GRE写作高分经验分享

千里之行，始于第2页/共2页精品文档推荐GRE写作高分经验分享GRE写作高分阅历共享立论驳论文提分心得不行不看，快来看看吧,下面我就和大家共享，来观赏一下吧。

GRE写作高分阅历共享立论驳论文提分心得不行不看

以下就是我自己总结一点小技巧：首先，我在预备GRE写作备考时，最重要的一个步骤在于熟识题库和仔细预备提纲。

GRE立论文issue阅历共享

对于立论文(Issue)说，我觉得自己动手拟一份提纲是特别有用的，你可以参考各种资料，但必需勤动脑，想一想提纲的规律连续性。实际上，有偏向性、但又不要肯定化的思路才是最易上手的。

GRE驳论文argument怎么练?

对于驳论文(Argument)而言，我认为熟识题库更为重要。正常状况下是这样的，但的确有些难题若不事先好好预备，五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时，我正是由于在预备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目，而在正式考试时恰恰遇到了这道题目，所以写得很不好。

写驳论文有许多小窍门，如需要熬炼出区分“事实”和“观点”的力量，不论题目中所给的事实有多夸张都需认为它是对的，不能攻击，只能攻击观点中的规律漏洞;凡是跟统计数字、统计方法有关的规律错误都尽量不要攻击，最多只能一笔带过等等。

GRE作文规律重要吗?

虽然规律作文满分只有6分，可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说，它是GRE的精华——由于GRE考的就是规律，用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已，主要目的就是考察你的规律分析水平。

怎样看待GRE作文中的语言水平?

至于GRE作文的语言，其实不是很重要，只要通顺、没有语法错误就可以了，把握了这些就可以更好地备考GRE作文。盼望可以给大家一些参考，从而更好地备考GRE阅读考试。

新GRE写作：审查的公正性

题目：

Censorshipisrarely,ifever,justified.

审查很少能够做到公正。

范文：

“Censorship”isawordwhichseemstobeauthoritativeratherthandemocratic,whichimpliesthewillofthegovernorsratherthanthewillofgeneralpeople.Sincetheoccurrenceofthecensorship,whichcouldbetracedbacktotheAncientRome,ithasbeenplayinganimportantpartinthedomesticaffairswhiletoarouseapplauseandcondemnationaswell.Heretheourgovernmentfacesadilemma,isitfairtocarryonthecensorshipatthecostofsacrificingpartofdemocracy,orjustopenthegatelettingflowsofideasandthoughtsin,attheriskoflosingitsownrampart.

Sincecensorshipsuggestanactofchangingorsuppressingspeech,writingoranyotherformsofexpressionthatiscondemnedassubversiveofthecommongood,itmusthaveacloserelationshipwiththeonewhoappliessuchsupervision,andtheword“commongood”shouldberedefinedunderdifferentconditions.Thereistimewhenwewereallunderapowerfulmonarchy,andthe“commongood”isthe“monarchgood”,thenthecensorshipitselfistheinstrumentofthemonarchwhichsolelydependedonthewillofthemonarch;intheMiddleAges,boththeRomanCatholicandtheProtestantChurchespracticedcensorshipthatseemedtobeoppressivetoanyideaschallengingthedoctrinesofchurchesandtheexistenceofGod;evennow,insomeauthoritativecountries,thecensorshipisusedtoruleitspeoplebyrestrictingtheirminds,ofcourse,forthestabilityoftheirgoverningoverthepeople.Withtheseregards,censorshipitselfisquestionedattherationalityofexisting,regardlessofthepracticesmadebythedemocraticgovernment,whilethejusticeofthedemocraticgovernmentisquitedoubtable.

Thematterconcerningisnotonlywhopracticesthecensorshipbutalsohowitispracticed.Sincedifferentmenmakedifferentcommentsonthesameworkofart,forexample,itishardtosetupameasurebywhichwecoulddecidewhetheroneshouldbeprohibited,especiallytotheworkofarts,asitscontentalwayslabeledas“subversive”and“revolutionary”,twowordsdetestedbythegovernorsmost.SuchcasescouldbefoundinUlyssesbyJ.JoyceandLadyChatterley’sLoverbyD.HLawrence,thesetwogreatnovelswerefirstlyconsideredtobeguiltyofobscenityandwereputtoprohibitionbytheAmericangovernment,butturnedouttobetruemasterpiecestoday.Soanyformofcensorship,tosomeextent,lagsbehindthedevelopmentofideasandwillputmoreorlessanegativeeffectontheirdevelopment.

Thoughthecensorshipissuchadisgustingwordembodyingsomuchoppressionandmight,itisacompromisewemadewiththerealityfarfrombeingperfect,toprovideacomparativestablegroundwhichwecouldstandon.Atthispoint,Idon’tagreewiththeinstitutelikeACLUwhoopposeanycensorship.Thecensorship,thoughrarelyjustified,shouldexistaslongasamoreidealandpracticalformisfoundtoreplaceit,orwecouldonlyexpectourGodtocreateamoreidealspeciesinsteadofimperfecthumanbeings.

新GRE写作：权威问题

题目：

Muchoftheinformationthatpeopleassumeis‘factual’actuallyturnsouttobeinaccurate.Thus,anypieceofinformationreferredtoasa‘fact’shouldbemistrustedsinceitmaywellbeprovenfalseinthefuture.

大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不精确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应当被质疑，由于它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。

范文：

Shouldwebedoubtfultoalltheinformationathandsbecausetherightnessofwhichisuncertain?Thespeakerclaimsso,Iconcedethatpeopleoftencommitvariousfallaciesinthecourseofcognizingthings,howeverIfundamentallytakeexceptionofthearguersassertiontomistrusteveryfactwemightencounter.AndIwillsubstantiallydiscussmyviewsthereinafter.

Tobeginwith,thespeakerseemstoimplicatethatafactwouldbeprovenfalseinthefutureundernumerouscircumstance.NeverthelessIprefertoarguethatfactsneverchange.NomatterhowdidtheMedievalChurchandInquisitionpersecuteBruno,thefactneverchangesthattheearthisfarfrombeingthecenteroftheuniverseasthereligioussovereignshadassumedorhopedfor,whilejustaminorparticleinit.Equally,nomatterhowEdisonhadtriedtoincitethepublicfearanddistrusttothealternativecurrentelectricity,thefactneverchangesthatTeals’electricalsystemisvastlysuperiortohisdirectcurrentelectricalone,andwouldbeacceptedandappliedinlargerrange.

However,whatdochangearethehumansobjectiveinterpretationstofacts.Onecompellingargumenttothispointisthat,duetothelimitationofhuman’sknowledgeandcomprehensivecapability,theytendtomakeinsufficientorevenfalseunderstandingtothecertainfact.Anaptillustrationisthechangesofcognitiontodisease.Whileattheancienttime,ourprogenitorsbelievedtheamanbecomingapatientforthereasonthathehadconductcrimesoroffendedsomeghostsorspirits,thecontemporarypeoplehavewellknowthatthevariesofpathogensarethebasiccausestoourdiseases,andthedefectsofourimmunesystemandsofortharealsothefactorsaswell.Anotherargumentforthechangeofcomprehensiontofactisthatdifferentpeoplealwaysobserveandinterpretfromdifferentperspectives.ThoughtheRelativitytheoryisnotwellcompliablewiththeQuantummechanism,noonecallthegreatnessofbothEinsteinandBohr,becausetheirtheoriesarebasedondistinctviews,theformerfromthemacrocosmandthelaterfromthemicrocosm.

Notwithstandingtheforegoingreasonsforthathumantendtomakefallaciesduringthecauseofcomprehendingandcognizingfacts,thesereasonsshouldneverbetheexcusestodoubteveryconclusionwemightdrawfromfacts.Basedoncertainrationalinferenceandproperknowledgefundament,theconclusionswemakemightwellbejustifiable,ifnotcompletelyright,tocertaindegree.Whatweneedtodoistopromotetheenterpriseofpursuingthebetteranswerandtrytousetheresultwehavegettoapplication,insteadofwastingourtimetounduedoubtandsuspicion.Thoughthemedicalscientistshavenotfullyunderstoodthemechanismofhowthedoestheimplantedorgan