gre考试备考时间不够该如何给写作减负

gre考试备考时间不够该怎样给写作“减负”一共有多少题目gre写作有一个特点，也是我们应当利用的特点：它的题库是完整公然的。我们最后在上碰到的题目会直接从题库中抽取而出，不会做任何改变。所以，理论上讲，只需我们提早准备好全部题目，

GRE写作的高分是绝对能保障的，这一点和

GRE的语文和数学都不同样。看完题库以后，大家应当意气消沉了。不用数了，

Issue

部分题目：

152道。Argument

题目：177道。这样的“天文数字”，仿佛让我们无从下手，可是真的有这么多道题目吗不是的

!仔细的同学应当会发现，无论是

Issue

仍是

Argument，有好多题目的题干是高度相像甚至是完整同样的，重复率几乎为

50%。这样一来，

Issue

部分我们需要准备的题目数目就变为了：

152/2=76，Argument

部分我们需要准备的题目数目就变为了：

177/2≈89。题库直接减小了一半。但即使这样，

gre

考试题目数目仍是好多，有没有方法再减少一些呢

?要减负，就减负得狠一些gre

考生们自己在准备时，简单堕入一个对题目的错误分类方式

(或说是不高效的分类方式)：Issue

依据“领域

(即艺术、治、科技、教育等

)”分类，

Argument

依据“经典逻辑错误(臆造因果，错误类比等

)”分类。这样的分类方式合用于老

GRE，假如考生依旧依据这样的分类方式，很有可能就会堕入误区。那么，新

GRE的题目分类方式应当是依据什么呢

?一个词，Instruction。Instruction又叫Direction，中文意思是“详细性指令”或“写作要求”。题当今面这段斜体字就是Instruction。以前有同学跟我们反应说：“以前认为每道题目下边的这个斜体字都是同样的，所以根本不看”不看

Instruction

的结果很沉重，

ETS明确说，假如不依据

Instruction

，最高分不会超过三分。而Issue中间一共有6种Instruction，Argument中间一共有4种对我们行文都有不同的要求。这样看来，在面对新GRE时，我们应当依据

InstructionInstruction

，每一种来对题这样一来，我们需要准备的题目的类型数目即为：

Issue6

道，Argument4

道。加在一同是10道题目，是本来总题目数目的3%。这个减负力度，够狠了吧。假如只有一周了，练几篇这个问题也真是把我们上了死路。但还剩一周才来看作文的同学其实也不在少量。在这样的时间节点上，由于Argument的套路性更强，模板也更好用，所以更好拿分，我们会告诉大家：“保Argument，争Issue”。即把重点放在Argument上边，而Issue部分只需要理解写作重点，实在没有时间就能够不做全文练习了。这样一来，我们面对GRE写作，最少应当练——4篇。题目："petitionisultimatelyrebeneficialthandetrimentaltosociety."归根结底，竞争关于是利多弊少。正文：Darwinsuggestedthattheprocessofevolutionisonebasedonpetition.Thisdeadlypetitionweedsouttheweakandonlythefittestofthespeciessurvives.Humans,beingtheproductofmillionsofyearsofevolution,arebynature,petitivebeings.Yet,humansarealsosocialbeings.Likethebeesinthehive,wearenotverysuccessfullivingpletelyonourown.Weneedtocooperatewithotherindividualsforoursurvival.Thus,aconflictensues,betweenourinnatepetitiveness,andourneedtocooperate.Thereareprosandconsassociatedwithboth.However,itismybeliefthatoverall,petition,isredetrimentalthanbeneficialtohumansociety.First,letustrytoidentifywhythereispetitioninthefirstplace.Inanenvironmentabundantwithresources,wheresupplyoutstripsdemand,thereisverylittleneedfortheinhabitantstofightwitheachotheroverthem.Thisisnotthecaseonplanetearth.Resourcesarelimited,andthereisconstantjostlingtogettothefrontoftheueuetogetacuirethem.Forexample,thousandsofprospectivestudentsapplytogainentrancetotopuversitiesaroundtheworld,butthereareonlyahandfulofplacesinthoseuversities.Thus,thereispetitiontogetintotothesehallowedinstXXtionsofhigherlearng.Fromautilitarianperspective,petitionisagoodthing.Inevolutionitisresnsiblefortheeliminationof"weak"genes.Inthebusinessenvironment,itgetsridoftheweakerplayers.Inlitics,itweedsoutunpularcandidates.Inacademia,itgetsridofweakstudents.Furtherre,petitionleadstoselfimprovement.Businesseswillstrivetoofferbetterproductsandservicesatlesserprices.Theconsumerreapsrichrewardsfromthispetitivespirit.liticiansstrivetodotheutstforthepeople,sotheywouldgetreelected.Studentsexcelintherestudies,tryingtooutdoeachother.Thus,ostensibly,petitionisresnsibleforthebettermentofthesocietyasaXXle.However,thisisjustthesuperficialview.Underththesuce,petition,ineveryaspect,isslowlyeatingawayattheveryfabricofthesociety.Whileitistruetosaythatpetitionincorrateworldhasbroughtgreatbenefitstotheconsumer,thesocietyas"MissedAhere"XXleisplayingagreatpriceforit.stbusinessesareexploitingcheaplabourinthethirdworldtomaximisetheirprofits.TherearethousandsofsweatshopsrunbywellknownwesterncorrationsincountrieslikeIndonesia,BangladeshandChina.Peopleareforcedtoworkinsualidconditions,often16hoursaday.TheyareluckytorXXiveadollaradayfortherelabours.Thementagovernmentinanyofthesecountriestrytoimprovetheworkingconditionsoftheemployees,thesemultinationalgiantsfleethecountry,oftenleingXXlemutiecingfinancialn.Thecorrationsareawarethatthereareplentyofotherlabourmarketsthatcouldbeexploitedwithgayabandon.Thatisjustthehumancost.Whatabouttheenvironmentalcosts?petitionhasforcedmanycorrationsto"streamline"theiroperations.Environmentalstandardsarenormallythefirstvictimsofthis"streamline"process.Asigficantauntofenvironmentalllutionandlanddegradationhasbeenblamedonindustry,yetthefactorieskeepproducingreandre.Thousandsofitemsgounsoldeachyearduetopetition.Onlyafractionofthismerndiseisrecycled.Therestgoestothealreadyoverflowinglandfills.GRE写作题目：Muchoftheinformationthatpeopleassumeisfactualactuallyturnsouttobeinaccurate.Thus，anypiXXofinformationreferredtoasa‘fact’shouldbemistrustedsinceitmaywellbeprovenfalseinthefuture.大部分人们认为是事实的信息结果实质上都是不正确的。所以，任何据称是事实的信息都应当被怀疑，由于它在未来很可能会被证明为是错误的。GRE写作范文：ShouldwebedoubtfultoalltheinformationathandsbXXusetherightnessofwhichisuncertain?Thespeakerclaimsso，Iconcedethatpeopleoftenmitvariousfallaciesinthecourseofcogzingthings

，howeverIfundamentallytakeexceptionofthearguer'sassertiontomistrusteveryfactwemightencounter.AndIwillsubstantiallydiscussmyviewsthereinafter.Tobeginwith，thespeakerseemstoimplicatethatafactwouldbeprovenfalseinthefutureundernumerousumstance.NeverthelessIprefertoarguerthatfactsnevernge.NomatterhowdidtheMedievalChurchandInuisitionpersecuteBruno，thefactneverngesthattheearthisfarfrombeingthXXnteroftheuverseasthereligioussovereignshadassumedorhopedfor，whilejustaminorparticleinit.Eually，nomatterhowEdisonhadtriedtoincitethepublicfearanddistrusttothealternativecurrentelectricity，thefactneverngesthatTeals’electricalsystemisvastlysuperiortohisdirectcurrentelectricalone，andwouldbeacceptedandappliedinlargerrange.However，whatdongearethehuman'sobjectiveinterpretationstofacts.Onepellingargumenttothisintisthat，duetothelimitationofhuman’sknowledgeandprehensivecapability，theytendtomakeinsufficientorevenfalseunderstandingtothecertainfact.Anaptillustrationisthengesofcogtiontodisease.Whileattheancienttime，ourprogetorsbelievedtheamanbeingapatientforthereasonthathehadconductcrimesoroffendedsomeghostsorspirits，thecontemrarypeoplehewellknowthatthevariesofpathogensarethebasiccausestoourdiseases，andthedefectsofourimmunesystemandsofortharealsothefactorsaswell.Anotherargumentforthengeofprehensiontofactisthatdifferentpeoplealwaysobserveandinterpretfromdifferentperspectives.ThoughtheRelativitytheoryisnotwellpliablewiththeuantumme，noonecallthegreatnessofbothEinsteinandBohr，bXXusetheirtheoriesarebasedondistinctviews，theformerfromthemacrocoandthelaterfromthemicroco.Notwithstandingtheforegoingreasonsforthathumantendtomakefallaciesduringthecauseofprehendingandcogzingfacts，thesereasonsshouldneverbetheexcusestodoubteveryconclusionwemightdrawfromfacts.Basedoncertainrationalinferenceandproperknowledgefundament，theconclusionswemakemightwellbejustifiable，ifnotpletelyright，tocertaindegree.Whatweneedtodoistoprotetheenterpriseofpursuingthebetteranswerandtrytousetheresultwehegettoapplication，inst