Chapter 4 Presupposition and entailment_第1页
Chapter 4 Presupposition and entailment_第2页
Chapter 4 Presupposition and entailment_第3页
Chapter 4 Presupposition and entailment_第4页
Chapter 4 Presupposition and entailment_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩17页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、 Now we look at two kinds of inference. Entailment emphasizes the relationship between sentences that forms the basis for some other inferences. Presupposition emphasizes the inference that is more context-dependent. Presupposition and entailment are technical terms used to describe two different as

2、pects of the information that speakers assume that listeners already know. Presupposition is something the speaker assumes to be the case prior to making an utterance. Speakers, not sentences, have presuppositions. Entailment is something that logically follows from what is asserted in the utterance

3、. Sentences, not speakers, have entailments. PresuppositionIn the USA, an accused mugger rather foolishly chose to defend himself at the trial. The following is one of the questions he put to his victim. Did you get a good look at my face when I took your purse? Why do you think the accused mugger i

4、s so foolish?Presupposition Look at the relationship between the following two propositions. a. Marys dog is cut. (=p) b. Mary has a dog. (=q) c. p q (p presupposes q) a. Marys dog isnt cute. (=NOT p) b. Mary has a dog. (=q) c. NOT p q Presupposition a. Everybody knows that John is gay. (=p) b. Ever

5、ybody doesnt know that John is gay. (=NOT p) c. John is gay. (=q) d. p q & NOT p q Constancy under negation: The presupposition of a statement will remain constant (i.e. still true) even when that statement is negated. Types of presupposition triggerLexical Examples Existential s , the, that, th

6、is, these, those factiveRealize, regret, knowNon factive Dream, imagine, pretendStructural Examples“if” conditional structure If you were my friend, you would have helped me. You are not my friend. Wh-question /subordinate clause When did he leave? He left. Types of presupposition trigger Decide whi

7、ch ones contain the presupposition that at the time the utterance was made “ There was a chocolate cake”. What do those utterances have in common?1. (a) Mike might find the chocolate cake in the kitchen. (b) Mike might find a chocolate cake in the kitchen.2. (a) Is Mike giving Annie that chocolate c

8、ake? (b) Is Mike giving Annie a chocolate cake?3. (a) Did Mike hide a chocolate cake? (b) Did Mike hide Annies chocolate cake?Types of presupposition triggerShe didnt realize he was ill. ( He was ill.) I wasnt aware that she was married. ( She was married. ) I dreamed that I was rich. ( I was not ri

9、ch.) If you were my friend, you would have helped me. ( You are not my friend. )Types of presupposition triggerDecide which ones contain the presupposition that “Mike smashed the television”. What do those utterances have in common?a. Did Mike smash the television?b. When did Mike smash the televisi

10、on?c. I was eating popcorn when Mike smashed the television. d. Why did Mike smash the television?e. I dont understand why Mike smashed the television.f. I wonder if Mike smashed the television.g. I wonder how Mike smashed the television. The projection problem see pp30-31 12 14 The meaning of some

11、presuppositions (as parts) doesnt survive (project) to become the meaning of some complex sentences (as wholes). How to explain the projection problem? It is destroyed by entailment. The entailment (a necessary/logical consequence of what is said) is simply more powerful than the presupposition (an

12、earlier assumption). The projection problem The power of entailment can also be used to cancel existential presupposition. a. The King of England visited us. ( the existence of king) b. The King of England doesnt exist! (-There is not a king.) The presupposition of “the existence of king” is cancell

13、ed by the entailment of b. Summary We have described presuppositions as inferences about what is assumed in an utterance rather than directly asserted. Presuppositions are closely linked to the words and grammatical structures that are actually used in the utterance and our knowledge about the way l

14、anguage users conventionally interpret them. Presuppositions can be cancelled by entailment. Entailment Suppose that sentence (a) in each pair is true. Then look at sentence (b) and decide if you can assume that it is automatically true. 1. (a) Annie caught a trout. (b) Annie caught a fish. 2. (a) A

15、nnie is thin. (b) Annie is not fat. 3. (a) Annie baked a cake. (b) Annie baked something. Entailment Once sentence (a) is true, sentence (b) becomes automatically true. Sentence(b) is an entailment of sentence (a).This kind of inference is “for free”. It requires only a knowledge of the semantics. T

16、rout/fish, thin/fat, cake/something. Ordered entailments One utterance may involve very large number of background entailments. The speaker will indicate how these entailments are to be ordered. The speaker will communicate by stress, which entailment is assumed to be in the foreground. a. Rover cha

17、sed THREE squirrels. (three is foregrounded.) b. ROVER chased three aquirrels. (ROVER is foregrounded.)Ordered entailments Using “it-cleft” construction This is particularly useful in written language where stress is not available. a. The PAINTERS broke the window. (spoken) b. It was the painters wh

18、o broke the window. (written) When the cleft construction is used in spoken language combined with heavy stress, some interesting meaning differences can emerge. Compare: a. It wasnt ME who burnt the toast. (it is anybody else) b. It WANSNT me who burnt the toast. (It was me)Summary All sentences ha

19、ve a number of entailments-other sentences which are automatically true if the original sentence is true. Entailments are inferences that can be drawn solely from our knowledge abut the semantic relationship in a language. This knowledge allows us to communicate much more than we actually “say”. Exe

20、rcises Here are three different stress patterns for Annie ruined the sweater. Try to tell which entailment is being foregrounded. a. Annie RUINED the sweater. b. Annie ruined the SWEATER. c. ANNIE ruined the sweater. Exercises Which of the following sentences cannot be designated as “true” or “false” unless you have extra non-linguistic information? a. My hamster is a mammal. b. My cousin is a girl. c. My sister is a gir

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论