宫东风教授2016年考研英语课后学习计划_第1页
宫东风教授2016年考研英语课后学习计划_第2页
宫东风教授2016年考研英语课后学习计划_第3页
宫东风教授2016年考研英语课后学习计划_第4页
宫东风教授2016年考研英语课后学习计划_第5页
全文预览已结束

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

中国西安

第六周:(Week6:2015.10.3—10.9)

配套音频讲解 :ht /s/1gdEVEGr

配套音频写作精讲 :ht /s/1o6xdPFG

Ifyoudoubtyourself,you’vealreadylosttherace.——UsainBolt

10.3(周六)

阅读学习计划

收听《读记单词》一书第129页的逐句精讲。

做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第203页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲

写作学习计划

精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第29篇和应用文写作第29篇的。

抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第29篇和应用文写作第29篇。

10.4(周日)

阅读学习计划

收听《读记单词》一书第123页的逐句精讲。

做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第202页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲

写作学习计划

精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第30篇和应用文写作第30篇的。

抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第30篇和应用文写作第30篇。

10.5(周一)

阅读学习计划

收听《读记单词》一书第118页的逐句精讲。

做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第200页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲

写作学习计划

精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第31篇和应用文写作第31篇的。

抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第31篇和应用文写作第31篇。

10.6(周二)

阅读学习计划

收听《读记单词》一书第112页的逐句精讲。

做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第199页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲

写作学习计划

精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第32篇和应用文写作第32篇的。

抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第32篇和应用文写作第32篇。

10.7(周三)

阅读学习计划

收听本周英语二阅读2-12-1的逐句精讲。(请见本周所附的原文)

做英语二阅读2-12-1的,然后收听此文的相关精讲。

写作学习计划

精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第40篇和应用文写作第40篇的。

抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第40篇和应用文写作第40篇。

10.8(周四)

阅读学习计划

收听本周英语二阅读2-12-2的逐句精讲。(请见本周所附的原文)

做英语二阅读2-12-2的,然后收听此文的相关精讲。

写作学习计划

精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第41篇和应用文写作第41篇的。

抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第41篇和应用文写作第41篇。

10.9(周五)

阅读学习计划

收听本周英语二阅读2-12-3的逐句精讲。(请见本周所附的原文)

做英语二阅读2-12-3的,然后收听此文的相关精讲。

写作学习计划

精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第42篇和应用文写作第42篇的。

抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第42篇和应用文写作第42篇。

附:英语二2012阅读

Text1

hasneverbeenterriblypopularwithstudentsandevenmanyparents,butinrecentyearsithasbeenparticularlyscorned.Schooldistrictsacrossthecountry,mostrecentlyLosAngelesUnified,arerevisingtheirthinkingonthiseducationalritual.Unfortunay,L.A.Unifiedhasproducedaninflexiblewhichmandatesthatwiththeexceptionofsomeadvancedcourses,maynolongercountformorethan10%ofastudent’sacademicgrade.

Thisruleismeanttoaddressthedifficultythatstudentsfromimpoverishedorchaotichomesmighthaveincompletingtheir.Buttheisunclearandcontradictory.Certainly,noshouldbeassignedthatstudentscannotcompleteontheirownorthattheycannotdowithoutexpensiveequipment.Butifthedistrictisessentiallygivingapasstostudentswhodonotdotheirbecauseofcomplicatedfamilylives,itisgoingriskilyclosetotheimplicationthatstandardsneedtobeloweredforpoorchildren.

Districtadministratorssaythatwillstillbeapartofschooling;teachersareallowedtoassignasmuchofitastheywant.Butwithcountingfornomorethan10%oftheirgrades,studentscaneasilyskiphalftheirandseeverylittledifferenceontheirreportcards.Somestudentsmightdowellonstatetestswithoutcompletingtheir,butwhataboutthestudentswhoperformedwellonthetestsanddidtheir?Itisquitepossiblethatthehelped.Yetratherthanempoweringteacherstofindwhatworksbestfortheirstudents,theimposesaflat,across-the-boardrule.

Atthesametime,theaddressesnoneofthetrulythornyquestionsabout.Ifthedistrictfindstobeunimportanttoitsstudents’academicachievement,itshouldmovetoreduceoreliminatetheassignments,notmakethemcountforalmostnothing.Conversely,ifmatters,itshouldaccountforasignificantportionofthegrade.Meanwhile,thisdoesnothingtoensurethatthestudentsreceiveismeaningfulorappropriatetotheirageandthesubject,orthatteachersarenotassigningmorethantheyarewillingtoreviewandcorrect.

Therulesshouldbeputonholdwhiletheschoolboard,whichisresponsibleforsettingeducational,looksintothematterandconductspublichearings.ItisnottoolateforL.A.Unifiedtodoright.

ItisimpliedinParagraph1thatnowadays .

isreceivingmorecriticism

isgainingmorepreferences

isnolongeraneducationalritual

isnotrequiredforadvancedcourses

L.A.Unifiedhasmadetheruleaboutmainlybecausepoorstudents .

tendtohavemoderateexpectationsfortheireducation

haveaskedforadifferenteducationalstandard

mayhaveproblemsfinishingtheir

havevoicedtheircomintsabout

AccordingtoParagraph3,oneproblemwiththeisthatitmay .

resultinstudents’indifferencetotheirreportcards

underminetheauthorityofstatetests

restrictteachers’powerineducation

discouragestudentsfromng

AsmentionedinParagraph4,akeyquestionunansweredaboutiswhether .

itshouldbeeliminated

itcountsmuchinschooling

itcesextraburdensonteachers

itisimportantforgrades

Asuitabletitleforthistextcouldbe .

AFaultyApproachto

A edforPoorStudents

ThornyQuestionsabout

WrongInterpretationsofanEducational

Text2

Prettyinpink:adultwomendonotrememberbeingsoobsessedwiththecolour,yetitispervasiveinouryounggirls’lives.Itisnotthatpinkisintrinsicallybad,butitissuchatinysliceoftherainbowand,thoughitmaycelebrategirlhoodinoneway,italsorepeatedlyandfirmlyfusesgirls’identitytoappearance.Thenitpresentsthatconnection,evenamongtwo-year-olds,betweengirlsasnotonlyinnocentbutasevidenceofinnocence.Lookingaround,Idespairedatthesingularlackofimaginationaboutgirls’livesandinterests.

Girls’attractiontopinkmayseemunavoidable,somehowencodedintheirDNA,butaccordingtoJoPaoletti,anassociateprofessorofAmericanStudies,itisnot.Childrenwerenotcolour-codedatalluntiltheearly20thcentury:intheerabeforedomesticwashingmachinesallbabiesworewhiteasapracticalmatter,sincetheonlywayofgettingclothescleanwastoboilthem.What’smore,bothboysandgirlsworewhatwerethoughtofasgender-neutraldresses.Whennurserycolourswereintroduced,pinkwasactuallyconsideredthemoremasculinecolour,apasversionofred,whichwasassociatedwithstrength.Blue,withitsintimationsoftheVirginMary,constancyandfaithfulness,symbolisedfemininity.Itwasnotuntilthemid-1980s,whenamplifyingageanddifferencesbecameadominantchildren’smarketingstrategy,thatpinkfullycameintoitsown,whenitbegantoseeminherentlyattractivetogirls,partofwhatdefinedthemasfemale,atleastforthefirstfewcriticalyears.

Ihadnotrealisedhowprofoundlymarketingtrendsdictatedourperceptionofwhatisnaturaltokids,includingourcorebeliefsabouttheirpsychologicaldevelopment.Takethetoddler.Iassumedthatphasewassomethingexpertsdevelopedafteryearsofresearchintochildren’sbehaviour:wrong.Turnsout,accordingtoDanielCook,ahistorianofchildhoodconsumerism,itwaspopularisedasamarketingtrickbyclothingmanufacturersinthe1930s.

Tradepublicationscounselleddepartmentstoresthat,inordertoincreasesales,theyshouldcreatea“thirdstepstone”betweeninfantwearandolderkids’clothes.Itwasonlyafter“toddler”becameacommonshoppers’termthatitevolvedintoabroadlyaccepteddevelopmentalstage.Splittingkids,oradults,intoever-tiniercategorieshasprovedasure-firewaytoboostprofits.Andoneoftheeasiestwaystosegmentamarketistomagnifygenderdifferences–orinventthemwheretheydidnotpreviouslyexist.

Bysaying“itis…therainbow”(Line3,Para.1),theauthormeanspink .

cannotexingirls’lackofimagination

shouldnotbeassociatedwithgirls’innocence

shouldnotbethesolerepresentationofgirlhood

cannotinfluencegirls’livesandinterests

AccordingtoParagraph2,whichofthefollowingistrueofcolours?

Coloursareencodedingirls’DNA.

Blueusedtoberegardedasthecolourforgirls.

Whiteispreferredbybabies.

Pinkusedtobeaneutralcolourinsymbolisinggenders.

Theauthorsuggeststhatourperceptionofchildren’spsychologicaldevelopmentwasmuchinfluencedby

.

theobservationofchildren’snature

themarketingofproductsforchildren

researchesintochildren’sbehaviour

studiesofchildhoodconsumption

WemaylearnfromParagraph4thatdepartmentstoreswereadvisedto .

classifyconsumersintosmallergroups

attachequalimportancetodifferentgenders

focusoninfantwearandolderkids’clothes

createsomecommonshoppers’terms

Itcanbeconcludedthatgirls’attractiontopinkseemstobe .

fullyunderstoodbyclothingmanufacturers

clearlyexinedbytheirinborntendency

mainlyimposedbyprofit-drivenbusinessmen

wellinterpretedbypsychologicalexperts

Text3

In2010,afederaljudgeshookAmerica’sbiotechindustrytoitscore.CompanieshadwonpatentsforisolatedDNAfordecades–by2005some20%ofhumangeneswerepatented.ButinMarch2010ajudgeruledthatgeneswereunpatentable.Executiveswereviolentlyagitated.TheBiotechnologyIndustryOrganisation(BIO),atradegroup,assuredmembersthatthiswasjusta“preliminarystep”inalongerbattle.OnJuly29ththeywererelieved,atleasttemporarily.Afederalappealscourtoverturnedthepriordecision,rulingthatMyriadGeneticscouldindeedholdpatentstotwogenesthathelpforecastawoman’sriskofbreastcancer.ThechiefexecutiveofMyriad,a inUtah,saidtherulingwasablessingtofirmsandpatients

alike.

Butascompaniescontinuetheirattemptsat alisedmedicine,thecourtswillremainratherbusy.TheMyriadcaseitselfisprobablynotover.Criticsmakethreemainargumentsagainstgenepatents:ageneisaproductofnature,soitmaynotbepatented;genepatentssuppressinnovationratherthanrewardit;andpatents’monopoliesrestrictaccesstogenetictestssuchasMyriad’s.Agrowingnumberseemtoagree.Lastyearafederaltask-urgedreformforpatentsrelatedtogenetictests.InOctobertheDepartmentofJusticefiledabriefintheMyriadcase,arguingthatanisolatedDNAmolecule“isnolessaproductofnature…thanarecottonfibresthathavebeenseparatedfromcottonseeds.”

Despitetheappealscourt’sdecision,bigquestionsremainunanswered.Forexample,itisunclearwhetherthesequencingofawholegenomeviolatesthepatentsofindividualgeneswithinit.Thecasemayyetreach

theSupremeCourt.

Astheindustryadvances,however,othersuitsmayhaveanevengreaterimpact.CompaniesareunlikelytofilemanymorepatentsforhumanDNAmolecules–mostarealreadypatentedorinthepublic.Firmsarenowstudyinghowgenesinct,lookingforcorrelationsthatmightbeusedtodeterminethecausesofdiseaseorpredictadrug’sefficacy.Companiesareeagertowinpatentsfor“connectingthedots,”exinsHansSauer,alawyerfortheBIO.

Theirsuccessmaybedet

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论