




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
CH-17Shareholders4个1)oppressiveorunfairstatutoryderivativeactiononbehalfofthecoy:windinguporderstatutoryinjunction做题时只需选(1)或(2),若不确定则1,2都写,3,4只需一句话带过。还可用:s461或s1324UnderCorporationsAct,directorsownthedutytocoy.Applytothefactofthecase,directorbreachedhisduty,but donotwanttotakeactionagainsthim.Thenmemberscanseekremediesunders232orstatutoryderivativeactiononbehalfofcoyunders236(1).Oppressive/unfairconduct:s232S232provideremedytomembersiftheconductofthecoy:1)contrarytotheinterestofthemembersasawhole;or2)oppressive,unfairlyprejudicialto,orunfairlydiscriminatoryagainst,amemberofIssueone:canxxapplys232totaketheS234setoutamemberorapastmemberiftheapplicationrelatestothecircumstancesinwhichtheyceasedtobeamember(ifthereasonyoucominingisthatwhyyouremovedfromregisteredshareholder).Amembercanapplyfors232remedyevenifhewasnotaffectedbytheoppressiveorunfairconductofthecoy(ReSpargosMiningNL).Sounders234wecanconcludethatxxcantakeactionunders232IssueTwo:IsthisthetypeofbehaviorforwhichtheremedyisTheaffairsofabodycorporatearedefinedins53inextremelybroadtermsandbriefly,wecanconcludethatanythingtodowiththecoyiscoy’saffairs.Isolated thesingleresolutionoftheboardofdirectorscouldbeanoppressiveorunfairactbehalfofthecoy.WaydevNSWRugbyProposedactions-------Unders232(b),anapplicantmayalsoobtainaremedywheretheactismerelyproposedandhasnotyetoccurred unders232(b),thereisanomissionwherecoyrefusedtodosthshareholderswantwhereacoywithsufficientprofitspersistentlyrefusestopaydividendsSanfordvSanfordCourierServicearefusalbythedirectorstoregisteratransferofsharesReSmithandFawcett抄:Ageneralruletojudgewhethertheconductofcoyisoppressiveorunfairornot,namelyreasonabledirectortest,statesthatadirector'sconductmayberegardedasoppressiveorunfairifnoreasonabledirectorwouldhaveactedinthatway(applyinWaydevNSWRugbyLeaguecase)Inadditiontogeneralrulewealsoconsidertwootherelementstojudgecoy’sconductBalancingInterests:indeterminingwhetherornotconductisoppressiveorunfairacourtmustbalancetheinginterestsofmajorityandminorityshareholders.Itisachievedbyexaminingthebackgroundofacoyandthereasonableexpectationofitsshareholders.---ReSpargosMiningNLDisgruntledshareholders:itisnotnecessarilyunfairifthemajorityshareholdersrefusetobuytheminority'sshares---ReGJeffrey(MensStore)Pty各种情况:(meaningofoppressive/divisionofcorporateopportunityforthemselvesorassociates:CookvDeeks,theconductofcoy’saffairisoppressiveorunfairagainstminorityshareholders,andminorityshareholderscanseekremediesunders232divisionofprofits:Applythefactsonxxxcase,themajorityactoppressivelyorunfairlywhereminorityshareholdersareexcludedfrombeingdirectorsandasignificantproportionoftheprofitsarepaidintheformofhighdirectors'feesandlowdividendstoshareholders,minorityshareholderscanseekremediesunders232-----SanfordvSanfordCourierService(完全没分dividends---divertingbusinessawayfromthecoyandpayhighsalariesbutrefusetopaydividends)----ShamsallahHoldings:profitincrease,dividendnotincreaseaccordinglybutbonusandsalaryincreaseallthetime.---Morganv45FlersAvenue(反例,分了一些dividendsthecourtheldthatthemerefacttopaylowdividendwasnotnecessarilyanindicationofunfairness。further,adecisionbythedirectorstopaythemselveslargebonusesandfeeswasnotoppressiveorunfairifthecoy'sprofitabilityhadincreasedsignificantlybecauseoftheirenterprise)Exclusionfrommanagement:IfCorunafamilybusinessitmaybeoppressiveorunfairparticularfamilymemberfromthe ’smanagement.FexutoPtyvBosnjakHoldingsPtyDirectors’failuretoactininterestofcoy(ofinterest):--MIcanapplyforremedyunders232ifthedirectorbreachedhisdutytoavoidofinterestandpreventedcoyfromsuinghim:ReSparegosMiningNLSharesissuedforanimproperpurpose:Directors,asmajorityshareholders,ratifytheirimproperactionsonshareissue.Suchactionwasoppressiveorunfairandminorityshareholderscanseekremediesunders232:HannesvMJH(ReDalkeithInvestmentsPty:dilutingsomeother'ssharesisissuingsharesforimproperpurpose)(1.courtcanordertochangecoy’sconsti.ToremoveD’sabsolutecontroloverthevoting;2.Dcannotratifyhisownbreachofduty,onlyratifiedbydisinterestedSHs)IssueThree:whatremediesareavailableunderXxwhoiscoveredunders232canapplyforthecourtorderunderUsually,courtordersoppressorbuyoppresee’ssharesatfairvalue:s233(1)(d)Inaddition,membercanalsoapplytocourtfororderofwoundup[s233(1)(a)];alterconstitution[s233(1)(b)];ordercoysued[s233(1)(f)&(1)(g)];injunctiontodo/nottodo[s233(1)(i)&(1)(j)](具体见p624)StatutoryderivativeactionPt2F.1A—s statutoryderivativeactionisseparatefroms232,andshareholdercanchooseoneoranotherbutcouldnotchoosebothofthem.S236enablemembersandofficerstobringproceedingsonbehalfofthecoywherethecoyisunwillingorunabletodosoitself.IssueOne:Canxxbringthisunders236,the smaybringproceedingsonbehalfofacoy:(具体见membersorformermembersormembersofrelatedbodypresentorformerdirectorsandofficersoftheTherefore,underthecircumstanceofthecase,xxcantakeactiononbehalfoftheMoreover,unders236(1)(b),the whowantstobringproceedingsmustobtainleavefromthecourtbeforecommencingaproceedingonbehalfofacoyorinterveninginproceedingstowhichthecoyisapartyIssueTwo:doseapplicationforleavesatisfyallcriteriaunderThecourtmustgrantanapplicationforleaveifitissatisfiedthateachofthefollowingrequirementsunders237(2)aremet:(以下五点都必须满足) CharltonvBaberitisprobablethatthecoywillnotitselfbringtheproceedings--(Applytothefactsofthecase,shareholdersputresolutionaboutinstitutingaproceedingonAGM,butresolutiondidn'tpass.Itindicatesthatcoywillnotitselftakeaction)theapplicantisactingingoodfaith--(apply:xxshowsthattheyhonestlybelievedthatacauseofactionexistsandhasreasonableprospectsofitisinthebestinterestofthecoythatapplicantbegrantedleave--thereisaseriousquestiontobetried--(toshowthatthereisatleastaprobabilitythatthelegalproceedingsinthenameofcoywilltheapplicantgavenoticetothecoyatleast14daysbeforemakingapplicationtoapplyforleaveoritisappropriatewithoutnotice-s237(2)(e)IssueThree:DoseratificationmakeeffecttopreventbringingproceedingsagainstIfdirectordosenotcontrolshareholders,thecourtwouldrecognizeratificationisvalid,thereforewillnotgrantleaves239(1)providethatratificationdosenotpreventa frombringingproceedingsonbehalfofthecoyorapplyingforleavetodoso.Butunders239(2)thecourtmaytakeratificationintoaccountindecidingwhatultimateorderitshouldmakeIfdirectorcontrolshareholders’meeting,courtwouldignoreratification,andgrantleaveallowingminorityshareholderstotakeactionsagainstthedirectorsonbehalfofthecoy.S242coypayalllegalActually,factsaresatisfiedwithbothoppressiveremediesandStatutoryDerivationAct,whichoneyouchoosedependedonwhatremediesyouwouldlike.Unders232,remedygoestoshareholders,butunderSDA,remedygoestothe (anactiontoenrightofacoy)Inadditiontos232andstatutoryderivativeaction,thecourtcanorderaninjunctiontorestrainsb’scontraventionsoftheCA,orthecourtcanorder todoanyactorthingunders1324.firstly,canprovethattheactofdirectorshascontravenedtheCA.Secondly,asamemberwhoseinterestaffectedbytheactofthedirectorsgobeyondthemereinterestsofmembersofthepublic.(IssueOne:IsthereacontraventionofCorporationstheconductthatisregardedascriminaloffenceunderbreachoftheCAthatisnotacriminaloffence,suchass256contraventionofasectionofCAthatisdesignatedcivilpenalty注:Except---s1324dosenotapplytoconductthatmerelycontravenesaprovisioninacoy'sconstitutionorrr.So,wecanconcludethatxxhascontravenedtheIssueTwo:whocanapplyforstatutoryinjunctionundersOnlyASICora whoseinterestshavebeenaffectedbytheconductcanapplytothecourtforans1324injunctionShareholders:BHPCovBellCreditors:AirpeakPtyvJetstreamApplytofactsontheBHPcase,courtrequirethattheapplicantmustestablishthattheirinterestsgobeyondthemereinterestsofmembersofthepublic.Butneednotprovethatshareholderssufferedanyspecialinjuryarisingfromthecontravention,andneednotshowcontraventionaffectshareholderscapacityasmembersAcontraventionoftheCAistakentoaffecttheinterestsofacreditorormemberofacoyif:满足以下两点中的一点:(seep489)theinsolvencyofthecoyisanelementofthecontraventionthecoycontravenesthesharebuy-back,financialassistanceorsharecapitalreductionprovisionscontainedinss257A,260Aand256B,respectively-s1324(1A)Windingup(courtwillnotmakeawindinguporderunders461eifsomeotheravailableremedy)Directoractintheirowninterests Unders461ethecourtmaywindupa ifdirectorshaveactedintheirowninterestsratherthanintheinterestsofthemembersasawhole,orinanyoth
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 公路养护劳务合同范本
- 防冰冻防滑知识
- 家电套购协议合同范本
- 建筑辅料 配送合同范本
- 蛋糕批发转让合同范本
- 个人租房借款合同范本
- 车贷款抵押合同范本
- 机器安装服务合同范本
- 开石施工合同范本
- 二零二五食堂档口承包的合同
- 四川省南充市2025届高三下学期高考适应性考试化学试题(二诊)(原卷版+解析版)
- 某建筑劳务分包有限公司项目管理手册
- 2025年上半年全国总工会部分所属事业单位公开招聘重点基础提升(共500题)附带答案详解
- 地理课程跨学科主题学习的问题与对策
- 2024年国家发改委直属单位招聘考试真题
- 2025年无锡工艺职业技术学院单招职业技能测试题库附答案
- 2025年长春职业技术学院单招职业技能考试题库带答案
- 2025年河南农业职业学院单招职业倾向性测试题库必考题
- 蔚来销售培训
- 艾滋病、梅毒母婴阻断干预技术课件
- 中国常规肺功能检查基层指南解读(2024年)解读课件
评论
0/150
提交评论