




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS1..2BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity3TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu4CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.5Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin6AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo7Results.Results.8..9..10..11..12..13Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf14StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.15WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie16DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia17TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized18Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa19pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'prä-",prO-',prä-'
Function:adjective
Date:circa1699
1
:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture
2a
:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b
:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:20“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC21DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year22WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci23TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(24SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV25WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin26RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.RecentlyPublishedStudiesfro27WhatMightExplainObservedRelationshipofTennisAbilitytoHeartDiseaseRisk?TennisprotectsagainstheartdiseaseMenwholiketoplaytennisaredifferentThinnerHealthierLifestylesHigherSocioeconomicStatusMenwhoplaytenniswellaredifferentTaller,ThinnerGreaterCardiovascularFitnessChance(typeIerror)–Needsconfirmation.WhatMightExplainObservedRe28PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellSustainedActivityThruMidlifeLoweradiposity,GreaterFitnessLowerBP,LowerLDL,HigherHDLLowerRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayHealthierMenChooseTennisHealthierMenPlayTennisWellPotentialConfounders.PlaysTennisPlaysTennisWellS29GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHypotheticalCausalPathwayOlderAgePotentialConfounders.GreyHairHigherRiskofCHDHyp30ChallengesinCohortStudiesPossiblylongdurationPossiblylargesamplesizeNeedtorecruitpeople“atrisk”Dropouts,Deaths,OtherlossesConcernaboutresidualconfoundingMultiplecomparisonsTypeIerror.ChallengesinCohortStudiesPo31HowtoExploitCohortDesignWhenTimeisShort&MoneyisScarceAnalyzeexistingdatafromanotherstudyPiggy-backontoon-goingstudyChoosehospital-basedcohortChooseshort-termoutcomeConsideradministrativedataConsiderpublic-usedataConsidernon-concurrentdesign.HowtoExploitCohortDesignW32..33..34FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHSProfessorofMedicine&EpidemiologyDirector,DivisionofGeneralInternalMedicineOslerJournalClub2006VisitHopkinsGIMat/gimProspectiveCohortStudies.FrederickL.Brancati,MD,MHS35..36BackgroundPhysicalactivitylowerCVDriskDHHSrecommendslife-longpursuitsSportsdifferinsustainabilityCVDbenefitsofindividualsportsuncertain.BackgroundPhysicalactivity37TheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyOver1300students(mainlywhitemen)fromtheJHUSOMClassesof1948-64.Baselinedatacollectedinpersoninmedicalschool.Follow-updatacollectedbyyearlymailedquestionnairesthereafter..TheJohnsHopkinsPrecu38CarolineThomas,MDTheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudy.CarolineThomas,MD.39Hypothesis:TennisabilityinyouthpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageDesign:ProspectivecohortstudySetting:JohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyParticipants:1019malemedicalstudentsDataCollection:Extensiveinterviewandphysicalassessmentatbaseline(early20s);annualmailedfollow-upquestionnairesOutcome:IncidentCVD,includingMI,CHD,CABGorPTCA,hypertensiveheartdisease,heartfailure,&cerebrovasculardiseaseAnalysis:Kaplan-Meier,CoxmodelsOutline.Hypothesis:Tennisabilityin40AssessmentofSportsAbilityHowwouldyourateyouroverallabilityintennis(golf,football,baseball,basketball)duringandbeforemedicalschool?NoabilityPoororfairabilityGoodorexcellentabilityNodataonfrequency,intensity,orsubsequentparticipation.AssessmentofSportsAbilityHo41Results.Results.42..43..44..45..46..47Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf-describedtennisabilityinyoungadulthoodpredictslowerCVDriskinmiddleageAssociationoftennistolowerriskisGraded(i.e.dose-response)IndependentofmanypossibleconfoundersSpecifictotennis(ashypothesized)SuggestspromotionoftennisasameanstoreduceCVDrisk.Conclusions/ImplicationsSelf48StrengthsProspectivedesignLong-termfollow-upMultiavariateanalysisBlindedassessmentofCVD.StrengthsProspectivedesign.49WeaknessesObservationalstudiescan’tprovecausalityResidualconfoundingislikelyAssessmentofexposurewassuboptimalAbility,notactivitySinglepoint,notrepeatedmeasuresSelf-assessed,notobjectiveSamplelimitsgeneralizability.WeaknessesObservationalstudie50DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecialaboutacohortstudy?Whatarecommonobstacles?Canitbeusedforhousestaffresearch?Caniteverbesufficienttochangepractice?Howdocohortstudiesrelatetooutcomesresearch?.DiscussionPointsWhat’sspecia51TaxonomyofDesignsRandomizedControlledTrialProspectiveCohortStudyCase-ControlStudyCross-SectionalStudyOtherDesignsQuasi-ExperimentalEcologicCaseReport.TaxonomyofDesignsRandomized52Thebasicfightingunitwasacohort,composedofsixcenturies(480menplus6centurions).Thelegionitselfwascomposedoftencohorts,andthefirstcohorthadmanyextramen—theclerks,engineers,andotherspecialistswhodidnotusuallyfight—andtheseniorcenturionofthelegion,theprimipilus,or“numberonejavelin.”.Thebasicfightingunitwasa53pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:pr&-'spek-tivalso'prä-",prO-',prä-'
Function:adjective
Date:circa1699
1
:relatingtooreffectiveinthefuture
2a
:likelytocomeabout:EXPECTED<theprospectivebenefitsofthislaw>b
:likelytobeorbecome<aprospectivemother>.pro·spec·tive
Pronunciation:54“Prospective”inEpidemiologyClearlydefinedcohort(group,sample)ofpersonsatriskfollowedthroughtimeDataregardingexposures(riskfactors,predictors)collectedpriortodataonoutcomes(endpoints)Research-gradedatacollectionmethodsusedforpurposeoftestinghypothesis(?).“Prospective”inEpidemiologyC55DiagramofHypothetical6-YearCohortStudytoIdentifyRiskFactorsforFacialAcneinTeenagers100012-year-oldswithoutacne50018-year-oldswithoutacne90015-year-oldswithoutacne50withAcne300withAcne5moved10noanswer35refused10moved40noanswer48refused2deaths350incidentcasesofacneover6years6-yrFollow-upRate=850/1000=85%IncidenceRateofAcne=350/5475PY=63.9per1000PY.DiagramofHypothetical6-Year56WhyDoACohortStudy?GetincidencedataStudyarangeofpossibleriskfactorsEstablishtemporalsequenceGetrepresentativedataPrepareforrandomizedcontrolledtrialEstablisharesearchempire.WhyDoACohortStudy?Getinci57TypesofCohortsOccupational(e.g.Asbestosworkers)Convenience(e.g.Precursors,Nurses)Geographic(e.g.Framingham,ARIC)DiseaseorProcedureNaturalHistory(e.g.Syncope,Lupus)OutcomesResearch(e.g.Dialysis,Cataracts).TypesofCohortsOccupational(58SourcesofCohortDataClinicVisitsLaboratoryAssaysInterviewPhysicalExaminationImagingPhysiologictestsHomevisitsMailedmaterialsTelephoneInterviewMedicalRecordsAdministrativeDataMedicareMedicaidManagedCareVeteransAdminBirthRecordsDeathCertificatesSpecimenBank.SourcesofCohortDataClinicV59WilliamCastelli,MDTheFraminghamHeartStudy.WilliamCastelli,MDTheFramin60RecentlyPublishedStudiesfromtheJohnsHopkinsPrecursorsStudyCoronaryDisease -Anger,Depression,Gout,-SportsAbilityType2Diabetes -Bloodpressure,AdiposityHypertension -CoffeeKneeOsteoarthritis -KneeinjuryDepression -InsomniaOutcomeExposure.
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 农村公路养护与农村经济发展的协同效应
- 智算中心产业园项目规划设计方案
- 消防应急响应与处理措施
- 现代农业示范区建设项目初步设计
- 天然气输气管道工程初步设计
- 2025年度渔船租赁与海洋科研实验合同
- 二零二五年度国际货运代理合同补充条款11
- 2025年度旅游度假村开发经营合同
- 三乙胺改建项目可行性研究报告
- 二零二五版数据中心水电供应及管理承包合同
- 实体档案移交方案(3篇)
- 2025年福建省中考数学试卷及答案
- 光伏系统的成本控制与经济性分析
- 风电场运行人员配置方案及费用
- 中国苍术行业市场深度评估及投资策略咨询报告
- 2025-2030年中国全自动建筑机器人行业市场现状供需分析及投资评估规划分析研究报告
- 2026版步步高大一轮高考数学复习讲义第四章 §4.8 正弦定理、余弦定理含答案
- 2025年中国电气设计行业市场前景预测及投资价值评估分析报告
- 法律工作者考试题及答案
- 专题8导数与不等式的证明(学生版)
- 共享电动项目计划书怎么写
评论
0/150
提交评论