版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
Thisarticlewasdownloadedby:[
]On:12March2024,At:06:22
Publisher:InstituteforOperationsResearchandtheManagementSciences(INFORMS)
INFORMSislocatedinMaryland,USA
ManagementScience
Publicationdetails,includinginstructionsforauthorsandsubscriptioninformation:
PanicSellingWhenDisasterStrikes:EvidenceintheBond
andStockMarkets
ThanhD.Huynh,YingXia
Tocitethisarticle:
ThanhD.Huynh,YingXia(2023)PanicSellingWhenDisasterStrikes:EvidenceintheBondandStockMarkets.ManagementScience69(12):7448-7467.
/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4018
Fulltermsandconditionsofuse:
/Publications/Librarians-Portal/PubsOnLine-Terms-and
-
Conditions
Thisarticlemaybeusedonlyforthepurposesofresearch,teaching,and/orprivatestudy.Commercialuseorsystematicdownloading(byrobotsorotherautomaticprocesses)isprohibitedwithoutexplicitPublisher
approval,unlessotherwisenoted.Formoreinformation,contactpermissions@.
ThePublisherdoesnotwarrantorguaranteethearticle’saccuracy,completeness,merchantability,fitnessforaparticularpurpose,ornon-infringement.Descriptionsof,orreferencesto,productsorpublications,orinclusionofanadvertisementinthisarticle,neitherconstitutesnorimpliesaguarantee,endorsement,or
supportofclaimsmadeofthatproduct,publication,orservice.
Copyright©2021,INFORMS
Pleasescrolldownforarticle—itisonsubsequentpages
>inferms.
With12,500membersfromnearly90countries,INFORMSisthelargestinternationalassociationofoperationsresearch(O.R.)
andanalyticsprofessionalsandstudents.INFORMSprovidesuniquenetworkingandlearningopportunitiesforindividual
professionals,andorganizationsofalltypesandsizes,tobetterunderstandanduseO.R.andanalyticstoolsandmethodsto
transformstrategicvisionsandachievebetteroutcomes.
FormoreinformationonINFORMS,itspublications,membership,ormeetingsvisit
7448
Downloadedfromby[
]on12March2024,at06:22.Forpersonaluseonly,allrightsreserved.
/journal/mnsc
MANAGEMENTSCIENCEVol.69,No.12,December2023,pp.7448–7467ISSN0025-1909(print),ISSN1526-5501(online)
PanicSellingWhenDisasterStrikes:EvidenceintheBondandStockMarkets
ThanhD.Huynh,aYingXiaa
aDepartmentofBankingandFinance,MonashBusinessSchool,MonashUniversity,Victoria3145,Australia
Contact:
thanh.huynh@
,
/0000-0001-7970-1464
(TDH);
ying.xia@
,
/0000-0003-1488-3732
(YX)
Received:March24,2020
Revised:September14,2020
Accepted:January16,2021
PublishedOnlineinArticlesinAdvance:August11,2021
/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4018
Copyright:©2021INFORMS
Abstract.Thisstudyusesdisaggregatedestablishment-leveldatatoidentifyairm’sexpo-suretophysicalclimateriskandexaminesinvestors’reactiontonaturaldisastersinboththeU.S.corporatebondandstockmarkets.Weindthat,whenairmisexposedtodisas-ters,investorsoverreactbydepressingthecurrentbondandstockprices,causingfuturere-turnstobehigher.However,irmswithastrongenvironmentalproileexperiencelowersellingpressureontheirbondsandstocks,althoughtheirfundamentalsweakenedfollow-ingdisasters.Theevidencesuggeststhatcorporateinvestmentinimprovingenvironmen-talproilespaysoffwhenclimatechangeriskismaterialized.
History:ThispaperwasacceptedbyColinMayer,SpecialSectionofManagementScienceonBusiness
andClimateChange.
SupplementalMaterial:Thedatailesandonlineappendixareavailableat
/10.1287/mnsc
.2021.4018
.
Keywords:physicalclimaterisk.naturaldisasters.overreaction.establishment-leveldata
1.Introduction
TheUnitedStatesisamongthetopthreecountrieshitbythegreatestnumberofnaturaldisastersoverthepasttwodecades(TheEconomist
2017
).1
BlackRock(
2019
)predictsthatextremeclimaticeventswillcostatleast1%ofgrossdomesticproduct(GDP)ofmostmetropolitanareasintheUnitedStatesby2060–2080undera“noclimateaction”scenario.HsiangandJina(
2014
)estimatethataheftycyclonecarriesthesameimpactonincomepercapitaasabankingcrisis,anditcanhaveaprolongedinfluenceontheeconomicde-velopmentofacountry.Inthisstudy,welookintothestockandbondmarketsandexaminehowinvestorsreactwhenairmisexposedtonaturaldisasters.
Giventhatstocksandbondsarethetwomajorcom-ponentsofairm’scostofinancing,examiningthemarketreactiontodisasterswilldeepenourunder-standingofthepossiblepenaltythatinvestorsimposeonexposedirms.Thisunderstandingalsoguidesmanagersonthetypeofcorporateinvestmentsthatmighthelpmitigatethesecosts.Forpolicymakers,itisimperativetoexaminewhetherthemarketreactionisconditionaluponirmattributes,becauseitimpliesthatpoliciespromotingeficientpricingofphysicalclimateriskmaynotbehomogenousforallirms.
Despitetheimportanceofthisirm-levelanalysis,thesequestionshavenotbeenfullyexploredinthecli-mateinanceliterature,possiblybecauseoftherestrict-edavailabilityofgranulardetailsonairm’sestablish-mentlocations.Ourstudycontributestothisliterature
byusingcomprehensiveestablishment-leveldataonsubsidiaries,branches,andplantsofU.S.irmsfromtheNationalEstablishmentTime-Series(NETS)data-baseandthecounty-levelinformationondisasterdamagesfromtheSpatialHazardEventsandLossesDatabasefortheUnitedStates(SHELDUS).Airmisdeemedtobeexposedtodisasterswhenitsestablish-mentsarelocatedindisaster-struckcounties.
Usingbothportfolioanalysisandmultivariateregres-sions,weindapositiverelationbetweenairm’sexpo-suretonaturaldisastersanditsfuturestockandbondreturns.Speciically,whenairm’sestablishmentsarelocatedincountieshitbynaturaldisasters,itsfuturemonthlystockreturnsincreaseby14.6basispoints(bps)anditsfuturemonthlybondreturnsincreaseby8.4bps.Themagnitudeiseconomicallymeaningful,becausetheseestimatesareequivalentto14%and16%ofthesamplemeansofstocksandbonds,respectively.Theseresultsarerobusttousingalternativemeasuresofirm-leveleconomicexposureandcontrollingforknownriskcharacteristics,unobservabletime-invariantdifferencesacrossirms,andseasonalityeffects.Moreover,theseef-fectsarestrongerasdisastersaremoresalient.Placebotestsofpseudo-disastersonunexposedirmsshowaninsigniicantrelation,suggestingthatourindingsarenotspuriousresults.
Wefurtherindthat,afteradisasterstrikes,thees-tablishment’ssalesandtheirm’saggregatesalesdecrease.
2
Theseresultsserveasvalidationforouridentiicationofaffectedestablishments,becauseitis
HuynhandXia:PanicSellingWhenDisasterStrikes
ManagementScience,2023,vol.69,no.12,pp.7448–7467,©2021INFORMS7449
Downloadedfromby[
]on12March2024,at06:22.Forpersonaluseonly,allrightsreserved.
successfulincapturingdisasterimpactsonirmfun-damentals.Theyalsoindicatethatbothbehavioraltheory(investors’overreactiontodisasters;DeBondtandThaler
1985
)andrationalexpectation(anincreaseinriskbecauseoflossesinirmfundamentals)couldexplainourheadlineindings.Wethereforepresentseveralindings,which,takentogether,leantowardthebehavioralexplanation.
Acentralpredictionoftheoverreactionhypothesisisthatinvestorsoverreacttodisastersbydepressingthecurrentpricesofexposedirms’stocksandbonds,causingthecontemporaneousrelationbetweenre-turnsanddisasterstobenegative.Aspricesdropbe-lowfundamentalvalues,theywillbounceback.Weindeedindthatcontemporaneousreturnsonbondsandstocksaresigniicantlylowerwhentheirmisex-posedtodisasters.Asaconsequenceofthispricepressure,weobserveanincreaseinreturnsonstocksandbondsofexposedirmsafterward.
Wenextuseinsidertradingactivitiestoexaminewhetherpricechangesarepurelydrivenbythereduc-tionofirmfundamentals.Ifinvestorsoverreacttodisastersbyoversellingexposedirms’stocks,thenin-siderscouldbebetteroffpurchasingtheirownstocks,becausestockpriceswerebelowtheirfundamentalvalues(Seyhun
1990
,RozeffandZaman
1998
).Wein-deedindthatinsiders’purchasesincrease,consistentwiththenotionthattheseinsidersbelievetheirownirms’sharepricesareoverlydepressed.
Totheextentthatattentiontoclimatechangeinfluen-cesinvestors’reactiontodisasters,weexpectthatourre-sultsaremorepronouncedinrecentyearswheninvest-ors’concernsaboutclimatechangeriskheightened(Kruegeretal.
2020
).UsingthepublicationoftheSternReviewin2006asaneventthatarousedpublicattentiontoclimatechange(Painter
2020
),weindthattheeffectofdisastersissigniicantonlyafter2006.
Arelatedquestioniswhyinvestorsaresurprisedbynaturaldisasters.Afterall,someregionsintheUnitedStatesaremorevulnerabletocertainpromi-nentdisastersthanotherareas.Traditionalassetpric-ingtheorypositsthatphysicalclimateriskcouldbediversiiedinamarketportfolioandthus,thepricesofexposedirms(and,inturn,theircostofcapital)shouldnotchangefollowingadisaster.Wecontendthatthisnullhypothesisisnotsupportedempirically,becausenaturaldisasterscannotbeperfectlypre-dicted(Rehseetal.
2019
)and,asclimatescientistsshow,climatechangehasfurtherexacerbatedanypre-dictability.
3
Withourdetaileddataonirmgeogra-phy,weshowinSection
3
thatthereisalargedegreeofuncertaintyinthedistributionofbothprominentandnonprominentdisastersinagivenarea(e.g.,un-certaintyaboutthelikelihoodofoccurring,timing,andthepotentialdollardamages).Therandomnessofdisasterdistributionssuggeststhatgeographic
diversiicationofbusinesslocationscouldnothelpairmtoavoiddisasterscompletely,becausethereisachancethattheirm’sestablishmentswillbehitbydisastersatsomepointintimeinthefuture.
Toexaminehowirmscanmitigatethesellingpres-sureontheirstocksandbondswhentheyareexposedtodisasters,weexplorewhetherinvestors’reactioniscondi-tionalonairm’senvironmentalproile.Weindthatthesellingpressureislesspronouncedamongirmswithahighenvironmentalscore(EScore),despitethefactthatbothhigh-andlow-EScoreirmssufferedanequallossinestablishmentsalesafterdisasters.
4
Consistently,irmswithmoresustainability-orientedandlong-terminstitu-tionalinvestorsalsoexperiencelowersellingpressurefol-lowingdisasters.Theseresultsareconsistentwiththeno-tionthat,becauseinvestorshavenonpecuniarymotiveswheninvestinginhigh-EScoreirms(Bakeretal.
2018,
HartzmarkandSussman
2019
,Barberetal.
2021
),theyimposealowerpenaltyontheseirms’stocksandbondswhentheirmsareexposedtodisasters.Theseindingsalsohaveimportantimplicationsforpolicymakers,whowishtoemphasizethebeneitsofcorporateinvestmentinenvironmentalproiles:itpaysoffwhentheconse-quencesofclimatechangearematerialized.
Inthenextsection,weoutlineourcontributionstotheclimateinanceliteratureanddevelopourhypoth-eses.Section
3
describesourdataandsampleselec-tion.InSection
4
,wereportthemainempiricalre-sults,robustnessanalyses,andtestsofalternativeexplanations.WeconcludeinSection
5
.
2.RelatedLiteratureandHypotheses
2.1.ABriefReviewofRelatedLiteratureandContributions
Ourstudycontributestoaburgeoningclimateinanceliteraturethatexaminestheeffectsofclimatechangerisksonirms,andinparticular,theassetpricingimpli-cationsoftheserisks.Astrandofthisliteraturestudiescarbonrisk,socialcostsofcarbonemissions,andthereturnpremiumofcarbon-intensiveirms(Barnettetal.
2020
;BoltonandKacperczyk
2020
,
2021
;Choietal.
2020
;Hsuetal.
2020
;Ilhanetal.
2021
).Otherstudiesexaminetheeffectsofclimateregulatoryriskandtherelationbetweenirmriskandenvironment,social,andgovernance(ESG)(deGreiffetal.
2018
,Dunnetal.
2018
,Hoepneretal.
2020
,Seltzeretal.
2020
).Demandsforhedgingagainstclimateriskcanalsoaffectassetprices(Engleetal.
2020
,HuynhandXia
2021
).
Ourstudyisrelatedtothestrandofclimateinanceliteraturethatexaminesphysicalclimateriskintheformofextremeclimaticevents.Hongetal.(
2019
)indthatinternationalmarketsunderreacttothelong-termtrendsindroughts.Aloketal.(
2020
)showthatmutualfundmanagerslocatednearadisasterzoneunder-weightdisaster-pronestocks.Otherstudiesexamine
HuynhandXia:PanicSellingWhenDisasterStrikes
7450ManagementScience,2023,vol.69,no.12,pp.7448–7467,©2021INFORMS
Downloadedfromby[
]on12March2024,at06:22.Forpersonaluseonly,allrightsreserved.
theeffectsofextremeclimaticeventsonirms’draw-ingofbankcreditlines(Brownetal.
2021
),insuranceirms(MassaandZhang
2021
),corporatecashhold-ings(DessaintandMatray
2017
),manufacturingirms’performance(Hsuetal.
2018
),andsupplychains(Bar-rotandSauvagnat
2016
)
.5
Althoughtheliteraturehasstudiedthepricingofcli-materiskinvariousassetclasses,thereisadearthofresearchthatestimatestheeffectsofairm’sdirectex-posuretodisastersonbothstockandcorporatebondreturns,whicharethetwomajorcomponentsoftheirm’scapitalstructure.
6
Ourstudyaimstoillthisvoidbyusingacomprehensivedatasetonestablish-ment-levellocationstoidentifyairm’sexposuretonaturaldisastersatthecountylevel.Thisidentiicationisimportantbecauseairm’smainbusinessoperationstypicallyhappenatestablishments.Becausestocksandcorporatebondsareissuedbytheexposedirm,ifdis-astersaffecttheirm,thenbothstockandbondpricescouldreacttotheseimpacts.Furthermore,bondsaremainlyheldbyinstitutions(Baietal.
2019
),whoarein-creasinglyconcernedaboutclimaterisk(Ilhanetal.
2020
,Kruegeretal.
2020
).Totheextentthatinstitu-tionsdrivethemarketreactiontodisasters,weshouldexpectthattheeffectisalsopresentinbonds,therebyofferinganotherlaboratorytotestourhypothesis.
Wealsocontributetotheliteraturebyshowingthatexposedirmswithhigh-EScoreorhighsustainability-orientedinstitutionalownershipexperiencelowersellingpressure.Incontrast,thesellingpressureisgreaterforexposedirmswithhightotalinstitutionalownership.Theseresultsdeepenourunderstandingoftheroleofi-nancialinstitutionsinpricingphysicalclimaterisk.
2.2.Hypotheses
Ourstudyexaminestheeffectofdisastersonirms’stockandbondreturns.Becausedisasterscouldabruptlyaffectairm’sbusinessoperations,thead-verseimpactofdisasterscouldcauseinvestorstocom-mandahigherexpectedreturnonexposedirms(therisk-compensationhypothesis).Alternatively,invest-orscouldoverreacttothedisasterimpactbydepress-ingtheexposedirm’sstockandbondprices.Aspricesdropbelowthefundamentalvalue,theyreboundinthefollowingmonth(theoverreactionhypothesis).Bothhypothesesleadtothefollowingprediction.
Hypothesis1.Therelationbetweendisastersandone-month-aheadreturnsonstocksandbondsofexposedfirmsispositive.
Thetwoexplanations(overreactionandrationalrisk-compensationhypotheses)arenotnecessarilymutuallyexclusive.Ournexthypothesesattempttoprovideindicationsastowhichexplanationislikelytoplayalargerrole.Thetrueimpactofdisasters(thelossoffundamentalvaluesbecauseofdisasters)
cannotbeimmediatelyobserved.However,asCovalandStafford(
2007
)andotherssuggest,theexpostde-viationbetweenpricesandfundamentalvaluescanprovideuswithanindicationofoverreaction(i.e.,sig-niicantreturnreversalsafterdisasters).IfHypothesis
1
isdrivenbyinvestors’overreaction,thenweexpectthatthecontemporaneousreturnontheexposedirminthemonthofdisasterswillbelower,asitreflectstheoversellingactivityofinvestors(DeBondtandThaler
1985
).Wethusstatethesecondhypothesis,asfollows.
Hypothesis2.Ifinvestorsoverreacttodisasters,thenthecontemporaneousrelationbetweenstock(bond)returnsanddisastersisnegative.
Wealsoexaminethelong-runreturndifferentialbe-tweenexposedandunexposedirms.IftherelationinHypothesis
1
continuesinthelongrun,thenitsuggeststhatinvestorsupdatetheirbeliefabouttheclimateriskofexposedirms,causingthepremiumonexposedirmstobehigherthanunexposedirms.Suchacontin-uationinreturndifferentialwouldbemoreconsistentwiththerisk-compensationhypothesis.
Anotherwaytodeterminewhetherpricesarede-pressedbeyondthefundamentalvalueistoexamineinsidertradingactivities.RozeffandZaman(
1998
)andLou(
2014
)positthat,becauseinsidershavesupe-riorknowledgeabouttheirownirms,insidertradingrevealswhethertheseinsidersbelievetheirstockpri-cesareundervaluedwithouttheneedtomeasurethelosstofundamentalsbecauseofdisasters.Speciically,ifstockpricesareoverlydepressed,theninsidersarebetteroffpurchasingtheirownsharesandtakead-vantageofthetemporarymisvaluation(Hongetal.
2008
).Ontheotherhand,ifinsidersbelievethatstockpricesjustiiablyreflectthelossofirmfundamentalsbecauseofdisasterimpacts,thenwedonotexpecttoseeachangeintheirtradingactivity.
Hypothesis3.Ifinvestorsoverreacttodisasters,theninsiders’sharepurchasesincreasewhentheirfirmisexposedtodisasters.
Theeffectofdisastersonreturnscoulddependoninvestors’attentiontoclimatechange.Priorstudies(Kruegeretal.
2020
,SchlenkerandTaylor
2021
)sug-gestthatinvestorsbegantopayattentiontoclimatechangeriskssincetheearly2000s.Wethereforeexpectthattheeffectofdisasterswouldbemorepronouncedinthelateryearsofoursampleperiod.Painter(
2020
)suggeststhatthepublicationoftheSternReviewin2006isagoodcandidateeventtotestthisattentionef-fect.TheSternReviewwastheirstofitskindtoquantifythecoststoaddressclimatechangeanditsimpactontheglobaleconomy(Stern
2007
).Itattractedextensivemediacoveragearoundtheworldandarousedpublicattentiontoglobalwarming.Indeed,
HuynhandXia:PanicSellingWhenDisasterStrikes
ManagementScience,2023,vol.69,no.12,pp.7448–7467,©2021INFORMS7451
Downloadedfromby[
]on12March2024,at06:22.Forpersonaluseonly,allrightsreserved.
Painter(
2020
)indsthatGooglesearchvolumeforcli-matechangeincreasedsigniicantlyafterthereleaseoftheSternReviewandthatthepricingofclimateriskinthemunicipalbondmarketissigniicantonlyafter2006.Assuch,weconjecturethatinvestors’over-reactiontodisasterswouldbemorepronouncedafter2006.If,however,rationalinvestorsdominatethepricingofdisasters,thentherisk-compensationhypothesiswouldpredicttheeffectofdisastersonre-turnstobesigniicantevenbefore2006.
Hypothesis4.Theeffectofdisastersonstockandbondre-turnsismorepronouncedafter2006.
Takentogether,Hypotheses
2
–
4
,ifsupported,sug-gestthattheeffectofdisastersonstockandbondre-turnsisnotpurelydrivenbytheadverseimpactofdisastersonirms’fundamentals.
Investorshaveheterogenouspreferencestowardsustainability.HongandKacperczyk(
2009
)showthatinvestorsstayawayfrom“sin”stocks.Bakeretal.(
2018
)indthatinvestorsarewillingtoacceptlowerre-turnsongreenbonds.HartzmarkandSussman(
2019
)indthatlow-sustainabilityfundsexperiencesignii-cantoutflows,whereashigh-sustainabilityfundsre-ceivelargeinflowseventhoughtheydonotgeneratehigherreturns,suggestingthatinvestorspreferhigh-sustainabilityfundsfornonpecuniaryreasons.Theseindingsarealsoechoedbyanumberofstudies(Linsetal.
2017
,RiedlandSmeets
2017
,Albuquerqueetal.
2019
,Chowdhryetal.
2019
,Barberetal.
2021
).Fur-thermore,institutionalinvestorswhoareconcernedaboutclimaterisktendtobelong-terminvestorsandsustainability-orientedinvestors(GibsonandKrueger
2018
,Kruegeretal.
2020
).Takentogether,priorre-searchsuggeststhat,ifairmhasastrongenviron-mentalproile,moresustainability-orientedinvestors,andmorelong-terminvestors,itsstockandbondpri-cesarelesslikelytobedepressedafteritishitbydis-asters.Wethereforeproposethefollowinghypothesis.
Hypothesis5.Theeffectofdisastersonreturnsisstron-geramongfirmswithlowenvironmentalperformance,firmswithfewersustainability-orientedinvestors,andfirmswithmoreshort-terminvestors.
3.DataandVariableConstruction3.1.NaturalDisastersandFirms,
EstablishmentData
Wecollectcounty-levelinformationonnaturaldisastereventsintheUnitedStatesfromSHELDUS.Thisdata-basecontainsinformationonthetypeofnaturaldisasterevents,theFederalInformationProcessingStandards(FIPS)codeofaffectedcounties,county-leveldollardamagescausedbyeachtypeofevents,durationofeachtypeofevent,andmonthandyearoftheevent.WefollowBarrotandSauvagnat(
2016
)andselect
disastersthatlastforlessthan30days.Asweknowes-tablishments’counties,wealsoensurethatanestablish-mentisexposedtodisasterbyrequiringthatthetotales-timateddamagetoeachcountyismorethan$10millionin2015constantdollars.Thiscutoffisapproximatelytheminimumaveragedamagecausedbybillion-dollardis-asterstoeachcounty.
7
Weobtaininformationonsubsidiaries,branches,andplantsofmultistateirmsfromtheNETSdatabasebe-tween1990and2015,whichissuppliedbyDunandBradstreet(D&B)andismaintainedbyWallsandAsso-ciates.
8
Foreachestablishment,theNETSdatabasepro-videsauniquepermanentestablishmentidentiier(whichdoesnotchangeevenwhentheestablishmentchangeslocation),historicalinformationonthelocationoftheestablishment(FIPS),sales,andthenumberofemployeesattheestablishmentattheyearlyfrequency.Importantly,theNETSdatabaseisfreefromsurvivor-shipbias.Thatis,ifanestablishmentchangeslocationorwascloseddown,weareabletoobserveitshistoricallocationsthroughoutitslife,theyearofrelocation,anditsirstyearandlastyearofactivebusiness.
WematchestablishmentsintheNETSdatabasewithirmsinCompustatandtheCenterforResearchinSecurityPrices(CRSP)bytheirhistoricallegalnames,supplementedwithcarefulmanualchecking.Asstandardintheliterature,wedonotconsideri-nancialirms(thosewithSICcodes6000-6999)andnoncommonstocks(thosewithCRSPsharecodesdif-ferentfrom10or11).
Ourirstmeasureofairm’sexposuretonaturaldi-sasterisadummyvariable,Disaster,whichisequaltooneifatleastoneoftheirm’sestablishmentsislocatedinacountyhitbynaturaldisastersandzerootherwise.Forthesecondmeasure,weusetheinformationoncounty-leveldisasterdamagesandcomputeairm-levelexposure,Ln(Damage),astheestablishment-weightedaverageoftotaldamagesacrossthecountieswheretheirm’sestablishmentsarelocated,usingestablishments’salesasweight.Ourresultsdonotqualitativelychangewhenweuseestablishmentemploymentasweightorwhenweusea50%/50%combinationofestablishmentsalesandemploymentasweight.
Ourinalsamplecontainsatotalof640,203uniqueestablishments.Onaverage,airminoursamplehas75establishments.Intheonlineappendix,TableIA1,wereporttheyearlyvariationinthepercentageofestablishmentsexposedtonaturaldisastersoutofthetotalnumberofestablishments.
9
Wecanseethatthenumberofexposedestablishmentsvariesoverthesam-pleperiod,reachingatroughof4.8%in1994andapeakof22.9%in1998.
Toobtainasenseofthecross-sectionaldistributionofdisasterimpacts,Figure
1
presentsaheatmapofes-tablishmentsexposedtonaturaldisastersacrossthestates.Itshowsthatdisasterscanaffectany
HuynhandXia:PanicSellingWhenDisasterStrikes
7452ManagementScience,2023,vol.69,no.12,pp.7448–7467,©2021INFORMS
Downloadedfromby[
]on12March2024,at06:22.Forpersonaluseonly,allrightsreserved.
Figure1.(Coloronline)LocationsofEstablishmentsExposedtoNaturalDisastersBetween1990and2015
Notes.Thisfiguredepictstheaveragenumberofestablishmentsthatwereexposedtonaturaldisastersoverthefullsampleperiod.Anestablish-mentisdeemedexposedifitslocalcountyishitbyanaturaldisasterthatcoststhecountyatleast$10millionin2015constantdollars.Ineachyearinagivenstate,wecountthenumberofexposedestablishments.Wethentaketheaveragenumberofexposedestablishmentsacrossyears.Informationonthecounty-levellocationsofestablishmentsisobtainedfromtheNETSdatabase,whereasinformationoncounty-leveldisastersiscollectedfromSHELDUS.
establishmentthroughoutthecontinentalUnitedStatesandnotjustthoseincoastalcounties.Intheon-lineappendix,FigureIA1,weplotsnapshotsofthisheatmap.Wefindthat,althoughCaliforniahasthemostestablishmentsexposedtodisastersoverthefullsampleperiod,disastersdonothitthisstateeveryyear.
10
Giventheunpredictabilitya
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 住宅租房合同范本2024年
- 合同能源管理合作协议2024年
- 2024版棚户区房屋买卖合同
- 2024版房屋买卖居间合同翻译
- 外墙清洗的协议书范本(2024版)
- 签订施工合同必须应当具备的条件2024年
- 2024租赁山场合同
- 2024建筑垃圾买卖简单合同范本
- 2024工程劳务分包合同范本
- 2024年乒乓球聘用教练合同书
- 膳食伙委会会议发言稿
- 七年级《可爱的四川》教学计划打印
- 降低阴式分娩产后出血发生率-PDCA
- 印刷厂年度安全报告5篇,印刷厂安全工作总结
- 音乐分享-赵雷《成都》
- 关于“实干巧干”语文高分作文
- 施工现场平面布置说明
- 计算机网络基础(钱锋) 项目一任务1授课PPT
- 上海市九年义务教育阶段写字等级考试(一级)硬笔方格收写纸
- IT外包服务中断应急演练计划(模板)
- GB/T 39199-2020聚乙烯(PE)塑料再生料的表征特性及检测方法
评论
0/150
提交评论