施有机肥和复合肥对云南红豆杉苗影响试验报告

林业田间试验云南红豆杉试验设计报告小区号123456789处理组合246031857小区编号2-1234-1236-1230-1233-1231-1238-1235-1237-123复合肥0.00.0250.050.00.0250.00.10.050.1有机肥0.50.50.50.250.00.00.50.00.0处理号指标处理组合0处理组合1处理组合2处理组合3处理组合4处理组合5处理组合6处理组合7处理组合8平均1.81.61.71.81.41.91.61.41.8标准误差0.0540.0930.0900.0580.0900.0650.0930.1370.075中位数1.81.71.81.81.51.91.71.71.9众数2.11.91.81.91.32.21.80.02.0标准差0.2980.5110.4910.3180.4910.3550.5070.7490.410方差0.0890.2610.2410.1010.2410.1260.2570.5610.168峰度-0.051.470.52-0.261.24-0.632.10-0.301.79偏度-0.46-1.11-0.62-0.35-0.77-0.36-1.49-0.94-0.78区域1.32.22.11.22.21.42.22.42.0最小值1.10.10.31.10.11.10.00.00.6最大值2.42.32.52.32.32.52.22.42.7求和54.847.050.353.043.157.346.642.055.4观测数303030303030303030最大(1)2.42.32.52.32.32.52.22.42.7最小(1)1.10.10.31.10.11.10.00.00.6置信度(95.0%)0.10.20.20.10.20.10.20.30.2变异系数16.3032.6329.2918.0134.1618.5932.6453.4522.17处理号指标处理组合0处理组合1处理组合2处理组合3处理组合4处理组合5处理组合6处理组合7处理组合8平均1.61.71.91.61.71.51.71.31.9标准误差0.0710.1130.1130.0590.0860.0660.1130.1520.098中位数1.61.61.91.51.61.41.81.31.8众数#N/A1.58#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A#N/A0#N/A标准差0.3880.6190.6200.3210.4700.3620.6220.8350.536方差0.1500.3830.3840.1030.2210.1310.3860.6970.287峰度0.512-0.549-0.146-0.709-0.389-0.5190.557-0.5320.594偏度0.5850.5440.0910.435-0.1990.500-0.772-0.0800.457区域1.82.32.71.21.91.32.63.12.5最小值0.90.80.41.10.60.90.00.00.7最大值2.73.13.12.32.42.22.63.13.2求和48.052.255.647.749.843.850.140.356.2观测数303030303030303030最大(1)2.73.13.12.32.42.22.63.13.2最小(1)0.90.80.41.10.60.90.00.00.7置信度(95.0%)0.10.20.20.10.20.10.20.30.2变异系数24.21735.55533.45020.19628.32724.81837.25362.14028.570处理号指标处理组合0处理组合1处理组合2处理组合3处理组合4处理组合5处理组合6处理组合7处理组合8平均0.60.40.60.50.40.60.50.50.6标准误差0.0500.0620.0740.0500.0620.0540.0560.0760.059中位数0.50.50.50.50.30.70.50.40.6众数0.80.00.00.00.00.80.00.00.0标准差0.2720.3380.4060.2720.3410.2950.3040.4150.321方差0.0740.1140.1650.0740.1160.0870.0930.1720.103峰度-0.034-1.055-1.1360.5680.4011.2900.557-0.5480.164偏度0.3480.0440.097-0.0330.8760.2770.1960.497-0.191区域1.21.01.31.21.21.51.31.51.3最小值0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0最大值1.21.01.31.21.21.51.31.51.3求和16.713.316.616.110.719.413.913.618.8观测数303030303030303030最大(1)1.21.01.31.21.21.51.31.51.3最小(1)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0置信度(95.0%)0.10.10.20.10.10.10.10.20.1变异系数48.95876.00373.23450.70595.95545.64465.83391.40351.306处理号指标处理组合0处理组合1处理组合2处理组合3处理组合4处理组合5处理组合6处理组合7处理组合8平均56.957.377.654.351.359.262.454.158.4标准误差3.3333.7005.1683.0122.9213.1514.5105.5713.150中位数52.355.378.051.849.558.361.356.060.8众数50.535.547.043.041.058.590.50.063.5标准差18.25420.26728.30516.49516.00117.26124.70330.51117.252方差333.20410.73801.18272.07256.03297.94610.23930.93297.64峰度-0.356-0.512-0.7490.0310.145-0.3390.639-0.484-0.057偏度0.5360.282-0.1210.6350.6360.270-0.170-0.550-0.021区域65.577.5114.566.564.569.0117.5106.576.5最小值28.020.018.029.526.528.00.00.023.5最大值93.597.5132.596.091.097.0117.5106.5100.0求和1707.01719.02326.51630.01539.01776.01872.51624.01752.5观测数303030303030303030最大(1)93.597.5132.596.091.097.0117.5106.5100.0最小(1)28.020.018.029.526.528.00.00.023.5置信度(95.0%)6.87.610.66.26.06.49.211.46.4变异系数32.08035.36936.49930.35831.19129.15739.57756.36329.533差异源离差平方和自由度均方Fp树高处理组合间0.65930.2200.8740.455误差66.8322660.251总数67.491269地径处理组合间1.17230.3911.2160.304误差85.4592660.321总数86.631269胸径处理组合间0.45230.1511.2920.278误差30.9962660.117总数31.447269冠幅处理组合间5110.37531703.4583.4580.017误差131023.367266492.569总数136133.742269ANalpha=0.05的子集12Duncana,b26052.816746056.275056.275036060.808360.808319063.9167显著性0.0510.063Waller-Duncana,b,c26052.816746056.275056.275036060.808360.808319063.9167由处理组合间胸径的方差分析结果，即上表可以看0.01<p=0.017<0.05,即各处理组合间的差异性达到显著水平。说明此时施肥对胸径生长有显著的差异影响。为此采用DUNCN检验法做了如上表的多重比较。从此表可以知道，A-复合肥对整个红豆杉的盖度都有明显的促进作用，其间的差异性不是很大。差异源离差平方和自由度均方Fp树高处理组合间0.95420.4771.9140.149误差66.5372670.249总数67.491269地径处理组合间3.23321.6165.1750.006误差83.3982670.312总数86.631269胸径处理组合间0.08920.0440.3780.686误差31.3582670.117总数31.447269冠幅处理组合间2448.55221224.2762.4450.089误差133685.190267500.694总数136133.742269BNalpha=0.05的子集12Duncana,b11201.533630301.601131.6011321201.76358显著性0.5090.113Waller-Duncana,b,c11201.533630301.6011321201.76358由处理组合间地径的方差分析结果，即上表可以看P=0.006<0.01,即各处理组合间的差异性达到极显著水平。说明此时施肥对地径生长有显著的差异影响。为此采用DUNCN检验法做了如上表的多重比较。从此表可以知道，对B-有机肥而言，处理组合0与其他处理组合的差异更为显著。列号试验号1-A2-B3-(空)4-(空)试验组合试验方案均值11-A11-B111A1B1复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.621-A12-B222A1B2复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.732-A21-B112A2B1复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.842-A22-B221A2B2复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.453-A31-B122A3B1复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.963-A32-B211A3B2复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.674-A41-B121A4B1复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.484-A42-B212A4B2复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.8k13.36.7k23.26.5k33.5k43.2x11.651.68x21.61.38x31.75x41.6R0.150.30优水平A3B1优组合A3B1列号试验号1-A2-B3-(空)4-(空)试验组合试验方案均值11-A11-B111A1B1复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.721-A12-B222A1B2复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.932-A21-B112A2B1复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.642-A22-B221A2B2复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.753-A31-B122A3B1复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.563-A32-B211A3B2复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.774-A41-B121A4B1复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株1.384-A42-B212A4B2复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株1.9k13.66.1k23.37.2k33.2k43.2x11.81.53x21.651.8x31.6x41.6R0.20.27优水平A1B2优组合A1B2列号试验号1-A2-B3-(空)4-(空)试验组合试验方案均值11-A11-B111A1B1复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株0.421-A12-B222A1B2复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株0.632-A21-B112A2B1复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株0.542-A22-B221A2B2复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株0.453-A31-B122A3B1复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株0.663-A32-B211A3B2复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株0.574-A41-B121A4B1复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株0.584-A42-B212A4B2复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株0.6k112k20.92.1k31.1k41.1x10.50.5x20.450.53x30.55x40.55R0.010.03优水平A3A4B2优组合A3B2A4B2列号试验号1-A2-B3-(空)4-(空)试验组合试验方案均值11-A11-B111A1B1复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株57.321-A12-B222A1B2复合肥0.0g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株77.632-A21-B112A2B1复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株54.342-A22-B221A2B2复合肥0.025g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株51.353-A31-B122A3B1复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株59.263-A32-B211A3B2复合肥0.050g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株62.474-A41-B121A4B1复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.0kg/株54.184-A42-B212A4B2复合肥0.100g/株+有机肥0.5kg/株58.4k1134.9224.9k2105.6249.7k3121.6k4