57fe06903f7ee帮学堂配套电子讲义_第1页
57fe06903f7ee帮学堂配套电子讲义_第2页
57fe06903f7ee帮学堂配套电子讲义_第3页
57fe06903f7ee帮学堂配套电子讲义_第4页
57fe06903f7ee帮学堂配套电子讲义_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩93页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

课程配套讲义是学习的必备资源,帮帮为大家精心整理了高质量的配套讲多造最科学、最高效、最自由的学台:名师TOC\o"1-1"\h\z\u2003年Text 2005年Text 2005年Text 2005年Text 2005年Text 2006年Text 2006年Text 2006年Text 2006年Text 2007年Text 2007年Text 2007年Text 2007年Text 2008年Text 2008年Text 2008年Text 2008年Text 2009年Text 2009年Text 2009年Text 2009年Text 2010年Text 2010年Text 2010年Text 2010年Text ItissaidthatinEnglanddeathispressing,inCanadainevitableandinCaliforniaoptional.Smallwonder.Americans'lifeexpectancyhasnearlydoubledoverthepastcentury.Failinghipscanbereced,clinicaldepressioncontrolled,cataractsremovedina30-minutesurgicalprocedure.SuchadvancesoffertheagingpopulationaqualityoflifethatwasunimaginablewhenIenteredmedicine50yearsago.Butnotevenagreathealth-caresystemcancuredeath—andourfailuretoconfrontthatrealitynowthreatensthisgreatnessofours.Deathisnormal;wearegeneticallyprogrammedtodisintegrateandperish,evenunderidealconditions.Weallunderstandthatatsomelevel,yetasmedicalconsumerswetreatdeathasaproblemtobesolved.Shieldedbythird-partypayersfromthecostofourcare,wedemandeverythingthatcanpossiblybedoneforus,evenifit'suseless.Themostobviousexampleislate-stagecancercare.Physicians—frustratedbytheirinabilitytocurethediseaseandfearinglossofhopeinthepatient—toooftenofferaggressivetreatmentfarbeyondwhatisscientificallyjustified.In1950,theUSspent$12.7billiononhealthcare.In2002,thecostwill$1540billion.Anyonecanseethistrendisunsustainable.Yetfewseemwillingtotrytoreverseit.Somescholarsconcludethataernmentwithfiniteresourcesshouldsimplystoppayingformedicalcarethatsustainslifebeyondacertainage—say83orso.FormerColoradoernorRichardLammhasbeenquotedassayingthattheoldandinfirm"haveadutytodieandgetoutoftheway",sothatyounger,healthierpeoplecanrealizetheirpotential.Iwouldnotgothatfar.Energeticpeoplenowroutinelyworkthroughtheir60sandbeyond,andremaindazzlinglyproductive.At78, chairmanSumnerRedstonejokinglyclaimstobe53.SupremeCourtJusticeSandraDayO'Connorisinher70s,andformersurgeongeneralC.EverettKoopchairsanInternetstart-upinhis80s.Theseleadersarelivingproofthatpreventionworksandthatwecanmanagethehealthproblemsthatcomenaturallywithage.Asamere68-year-old,Iwishtoageasproductivelyastheyhave.Yettherearelimitstowhatasocietycanspendinthispursuit.Asaphysician,Iknowthemostcostlyanddramaticmeasuresmaybeineffectiveandpainful.IalsoknowthatpeopleinJapanandSweden,countriesthatspendfarlessonmedicalcare,haveachievedlonger,healthierlivesthanwehave.Asanation,wemaybeoverfundingthequestforunlikelycureswhileunderfundingresearchonhumblertherapiesthatcouldimprovepeople'slives.WhatisimpliedinthefirstAmericansarebetterpreparedfordeaththanotherAmericansenjoyahigherlifequalitythaneverAmericansareover-confidentoftheirmedicalAmericanstakeavainprideintheirlonglifeTheauthorusestheexampleofcancerpatientstoshow medicalresourcesareoftendoctorsarehelplessagainstfatalsometreatmentsaretoomedicalcosts ingTheauthor'sattitudetowardRichardLamm'sremarkisone strongslightenthusiasticIncontrasttotheUS,JapanandSwedenarefundingtheirmedical.moremoremoremoreThetextintendstoexpresstheidea medicinewillfurtherprolongpeople'slifebeyondacertainlimitisnotworthdeathshouldbeacceptedasafactofexcessivedemandsincreasethecostofhealth【正确解】根据题干信息直接定位至首段第一句。该句提到,“据说在英【干扰项分析】[A]选项“正反”,最后一句表明人比其他国家的人更害怕。[B]选项“正反”,由于医疗技术的进步老年人享受能治愈”。[D]选项“偷换概念”,将“人对医疗技术的过于自信”【正确解】根据题干中的cancerpatients定位至第二段。文章第二段说,“由于有第支付我们的医疗费用,我们常常要求用尽一切可能的医疗手【干扰项分析】[B]和[C]选项属于“例子本身”,是举例中提到的内容,而不是举例的目的。[D]选项是根据第三段前两句介绍的几十年内医疗成【正确解】根据题干中的人名RichardLamm定位到第三段最后一句。该句【干扰项分析】【正确解】根据题干JapanandSweden定位至文章最后一段。第三”,extravagantly是说明情况的。[C]选项“以偏概全”,cautiously【正确解】本题考查考生对文章主旨要义的理解能力。实际上考生只需要把各的句起,本上全就有一个体把握句般落首句末和强折地,这文也不外。一提到在是以选的但是使伟的医卫体系也不治第段,是正现,我的定我即在最想的件也会。第三83岁以上的老人应该停止支付医疗费,老人有责任为年轻人让位第段作自的观不和上段的点样。五,人们应用无而贵长命,应该高活质。此文的中心思是告人接,[选正。不是观点。[B]选项“”,是其他人的观点,作者在第四段已经Everybodylovesafatpayrise.Yetpleasureatyourowncanvanishifyoulearnthatacolleaguehasbeengivenabiggerone.Indeed,ifhehasareputationforslacking,youmightevenbeoutraged.Suchbehaviourisregardedas“alltoohuman”,withtheunderlyingassumptionthatotheranimalswouldnotbecapableofthisfinelydevelopedsenseofgrievance.ButastudybySarahBrosnanandFransdeWaalofEmoryUniversityinAtlanta,Georgia,whichhasjustbeenpublishedinNature,suggeststhatitisalltoomonkey,aswell.Theresearchersstudiedthebehaviouroffemalebrowncapuchinmonkeys.Theylookcute.Theyaregood-natured,co-operativecreatures,andtheysharetheirfoodreadily.Aboveall,liketheirfemalehumancounterparts,theytendtopaymuchcloserattentiontothevalueof“goodsandservices”thanmales.SuchcharacteristicsmakethemperfectcandidatesforDr.Brosnan’sandDr.deWaal’sstudy.Theresearchersspenttwoyearsteachingtheirmonkeystoexchangetokensforfood.Normally,themonkeyswerehappyenoughtoexchangepiecesofrockforslicesofcucumber.However,whentwomonkeyswerecedinseparatebutadjoiningchambers,sothateachcouldobservewhattheotherwasgettinginreturnforitsrock,theirbehaviourbecamemarkedlydifferent.Intheworldofcapuchinsgrapesareluxurygoods(andmuchpreferabletocucumbers).Sowhenonemonkeywashandedagrapeinexchangeforhertoken,thesecondwasreluctanttohandhersoverforamerepieceofcucumber.Andifonereceivedagrapewithouthavingtoprovidehertokeninexchangeatall,theothereithertossedherowntokenattheresearcheroroutofthechamber,orrefusedtoacceptthesliceofcucumber.Indeed,themerepresenceofagrapeintheotherchamber(withoutanactualmonkeytoeatit)wasenoughtoinduceresentmentinafemalecapuchin.Theresearcherssuggestthatcapuchinmonkeys,likehumans,areguidedbysocialemotions.Inthewild,theyareaco-operative,group-livingspecies.Suchco-operationislikelytobestableonlywheneachanimalfeelsitisnotbeingcheated.Feelingsofrighteousindignation,itseems,arenotthepreserveofpeoplealone.Refusingalesserrewardcompleymakesthesefeelingsabundantlycleartoothermembersofthegroup.However,whethersuchasenseoffairnessevolvedindependentlyincapuchinsandhumans,orwhetheritstemsfromthecommonancestorthatthespecieshad35millionyearsago,is,asyet,anunansweredquestion.Intheopeningparagraph,theauthorintroduceshistopic posingajustifyinganmakingaexiningaThestatement“itisalltoomonkey”(Lastline,Paragraphl)implies monkeysarealsooutragedbyslackresentingunfairnessisalsomonkeys’monkeys,likehumans,tendtobelousofeachnoanimalsotherthanmonkeyscandevelopsuchFemalecapuchinmonkeyswerechosenfortheresearchmostprobablybecausetheyare moreinclinedtoweighwhattheyniceinbothappearanceandmoregenerousthantheirmaleDr.BrosnanandDr.deWaalhaveeventuallyfoundintheirstudythatthe prefergrapestocanbetaughttoexchangewillnotbecooperativeiffeelingareunhappywhenseparatedfromWhatcanweinferfromthelastMonkeyscanbetrainedtodevelopsocialHumanindignationevolvedfromanuncertainAnimalsusuallyshowtheirfeelingsopenlyashumansCooperationamongmonkeysremainsstableonlyinthe【干扰项分析】[A]contrast(对照)强调的是两个事物之间的不同点,而comparison(比较)强调的是两个事物之间的相同点或者相似SarahBrosnanFransdeWaal进行的一项研究表明,它也是【正确项详解】第一段开头主要讲了人遇到会,这被看作是“人之竟然比你的薪水高”而不是“他的懒惰”,概括起来说就是人们会对于的【正确项详解】从第二段中可知:它们又可爱,又温顺,还很配合。但是,最主要的原因是:Aboveall,liketheirfemalehumancounterparts,theytendtopaymuchcloserattentiontothevalueof“goodsandservices”thanmales.最重要的BrosnandeWaal博士理想的研究对象。故选[A],属于典型的“同义替换”,其中moreinclinedtoweigh同义替换文tendtopaymuchcloserattention,whattheygetthevalueofgoodsandservices。【干扰项分析】[B]选项属于“无中生有”,“关注研究人员的指令”在文因。[D]theysharetheirfoodreadily设置干扰项,属【正确项详解】根据题干Dr.BrosnanandDr.deWaalhaveeventuallyfound【干扰项分析】[A]选项,猴子“喜欢葡萄甚于黄瓜”,是事实,不是研究是研究结论;[D]选项,猴子“如果与其他猴子分开,就会不高兴”文中从3500万年前他们共同的祖先,这个问题至今还没有答案。【干扰项分析】[A]选项属于典型的“无中生有”,文章中说猴子会受到社说的是:只有当每只猴子感到自己没有受到时,这种合作才可能稳定,而不Doyourememberallthoseyearswhenscientistsarguedthatsmokingwouldkillusbutthedoubtersinsistedthatwedidn’tknowforsure?Thattheevidencewasinconclusive,thescienceuncertain?Thattheantismokinglobbywasouttodestroyourwayoflifeandtheernmentshouldstayoutoftheway?LotsofAmericansboughtthatnonsense,andoverthreedecades,some10millionsmokerswenttoearlyThereareupsettingparallelstoday,asscientistsinonewaveafteranothertrytoawakenustothegrowingthreatofglobalwarming.ThelatestwasapanelfromtheNationalAcademyofSciences,enlistedbytheWhiteHouse,tolusthattheEarth’satmosphereisdefiniywarmingandthattheproblemislargelyman-made.Theclearmessageisthatweshouldgetmovingtoprotectourselves.TheoftheNationalAcademy,BruceAlberts,addedthiskeypointintheprefacetothepanel’sreport:“Scienceneverhasalltheanswers.Butsciencedoesprovideuswiththebestavailableguidetothefuture,anditiscriticalthatournationandtheworldbaseimportantpoliciesonthebestjudgmentsthatsciencecanprovideconcerningthefutureconsequencesofpresentactions.”Justasonsmoking,voicesnowcomefrommanyquartersinsistingthatthescienceaboutglobalwarmingis plete,thatit’sOKtokeeppouringfumesintotheairuntilweknowforsure.Thisisadangerousgame:bythetime100percentoftheevidenceisin,itmaybetoolate.Withtherisksobviousandgrowing,aprudentpeoplewouldtakeoutaninsurancenow.Fortunay,theWhiteHouseisstartingtopayattention.Butit’sobviousthatamajorityofthe’sadvisersstilldon’ttakeglobalwarmingseriously.Insteadofanofaction,theycontinuetopressformoreresearch—aclassiccaseof“paralysisbyysis”.Toserveasresponsiblestewardsofthenet,wemustpressforwardondeeperatmosphericandoceanicresearch.Butresearchaloneisinadequate.IftheAdministrationwon’ttakethelegislativeinitiative,Congressshouldhelptobeginfashioningconservationmeasures.AbillbyDemocraticSenatorRobertByrdofVirginia,whichwouldofferfinancialincentivesforprivateindustry,isapromisingstart.Manyseethatthecountryisgettingreadytobuildlotsofnewpowerntstomeetourenergyneeds.Ifweareevergoingtoprotecttheatmosphere,itiscrucialthatthosenewntsbeenvironmentallysound.Anargumentmadebysupportersofsmokingwas therewasnoscientificevidenceofthecorrelationbetweensmokingandthenumberofearlydeathsofsmokersinthepastdecadeswaspeoplehad domtochoosetheirownwayofantismokingpeoplewereusuallytalkingAccordingtoBruceAlberts,sciencecanserve aaaaWhatdoestheauthormeanby“paralysisbyysis”(Lastline,ParagraphEndlessstudieskillCarefulinvestigationrevealsPrudentnninghindersExtensiveresearchhelpsdecision-Accordingtotheauthor,whatshouldtheAdministrationdoaboutglobalOfferaidtobuildcleanerpowerRaisepublicawarenessofPressforfurtherscientificTakesomelegislativeTheauthorassociatestheissueofglobalwarmingwiththatofsmoking theybothsufferedfrom ernment'salessonfromthelatterisapplicabletothe eofthelatteraggravatesthebothofthemhaveturnedfrombadtosupportersofsmokingdoubters快速凿,科学也不确定,吸烟的会破坏他们的生活方式,要置身事外。的人说吸烟和之间的关系还不确定,并不是说二者之间的联系没有科学证据,故[A]选项错误。[B]选项属于典型的“正反”。文中第一段最后型的“”的错误,nonsense在文中指的是支持吸烟的人的观点,而不是【正确项详解】根据题干中的人名信息快速定位到第二段最后两句话。为我们以后做决策时的指导。[D]选项为斯·观点的“概括性”总和critical设置的形近词干扰项,但都不是斯·的观点,所以都应排【正确项详解】根据题干信息快速精确定位到第四段。paralysis ysis位【干扰项分析】[B]选项属于典型的“无中生有”,在原文中并没有相对应并且progress(发展)并确,[C]也不是正确选项。[D]选项中的extensiveresearch符合 ysis的意思,而helpsdecisionmaking在原文中并没有出现,Administration的信息快速精确定位到最后一段。制定保护措施。换句话说,就是应采取一些措施。[D]选项中的takesomelegislativemeasurestakethelegislativeinitiative。因此[D]【干扰项分析】[A]选项属于典型的“推理过度”,原文中只是要确保这些新发电厂对环境无害,而没有说为修建清洁电厂提供帮助,故为错误选项。[B]选项属于典型的“无中生有”,是命题者利用考生的设置的干扰【干扰项分析】[A]选项属于典型的“偷换概念”,将文中的doubters偷换为[A]theernment,故错误。[C]、[D]选项都属于“无中生Ofallthecomponentsofagoodnight’ssleep,dreamsseemtobeleastwithinourcontrol.Indreams,awindowopensintoaworldwherelogicissuspendedanddeadpeoplespeak.Acenturyago,Freudformulatedhisrevolutionarytheorythatdreamswerethedisguisedshadowsofourunconsciousdesiresandfears;bythelate1970s,neurologistshadswitchedtothinkingofthemasjust“mentalnoise”—therandombyproductsoftheneural-repairworkthatgoesonduringsleep.Nowresearchersthatdreamsarepartofthemind’semotionalthermostat,regulatingmoodswhilethebrainis“off-line.”Andoneleadingauthoritysaysthattheseintenselypowerfulmentaleventscanbenotonlyharnessedbutactuallybroughtunderconsciouscontrol,tohelpussleepandfeelbetter.“It’syourdream,”saysRosalindCartwright,chairofpsychologyatChicago’sMedicalCenter.“Ifyoudon’tlikeit,changeit.”Evidencefrombrainimagingsupportsthisview.ThebrainisasactiveduringREM(rapideyemovement)sleep—whenmostvividdreamsoccur—asitiswhenfullyawake,saysDr.EricNofzingerattheUniversityofPittsburgh.Butnotallpartsofthebrainareequallyinvolved;thelimbicsystem(the“emotionalbrain”)isespeciallyactive,whiletheprefrontalcortex(thecenterofinlectandreasoning)isrelativelyquiet.“Wewakeupfromdreamshappyordepressed,andthosefeelingscanstaywithusallday,”saysStanfordsleepresearcherDr.WilliamDement.ThelinkbetweendreamsandemotionsshowsupamongthepatientsinCartwright’sclinic.Mostpeopleseemtohavemorebaddreamsearlyinthenight,progressingtowardhappieronesbeforeawakening,suggestingthattheyareworkingthroughnegativefeelingsgeneratedduringtheday.Becauseourconsciousmindisoccupiedwithdailylifewedon’talwaysthinkabouttheemotionalsignificanceoftheday’sevents—until,itappears,webegintodream.Andthisprocessneednotbelefttotheunconscious.Cartwrightbelievesonecanexerciseconsciouscontroloverrecurringbaddreams.Assoonasyouawaken,identifywhatisupsettingaboutthedream.Visualizehowyouwouldlikeittoendinstead;thenexttimeitoccurs,trytowakeupjustenoughtocontrolitscourse.Withmuchpracticepeoplecanlearnto,lilly,doitintheirAttheendoftheday,there’sprobablylittlereasontopayattentiontoourdreamsatallunlesstheykeepusfromsleeor“wewakeupinapanic,”Cartwrightsays.Terrorism,economicuncertaintiesandgeneralfeelingsofinsecurityhaveincreasedpeople’sanxiety.Thosesufferingfrompersistentnightmaresshouldseekhelpfromathe.Fortherestofus,thebrainhasitswaysofworkingthroughbadfeelings.Sleep—orratherdream—onitandyou’llfeelbetterinthemorning.Researchershavecometobelievethat canbemodifiedintheiraresusceptibletoemotionalreflectourinnermostdesiresandarea eofneuralByreferringtothelimbicsystem,theauthorintendsto itsfunctioninourthemechanismofREMtherelationofdreamstoitsdifferencefromtheprefrontalThenegativefeelingsgeneratedduringthedaytend aggravateinourunconsciousdevelopintohappypersisttillthetimewefallshowupindreamsearlyatCartwrightseemstosuggest wakingupintimeisessentialtotheriddingofbadvisualizingbaddreamshelpsbringthemunderdreamsshouldbelefttotheirnaturaldreamingmaynotentirelybelongtotheWhatadvicemightCartwrightgivetothosewhosometimeshavebadLeadyourlifeasSeekprofessionalExerciseconsciousAvoidanxietyintheresearchers快速精确定位到第一段的后四句。上还可以有意识地加以控制。心理科罗莎琳德·卡特莱特说:“梦是你自己【干扰项分析】[B]选项属于典型的“正反”。虽然梦易受情绪的影响是个,但原文中所给的信息为“梦可以调控我们的情绪”,故[B]选项错误。[C]选项属于典型的“”,“反应我们内心的和恐惧”是弗除。[D]选项同样属于“”,“梦是神经修复的随机结果”是20世纪70年代学家的观点,并不是现代学家的观点,同样为错误选项。段第一句ThelinkbetweendreamsandemotionsshowsupamongthepatientsinCartwright'sclinic.(梦和情绪之间的联系也表现在卡特莱特诊所的身上),再seemtohavemorebaddreamsearlyinthenight的“同义替换”。dreaming替换thisprocess,而maynotentirelybelongtotheunconsciousneednotbelefttotheunconscious。upjustenoughtocontrolitscourse,但并没有强调这是至关重要的,因此[A]错误。[B]Visualizehowyouwouldlikeittoend设置的干扰属于典型的“偷换概念”,是错误的。[C]选项也属于典型的“正反”,如在should后加一个not,则[C]就是正确的了。【正确项详解】根据题干信息快速精确定位到最后一段。该段:那些长期受【干扰项分析】[B]选项“寻求专业帮助”的建议是给那些经常受噩梦折磨以是错误的。[C]选项的内容是卡的观点,而不是她对有时做噩梦的人Americansnolongerexpectpublicfigures,whetherinspeechorinwriting,tocommandtheEnglishlanguagewithskillandgift.Nordotheyaspiretosuchcommandthemselves.Inhislatestbook,ngOurOwnThing:TheDegradationofLanguageandMusicandWhyWeShould,Like,Care,JohnMcWhorter,alinguistandcontroversialistofmixedliberalandconservativeviews,seesthetriumphof1960scounter-cultureasresponsibleforthedeclineofformalEnglish.Blamingthepermissive1960sisnothingnew,butthisisnotyetanothercriticismagainstthedeclineineducation.Mr.McWhorter’sacademicspecialtyislanguagehistoryandchange,andheseesthegradualdisappearanceof“whom”,forexample,tobenaturalandnomoreregrettablethanthelossofthecase-endingsofOldEnglish.Butthecultoftheauthenticandtheal,“ngourownthing”,hasspeltthedeathofformalspeech,writing,poetryandmusic.Whileeventhemodestlyeducatedsoughtanelevatedtonewhentheyputpentopaperbeforethe1960s,eventhemostwellregardedwritingsincethenhassoughttocapturespokenEnglishonthepage.Equally,inpoetry,thehighlyal,performativegenreistheonlyformthatcouldclaimrealliveliness.InbothoralandwrittenEnglish,talkingistriumphingoverspeaking,spontaneityovercraft.Illustratedwithanentertainingarrayofexamplesfrombothhighandlowculture,thetrendthatMr.McWhortersisunmistakable.Butitislessclear,totakethequestionofhissubtitle,whyweshould,like,care.Asalinguist,heacknowledgesthatallvarietiesofhumanlanguage,includingnon-standardoneslikeBlackEnglish,canbepowerfullyexpressive—thereexistsnolanguageordialectintheworldthatcannotconveycomplexideas.Heisnotarguing,asmanydo,thatwecannolongerthinkstraightbecausewedonottalkproper.Russianshaveadeeplovefortheirownlanguageandcarrylargechunksofmemorizedpoetryintheirheads,whileItalianpoliticianstendtoelaboratespeechthatwouldseemold-fashionedtomostEnglish-speakers.Mr.McWhorteracknowledgesthatformallanguageisnotstrictlynecessary,andproposesnoradicaleducationreforms—heisreallygrievingoverthelossofsomethingbeautifulmorethanuseful.WenowtakeourEnglish“onpapertesinsteadof ”.Ashame,perhaps,butprobablyaninevitableone.AccordingtoMcWhorter,thedeclineofformal isinevitableinradicaleducationisbutalltoonaturalinlanguagehascausedthecontroversyoverthecounter-broughtaboutchangesinpublicattitudesintheTheword“talking”(Line6,Paragraph3) TowhichofthefollowingstatementswouldMcWhortermostlikelyLogicalthinkingisnotnecessarilyrelatedtothewayweBlackEnglishcanbemoreexpressivethanstandardNon-standardvarietiesofhumanlanguagearejustasOfallthevarieties,standardEnglishcanbestconveycomplexThedescriptionofRussians’loveofmemorizingpoetryshowsthe interestintheirappreciationoftheiradmirationfortheircontemptfortheirold-Accordingtothelastparagraph,“papertes”isto“” “temporary”isto“radical”isto“functional”isto “humble”istothedeclineofformalEnglish快速精确定位退是自然的,如“whom”一词的。因此[B]选项为正确答案,为典型的isbutalltoonatural替换了原文中的tobenaturalandnomoreregrettable。alltoo表示“太……”【干扰项分析】[A]选项的信息为“正式英语的在激进的教育中是不可避免的”,但定位段没有提到“激进的教育”。而最后一段提到“激进的教育”时所指的信息为“没有必要进行激进的教育来挽救正式英语的属于典型的“因果倒置”,将文中的信息“2060年代反文化潮流的胜利要为正式英语的负责”错误改写为[C]选项的“正式英语的对反文在口语还是在语中,都表现出了正式英语的和非正式英语的流行。其中speakingcrafttalkingspontaneity对应着非正式英语,【干扰项分析】[A]、[B]、[C]talking出现的第三段主要讨论的是正式英语和非正式英语,故这三项都不能体现talking【干扰项分析】原文信息:所有类型的人类语言,其中包括英语这样Inspiteof“endlesstalkofdifference,”Americansocietyisanamazingforhomogenizingpeople.Thereis“thedemocratizinguniformityofdressanddiscourse,andthecasualnessandabsenceofdeference”characteristicofpopularculture.Peopleareabsorbedinto“acultureofconsumption”launchedbythe19th-centurydepartmentstoresthatoffered“vastarraysofgoodsinanelegantatmosphere.Insteadofintimateshopscateringtoaknowledgeableelite,”thesewerestores“anyonecouldenter,regardlessofclassorbackground.Thisturnedshopintoapublicanddemocraticact.”Themassmedia,advertisingandsportsaresforImmigrantsarequicklyfittingintothiscommonculture,whichmaynotbealtogetherelevatingbutishardlypoisonous.WritingfortheNationalImmigrationForum,GregoryRodriguezreportsthattoday’simmigrationisneitheratunprecedentedlevelsnorresistanttoassimilation.In1998immigrantswere9.8percentofpopulation;in1900,13.6percent.Inthe10yearspriorto1990,3.1immigrantsarrivedforevery1,000residents;inthe10yearspriorto1890,9.2forevery1,000.Now,considerthreeindicesofassimilation—language,homeownershipandintermarriage.The1990Censusrevealedthat“amajorityofimmigrantsfromeachofthefifteenmostcommoncountriesoforiginspokeEnglish‘well’or‘verywell’aftertenyearsofresidence.”ThechildrenofimmigrantstendtobebilingualandproficientinEnglish.“Bythethirdgeneration,theoriginallanguageislostinthemajorityofimmigrantfamilies.”HencethedescriptionofAmericaasa“graveyard”forlanguages.By1996foreign-bornimmigrantswhohadarrivedbefore1970hadahomeownershiprateof75.6percent,higherthanthe69.8percentrateamongnative-bornAmericans.Foreign-bornAsiansandHispanics“havehigherratesofintermarriagethandoU.S.-bornwhitesandblacks.”Bythethirdgeneration,onethirdofHispanicwomenaremarriedtonon-Hispanics,and41percentofAsian-Americanwomenaremarriedtonon-Asians.RodrigueznotesthatchildreninremotevillagesaroundtheworldarefansofsuperstarslikeArnoldSchwarzeneggerandGarthBrooks,yet“someAmericansfearthatimmigrantslivingwithintheUnitedStatesremainsomehowimmunetothenation’sassimilativepower.”AretheredivisiveissuesandpocketsofseethingangerinAmerica?Indeed.Itisbigenoughtohaveabitofeverything.ButparticularlywhenviewedagainstAmerica’sturbulentpast,today’ssocialindiceshardlysuggestadarkanddeterioratingsocialTheword“homogenizing”(Line2,Paragraph1)mostprobably.Accordingtotheauthor,thedepartmentstoresofthe19th [A]yedaroleinthespreadofpopularbecameintimateshopsforcommonsatisfiedtheneedsofaknowledgeableoweditsemergencetothecultureofThetextsuggeststhatimmigrantsnowinthe areresistanttoexertagreatinfluenceonAmericanarehardlyathreattothecommonconstitutethemajorityofthe areArnold Paragraph5?ToprovetheirpopularityaroundtheTorevealthepublic’sfearofTogiveexamplesofsuccessfulToshowthepowerfulinfluenceofAmericanIntheauthor’sopinion,theabsorptionofimmigrantsintoAmericansociety 答案:【正确项详解】根据题干快速精确定位到第一段第一句。此句“Inspiteof‘endlesstalkofdifference,’Americansocietyisanamazingmachineforhomogenizingpeople.”inspiteof表示让步关系,也就是前者与主句之间是转折关系,differencehomogenizingdifference的意思相反,由此可猜测homogenizing的意思。而且在第二段中,作者反复用到assimilation,它与homogenizing相照应,则[C]选项为正确答案。【干扰项分析】其他选项都是命题人“无中生有”添加的干扰项,在原文中没有答案:19世纪百货商店发起的“消费文化”中,这些百货商店在优雅的环境中项为[A],该选项是对原文信息launchedacultureofconsumptionturnedshopintoapublicanddemocraticact的“概括性”论述。shopsintimateshops,因此是错误的。根据原文信息,满足知识精英阶层19世纪的百货商店,故[C]选项也是错误是“1919世纪百货 数并没有表明社会环境的和。由此可知,选项[C]为正确选项,选项hardlyathreat为原文第二段首句中的hardlypoisonous的“同义替换”。选项将原文today‘simmigrationisneitheratunprecedentedlevelsnorresistanttoassimilation中的norresistanttoassimilation改为resistanttohomogenization,故 而不是[B]选项的“对文化施加了很大的影响”。从第二段可以发现,移民只占了人口的很小的一部分,而没有构成人口的大多数,因此,[D]选答案:活在的没有对民族同化免疫,也就是说文化有强大,故[D]【干扰项分析】[A]选项是客观事实,例子本身说的就是他们在全世界很受 接下来的段落对此论点进行论证。在论证过程中,作者用到了amazing,democratizingquicklyfittingintomaynotbealtogetherelevatinghardlypoisonous,hardlysuggestadarkanddeterioratingsocialenvironment等词句,并在文章最后,没有导致社会的或。这些都表现出作者认为美国社会对的吸收是成功的,因此[B]为正确答案。[A]选项错误。[C]、[D]两项与整个文章的感彩是相反的,因此都Stratford-on-Avon,asweallknow,hasonlyoneindustry—WilliamShakespeare—buttherearetwodistinctlyseparateandincreasinglyhostilebranches.ThereistheRoyalShakespeare(RSC),whichpresentssuperbproductionsoftheysattheShakespeareMemorialTheatreontheAvon.Andtherearethetownsfolkwholargelyliveoffthetouristswhocome,nottoseetheys,buttolookatAnneHathaway’sCottage,Shakespeare’sbirthceandtheothersights.TheworthyresidentsofStratforddoubtthatthetheatreaddsapennytotheirrevenue.TheyfranklydisliketheRSC’sactors,themwiththeirlonghairandbeardsandsandalsandnoisiness.It’salldeliciouslyironicwhenyouconsiderthatShakespeare,whoearnstheirliving,washimselfanactor(withabeard)anddidhisshareofnoise-making.Thetouriststreamsarenotentirelyseparate.Thesightseerswhocomebybus—andoftentakeinWarwickCastleandBlenheimPalaceontheside—don’tusuallyseetheys,andsomeofthemareevensurprisedtofindatheatreinStratford.However,theygoersdomanagealittlesight-seeingalongwiththeirygoing.Itistheygoers,theRSCcontends,whobringinmuchofthetown’srevenuebecausetheyspendthenight(someofthemfourorfivenights)pouringcashintothehosandrestaurants.Thesightseerscantakeineverythingandgetoutoftownbynightfall.Thetownsfolkdon’tseeitthiswayandlocalcouncildoesnotcontributedirectlytothesubsidyoftheRoyalShakespeare.Stratfordcriespoortraditionally.Neverthelesseveryhointownseemstobeaddinganewwingorcocktaillounge.Hiltonisbuildingitsownhothere,whichyoumaybesurewillbedecoratedwithHamletHamburgerBars,theLearLounge,theBanquoBanquetingRoom,andsoforth,andwillbeveryexpensive.Anyway,thetownsfolkcan’tunderstandwhytheRoyalShakespeareneedsasubsidy.(ThetheatrehasbrokenattendancerecordsforthreeyearsinaLastyearits1,431seatswere94per

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论