麦肯锡-石油和天然气的资本支出卓越:应对市场挑战的创新 Oil and Gas Capex excellence in oil and gas Innovations for market challenges_第1页
麦肯锡-石油和天然气的资本支出卓越:应对市场挑战的创新 Oil and Gas Capex excellence in oil and gas Innovations for market challenges_第2页
麦肯锡-石油和天然气的资本支出卓越:应对市场挑战的创新 Oil and Gas Capex excellence in oil and gas Innovations for market challenges_第3页
麦肯锡-石油和天然气的资本支出卓越:应对市场挑战的创新 Oil and Gas Capex excellence in oil and gas Innovations for market challenges_第4页
麦肯锡-石油和天然气的资本支出卓越:应对市场挑战的创新 Oil and Gas Capex excellence in oil and gas Innovations for market challenges_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩11页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Mcsey

&company

OilandGas

Capexexcellenceinoilandgas:

Innovationsformarketchallenges

Novelcapitaldeploymentandprocurementapproachescouldhelpaddressthecurrentchallengeswithintheoilandgasindustry’supstreammarket,leadingtoincreasedvaluecreation.

ThisarticleisacollaborativeeffortbyAlessandroAgosta,GiorgioBresciani,RobertoArgolini,andSamLinder,withLucaRigovaccaandRiccardoBagnara,representingviewsfromMcKinsey’sOil&GasPractice.

©GettyImages

December2024

Likemanyindustries,theupstreamsectoroftheoilandgasindustryisfacingchallengesonseveralfronts:volatilecommoditymarketsdrivinghigher

costinflation,geopoliticalinstabilitycausingsupplychaindisruptions,competitionforconstruction

talentandlaborincertaingeographiessuch

asNorthAmerica,andincreasingpressuretoacceleratebringingnewproductiononline.1

Capitalexpenditure(capex)isrisingasaresult,

callingforcostoptimizationandinnovationin

capitaldeploymentprocessesalongthevalue

chain.Traditionalprocurementmodelsareoftennotagileorresilientenoughtorespondtothe

growingpressuresonupstreamcapitalcostsanddevelopmentspeed,potentiallyaffectingon-timeandon-budgetprojectdelivery.

Tocopewiththisincreasingcomplexity,some

oilandgasplayersareintroducinginnovative

procurementstrategies,suchasexpandingthetraditionalsupplybase,testingnewtendering

models,andadoptingshould-costmethodologyfromotherindustries,suchastheautomotive

sector.2

Thelastapproach,especially,offersapromising

solutionformanagingupstreamcosts:itis

structured,fact-based,andmodelsafairpriceforagivenprojectorservice,consideringboththe

underlyingcostdriversandexpectedmarginsofsuppliersalongthevaluechain.

Inthisarticle,weassessthefactorscausing

inefficiencyintraditionalprocurementmodels

inthecurrentenvironmentandhowupstream

organizationscoulduseprocessinnovationandtheshould-costmethodologytoovercomethem.

Newchallengesarechangingoilandgasprocurement

Theindustry’scapitaldeploymentapproach

requiresarethinktoaddressarangeofchallenges,includingrisingcostsandcompetitionforresources

andcontractorcapacity,thegrowingnumber

ofalternativesupplychainsolutions,andthe

increasingcomplexityofcommercialapproaches.

Highercostsarecausingashiftawayfromtraditionallumpsumapproaches

Fluctuationsinthepriceofrawmaterialshavemadeitdifficultforupstreamoilandgascompaniesto

relyonbenchmarkstosupportthecostestimationofnewcapitalprojectdevelopments.Forexample,thecostofshipbuildinggradesteelin2023

increasedmorethan55percentcomparedto2022prices.3

Akeychallengefacingnewprojectdevelopmentistherecentshifttowardsupplierrisk-sharing

agreementsinprocurementmodels.Followingunprecedenteddisruptions,suchastheCOVID-

19pandemicandanevolvinggeopolitical

environment,suppliersnowtendtopreferrisk-

sharingagreements(forexample,movingfrom

lumpsumcontractstobonus-malusprovisions).4Theserequireupstreamplayerstonegotiatenewcommercialclauses,withlimitedornoexperienceonthepotentialcostimplications,andshiftfromdebtfinancingtowardequityriskcapital,which

comeswithhigherreturnpremiums.

Werecentlyanalyzedasampleofprojectsin

thesectorpresentedatthe20thinternational

conferenceandexhibitiononliquefiednaturalgas,LNG2023.Industryexpertsestimatedthatthe

averagepercentageoftotalbidcostsallocatedtoprovisionalsumversuslumpsumhasdoubledcomparedtothepastfewyears(Exhibit1).

Thesechallengesaredrivingtheneedforsingle-sourcingprocurementapproaches

Therapidlyevolvinglandscapewithitsnew

challenges—includingfastertime-to-market

demandsandthescarcityofsuppliersincertaingeographies—requirestheindustrytofind

innovativesolutionsforstreamliningprocurement.Forexample,recentmarketuncertaintieshave

financiallychallengedmostcontractors,whilelocalcontentruleslimitthespectrumofsuppliersthat

canbeengaged.5

EricArnoHiller,“Whatshoulditcost?,”McKinsey,October5,2017.

1“Howoilandgascompaniescansecuresupply-chainresilience,”McKinsey,March6,2023.2

Bonus-malusreferstoanincentivesystemtoguidecontractorsbyofferingeitherrewardsorpenalties,dependingonperformance.5McKinseyanalysis.

3“OECDCouncilWorkingPartyonshipbuilding(WP6),”OECD,accessedMay2024;“Shipbuilding,”OECD,accessedMay2024.4

2Capexexcellenceinoilandgas:Innovationsformarketchallenges

Exhibit1

Theaveragepercentageoftotalbidcostsallocatedtoprovisionalsumversuslumpsumhasdoubledcomparedtothepastfewyears.

Lumpsumvsprovisionalsum,%oftotalcost-bidLumpsumProvisionalsum

70

55

15

15

85

70

15

15

15

85

15

70

30

Q3/Q420212023

Lumpsum

Contingencyandprofit

Totallumpsum

Initialprovisionalsum

Lumpsumconvertedtoprovisional

Totallumpsumand

provisional

McKinsey&Company

Toaddressthesechallenges,playerscouldstartusingsingle-sourcingprocurementmodels.The“technicalandcommercialpartnership”approach isemergingasanewmethodforsinglesourcingandisbecomingthemostrelevantfortheoilandgasindustry—itisbetterpositionedtodealwith

theincreasingcomplexitiesimpactingcapital

equipmentcostingcomparedtotraditional

approacheslikedesigncompetitionandfixed

designtender(seesidebar,“Procurementmodeltypes”).

Procurementmodeltypes

Singlesourcingthroughtechnicalandcommercialpartnership:Afterarapidmarketscan,apreferredsupplierofchoiceisselectedupfront,andthegranularcostbreakdownisnegotiatedwiththesupplier.

Designcompetition:Afewsuppliersarecalledontoprovideatechnicalandeconomicproposal,withnegotiationsandoptimizationsconductedindependentlytoselectthebestoption.

Fixeddesigntender:Atendertodevelopanupstreamprojectisconductedafterfront-endengineeringdesign(FEED),basedonaninvitationtotenderpackagewhereallsuppliersquoteonthesameengineeringsolution.Thenegotiationonthelumpsumpricetakesplaceafterafulltechnicalalignmentwithallsuppliers.

Capexexcellenceinoilandgas:Innovationsformarketchallenges3

Evolvingprocurementapproachesrequirenewcapabilities

Toleveragenewprocurementapproaches,manyupstreamcompaniesrequireastepupincapabilities.Thisincludesdevelopinganindependentperspectiveonthefaircostofaprojecttorunnegotiationswithsuppliers

successfully.Here,should-costmethodologycanbeusedtosupportsuchnegotiations,asitcan

strengthentheshiftfromalumpsumapproach

tothetechnicalandcommercialpartnership

approach.Thiscanbeachievedbysupporting

informationsymmetrybetweenengineering,

procurement,andconstruction(EPC)companiesandoilandgasoperatorsduringthetechnical

andeconomicoptimizationphases.

Aswellasenablingtheidentificationofmultiple

optimizationlevers(suchasalternativetechnicalsolutions,direct-buyonspecificprocurement

categories,andbroadersupplychainfootprints),wehaveobservedthatshould-costmethodology,coupledwithatechnicalandcommercial

partnershipapproach,canshortenoverall

timelinesforfinalinvestmentdecision(FID).For

projectswithlongbiddingtimes,timetoFIDcouldbereducedbysixtoninemonths,correspondingtoatwo-to-three-monthreductionineachdesignphase(conceptdesign,preliminarydesign,and

FEED)(Exhibit2).

Exhibit2

Should-costwithtechnicalcommercialpartnershipscanreducetime-to-marketbyuptosixtoninemonthsversustraditionalapproaches.

Conductedbycontractor

Conductedby

multiplecontractorsinparallel

Timetofinalinvestmentdecision(FID),byactivityandapproach,

months

Fixeddesigntender

~3~6~9–12

Concept

Preliminary

Front-endengineeringdesign

design

design

Conductedtogetherby

contractorandplantowner

Conductedtogetherbymultiplecontractorsinparallelwith

plantowner

~3

~6

TechnicalalignmentLumpsum

onsingleITT¹packagenegotiation

Designcompetition

~3

~6

~6

Preliminarydesign

~9–12

~3

Front-endengineeringdesign

Conceptdesign

Lumpsumnegotiation

Technicalalignmentwitheachsupplier

Should-costwithtechnicalandcommercialpartnership

~3

~6

Concept

Preliminary

Front-endengineeringdesign

design

design

~9–12

Upto6–9months

savedontimetoFID

Technical,economical,andsupplychainoptimizationwithshould-cost

1Invitationtotender.

McKinsey&Company

4Capexexcellenceinoilandgas:Innovationsformarketchallenges

Inthecourseofourworkwithclientsintheindustry,wehaveobservedhowshould-costcanhelpreducetimeandoptimizeoverallprojectspendingacrosstheoilandgasindustry:

—Afloatingliquefiednaturalgas(LNG)owner

carvedoutsomehullsectionsandtopside

modulesfromthelumpsumagreementto

bidthemoutindependently,achievingcost

optimizationsthroughbest-costsuppliersinnewgeographies.

—Inthemidstreamsector,morethanonecompanyismovingtoconvertiblecontractswithseparateFEEDtomaintaindirect-buyflexibilityonkey

categories.

—Someplayersintheoffshoreindustry,especiallyinregionsexperiencinggeopoliticalinstability,aretakinginsuppliersasequitypartnerstoreduce

riskmarginsthatarepricedintosupply.

—Someoilandgasplayersaredevelopingstrategicpartnershipswithcontractorsbynegotiating

multipleprojectsinthepipelineupfronttoensuretechnicalstandardizationandunlockcross-

projectprocurementsynergies.

Should-costmethodologycreates

informationsymmetrywithEPCs

throughgranularcosttransparency

Should-costmethodologyisemergingasoneof

themostreliablesolutionstohelpupstreamplayersaddresstheircurrentchallenges,providingthe

granularcosttransparencyneededtodealwiththechanginglandscape.Sohowdoesitwork?

Afterbreakingdownthetotalcostofaproject,

product,orserviceintogranularcomponentsand

assessingthecostdriversforeach,companiescan

determinethereasonableshould-costofaserviceorproductbasedonitsconstituentelements.Comparedtotraditionalsolutions(whichlimitthebenchmark

toafinitenumberofpastprojects),should-costcanestimatethecostsassociatedwithanycombinationofdesign,geographicfootprint,andcommercial

agreement.

Initiallydeveloped,fine-tuned,anddeployedat

scaleintheautomotivesector,theshould-cost

methodologyusesbottom-upmodelingofallsupplychaincoststhroughafour-stepapproach:

—Step1:Analyzingthedesignchoicesand2Dor3Ddrawingsoftheprojecttoderiveabillofquantitiesforrawandbulkmaterials.

—Step2:Mappingtheend-to-endvaluechaintoidentifyallthemanufacturingstepsrequiredtoproduceeachcomponent.

—Step3:Costingtherequiredquantitiesand

valuechainstocalculatedirectcosts,leveragingproprietarydatabasesandproductivitymodelstailoredtoeachcountry,technology,andsector.

—Step4:Completingthebottom-upshould-cost

calculationstodefineshould-costcomponents,

includingallelementsofsuppliers’coststructures.

Throughitsflexible,unbiased,andfact-based

methodology,ashould-costanalysiscan,therefore,provideup-to-date,end-to-endtransparencyontheentiresupplychaincoststructureforanupstream

project’stenancyincommon(TIC)investment.6

Toillustrate,weperformedadeepdiveshould-cost

analysisforLNGtanks,providingfulltransparency

onkeycostdriversforfurthernegotiationwiththe

supplier(Exhibit3).Thisanalysisenabledafact-basednegotiationwiththesupplierandledtoan8percent

costreductiononthefinalnegotiatedpricecomparedtotheinitialbid.

Should-costapplicationsintheoilandgasindustry’supstreammarket

Asignificantadvantageoftheshould-cost

methodologyisitsflexibilityintheupstreammarket,makingitdeployablealongmultiplephasesofa

project’stimeline—fromconceptdesigntoFIDandcommissioning.Thisallowscompaniestomake

informedinvestmentdecisionsandallocatecapitalmoreefficiently.

6

Tenancyincommoninvestmentmeansthatonceconstructed,aplantwillberunbymultipleownersandstakeholderswhoaresharingtheinvestment.

Capexexcellenceinoilandgas:Innovationsformarketchallenges5

Exhibit3

Anexampleofashould-costmodelforhullandLNGtanksgivesanoutputwithfulltransparencyonLNGtanks’costdrivers.

Illustrativeshould-costmodelforhullandLNGtanks

Keyspecifications

•Numberoftanks:8

•Tanksize:~30metrictons(mt)×~25mt×~40mt

•Insulationmaterialthickness:~300mm

•Overallstoragecapacity:~250km

Should-cost,%020406080100

MaterialRawmaterial

Purchasedmaterials

Totalmaterials

Detail

Rawmaterials

•304lstainlesssteel:$2.0/kg

•ReinforcedPUfoam:$2.6/kg

•Birchplywood(9mm):$12.2/m

ProductionLabor

Machinery

Batchsetup,scrap,andtooling

Manufacturingoverhead

Totalmanufacturing

Labor

•Average$55/hourrateforskilledworkerinSouthKorea

Machinery—mainmanufacturingsteps

•Masticapplicationequipment:~$55/hour

•Weldingandtrimming:~$150/hour

•Shotblasting:~$90/hour

•3,600toncrane:~$0.1million/downtimeday

•Testingandassembly:~$120/hour

IndirectOverhead(SG&A,¹R&D)

Profit

Outboundlogistics

Indirect

•SG&A:8%

•R&D:4%

•Qualificationandcertification:12%

•Profit:4%

•Outboundlogistics:2%

Totalshould-cost

1Selling,general,andadministrative.

Source:McKinseyCleansheetDatabase

McKinsey&Company

Theshould-costmethodologyhasbenefitsacross

multipleapplications.Theycanleadtomore

effectivenegotiationsbetweensuppliersandoilandgasoperatorsduetoimprovedinformation

sharing,allowingoperatorstopinpointtheir

effortsonhigh-potentialcostcategories.The

methodologycanenablefasterandmorefactualdecisionmakingalongtheprocurementprocess,fromassessingdesignalternativestoselecting

optimalsupplychainstructuresandinvestmentdecisions.

Theshould-costmethodologycanincreaseoverallprofitability,too,typicallyforbothoperatorsand

suppliers,giventheopportunitiesforidentifyingandtacklinginefficiencies.Thisanalysisalso

hasspecificapplicationswhereend-to-end

transparencyonthesupplychainiskeytosecuring

6Capexexcellenceinoilandgas:Innovationsformarketchallenges

andcreatingvalueinprojectdelivery.Specificinstanceswherethesebenefitscanberealizedinclude:

First-of-a-kindprojects:In-house

benchmarkingcanbechallengingforinnovative,

newtechnologiesduetothelackofproject

precedence.Should-costcanprovideasoundsolutiontothisproblembyindependently

modelingtheexpectedcostsofthesenewtechnologies.

Stakeholderalignmentoninvestment

costs:Should-costcansupportfact-based

discussions,approvals,andnegotiationswith

complexstakeholders—suchasgovernments

orinvestmentpartners—byprovidingdetailed

transparencyoncostdriversforspecificprojects.

Assessmentofasupplier’slearningcurve

whenrealizingpastprojectreplicas:Should-costmodelscanhelpassesspastproject

learnings,determiningwhichactivitiesshouldbereplicatedandwhichcanbeacceleratedoravoided.Forexample,inourexperience,oneoilandgasorganizationthatappliedthisapproachwasabletoquantifythisreplicaeffectinmorethan10percentoftotalprojectcosts.

Quantificationofpriceevolutionsinhighly

volatilemarkets:Should-costcanprovidefull

transparencyonprojectcostbreakdownsand

enabletheoverallprojectpricetobelinkedto

theevolutionofunderlyingmarketindexes(suchasforrawmaterialsorlaborcost).Anoilandgascompanyharnessedthisapproachtodynamicallymodelthepriceevolutionofamegaprojectbasedonmorethan35inflationindexes.

Assessmentoflocalconstraintimplications:

Severalcountrieshavetightconstraintsonthe

incidencethatlocalactivitiescanhaveonthe

overallprojectprice.7Basedonlocalcountryrisks,should-costcanquantifytheeconomicvalueof

requiredriskmitigationactions—orexpectedsuppliers’contingencies.

Trade-offanalysisforsupplychain

optimization:Should-costcansimulateexpectedcostsfordifferentsupplychain

structures.Forexample,anoilandgasoperator

wantedtodetermineifitshouldmovethe

constructionoftopsidemodulesforavesselto

anothercountry.Inlessthantwoweeks,should-costmodeledthevariationsinlogisticsandlaborcostsbetweenthetwocountries,leadingthe

operatortoconcludethatit,infact,shouldnotswitchcountries.

Contractstrategydefinition:Should-cost

analysiscansupportthedefinitionofacontract’stermsandconditions(T&Cs),optimizingeconomicandcontractualvalue.Thiscanbedoneby

modelingtheexpectedextracostandriskbuffersthatthesupplierwouldneedtoincurtocomply

withthecontractualT&Cs.

Claimmanagement:Should-costcanbe

employedtoassessthefairvalueofapotentialsupplier’sclaimsafterthelaunchofthe

constructionphase.Suppliers’quotationscanbecomparedandthennegotiatedbymodelingtheexpecteddeltapriceofagivenvariation.

Pricerenegotiations:Ifneeded,should-cost

cansupporttheeconomicevaluationofbonus-

malusprovisions.Bycalculatingcostsbottom-upwithquantitiesandunitaryprices,should-cost

allowsoperatorstoquantitivelydetermineifcostsincurredduringproductionarethesameasthosedeterminedinthebid.Throughcomparison,theycanthenworkoutifthereisacorresponding

bonusormalusprovision.

Consistentlycapturingshould-costbenefitsrequiresnewcapabilitieswithintheorganization

Whileshould-costapplicationcomeswithundisputedbenefitsintermsofcapital

deploymentoptimizationandtime-to-marketreduction,toconsistentlycapturethem,oil

andgasplayersarerequiredtobuilddedicated

7

McKinseyanalysis.

Capexexcellenceinoilandgas:Innovationsformarketchallenges7

capabilitieswithintheorganization.Throughourworkwithorganizationswithinandbeyondtheoilandgasindustry,wehaveidentifiedthreetypicalmodels—buy,hybrid,andmake—thatcompaniesusetostepuptheirshould-costcapabilities.

Buysolution:Abuysolutionresultsinthecompleteexternalizationofshould-cost

modelingforallpurchasecategories,withan

externalpartnerusedforeveryneed.Thetype

ofcompaniesthatcouldadoptthismodelcould

bepurchasersofsophisticatedsyste

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论