环境行政公益诉讼的诉讼请求精准化研究基于540份裁判文书的实证分析

环境行政公益诉讼的诉讼请求精准化研究基于540份裁判文书的实证分析一、本文概述Overviewofthisarticle环境行政公益诉讼作为一种重要的法律手段，旨在保护环境公共利益，促进生态文明建设。近年来，随着环境问题的日益突出，环境行政公益诉讼在维护环境公共利益、监督政府环境行为方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而，在实践中，环境行政公益诉讼的诉讼请求往往存在模糊、泛化等问题，影响了诉讼效果和司法公正。因此，本文旨在通过对540份环境行政公益诉讼裁判文书的实证分析，探讨环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求精准化的必要性、可行性及实现路径，以期为完善环境行政公益诉讼制度、提高诉讼效果提供有益参考。Environmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,asanimportantlegalmeans,aimstoprotectthepublicinterestoftheenvironmentandpromotetheconstructionofecologicalcivilization.Inrecentyears,withtheincreasinglyprominentenvironmentalissues,environmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationhasplayedanincreasinglyimportantroleinmaintainingenvironmentalpublicinterestsandsupervisinggovernmentenvironmentalbehavior.However,inpractice,thelitigationrequestsofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationoftenhaveproblemssuchasambiguityandgeneralization,whichaffecttheeffectivenessoflitigationandjudicialfairness.Therefore,thisarticleaimstoexplorethenecessity,feasibility,andimplementationpathofpreciseenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequeststhroughempiricalanalysisof540environmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationjudgmentdocuments,inordertoprovideusefulreferenceforimprovingtheenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationsystemandimprovinglitigationeffectiveness.具体而言，本文首先对环境行政公益诉讼的基本概念、发展历程及现状进行梳理，明确环境行政公益诉讼在保护环境公共利益方面的重要作用。通过对540份裁判文书的实证分析，深入剖析环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求存在的问题及其原因，揭示诉讼请求精准化的紧迫性和重要性。在此基础上，本文进一步探讨环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求精准化的实现路径，包括明确诉讼请求的具体内容、规范诉讼请求的表述方式、加强诉讼请求与证据之间的关联性等。本文提出完善环境行政公益诉讼制度、提高诉讼效果的建议，以期为推动环境行政公益诉讼的精准化、规范化提供有益参考。Specifically,thisarticlefirstreviewsthebasicconcepts,developmenthistory,andcurrentsituationofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,clarifyingtheimportantroleofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationinprotectingenvironmentalpublicinterests.Throughempiricalanalysisof540judgmentdocuments,thisstudydelvesintotheproblemsandcausesofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequests,revealingtheurgencyandimportanceofpreciselitigationrequests.Onthisbasis,thisarticlefurtherexplorestheimplementationpathofprecisioninenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequests,includingclarifyingthespecificcontentoflitigationrequests,standardizingtheexpressionoflitigationrequests,andstrengtheningthecorrelationbetweenlitigationrequestsandevidence.Thisarticleproposessuggestionstoimprovethesystemofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationandenhancetheeffectivenessoflitigation,inordertoprovideusefulreferencesforpromotingtheprecisionandstandardizationofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.通过本文的研究，我们期望能够为环境行政公益诉讼的精准化提供理论支持和实践指导，推动环境行政公益诉讼制度的不断完善和发展，为实现生态文明建设的目标贡献力量。Throughtheresearchinthisarticle,wehopetoprovidetheoreticalsupportandpracticalguidancefortheprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,promotethecontinuousimprovementanddevelopmentoftheenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationsystem,andcontributetothegoalofachievingecologicalcivilizationconstruction.二、环境行政公益诉讼概述OverviewofEnvironmentalAdministrativePublicInterestLitigation环境行政公益诉讼，作为一种特殊的行政诉讼形式，旨在保护环境公共利益免受不当行政行为的侵害。这一诉讼形式的出现，是对传统行政诉讼制度的重要补充，也是应对日益严峻的环境问题、强化环境保护法治化手段的重要举措。环境行政公益诉讼的核心在于其“公益”性质，即诉讼的提起并非为了维护个人或特定群体的利益，而是为了维护环境公共利益，保障公众享有良好环境的权利。Environmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,asaspecialformofadministrativelitigation,aimstoprotectthepublicinterestoftheenvironmentfromimproperadministrativeactions.Theemergenceofthislitigationformisanimportantsupplementtothetraditionaladministrativelitigationsystem,aswellasanimportantmeasuretoaddresstheincreasinglysevereenvironmentalproblemsandstrengthenthelegalmeansofenvironmentalprotection.Thecoreofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationliesinits"publicinterest"nature,thatis,thefilingofthelawsuitisnottoprotecttheinterestsofindividualsorspecificgroups,buttosafeguardthepublicinterestintheenvironmentandsafeguardtherightofthepublictoenjoyagoodenvironment.环境行政公益诉讼的特点在于其诉讼请求的精准化。与传统的行政诉讼相比，环境行政公益诉讼更加强调对环境问题的具体性、针对性和实效性。这意味着在提起诉讼时，原告需要明确指出环境问题的具体表现、成因以及不当行政行为与环境问题之间的因果关系，从而确保法院能够准确判断案件的性质和焦点，作出合理的裁判。Thecharacteristicofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationliesintheprecisionofitslitigationrequests.Comparedwithtraditionaladministrativelitigation,environmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationemphasizesmoreonthespecificity,targeting,andeffectivenessofenvironmentalissues.Thismeansthatwhenfilingalawsuit,theplaintiffneedstoclearlypointoutthespecificmanifestations,causes,andcausalrelationshipbetweenimproperadministrativebehaviorandenvironmentalissues,inordertoensurethatthecourtcanaccuratelyjudgethenatureandfocusofthecaseandmakereasonablejudgments.为了深入研究环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的精准化问题，本文基于540份裁判文书进行了实证分析。这些裁判文书涵盖了近年来我国各级法院审理的环境行政公益诉讼案件，具有广泛的代表性和较高的研究价值。通过对这些裁判文书的梳理和分析，我们可以发现环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求精准化的现状、问题及其成因，为进一步完善环境行政公益诉讼制度提供有益的参考和借鉴。Inordertoconductin-depthresearchontheprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequests,thisarticleconductsempiricalanalysisbasedon540judgmentdocuments.ThesejudicialdocumentscoverenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationcasestriedbycourtsatalllevelsinChinainrecentyears,andhavebroadrepresentativenessandhighresearchvalue.Throughthesortingandanalysisofthesejudgmentdocuments,wecandiscoverthecurrentsituation,problems,andcausesoftheprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequests,providingusefulreferenceandinspirationforfurtherimprovingtheenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationsystem.环境行政公益诉讼作为一种新型的行政诉讼形式，在保护环境公共利益方面发挥着不可替代的作用。而诉讼请求的精准化则是环境行政公益诉讼的核心和关键所在。通过实证分析的方法研究环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的精准化问题，有助于我们更加深入地理解这一制度的运行机制和实际效果，为推动环境保护法治化进程提供有力的理论支撑和实践指导。Environmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,asanewformofadministrativelitigation,playsanirreplaceableroleinprotectingthepublicinterestoftheenvironment.Theprecisionoflitigationrequestsisthecoreandkeyofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.Studyingtheprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequeststhroughempiricalanalysismethodshelpsustohaveadeeperunderstandingoftheoperatingmechanismandpracticaleffectsofthissystem,providingstrongtheoreticalsupportandpracticalguidanceforpromotingtheprocessofenvironmentalprotectionruleoflaw.三、环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的实证分析EmpiricalAnalysisofLitigationClaimsinEnvironmentalAdministrativePublicInterestLitigation基于540份裁判文书的实证分析，我们深入探讨了环境行政公益诉讼的诉讼请求精准化问题。这些裁判文书来自全国各地，涉及不同类型的环境案件，为我们提供了丰富的数据和案例，有助于我们更全面地了解环境行政公益诉讼的现状和问题。Basedonempiricalanalysisof540judgmentdocuments,wehavedelvedintotheissueofpreciselitigationrequestsinenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.Thesejudicialdocumentscomefromalloverthecountryandinvolvedifferenttypesofenvironmentalcases,providinguswithrichdataandcases,whichhelpsustohaveamorecomprehensiveunderstandingofthecurrentsituationandproblemsofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.我们分析了这些裁判文书中诉讼请求的类型和分布情况。结果显示，大部分案件涉及环境保护、生态修复、污染防治等方面的诉讼请求。其中，要求行政机关履行环境保护职责的案件占比最高，显示出环境行政公益诉讼的主要目标是推动行政机关积极履行环境保护职责。Weanalyzedthetypesanddistributionoflitigationrequestsinthesejudicialdocuments.Theresultsshowthatthemajorityofcasesinvolvelitigationrequestsinareassuchasenvironmentalprotection,ecologicalrestoration,andpollutionpreventionandcontrol.Amongthem,theproportionofcasesrequiringadministrativeagenciestofulfilltheirenvironmentalprotectionresponsibilitiesisthehighest,indicatingthatthemaingoalofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationistopromoteadministrativeagenciestoactivelyfulfilltheirenvironmentalprotectionresponsibilities.我们对这些诉讼请求的精准化程度进行了评估。通过分析发现，部分诉讼请求存在表述模糊、缺乏具体操作性等问题，导致法院在判决时难以准确把握。例如，一些案件中原告要求行政机关加强环境保护措施，但未明确具体措施内容和标准，使得诉讼请求难以得到精准执行。Wehaveevaluatedtheaccuracyoftheselitigationrequests.Throughanalysis,ithasbeenfoundthatsomelitigationrequestshaveproblemssuchasunclearexpressionandlackofspecificoperability,whichmakesitdifficultforthecourttoaccuratelygrasptheminthejudgment.Forexample,insomecases,theplaintiffrequeststheadministrativeauthoritytostrengthenenvironmentalprotectionmeasures,butdoesnotspecifythespecificcontentandstandardsofthemeasures,makingitdifficultforthelitigationrequesttobeaccuratelyexecuted.针对这些问题，我们进一步探讨了诉讼请求精准化的重要性。精准化的诉讼请求有助于法院明确案件争议焦点，提高审判效率；同时，也能引导行政机关更加准确地履行职责，提升环境保护效果。因此，我们在实证分析的基础上，提出了加强诉讼请求精准化的建议。Inresponsetotheseissues,wefurtherexploredtheimportanceofpreciselitigationrequests.Accuratelitigationrequestshelpcourtsclarifythefocusofdisputesincasesandimprovetrialefficiency;Atthesametime,itcanalsoguideadministrativeagenciestomoreaccuratelyfulfilltheirresponsibilitiesandimprovetheeffectivenessofenvironmentalprotection.Therefore,basedonempiricalanalysis,weproposesuggestionstostrengthentheprecisionoflitigationrequests.我们结合具体案例，详细阐述了诉讼请求精准化的实践应用。例如，在某起环境污染案件中，原告明确要求被告行政机关在规定期限内完成污染源的排查和整治工作，并制定了具体的整治标准和时间表。这一精准的诉讼请求不仅得到了法院的支持，也促使行政机关积极采取措施，有效改善了环境污染状况。Wehaveelaboratedonthepracticalapplicationofpreciselitigationrequeststhroughspecificcases.Forexample,inacertainenvironmentalpollutioncase,theplaintiffexplicitlyrequestedthedefendant'sadministrativeagencytocompletetheinvestigationandremediationofpollutionsourceswithintheprescribedtimelimit,andformulatedspecificremediationstandardsandschedules.Thispreciselitigationrequestnotonlyreceivedsupportfromthecourt,butalsopromptedadministrativeagenciestoactivelytakemeasurestoeffectivelyimprovetheenvironmentalpollutionsituation.通过对540份裁判文书的实证分析，我们深入探讨了环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的精准化问题。研究发现，部分诉讼请求存在表述模糊、缺乏具体操作性等问题，影响了案件的审判效果和环境保护效果。因此，我们提出加强诉讼请求精准化的建议，并通过具体案例展示了其实践应用。这将有助于推动环境行政公益诉讼的健康发展，更好地保护生态环境和公共利益。Throughempiricalanalysisof540judgmentdocuments,wehavedelvedintotheissueofprecisioninenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationclaims.Researchhasfoundthatsomelitigationrequestshaveproblemssuchasvagueexpressionandlackofspecificoperability,whichaffectsthetrialeffectivenessandenvironmentalprotectioneffectivenessofthecase.Therefore,weproposesuggestionstostrengthentheprecisionoflitigationrequestsanddemonstratetheirpracticalapplicationthroughspecificcases.Thiswillhelppromotethehealthydevelopmentofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationandbetterprotecttheecologicalenvironmentandpublicinterests.四、环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求精准化的必要性Thenecessityofprecisioninenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationclaims环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的精准化不仅是提升诉讼效率、保障司法公正的重要手段，也是实现环境行政公益诉讼制度目标的必然要求。以下从几个方面详细阐述环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求精准化的必要性。Theprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequestsisnotonlyanimportantmeanstoimprovelitigationefficiencyandensurejudicialfairness,butalsoaninevitablerequirementforachievingthegoalsoftheenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationsystem.Thefollowingelaboratesonthenecessityofprecisioninenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequestsfromseveralaspects.诉讼请求的精准化有助于提高诉讼效率。在环境行政公益诉讼中，若诉讼请求过于笼统或模糊，可能导致法院在审理过程中难以准确把握原告的诉求，进而影响判决的准确性和效率。通过精准化诉讼请求，可以使法院迅速定位争议焦点，有效减少不必要的审理环节，提高诉讼效率。Theprecisionoflitigationrequestshelpstoimprovelitigationefficiency.Inenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,ifthelitigationrequestistoogeneralorvague,itmaymakeitdifficultforthecourttoaccuratelygrasptheplaintiff'sdemandsduringthetrialprocess,therebyaffectingtheaccuracyandefficiencyofthejudgment.Bypreciselitigationrequests,thecourtcanquicklylocatethefocusofdisputes,effectivelyreduceunnecessarytrialprocesses,andimprovelitigationefficiency.诉讼请求的精准化有助于保障司法公正。在环境行政公益诉讼中，诉讼请求的精准化可以确保法院对案件进行全面、深入的审查，避免遗漏重要事实或法律问题。同时，精准化的诉讼请求也有助于防止原告滥用诉权，保障被告的合法权益。Theprecisionoflitigationrequestshelpstoensurejudicialfairness.Inenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,theprecisionoflitigationrequestscanensurethatthecourtconductsacomprehensiveandin-depthreviewofthecase,avoidingtheomissionofimportantfactsorlegalissues.Meanwhile,preciselitigationrequestsalsohelppreventplaintiffsfromabusingtheirlitigationrightsandprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofdefendants.再次，诉讼请求的精准化有助于实现环境行政公益诉讼的制度目标。环境行政公益诉讼的目的在于维护环境公共利益，推动行政机关依法行政。通过精准化诉讼请求，可以使法院更加准确地判断行政机关的违法行为及其对环境公共利益的影响，进而作出更加公正、合理的判决。这不仅有助于维护环境公共利益，还能促进行政机关依法行政，提高环境治理水平。Onceagain,theprecisionoflitigationrequestshelpstoachievetheinstitutionalgoalsofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.Thepurposeofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationistosafeguardthepublicinterestoftheenvironmentandpromoteadministrativeorganstoadministerinaccordancewiththelaw.Byrefininglitigationrequests,courtscanmoreaccuratelyassesstheillegalactionsofadministrativeagenciesandtheirimpactonthepublicinterestoftheenvironment,therebymakingmorefairandreasonablejudgments.Thisnotonlyhelpstomaintainthepublicinterestintheenvironment,butalsopromotesadministrativeagenciestoadministerinaccordancewiththelawandimprovethelevelofenvironmentalgovernance.诉讼请求的精准化也是适应环境法治建设需要的必然要求。随着环境法治建设的不断深入，对环境行政公益诉讼提出了更高的要求。精准化的诉讼请求可以更好地适应这些要求，推动环境行政公益诉讼制度的不断完善和发展。Theprecisionoflitigationrequestsisalsoaninevitablerequirementtomeettheneedsofenvironmentallegalconstruction.Withthecontinuousdeepeningofenvironmentallegalconstruction,higherrequirementshavebeenputforwardforenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.Accuratelitigationrequestscanbettermeettheserequirementsandpromotethecontinuousimprovementanddevelopmentoftheenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationsystem.环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的精准化对于提高诉讼效率、保障司法公正、实现制度目标以及适应环境法治建设需要具有重要意义。因此，在环境行政公益诉讼实践中，应重视诉讼请求的精准化问题，不断提高诉讼请求的准确性和针对性。Theprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequestsisofgreatsignificanceforimprovinglitigationefficiency,ensuringjudicialfairness,achievinginstitutionalgoals,andadaptingtotheneedsofenvironmentallegalconstruction.Therefore,inthepracticeofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,attentionshouldbepaidtotheprecisionoflitigationrequests,andtheaccuracyandpertinenceoflitigationrequestsshouldbecontinuouslyimproved.五、环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求精准化的实现路径TheImplementationPathofPreciseLitigationRequestsinEnvironmentalAdministrativePublicInterestLitigation环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的精准化，不仅关乎司法公正与效率，更是对环境法治建设的直接推动。要实现这一目标，需要采取一系列具体的策略和措施。Theprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequestsisnotonlyrelatedtojudicialfairnessandefficiency,butalsodirectlypromotestheconstructionofenvironmentalruleoflaw.Toachievethisgoal,aseriesofspecificstrategiesandmeasuresneedtobetaken.第一，提高起诉主体的专业化水平。环境行政公益诉讼涉及的专业知识广泛，包括环境科学、生态学、环境法规等多个领域。因此，提升起诉主体的专业化水平，包括加强对环境法律法规的理解和掌握，提高环境科学知识的应用能力，是确保诉讼请求精准化的基础。Firstly,improvetheprofessionalleveloftheprosecutionsubject.Environmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationinvolvesawiderangeofprofessionalknowledge,includingenvironmentalscience,ecology,environmentalregulations,andotherfields.Therefore,enhancingtheprofessionalleveloftheprosecutionsubject,includingstrengtheningtheunderstandingandmasteryofenvironmentallawsandregulations,andimprovingtheapplicationabilityofenvironmentalscientificknowledge,isthefoundationforensuringtheaccuracyoflitigationrequests.第二，明确诉讼请求的具体内容。在提起环境行政公益诉讼时，应尽可能明确具体的诉讼请求，避免使用模糊、笼统的表述。例如，应明确要求被告停止具体的违法行为，修复受损的环境，或者赔偿具体的损失等。Secondly,clarifythespecificcontentofthelitigationrequest.Whenfilingenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,specificlitigationrequestsshouldbeasclearaspossible,andvagueandvagueexpressionsshouldbeavoided.Forexample,thedefendantshouldbeexplicitlyrequiredtoceasespecificillegalactivities,repairdamagedenvironments,orcompensateforspecificlosses.第三，加强法院对诉讼请求的审查和指导。法院在受理环境行政公益诉讼时，应对诉讼请求进行严格的审查，确保其符合法律法规的规定，同时也符合环境保护的实际需要。对于诉讼请求不明确或者不合理的，法院应及时进行指导和建议，引导起诉主体进行修正和完善。Thirdly,strengthenthecourt'sreviewandguidanceonlitigationrequests.Whenacceptingenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,thecourtshouldconductstrictreviewofthelitigationrequesttoensurethatitcomplieswiththeprovisionsoflawsandregulations,aswellastheactualneedsofenvironmentalprotection.Forunclearorunreasonablelitigationrequests,thecourtshouldprovidetimelyguidanceandsuggestions,guidingtheplaintifftomakeamendmentsandimprovements.第四，建立和完善环境损害评估机制。环境损害评估是确定诉讼请求的重要依据。因此，应建立和完善环境损害评估机制，确保评估结果的科学性、公正性和权威性。同时，评估结果也应作为确定诉讼请求的重要依据，确保诉讼请求的精准化。Fourthly,establishandimproveanenvironmentaldamageassessmentmechanism.Environmentaldamageassessmentisanimportantbasisfordetermininglitigationclaims.Therefore,itisnecessarytoestablishandimproveanenvironmentaldamageassessmentmechanismtoensurethescientific,impartial,andauthoritativenatureoftheassessmentresults.Atthesametime,theevaluationresultsshouldalsoserveasanimportantbasisfordetermininglitigationclaims,ensuringtheaccuracyoflitigationclaims.第五，加强环境行政公益诉讼的宣传和教育。通过加强宣传和教育，提高公众对环境行政公益诉讼的认知度和参与度，有助于推动诉讼请求的精准化。通过公开、透明的审判过程，也能让公众了解和支持环境行政公益诉讼，进一步推动环境法治建设。Fifth,strengthenthepublicityandeducationofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.Strengtheningpublicityandeducationtoincreasepublicawarenessandparticipationinenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationcanhelppromotetheprecisionoflitigationrequests.Throughanopenandtransparenttrialprocess,thepubliccanalsounderstandandsupportenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,furtherpromotingtheconstructionofenvironmentalruleoflaw.实现环境行政公益诉讼诉讼请求的精准化，需要起诉主体、法院、环境损害评估机构以及公众的共同努力。只有这样，才能确保环境行政公益诉讼的顺利进行，有效保护环境公共利益，推动环境法治建设的深入发展。Theprecisionofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationrequestsrequiresthejointeffortsoftheplaintiff,thecourt,environmentaldamageassessmentinstitutions,andthepublic.Onlyinthiswaycanweensurethesmoothprogressofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,effectivelyprotectenvironmentalpublicinterests,andpromotethein-depthdevelopmentofenvironmentallegalconstruction.六、结论与展望ConclusionandOutlook通过对540份裁判文书的实证分析，本研究对环境行政公益诉讼的诉讼请求精准化进行了深入的探讨。研究发现，在环境行政公益诉讼中，诉讼请求的精准化对于提升案件胜诉率、保障环境权益以及推动环境法治建设具有重要意义。Throughempiricalanalysisof540judgmentdocuments,thisstudydelvesintotheprecisionoflitigationrequestsinenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation.Researchhasfoundthatinenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,theprecisionoflitigationrequestsisofgreatsignificanceforimprovingthesuccessrateofcases,protectingenvironmentalrightsandinterests,andpromotingtheconstructionofenvironmentalruleoflaw.具体而言，精准化的诉讼请求有助于法院更准确地把握案件争议焦点，提高审判效率；同时，也有助于原告方更明确地表达其诉求，增强诉讼的针对性和实效性。精准化的诉讼请求还有助于推动环境行政公益诉讼的规范化、专业化发展，提升环境司法保护的整体水平。Specifically,preciselitigationrequestshelpcourtsmoreaccuratelygraspthefocusofdisputesincasesandimprovetrialefficiency;Atthesametime,italsohelpstheplaintifftoexpresstheirdemandsmoreclearly,enhancingthepertinenceandeffectivenessofthelawsuit.Accuratelitigationrequestsalsohelppromotethestandardizedandprofessionaldevelopmentofenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigation,andenhancetheoveralllevelofenvironmentaljudicialprotection.然而，当前环境行政公益诉讼的诉讼请求精准化仍面临一些挑战和问题。例如，部分原告方在提起诉讼时缺乏明确的诉讼请求，导致案件审理过程中出现歧义和争议；部分法院在裁判文书中对诉讼请求的认定和处理也存在不够精准的情况，影响了案件的公正性和权威性。However,theprecisionoflitigationrequestsinenvironmentaladministrativepublicinterestlitigationstillfacessomechallengesandproblems.Forexample,someplaintiffslackclearlitigationrequestswhenfilinglawsuits,resultinginambiguityanddisputesduringthetrialprocessofthecase;Somecourtsalsohaveimpreciserecognitionandhandlingoflitigationclaim