下载本文档
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
中国西安
第六周:(Week6:2015.10.3—10.9)
配套音频讲解 :ht /s/1gdEVEGr
配套音频写作精讲 :ht /s/1o6xdPFG
Ifyoudoubtyourself,you’vealreadylosttherace.——UsainBolt
10.3(周六)
阅读学习计划
收听《读记单词》一书第129页的逐句精讲。
做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第203页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲
写作学习计划
精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第29篇和应用文写作第29篇的。
抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第29篇和应用文写作第29篇。
。
10.4(周日)
阅读学习计划
收听《读记单词》一书第123页的逐句精讲。
做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第202页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲
写作学习计划
精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第30篇和应用文写作第30篇的。
抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第30篇和应用文写作第30篇。
。
10.5(周一)
阅读学习计划
收听《读记单词》一书第118页的逐句精讲。
做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第200页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲
写作学习计划
精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第31篇和应用文写作第31篇的。
抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第31篇和应用文写作第31篇。
。
10.6(周二)
阅读学习计划
收听《读记单词》一书第112页的逐句精讲。
做《考点与常见错误透析》一书第199页的,然后收听此书的相关精讲
写作学习计划
精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第32篇和应用文写作第32篇的。
抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第32篇和应用文写作第32篇。
。
10.7(周三)
阅读学习计划
收听本周英语二阅读2-12-1的逐句精讲。(请见本周所附的原文)
做英语二阅读2-12-1的,然后收听此文的相关精讲。
写作学习计划
精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第40篇和应用文写作第40篇的。
抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第40篇和应用文写作第40篇。
10.8(周四)
阅读学习计划
收听本周英语二阅读2-12-2的逐句精讲。(请见本周所附的原文)
做英语二阅读2-12-2的,然后收听此文的相关精讲。
写作学习计划
精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第41篇和应用文写作第41篇的。
抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第41篇和应用文写作第41篇。
10.9(周五)
阅读学习计划
收听本周英语二阅读2-12-3的逐句精讲。(请见本周所附的原文)
做英语二阅读2-12-3的,然后收听此文的相关精讲。
写作学习计划
精听《写作突破100题》短文写作第42篇和应用文写作第42篇的。
抄写、背诵和默写《写作突破100题》短文写作第42篇和应用文写作第42篇。
附:英语二2012阅读
Text1
hasneverbeenterriblypopularwithstudentsandevenmanyparents,butinrecentyearsithasbeenparticularlyscorned.Schooldistrictsacrossthecountry,mostrecentlyLosAngelesUnified,arerevisingtheirthinkingonthiseducationalritual.Unfortunay,L.A.Unifiedhasproducedaninflexiblewhichmandatesthatwiththeexceptionofsomeadvancedcourses,maynolongercountformorethan10%ofastudent’sacademicgrade.
Thisruleismeanttoaddressthedifficultythatstudentsfromimpoverishedorchaotichomesmighthaveincompletingtheir.Buttheisunclearandcontradictory.Certainly,noshouldbeassignedthatstudentscannotcompleteontheirownorthattheycannotdowithoutexpensiveequipment.Butifthedistrictisessentiallygivingapasstostudentswhodonotdotheirbecauseofcomplicatedfamilylives,itisgoingriskilyclosetotheimplicationthatstandardsneedtobeloweredforpoorchildren.
Districtadministratorssaythatwillstillbeapartofschooling;teachersareallowedtoassignasmuchofitastheywant.Butwithcountingfornomorethan10%oftheirgrades,studentscaneasilyskiphalftheirandseeverylittledifferenceontheirreportcards.Somestudentsmightdowellonstatetestswithoutcompletingtheir,butwhataboutthestudentswhoperformedwellonthetestsanddidtheir?Itisquitepossiblethatthehelped.Yetratherthanempoweringteacherstofindwhatworksbestfortheirstudents,theimposesaflat,across-the-boardrule.
Atthesametime,theaddressesnoneofthetrulythornyquestionsabout.Ifthedistrictfindstobeunimportanttoitsstudents’academicachievement,itshouldmovetoreduceoreliminatetheassignments,notmakethemcountforalmostnothing.Conversely,ifmatters,itshouldaccountforasignificantportionofthegrade.Meanwhile,thisdoesnothingtoensurethatthestudentsreceiveismeaningfulorappropriatetotheirageandthesubject,orthatteachersarenotassigningmorethantheyarewillingtoreviewandcorrect.
Therulesshouldbeputonholdwhiletheschoolboard,whichisresponsibleforsettingeducational,looksintothematterandconductspublichearings.ItisnottoolateforL.A.Unifiedtodoright.
ItisimpliedinParagraph1thatnowadays .
isreceivingmorecriticism
isgainingmorepreferences
isnolongeraneducationalritual
isnotrequiredforadvancedcourses
L.A.Unifiedhasmadetheruleaboutmainlybecausepoorstudents .
tendtohavemoderateexpectationsfortheireducation
haveaskedforadifferenteducationalstandard
mayhaveproblemsfinishingtheir
havevoicedtheircomintsabout
AccordingtoParagraph3,oneproblemwiththeisthatitmay .
resultinstudents’indifferencetotheirreportcards
underminetheauthorityofstatetests
restrictteachers’powerineducation
discouragestudentsfromng
AsmentionedinParagraph4,akeyquestionunansweredaboutiswhether .
itshouldbeeliminated
itcountsmuchinschooling
itcesextraburdensonteachers
itisimportantforgrades
Asuitabletitleforthistextcouldbe .
AFaultyApproachto
A edforPoorStudents
ThornyQuestionsabout
WrongInterpretationsofanEducational
Text2
Prettyinpink:adultwomendonotrememberbeingsoobsessedwiththecolour,yetitispervasiveinouryounggirls’lives.Itisnotthatpinkisintrinsicallybad,butitissuchatinysliceoftherainbowand,thoughitmaycelebrategirlhoodinoneway,italsorepeatedlyandfirmlyfusesgirls’identitytoappearance.Thenitpresentsthatconnection,evenamongtwo-year-olds,betweengirlsasnotonlyinnocentbutasevidenceofinnocence.Lookingaround,Idespairedatthesingularlackofimaginationaboutgirls’livesandinterests.
Girls’attractiontopinkmayseemunavoidable,somehowencodedintheirDNA,butaccordingtoJoPaoletti,anassociateprofessorofAmericanStudies,itisnot.Childrenwerenotcolour-codedatalluntiltheearly20thcentury:intheerabeforedomesticwashingmachinesallbabiesworewhiteasapracticalmatter,sincetheonlywayofgettingclothescleanwastoboilthem.What’smore,bothboysandgirlsworewhatwerethoughtofasgender-neutraldresses.Whennurserycolourswereintroduced,pinkwasactuallyconsideredthemoremasculinecolour,apasversionofred,whichwasassociatedwithstrength.Blue,withitsintimationsoftheVirginMary,constancyandfaithfulness,symbolisedfemininity.Itwasnotuntilthemid-1980s,whenamplifyingageanddifferencesbecameadominantchildren’smarketingstrategy,thatpinkfullycameintoitsown,whenitbegantoseeminherentlyattractivetogirls,partofwhatdefinedthemasfemale,atleastforthefirstfewcriticalyears.
Ihadnotrealisedhowprofoundlymarketingtrendsdictatedourperceptionofwhatisnaturaltokids,includingourcorebeliefsabouttheirpsychologicaldevelopment.Takethetoddler.Iassumedthatphasewassomethingexpertsdevelopedafteryearsofresearchintochildren’sbehaviour:wrong.Turnsout,accordingtoDanielCook,ahistorianofchildhoodconsumerism,itwaspopularisedasamarketingtrickbyclothingmanufacturersinthe1930s.
Tradepublicationscounselleddepartmentstoresthat,inordertoincreasesales,theyshouldcreatea“thirdstepstone”betweeninfantwearandolderkids’clothes.Itwasonlyafter“toddler”becameacommonshoppers’termthatitevolvedintoabroadlyaccepteddevelopmentalstage.Splittingkids,oradults,intoever-tiniercategorieshasprovedasure-firewaytoboostprofits.Andoneoftheeasiestwaystosegmentamarketistomagnifygenderdifferences–orinventthemwheretheydidnotpreviouslyexist.
Bysaying“itis…therainbow”(Line3,Para.1),theauthormeanspink .
cannotexingirls’lackofimagination
shouldnotbeassociatedwithgirls’innocence
shouldnotbethesolerepresentationofgirlhood
cannotinfluencegirls’livesandinterests
AccordingtoParagraph2,whichofthefollowingistrueofcolours?
Coloursareencodedingirls’DNA.
Blueusedtoberegardedasthecolourforgirls.
Whiteispreferredbybabies.
Pinkusedtobeaneutralcolourinsymbolisinggenders.
Theauthorsuggeststhatourperceptionofchildren’spsychologicaldevelopmentwasmuchinfluencedby
.
theobservationofchildren’snature
themarketingofproductsforchildren
researchesintochildren’sbehaviour
studiesofchildhoodconsumption
WemaylearnfromParagraph4thatdepartmentstoreswereadvisedto .
classifyconsumersintosmallergroups
attachequalimportancetodifferentgenders
focusoninfantwearandolderkids’clothes
createsomecommonshoppers’terms
Itcanbeconcludedthatgirls’attractiontopinkseemstobe .
fullyunderstoodbyclothingmanufacturers
clearlyexinedbytheirinborntendency
mainlyimposedbyprofit-drivenbusinessmen
wellinterpretedbypsychologicalexperts
Text3
In2010,afederaljudgeshookAmerica’sbiotechindustrytoitscore.CompanieshadwonpatentsforisolatedDNAfordecades–by2005some20%ofhumangeneswerepatented.ButinMarch2010ajudgeruledthatgeneswereunpatentable.Executiveswereviolentlyagitated.TheBiotechnologyIndustryOrganisation(BIO),atradegroup,assuredmembersthatthiswasjusta“preliminarystep”inalongerbattle.OnJuly29ththeywererelieved,atleasttemporarily.Afederalappealscourtoverturnedthepriordecision,rulingthatMyriadGeneticscouldindeedholdpatentstotwogenesthathelpforecastawoman’sriskofbreastcancer.ThechiefexecutiveofMyriad,a inUtah,saidtherulingwasablessingtofirmsandpatients
alike.
Butascompaniescontinuetheirattemptsat alisedmedicine,thecourtswillremainratherbusy.TheMyriadcaseitselfisprobablynotover.Criticsmakethreemainargumentsagainstgenepatents:ageneisaproductofnature,soitmaynotbepatented;genepatentssuppressinnovationratherthanrewardit;andpatents’monopoliesrestrictaccesstogenetictestssuchasMyriad’s.Agrowingnumberseemtoagree.Lastyearafederaltask-urgedreformforpatentsrelatedtogenetictests.InOctobertheDepartmentofJusticefiledabriefintheMyriadcase,arguingthatanisolatedDNAmolecule“isnolessaproductofnature…thanarecottonfibresthathavebeenseparatedfromcottonseeds.”
Despitetheappealscourt’sdecision,bigquestionsremainunanswered.Forexample,itisunclearwhetherthesequencingofawholegenomeviolatesthepatentsofindividualgeneswithinit.Thecasemayyetreach
theSupremeCourt.
Astheindustryadvances,however,othersuitsmayhaveanevengreaterimpact.CompaniesareunlikelytofilemanymorepatentsforhumanDNAmolecules–mostarealreadypatentedorinthepublic.Firmsarenowstudyinghowgenesinct,lookingforcorrelationsthatmightbeusedtodeterminethecausesofdiseaseorpredictadrug’sefficacy.Companiesareeagertowinpatentsfor“connectingthedots,”exinsHansSauer,alawyerfortheBIO.
Theirsuccessmaybedet
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2024年度坂田二期医院消防安全评估与火灾应急演练合同
- 面向大数据场景的字符串数字转换算法改进
- 2024年度国际货物运输与保险合同
- 2024年度物联网项目实施与监理合同
- 林业投资与金融合作的机会与挑战考核试卷
- 乡村建设道路畅通方案
- 2024年度35kv变电站施工用水供应合同
- 2024年建筑企业战略联盟合同
- 2024年度KTV场所装修设计合同
- 2024年庚方环境监测系统建设与运营合同
- 屠宰场食品安全管理制度
- 部编版(2024秋)语文一年级上册 6 .影子课件
- 2024秋期国家开放大学专科《刑事诉讼法学》一平台在线形考(形考任务一至五)试题及答案
- 基于SICAS模型的区域农产品品牌直播营销策略研究
- 病例讨论英文
- 2024秋期国家开放大学专科《液压与气压传动》一平台在线形考(形考任务+实验报告)试题及答案
- 【课件】植物体的结构层次课件-2024-2025学年人教版生物七年级上册
- 24秋国家开放大学《0-3岁婴幼儿的保育与教育》期末大作业参考答案
- 相对湿度计算公式
- 2024版肿瘤患者静脉血栓防治指南解读 课件
- 商业银行开展非法集资风险排查活动情况报告
评论
0/150
提交评论