




下载本文档
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
MarketEfficiency&BehavioralFinance
MSClass3
Yu-JaneLiuMarch8,2011ThreestagesofMarketEfficiencyTestofEMHAnomaliesDebatesApplication:StrategiesMethodologiesIssuesMarketEfficiencyPart1I.ThreeStages
Stage1:Randomwalk
Grossman-Stiglitzparadox
Ifallrelevantinformationwerereflectedinmarketprices,marketagentswouldhavenoincentivetoacquiretheinformationonwhichpricesarebased.JosephStiglitzhisNobelprizein2001Stage2:TestsofMarketEfficiencyafter1975
RozeffandKinneyfoundthatJanuarystockreturnswerehigherthaninanyothermonth.GibbonsandHessreported"theMondayeffect"-stockpricestendedtogodownonMondays.Bothofthesefindingswereclearlyinconsistentwiththeweakformofmarketefficiency.GibbonsandHessnoticedthattheMondayeffectseemedtodecreaseovertime.
(theeffectwasknowntosomemarketparticipants).Stage3:MarketAnomaliesby1985Whilethemarketdidreacttoearningssurprisesquickly,thepricesalsodriftedinthedirectionoftheearningssurprisefollowingtheannouncement.Shiller:priceschangetoomuchtobejustifiedbysubsequentchangesindividends."excessvolatility".DeBondtandThaler:thestockmarkettendstooverreacttolongseriesofbadnews.II.TestsonEfficientMarketsHypothesis
Anefficientmarketisonewherepricesfullyreflectallinformationquicklyandaccurately.
RandomWalkHypothesis(RWH)TheEMHevolvedfromtheRandomWalkHypothesis(RWH).Stockpricesarerandomandthereforesomehowuncausedorirrational.Ifpricesreflectinformationquicklyandaccurately,thentheonlyinformationthatwillcausepricestochangesignificantlyisinformationthatisnotalreadyknownaboutandreflectedintheprice.Ifnewinformation,whicharrivesrandomly,isquicklyandaccuratelyreflectedinstockprices,thenstockpricesmustalsochangerandomly.IftheRWHiscorrect,thenthenotionthatpricesmoveintrends,whichcanbedetectedinchartsbytechnicalanalysis,ishighlysuspect.WeakformtestsoftheEMHTestsoftheRWHarecalledweakformtestsoftheEMHTheinformationtestedforexcessreturnsinweakformtests(andtheRWH)ismarketdataWeak-forminefficientpossibletobeatthemarketNoreputableacademicstudycandemonstratetheexistenceofexcessreturnbytradingonthebasisofhistoricalpriceandvolumedata.howeverallofthelargebrokeragefirmshirestafftechnicalanalystswhodispensetechnicaladvice.WeakformefficientTechnicalanalysis,whichreliessolelyonmarketdata,isnotuseful.Market-timingschemesshouldnotwork.Thereareanynumberofnewslettersandfinancialproductsthatclaimphenomenalexcessreturnsbeinginthemarketwhenitisgoingupandoutofthemarketwhenitisgoingdown.Withperfecttiming,largereturnsareapparentlywithinreach.Unfortunately,theevidencesuggeststhatmarkettimingdoesnotworkinapracticalsense.Problem:ifyoulookat,tenyearsofmarketdata,thevastmajorityofthetotalreturnwillcomeinonly4or5months,usuallywhenitisleastexpected.Ifyourforecastingmodelmissesevenoneortwooftheturningpoints,youveryquicklyfallbehindasimpleindexingstrategy.Semi-strongformoftheEMHMarketpricesfullyreflectallpubliclyavailableinformation.Effortstolocateundervaluedandovervaluedsecuritiesbyusingfundamentalanalysiswillnotbeprofitable.0+t-tAnnouncementDatePriceEfficientreactionOverreactionUnderreactionPricesaroundAnnouncementDateunderEMHTheeventthataffectsafirm'svaluationmaybe:1)Corpevent,theannouncementofastocksplit.2)Macroeconomicannouncement,affectthefirm'sfutureoperations
insomeway.Variouseventshavebeenexamined:mergersandacquisitionsearningsannouncementsissuesofnewdebtandequityannouncementsofmacroeconomicvariablesIPO’sdividendannouncements.etc.
Somestudiesshowthatmarketisverygoodatanticipatingandquicklyreflectingpedestrianinformationsuchasearnings,dividends,splits,mergers,etc.Ontheotherhand,thereissomeevidencethatthemarketisnottheperfectlyfunctioningmechanismsuggestedbythetheory.Cleverresearchdesigns#Stockpricereactiontoexecutivedeaths
[Johnson-Magee-Nagarajan-Newman
(1985)]Stockpricesexperienceastatisticallysignificant3.5%
increasewhenafirm’sfounderdiesunexpectedlywhileholdingatop-levelexecutive
position.Incontrast,whennon-founderseniorexecutivedeathsoccur,stockprices
fallastatisticallyinsignificant1%.Reason1:thefounderswerenotoperatingthefirm
intheshareholders’interests.Reason2:thefounder’sdeathreveals
anincreasedprobabilityoftakeover.However,theevidencesuggeststhat
takeoverexpectationsarenotresponsibleforthepositiveabnormalreturnsatthetime
ofthefounder’sdeath.theabilitytocreateabusinessisdifferentfromtheabilitytorunone.#EarningsSurprisesRendelman,Jones,andLatané(1982)studiedearningssurprisesandtheireffectonthestockprice.Theydividedtheirsampleintotengroups(deciles)accordingtohowpositiveornegativetheearningssurprisewas.Thentheycalculatedaveragedpricepathsforstocksineachdecile.Figure2presentsasummaryoftheirfindings.StrongformoftheEMHThemarketisefficientwithrespecttoallinformation,eventhatinformationthatisnotpubliclyavailable.Corporateinsidersseemtobeabletouseinsideinformationtoearnexcessreturns.Professionalmoneymanagers,suchasmutualfundandinstitutionalmanagers,seemunabletoconsistentlyoutperformthemarketaverages.Market
AnomaliesPart2TheevidencecontrarytotheEMH
Calendarpatterns-JanuaryeffectSmallfirmeffectP/E(P/B)effectOverreaction/underreactionCross-sectionalreturnpredictability
1.Calendarpatterns
Atparticularmomentsoftimesuchasthebeginningoftheweekortheturnofthemonth,stockreturnsreachabnormallevelsrecurrently.
Forinstance,thetendencyofcommonstockreturnsforearlyJanuarytobeaboveaveragedoesnotoccurmerelybychance.Itseemsthatbothinstitutionalfactors,amongwhichtheend-of-yearcashinfusionsintothemarket(Ogden,1990),andbehavioralconsiderationsaffecttradingbyindividualinvestors(cf.Sias&Starks,1997).
JanuaryeffectIthasbeenfoundthatstocksseemtodoconsistentlybetterinJanuarythanothermonths.onlyforsmallstocksTax-losssellingbyinvestorsattheendofDecember.Individualinvestorssellpoor-performingstockstorealizelossesfortaxpurposesBuyingpressureinearlyJanuaryresultsinadisproportionatesmall-firmpremium(see,e.g.,Roll,1983).Thisisnottosaythatinvestorsshouldwaituntiltheendoftheyeartorealizelosses(cf.Constantinides,1984)But,rather,thatindividualinvestorstypicallyhaveadispositiontoholdontopoor-performingstocks(Ferris,Haugen,&Makhija,1988.Ritter(1988):individualinvestorsdonotimmediatelyreinvestalloftheproceedsfromearliersalesinDecember.Hefindsthattheratioofstockpurchasestosalesbyindividualinvestorsdisplaysaseasonalpattern,withindividualshavinga
below-normalbuy/sellratioinlateDecember,whichabruptlyswitchestoanabove-normalratioinearlyJanuary.Forthatmatter,whenindividualsreinvesttheirfunds,theytypicallybuylow-pricedandlow-marketcapitalizationstocks,justastheydothroughouttheyear.Inducedbyperiodicevaluation,professionalmanagersmostlikelyrebalancetheirportfoliospriortoyear-endtoremoveembarrassment-causinglosers,whichoftenaresmall,riskystocks(cf.Haugen&Lakonishok,1988;Ritter&Chopra,1989).Then,attheturnoftheyear,ashiftofportfolioallocationstomoreaggressivestocksgeneratespricepressure,irrespectiveofwhetherthemarketisupordown2.SmallfirmeffectSmallfirmsseemtohavebeenabletoconsistentlyoutperformlargefirms,evenadjustedforrisk,from1926untilrecenttimes.Widelyknowninthe1980stherewasanimmediateproliferationofmoneymanagersandmutualfundsspecializinginsmallfirms.Result:Returnsonsmallfirmshavegenerallylaggedbigfirmsoverthelast10years-surprise!
3.P/E&P/BeffectLowP/EstockstendtodoslightlybetterthanthemarketinsubsequentperiodsandhighP/Estockstendtodoslightlyworse.Stockswithlowratiosofmarketpricepersharetobookvaluepershare(P/B)tendtodobetterinsubsequentperiodsthanstockswithhighmarket/bookratios.LowP/E(P/B)stocksgotthatwaybecausethemarketoverreacted
tosomenegativeinformation.4.OverreactionandUnderreationPersistenceofstrongormerelyweakreturnsisindicativeofaslowreactiontonewsAnunder-reactionatthemomentofitsrelease,whereasareturnreversaloracontrarymovementsuggestsanoverreactionthatissubsequentlycorrected.Theonesassociatedwithidentifiablenewsevents.Theinformationcontentofthenewscanbeinferredandalsothespeedofprocessing,thatishowmuchtimepricestaketoreflectfullyandcompletelythearrivedinformationifthereisundershootingorovershooting.#Anannouncementofacorporateeventquarterlyearnings
(e.g.,Bernard&Thomas,1990)seasonedequityoffering
(e.g.,Loughran&Ritter,1997,II:11)openmarketshare
repurchase
(e.g.,Ikenberryetal.,1995,II:12)stocksplit
(e.g.,Ikenberryetal.,1996,II:13)initiationoromissionofcashdividendpayments
(e.g.,Michaelyetal.,1995,II:14).Apredictablepost-announcementlong-runreturnsdriftinthesamedirectionastheinitialreturnsresponseisfoundthefulleconomicimpactofnewpubliccorporatefactsislargelyignoredorunder-weightedbyinvestorsintheshortrun.
strongespeciallyforout-of-favorstocks,whichtendtohavehighbook-to-marketratios.5.Cross-sectionalreturnpredictabilityParticularstocksearnpredictablehugeabnormalreturnsonaregularbasisPricesseemtobeinefficientinthesensethattheydonotfullyincorporatepastinformationavailableAprofitableinvestmentstrategycanbeimplemented.variablessuchaspriorreturnperformance,book-to-marketvalueandmarketcapitalizationdonot(sufficiently)pickupvariationinrisk.
PlausiblereasonsAfactormodelimpliesapositionofrisk.Anexampleofafactoristhemarket(return),whichcaptureseconomy-wideinfluences.Unexpectedchangeshaveanimpactonallreturns,beingstrongforsomestocksandonlyweakforsomeotherones,asexpressedbythemarketbeta.Empiricalresearchshowsthatmostfactorssufferfrommeasurementerrorandlongpublicationlags,andthattheestimatedfactorbetasoftenarenon-stationaryovertime.
DebatesbwMktEfficiencyandAnomaliesPart3I.JointtestThereisnowaytotestmarketefficiencyperse.WecanonlytestajointhypothesisWeknowwhattheintrinsicvaluesare;i.e.,wehaveaperfectassetpricingmodel.
Wheneverananomalyisfound,wedon'tknow(andhavenowayofknowing)whichpartofthisjointhypothesisdidnotwork.IIMarketmicrostructureeffects
Jensen
arguedthatanefficientmarketshouldadjustpriceswithinlimitsimposedbythecostoftrading.Ifinefficiencycannotbeexploitedforprofitnetofcosts,isthemarketreallyinefficient?Whatistheleveloftransactionalcostsatwhichwecannolongercallamarketefficientinspiteofitsbeingwithintheboundsofefficiency?Theremayalsobesomeeffectscausedbythewaysecuritypricesarereported.Atypicalresearchassumptionhasbeenthattradescanbeexecutedattheclosingpriceasrecordedbyadataprovider.III.Short-sellingissueInanefficientmarket,shortsalesareunrestricted.Inreality,70%ofmutualfundsstateintheirprospectusthattheywillneverengageinashortsale.Finn,FullerandKling:suggestthat,whileundervaluedinvestmentsarehardtocomeby,overvaluedonesaremuchmorecommon.
IV.InvestorheterogeneityOneobviousexampleistaxstatus.Tax-exempt,tax-deferred,andtaxableinvestors.Whatthenshouldtheinvestordo?IsFama-stylerationalprofitmaximizationthebest?Ifitisnot,whatelseisthere,andwhatdoesthatmeanforunderstandinghowinvestorsact?#dividendpuzzleInaperfectworldaccordingtoModiglianiandMiller,investorsshouldbeindifferentbetweendividendsandcapitalgains.Intherealworld,becauseofthestructureoftheU.S.taxsystem,rationalinvestorsshouldprefercapitalgainstodividends,andcompaniesshouldprefersharerepurchasestodividends.Mostlargecompaniesdopaydividends.Inaddition,stockpricestendtorisewhendividendsareincreasedorinitiated.V.BehavioralExplanationsMCI:Acompanywhosetickersymbolis‘MCI’andwhosepricegoesupanddownwiththe‘real’MCICeventhoughtheyarecompletelyunrelated(Rashes,M.S.(2001),‘MassivelyConfusedInvestorsMakingConspicuouslyIgnorantChoices(MCI-MCIC)’.)MomentumorP/EstrategiesinthestockmarketInternetstocksandthewholeUSmarketareovervalued#ApuzzleoftradingvolumeIfeveryoneknowsthateveryone(includinghimselforherself)isrational,theneverytradermightwonderwhatinformationthesellerhasthatthebuyerdoesn't,andviceversa.#.equitypremiumHistorically,thisbenefithasbeenmuchgreaterthancanbeexplainedbyriskalone.Futurereturnscan,atleastpartially,bepredictedas:price-earningsandprice-to-bookratios,earningssurprises,dividendchanges,orsharerepurchases.
Real-worldportfoliomanagersarestillhavingahardtimetryingtobeatthemarket.Goodperformancethisyearconsistentlyfailstopredictgoodperformancenextyear.#Criticsofbehavioralfinance:
EugeneFamaBehavioralfinanceismoreacollectionofanomaliesthanatruebranchoffinance.Theseanomalieswilleventuallybepricedoutofthemarketorexplainedbyappealtomarketmicrostructurearguments.However,adistinctionshouldbenotedbetweenindividualbiasesandsocialbiases.Theformercanbeaveragedoutbythemarket,whiletheothercancreatefeedbackloopsthatdrivethemarketfurtherandfurtherfromtheequilibriumofthe"fairprice".#CriticismsfromSteveRossTheyare‘small’Small$(e.g.,MCIJr.vs.MCI)Notscalable,e.g.,illiquidStatisticallysuspectVolatilityTestsFleeting(稍縱即逝)E.g.,thesmallstockpremium,seeSchwert[2000]NonprofitopportunitiesBid/AskspreadsInformationcosts,e.g.,complexmortgageinstruments#Howaboutthree-factormodel?Thebehaviorofstockpricesinrelationtobook-to-marketvalueandmarketcapitalizationisconsistentwiththebehaviorofearnings.Thestrongreturnsonhighbook-to-marketandsmallmarketcapitalizationstocksasarationalpremiumforrelativedistress(versusrelativestrength)thatapparentlyisrelatedtobusinessconditions.Thethree-factorrisk-returnrelationalsoabsorbsthecross-sectionalreturnsvariationrelatedtoothervaluemeasures,viz.earnings-to-price,cashflowtoprice,anddividendyield,aswellassalesgrowthandlong-termpastreturns.Conclusionitisverydifficulttoconsistentlyearnexcessreturnsbytradingonthebasisofpubliclyavailableinformation.Thoseanomaliesthathavebeenidentifiedinacademicstudiesdonotseemtobeconsistentlyexploitableinapracticalsense.Themarketissemi-strongefficientinapracticalexcessreturnsense.Applications:TradingstrategiesandDetectAnomaliesPart4ActiveandPassiveStrategiesWhethertheinvestorshouldfollowabuyandholdstrategyorattempttotimethemarketbyusingsomesortofeconomic,fundamental,ortechnicalanalysis.Whethertheinvestorshouldattempttoearnexcessreturnsbyactivelymanagingthesecurityselectionprocess.ActiveStrategiesInvolvesperiodicchangestoaportfolioinanticipationofpricemovements.Anactivelymanagedstockportfoliomightswitchitsholdingsfromgrowthstockstowardcyclicalstocksinanticipationofaneconomicexpansion.Suchaproceduregeneratesadditionalcosts,intheformofcommissions,inordertochangefromonetypeofstocktoanother.Themanagersofactivelymanagedportfoliosusuallyrelyontechnicalanalysis,fundamentalanalysis,orsomecombinationtoguidetheirportfoliochanges.Marketefficiencycastsdoubtonthepossibilitythatactivelymanagedportfolioscanconsistentlyproducesuperiorreturnsoverapassivelymanagedone.Activemanagementmustprofitenoughtopaythehighertransactionscostsassociatedwithmorefrequentbuyingandselling.IndexedportfoliosAnalternativetoactivemanagementDesignedtomimictheperformanceofsometargetindex,suchastheS&P500,Russell2,000ortheMerrillLynchCorporateMasterBondIndex.ImplicitacknowledgmentofthetruthoftheEMH.Inessence,activemanagementwon'tworkoristooexpensiveorrisky,andthatthesmartthingtodoistochoosetheno-brainerapproachofbuyingandholdinganindexfund.VI.MethodologyIssues:DissectingAnomalies
EUGENEF.FAMAandKENNETHR.FRENCH∗JF(2008)Previousworkfindsthatnetstockissues,accruals,momentum,profitability,
andassetgrowthareassociatedwith
anomalousaveragereturns.Weexplore
thepervasivenessofthesereturnanomaliesviasortsandcross-sectionregressions
estimatedseparatelyonmicrocaps,smallstocks,andbigstocks.Averagereturnsassociatedwithnetstockissues,accruals,profitability,and
assetgrowth,returnmomentumisleftunexplainedbythethree-factormodel
ofFamaandFrench(1993)aswellasbytheCAPM.Werevisitthesize,value,profitability,growth,accruals,netstockissues,
andmomentumanomalies.Eachpresentsapathtraveledbyearlierwork,but
therearegainsinstudyingthemtogethertoseewhichhaveinformationabout
averagereturnsthatismissedbytheothers.Approachesusedto
identifyanomalies(i)sortsofreturnsonanomalyvariables(ii)regressionsthatuseanomalyvariables
toexplainthecross-sectionofaveragereturns.ModelsforExpectedReturnsCAPME[Ri;t|Xt]–rf,t=βi(E[Rm,t|Xt]–rf,t),FamaandFrench(1993)(FF)3factormodelE[Ri;t|Xt]-rf,t=ai+b1i(E[Rm|Xt]-rf)t+b2iSMLt+b3iHMLt
SML:returnsonsmall(Size)portfoliominusreturnsonbigportfolio HML:returnsonhigh(B/M)portfoliominusreturnsonlowportfolio
Note:Morefactorscanbeeasilyaddedtothisad-hocmodel,forexample,amomentumfactor–see,Carhart(1997).
Sorts
Supposethattherearetwofactorsthataffectreturns:Sizeand(B/M).
Wedonotknowwhetherthereisastableorlinearrelationshipastheonespecifiedin
theFFmodel.
Howtodo?-Sortallreturnsinto10decilesaccordingtosize.-Conditionalonsize,sortreturnsintotendecilesaccordingtoBM.(Thisgivesus100portfolios.)Computetheaveragereturnofthe100portfoliosforeachperiod.Thisgivesustheexpectedreturnsofstocksgiventhecharacteristics.-Foreachstockintheeventstudy: 1)Findinwhatsizedeciletheybelong. 2)Then,findinwhatB/Mdeciletheybelong. 3)Comparethereturnofthestocktothecorrespondingportfolio return. 4)Deviationsarecalled“abnormal”return.
Fact:Sortsgivemoreconservativeresults.IfweusetheFFmethod,wetendtofindhugeabnormalreturns,whilewiththesorts,wedonot.Note:-ResultschangeifwesortfirstbyB/Mandthensize(notgood).-Resultschangeifwesortaccordingtoothercharacteristics.Themainadvantageofsorts:asimplepictureofhowaveragereturnsvary
acrossthespectrumofananomalyvariable.acommonapproachistoformequal-weight(EW)decile
portfoliosbysortingstocksonthevariableofinterest.itiscommontofocusonthehedgeportfolio
returnobtainedfromlong-shortpositionsintheextremedeciles.Apotential
problemthereturnsonEWhedgeportfoliosthatuseallstockscan
bedominatedbystocksthataretiny(microcaps,withmarketcapbelowthe20thNYSEpercentile.Microcaps
canbeinfluentialinEWhedgeportfolioreturnsfortworeasons.First,though
microcapsareonaverageonlyabout3%ofthemarketcapoftheNYSE-Amex-
NASDAQuniverse,theyaccountforabout60%ofthetotalnumberofstocks.
thecross-sectiondispersionofanomalyvariablesislargestamongmicrocaps,
sotheytypicallyaccountformorethan60%ofthestocksinextreme
sortportfolios.Tocircumventthisproblemvalue-weight(VW)hedgeportfolio
returnsareoftenshownalongwithEWreturns.ButVWhedgereturnscanbe
dominatedbyafewbigstocks,resultingagaininanunrepresentativepicture
oftheimportanceoftheanomaly.Toattacktheseproblems,weexaminetheaveragereturnsfromseparatesorts
ofmicrocaps,smallstocks,andbigstocksoneachanomalyvariablewherethe
breakpointsseparatingmicrofromsmallandsmallfrombigarethe20thand
50thpercentilesofmarketcapforNYSEstocks.SortshavetwoingsSortsareawkwardfordrawinginferencesaboutwhichanomalyvariableshaveuniqueinformationaboutaveragereturns.Multipleregressionslopesprovidedirectestimatesofmarginaleffects.Moreover,withourlargesamples,marginaleffectsaremeasuredpreciselyformanyexplanatoryvariables.diagnosticsontheregressionresidualsallowustojudgewhethertherelationsbetweenanomalyvariablesandaveragereturnsimpliedbytheregressionslopesshowupacrossthefullrangesofthevariables.regressionapproachfacespotentialproblemsregressionsestimated
onallstockscanbedominatedbymicrocapsbecausetheyaresoplentifulbecausemicrotendtohavemore
extremevaluesoftheexplanatoryvariables
andmoreextremereturns.Weavoidthisproblembyestimatingseparate
regressionsformicrocaps,smallstocks,andbigstocks,aswellasforasample
thatincludesall-but-microcapstocks.Differenceofmeanstestsontheaverage
slopesfromtheregressionsfordifferentsizegroupsthenprovideformalinferences.thereturnsonindividual
stockscanbeextreme--thepotentialforinfluentialobservationproblemsinFMregressions.Thesortsprovideacross-check.Iftheregressionsandthe
sortssuggestcontradictoryinferences,influentialobservationproblemsin
theregressionsarealikelyculprit.Thepervasivenessofanomalyreturnsacrosssizegroups,whichweaddress
withbothsortsandcross-sectionregressions,isanimportantissue.iftheextremereturns
associatedwithananomalyvariable
arespecialtomicrocaps,theyareprobablynotrealizablebecauseofthe
highcostsoftradingsuchstocks.itis
importanttoknowwhetheranomalouspatternsinreturnsare
marketwideor
limitedtoilliquidstocksthatrepresentasmallportionofmarketwealth.Procedures1.examinesabnormal
returns(averagereturnsadjustedfortheeffectsofsizeandbook-to-market
equity)fromsortsofstocksontheanomalyvariables.2.presentsthecross-sectionregressions
toidentifywhichvariables
have
informationaboutaveragereturnsmissedbytherest.ResultsTheanomalousreturnsassociatedwithnetstockissues,accruals,andmomentum
arepervasive.Theyshowupinallsizegroups(micro,small,andbig)incross-section
regressions,andtheyarealsostronginsorts,atleastintheextremes.Theasset
growthandprofitabilityanomaliesarelessrobust.Thereisanassetgrowthanomaly
inaveragereturnsonmicrocapsandsmallstocks,butitisabsentforbigstocks.Amongprofitablefirms,higherprofitabilitytendstobeassociatedwithabnormally
highreturns,butthereislittleevidencethatunprofitablefirmshaveunusuallylowreturn.Theregressionssaythatthesizeeffectowesmuchofitspowertomicrocapsandismarginalamongsmall
andbigstocks.Therelationbetweenmomentumandaveragereturnsissimilarforsmallandbigstocks,butonlyabouthalfasstrongamongmicrocaps.Thenegativerelationbetween
averagereturnsandassetgrowthispowerfulamongmicrocaps,weakerbut
statisticallyreliableamongsmallstocks,andprobablynonexistentamongbig
stocks.researcherscommonlyinterprettheaveragereturnsassociatedwith
anomalyvariablesasevidenceofmarketinefficiency.However,controllingforthebook-to-marketratio,proxiesforexpected
netcashflowswillidentifydifferencesinexpectedreturnswhethertheyaredue
toirrationalpricingorrationalrisks.Thus,evidencethatvariablesthatpredict
futurecashflowsalsopredictreturnsdoesnot,byitself,helpusdeterminehow
muchvariationin
expectedreturnsiscausedbyriskandhowmuchiscaused
bymispricing.AnIntroduction:BehavioralFinancePart51.Framing2.
如何签乐透?用小钱试运气,即使摃龟后的失望也不会让人绝望。乐透=娱乐?号码球根本没有记忆,过去的号码不会影响未来。
乐透迷想中大奖,应签热门号码,或是去签冷门号码?明牌迷思?每一次乐透开出的号码都是独立的,乐透迷想中大奖,但不
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 排查危房方案
- 转体桥施工改进方案
- 旧楼电线拆除方案
- 《肝衰竭诊治指南(2024年版)》解读 2
- 二零二五年特种设备安装与检测服务外包合同
- 2025年度合规合规建筑施工资质代办与审批合同
- 代理报关服务方案
- 2025版北京机场接送汽车租赁合同范本
- 2025版办公家具设计与安装一体化服务合同范本
- 2025版PVC管材绿色制造与购销合同
- 2023年纳雍县财政局系统事业单位招聘笔试题库及答案解析
- 2023年广东省普通高中学业水平考试及参考答案
- 建筑工程模板施工工艺技术要点讲义丰富课件
- 永能选煤厂生产安全事故应急救援预案
- 浙江省建设领域简易劳动合同(A4版本)
- 位置度公差以及其计算
- 城市规划原理课件(完整版)
- 氯化铵危险化学品安全周知卡
- 浙江省本级公务车辆租赁服务验收单(格式)
- 糖代谢紊乱的实验诊断
- 国家电网有限公司十八项电网重大反事故措施(修订版)
评论
0/150
提交评论