版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
GRE写作:常见问题介绍GRE写作常见问题有哪些呢?今日我给大家带来GRE写作:常见问题介绍,盼望能够关心到大家,下面我就和大家共享,来观赏一下吧。
GRE写作:常见问题介绍
第一,不肯定能揪出正确的关键字。
比如,221Thechiefbenefitofthestudyofhistoryistobreakdowntheillusionthatpeopleinoneperiodoftimearesignificantlydifferentfrompeoplewholivedatanyothertimeinhistory.正确的关键字打算了写作是否会跑题。
其次,即使揪出合适的关键字,在第一反应期内也不肯定有话可说。
比如,130Howchildrenaresocializedtodaydeterminesthedestinyofsociety.Unfortunately,wehavenotyetlearnedhowtoraisechildrenwhocanhelpbringaboutabettersociety.对于理工科的GF来说,平常的教学中忽视此类文科性学问是比较常见的。现在突然拿到”socialization”“bettersociety“以及”education”,常常会消失大脑断电或短路,接下来的写作又从何说起?!
简而言之,担忧自己对一问题会有看法,但不知道怎么去论证这一看法,更不要说让我们的论证persuasive,insightful.
第三,成人思想,婴儿表达。
即使有话可说,也不肯定是ETS想要看到的话,有可能是会消失“成人思想,婴儿表达”。自己看了都觉得恶心,更不要说让professors来观赏了。在ARGUMENT的写作中,主要担忧没有把握A的规律链,develop深度不够,消失“强词夺理”的局面,而不是“晓之以理,动之以情”。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.
According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year. And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the publics lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies.
Although the reasoning in this arguement is logical, the writer failed to consider other reasons for the disparity between the percentage of people attending the companys movie and the percentage of favorable reviews. Perhaps the fault lies with the reviewers and not the production company; the public may not trust the critics reviews. Another posibility for the attendance drop is that the general public does not find the subject matter of the movies enticing. If that were the case, spending less on producing new movies in an effort to re-direct funds to advertising could backfire by further limiting the types of movies available to the potential audience. Maybe the general public is simply not impressed with the critically-acclaimed qualities of the movies (such as eloquent screenplays, artful cinematography, and realistic acting) and and would prefer seeing flashy special effects and big-name stars. The possible reasons for the attendance decline are numerous; even aspects not directly related to the movie industry (such as the improving quality of television programming and the increasing popularity of home computer use) may play large roles. The companys management would be wise to consider and study the entire realm of possibilities before making drastic changes in its budget based on one statistical discovery.
Commentary
This response identifies and analyzes some important flaws in the argument. Although the number of points mentioned is the same as that in the sample 5 paper, this response remains at the 4 score level because the points of the critique are only minimally developed or supported.
The essay identifies four points:
-- the public might not trust critics
-- the movies subject matter might not be appealing
-- the public might prefer seeing special effects or big-name stars rather than good cinematography or realistic acting
-- perhaps improvement in TV programming or increased use of home computers has kept people away from movie theaters
Ideas in the response are conveyed well and clearly; the use of language is generally strong. But the papers bare-bones analysis gives it a list-like quality. It is therefore merely adequate and merits a score of 4.
GRE写作满分范文赏析
The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Silver Screen Movie Production Company.
According to a recent report from our marketing department, fewer people attended movies produced by Silver Screen during the past year than in any other year. And yet the percentage of generally favorable comments by movie reviewers about specific Silver Screen movies actually increased during this period. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers; so the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the publics lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Silver Screen should therefore spend more of its budget next year on reaching the public through advertising and less on producing new movies.
The advertising director of Silver Screen should lose his job. It is clear that his analysis of the decrease in attendance in the past year was incomplete. A better qualified individual might have explored the issue further by doing several different things. First of all, surveys of the general population could provide a clue to the decreased viewership. They may find that people arent as willing to pay the high prices anymore. A survey may also reveal that people are aware of Silver Screen, but opt not to see the films. An inspection of the nature of the films made by Silver Screen could also hint to the root of the problem. If Silver Screen produces a lot of the same type of movie, then the problem may be that they dont produce enough to appeal to the diverse interests of the population. For instance, if their movies typically contain excessive violence and foul language, parents wont take their children to these films. That is a significant portion of the potential viewing population lost.
The ad director mentions that reviewers liked specific films and gave more favorable reviews than in the past. But he neglects to mention the specific numbers- critics may have raved about 2 movies and turned their thumbs down the 10 others. If thats the case, its no wonder that viewership has declined.
Spending more on advertising, and less on production, as the ad director suggests, could drive the company out of business. If the media builds alot of hype over a new release that was poorly produced, people are more likely to be disappointed, and skeptical about future productions. This is certainly not in the companys best interests. What is in the companys best interest is a broader scope of the problem, and different approaches to solving i
Commentary
This strong response begins with an attack on the advertising director of Silver Screen but quickly shifts to identifying major flaws in the argument. The main points of the critique are that
-- the real reasons for a decline in viewership have not yet been identified;
-- S
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
评论
0/150
提交评论