版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
EconEmpiricalStudiesinIndustrialOrganizationecon产业组织的实证研究第1页/共303页ThiscourseMygoalIntroducetherecentempiricalstudiesinindustrialorganization(IO)whatisIO?GiveyousomesenseofhowtoconductempiricalresearchinempiricalIOOfferanopportunitytodesignyourownresearchLearnaboutChineseeconomyandexploreresearchtopicsinChinaRationalelearnfromeachotherfreetocriticizeorgivefeedbackencourageclassdiscussion第2页/共303页WhatmakesagoodEmpiricalIOEconomist?AgoodempiricalIOstudyshouldbeagoodmatchofIOtheory,realdata,andempiricalestimationstartwithaninterestingandimportantquestionbeagoodconsumeroftheoreticalliteraturebeagoodconsumerofeconometricsbeanentrepreneurindatacollectionemphasizeempiricalidentificationclarifymainstoryandalternativeexplanations第3页/共303页NewSyllabus(changesinred)5themes,eachthemehas:2-4papersforlecture,1casediscussionor1studentpresentationstudentsareexpectedtoreadpapersbeforeclassengageinclassdiscussion(20%)2refereereports(40%)Duedates:April4,April24ResearchProposaldueJune15(40%)Yourownidea(original)Reviewofrelatedliterature,clarifyyourcontributionDesigndatarequirementsandestimationstrategyPresentinfrontoftheclass(30-min,optional)第4页/共303页CommonshorthandAEJ:AmericanEconomicJournalAER:AmericanEconomicReviewEJ:EconomicJournalEI:EconomicInquiryJPE:JournalofPoliticalEconomyJEMS:JournalofEconomics&ManagementStrategyJF:JournalofFinanceJIE:JournalofIndustrialEconomicsJHE:JournalofHealthEconomicsNBER-WP:NationalBureauofEconomicResearch(NBER)workingpaperQJE:QuarterlyJournalofEconomicsRAND:RANDJournalofEconomicsReStat:ReviewofEconomicStatisticsReStud:ReviewofEconomicStudiesRQ:researchquestionSSRN:SocialScienceResearchNetwork第5页/共303页Theme#1:PricingStrategyDefinitionofPriceDiscriminationPricediscriminationinautomobilesAyresandSiegelmanAER95GoldbergJPE96Whydiscriminate?ListQJE2004AnexampleofstructuralestimationonsecondaryticketmarketLeslieandSorensen,Stanfordworkingpaper2008第6页/共303页DefinePriceDiscriminationSimilarproductsaresoldtodifferentconsumersatdifferentprices,andthedifferenceinpricecannotbeexplainedbyanydifferenceincost.Typesofpricediscrimination:First-degreeSecond-degreeThird-degree第7页/共303页NecessaryConditions
forPriceDiscriminationThereexistssomeconsumerheterogeneityFirm(s)havesomedegreeofmarketpower(i.e.downwardslopingdemand)Noarbitrage第8页/共303页Whyareresearchersinterestedin
pricediscrimination?TheRobinson-PatmanActof1936makesitunlawfultodiscriminatebyraceandgenderwelfareimplicationonpricediscriminationisambiguousProfit-maximizingsellersalwayspreferpricediscriminationtouniformpriceComparedtouniformpricing,consumersthatarediscriminatedagainstwillbeworseoffbuttheotherconsumerswillbebetteroff第9页/共303页Empiricallydetect
pricediscriminationneeddataontransactionpricecostdifferencevs.mark-updifferenceconsiderthepossibilityofarbitragedefinemarketpower:petitivemarkets第10页/共303页AyresandSiegelman1995AERRQ:Istherethirddegreepricediscriminationinnewcarretailmarkets?Whyinteresting?Itisunlawfultodiscriminatebyraceandgender(Robinson-PatmanActof1936)RentdistributionbetweencarmanufacturersandcardealersShedlightonthepricingstrategyofdealers/manufacturers–whynegotiateratherthanchargelistprice?
第11页/共303页AyresandSiegelman1995AER
ResearchDesignChicagoarea,9carmodelsMatchedpairsofindividualconsumers,onlydifferbyraceandgenderFollowexactlythesamebargainingprocess(twoprocesses?)Recordeverynegotiationprice,includingthefinaloffersevenifthereisadisagreementWhyuseacontrolledexperiment?
第12页/共303页AyresandSiegelman1995AER
Findings
InitialFinalWhitemale00Whitefemale200+130+Blackfemale450+440+Blackmale1000+1100+第13页/共303页AyresandSiegelman1995AER
PossibleInterpretationsTherearesignificantpricedifferencesbyraceandgenderThisdoesnotdisappearforblackdealersNotsurewhetheritisdrivenbyanimusdiscriminationorbystatisticaldiscriminationAnimus:distasteofdoingbusinesswithminoritiesStatistical:useobservablecharacteristicstomakestatisticalinferenceaboutthereservationvalueofconsumersLittledifferencebetweeninitialandfinaloffers,probablybecausethe“consumers”followexactlythesamebargainingprocess.Forthesamereason,itdoesnotdetectanydiscriminationbasedonbargainingabilitySpecifictoChicagoandtheninetestedcarmodels?
第14页/共303页Goldberg1996JPE
ComparisonwithAyresandSiegelman95Samequestionbutdifferentresearchdesign:
A&S95Goldberg96AuditstudyCESobservationalAreaChicagoWholeUSConsumersInd.testersFam./HHStrategySamebargainingPotentiallydifferentbargainingModel9carmodelsAlarge#ofmodelsPriceEverynegotiationpriceOnlythefinalprice,withmeasurementerror第15页/共303页Goldberg1996JPE
FindingscomparisonTheraceandgenderdifferenceinfinalpriceisnotaslargeandnotstatisticalsignificant
A&S95Goldberg96InitialPFinalPFinalPWhitemale000Whitefemale200+130+120-130+Blackfemale450+440+426+Blackmale1000+1100+274+第16页/共303页Whydifferent?SampledifferenceGoldbergsubjectstosampleselection(ononlyfinishedsalesandself-selectionintodealerships)GoldberghasmeasurementerrorsonbothleftandrighthandsidevariablesGoldbergcoverslargerareasandmorecarmodelsGoldbergcapturesdiscriminationsthatareassumedawayinA&S?DiscriminationbybargainingInitialoffersreflectstatisticaldiscriminationbyraceandgender,butdiscriminationbybargainingcancelsouttheinitialdiscrimination?
第17页/共303页MoredetectionFirstofferdoesnotnecessarilyreflectthemeantransactionpriceFirstoffercoulddiffersubstantiallyifthemeantransactionpriceisthesameacrossraceandgenderbutthedistributionofreservevalueismoredispersedforminoritiesandfirstofferreflectstheuppertailCheckvarianceofprice(Table4),quantileregression(Table3)
第18页/共303页Follow-upstudiesHarlessandHoffer(AERMarch2002)“DoWomenPayMoreforNewVehicles?EvidencefromTransactionPriceData”UsetransactionpricefromJ.D.PowerFinddiscriminationbycartypeandagegroup,butnotbygenderScottMortonetal.(2002)“ConsumerInformationandPriceDiscrimination:DoestheInternetAffectthePricingofNewCarstoWomenandMinorities?”SSRN#288527ThesameJ.D.PowertransactionpricedataAfrican-AmericanandHispanicspay2%($500)moreinofflinetransaction,but65%ofthisdifferencecanbeexplainedbyotherobservables.FindnoevidenceforstatisticalracediscriminationSmallpricepremiumforwomen(0.43%,$100)NosignificantdifferenceinonlinepriceInternetprovideslesscueforracialdiscrimination--noInterneterasessearchcost–yesConclusion:discriminationonnon-racialdifferencesacrossindividuals,notstatisticaldiscriminationbasedonrace--maybetheindividualcharacteristicsarerevealedinthebargainingprocess?
第19页/共303页ListQJE2004Sourceofobserveddiscrimination:AnimusStatisticalBargainingabilityFieldexperiment(differentfromanauditstudylikeA&S95)TradersendogenouslyselectintothemarketMorelikelyhavepreviousexperiencebuying,sellingandtradingActivecontrolonconfoundingfactors第20页/共303页ListQJE2004
ExperimentalITreatmentB:NondealerbuyersnegotiatewithdealersellersTreatmentS:NondealersellersnegotiatewithdealerbuyersFourgroups:whitemaleaged20-30 whitefemaleaged20-30 non-whitemaleaged20-30 whitemaleaged60+
第21页/共303页ListQJE2004
resultsonexperimentIResultsofTreatmentBandTreatmentS:Initialofferstominoritiesareinferior.Finaloffersareinferiortominoritiestoo,butthedifferenceisnotasgreatastheinitialoffers.Previousexperienceofnon-dealershelpeliminatetheminoritybias,butittakeslongerinnegotiation.Experienceddealersexercisemorediscriminationthannon-experienceddealers.Theseresultsprovetheexistenceofpricediscrimination,butdonotdistinguishbetweenthethreepossiblesourcesofdiscrimination
第22页/共303页ListQJE2004
Whereisthesmokinggun?Dictatorgameofadealersplitting$5toapersonthatbelongstoaspecificdemographicgroup(doubleblinddesignwithopaqueenvelopeandblankpaper)noevidenceofanimusdiscrimination第23页/共303页ListQJE2004
Whereisthesmokinggun?ChamberlainExperiment:Buyerreservationvaluesarerandomlydrawn,butsellersmayormaynotknowthisTreatmentRandomTreatmentUnclearWhythesetwotreatmentscanidentifystatisticaldiscriminationfromdiscriminationbybargainingability?
第24页/共303页ListQJE2004
Whereisthesmokinggun?ResultsTreatmentrandomvs.TreatmentclearMajoritybuyersdobetterthanminoritybuyers,butonlyinTreatmentUnclearExperienceddealersdobetterthaninexperienceddealers(moreobviousinTreatmentRandom)ExperienceddealersdoworseinTreatmentUnclearthanexperienceddealersinTreatmentRandomConclusion:Statisticaldiscriminationismorelikelythandiscriminationbybargainingability
第25页/共303页ListQJE2004
Whereisthesmokinggun?TheactualdistributionofconsumerreservationvalueSolicitedbyVickey’ssecondpriceauctionAskdealerstomatchtwoconsumer-valuedistributionswithspecificdemographicgroups
第26页/共303页ListQJE2004
ConclusionandremainingquestionsStatisticaldiscriminationisthemostlikelyexplanationExperienceddealersusetheirknowledgetoexercisemorestatisticaldiscrimination(whydoesittakelongtolearnthis?)Experimentereffectonthedictatorgame?Whathappenedduringthenegotiation(inExperimentIandtheChamberlainmarket)?Willthisonlyapplytonegotiationmarkets?WhyList(2004)andScottMortonetal.(2002)reachdifferentconclusion?
第27页/共303页RelatedstudiesRustandHallJPE2003“MiddlemenversusMarketMakers:ATheoryofCompetitiveExchange”Marketmakersvs.secretpriceWhypostingpricevs.bilateralbargaining?PricesearchiscostlyGong(2006)dissertationextendsRustandHallEndogenousentryofmarketmakersCollusionofmarketmakers?LabexperimentsListandPrice(2005RAND):fieldexperimentsincollusionandsecretpricecuts–dependsoninformationandexperienceNASDAQvs.NYSE?MatthewWhite(UpennWharton,workinginprogress):theimpactofcentralizedtradingonthepriceofwholesaleelectricity
第28页/共303页CaseDiscussionTheChildren'sHospitalofTianjinhasstartedtosellthreetypesofconsumercards.Theyallowcardbuyersahigherprioritytomakedoctorappointmentatthehospital.(NewsreportedinBeijingQingNianBao2/18/2009)Classdiscussion–fivegroupsofstudents,eachrepresentsadifferentplayerinthisproblemHospitalBroker(whoissuesthecardsforthehospital)PatientsthathaveboughtorwillbuythecardsPatientsthatdonotwanttobuythecardsRegulator
第29页/共303页Leslie&Sorensen(2008)“TheWelfareEffectsofTicketResale”Widespreadhostilityagainstticketresale,recenttrendsinfavorofticketresale(e.g.MLB,artists)Economicintuition:voluntarytradeshouldenhanceefficiencyandresultinanallocationthatimprovesocialwelfareEconomicplayers:PrimaryproducersBrokers(scalpers)Tradingintermediaries(eBayandStubHub)ConsumersRegulators
第30页/共303页Whyresale?ConsumerdemandchangesbetweentheprimaryandsecondarymarketsPrimarymarketismis-pricedsellerstakepridein“soldout”,sometimesformarketingreasonssellershavedifficultyanticipatingthedemandpreciselyseatqualityvariestoagreatdealbutonlyalimitednumberofpricingpointsareallowedintheprimarymarket
第31页/共303页ResearchQuestionMeasurethewelfareeffectofticketresale:whoisbetterofforworseoffbytheintroduction(orshow-down)ofticketresale?MeasureitforeachplayerfirstandthensumupthetotalwelfareeffectsprimaryproducersBrokers(scalpers)TradingintermediariesConsumers
第32页/共303页LiteratureEffectofresaleonprimarysellersDifference-in-Differencebyvariationsinstateanti-scalpinglaws(Williams1994,Depken2007)DepVar=primaryprice,MixedresultsTheories:Swofford99,Courty03,KarpandKerloff05,Geng,WuandWinston04)0or+dependingonassumptionsaboutdemanduncertainty,brokerriskattitude/cost/revenue/informationEffectofresaleonconsumersPro:easieraccesstotheeventCon:higherpriceDifferbytypeofconsumersElfenbein2005:stricteranti-scalpinglawsreducescompetitionamongresellers,leadingtofewerticketssoldandhigherprices
第33页/共303页Howdoesresalework?Stage0:primarysellerssetprimarypricesStage1:ConsumersandbrokersparticipateintheprimarymarketconditionalontheirexpectationaboutthesecondarymarketStage2:Ticketsupplyanddemandinthesecondarymarketdependontheticketsandpricesoldintheprimarymarket
第34页/共303页TomodelresaleempiricallyCanprimarysellerschangeticketpriceovertime?Canprimarysellersendorseresaleandsharerevenuefromthesecondarymarket?Howwouldprimarysellersadjustprimarypricegivendifferentsettingsofthesecondarymarket?Shallweallowindividualstoendogenouslychoosewhethertoparticipateprimaryorsecondarymarketsduetotransactioncost?Shallwedistinguishbrokersfromrealconsumers?Yes.Shallweallowbuyeruncertainty?Theauthorsallowscheduleconflict,randomparticipation
第35页/共303页ProandConofthispaperCons:Takingprimaryproducersandtheirbehaviorasgiven.CannotanswerhowtheopeningofticketresalemarketaffectsproducersPros:allowbuyersintheprimarymarkettoresellinthesecondarymarketactivities.AllowtheirprimarymarketbuydecisiondependsontheirexpectationofthesecondarymarketdistinguishrealconsumersandbrokersEstimatewelfareeffects
第36页/共303页DataPrimarymarket:TicketMaster,103concertsof18artistsinthesummerof2004Transactionprice,dayoftransaction,section/row/seat/lawn,seatquality(relative,notabsolute)Secondarymarket:allticketssoldoneBayandStubHubinthesummerof2004Transactionprice,dayoflistingandtransaction,section/row/lawnDoesnotcapturethefullsecondarymarket2-5%ticketsresold,39%ofpricemarkupfromticket'sfacevalue,totalresalerevenuecomparableto6%ofticketrevenue.Someticketsareover-sold,someareunder-soldrelativetofacevalueFinervariationbyseatquality
第37页/共303页第38页/共303页第39页/共303页Model–primarymarketBuyersrandomlyarriveattheprimarymarket,choosefromthepoolofunsoldticket,andcannotbuymorethan1ticketConsumerutilityforeventkseatj:BrokerutilityfromtheeventiszeroConsumersandbrokersareforward-looking
第40页/共303页Model–secondarymarketAlltheticketssoldintheprimarymarketisonsaleinthesecondarymarketviaasequenceofprivate-value,second-priceauctionwithlimitedbuyerparticipationOrderofresalegoesfromthehighestqualitytickettothelowestqualityticketBuyerparticipationisrandomandlimitedtoLbiddersineachresaleauction
第41页/共303页SourcesofuncertaintyRandomarrivalofbuyersBuyer'swtpistheirownprivateinfo,andthereisuncertaintyaboutthedistributionofwtp==>BuyersarenotsureabouttheallocationofticketsintheprimarymarketOtherwisebrokerscannotlosemoneyPotentialscheduleconflict,mayberelatedtowtpRandomparticipationinresaleauction
AsimplifyingassumptionMainlytoaccommodatethefactthatpriceisnotamonotonicfunctionofseatqualityeverywhere,thoughtheincreasingrelationshipistrueonaverage第42页/共303页ObjectivefunctionsResaleprice:Broker'sproblemConsumer'sproblem
第43页/共303页EstimationroadmapKeyparametersaretransactioncostsandalltheuncertaintyparametersForanysetofkeyparameters,weneedtomodelforward-lookingbasedontheassumptionofrationalexpectationEstimationhastwoloops:Outerloop:searchforkeyparameterstomatchtheempiricaldata–simulatedGMMInnerloop:findrationalexpectationforforward-lookingagents–fixedpoint
第44页/共303页Estimation–innerloop#1Givenparametersetα,abuyer'sexpectedutilityattheprimarymarketisrepresentedbyfunctionTheinnerloopneedstofindthevalueofαtoreachthefixedpointoftheVfunction
第45页/共303页Estimation–innerloop#2HowtofindafixedpointofV?Givenα0,simulatetheoptimalbehavior→V1RegressV1onvariablesinVfunction→α1RepeatuntilconvergenceonVConvergenceonV:WhereM=#ofbuyers,S=#ofdraws
第46页/共303页Estimation–outerloopIntheouterloopsearchforkeyparametersontransactioncosts,uncertaintyparameters,andeventfixedeffectsSimulatedgeneralizedmethodofmoments(GMM)Total111momentsfor110parameters:Fractionofavailableticketssoldinprimarymktforeachevent(103parameters)Averagefractionresoldbyconsumers(1)Averagefractionresoldbybrokers(1)Averageresaleprice(1)Averagequalityofresoldtickets(1)25thand75thpercentileoftheresalepricedistribution(2)25thand75thpercentileoftheresaleseatqualitydistribution(2)
第47页/共303页Identification110parameters:Eventdummies(103):ticketssoldpereventConsumerpremiumforhighqualitytickets(Φ):price-qualitycurveMeanofaverageconsumerwtp(λ-bar):price-qualitycurve,resalepriceofhigh-qualityticketsStdevofaverageconsumerwtp(σλ):fractionofticketsresoldatalossPrevelenceofbroker(β):fractionofbrokersintheresalemarketConsumertransactioncost(τc):fractionofticketsresoldbyconsumersathighversuslowexpectedmark-upBrokertransactioncost(τb):fractionofticketsresoldbybrokersathighversuslowexpectedmark-upProbabilityofscheduleconflict(ψ):therelativerateatwhichconsumersversusbrokersresellbelowfacevalue
第48页/共303页第49页/共303页第50页/共303页第51页/共303页ConclusionInthecontextofrockconcerts,allowingresaledoesnotresultindramaticwelfareimprovement,butlowertransactioncostswill.Resalemakessomebetteroff(resellingbrokersandconsumers),someworseoff(consumerswhoattendtheevent,slightlylowerrevenueforprimaryproducers)Limitations:Noequilibriumanalysisonproducers,thismayapplytothisdata,butitalsorestrictsthepotentialofapplyingthispaper'sconclusiontootherresalemarketsAlotofrobustnesschecksareneededbeforewebelievetheresults,especiallystructuralassumptionsCanweusemoremomentstoestimatethemodelortestthefitoftheestimation?Noaccountforthetimingofresale(AndrewSweeting2008)
第52页/共303页Theme2:Collusion
CompetitionpatternsPerfectcompetition(firmasprice-taker,homogenousgoods,perfectandcompleteinformation,freeentry)Monopolisticcompetition(firmsareprice-setters,heterogeneousgoods,zero-profitinthelongrun)Bertrand(firmssetprice,homogenousgoods,fixed#offirms)Cournot(firmssetquantity,homogenousgoods,fixed#offirms)Monopoly(collusion)Collusionmakesmoreprofitsbecauseittakesintoaccountthecross-elasticitybetweencompetingfirms第53页/共303页WikiDefinitionofCollusion
Collusionisanagreement,usuallysecretive,whichoccursbetweentwoormorepersonstodeceive,mislead,ordefraudothersoflegalrights,ortoobtainanobjectiveforbiddenbylawtypicallyinvolvingfraudorgaininganunfairadvantageandcaninvolve"wagefixing,kickbacks,ormisrepresentingtheindependenceoftherelationshipbetweenthecolludingparties."[1]Acartelisaformal(explicit)agreementamongfirms.Cartelsusuallyoccurinanoligopolisticindustry,wherethereareasmallnumberofsellersandusuallyinvolvehomogeneousproducts.Cartelmembersmayagreeonsuchmattersaspricefixing,totalindustryoutput,marketshares,allocationofcustomers,allocationofterritories,bidrigging,establishmentofcommonsalesagencies,andthedivisionofprofitsorcombinationofthese.Theaimofsuchcollusionistoincreaseindividualmember'sprofitsbyreducingcompetition.第54页/共303页ShermanAct
CollusionisperseillegalPricefixingBidriggingTerritorialorcustomerallocationamongcompetitorsIdenticalpricedoesnotnecessarilyentailcollusion.Similarly,thefactthatallpricesarenotidenticaldoesnotindicatetheabsenceofcollusionAntitrustevidence(/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title7/ant00008.htm)ExplicitagreementamongcompetitorsRecordsofchangesorpricesCompetitors’meetings,phoneconversationTestimonyfromacartelmember第55页/共303页CollusionStability
Collusionisinherentlyunstablebecauseeachmemberhasincentivetodeviateandsecretlyundercutthepriceorexpandproduction.Detectionofviolatorsmaybetoughifthereareunpredictablerandomfactorsindemandandsupply.Evenworseifthefactorsarenotperfectlyobservabletoothercartelmembers.Cartelstabilityisalsosubjecttopotentialentriesbecausecartelmakesmorethannormalprofits.第56页/共303页Empiricaldifficulty
indetectingcollusion
Multipleequilibriabyfolktheorem:manypayoffsbetweenperfectcompetitionandmonopolycanbesupportedbycartelDemandandsupplyshiftersmaybeunobservabletoeconometricians,butobservabletocartelNeedtoaccommodateentriesandpotentialstrategicelementsinentrydeterrenceIfthetheoryworks,wewillneverobservedeviationfromthecollusiveequilibrium.Collusiveequilibriumdependsonbeliefsofhowcompetitorsbehaveinoff-equilibriumpaths,whicheconometricianscannotobserveLackofbenchmarkpricedistributionthatreflectsnon-collusion第57页/共303页LiteratureonConductParameter
TimBresnahan“Empiricalstudiesofindustrieswithmarketpower”,inSchmalanseeandWilligeditedTheHandbookofIndustrialOrganization,volII,1989KenCorts“Conductparametersandthemeasurementofmarketpower”JournalofEconometrics1999第58页/共303页LiteratureonConductParameter
ConjecturalvariationmodelextendstheclassicalBertrandandCournot:firmsmayholdnon-zeroconjecturesabouttheirrivals’responsestochangesintheirstrategiesFirmiexpectsrivals’aggregateoutputisRi(qi).Defineri=R’i(qi)Firmi’sfirstorderconditionis:(definessupplyfunc.)Conductparameter第59页/共303页LiteratureonConductParameter
Conductparameter:0correspondstoperfectcompetition1correspondstoclassicalCournotNcorrespondstocollusionConductparameterLernerIndexIndustrydemandelasticity第60页/共303页CriticismonConductParameter
NocoherenttheoryforbehaviorsbeyondthethreeextremesEvennotgoodattestingthethreeextremesbecausetheta=1couldbeconsistentwithanylevelofmarketpowerwhendemandisiidIntheory,conductparametermeasureshowthecompetitorsrespondtoachangeoffirmi’sstrategy.Inreality,itmeasureshowequilibriumoutputvarieswithshiftsinexogenousvariables.Thesetwoaren’tthesame,notevenasymptotically.Corts(1999)showsthatthemismeasurementoftheconductparametercouldbequitesevere.第61页/共303页CriticismonConductParameter
NocoherenttheoryforbehaviorsbeyondthethreeextremesEvennotgoodattestingthethreeextremesbecausetheta=1couldbeconsistentwithanylevelofmarketpowerwhendemandisiidIntheory,conductparametermeasureshowthecompetitorsrespondtoachangeoffirmi’sstrategy.Inreality,itmeasureshowequilibriumoutputvarieswithshiftsinexogenousvariables.Thesetwoaren’tthesame,notevenasymptotically.Corts(1999)showsthatthemismeasurementoftheconductparametercouldbequitesevere.第62页/共303页PorterBELL1983
RQ:Isthegrainpricefluctuationduring1880-1886attributabletocollusivebehavioroftheJointExecutiveCommittee,orsomethingelse?Whyinteresting?Alotoftheories,littleempiricalevidenceProvidemoreinsightsforantitrustefforts?Data:p,qovertime第63页/共303页PorterBELL1983--theory
Collusionwithimperfectdetection:pricemaydecline(thusqmayincrease)duetodemanduncertaintyorsecretpricecutCollusionissupportedbyswitchingtoamorecompetitivemarketsupplyifthepriceistooloworthetotalquantitysuppliedistoohighGivenuncertaindemand,theoptimalchoiceofdetectingmechanismdoesnotsupportthemonopolyprice.Infact,thecollusiveequ.haslargerquantityandlowerpricethanperfectcollusion(tradeoffshort-runprofitswithlong-runstability)GreenandPorter1984showshowtouseCournotasapunishmenttosupportperfectcollusion.Thisisnottheexactmodelthispapertests,butitmotivatestheeconometricsstructure.Detectfluctuationwithinthecollusiveequ,noton/offequ.第64页/共303页PorterBELL1983--Model
Demand:Supply:(supplysidebasedonconductparameter)θ=0forBertrand;HerfindahlforCournot,1forcollusionIdentification:useentryandregimeshiftsassupplyshiftertoidentifydemanduselakeseasonsasdemandshiftertoidentifysupplyregimeshiftsareunobservable!AssumingIitconformsiidBernoulli(0/1),useE-MalgorithmtoidentifyIit第65页/共303页PorterBELL1983--assumptions
Q:Lakeseasonispredictable,butthetheoryemphasizesunpredictablefactors.Contradiction?Lakedummyhelpsidentifythesupplycurve,butwhattriggerstheregimeshiftistheunobservableandunpredictablepartoftheerrortermU_1t.Keyassumptions:Assumeawaytheactiveroleofentryandexit,andthereforeentryonlyshiftsthesupplycurvebyaconstantAssumeindependentdrawsofregimeshiftingratherthanpathdependent.Claimsthatthiswouldnotgeneratetoomuchbiasifthenumberofreversionaryepisodesissmallrelativetothesamplesize Errortermsarenormal第66页/共303页PorterBELL1983–keyidentif
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 二零二五年度高性能混凝土材料承包协议3篇
- 2024版物流运输购销合同范本
- 2025年新员工试用期间劳动合同范本3篇
- 主体墙面刷漆施工专项合同版B版
- 2025年度货运司机安全责任合同3篇
- 二零二五年度二手商品摊位租赁与交易平台合作协议3篇
- 二零二五年餐厅员工加班及休息时间合同范本3篇
- 2024聘用培训讲师合作协议书包含师资评估体系3篇
- 2024茶叶行业市场开拓与推广合同
- 2024的证券居间合同
- 《国有控股上市公司高管薪酬的管控研究》
- 餐饮业环境保护管理方案
- 人教版【初中数学】知识点总结-全面+九年级上册数学全册教案
- 食品安全分享
- 矿山机械设备安全管理制度
- 计算机等级考试二级WPS Office高级应用与设计试题及答案指导(2025年)
- 造价框架协议合同范例
- 糖尿病肢端坏疽
- 心衰患者的个案护理
- 医护人员礼仪培训
- 无人机飞行安全协议书
评论
0/150
提交评论