SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板

1、精品文档SCI 修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板SCI 修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分） Listof ResponsesDear Editorsand Reviewers:Thank you foryour letterand forthe reviewers commentsconcerningour manuscriptentitled“ Paper Title” (ID:文章稿号).Those commentsare allvaluableand very helpfulforrevisingand improvingour paper,as well a

2、s the importantguidingsignificanceto our researches.Wehave studiedcommentscarefullyand have madecorrectionwhich wehope meet with approval.Revisedportionare marked in red in the paper.The main correctionsin the paper and the responds to the reviewerscommentsare as flowing:Responds to the reviewer s c

3、omments: Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: ( , 简要列出意见 , ) Response: 2. Response to comment: ( , 简要列出意见 , ) Response: 。逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用： Weare very sorry for our negligence of . Weare very sorry for our incorrec t writing .It is reallytrue as ReviewersuggestedthatWehave madecor

4、rectionaccordingto theReviewer s comments. Wehave re-writtenthispartaccording to the Reviewer s suggestionAs Reviewer suggestedthatConsideringthe Reviewer s suggestion,wehave最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见： Specialthanks toyou foryourgood comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: Other changes:1. Line 60-61, the sta

5、tements of “ ” were corrected as “ ” 2. Line 107, “ ” was added 3. Line 129, “ ” was deleted Wetried our best to improve the manuscript and madesomechanges in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here wedid not listthe changes but marked in red

6、 in revisedpaper.WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers warmwork earnestly,and hope thatthe correction willmeet with approval.Once again,thank you very muchforyour comments and suggestions以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。与大家分享。从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。这些意见分布在文章的各个地方。我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。看到这些意见，我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于

7、提高文章的质量。1 欢迎下载精品文档从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。记得 ACSStyleGuide 里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，这也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。因此：有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。 =Reviewers comments:Reviewer #3: While revisingthe script, itis tobe suggested thatauthor should clearly indicate the aim

8、&scope ofthe study and whilemaking conclusion,it is to be mentioned howthe study is usefulforthe practicalpurposes. In additionthe following are the few suggestions/comments,which maybe included while revision.Introduction part first para last line, author must avoid to write ambiguous statemen t i.

9、e., muchwork is still ahead, mayindicate properly.2.Author couldnot demonstratethe reason why, toselecttheorganiccompound such asethylpyruvateforthisstudy?3.Experimentalpart:It isdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperiments with homemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.More detailedinformationmaybe usefulfo

10、rtheothersthosewhoare workingin the area.Photographofthe assembled cellmaybe included.4.The descriptiongiven fortheexperimentalsetup (page 4) can be presentedby flowdiagraminstead,as an ease to understandthesetup.5.ReslutsPart(Page 6):COadlayerswith identicalmonolayer coverages,themonolayercoverage,

11、isitbeen performedwithsomeadsorptionmodel? Further,it was suggestedthatCO-saturatedPt surface,butnotmentionedabout thesaturationexperiments.Isitobtainedafter60 min of CObubbling?6.Page 12,2nd para:The displacementofEtPy by CCl4 flushing,isitconfirmed by theEtPy peaks? Ifso,ithas tobe mentionedclearl

12、yinthepara.Alsointhe same para,authorreferredforFig.7a and 7b butinthe figures,itdidntappear,only figure7 appeared. Ifeelitrefersforfigure7,portionA and B, tobe corrected.Similarly,inthe textreferredthefig2a, 2b. etcbuton thefiguresheetitis mentioned as 2A, 2B .etc. tobe corrected.7.Page 14,1stpara:

13、contaminationof the Pt surfaceby corrosionof o-ringsinhighconcentrationEtPy,butthe statementhas not been supportedby otherevidence/literature.8.Pages 14 through17: the observedreactivityofvarioussolventsforadsorbedCOon thePt surface(figs3 & 4) has to be discussedmore precisely.This revieweris unable

14、tofollowthereasonwhy theyshowed differentreactivity,isit principallyduetothe organicmoieties,or due totheimpuritiesofcommerciallyavailablechemicalsor a mixed effect.Ithas tobe clearlydemonstrated,however, theonlyexperimentperformed withCO/water? CCl4 would difficultto describeitindetail.。2 欢迎下载精品文档9

15、. The authortrytorestrainwithrepeated argumentsin thetexte.g.,page 3 para 1: It was generalizedthat.,alsoappeared on page 21 firstpara.10. Captionsofthefiguresare too long,thedetaileddescriptionalreadygiven inthe text,hence would not be includedhere.Captionsshouldbe shortand crispy.=Dear Editor,I qu

16、iteappreciateyourfavoriteconsiderationand the reviewers insightfulcomments. NowI have revisedtheJCIS-06-247exactlyaccording tothereviewer s comments, and found thesecommentsare veryhelpful.I hope thisrevisioncan makemypaper more acceptable.The revisionswere addressedpointby pointbelow.general The ob

17、jectiveof this researchwas added at thebeginningof thethirdparagraph of Introduction.Howthe study isusefulforpracticalpurposeswas added at the end of Conclusionas one paragraph.1 Ambiguous statementi.e.,“much work isstillahead” was deleted.2Ethylpyruvatewas used here as a typicalcompound (containing

18、two carbonylgroups) todemonstratethefeasibilityof usingourdiagnosingtoolto detectlow-coverage CO(comingfromdecarbonylationof EtPy) at the liquid-solidinterface.EtPy isa reactantused in liquid-phasechiralcatalysis,and slightdecompositionofEtPy toadsorbed COwas reportedto influencethecatalyticperforma

19、nce.Inaddition,by studyingthat,wecan directlycompare our resultswithpreviousstudies.More detailsin the first paragraph of Section 3.2.3The IR cellwas designedaccordingtotheIR cellsused by manyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswere added. Aphoto was given inthe SupportingInformation.4A flowdiagramof t

20、heexperimentalsetupwas giveninthenewFig.1.5The COadsorptionexperimentswere performedin the sameadsorptionmode, by bubblingCOthrougha clean Pt surfacein differentdays toachievethesamesaturationcoverageof CO. Initialexperimentsindicatedthat giventheCObubblingrate was 0.85 cm3/min,COcan saturateon Pt a

21、fter30-45 min. WebubbleCOfor60 min toguaranteethesameCOcoverage.IfwebubbleCOformore time,or if weincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesnt change,indicating60 min is alreadyenough. A figureshowing theCOuptakeas afunctionofbubblingtime was given intheSupportingInformation.6Th

22、e displacementofEtPy by CCl4 was confirmedby the removingof EtPy peaks. The mention ofFig.7a and 7b etc.throughoutthe textwere allcorrected.。3 欢迎下载精品文档7Itisknown thatsomesolventssuch as acetonecan corrodetheViton o-ring.Wesawthedamageof o-ringafter using high-concentrationEtPy. A referencetothe Vito

23、no-ringinformationwas given.8The observedreactivitytrendisdue toa combination ofbotheffects,withtheaccumulationof organicmoietieson Pt surfaceduringnumerous flushingcycles themore importantreason.A few propersentences were added to claritythis point.9The repeatedargumentsinthefirstparagraphin Sectio

24、n4.3were deleted.10The too-longcaptionswere significantlyshortened.In all,Ifound the reviewers comments are quitehelpful,and I revisedmypaper point-by-point.Thank you and thereviewagain foryour help!=结果：2Ethylpyruvatewas used here as a typicalcompound (containingtwo carbonylgroups) todemonstratethef

25、easibilityof usingourdiagnosingtoolto detectlow-coverage CO(comingfromdecarbonylationof EtPy) at the liquid-solidinterface.EtPy isa reactantused in liquid-phasechiralcatalysis,and slightdecompositionofEtPy toadsorbed COwas reportedto influencethecatalyticperformance.Inaddition,by studyingthat,wecan

26、directlycompare our resultswithpreviousstudies.More detailsin the first paragraph of Section 3.2.3The IR cellwas designedaccordingtotheIR cellsused by manyelectrochemicalworkers.Referenceswere added. Aphoto was given inthe SupportingInformation.4A flowdiagramof the experimentalsetupwas giveninthenew

27、Fig.1.5The COadsorptionexperimentswere performedin the sameadsorptionmode, by bubblingCOthrougha cleanPt surfacein differentdays toachievethesamesaturationcoverageof CO. Initialexperimentsindicatedthat giventheCObubblingrate was 0.85 cm3/min,COcan saturateon Pt after30-45 min. WebubbleCOfor60 min to

28、guaranteethesameCOcoverage.IfwebubbleCOformore time,or ifweincreasetheCOflowingrateseveraltimes,theCOsaturationcoveragedoesnt change,indicating60 min is alreadyenough. A figureshowing theCOuptakeas afunctionofbubblingtime was given intheSupportingInformation.6The displacementofEtPy by CCl4 was confi

29、rmedby the removing of EtPy peaks. The mentionofFig. 7a and 7betc. throughout the textwere all corrected.7Itisknown thatsomesolventssuch as acetonecan corrode the Vitono-ring.Wesawthedamageof o-ringafter usinghigh-concentrationEtPy. A referenceto theViton o-r。4 欢迎下载精品文档inginformationwas given.8The o

30、bservedreactivitytrend isdue toa combination ofbotheffects, withthe accumulationof organicmoietieson Pt surfaceduringnumerous flushing cycles themore importantreason.A few propersentences were added to claritythis point.9The repeatedargumentsinthe firstparagraphin Section4.3were deleted.10The too-lo

31、ngcaptionswere significantlyshortened.In all,Ifound the reviewers comments are quitehelpful,and I revisedmypaper point-by-point.Thank you and thereviewagain foryour help!=结果：CI 修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）Listof ResponsesDear Editorsand Reviewers:Thank you foryour letterand for thereviewers com

32、mentsconcerningour manuscript entitled“ Paper Title” (ID:文章稿号).Those commentsare all valuableand veryhelpfulfor revising and improvingour paper,as wellas theimportantguidingsignificanceto our researches.Wehave studiedcommentscarefullyand have madecorrection which wehope meet with approval. Revisedportionare marked in red inthe paper. The main corrections in the paper and theresponds tothe reviewer s commentsare as flowing:Responds tothe reviewers comments: Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: ( , 简要列出意见 , ) Respo