【哈佛商业评论】为什么微软要衡量员工的繁荣而不是参与度_第1页
【哈佛商业评论】为什么微软要衡量员工的繁荣而不是参与度_第2页
【哈佛商业评论】为什么微软要衡量员工的繁荣而不是参与度_第3页
【哈佛商业评论】为什么微软要衡量员工的繁荣而不是参与度_第4页
【哈佛商业评论】为什么微软要衡量员工的繁荣而不是参与度_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩5页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

AnalyticsAndDataScienceWhyMicrosoftMeasuresEmployeeThriving,NotEngagementbyDawnKlinghofferandElizabethMcCuneJune24,2022FrancescoCartafotografo/GettyImagesSummary.Asthepandemiccontinuesandmanypeopleworkhybridschedules,peopleanalyticsresearchersatMicrosoftrealizedtheyneededtomovefrommeasuringemployeeengagementtomeasuringemployeethriving.Deinedas“tobeenergizedand...moreOnethingisclear:Noneofusarethesamepeopletodayaswewerepriorto2020.So,asouremployeeschange,thewayswecanbestempowerthemneedtoevolve,too.AtMicrosoft,whereweworkonthePeopleAnalyticsteam,thatmeanslearningwhatthedatacantellusabouthowouremployeesaspiretolivetheirlivesmeaningfully.Inparticular,welandedonanewwayofmeasuringthriving,atbothworkandoutsideofit,thatgoesbeyondengagementonly.Inthisarticle,wesharehowandwhywecametothismeasurement—andhowyourowncompanycanlearnfromourexperiences.WhyThrivingIstheNewNorthStarPriortothisyear,weconductedonelengthy,annualsurveythattrackedemployeeengagement.Itoftentookmonthstodigestandplanactionsaround.Yet,weconsistentlyencounteredchallengesinbuildingashareddefinitionofengagementacrossthecompany.Andoften,despiteemployeeengagementscoresthatwouldseemtoindicatethatthingsweregoingwell,itbecameclearthatemployeeswerestrugglingwhenwediveddeeperintotheresponses.Tous,thiswasareflectionthatwehadn’tyetsetahighenoughbarfortheemployeeexperience,anditmotivatedustodobetterinmeasuringwhatmatters.So,westartedaskingemployeesforfeedbackthroughashorteryetmorefocusedsurveyeverysixmonths,forwhichwepartneredwithemployeesuccessplatformGlint.Thisnewapproachishelpingusstayclosertoemployees’feedbackandtakeclearerandmoreimmediateactioninresponse.Wealsosoughttodefineanew,higherbarthatwentbeyondengagementonly,drawinginspirationfrommanysources.OnewaswhatOurChiefPeopleOfficer,KathleenHogan,calls“The5P’s.”SimilartoMaslow’sHierarchy,itbreaksdownemployeefulfillmentintofivekey,successivecomponents:pay,perks,people,pride,andpurpose.Inatimethathaspromptedmanytoreflectontheroleofworkandcareerintheirlives,itfeltcriticaltorecalibrateourlisteningsystemstomeasureourprogresstowardsthatendgoal—asenseofpurpose.WewerealsoinspiredbyRossSchoolofBusiness’sGretchenSpreitzerandcolleagues’researchonthrivingastheantidotetolanguishing.Aswemovedbeyondemployeeengagement,wedecidedtofocusonourownversionofemployeethriving.AtMicrosoft,wedefinethrivingas“tobeenergizedandempoweredtodomeaningfulwork.”Thisisthenewcoreaspirationwehaveforouremployees,onethatchallengesustopushourselveseverydaysoeveryemployeecanfeelthey’repursuingthatsenseofpurpose.Ourfocusonthrivingisn’tjustaboutrecoveringfromtheimpactofthepandemicormatchingpre-Covidemployeesentimentscores.It’saboutcomingouttheothersideanddoingevenbetter.WhatItLooksLiketoThriveWhenourfirstemployeesurveydatacamebackearlierthisyear,webeganbenchmarkingourthrivingforthefirsttime.Welookedatnotjusthowmanypeoplereportedtheywerethriving,butcalculatedcompany-wideaveragesbasedonresponsesfromafive-pointscale—ifanemployeeselected“stronglydisagree,”thattranslatedtoanindividualscoreofzero,and“stronglyagree”wouldbetheequivalentofa100.Thisensuredourinsightstookintoaccountallpositive,negative,andneutralsentiment.Afteranalyzingtheresults,wefoundthatthrivingaverageda77acrossthecompany—anumberweseeasstrong,butonewecanstillworkon.Whenwebrokedownthrivingintoitsthreecomponents,wesawthatmeaningfulwork(79)andempowerment(79)bothscoredhigheramongemployeesthanenergized(73).Tounderstandtheemployeeexperiencesbehindthenumbers,wedoveintotheopen-endedsurveyresponses.Threekeythemesstoodout.Culturematters.Whatwesawwasthatemployeeswhowerethrivingandnotthrivingwerebothtalkingaboutculture,butinvastlydifferentways.Thrivingemployeestalkedaboutacollaborativeenvironmentandteamworkwithcolleagues,aninclusiveculturewithautonomyandflexibility,andwell-beingsupport.Thesecommentsreferenceexamplessuchasbeingabletohavehonest,non-judgmentalconversationsondifficulttopics,withafocusonfindingsolutions.Employeeswhoweren’tthrivingtalkedaboutexperiencingsiloes,bureaucracy,andalackofcollaboration.Inthesecommentswehearalackofagencyandasenseforbeingacoginamachine.Inotherwords,theoppositeofbeingempoweredandenergizedtodomeaningfulwork.Thrivingtakesavillage.Divingdeeperintothenumbers,it’sclearthateveryonehasaroletoplay.AtMicrosoft,we’velongstudiedimportanceofmanagers,andweknowtheirrolehasbeenmorecrucialthaneverastheyhelpedtheirteamsnavigatethroughuncertainty.It’shearteningtoseeourmanagersshineduringsuchadifficulttime.“Mymanagertreatsmewithdignityandrespect”scoreda93,meaningalmosteveryemployeeselected“stronglyagree”—butthisalsomeanswestillneedtoensurethat’stheexperienceforeverysingleemployee.Wealsosawhighscoresinconfidenceinmanager’seffectiveness(87)andmanagers’supportforcareers(85),showingstrongsentimentthatmanagersarehelpingtheirteamssucceedatthecompany.Whileweseethesescoresasstrengths,they’restrengthswewanttokeepbuildingtoensureapositivelivedexperienceforallemployees.Thrivingandwork-lifebalancearenotthesamething.Aswethinkabouthowtosupportthriving,it’simportanttodistinguishitfromwork-lifebalance.Whilethrivingisfocusedonbeingenergizedandempoweredtodomeaningfulworkinyourrole,work-lifebalancereflectsemployees’personallives,too.Employeesratedtheirsatisfactionwithwork-lifebalanceasa71,andwhileit’sencouragingtoseework-lifebalanceimproving,ithasn’tfullyrecoveredyettopre-Covidlevels.Andtherearetimeswhenthrivingandwork-lifebalancecanmoveindifferentdirections.Forexample,anearly-in-careeremployeewhofeelsunderutilizedintheirrolemayhavegreatwork-lifebalancefromaperspectiveofhoursandworkload,butnotfeelenergizedwhilethey’reatworkorinspiredbythemeaningandimpactofwhatthey’reworkingon.Ontheotherhand,therearetimeswhenpeoplecanthriveandfeelsofulfilledbythehardworkittakestomakeprogressonabigprojectthattheycanmakeashort-termtradeoffonwork-lifebalance.Weknowthatwork-lifebalancemayebbandflow,butwantedtolearnfromemployeeswhobothratedtheirwork-lifebalancehighlyandsaidtheywerethrivinginthatwork-focusedportionoftheirlife.So,wecomparedthe56%ofouremployeeswhosaidtheywerethrivingandreportedhigherwork-lifebalancetothe16%whowerethrivingbuthadlowerwork-lifebalancescores.Bycombiningsentimentdatawithde-identifiedcalendarandemailmetadata,wefoundthatthosewiththebestofbothworldshadfivefewerhoursintheirworkweekspan,fivefewercollaborationhours,threemorefocushours,and17feweremployeesintheirinternalnetworksize.Thisreinforceswhatweknowfromearlierwork-lifebalanceresearchandnetworksizeanalysis,whichshowedusthatincreasedcollaborationdoeshaveanegativeimpactonemployees’perceptionofwork-lifebalance.Italsoconfirmsthatcollaborationisnotinherentlybad—formanyemployees,thosetimesofcloseteamworkandstrivingtowardacommongoalcanfuelthriving.However,itisimportanttobemindfulofhowintensecollaborationcanimpactwork-lifebalance,andleadersandemployeesalikeshouldguardagainstthatintensitybecoming24/7.ChallengesforThrivingontheRoadAheadAsmoreandmorecompanieslookcloselyathowtheylistentoandhelptheiremployees,it’simportanttospendtimeunderstandingwhatyournorthstaris—andtomakesureit’sconnectedtotheoutcomesyouaretryingtodriveasanorganization.Thisneweraofhybridworkwon’tworkforemployeesifyou’renotlistening—orifwhatyou’relisteningfordoesn’tevolvealongwiththemandhowtheydotheirjobs.Thereisn’tasingularone-size-fits-allsolutionoutthere,butpayingcloseattentiontohowyouremployeesthriveisonepathforward.Weknowthisisjustthebeginningofourjourneytounderstandthisinourownorganization.Lookingholisticallyatthewrittenresponsesfromthosewhoweren’tthrivingoffersmorecluesaboutwhereelsewecanimproveforouremployees.Forexample,whileemployeesscored“Ifeelincludedinmyteam”highlyat86,byfarthemostcommonthreadamongthosewhowerenotthrivingwasafeelingofexclusion—fromalackofcollaborationtofeelingleftoutofdecisionstostrugglingwithpoliticsandbureaucracy.We’llcontinuetofocusonensuringinclusionisfeltaspartofourcultureacrossallteamsandorgs.Ultimately,everyscore,whetherhighorlow,g

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论