2003年CAE中国企业人力资源行情研究报告_第1页
2003年CAE中国企业人力资源行情研究报告_第2页
2003年CAE中国企业人力资源行情研究报告_第3页
2003年CAE中国企业人力资源行情研究报告_第4页
2003年CAE中国企业人力资源行情研究报告_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩36页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

CAE–2003HRSurvey

FindingsContentsResearchBackgroundResearchObjectivesResearchMethodologySampleClassificationBackgroundInformationExecutiveSummaryResearchFindingsConclusionDetailedFindingsResearchBackgroundHumanResourcesistheessenceofahealthycompany.Recruitingtherightpersonforthejobiscrucialtoacompany’sperformance,invigoratingitandmaximizingefficiency.Shanghai—China’smostprosperouscity—attractsmoreandmoreforeigncompaniestoitssoil,giantcorporationsandsmallstart-upsalike.TheydemandprofessionalHRagenciestohelprecruitidealpersonnelandbuildanHRsystem.Withaimtounderstandthecurrentneedsandattitudesofforeigncompanies/jointventures(JVs)towardsHRservicesinShanghai,inMay2003CBCMarketingResearchundertookacomprehensivestudyofhundredsofforeigncompaniesfromavarietyofsectors.TheresearchresultsintendtoguideHRservicecompaniestobetterunderstandingtheirclients’needs.ResearchObjectivesThisstudycoversthefollowingtopics:AwarenessofHRagencies&HRagencies/headhuntersamongforeigncompanies/JVsinShanghaiRateofturnoverinvariousmajordepartmentsAttitudestowardscurrentHRagencies/headhuntersSatisfactionlevelsregardingcurrentHRagencies/headhuntersCurrentclientretentionandnewclientpotentialforHRagencies/headhuntersforC-levelrecruitingResearchMethodologyComputerAidedTelephoneInterviews(CATI)CitycoverageShanghaiSamplesizeatotalofn=261CATIsurveyswereconductedTargetrespondentsHumanResourcesManagersintheShanghaibranchesofforeigncompanies/JVsSampleClassificationCompanyownership

JV–JointVenture FOP-ForeignwhollyownedprivateFOL-ForeignwhollyownedlimitedIndustries:allCompanyScale:Small/Medium/Large [basedonthenumberofemployeesinChina]Small-Below50employees

Medium-51-300employeesLarge-Over300employeesRespondenttypeC-level-CEO,COO,CFO,CTO,CIO,etc.M-Level–MiddlemanageriallevelOthertermsDK=don’tknowAidedresponse=apromptedresponse;testspassiverecognitiononlyUnaidedresponse=anunpromptedresponse;testsactiverecognitionRespondentCompanies-In=261Base:AllrespondentsMorethanhalfofinterviewedcompanieswereFOLs,andnearly1/3wereJVs.Theyencompassednineindustries.TheLightIndustryandConsulting/Servicessectorscomposedmorethanhalfofallcompletes.OwnershipIndustryRespondentCompanies-IIn=261Base:Allrespondents63%ofrespondentcompaniesemployedover2000staffworldwide.1/3ofthesecompaniesemployedover500inChinaalone.EmployeeCountsWorldwideEmployeeCountsinChinaExecutiveSummaryAwarenessofCurrentHRAgencies&HRAgencies/HeadhuntersNosingleHRagencyorheadhunterdominatestheShanghaimarket.LocalHRagencieshavegreaterawarenessthanlocalheadhunters.

Nearly80HRagencies/headhunterswerementionedunprompted.51jobhadthegreatestawareness,followedbyZhaopinandFESCO.ThreelocalShanghaiagencieshadunaidedawarenessesofaround4%.51jobandZhaopinalsoledinaidedawareness(awareness>90%).ManpowerandStaffServicereceivedrelativelyhigherawarenessamongforeignHRagencies/headhunters.Largecompanieshadsignificantlyhigherawarenessof‘上海经营者人才服务’(ShanghaiExecutiveSearchConsulting),‘科锐咨询’(Chinacareer),andManpower.RateofTurnoverbyPositionandDepartmentTechnicalstaffhaveahigherrateofturnoverthandepartmentmanagers.Onaverage,3.6newdepartmentmanagersarehiredpercompanyperyear.Theaveragefortechnicalstaff:13.7positions.DepartmentturnoversmixedFinance/Administrationdepartmentshadthelowestturnover,whileSales/Marketingdepartmentshadthehighest.JVshadsignificantlylowerratesthanFOPandFOLcompanies.However,FOPnon-Finance/AdministrationdepartmentsratesweresignificantlyhigherthanthoseofJVs,FOLs.Morethan1/3ofHRmanagerswereunclearontheturnoverrateinProduction,Engineering,andCustomerServicedepartments.RecruitmentMethodsEvaluation-IRespondentsevaluated4channels:recruitmentwebsites,recruitmentnewspapers,staff/friendrecommendations,andtheHRservicemarket.Theywerebasicallysatisfiedwiththeperformanceofall.Staff/friendrecommendationsandrecruitingnewspaperswereperceivedasslightlybetterthantheothertwochannels.HRmanagersusedifferentrecruitmentmethods/channelstorecruitattheC-,M-,andTechnicalstafflevels.HeadhuntersareusedmorethananyotherHRservicechanneltorecruitC-levels.However,overonethirdofrespondentswerenotinvolvedinC-levelrecruitment.Only8%ofsmallrespondentcompaniesoftenseekHRagencies/headhuntershelprecruitingC-levelpersonnel.RecruitmentMethodsEvaluation-IIPostingsonrecruitmentwebsitesandnewspapersare2majorwaystoattractM-levelcandidates(29%and21%,respectively).About1/5ofcompaniesalsorecruitM-levelcandidateswiththehelpofHRagencies/headhunters.14%ofM-levelrecruitscomefrominternalpromotions.

Technicalstaffarelargelyrecruitedthroughrecruitmentwebsitesandnewspapers(39%and27%ofallchannels,respectively).Implications:HRagenciesandHRagencies/headhuntersshouldtakeadvantageofthepotentialmarketinhuntingC-levelandM-levelpersonnelinmediumandlargeforeigncompanies.

UsageHabits&Attitudes:CurrentHRAgencies/Headhunters-ICIICandFESCOarebothmajormarketplayersintheC-andM-levelrecruitingmarkets.Nevertheless,plentyofsmallHRagencies/headhuntersalsocompete.39%ofcompaniesuseservicesprovidedbyCIICtorecruitC-levels,and19%useFESCO.NooneHRagency/headhunterhasastrongshareofthismarket.With67%ofthetotalShanghaimarketshare,CIICandFESCOdominatethecity’sM-levelrecruitingservicemarket.SatisfactionlevelsregardingC-levelandM-levelrecruitingserviceswereaboutthesame.MostHRmanagerswere“somewhatsatisfied”withtheperformanceofcurrentHRagency/headhunterpartners.UsageHabits&Attitudes:CurrentHRAgencies/Headhunters-IIWordofmouthamongHRmanagersiscrucialforthesuccessofHRagencies/headhunters.Friends’referrals(46%)serveasthemajorchannelforHRmanagerstochoosetheirHRagencies/headhunters.Businessvisits(37%)toHRmanagersalsoinfluencedselectionoftheHRagency/headhunter.ValuedHRagency/headhunterservices:‘ServiceEfficiency’isperceivedasthemostimportantquality,and‘OtherValue-addedService’theleast.‘CommunicationSkills’arealsoimportant.‘ConsultingExperience’and‘BrandName’arenotasimportant.Headhuntersneedtoprovidemorethanjustrecruitmentservices.HRmanagersshowedinterestinReferenceCheckingandFollow-Upservices.CurrentClientRetentionandNewClientPotentialforC-levelHeadhuntersTheheadhuntermarketisdynamic,characterizedbyacombinationoflowcurrentuserloyaltyandhighpotentialfornewfutureclientcooperation.About1/3ofcurrentclientsplantochangeheadhuntersinthenearfuture.41%ofcompaniesinterviewedplantobeginusingaheadhunter.HRmanagerspreferJVorlocalheadhuntersforC-levelrecruiting.Nearly2/5ofHRmanagerswouldconsiderJVheadhuntersinthefuture.Incombinationwithlocalheadhunters,these“local”entitieshold56%ofthemarketshare.Only8%ofHRmanagerswouldchooseforeign-whollyownedheadhunters.DetailedFindingsPartI-AwarenessUnaidedAwarenessofHRAgencies&HRAgencies/HeadhuntersTotaln=261%Base:AllrespondentsWithoutprompt,42%ofHRmanagerscannotrecallanyHRagencies/headhunters.Amongthosementioned,51Jobreceivedthemostmentions.UnaidedAwareness51Job前程无忧Zhaopin招聘网FESCO外企服务CAE中消研(HRmarket)人才交流中心S.E.S.C.上海经营者人才服务ShanghaiShen-Cai上海申才择业Manpower万宝华Others(<3%)Don’tknowAidedAwarenessofHRAgencies&HRAgencies/HeadhuntersTotaln=261%Base:AllrespondentsWithprompt,51JobandZhaopinhadveryhighawarenessamongrespondents.About¼wereawareofManpowerandStaffService,whichhadhigherawarenesslevelsthanotherHRagencies/headhunters.TotalAwareness(Unaided+AidedAwareness)51Job前程无忧Zhaopin招聘网S.E.S.C.上海经营者人才服务ShanghaiShen-Cai上海申才择业JingYing精英企业管理咨询Chinacae

中消研Manpower万宝华StaffService仕达富MRIConferry光辉国际浩竹猎头PartII–RetentionRateNumbersofNewRecruits(last12months)Totaln=261%Base:AllrespondentsOnaverage,threetimesmoretechnicalstaffthandepartmentmanagerswererecruitedinthepastyear.DepartmentManagers1-3(2)3-6(5)6+(6)NoneTechnicalStaff1-10(5)10-50(25)50+(50)NoneAveragenumber: 3.6 13.7TurnoverRatesofVariousDepartments-IManyHRmanagersdidnotknowtheturnoverratesoftheirProduction,Engineering,andCustomerServiceDepartments.TurnoverratesinFinance/Administrationdepartmentsarelow.Totaln=261Sales/MarketingEngineer-ingCustomerServiceFinance/AdministrationProduction%%%%%Averageturnoverlevelrating: 2.49 2.25 2.25 2.22 2.08TurnoverRatesofVariousDepartments-IITotaln=261Base:AllrespondentsAverageScore(5pointscale:1=lowestrateofturnover,5=highest)Generally,theretentionrateindifferentdepartmentsisneitherhighnorlow,fromtheperspectiveoftheirHRmanagers.TheturnoverrateinJointVenturesislowest,whileitishigherinForeignOwnedPrivatecompanies.JV:2.24 2.08 1.98 2.06 1.88FOP:2.62 3.34 3.17 3.33 2.15FOL:2.61 2.28 2.31 2.25 2.19PartIII–RecruitmentMethodsRecruitmentMethodsforC-levelManagerialStaffTotaln=261Base:AllrespondentsAboutonefifthofrespondentcompaniesuseheadhuntersmostoftentorecruitC-levelstaff,whileonly8%ofsmallcompaniesoftencooperatewithheadhunters.MorethanonethirdofHRmanagersdefertoheadquartersintherecruitmentofC-levelstaff.88%aredirectlymanagedbyheadquartersHeadhuntersinUseTotaln=55%Base:Allthosewhouseheadhunters.Therearefourmajortypesofagencies/headhuntersonthemarket.Foreignagencies/headhuntersoccupythelargestmarketshare,with54percent.JVagencies/headhuntersandlocalagencies/headhuntershaveequalshares.RecruitmentMethodsforMiddle-levelManagerialStaffTotaln=261Base:AllrespondentsUnlikeforC-levels,almostallHRmanagersunderstandMiddle-levelrecruitment.Manyadvertiseonwebsitesandinnewspapers.Inaddition,nearlyone-fifthcooperatewithHRagencies/headhunters.RecruitmentMethodsforTechnicalStaffTotaln=261Base:AllrespondentsAdvertisingonwebsitesandnewspaperarethemajorwaystorecruittechnicalstaff.Only9%ofrespondentsuseHRagencies/headhunters.RecruitmentMethods-Summaryn=261%Thechartclearlyshowsthedistinctionsamongrecruitmentmethodsfordifferentkindsofpersonnel.HRagencies/headhuntersRecruitmentwebsitesRecruitmentnewspapersStaff/friendrecomm.ChosenbyheadquartersInternalPromotionHRMarketDKC-level M-level TechnicalstaffBase:Allrespondents.n=261%n=261%SatisfactionregardingtheRecruitmentChannels

ExcludingHRagencies/headhuntersTotaln=261Base:AllrespondentsAverageScore(5pointscale:1=VeryDissatisfied,5=VerySatisfied)HRmanagersarebasicallysatisfiedwiththerecruitmentchannelstheyuse.‘Staff/friendrecommendations’and‘Recruitmentnewspapers’areasperceivedbetterthantheothertwoPartIV–SearchServicesUsageHabitsCurrentCooperationswithHRAgencies/Headhuntersn=54%Base:AllthosewhouseheadhuntertorecruitspecificpersonnelMorecompanieschoseCIICandFESCO.CIICandFESCOarethekeymarketplayersforbothC-levelandM-levelrecruiting.Nevertheless,plentyofsmallHRagencies/headhunterscompeteinthemarket.CIICFESCOConferryOther(2%)DKC-level M-leveln=48%Note:BaseforTechnicalStafftoosmallforinclusion.CIICFESCOConferryZhaopin培英(PeiYing)斯科(SiKe)Other(2%)DKCurrentHRAgency/HeadhunterPartnersSatisfactionSatisfactionlevelsofC-levelandM-levelrecruitingservicesarealmostthesame.MostHRManagersaresomewhatsatisfiedwiththeperformanceofcurrentpartnerHRagencies/headhunters.AverageRating: 3.9 3.9 n=54%C-level M-leveln=48%Base:AllthosewhouseheadhunterstorecruitspecificpersonnelChannelsUsedtoFindCurrentHRPartners

n=70%Base:AllthosewhocurrentlyuseaheadhunterFriends’referralsmostimpactHRmanagers’selectionoftheirHRagencies/headhunters.BusinessvisitsfromHRagencies/headhuntersalsoinfluenceselection.Friend’sReferralBusinessVisitWebsite/EmailAdvertisement(Paper)PersonalRelationshipRankingofImportantHeadhunterAttributesServiceEfficiencyisperceivedasmostimportant,andOtherValue-addedServicetheleast.Comm

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论