3种角度为你带来精品解析GRE阅读

3种角度为你带来精品解析GRE阅读如何战胜GRE阅读中的拦路虎?3种角度为你带来精品解析,我们来看看吧，下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。如何战胜GRE阅读中的拦路虎?3种角度为你带来精品解析在新GRE考试中，GRE阅读的难度明显增加，考生在备考及考试过程中，通常会遇到哪些障碍呢?都有什么办法可以解决呢?将为大家分析一下GRE阅读中常见的拦路虎及应对策略，希望对大家GRE备考有所帮助。障碍一：单词不认识严重的单词障碍使得阅读学习进展艰难，有时候虽然单词也背了几遍，但是看到阅读文章时仍是满眼生词，一头雾水，文章根本就读不下去。针对这种情况，可以在读阅读文章的时候试着忽略复杂专业名词的具体含义，因为有些专业名词很少见。虽然忽略掉，在做题的时候也会没有影响，例如一种叫rhinoviruses的病毒可以抽象为“R”病毒。另外，还可以积累一些单词。例如，阅读一篇文章过后，可以挑出一些你认为比较重要的词进行累积，后来你会发现进步是很大的。障碍二：句子读不懂有时候句子中的单词都认识，但是这个句子就是读不懂，不知道在讲什么，甚至连句子的主谓宾都找不到。这就说明GRE的长难句是一个问题。针对这种情况，需要对句子的结构有一个透彻的了解，其中句子中的几个难点是：修饰成分繁多，倒装，插入语，多重否定等，这是需要采用集中突破的方法。另外，还需要不畏惧困难，多对句子做一些分析和研究，找句子的主干，分析读不懂的原因。考场上基本上是要求16-17分钟做完阅读题的部分，而实际情况是现在的做题速度慢极了，根本达不到要求。这是多数考生会遇到的问题。其主要原因是花在读原文的时间太长了，所以读一篇文章要达到两个目的即可：1.主旨题和作者观点题要做对;2.关注、标记一些常考考点为定位使用。障碍三：文章读完没有印象读过文章之后什么也不记得，又重新认认真真地读完一篇，结果是后面看完了前面的也忘记，根本不知道文章在讲些什么。这其中是有一定的原因的，就是想要记住的太多，搞得什么也没记住。针对这种情况可以只记住比较重要的话，例如文章的主旨句，首段、每段首句，全文末句等，作者的态度等。还有一点就是平时需要积累哪些是需要记住的，哪些是不需要记住的。以上就是为大家整理的GRE阅读中常见的拦路虎及应对策略，相信大家结合自己的具体情况，用心准备，有针对性的复习提高，一定会战胜它们，抵达梦想的彼岸!GRE考试阅读理解模拟题及答案解析P1Itisapopularmisconceptionthatnuclearfusionpowerisfreeofradioactivity;infact,thedeuterium-tritiumreactionthatnuclearscientistsarecurrentlyexploringwithsuchzealproducesbothalphaparticlesandneutrons.(Theneutronsareusedtoproducetritiumfromalithiumblanketsurroundingthereactor.)Anothercommonmisconceptionisthatnuclearfusionpowerisavirtuallyunlimitedsourceofenergybecauseoftheenormousquantityofdeuteriuminthesea.Actually,itslimitsaresetbytheamountofavailablelithium,whichisaboutasplentifulasuraniumintheEarth‘scrust.Researchshouldcertainlycontinueoncontrollednuclearfusion,butnoenergyprogramshouldbepremisedonitsexistenceuntilithas(been)provenpractical.(122words)Itcanbeinferredfromthepassagethattheauthorbelieveswhichofthefollowingaboutthecurrentstateofpublicawarenessconcerningnuclearfusionpower?Thepublichasbeendeliberatelymisinformedabouttheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisunawareoftheprincipaladvantageofnuclearfusionovernuclearfussionasanenergysource.Thepublic‘sawarenessofthescientificfactsconcerningnuclearfusionpowerissomewhatdistortedandincomplete.Thepublicisnotinterestedinincreasingitsawarenessoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisawareofthedisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpowerbutnotofitsadvantages.Forthefollowingquestion,considereachofthechoicesseparatelyandselectallthatapplyThepassageprovidesinformationthatwouldanswerwhichofthefollowingquestionsEXCEPT?□AHowmuchincidentalradiationisproducedinthedeuteriumtritiumfusionreaction?□BWhatislikelytobetheprincipalsourceofdeuteriumfornuclearfusionpower?□CWhyarescientistsexploringthedeuterium-tritiumfusionreactionwithsuchzeal?P2RogerRosenblatt‘sbookBlackFiction,inattemptingtoapplyliteraryratherthansociopoliticalcriteriatoitssubject,successfullyalterstheapproachtakenbymostpreviousstudies.AsRosenblattnotes,criticismofBlackwritinghasoftenservedasapretextforexpoundingonBlackhistory.AddisonGayle‘srecentwork,forexample,judgesthevalueofBlackfictionbyovertlypoliticalstandards,ratingeachworkaccordingtothenotionsofBlackidentitywhichitpropounds.Althoughfictionassuredlyspringsfrompoliticalcircumstances,itsauthorsreacttothosecircumstancesinwaysotherthanideological,andtalkingaboutnovelsandstoriesprimarilyasinstrumentsofideologycircumventsmuchofthefictionalenterprise.Rosenblatt‘sliteraryanalysisdisclosesaffinitiesandconnectionsamongworksofBlackfictionwhichsolelypoliticalstudieshaveoverlookedorignored.WritingacceptablecriticismofBlackfiction,however,presupposesgivingsatisfactoryanswerstoanumberofquestions.Firstofall,isthereasufficientreason,otherthantheracialidentityoftheauthors,togrouptogetherworksbyBlackauthors?Second,howdoesBlackfictionmakeitselfdistinctfromothermodernfictionwithwhichitislargelycontemporaneous?RosenblattshowsthatBlackfictionconstitutesadistinctbodyofwritingthathasanidentifiable,coherentliterarytradition.LookingatnovelswrittenbyBlacksoverthelasteightyyears,hediscoversrecurringconcernsanddesignsindependentofchronology.Thesestructuresarethematic,andtheyspring,notsurprisingly,fromthecentralfactthattheBlackcharactersinthesenovelsexistinapredominantlyWhiteculture,whethertheytrytoconformtothatcultureorrebelagainstit.BlackFictiondoesleavesomeaestheticquestionsopen.Rosenblatt‘sthematicanalysispermitsconsiderableobjectivity;heevenexplicitlystatesthatitisnothisintentiontojudgethemeritofthevariousworks—yethisreluctanceseemsmisplaced,especiallysinceanattempttoappraisemighthaveledtointerestingresults.Forinstance,someofthenovelsappeartobestructurallydiffuse.Isthisadefect,oraretheauthorsworkingoutof,ortryingtoforge,adifferentkindofaesthetic?Inaddition,thestyleofsomeBlacknovels,likeJeanToomer‘sCane,vergesonexpressionismorsurrealism;doesthistechniqueprovideacounterpointtotheprevalentthemethatportraysthefateagainstwhichBlackheroesarepitted,athemeusuallyconveyedbymorenaturalisticmodesofexpression?Inspiteofsuchomissions,whatRosenblattdoesincludeinhisdiscussionmakesforanastuteandworthwhilestudy.BlackFictionsurveysawidevarietyofnovels,bringingtoourattentionintheprocesssomefascinatingandlittle-knownworkslikeJamesWeldonJohnson‘sAutobiographyofanEx-ColoredMan.Itsargumentistightlyconstructed,anditsforthright,lucidstyleexemplifieslevelheadedandpenetratingcriticism.TheauthorofthepassageobjectstocriticismofBlackfictionlikethatbyAddisonGaylebecauseitemphasizespurelyliteraryaspectsofsuchfictionmisinterpretstheideologicalcontentofsuchfictionmisunderstandsthenotionsofBlackidentitycontainedinsuchfictionsubstitutespoliticalforliterarycriteriainevaluatingsuchfictionignorestheinterplaybetweenBlackhistoryandBlackidentitydisplayedinsuchfictionTheauthorofthepassageisprimarilyconcernedwithevaluatingthesoundnessofaworkofcriticismcomparingvariouscriticalapproachestoasubjectdiscussingthelimitationsofaparticularkindofcriticismsummarizingthemajorpointsmadeinaworkofcriticismexplainingthetheoreticalbackgroundofacertainkindofcriticismTheauthorofthepassagebelievesthatBlackFictionwouldhavebeenimprovedhadRosenblattevaluatedmorecarefullytheideologicalandhistoricalaspectsofBlackfictionattemptedtobemoreobjectiveinhisapproachtonovelsandstoriesbyBlackauthorsexploredingreaterdetailtherecurrentthematicconcernsofBlackfictionthroughoutitshistoryestablishedabasisforplacingBlackfictionwithinitsownuniqueliterarytraditionassessedtherelativeliterarymeritofthenovelsheanalyzesthematicallyTheauthorofthepassagereferstoJamesWeldonJohnson‘sAutobiographyofanEx-ColoredManmostprobablyinordertopointoutaffinitiesbetweenRosenblatt‘smethodofthematicanalysisandearliercriticismclarifythepointaboutexpressionisticstylemadeearlierinthepassagequalifytheassessmentofRosenblatt‘sbookmadeinthefirstparagraphofthepassageillustratetheaffinitiesamongBlacknovelsdisclosedbyRosenblatt‘sliteraryanalysisgiveaspecificexampleofoneoftheaccomplishmentsofRosenblatt‘sworkP3Thetransferofheatandwatervaporfromtheoceantotheairaboveitdependsonadisequilibriumattheinterfaceofthewaterandtheair.Withinaboutamillimeterofthewater,airtemperatureisclosetothatofthesurfacewater,andtheairisnearlysaturatedwithwatervapor.Butthedifferences,howeversmall,arecrucial,andthedisequilibriumismaintainedbyairnearthesurfacemixingwithairhigherup,whichistypicallyappreciablycoolerandlowerinwater-vaporcontent.Theairismixedbymeansofturbulencethatdependsonthewindforitsenergy.Aswindspeedincreases,sodoesturbulence,andthustherateofheatandmoisturetransfer.Detailedunderstandingofthisphenomenonawaitsfurtherstudy.(127words)Forthefollowingquestion,considereachofthechoicesseparatelyandselectallthatapplyAccordingtothepassage,windovertheoceangenerallydoeswhichofthefollowing?□ACausesrelativelycool,dryairtocomeintoproximitywiththeoceansurface.□BMaintainsasteadyrateofheatandmoisturetransferbetweentheoceanandtheair.□CCausesfrequentchangesinthetemperatureofthewaterattheocean‘ssurface.Thepassagesuggeststhatifonacertaindaythewindweretodecreaseuntiltherewasnowindatallwhichofthefollowingwouldoccur?Theairclosesttotheoceansurfacewouldbecomesaturatedwithwatervapor.Theairclosesttotheoceansurfacewouldbewarmerthanthewater.Theamountofmoistureintheairclosesttotheoceansurfacewoulddecrease.Therateofheatandmoisturetransferwouldincrease.Theairclosesttotheoceanwouldbeatthesametemperatureasairhigherup.P4“Iwanttocriticizethesocialsystem,andtoshowitatwork,atitsmostintense.”VirginiaWoolf‘sprovocativestatementaboutherintentionsinwritingMrs.Dallowayhasregularlybeenignoredbythecritics,sinceithighlightsanaspectofherliteraryinterestsverydifferentfromthetraditionalpictureofthe“poeticno”velistconcernedwithexaminingstatesofreverieandvisionandwithfollowingtheintricatepathwaysofindividualconsciousness.ButVirginiaWoolfwasarealistaswellasapoeticnovelist,asatiristandsocialcriticaswellasavisionary:literarycritics‘cavalierdismissalofWoolf‘ssocialvisionwillnotwithstandscrutiny.Inhernovels,Woolfisdeeplyengagedbythequestionsofhowindividualsareshaped(ordeformed)bytheirsocialenvironments,howhistoricalforcesimpingeonpeople‘slives,howclass,wealth,andgenderhelptodeterminepeople‘sfates.Mostofhernovelsarerootedinarealisticallyrenderedsocialsettingandinaprecisehistoricaltime.(163words)Inthefirstparagraphofthepassage,theautho‘rsattitudetowardtheliterarycriticsmentionedcanbestbedescribedasdisparagingironicfacetiousskepticalbutresigneddisappointedbuthopefulItcanbeinferredfromthepassagethatthemostprobablereasonWoolfrealisticallydescribedthesocialsettinginthemajorityofhernovelswasthatshewasawarethatcontemporaryliterarycriticsconsideredthenoveltobethemostrealisticofliterarygenreswasinterestedintheeffectofaperson‘ssocialmilieuonhisorhercharacterandactionsneededtobeasattentivetodetailaspossibleinhernovelsinordertosupporttheargumentssheadvancedinthemwantedtoshowthatapainstakingfidelityintherepresentationofrealitydidnotinanywayhampertheartistwishedtopreventcriticsfromchargingthathernovelswerewritteninanambiguousandinexactstyleInthecontextofthepassage, “poetic”isclosestinmeaningtosocioeconomicrealisticpoliticalvisionaryliteraryP11Itisapopularmisconceptionthatnuclearfusionpowerisfreeofradioactivity;infact,thedeuterium-tritiumreactionthatnuclearscientistsarecurrentlyexploringwithsuchzealproducesbothalphaparticlesandneutrons.(Theneutronsareusedtoproducetritiumfromalithiumblanketsurroundingthereactor.)一个广为流传的误解，是核聚变能源不具备放射性;实际上，当下核科学的热门研究领域氘氚反应，会同时释放阿尔法粒子和中子。(中子来自于包裹核反应堆的锂层，用于制取氘)2Anothercommonmisconceptionisthatnuclearfusionpowerisavirtuallyunlimitedsourceofenergybecauseoftheenormousquantityofdeuteriuminthesea.核聚变能源取之不尽，这是另一个普遍的误解，理由是海洋中蕴含了不可计数量的氘。3Actually,itslimitsaresetbytheamountofavailablelithium,whichisaboutasplentifulasuraniumintheEarth‘scrust.其实，限制在于我们能获得多少锂，锂的含量大致与地壳中的铀含量相当。4Researchshouldcertainlycontinueoncontrollednuclearfusion,butnoenergyprogramshouldbepremisedonitsexistenceuntilithas(been)provenpractical.(122words)关于可控核聚变的研究当然该继续，但任何能源项目在证实可实际操作前，都不该仓促上马。(premise此句中做postulate假设“”解释。practical切合实际的，此句中可以意译地理解为“安全可行的”。比较直接的翻译是，……没有证明核能项目安全可行之前，任何项目都不该假设它存在我怀疑原文少了一个been，认为除非加上否则不通，虽然所有网上我查到的来源都没有这个been。如果你有更好的解释，或提出关于文本及翻译的其他错漏，请留言给我，愿一起努力打造一个质量更高的注释集。)1.Itcanbeinferredfromthepassagethattheauthorbelieveswhichofthefollowingaboutthecurrentstateofpublicawarenessconcerningnuclearfusionpower?Thepublichasbeendeliberatelymisinformedabouttheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisunawareoftheprincipaladvantageofnuclearfusionovernuclearfussionasanenergysource.Thepublic‘sawarenessofthescientificfactsconcerningnuclearfusionpowerissomewhatdistortedandincomplete.Thepublicisnotinterestedinincreasingitsawarenessoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpower.Thepublicisawareofthedisadvantagesofnuclearfusionpowerbutnotofitsadvantages.选CA实在看不出公众是故意去误解的，deliberately,不选；B“公众忽视了核聚变作为一种能源的主要优点”，文中只说两种误解，没说什么主要优点，不选；C正确项，公众关于核聚变能的一些科学事实的看法是扭曲和不完整的（误解）；D有没有interested或increasing，无从判断，不选；E啊，让人疲劳的瞎聊。Forthefollowingquestion,considereachofthechoicesseparatelyandselectallthatapply2.ThepassageprovidesinformationthatwouldanswerwhichofthefollowingquestionsEXCEPT?□AHowmuchincidentalradiationisproducedinthedeuteriumtritiumfusionreaction?□BWhatislikelytobetheprincipalsourceofdeuteriumfornuclearfusionpower?□CWhyarescientistsexploringthedeuterium-tritiumfusionreactionwithsuchzeal?选AC只有B项提出的问题可以用文中明确指出的信息回答，句 2，“海洋中的氘”。所以选AC。P21RogerRosenblatt‘sbookBlackFiction,inattemptingtoapplyliteraryratherthansociopoliticalcriteriatoitssubject,successfullyalterstheapproachtakenbymostpreviousstudies.RR的书《BF》，试图运用文学标准而不是社会政治的标准去评价它的研究对象，成功地改变了之前的研究方法。2AsRosenblattnotes,criticismofBlackwritinghasoftenservedasapretextforexpoundingonBlackhistory.R表示，许多所谓的关于黑人写作的评论，实际上关注的是黑人历史。（Black大写做形容词时，“黑人（人种）的”，可以指非洲黑人，或移居北美的非洲黑人及其后代组成的黑人群体。pretext借口，托词。对于黑人写作的评论，经常作为详述黑人历史的借口，意译一下，有些研究表面上是在讨论黑人写作，其实黑人写作只是幌子（借口，pretext），真正要探讨的问题是关于黑人历史的。）3AddisonGayle‘srecentwork,forexample,judgesthevalueofBlackfictionbyovertlypoliticalstandards,ratingeachworkaccordingtothenotionsofBlackidentitywhichitpropounds.比如说，AG最近的研究，用过度政治化的标准评判黑人小说的价值，根据每部作品所讨论的黑人身份概念来评价其价值。4Althoughfictionassuredlyspringsfrompoliticalcircumstances,itsauthorsreacttothosecircumstancesinwaysotherthanideological,andtalkingaboutnovelsandstoriesprimarilyasinstrumentsofideologycircumventsmuchofthefictionalenterprise.小说当然脱胎于政治环境，但作者回应环境却并非遵循意识形态化的方式，一旦讲述新奇故事成为意识形态宣传的工具，就制约了小说的发展。5Rosenblatt‘sliteraryanalysisdisclosesaffinitiesandconnectionsamongworksofBlackfictionwhichsolelypoliticalstudieshaveoverlookedorignored.R的文学分析解释了黑人小说作品间的相似与联系，单纯的政治研究往往忽略这些内容。6WritingacceptablecriticismofBlackfiction,however,presupposesgivingsatisfactoryanswerstoanumberofquestions.然而，想要写出令人满意的黑人小说评论，意味着针对一系列问题给出令人满意的答案。7Firstofall,isthereasufficientreason,otherthantheracialidentityoftheauthors,togrouptogetherworksbyBlackauthors?首先，抛开作者们相同的种族，有其他充分的理由将黑人小说归为一类吗?8Second,howdoesBlackfictionmakeitselfdistinctfromothermodernfictionwithwhichitislargelycontemporaneous?第二，相较于其他同时代的现代小说类型，黑人小说的独特之处是什么?9RosenblattshowsthatBlackfictionconstitutesadistinctbodyofwritingthathasanidentifiable,coherentliterarytradition.R展示了黑人小说所组成的一个特别的文学体系，该体系具有的一种可识别的，条理分明的文学传统。10LookingatnovelswrittenbyBlacksoverthelasteightyyears,hediscoversrecurringconcernsanddesignsindependentofchronology.仔细研究了过去80年的黑人小说，R发现了一些与年代无关的反复出现的关注点和设计。11Thesestructuresarethematic,andtheyspring,notsurprisingly,fromthecentralfactthattheBlackcharactersinthesenovelsexistinapredominantlyWhiteculture,whethertheytrytoconformtothatcultureorrebelagainstit.这些结构是关乎主题的，而且都不出人意料地，发端于这样一个核心事实，小说中的黑人角色都出现在一个白人主导的文化中，无论他们尝试适应这种文化或与之对抗。12BlackFictiondoesleavesomeaestheticquestionsopen.《BF》还有一些美学问题没有回答。13Rosenblatt‘sthematicanalysispermitsconsiderableobjectivity;heevenexplicitlystatesthatitisnothisintentiontojudgethemeritofthevariousworks—yethisreluctanceseemsmisplaced,especiallysinceanattempttoappraisemighthaveledtointerestingresults.R的主题分析表现出相当的客观性;他甚至明确表示他无意评判不同作品的价值——尽管他的保留似乎没有必要，特别是既然评价的尝试可能引发有趣的结果。14Forinstance,someofthenovelsappeartobestructurallydiffuse.Isthisadefect,oraretheauthorsworkingoutof,ortryingtoforge,adifferentkindofaesthetic?比如说，某些小说的看似结构散乱。这是一种缺陷吗，还是作者刻意为之，抑或尝试伪造一种不同的美学标准?15Inaddition,thestyleofsomeBlacknovels,likeJeanToomer‘sCane,vergesonexpressionismorsurrealism;doesthistechniqueprovideacounterpointtotheprevalentthemethatportraysthefateagainstwhichBlackheroesarepitted,athemeusuallyconveyedbymorenaturalisticmodesofexpression?另外，一些黑人小说的风格，比如JTC，非常接近表现主义或超自然主义;该技巧是否提供了一种对照，相较于最流行的描述黑人英雄对抗命运的主题，一种经常通过更自然主义的表达方式传递的主题?16Inspiteofsuchomissions,whatRosenblattdoesincludeinhisdiscussionmakesforanastuteandworthwhilestudy.尽管存在诸如此类的种种遗漏，R已完成的讨论确实是敏锐的又有价值的研究。17BlackFictionsurveysawidevarietyofnovels,bringingtoourattentionintheprocesssomefascinatingandlittle-knownworkslikeJamesWeldonJohnson‘sAutobiographyofanEx-ColoredMan.《BF》全面研究了相当多的小说，讨论过程中使我们注意到一些少有问津的迷人作品，比如JWJ的《AoaECM》。18Itsargumentistightlyconstructed,anditsforthright,lucidstyleexemplifieslevelheadedandpenetratingcriticism.它的观点结构严密，作者直截了当、简明易读的风格，堪称条理清晰，深刻敏锐的典范。TheauthorofthepassageobjectstocriticismofBlackfictionlikethatbyAddisonGaylebecauseitemphasizespurelyliteraryaspectsofsuchfictionmisinterpretstheideologicalcontentofsuchfi