版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
04MARCH2024
ISSUE04/2024
WORKINGPAPER
GLOBALSUPPLYCHAINS:
LESSONSFROMADECADE
OFDISRUPTION
LUCALÉRYMOFFATANDNICLASFREDERICPOITIERS
Thispaperexploresboththecharacterandimpactofthreerecentshockstoglobalsupplychains:theCOVID-19pandemic,theRussianinvasionofUkraineandtheUS-China
tradewar.Thesewerelargeshockswhichhavehadsignificantimpactsondomesticand
internationalsupplychains,buttheseimpactshavedifferedintheirlongevity,economic
impactandpolicyresponses.Weshowthatsupplychainswereremarkablyresilientagainstshocksofsuchmagnitude.However,thisresiliencewasalsoachievedthankstotheequallyremarkablesizeandscopeofpolicyresponsesandglobalsupplychainreorganisation.
Werecommendthatpre-emptivepoliciesmaybejustifiedtoshieldhouseholdsandindustryfromfutureshocks.Giventheentanglednatureoftheseshocksandthattheireffectscontinuetoreverberate,weemphasisetheneedforextensivefutureresearchtounderstandthenatureoftheseshocksandtheeffectivenessofpolicyresponses.
LucaLéryMoffat(luca.moffat@)isaResearchAnalystatBruegelNiclasPoitiers(niclas.poitiers@)isaResearchFellowatBruegel
Recommendedcitation:
LéryMoffat,L.andN.Poitiers(2024)‘Globalsupplychains:lessonsfromadecadeofdisruption’,WorkingPaper04/2024,Bruegel
1
Contents
1Introduction 2
2COVID-19 2
2.1Timelineofeconomiceffects 3
2.2Pricevolatilityandshortages 6
2.3Policyresponsesandtheaftermath 7
3TheRussianinvasionofUkraine 8
3.1Energyshock 8
3.2Agriculture 12
3.3Inperspective:theshockandtheresponse 17
4TheChina-UStradewar 18
4.1TheTrump-Bidentradewars 18
4.2Thechipwars 19
4.3Theimpact 20
5Policylessonsfromadecadeoftradeshocks 22
References 23
2
1Introduction
Afterdecadesofrapidexpansionofglobalsupplychains,thelastdecadehasseenaseriesofmajorshocksthatdisruptedtheirfunctioning.TheChina-UStradewar,COVID-19andtheRussianinvasionofUkrainehavealldisruptedflowsofgoodsacrossborders,leadingbusinessleadersandpolicymakerstoquestionthewisdomofrelyingontheglobalnetworkofsupplychains.Asaresult,variouspolicieshavebeenenactedwiththeexplicitgoalofreshapingvaluechains,diversifyingoroutrightreshoringsupplychains.However,fundamentalquestionsaboutthenatureoftheseshocksremain.
Thispaperrevisitstheeffectsofthreeshocksonthefunctioningofglobalsupplychains.WefirstlookatthedisruptionoftheCOVID-19pandemic,theninvestigatetheimpactoftheRussianinvasionof
Ukraine,beforediscussingtheUS-Chinatradedisputeandtheensuing‘technologicalcoldwar’.The
aimistoidentifylessonsabouthowpoliciescanadapttopreventdisruptionandtomitigatetheeffectoffutureshocks.Weareinterestedbothinthemagnitudeofshocksaswellastheirlastingeffects.InthecasesofthepandemicandtheRussianinvasionofUkraine,themagnitudeoftheshockwasveryhigh,butdissipatedrelativelyquickly.Ontheotherhand,theUS-Chinatradewarhasbeenaprotractedshiftinglobaltrade,withenormousramificationsforsupplychainsandcitizens.Whilethelengthofashockdetermineswhethertheeconomicdamageisenduring,evenashortshockcancreate
significantpolitical-economyproblems.Thismeans,thateveniflong-termgrowthtrendsarenotdisruptedforextendedperiods,theupheavalcausedbysuddenlargeshockmightstillwarrantthecostsofmitigationmeasures.
Meanwhile,themechanismsthroughwhichmarketsreactedwerequitedifferentacrosssectors.Boththepandemicandthewarincreasedscarcityinmanymarkets.Whilethiswasoftendescribedas
‘shortages’,itwasnotalwaysashortageinthenarroweconomicdefinition.Economistsonlydescribesomethingasashortageifthepricemechanismbreaksdownandagoodbecomesunavailable,evenforthosewillingtopayahighprice.Highpricesreflectingscarcityleadtoeconomicallyefficient
allocationofresourcesandsetincentivesfornewproducerstoentermarkets.Butthismechanismcanalsohavepoliticallyandeconomicallyundesirableeffects.Forinstance,agovernmentmightwanttoprotectconsumersfrompricespikesinheatingcoststhatcouldpriceoutvulnerableconsumers.
Meanwhile,businessesthatfacehighpricevolatilitycouldstruggletofulfilcontractswithfixedpricesandriskreputationaldamageiftheytransmitpricespikestoconsumers.
ThispaperispartoftheReThinkGSCproject,whichstudieshowsupplychainsareadaptingtoaneweraofmorecontentiousglobalpolitics,climatechangeandthegrowingimportanceofservicesfortrade.
2COVID-19
TheCOVID-19pandemicwasamajorshocktotheworldeconomy.Inresponsetotheoutbreakofthepandemic,countriesclosedtheirborders,andgovernmentsforcedfactoriesandpersonal-servicesproviderstoceaseoperation,andimposedlockdownsontheirpopulations.Amidlargeuncertainty,
3
companiesadaptedtheirsupplystrategiesandconsumersshiftedconsumptionpatterns.Meanwhile,governmentsinadvancedeconomiesenactedmajoreconomicstimulusprogrammestosupporttheireconomiesandmitigatetheeconomicimpactofthepandemic.Thiscocktailofeconomicshiftshadmajorglobalimplicationsandcreatedunexpectedcircumstancesforcompaniesengagedinglobal
valuechains.
Oncethepandemiceased,therewasamajordiscussiononwhethersupplychainshavebecometoofragile.Wearguethatsupplychainsprovedremarkablyresilientinthefaceofashockofsuch
magnitude.WhiletheoverlappingofthepandemicandtheRussianinvasionofUkrainemakeafinalassessmentdifficult,thesupply-chainrelatedeffectsofthepandemicseemtohavedissipatedwithinonlyafewyears.Whilethemagnitudeoftheshockwaslarge,itwasrelativelyshort-lived.
2.1Timelineofeconomiceffects
InJanuaryandFebruary2020,countriesclosedtheirborderstoforeigntravellersinresponsetotheoutbreakofthepandemicinChinaandtheglobalspreadthatfollowed.Asdomesticcasesgrew
exponentiallyregardless,countriesimposeddomesticlockdowns.BytheendofMarch2020over100countrieshadresortedtolockdownmeasures
1
,significantlyimpactingtheabilityofthelocal
economytofunction.Evenwheremovementwasnotentirelycurtailed,householdsrestrictedtheirmovementsandbusinessesresortedtoworkingfromhome
2
.
Theensuingsupply-chaindisruptionsandnegativedemandshockmanifesteddifferentlyacross
sectors.IntheEU,sectorsrequiringphysicalproximity,suchasthecreativeandhospitalityindustries,
wereimpactedseverely,whereasthepharmaceuticalanddigitalsectorssawrelativelysmallcontractions(DeVetetal,2021).Butoverall,thefirstwavesawsignificantincreasesin
unemploymentandreductionsinoutputfromimportantindustries
3
.
Governmentsinadvancedeconomiesenactedhugestimulusprogrammestosupporthouseholdsandindustry.Thesecameindifferentvarieties.IntheEU,manygovernmentsfocusedonsustaining
existingworkrelationshipsbyimplementingjob-retentionschemes(ArnoldandKammer,2021).EUcountriesalsodisbursedstateaidtocompaniesofvariouskindstohelpthemsurvivetheeconomicdownturn.TheUS,ontopofothermeasures,disbursed$293billionincashhandoutstotaxpayersaspartofthe$2.3trillionCARESAct
4
.IntheEU,additionalspendingbymemberstatesin2020was
estimatedat3.3percentofGDP
5
.
1SeeBBC,‘Coronavirus:Theworldinlockdowninmapsandcharts’,BBCNews,6April2020,availableat
/news/world-52103747.
2ThiswasdocumentedforalargenumberofcountriesbytheGoogleMobilityReports,whichusedsmartphonedatatomeasurewherepeoplespendtheirtimeduringthepandemic.Availableat
/covid19/mobility/.
3ForasummaryontheEUduringtheearlypandemic,seeMarcusetal(2021).
4IMFCOVID-19policytracker,availableat
/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.
5SeeEuropeanCommissionmemoof3March2021,‘Questionsandanswers:Communicationonfiscalpolicyresponsetocoronaviruspandemic’,
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_885.
4
2018-Q1
2018-Q2
2018-Q3
2018-Q4
2019-Q1
2019-Q2
2019-Q3
2019-Q4
2020-Q1
2020-Q2
2020-Q3
2020-Q4
2021-Q1
2021-Q2
2021-Q3
2021-Q4
2022-Q1
2022-Q2
2022-Q3
2022-Q4
2023-Q1
2023-Q2
2023-Q3
25
20
15
10
5
0
Ineconomicterms,thepandemicmeantasimultaneoussupplyandademandshock.Demand
decreasedbecauseofuncertaintyamongstconsumersandbusinesses,whichledtodecreased
investmentandconsumptionexpenditureoverall.However,thepicturewasmixed.Thesimpleinabilitytoacquirecertainin-personservicesdestroyedcertaintypesofconsumption,whereastheshiftto
remoteworkboosteddemandforICTgoodsthatenabledthedigitalisationofworkprocesses.Paralleltothenegativedemandshock,thecombinationofhighlevelsofuncertaintyregardingfutureincome,thesuppressionofconsumerspendingopportunitiesandincomeoremploymentsupportprovidedbygovernmentsledtoanaccumulationoflargesavings
(Figure1)
(Attinasietal,2021).Intheeuroarea,highersavingsweremostlydrivenbylowerconsumption(Dosscheetal,2021).
Figure1:Pandemic-periodhouseholdsavingsrate(%)
30
—EuropeanUnion-27countries(from2020)
—Euroarea–20countries(from2023)
Source:BruegelbasedonEurostatdatasetnasq_10_ki.
Thesupplyshockresultedfromdifficultyinproducinggoodsariginsfromfactoryclosuresand
logisticalhurdlesinshippinggoodsacrossborders.Certaingoodsbecamedifficulttoprocure,as
demandforthemsurgedorbecausecrucialstepsofthesupplychainbecamedisrupted.Theinabilitytoacquirepersonalservicesledtoashiftofconsumptioninfavourofgoods
.Figure2a
showsthelargedropinconsumptionofboth(non-food)goodsandservicesresultingfromdomesticandforeign
disruption.Italsoshowsthequickrecoverymadebygoodsrelativetoservices.
5
2019-01
2019-05
2019-09
2020-01
2020-05
2020-09
2021-01
2021-05
2021-09
2022-01
2022-05
2022-09
2023-01
2023-05
2023-09
2015-01
2015-08
2016-03
2016-10
2017-05
2017-12
2018-07
2019-02
2019-09
2020-04
2020-11
2021-06
2022-01
2022-08
2023-03
2023-10
Figure2:Pandemicretailturnoverofnon-foodproducts(exceptfuel)andservicesintheEU27
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
(a)Retailsaleofnon-foodproducts(exceptfuel)
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
(b)Serviceactivities
Accommodation
Foodandbeverageserviceactivities
Source:BruegelbasedonEurostatdatasetsSTS_TRTU_MandSTS_SETU_M.Note:Index(2015=100),Monthlydata,calendarandseasonallyadjusted.
Theincreaseindemandforgoodstogetherwithlogisticaldifficultiesledtoasurgeinratesforfreight(UNCTAD,2021).Forexample,inLosAngeles,thesurgeindemandfortradedgoodstogetherwithhighnumbersofsickworkersduringthepandemicledtolongwaitingperiodsforshipsintheport
6
.Similarproblemswereexperiencedaroundtheworldandweredirectlyreflectedinthecostsofshipping.
Figure3
showsthefreightratesfortheshippingofastandard40-footcontainerfromShanghaito
RotterdamandtoLosAngeles.TheshippingratesfromChinatoEuropeincreasedfromaround$2000tomorethan$14000,aseven-foldincreaseinthecost.
6AndrewO’Reilly,‘Stalledships,stressedcrews:CovidbuyingboomoverwhelmsLAports’,TheGuardian,11March2021,
/us-news/2021/mar/11/la-ports-stalled-ships-stressed-crews-covid-buying-boom.
6
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
Figure3:Freightrates($)
—WCIShanghaitoRotterdamper40footbox(USD)
—WCIShanghaitoLosAngeles
per40footbox(USD)
Source:Bloomberg.
2.2Pricevolatilityandshortages
Theincreaseinscarcityandhighercostsofgoodsproductionanddistributionweremanifestedinbothconsumerpricesandtheavailabilityofgoodstoconsumers.Aremarkableexampleofhowthese
phenomenamaterialisedwasinthemarketsfornewandusedcars.Anticipatinglowerdemandandthedifficultyofprocuringparts,manymanufacturersdisinvestedtheirinventoriesandcancelledordersforinputssuchassemiconductors(Burkackyetal,2022).Butincontrasttoexpectations,consumerdemandforcarssurgedandcarcompaniescouldnotkeepupwithdemand,resultinginanapparent
‘shortage’ofchipsforcarmakers.Inthecaseofnewcars,thisledtolongwaitingperiodstoreceivenewcars,whilepricesremainedrelativelysimilar.Companiesdecidednottousemarketpricinginordertomanagetheirinventories,andinsteadoptedtoincreasewaitingperiodsforconsumers.Meanwhile,thesecond-handcarmarketdidnothaveanysuchrestrictions.Inthismarket,pricessurgeduntilmarkets
cleared.Figure4
showspriceindicesfornewandusedcars.Whiletherewasagradualincreaseinthepricesofnewcarsby19percent,pricesforusedcarssurgedrapidlyby57percent.
7
Figure4:UsedversusnewcarsCPI,UnitedStates
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
01/01/2016
01/05/2016
01/09/2016
01/01/2017
01/05/2017
01/09/2017
01/01/2018
01/05/2018
01/09/2018
01/01/2019
01/05/2019
01/09/2019
____Used
01/01/2020
01/05/2020
01/09/2020
01/01/2021
01/05/2021
01/09/2021
01/01/2022
01/05/2022
01/09/2022
01/01/2023
01/05/2023
01/09/2023
____New
Source:BruegelbasedonFRED.
Thispointstoaninterestingdynamic,withsomemarketsabletoreacttosupplyordemandshocks
throughpricing,whileothersarelessflexible.Inmanycases,commoditypricessimplyincreased,
leadingtopricevolatilitybutnotshortages.However,whentherearepre-negotiatedpricesincontractsorreputationalrisksassociatedwithmassivepriceincreases(asisthecaseforcarmanufacturers),anincreaseinscarcitycanleadtoactualshortagesandlongerwaittimesforthefulfilmentofcontracts.
2.3Policyresponsesandtheaftermath
Pandemic-inducedpoliciesplayedamajorroleincreatingthemarketdistortionsexperiencedduringthepandemic.Closedbordercrossings,factoryclosuresandfiscalstimulusplayedimportantrolesintheeconomicimpactofthepandemic,andtheimpactonsupplychainsspecifically.Therewasalsoanincreaseinexportrestrictions,inparticularformedicalgoods(Evenett,2022).Atthesametime,therewereeffectivepolicyinterventionstomitigatetheeffectsofthepandemiconconsumersand
producers.Afterthebriefimplementationofaninternalexportrestriction,EuropeanUnion
policymakersshiftedquicklytocommonpolicieswhenitcametopandemic-relatedtrademeasures(Marcusetal,2021).IntheEU,‘greenlanes’wereestablishedthatenabledgoodstoflowacross
otherwiseclosedborders.
Whiletheshockwashuge,thepandemicisyettoleavealastingmarkintheglobaltradeindicators.
Tradeingoodsrevertedquicklytoitspre-pandemictrend,despitetheinitiallargedropinretailtradeandthepricespikesintheinternationalanddomesticcostsofshipping.Mostpandemic-inducedpricespikeshavecomedownandnormalised.Inflationhasnotreturnedtoitspre-pandemictrendineithertheEUortheUS,butthisispartlydrivenbytheeffectsofthewarinUkraine.
8
However,thepandemichasledtoarethinkingamongpolicymakers.IntheEU,thesinglemarket
emergencyinstrument(beingadoptedattimeofwritingastheInternalMarketEmergencyand
ResilienceAct,IMERA
7
)isintendedtoprovideasustainedlegalbasisforthetypeofmeasuresused
duringthepandemic.Itisintendedtomitigatetheimpactifanothershockofasimilarkindwereto
appear.Industrial-policyinitiativesliketheEuropeanChipsAct(Regulation(EU)2023/1781)are
directlymotivatedbytheshortagesexperiencedduringthepandemic,andtheperceivedrisksoflongvaluechainshaveincreased.Thepandemicexperiencehasalsocontributedtothenewwaveof
industrial-policyinitiatives,asgovernmentshavebecomemoreworriedaboutsupplychainsandtrytoreshoreproduction.LawsincludingtheInflationReductionActintheUSandtheEuropeanreactiontoit(undertheTemporaryCrisisandTransitionFramework,seeTagliapietraetal,2023)attempttolocalisemanufacturingofgoodsconsideredcritical,whichispartiallyjustifiedbytheneedforeconomic
resilience.Suchpolicyshiftsasaresultofthepandemicwilllikelyleadtoalastingchangeinglobalsupplychains,especiallygiventhefurtherimpetustosuchpoliciesstemmingfromRussia’sinvasionofUkraine.
3TheRussianinvasionofUkraine
Russia’sfull-scaleinvasionofUkrainestartingon24February2022cameduringaperiodofelevatedcommoditypricesandcausedrecordpricespikesincommoditymarketsforenergyandagriculturalgoods.However,theeconomicfallouthaduneveneffectsacrosscountries.Thosewithlarge
dependenciesonRussianorUkrainiancommoditiesandwithfewreadilyavailablesubstitutes
experiencedlargershocksthanthosewithmorediversifiedsupplychains.Thiswasparticularly
notableforinfrastructurallyconcentratedsupplychains,suchaspipelinegastotheEU.Theinvasionexposedthesemajorsupplychainrisksandhasbeeninstrumentalincausingashiftoftoneinthepolicydebatearoundtheriskstoglobalsupplychains,compoundingsimilarbutnascentrhetoric
duringthepandemic.Thisincludestrepidationaboutotherpotentialchokepointsinglobalsupplychains,tradediversificationandinfrastructuralinvestment,andageneralflurryofdiscourseandpolicyrelatedtotheideaofstrategicautonomy.
Inthissection,weexplorehowtheshockplayedoutinregionsthatwereexposedduetohigh-risk
supplychains.Wearguethattheinvasionwasalocalshock,sinceshockswerenotsointenseinareaswithmorediversifiedsupplychains.Wealsoanalysetheensuingpolicyresponse.
3.1Energyshock
Priortotheinvasion,EuropewasdependentonRussiaforasignificantproportionofitsenergyneeds.In2021,importsofRussiangasaccountedforalmost40percentoftheEU’stotalgasconsumption
8
.
7SeeCounciloftheEUpressreleaseof1February2024,‘SMEI/IMERA:CouncilandParliamentstrikeaprovisionaldealoncrisispreparedness’,
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/02/01/single-market-emergency-
instrument-council-and-parliament-strike-a-provisional-deal-on-crisis-preparedness/.
8SeeIEApressreleaseof3March2022,‘HowEuropecancutnaturalgasimportsfromRussiasignificantlywithinayear-
News’,InternationalEnergyAgency
,/news/how-europe-can-cut-natural-gas-imports-from-russia-
significantly-within-a-year.
9
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
AlmostalloftheEU’sgaswasdeliveredthroughonlyfourpipelinesfromRussia:NordStream,UkraineTransit,YamalandTurkstream(Zachmannetal,2024).ThisrepresentedasignificantstakeintheEU’senergyinfrastructure,whichprovedtobeanmajorsystemicrisk.
Priortotheinvasion,theEUwasalreadyexperiencinganenergycrisisinthesecondhalfof2021
becauseofincreasedgasdemandfollowingthere-openingofeconomiespost-COVID-19
9
.TheRussianaggressionseverelycompoundedthecrisis,causingrecordenergyprices.Naturalgaspricesreachedhistorichighs
(Figure5)
inthesummerof2022becauseofthereductioninsupplyfromRussia,fearsofshortages,generaluncertaintyandlowoutputfromhydroandnuclearelectricityoutputinthe
summer(McWilliamsetal,2022;GilTertreetal,2023).ThisledtoincreasedwholesaleelectricitypricesintheEU,passedthroughtohouseholdsandindustry,sincethemostexpensivetechnologydeterminestheelectricityprice(McWilliamsetal,2022;GilTertreetal,2023).
Figure5:LastpriceTTFfutures(€/MWh)
Source:Bloomberg.
Incontrast,theUSsawlesspricevolatility(Figure6).LargeUSdomesticgasproductionandfewtiestoRussiaandUkrainegenerallymeantthattheUSwasinitiallyshieldedfromtheshock.TheHenryHubprice,theUSnaturalgasbenchmarkprice,eventuallyincreasedduetotheglobalgasmarkets,butnottothesamedegreeasinEurope.IntheabsenceofasystemicrisktotheUS’senergyinfrastructure,
thekindsofpoliciesthattheEUhaspursuedsincetheinvasionhavenotbeennecessaryintheUS.
9SeeCounciloftheEU,‘Energypricesandsecurityofsupply’,
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/energy-prices-
and-security-of-supply/.
10
Figure6:EuropeanvsUSnaturalgasprices(€/MWh)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
20/07/201820/07/2019
20/07/202020/07/202120/07/2022
TTFHenryHub
20/07/2023
Source:Bloomberg.
Thereweresubstantialpolicyreactionstothisshock,inparticularintheEU.Thisincludedfiscal
supporttoaidconsumersandindustryfacingelevatedprices,aswellastradediversificationand
investmentinenergyinfrastructuretodiversifyfromRussianenergy.Manyofthesepolicieswereofenormousmagnitude,showcasingtheproportionateresponseneededtoashockinahighriskand
essentialsupplychain.IntheEU,theimmediateresponsewastoshieldhouseholdsandindustryfromthehighenergycosts.TotalenergysubsidiesintheEUincreasedfrom€216billionin2021to€390
billionin2022throughatleast230measurestoeasetheburdenofhighandvolatilepricesacross
economicsectors.Householdsandindustryreceivedthemajority
(Figure7)
(EuropeanCommission,2023).Subsidiesweredesignedtolowerthecostofenergytofacilitatedemandviataxmeasures,
incomeorpricesupportanddirecttransfers(EuropeanCommission,2023).Subsidieswerealsousedtocombattheenergycrisisthroughsupportingenergyefficiencyandsupportinginfrastructure,whichreceived250percentmoreinsubsidiesin2022thanin2021(EuropeanCommission,2023).
11
Figure7:EnergysubsidiesbyeconomicsectorintheEU27,€billions(2022prices),2015–2022
450
390
400
350
300
250
216
193195200
200
177174179
150
100
50
0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2015
Crosssector
Others
Agriculture
Households
Industry
Transport
EnergyIndustry
Source:EuropeanCommission(2023).
TheEUhasalsopursuedmedium-andlonger-termstrategiestoreducetherisktoenergysupplies.
Sgaravattietal(2022)groupedtheEU’smulti-prongedapproachtotheenergycrisisintoenergydeals,infrastructure,energysubstitution,demandreductionandthedevelopmentofrenewables.TheEU
succeededinreplacingRussiangassupplythroughnewdeals,whichbytheendof2022,hadresultedinagreementsamountingto10.8billioncubicmetres(bcm)ofnewgassupplyin2023and47bcm
lateron,notincludingthe50bcmLNGimportvolumeplansfromtheUS.
NewinfrastructureinvestmentincludedexpandedLNGcapacity,theBalticpipelinebetweenNorwayandPoland,gasinterconnectorsandfloatingstorageandregasificationunits.Also,interestin
alternativesupplychainsbypassingRussianterritoryhasincreased.TheEuropeanBankfor
ReconstructionandDevelopmentannounceda$100millioninvestmentintheKazakhrailwaysystemtosupportthemiddlecorridor,analternativerouteavoidingthetrans-Siberianrailwaytotransport
goodsfromChina(Eldem,2022).
Thecombinationofpoliciesdescribedabovehasbeenbroadlysuccessful.Whilstitistoosoontofullyevaluatethesuccessofenergysubsidiesincombatinghistoricallyelevatedenergyprices,therearesignsoftheircontributiontotheEU’sresilienceduringthecrisis.EvidencesuggeststhatsubsidiestohouseholdswerewelltargetedintheEU,shieldingthemost-vulnerableconsumersfromthepass
throughofelevatedenergycosts(seeArreguietal,2022).Furthermore,industryoverallincreasedoutputandemploymentin2022
(Figure8)
.Ontheotherhand,industriesforwhichenergyinput
representsalargerproportionofproductioncosts,suchasthechemicalsindustry,experienceda
contractioninoutputinthethirdquarterof2022relativetothethirdquarterof2021(Sgaravattietal,
12
40%
2023).Finally,thedevelopmentofnewinfrastructuretoaccommodatenewsourcesofenergycontributedtolowergasprices,andhassecuredalow-riskanddiversifiedenergysupplyforthefuture.
Figure8:ChangeinEUindustrialoutput:Q32022vsQ32021
.
2.0%
0.0%
-2.0%
-4.0%
-6.0%
-8.0%
IndustrytotalManufacturingPaperChemicalsNon-metallicBasicmetals
minerals
OutputEmploymentHoursworked
Source:Sgaravattietal(2023).
TheEUexperiencedahugeshockrequiringanequallyhugefiscal,infrastructureandtraderesponse.
Thesepolicieswerelargelysuccessful,demonstratingtheEU’smulti-facetedresiliencetotheshock.Itshouldbeemphasisedthatthisresiliencecamewithalargepricetagthatitwouldbeundesirabletorepeat.
3.2Agriculture
AtthepointRussiainvadedUkraine,thetwocountries,alongwithKazakhstan,wereresponsiblefor25percentofglobalcerealexports,andRussiaandUkrainealonewereresponsiblefor12percentofallcaloriestraded(Zachmannetal,2022;Glauberetal,2022).RussiaandUkraineaccountedfor20
percentand10percentofglobalwheatexports,respectively,andarecrucialsuppliersofbarley,sunfloweroil,maizeandrapeseedtoglobalmarkets(OECDandFAO,2022).
Ukraineexported96percentofitsagriculturalproductsviatherobustnetworkofBlackSeaports
(USDA,2023).Russia’sinvasioninitiallyblockedallofUkraine’sportsforaperiodofalmostsixmonthsfromFebruarytoJuly2022.MajorportsincludingMykolayiv,MariupolandKhersonwereeither
affectedbythefightingordestroyed(Zachmannetal,2022).
Likeenergyexports,agriculturalcommoditieswerealreadyatrelativelyhighpricesin2021andearly2022,asaresultofpass-throughofhighinputprices.Followingtheinvasion,globalfearsabout
Ukraine’sabilitytoharvestandexportagriculturalcommoditiescompoundedthesealreadyelevated
13
Eurospertonne
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
prices,leadingtorecordprices(De
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 北京 THEBOX朝外年轻力中心
- 中国传统文化(西安交通大学)知到智慧树章节测试课后答案2024年秋西安交通大学
- 安全培训教学课件
- 两地教育局合作协议书
- 河南省洛阳市重点中学2025届高三下学期第六次检测数学试卷含解析
- 放弃工伤协议书范本
- 《督查工作》课件
- 课件教学高中
- 《疫功能异常》课件
- 《酒店促销策略》课件
- 学校传染病控制课件
- 福建省泉州市2023-2024学年高一上学期期末质检英语试题(解析版)
- 2024秋期国家开放大学专科《建设法规》一平台在线形考(形成性作业一至五)试题及答案
- 中华人民共和国民法典(总则)培训课件
- 第三单元第1课 标志设计 课件 2024-2025学年人教版(2024)初中美术七年级上册
- 苏教版(2024新版)七年级上册生物期末模拟试卷 3套(含答案)
- 肿瘤物理消融治疗新进展
- 专题10 特殊的平行四边形中的最值模型之胡不归模型(原卷版)
- 赛力斯招聘在线测评题
- 2024秋五年级英语上册期末专项突破阅读三回答问题人教PEP
- 4 古代诗歌四首《 观沧海》教学设计
评论
0/150
提交评论