世界银行-冲突十年后阿拉伯叙利亚共和国货币贫困程度评估_第1页
世界银行-冲突十年后阿拉伯叙利亚共和国货币贫困程度评估_第2页
世界银行-冲突十年后阿拉伯叙利亚共和国货币贫困程度评估_第3页
世界银行-冲突十年后阿拉伯叙利亚共和国货币贫困程度评估_第4页
世界银行-冲突十年后阿拉伯叙利亚共和国货币贫困程度评估_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩75页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

PublicDisclosureAuthorizedPublicDisclosureAuthorized

PolicyResearchWorkingPaper10736

AssessingtheExtentofMonetaryPoverty

intheSyrianArabRepublicafteraDecade

ofConflict

SilviaRedaelli

MichelleInfanzon

LauraLilianaMorenoHerrera

WORLDBANKGROUP

PovertyandEquityGlobalPractice

March2024

PolicyResearchWorkingPaper10736

Abstract

ThedataforestimatingmonetarypovertyintheSyrianArabRepublicareoutdated.Inthecontextofdatascar-city,thispaperaimstoproposeamethodologicalapproachtoaddresstheknowledgegapregardingwelfareinSyriaoverthepastdecade.Inparticular,theanalysisprovides(i)updatedpre-conflictpovertybaselineestimatesbasedongroupeddatafromthe2009HouseholdIncomeandExpenditureSurvey;(ii)supportingevidenceontheviabil-ityofusingHumanitarianNeedsAssessmentProgrammeDemographicandWaterSupply,Sanitation,andHygiene2022surveydatafortheestimationofmonetarypovertyin2022;and(iii)supportingtheoreticalandempirical

evidencetoidentifygrowthinpercapitagrossdomesticproductincurrentpricesdeflatedbyConsumerPriceIndexasthebestmetrictoprojectpovertyusinganowcastingapproach.Basedonthisanalysis,thepaperproposestouse2022HumanitarianNeedsAssessmentProgramme–basedpovertyestimatestoanchorthemostrecentestimatestothebestavailableevidence,andtointerpolatethepovertyevolutionobtainedfromback-casting2022andnowcasting2009povertyestimatesover2009–22usingthegrowthrateofpercapitagrossdomesticproductincurrentprices,deflatedbytheConsumerPriceIndexwithapassthroughof0.7.

ThispaperisaproductofthePovertyandEquityGlobalPractice.ItispartofalargereffortbytheWorldBanktoprovideopenaccesstoitsresearchandmakeacontributiontodevelopmentpolicydiscussionsaroundtheworld.PolicyResearchWorkingPapersarealsopostedontheWebat

/prwp.Theauthorsmaybecontacted

atsredaelli@.

ThePolicyResearchWorkingPaperSeriesdisseminatesthefindingsofworkinprogresstoencouragetheexchangeofideasaboutdevelopmentissues.Anobjectiveoftheseriesistogetthefindingsoutquickly,evenifthepresentationsarelessthanfullypolished.Thepaperscarrythenamesoftheauthorsandshouldbecitedaccordingly.Thefindings,interpretations,andconclusionsexpressedinthispaperareentirelythoseoftheauthors.TheydonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheInternationalBankforReconstructionandDevelopment/WorldBankanditsaffiliatedorganizations,orthoseoftheExecutiveDirectorsoftheWorldBankorthegovernmentstheyrepresent.

ProducedbytheResearchSupportTeam

AssessingtheExtentofMonetaryPoverty

intheSyrianArabRepublicafteraDecade

ofConflict

SilviaRedaelli

sredaelli@

MichelleInfanzon

minfanzonguadarr@

LauraLilianaMorenoHerrera

lmorenoherrera@

JELcodes:I32–MeasurementandAnalysisofPoverty

Keywords:povertymeasurement,povertynowcasting,fragilityandconflict,datadeprivation

Contents

Introduction 4

1Updatingpre-conflictpovertyestimates 6

2Post-conflictpovertyprojections:Reviewofexistingestimates 8

2.1Post-conflictestimatesbasedonnowcastingmethodologies 8

2.2Post-conflictestimatesbasedonHNAP2021DemographicandWASHsurvey 10

2.2.1MeasureofwelfareusedinHNAPanalysis 11

2.2.2PovertylineusedinHNAPanalysis 13

3PovertyestimationusingtheHNAP2022DemographicandWASHHouseholdSurvey 13

3.1Improvementstothesurvey’sexpendituremodule 14

3.2MonetarypovertyestimatesbasedontheHNAP2022DemographicandWASHsurvey 15

4NowcastingmonetarypovertyinSyria:Challengesandsensitivityanalysis 19

4.1Datachallenges 19

4.1.1Measuring“growth” 19

4.1.2Populationestimates 21

4.2Distributionneutralpovertyprojections:Sensitivityanalysis 22

5Triangulatingpovertyprojectionswithavailableevidence 26

6Proposedwayforward 28

References 29

Annex1:Post-ConflictPovertyEstimationStudiesinSyria 31

Annex2:TheHumanitarianNeedsAssessmentProgramme(HNAP) 33

Annex3:GeospatialpopulationestimatesforSyria 36

Annex4:DistributionneutralpovertyprojectionsusingprivatepercapitaconsumptionfromNA 38

Annex5:DistributionneutralpovertyprojectionsusingGDPpercapita,andpovertylinesat2011PPP.41

Figure1:FCVPass-throughrateforSyria2009-2020 9

Figure2:Shareofpopulationinextremepoverty,bysubdistrict(HNAPextremepovertydefinition) 11

Figure3:Contributiontototalhouseholdmonetaryincome,bysource 12

Figure4:Averagehouseholdincomeandshareofhouseholdsreportingincomesufficiency,by

governorate 12

Figure5:Distributionofmonthlypercapitaexpenditure,nominalandspatiallyadjusted 17

Figure6:Distributionbygovernorateandquintilesofspatiallyadjustedandnominalmonthlypercapita

expenditure 17

Figure7:Governoratelevelpovertyestimatesbasedonnominalandspatiallyadjustedwelfare 18

Figure8:PovertyestimatesbasedonHNAP2022data,nominalaggregate 18

Figure9:GDPdeflatorandCPIgrowthindex(2003=100) 21

Figure10:PopulationestimatesforSyria 22

Figure11:SensitivityAnalysisofPovertyProjectionsatLICextremepovertyline($2.15,2017PPP) 23

Figure12:SensitivityAnalysisofPovertyatLMICinternationalpovertyline($3.65,2017PPP) 23

Figure13:PovertyProjectionsatLICextremepovertyline($2.15,2017PPP)andgrowthbasedonGDP

currentprices(CPIadjusted)and2009povertybaselineusingdifferentpassthroughrates 25

Figure14:PovertyProjectionsatLMICinternationalpovertyline($3.65,2017PPP)andgrowthbasedon

GDPcurrentprices(CPIadjusted)and2009povertybaselineusingdifferentpassthroughrates 25

Figure15:BenchmarkingofpovertyestimatesforSyria,2020 26

Figure16:Trendsinnight-timelightemissions 27

Figure17:Povertytrends2009-2022 28

Table1:Officialpovertyrateandnationalpovertylines 6

Table2:Povertyestimatesusingincomeclassinternationalpovertylines 7

Table3:ComparativeOverviewofPost-ConflictPovertyEstimationStudiesinSyria 9

Table4:Expendituremoduleofthe2021and(revised)2022DemographicandWASHsurvey 14

Table5:Analysisofrelationbetweenfoodshareandtotalhouseholdexpenditure 15

Table6:SpatialpricedeflatorbasedonWFPStandardFoodBasket(SFB) 16

Table7:Nationalpovertyestimatesbasedonnominalandspatiallyadjustedwelfare 17

Table8:RatioofsurveyhouseholdconsumptiontoPrivateConsumptionandGDP 19

Table9:Averageannualgrowthrate2003-2009 20

Table10:Comparisonbetweenbaselinepovertyestimatesandprojectionsin2009 24

Introduction

Morethanadecadeofconflicthashaddevastatingsocio-economicconsequencesfortheSyrianArabRepublic.In2011Syriawasafast-growingmiddle-incomecountry.Fastforward10years,Syriaisalow-incomecountrystillengulfedinviolenceandstrugglingwithadeepeconomiccrisis.Conflicthasclaimedthelivesofatleast350,209individuals

1

andmorethanhalfofSyria’spre-conflictpopulationremainsdisplaced,including6.6millionIDPsinSyriaand6.2millionSyrianrefugeesdisplacedabroad.Between2011and2019,theSyrianeconomyisestimatedtohavecontractedbymorethan50percentinrealterms.Overthesameperiod,extremepovertyisprojectedtohaveincreasedmanyfold,reflectingdeteriorationoflivelihoodopportunitiesandprogressivedepletionofhouseholdcopingcapacity.

2

Overthelastfouryears,thenegativewelfareimpactofconflicthasbeenfurtherexacerbatedbyregionalandglobalshocks.TheconflictinSyriahasexacerbatedthecountry’svulnerabilitytoexternalshocks.TheintensificationofUSsanctionsontheIslamicRepublicofIranafterthecollapseoftheNuclearTreatyinNovember2018impactedSyrianimportsofIranianfuel,leadingtopetrolandgasshortageswhichsparkedsharppriceincreasesforbothfoodandnon-fooditemsinearly2019.Moreover,thefinancialcrisisinLebanonbyend2019hadrippleeffectsontheSyrianeconomy,furthercontributingtosoaringprices.

3

TheCOVID-19crisisanddroughtconditionsintheNortheasternregion,Syria’straditionalbreadbasketwhichisstillheavilyaffectedbyconflictandnewwavesofpopulationdisplacement,furthercontributedtothefoodsecuritychallengeoftheSyrianpopulation.AsofFebruary2022,beforethewarinUkraine,WFPestimatesthat12millionpeople,about55percentoftheSyrianpopulation,werefacingacutefoodinsecurity,up51percentcomparedto2019.

HouseholdwelfareanalysisinSyriaisseverelyconstrainedbydataavailability.Similartootherconflict-affectedcountries,estimatesofthelivingstandardsoftheSyrianpopulationareoutdatedduetothelackofofficialandcomparablehouseholdbudgetsurveysaftertheonsetofwar.ThelatestofficialhouseholdbudgetsurveydataavailableontheWorldBank’sPovertyandInequalityPlatform(PIP)

4

datesbackto2003,despitetheexistenceoftwomorerecentbudgetsurveysconductedbySyria’sStatisticalOfficein2007and2009.

5

Assuch,theWorldBankhasnotbeenpublishingpovertyestimatesforSyriapost2003.

1EstimatesofthetotaldeathtolloftheSyrianwarvarydependingonthemethodologyandreportingagency.In2021,theUN’shumanrightsoffice(OHCHR)releasedatallyof

350,200deaths

includingbothciviliansandcombatants.Thecountisbasedonastrictmethodologyrequiringthedeceased’sfullname,dateofdeathandlocationofthebodyandshouldthereforebeinterpretedasanunder-estimationoftheactualnumberofwar-relateddeaths.TheSyrianObservatoryforHumanRights(SOHR)estimatesanoveralldeathtollof

610,000people

over11yearsofconflict,ofwhich160,681arerepresentedbycivilians(120,158men,15,237womenand25,286children).

2ESCWA(2020)“Syriaatwar:eightyearson”,UnitedNationsEconomicandSocialCommissionforWesternAsia,Beirut,2020.

3Syrians,especiallytraders,havebeendependingonbanksinLebanonforaccessingforeigncurrency(dollars).However,duetothefinancialcrisisinLebanonandwithLebanesebankslimitingthereleaseoffunds,manySyrianshavelostaccesstotheirsavings.TheheavilyreducedreleaseofcashfromLebanesebankshasmeantthatdollarshavebecomescarceinSyria,pushing-uptheinformalmarketexchangerate.Asaresult,pricesoffoodandnon-fooditemshaverisenacrossSyria.

4ThePovertyandInequalityPlatform(PIP)isapubliclyavailabledatasetofWorldBank’sofficialcountry-level,regional,andglobalestimatesofpoverty.MostofthedatainPIPcomesfromtheGlobalMonitoringDatabase,whichistheWorldBank’srepositoryofharmonizedmultitopicincomeandexpenditurehouseholdsurveysusedtomonitorglobalpoverty.PIPcontainsmorethan2,000surveysfrom168countriescovering98%oftheworld’spopulation.ThedataavailableinPIParestandardizedasfaraspossiblebutdifferencesexistwithregardstothemethodofdatacollection,andwhetherthewelfareaggregateisbasedonincomeorconsumption.

5ThesesurveyswereusedbyUNDPandESCWAtoestimatenationalpovertyestimates(seeAbu-Ismail,Abdel-GhadirandEl-Laithy(2011)“PovertyandInequalityinSyria1997-2007”,ArabDevelopmentChallengesReport,Backgroundpaper2011/05).

Still,lineupestimatesofpovertyinSyriabasedonadistributionneutralnowcastingapproachusinggrowthinHouseholdFinalConsumptionExpenditure(HFCE–constantprices,unit-passthrough)havesofarbeenusedfortheproductionofglobalandregionalpovertyestimates.

Inthecontextofdatascarcity,thispaperaimstoproposeamethodologicalapproachtoaddresstheknowledgegapregardingwelfareinSyriaoverthelastdecade.Inparticular,theobjectiveofthispaperisto(i)filltheknowledgegapontheextentofmonetarypovertypre-conflictusinginternationalpovertylinesfor2007and2009;(ii)assessthestrengthsandweaknessesofpovertyestimatesbasedonhouseholdsurveydatacollectedin2021and2022undertheHumanitarianNeedsAssessmentProgramme(HNAP);(iii)conductasensitivityanalysisofdistributionneutralnowcastingapproaches,identifyingthemostcredibleapproachgivenNAdatalimitations;(iv)triangulateestimatesobtainedthroughvariousapproacheswithindirectevidenceoneconomicactivitybasedongeoreferenceddata;andlastly(v)proposeamethodologicalapproachtoassesstheevolutionofmonetarypovertyinSyriaduringtheconflictperiod.

1Updatingpre-conflictpovertyestimates

OfficialpovertyestimatesforSyriaareavailablefor1997,2003and2007andproducedwithUNDPtechnicalassistance.PovertymeasurementbuildsonnationallyrepresentativehouseholdbudgetsurveydatafromtheHouseholdIncomeandExpenditureSurveys(HIES)conductedbytheCentralBureauforStatistics(CBS–theofficialstatisticalagencyinSyria).

6

CBSconductedanotherroundoftheHIESin2009-10,butnopovertyestimateswerereleased.Sincetheconflicteruptedin2011,nonewroundsofHIESwereconducted.

ThemethodologyadoptedbyUNDPtocomputeofficialpovertyestimatesbuildsontheconstructionof“household-specificpovertylines”,reflectingcaloricrequirementswhichvarybyhouseholdcompositionandregionalvariationinthecostpercaloryandnon-foodallowance.

7

Twodifferentpovertythresholdsareconsidered,onereflectingbasicneeds(referredtoasthe“extreme”or“lower”povertyline–henceforthLPL)andamoregenerousonereflectinga“reasonable”levelofbasicneeds(referredtoasthe“moderate”or“upper”povertyline–henceforthHPL).TheLPL–onceexpressedinUSDusingthe2011PPPconversionfactor–isclosetotheinternationalpovertylineforlower-middle-incomecountries($3.65at2011PPP),whiletheUPLisclosetotheoneforupper-middle-incomecountries.

Table1

belowsummarizestheavailablepovertyestimates.

Table1:Officialpovertyrateandnationalpovertylines

LowerPovertyline(LPL)UpperPovertyline(UPL)

LowerPovertyline(LPL)

UpperPovertyline(UPL)

199720032007

Povertyrate(%)

14.2611.3912.3

33.2230.1333.6

Nationalaverageofhouseholdspecificpovertylines-SYPpermonth

NA14582183

($3.6daily,2011PPP)($3.9daily,2017PPP)

($4.2daily,2011PPP)($4.6daily,2017PPP)

NA

2052

($5.1daily,2011PPP)($5.5daily,2017PPP)

3037

($5.8daily,2011PPP)($6.4daily,2017PPP)

Source:Abu-Ismailetal.(2011);ElLaithy,Abu-Ismail(2005).WorldBankstaffestimatesfor2011PPPconversion.

Notes:SYPvalueofthepovertylinesisexpressedincurrentprices.Daily2011PPPvalueofthePLprovidedinparenthesisforreference.

Atpresent,theWorldBankPovertyandInequalityPlatform(PIP)onlyincludespovertyestimatesatinternationalpovertylinesfor2003,theonlyyearforwhichmicrodataareavailableintheGlobalPovertyMonitoringDatabase.However,buildingontabulationsavailableinAbu-Ismailetal.(2011)andontheCBSwebsite,itispossibletogatherallrelevantinformationtocomputegrouped-datapovertyestimatesatinternationalpovertylinesfor2007andfor2009,hencetoupdatetheavailablepre-conflictbaselinepovertyseries

(Box1)

.

6InformationfromtheHIES1997wascollectedbetweenOctober1996andSeptember1997;fortheHIES2003informationwascollectedbetweenJuly2003andJune2004;fortheHIES2007,informationwascollectedbetweenNovember2006andOctober2007.

7ElLaithy,Abu-Ismail(2005).

Box1:Groupeddatapovertyestimates

Groupeddataareconsumptionexpenditureorincomeorganizedinintervalsorbins,suchasdecilesorpercentiles.ThesebinsareusedtoderiveacontinuousLorenzcurve,whichplotsthecumulativewelfareshare(onthey-axis)againstthecumulativepopulationshare(onthex-axis).Togetherwithinformationaboutmeanwelfare,theLorenzcurvecanbeusedtoconstructafulldistribution.TwoapproachesareusedtoderiveaLorenzfunction,thegeneralquadratic(GQ)LorenzfunctionandtheBetaLorenzfunction(Datt1998).Bothfunctionsareparameterizedandestimated.Thefunctionthatprovidesthebestfitisselectedforpovertyanddistributionalstatistics,conditionalonpassingnormalityandvaliditytests.TheGQLorenzfunctionisestimatedusingthefollowingspecification:

L(1−L)=a(p2−L)+bL(p−1)+c(p−L),

wherepisthecumulativeproportionofthepopulation,Listhecumulativeproportionofconsumptionexpenditureorincome,anda,b,careparameterestimates.Povertyandinequalitymeasuresarebasedontheparameterestimates.

TheBetaLorenzfunctionisestimatedusingthefollowingspecification:

L(p)=p−θpγ(1−p)δ,

whereθ,γ,andδareparameterestimates.

Themethodologytoestimatepovertystartingfromgroupeddataisappliedongroupeddatainformationonperhouseholdconsumptionbydecileofthewelfaredistributionin2007andin2009HIESavailablefromtheCBSwebsite.Informationonaveragehouseholdsizebydecile,whichisneededtoconverthouseholdexpenditureinpercapitaterms,wasobtainedfromProf.HebaEl-Laithy,oneoftheauthorsoftheAbu-Ismailetal.(2011)studywhowasinpossessionof2007HIESmicrodata.Throughthisconsultancy,groupeddatapovertyestimatesfor2007werecomparedandvalidatedwithestimatesbasedonthefulldistribution.Lackinginformationonaveragehouseholdsizebydecilefor2009,percapitaexpenditurebydecilein2009isobtainedusing2007estimates.

Source:

PovertyandInequalityPlatformMethodologyHandbook

Table2

belowreportsgroupeddataestimatesofpovertyincidenceatdifferentvaluesofinternationalpovertylinesfor2007andfor2009.Basedongrouped-dataestimationapproach,in2009,thelatestyearforwhichdataareavailablebeforeconflictstarted,Syria’spovertyatLMICwas14.50percentusing2011PPPand16.02percentusing2017PPP,whereascorrespondingestimatesbasedontheUMICpovertylinewere40.29percent(2011PPP)and47.52percent(2017PPP).Whencomparingto2007group-basedestimates,evidencesuggeststhatpovertyhadstagnated,possiblyreflectingtheimpactofthedroughtthataffectedthecountryovertheperiod.

Table2:Povertyestimatesusingincomeclassinternationalpovertylines

PovertyRate(%)

PPP

PLvalue

Estimatesbasedonmicrodata

Estimatesbasedongrouped-data

2003

20072009

LIC

2011

1.9

0.79

2.43

2.08

2017

2.15

0.93

2.83

2.44

LMIC

2011

3.2

9.48

14.90

14.50

2017

3.65

10.89

16.36

16.02

UMIC

2011

5.5

38.37

39.47

40.29

2017

6.85

47.26

46.43

47.52

Source:WorldBankstaffestimates

2Post-conflictpovertyprojections:Reviewofexistingestimates

2.1Post-conflictestimatesbasedonnowcastingmethodologies

Nowcastingmethodologiesaretypicallyusedtofilldatagapsincountriesthatlackup-to-datesurvey-basedpovertyestimates.Nowcastingapproachesvaryintermsofbothmethodologicalassumptionsaswellasintermsofdatasourcesusedintheanalysis.

Thesimplestnowcastingapproach–whichisusedbytheWorldBankintheproductionofglobalpovertyestimates–reliesoninformationfromnationalaccounts(percapitaGDPorhouseholdfinalconsumptionexpenditure)topredictpoverty.Morespecifically,thisnowcastingmethodologyassumesthatgrowth(orshrinkage)inGDPpercapitaregisteredsincethecountry’slastpovertyestimateisfullypassedthroughtotheconsumptionvectorthatismeasuredinhouseholdsurveys(Prydzetal.2019).Povertyisthenestimatedusingthispredictedconsumptionvectorundera“distributionneutral”assumptioni.e.,assumingthatinequalitydoesnotchangeatthateachindividualisequallyaffectedbythegrowth/contractioninwelfare.Whiletheimpactofgrowthonpovertyreductioniswell-known(Kraay,2006;FerreiraandRavallion,2009),concernshaveemergedrelatedtopossibleun-reliabilityofGDPmeasuresindevelopingcountries(Angrist,2022),aswellastheextenttowhichgrowthispassedthroughtowelfareinfragileandconflictaffectedcountries

(Box2)

.

Box2:Growthratepass-throughinFCSEconomies

Theassumptionoffullpass-throughworksfairlywellineconomiesthatarenotinFragileandConflict-AffectedSituations(FCS).However,availableevidencesuggeststhatafullpassthroughassumptionislikelyinappropriateincaseofconflict.

Inordertoestimateanydifferenceinpass-throughinFCSsettings,Corraletal.(2020)fittedaregressionmodelonasampleincludingallcountriesforwhichsurveyconsumptionestimatesareavailableinPIPovertheperiod2000to2019.Inparticular,theannualizedgrowthrateinthesurveypercapitaconsumptionisregressedonannualizedgrowthinGDPpercapita,togetherwithaninteractionofannualizedgrowthinGDPpercapitaandtheshareoftime(ifany)thateachcountryspentasFCSbetween2000and2019.

GTowthsuTveymean=0.964*GTowthGDppeTcapita−0.530*GTowthGDppeTcapita*ShaTeFCS

Accordingtothismodel,foreconomiesthathaveneverbeenFCS,96percentofGDPgrowthispassedthroughtowelfare.However,foreconomiesthathavebeeninFCSthroughouttheentireperiod,only43percent(0.64-0.30)ispassedthrough.

Thereducedpass-throughrateindicatesthatineconomiesexperiencingconflict,violence,orfragility,changesinnationalaccountsarelargerthanchangesinwelfare.Inparticular,foreconomiesinFCSwhereGDPpercapitadeclined,thisimpliesthatthepovertyratesestimatedusingthisadjustedpass-throughwouldbelowercomparedtothoseestimatedunderafullpass-throughassumption.

1.00

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00

Shareoftimesince2009asFCSPass-throughRate

Figure1:FCVPass-throughrateforSyria2009-2020

Source:Corraletal.(2020)

Analternativenowcastingapproach,whichbypassesthedistributionneutralassumption,reliesongrowthelasticitiesofpoverty(GEP).Growthelasticitiesofpovertyrevealthepercentagechangeinpovertyassociatedtoa1percentgrowthinGDPpercapita.Implicitly,theelasticitytakesintoaccountboththeimpactofgrowthonaveragewelfareaswellaschangesinthedistributionofwelfare(Shorrocks,2013;DattandRavallion,1992).Still,thisapproachreliesonthestrongassumptionthattherelationbetweengrowthandpovertydoesnotchangeovertime.

Insomecases,povertynowcastingbuildsonmorearticulatedmicrosimulationmodels.Morecomplexexamplesofmicrosimulationmodelsarebasedoncomputablegeneralequilibrium(CGE)orgeneralequilibriummacroeconomicmodelsthatrelyonsocialaccountingmatricesortimeseriesmacroeconomicdatatocreate“linkageaggregatevariables”(LAVs)thatarefedintomicrosimulationmodelsthatbuildonhouseholdsurveydata.However,thehighinformationdemandsofthesemodelsmakesthemhardtoapplyindatadeprivedcontexts.Alessdatademandingapproachtomicrosimulationreliesonbuildingbehavioralmodelsonhouseholdsurveys(typicallylinkinglabormarketoutcomesandremittancestoindividualandhouseholds’incomesandconsumption)whicharethenlinkedtoaggregateandsectorlevelmacro-economicprojections.

8

Table3

belowprovidesasummaryoftheresultsandmethodologiesemployedinthelimitednumberofstudiesthathaveattemptedtoestimatepovertyinSyriaduringthepost-conflictperiod.Despitetheirnotablelimitations,allthesestudiesconsistentlyindicatesubstantialincreasesinpoverty.

9

Table3:Comparati

Author

veOverviewofPost-ConflictPov

Povertyline

ertyEstimationStudiesinSyria

Estimates

Methodologicalapproach

WorldBank(2017)

LowernationalPL(LPL)

2007:12.3%

2016:54.5–66.5%

Extrapolationusingagrowthelasticityofpoverty

estimatedovertheperiod2003-2007.

ESCWA(2016)

LowernationalPL(LPL)

UppernationalPL(UPL)

2010:14%;2015:50%

2010:28%;2015:83.4%

NA

ESCWA

(2020b)

$1.90(2011PPP)intlPL

$3.50(2011PPP)intlPL

2010:<1%;2019:40%

2010:19%;2019:77%

Distributionneutral

projectionsbasedonthe

growthofprivatehousehold

8Olivierietal.(2014).

9ForadetaileddescriptionofeachstudyseeAnnex1.

consumptionpercapita

fromNA;unitpass-through

Hamati(2018)

LowernationalPL(LPL)

UppernationalPL(UPL)

2009:14.9%;2015:85.8-75.9%

2009:29.4%;2015:93.1%-87.5%

Dynamicmicrosimulationmodelprojectionsthat

introduceprice,

demographic,labormarket,andincomeshocks.

2.2Post-conflictestimatesbasedonHNAP2021DemographicandWASHsurvey

ThescaleofSyria’shumanitariancrisisandthenecessitytoinformoperationsonthegroundhaspromptedUNagenciestodevelopanarticulatedsystemofwelfaremonitoring:theHumanitarianNeedsAssessmentProgramme(HNAP).TheHNAPisajointUNprogramestablishedinApril2018withtheobjectiveoftrackingdisplacementandreturnmovements,conductingmulti-sectoralassessments,andmonitoringhumanitarianneedsinsidethecountry.

10

Inadditiontocollectingdataatthecommunitylevelthroughkeyinformantinterviews,theHNAPalsoimplementedsample-basedhouseholdsurveyswhoseframereliesoncommunitylevelpopulationdata.

11

TheHNAPDemographicandWASHsurveyisalarge-scalesurveyaimedatprovidingnationalandsub-national-levelestimatesofdemographicandbasicsocio-economicconditionsofthepopulationlivinginsideSyria(resident,IDPsandreturnees).Thesurveyisprimarilyusedtoinformtheprog

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

最新文档

评论

0/150

提交评论