




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS1..2BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity3TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu4CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.5Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin6AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo7Results.Results.8..9..10..11..12..13Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf14StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.15WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie16DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia17TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized18Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa19pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'prä-",prO-',prä-'
Function:adjective
Date:circa1699
1
:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture
2a
:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b
:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:20“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC21DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year22WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci23TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(24SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV25WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin26RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.RecentlyPublishedStudiesfro27WhatMightExplainObservedRelationshipofTennisAbilitytoHeartDiseaseRisk?TennisprotectsagainstheartdiseaseMenwholiketoplaytennisaredifferentThinnerHealthierLifestylesHigherSocioeconomicStatusMenwhoplaytenniswellaredifferentTaller,ThinnerGreaterCardiovascularFitnessChance(typeIerror)–Needsconfirmation.WhatMightExplainObservedRe28PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellSustainedActivityThruMidlifeLoweradiposity,GreaterFitnessLowerBP,LowerLDL,HigherHDLLowerRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayHealthierMenChooseTennisHealthierMenPlayTennisWellPotentialConfounders.PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellS29GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayOlderAgePotentialConfounders.GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHyp30ChallengesinCohortStudiesPossiblylongdurationPossiblylargesamplesizeNeedtorecruitpeople“atrisk”Dropouts,Deaths,OtherlossesConcernaboutresidualconfoundingMultiplecomparisonsTypeIerror.ChallengesinCohortStudiesPo31HowtoExploitCohortDesignWhenTimeisShort&MoneyisScarceAnalyzeexistingdatafromanotherstudyPiggy-backontoon-goingstudyChoosehospital-basedcohortChooseshort-termoutcomeConsideradministrativedataConsiderpublic-usedataConsidernon-concurrentdesign.HowtoExploitCohortDesignW32..33..34FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS35..36BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity37TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu38CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.39Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin40AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo41Results.Results.42..43..44..45..46..47Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf48StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.49WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie50DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia51TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized52Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa53pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'prä-",prO-',prä-'
Function:adjective
Date:circa1699
1
:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture
2a
:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b
:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:54“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC55DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year56WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci57TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(58SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV59WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin60RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 吉县请销假管理办法
- 地下室工程管理办法
- 四安全研究管理办法
- 医学院招聘管理办法
- 打印店应急管理办法
- 勘测工程师管理办法
- 南阳市出行管理办法
- 外部劳务队管理办法
- 村集体自己管理办法
- 教育局私车管理办法
- 防火巡查记录表防火检查记录表
- 线条系列(会变的线条、雄伟的塔、茂密的花) 单元作业设计
- 新技术和新项目准入制度及要点解读
- 送达地址确认书样式
- 用电办理授权委托书(新)
- 手术物品清点课件
- 物理word版2023山东高考答题卡涂准考证号和条形码
- WS/T 512-2016医疗机构环境表面清洁与消毒管理规范
- GB/T 36089-2018丙烯腈-丁二烯橡胶(NBR)
- GB/T 26746-2011矿物棉喷涂绝热层
- 中耳疾病(分泌性中耳炎、急慢性中耳炎)
评论
0/150
提交评论