinganethicaldecision-makingprocessavoidslaterhurdlesandremovesbarrierstoprogressandmomentum.EthicalIssuesintheWorkplace:TheCurrentEnvironment1

Ethicsatworkandinhumanresourcemanagementisaboutrelationshipswithothersandwiththecompany.Companieswhoplaceemployeesatthecoreoftheirstrategiesproducehigherlong-termreturnstoshareholdersthantheirindustrypeers–morethandouble.EthicalIssuesintheWorkplace:TheCurrentEnvironment250%ofU.S.workersfeelstrongloyaltytotheiremployer.Importantfactorforthemwastofeelvaluedbyelementssuchasbenefitsandopportunitiesforprofessionalgrowth.78%ofthoseworkerswhoexperiencedunethicaloruncivilbehavioratworkreportthattheircommitmenttotheorganizationdeclined.66%saidtheirperformancedeclined.EthicalIssuesintheWorkplace:TheCurrentEnvironment3Treatemployeeswellforareturn.Thereturnisharmony,productivity,andinnovation.Effectivefirmssharecommonpractices,allofwhichinvolvetreatingemployeesinhumaneandrespectfulways.Managershaveanimpactontheemotionsoftheirworkersasdorewards,compensation,andcompositionofteams.Treatemployeeswelloutofasenseofduty.Thisapproachemphasizestherightsanddutiesofallemployees.Andtreatingthemwellsimplybecauseitis"therightthingtodo".Asenseofdutymightstemfromthelaw,professionalcodesofconduct,corporatecodesofconduct,ormoralprinciples.DefiningtheEmploymentRelationship1Ethicalissuesareboundtoriseoncearelationshipisformedbetweenanemployerandanemployee.Toworkforanotherpersonraisesissuesofpower,obligation,responsibility,fairtreatment,andexpectations.Legalrequirementsmightprotectsomeoftheemployee'sandemployer'sinterestsbutcanonlygosofar.DefiningtheEmploymentRelationship2Thenextsectionscovertheethicsunderlyingtheconceptsofdueprocessandfairnessthatdeterminesacceptableworkplacebehavior.Therelationshipisfurtherdefinedbytheapplicationoftheseprinciplestoworkingconditions.Issuesinthefollowingsectionsaresettledfromanethicalperspectivebytheirjustification.DueProcessandJustCause1Shouldemployers’rightsandabilitytohire,fire,ordisciplineemployeesberestrictedtopreventinjustices?Philosophically,therightofdueprocessistherighttobeprotectedagainstthearbitraryuseofauthority.Inlegalcontexts,dueprocessistheproceduresthatpoliceandcourtsmustfollowinexercisingtheirauthorityovercitizens.DueProcessandJustCause2Dueprocessintheworkplaceacknowledgesanemployer’sauthorityoveremployees.Basicfairness—implementedthroughdueprocess—demandsthatthispowerbeusedjustly.However,workplacebullyingandotheremotionalabuseisaproblem,especiallyintheservicesector.Thisbehaviordirectlyandindirectlyimpactsemployees.DueProcessandJustCause3Whilebasicfairnessdemandsemployersusepowerjustly,thelawdoesnotalwaysclearlysupportthismandateofjustice.MostU.S.employmentlawevolvedinacontextofalegaldoctrineknowsasemploymentatwill(EAW).EAWholdsthat,intheabsenceofaparticularcontractualorotherlegalobligationthatspecifiesthelengthorconditionsofemployment,allemployeesareemployed"atwill."Employersmayfireemployeesatanytime,foranyreason.Employeesarealsofreetofireanemployeeatanytimeandforanyreason;EAWworkermayopttoleaveajobatanytimeforanyreasonSothefreedomistheoreticallymutual.DueProcessandJustCause4TheethicalrationaleforEAWisthatitisanimportantmanagementtool,whichgivesmanagerstheabilitytomakeefficientdecisionsthatshouldcontributetothegreateroverallgood.EvenifEAWwereaneffectivemanagementtoo,justicedemandssuchtoolsnotbeusedtoharmotherpeople.Therightofprivatepropertyitselfislimitedbyotherrightsandduties.Whilethefreedomtoterminateemploymentistheoreticallymutual,thereisanunbalancedpowerrelationshipbetweenthetwoparties.ThecourtsandlegislaturehascreatedexceptionstoEAW.Civilrightslaws,laborlaws,andconstitutionallimitationsongovernmentauthorityintotheworkplacetoprotectemployees.ExceptionstotheDoctrineofEmploymentatWill1Statesvaryintermsoftheirrecognitionofthefollowingexceptionstothedoctrineofemploymentatwill.Somestatesrecognizeoneormoreexceptions,whileothersmightrecognizenoneatall.Inaddition,thedefinitionoftheseexceptionsmayvaryfromstatetostate.Badfaith,malicious,orretaliatoryterminationinviolationofpublicpolicy.Terminationinbreachoftheimpliedcovenantofgoodfaithandfairdealing.Terminationinbreachofsomeotherimpliedcontractterm,suchasthosethatmightbecreatedbyemployeehandbookprovisions(incertainjurisdictions).ExceptionstotheDoctrineofEmploymentatWill2Terminationinviolationofthedoctrineofpromissoryestoppel(wheretheemployeereasonablyreliedonanemployer’spromise,totheemployee’sdetriment).Otherexceptionsasdeterminedbystatutes(suchastheWorkerAdjustmentandRetrainingNotificationAct[WARN]ortheFamilyandMedicalLeaveAct[FMLA]).DueProcessandJustCause5EAWholdsincourtuntilandunlessanexceptioncanbedemonstrated.Theburdenofprooflieswiththedismissedemployeetoshowthatsheorhewasunjustlyorillegallyfired.Dueprocessandjustcausewouldreversethisburdenofproofontotheemployer.Justcause:Astandardforterminationsordisciplinethatrequirestheemployertohavesufficientandfaircausebeforereachingadecisionagainstanemployee.DueProcessandJustCause6Dueprocessissuesariseinotheremploymentcontexts.Fairtreatmentinvolvesfairnessinareassuchaspromotions,salary,andbenefits.Asthesedecisionsaremadeonthebasisofperformanceappraisals,dueprocessrightsshouldextendtothisaspectoftheworkplace.Theethicalquestionsthatremain,arewhetherthisatmosphereisfairandjustforallstakeholders.Dueprocessistherighttobeprotectedagainstthearbitraryuseofauthority.Decisionmakersmustguardagainstthosearbitrarydecisions.Decisionsshouldbemadeinlightofreasonsthatcanbeethicallydefended.Downsizing1Thereductionofhumanresourcesatanorganizationthroughterminations,retirements,corporatedivestments,orothermeans.Thedecisionitselfraisesethicalissuesbecausemaybetherewerealternativesavailabletoanorganizationinfinancialdifficulty.Considertheimpactofeachalternativefromthestakeholders'perspective.

Downsizing2Negativeoutcomesinclude:Poorrecommendationsofthefirmbyformeremployees.Adeclineincustomerservicebysurvivingemployees.Anincreaseinerrorsordangerousbehaviorbyemployees.Badattitudesfromremainingworkers.Downsizing3Ethicsmustbecentraltothedesignandmanagementoflayoffpolicies.Thedecisionfordownsizingshouldbemadebyarepresentativegrouptoconsiderallstakeholderinterestsandearnthetrustofthosewhowillbeimpacted.Thefactsshouldbecollected,andissuesshouldbedetermined.Noticeofanintenttodownsizeshouldgivenassoonasthedownsizingisgoingtohappen.Costsandbenefitsmustbeweighedinanycommunicationdecision.Identifystakeholdersanddefinetheimpactofdownsizingoneach.Downsizing4Fromalegalperspective,thedecisionaboutwhomtoincludeinadownsizingeffortmustbecarefullyplanned.Firmsshouldreviewboththefairnessoftheirdecision-makingprocessandtheconsequenceofthatprocessonthoseterminated,andtheresultingcompositionoftheworkforce.Downsizingimpactscountlessstakeholders.HealthandSafety1Employeeshaveafundamentalrighttoasafeandhealthyworkplace.However,insomeworkplacesinourworld,employeeslackeventhemostbasichealthandsafetyprotections;theseworkenvironmentshavebeencalledsweatshops.Theextentofemployerresponsibilityisindispute,andthereisdisagreementaboutthebestpoliciestoprotecthealthandsafety.HealthandSafety2Likework,healthandsafetyare"goods"thatarevaluedasameansforattaininganendandalsoasendsinthemselves.Healthandsafetyhaveintrinsicvalueinadditiontoinstrumentalvalue.Ifapersondiesinaworkplaceaccident,theirlostwageswouldbetheinstrumentalvalue.Theintrinsicvalueoftheirlifeisirreplaceablebyfinancialmeans.If"safe"meanscompletelyfreefromrisk,certainlynoworkplaceisperfectlysafe.Ifhealthandsafetyareinterpretedasideals,impossibletorealize,thenitwouldbeunreasonabletoclaimthatemployeeshavearighttoahealthyandsafeworkplace.Figure6.1:CalculatingAcceptableLevelofRiskFromthisperspective,aworkplaceissafeiftherisksareacceptable.Accessthetextalternativeforslideimage.ChallengestotheAcceptableRiskApproachtoHealthandSafetyTreatsemployeesdisrespectfullybyignoringtheirinputasstakeholders.Ignoresthefundamentaldeontologicalrightanemployeemighthavetoasafeandhealthyworkingenvironment.Assumesanequivalencybetweenworkplacerisksandothertypesofriskswhentherearesignificantdifferencesbetweenthem.Improperlyplacesincentivesbecausetherisksfacedatworkcouldbecontrolledbyotherswhomightstandtobenefitbynotreducingthem. HealthandSafetyasMarketControlledDefendersofthefreemarketandtheclassicalmodelofcorporatesocialresponsibilitywouldfavorindividualbargainingastheapproachtoworkplacehealthandsafety.Workersdemandinghighersafetystandardsandhealthierconditionswouldsettleforlowerwages.Workerswillingtotakehigherriskswoulddemandhigherwages.Inacompetitiveandfreelabormarket,individualbargainingwouldresultintheoptimaldistributionofsafetyandincome.Themarketapproachcansupportcompensationtoinjuredworkerswhenitcanbeshownthatemployerswereresponsiblefortheharm.Thethreatofcompensationactsasanincentiveforemployerstomaintainareasonablysafeandhealthworkplace.ChallengeswiththeFree-MarketApproachtoHealthandSafetyLabormarketsarenotperfectlycompetitiveandfree.Employeesseldom,ifever,possessthekindofperfectinformationmarketsrequire.Weignoreimportantquestionsofsocialjusticeandpublicpolicyifweapproachquestionssolelyfromthepointofviewofanindividual. HealthandSafetyasGovernment-RegulatedEthics1Mandatorygovernmentstandards:Canbesetwiththebestavailablescientificknowledgeandthusovercomingmarketfailuresfromlesserinformation.Preventemployeesfromchoosingbetweenjobandsafety.Focusonpreventionratherthancompensation.Areasocialapproachaddressingpublicpolicyquestionsignoredbymarkets.OccupationalSafetyandHealthAdministration(OSHA):AgencyofthefederalgovernmentthatpublishesandenforcessafetyandhealthregulationsforU.S.businesses.HealthandSafetyasGovernment-RegulatedEthics2OSHAregulationswereaimedatachievingthesafestfeasiblestandards,allowingtradeoffsbetweenhealthandeconomics.CriticsinbothindustryandgovernmentarguethatOSHAshouldusecost-benefitsanalysiswhensettingstandards.Thisapproachwouldleadbacktothegoalsofthemarket-basedapproachofindividualbargaining,alongwithitsethicalchallenges.Notehowever,thatrejectingcost-benefitanalysisinsettingstandardsisnotthesameascost-effectivestrategiesinimplementingthosestandards.Cost-benefitanalysisuseseconomiccriteriainsettingstandardsandisthereforeethicallyproblematic.HealthandSafetyasGovernment-RegulatedEthics3ThepoliciesthathaveemergedbyconsensuswithintheUnitedStatesseemtobemostdefensible.Employeeshavealegitimateethicalclaimonmandatoryhealthandsafetystandardswithinthewo

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论