![房颤治疗新型抗凝药物进展课件_第1页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac4410/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac44101.gif)
![房颤治疗新型抗凝药物进展课件_第2页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac4410/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac44102.gif)
![房颤治疗新型抗凝药物进展课件_第3页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac4410/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac44103.gif)
![房颤治疗新型抗凝药物进展课件_第4页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac4410/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac44104.gif)
![房颤治疗新型抗凝药物进展课件_第5页](http://file4.renrendoc.com/view/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac4410/d1d8eb1e617c152051583a1b5dac44105.gif)
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
房颤新型抗凝药物进展杨新春首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院心脏中心
阵发性房颤持续性房颤年中风率(%)房颤与中风房颤增加中风危险4-5倍中风是非常最常见和灾难性的后果房颤患者全因中风率5%房颤是中风的独立危险因素美国大约15%的中风由房颤引起中风危险随年龄增长无症状房颤患者中风危险同样存在即使是节律控制的患者中风发现同样存在(AFFIRM,RACE研究)RACEII=RateControlEfficacyinPermanentAtrialFibrillation.FusterV,etal.JAmCollCardiol.2006;48(4):e149-e246.KannelWB,etal.MedClinNorthAm.2008;92(1):17-42.PageRL,etal.Circulation.2003;107(8):1141-1145.HartRG,etal.JAmCollCardiol.2000;35(1):183-187.DulliDA,etal.Neuroepidemiology.2003;22(2):118-123.低危中危高危1086420房颤并发脑卒中的机制血流缓慢、内皮功能障碍及血液的高凝状态等使血液易发生淤滞左心耳的栓子可引发栓塞,导致脑卒中或全身动脉栓塞Wolfetal.Stroke1991;22:983-9881/6的中风归因于房颤FraminghamStudy%年龄组(岁)010203050–5960–6970–7980–89房颤患病率归因于房颤的中风中国住院房颤病人抗血小板和抗凝治疗现状阿司匹林华发林不用房颤-中风危险分层CHADS2CHA2DS2-VASc危险因素积分Cardiacfailure心力衰竭1HTN高血压1Age≥75y年龄1Diabetes糖尿病1Stroke中风2危险因素积分Cardiacfailure心力衰竭1HTN高血压1Age≥75y年龄2Diabetes糖尿病1Stroke中风2Vascdz(MI,PAD,aorticath)血管病变1Age65-74y年龄1Sexcategory(female)女性1LipGY,HalperinJL.AmJMed.2010;123(6):484-488.012345605101520中风率%01.32.23.24.06.79.8CHA2DS2-VASc积分7899.615.26.7CHA2DS2-VASc积分与年中风率积分
年中风率(%)
0 1.9
1 2.8
2 4.0 3 5.9 4 8.5 5 12.5 6
18.2HAS-BLED出血危险积分ESCAFGuidelinesEHJ2010字母临床特征分值HHypertension高血压1AAbnormalrenalandliverfunction肝肾功能异常1或2SStroke中风1BBleeding出血1LLabileINRINR易变1EElderly老年1DDrugsoralcohol药物或酗酒1或29华法林—预防房颤缺血性脑卒中不可取代的药物华法林面临的问题起效/停药可逆性慢剂量反应难于预测治疗剂量范围窄药物和食物相互反应监测麻烦高出血率OddsRatio05.06.08.0INR1.02.03.04.07.05.015.010.0—中风—颅内出血1.0Fusteretal.JAmCollCardiol.2001;38:1231-1266.缺血性中风与颅内出血校正的OR与抗凝强度的关系房颤应用华法林现状
局限性导致治疗不足SamsaGP,etal.ArchInternMed2000;160:967.INR超过目标
6%未达到治疗剂量INR
13%INR在目标范围15%无华法林65%房颤患者抗凝治疗一级预防的现状治疗窗内时间TTR
(TimeinTherapeuticRange)
口服华法林期间达到目标INR时间的百分比分析评价口服抗凝剂的疗效差异
SPORTIFIII和V华法林组与对照组患者结果事件差异
TTR<60%
TTR60-75%
TTR>75%结果TTR<60%TTR60-75%TTR>75%死亡率,%4.21.841.69严重出血,%3.851.961.58中风/外周栓塞,%2.101.341.07ArchInternMed.
2007.WhiteHD,GruberM,FeyziJ,KaatzS,TseH,HustedS,AlbersG研究中的新型抗凝剂TFPI(tifacogin)IdraparinuxRivaroxaban
Apixaban
EndoxabanBetrixabanLY517717
YM150TAK42Dabigatran口服胃肠外DX-9065a
OtamixabanXaIIaTF/VIIaXIXIXaVIIIaVaII(thrombin)FibrinFibrinogenATAPC(drotrecoginalfa)sTM(ART-123)AdaptedfromWeitzJI.ThrombHaemost2007;5Suppl1:65-7.TTP889APC活化蛋白CAT抗凝血酶sTM可溶性血栓调节素TF组织因子TFPI组织因子途径抑制物关于新型抗凝剂的试验ARISTOTLE–Apixaban(阿司匹林)RELY–Dabigatran(华发林)ROCKET–Rivaroxaban(华发林)ENGAGE–Edoxaban(华法林)AVERROES–Apixaban(华法林)与warfarin相比,AFIII期临床试验Re-LYROCKET-AFARISTOTLEENGAGEAF-TIMI48DrugDabigatranRivaroxabanApixabanEdoxabanDose(mg)Freq150,110BID20(15*)QD5(2.5*)BID60*,30*QDN18,11314,26618,206>21,000DesignPROBE2xblind2xblind2xblindCHADS2≥1≥2≥1≥1AFcriteriaAF<6mthsAF(>1in<30d)AForAFl<12mthsAF<12mths%VKAnaive50%38%43%40%goal*Doseadjustedinpatientswith↓drugclearance.**Maxof10%withCHADS-2score=2andnostroke/TIA/SEEPROBE=prospective,randomized,open-label,blindedendpointevaluation VKA=VitaminKantagonistApixaban5mgBIDASA(81-324mg/d)AF合并≥1危险因素,不适合服用VKA主要终点:StrokeorSystemicEmbolicEvent(SEE)5,600病人AVERROES设计2.5mgBID(在选择的病人)R36个国家,522个中心双盲NEnglJMed2011;364:806-817.CumulativeRisk0.00.010.030.050369121821ASAApixabanNo.atRiskASAApix2791272025412124154162632928092761256721271523617353MonthsRR=0.4695%CI=0.33-0.64p<0.001Strokeor
SystemicEmbolicEvent54%ACTIVEA,NEnglJMed2009;360:1-13HartRG,etal.AnnInternMed.2007;146:857-867AVERROES;ESCHotline2010,NEnglJMed2011;364:806-817从SPAF试验我们对使用抗血小板得到什么启发在AF与ASA抗栓治疗相比Clopidogrel+ASAVKAApixabanFavorstreatmentFavorsASA100%50%050%100%Relativeriskreduction(95%CI)FavorstreatmentFavorsASA50%050%100%Relativeriskincrease(95%CI)StrokeReductionIncreaseinIntracranialBleeding-28%-38%-54%+87%+128%-15%100%AVERROES结论对不适合VKA治疗,相对于ASA,apixaban
减少卒中>50%,并不增加大出血与ASA相比,Apixaban
可以很好耐受,尚没有肝毒性的证据对不适合VKA的房颤病人,apixaban有可能降低危险从SPAF试验我们对使用抗血小板药物得到什么启发?
summary
在预防AF卒中,对不适合华法林时,ASA
仍然是目前仅有的替代药物,但仅是中等有效联合
ASA
和clopidogrel比ASA更有效,但仍不如warfarin有效,且可以引起出血增加在AVERROES
试验,对较广范围的不适合warfarin的AF病人,Apixaban显示比ASA更有效,安全相似,更好耐受RE-LY:非劣效性检验设计ROpen•房颤伴≥1危险因素•没有禁忌症•患者来自44国家的951中心华法林调整INR2.0–3.0N=6000Dabigatranetexilate110mgBIDN=6000Dabigatranetexilate150mgBIDN=6000盲法结果判定开放双盲RRE-LY:中风或周围血管栓塞0.500.751.001.251.50Dabigatran110vs.华法林Dabigatran150vs.华法林非劣效性p-值<0.001<0.001优效性p-值
0.34<0.001Margin=1.46HR(95%CI)华法林更好Dabigatran更好Connollyetal.,NEJM,2009RR0.40(95%CI:0.27–0.60)p<0.001(sup)RE-LY:颅内出血RR0.31(95%CI:0.20–0.47)p<0.001(sup)Numberofevents0,23%0,74%0,30%RRR69%RRR60%Connollyetal.,NEJM,2009CammJ.:OralpresentationatESConAug30th2009.缺血性中风与周围血管栓塞荟萃分析WvsplaceboWvsWlowdoseWvsASAWvsASA+clopidogrelWvsdabigatran15000.30.60.91.21.51.82.0倾向华法林倾向其他治疗150mgBIDMODERNERA:RE-LY
StuartConnollyMD,MichaelD.EzekowitzMD,SalimYusuf MD,…..Wallentin.DabigatranversusWafarininPatientswith AtrialFibrillation.NEJM2009,361.c&NEJM2010,363RE-LY结论与传统的华法林相比,达比加群两种剂量均显示出优势达比加群150mg更有效而达比加群110mg有更好的安全性两种有效剂量各有其优缺点,在临床上对不同特点的患者可做不同的治疗选择Warfarin(targetINR2-3)Apixaban5mgoraltwicedaily(2.5mgBIDinselectedpatients)Primaryoutcome:strokeorsystemicembolismHierarchicaltesting:non-inferiorityforprimaryoutcome,superiorityforprimaryoutcome,majorbleeding,deathRandomizedoubleblind,doubledummy(n=18,201)InclusionriskfactorsAge≥75yearsPriorstroke,TIAorSEHForLVEF≤40%DiabetesmellitusHypertensionWarfarin/warfarinplaceboadjustedbyINR/shamINRbasedonencryptedpoint-of-caretestingdevice
ExclusionMechanicalprostheticvalveSevererenalinsufficiencyNeedforaspirinplusthienopyridineAtrialFibrillationwithatLeastOneAdditionalRiskFactorforStrokeARISTOTLEMainTrialResults
21%RRR31%RRRISTHmajorbleedingStrokeorsystemicembolismMedianTTR66%Apixaban212patients,1.27%peryearWarfarin265patients,1.60%peryearHR0.79(95%CI,0.66–0.95);P=0.011Apixaban327patients,2.13%peryearWarfarin462patients,3.09%peryearHR0.69(95%CI,0.60–0.80);P<0.001Warfarin(targetINR2-3)Apixaban5mgoraltwicedaily(2.5mgBIDinselectedpatients)Primaryoutcome:strokeorsystemicembolismHierarchicaltesting:non-inferiorityforprimaryoutcome,superiorityforprimaryoutcome,majorbleeding,deathRandomizedoubleblind,doubledummy(n=18,201)InclusionriskfactorsAge≥75yearsPriorstroke,TIA,orSEHForLVEF≤40%DiabetesmellitusHypertensionWarfarin/warfarinplaceboadjustedbyINR/shamINRbasedonencryptedpoint-of-caretestingdeviceMajorexclusioncriteriaMechanicalprostheticvalveSevererenalinsufficiencyNeedforaspirinplusthienopyridineAtrialFibrillationwithatLeastOneAdditionalRiskFactorforStrokePrimaryOutcome
Stroke(ischemicorhemorrhagic)orsystemicembolismApixaban212patients,1.27%peryearWarfarin265patients,1.60%peryearHR0.79(95%CI,0.66–0.95);P(superiority)=0.011No.atRiskApixaban 9120 8726 8440 6051 3464 1754Warfarin 9081 8620 8301 5972 3405 1768P(non-inferiority)<0.00121%RRRMajorBleeding
ISTHdefinitionApixaban327patients,2.13%peryearWarfarin 462patients,3.09%peryearHR0.69(95%CI,0.60–0.80);P<0.001No.atRiskApixaban 9088 8103 7564 5365 3048 1515Warfarin 9052 7910 7335 5196 2956 149131%RRRMODERNERA:ARISTOTLEGranger,Alexander,MacMurray….Wallentin.,NEJM2011ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinStrokeorsystemicembolism
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.0.512NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinHemorrhagicstroke
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.
0.1ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM201112ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinStrokeofischemicorunknownorigin
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.0.512ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinAll-causemortality
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.0.512ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinMajorbleeding
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.0.512ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinMajor+clinicallyrelevantbleeding
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.0.512ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinGastrointestinalbleeding
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.0.512NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinIntracranialhemorrhage
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.
0.1ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM201112ConnollySetalNEJM2009;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011NewantithrombotictherapiescomparedtowarfarinMyocardialinfarction
Dabigatran150mgb.i.d. Dabigatran110mgb.i.d. Rivaroxaban20mgo.d. Abixaban5mgb.i.d.0.512NewanticoagulantscomparedtowarfarininAF2011EffetonoutcomeeventD150D110RivaApixNoninferioritystrokeReductionhemorrhagicstroke√√√√√√√√Reductionischemicstroke√√√√ReductionmortalityReductionmajorbleedingIncreasegastrointestinalbleeding(√)
√√(√)(√)IncreasemyocardialinfarctionFewertreatmentdiscontinuationsValidationinasecondrandomizedtrial√√ConnollySetalNEJM2009&NEJM2011;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011从SPAF试验我们对使用抗凝药物得到什么启发?-summaryDabigatran,rivaroxaban,apixaban都提供比warfarin重要的优势,包括方便,至少有相似预防卒中的效果,少的颅内出血ARISTOTLE发现在预防卒中和系统性栓塞,使用单剂量的apixaban比warfarin有效,且发生出血减少,死亡率降低,期望新的药物对房颤病人提供改善机会,包括有适应症,但目前又未服用任何口服抗凝药物的病人
Warfarin RiskforstrokeandIntracranialbleeding
Apixaban DabigatranRivaroxabansideeffectse.g.otherbleedings Survival Patientpreferences Healtheconomy
ThreenewanticoagulantssuperiortoWarfarinforpreventionofstrokeandintracranialbleedinginAF available2011在2011年,与warfarin相比,EffetonoutcomeeventD150D110RivaApixStrokeorsystemicembolism(Noninferiority)√√√√Reductionischemicstroke√√√√ReductionmortalityReductionmajorbleedingIncreasegastrointestinalbleeding(√)
√√(√)(√)IncreasemyocardialinfarctionFewertreatmentdiscontinuationsValidationinasecondrandomizedtrial√√ConnollySetalNEJM2009&NEJM2011;PatelMetalNEJM2011;GrangerCetalNEJM2011新抗凝剂Apixaban对房颤病人提供全面保护作用ReductionhemorrhagicstrokeStrokeorsystemicembolism(superiority)√√√√√√谢谢!RELYDabigatran110mgDabigatran150mgWarfarinCHADS2
Mean0-1(%)2(%)3+(%)2.132.634.732.72.232.235.232.62.130.937.032.1C.MichaelGibson,M.S.,M.D.ROCKETAFRivaroxabanWarfarinCHADS2Mean2(%)3(%)4(%)5(%)6(%)3.51343291323.5134428122ARISTOTLERivaroxabanWarfarinCHADS2Mean0-1(%)2(%)3+(%)2.13435.830.22.13435.830.2PatelMRetal,NEJM2011;ConnollySJ,etal.NEnglJMed.2009;361:1139-1151;GrangerCetal,NEngJMed;20113+86%ARISTOTLECOVERACROSSCHADS2SCORE临床试验中TTR的情况RE-LYROCKETAFARISTOTLETimeinTherapeuticRange(TTR)64%67%warfarin-experienced61%warfarin-naïveMean55%Median58%Mean62%Median66%C.MichaelGibson,M.S.,M.D.PatelMRetal,NEJM2011;ConnollySJ,etal.NEnglJMed.2009;361:1139-1151;GrangerCetal,NEngJMed;2011Theinternationalnormalizedratio(INR)testisthelaboratorytestusedtodeterminethedegreetowhichthepatient'scoagulationhasbeensuccessfullysuppressedbythevitaminKantagonist(VKA).Formostpatients,thegoalistokeeptheINRbetween2and3,whichroughlycorrespondstothebloodtaking2to3timesaslongtoclotaswouldanormalperson'sblood.Thislevelofanticoagulationhasbeenshowntomaximizebenefit(i.e.,protectpatientsfrombloodclots)whileminimizingrisk(i.e.,riskofhemorrhageattributabletoexcessiveanticoagulation).TherapeuticINRrange(TTR)isawayofsummarizingINRcontrolovertimeRE-LYDabigatran110mg 1.53%/yrDabigatran150mg 1.11%/yrWarfarin 1.69%/yrROCKETAFRivaroxaban20mg 2.1%/yrWarfarin 2.4%/yrARISTOTLEApixaban5mg 1.27%/yrWarfarin 1.60%/yr主要终点
StrokeorSystemicEmbolism:非劣效性分析
p<0.001p<0.001
p<0.001NonInferiorirtypvswarfarinITTAnalysisModifiedITTNoITTanalysisisavailablefornon-inferiorityinRocketAF.Anontreatmentorper-protocolanalysisisgenerallyperformedintheassessmentofnon-inferiority.Ifnumerouspatientscomeoffofstudydrug,thisbiasesthetrialtowardsanon-inferiorresultinanITTanalysis.Thisisthebasisforperformingaper-protocolanalysisinanon-inferiorityassessment.C.MichaelGibson,M.S.,M.D.
p<0.001ITTAnalysisPatelMRetal,NEJM2011;ConnollySJ,etal.NEnglJMed.2009;361:1139-1151;GrangerCetal,NEngJMed;2011HR=0.88HR=0.79HR=0.91HR=0.66superiority
p=0.12p<0.001
p=0.34ITTAnalysisModifiedITT
P=0.01ITTAnalysis出血性卒中Dabigatran110mg 0.12%/yr 0.31 <0.001Dabigatran150mg 0.10%/yr 0.26 <0.001Warfarin 0.38%/yrHRITTP-valueRivaroxaban20mg 0.26%/yr 0.59 0.024*Warfarin 0.44%/yrROCKETRELYC.MichaelGibson,M.S.,M.D.*InanontreatmentanalysisinRocketAFHemorrhagicStokerateswere0.26%/yrforrivaroxabanand0.44%/yrforwarfarin,p=0.024.NoontreatmentanalysisisavailablefromRE-LY.Apixaban5mg 0.24%/yr 0.51 <0.001Warfarin 0.47%/yrARISTOTLEPatelMRetal,NEJM2011;ConnollySJ,etal.NEnglJMed.2009;361:1139-1151;GrangerCetal,NEngJMed;2011缺血性卒中Dabigatran110mg 1.34%/yr 1.11 0.35Dabigatran150mg 0.92%/yr 0.76 0.03
Warfarin 1.20%/yrHRITTP-valueRivaroxaban20mg 1.62%/yr 0.99 0.92*Warfarin 1.64%/yrROCKETRELYC.MichaelGibson,M.S.,M.D.*InanontreatmentanalysisinRocketAFIschemicStokerateswere1.34%/yrforrivaroxabanand1.42%/yrforwarfarin,p=0.58.NoontreatmentanalysisisavailablefromRE-LYandAristotle.Aoixaban5mg 0.97%/yr 0.92 0.42Warfarin 1.05%/yrARISTOTLEPatelMRetal,NEJM2011;ConnollySJ,etal.NEnglJMed.2009;361:1139-1151;GrangerCetal,NEngJMed;2011Dabigatran110mg 2.71%/yr 0.8 0.003Dabigatran150mg 3.11%/yr 0.93 0.31Warfarin 3.36150mgDabigatranvs110mgDabigatran=HRof1.16(1.00–1.34)p=0.052大出血MajorBleedingHRITTP-valueRE-LYRivaroxaban20mg 3.60%/yr 1.04 0.58*Warfarin 3.4%/yrROCKETC.MichaelGibson,M.S.,M.D.*ThereisnoITTanalysisofsafetyinRocketAF.ThereisnoontreatmentanalysisofsafetyfromRE-LY.OnTreatmentP-valueP-valueApixaban5mg 2.13%/yr 0.69 <0.001Warfarin 3.09%/yrARISTOTLEPatelMRetal,NEJM2011;ConnollySJ,etal.NEnglJMed.2009;361:1139-1151;GrangerCetal,NEngJMed;20112gdropin24hours2gdropAllCauseMortalityDabigatran110mg 3.75%/yr 0.91 0.13Dabigatran150mg 3.64%/yr 0.88 0.051Warfarin 4.13%/yrHRITTp-valueRivaroxaban20mg 4.5%/yr 0.92 0.15*Warfarin 4.9%/yrROCKETRELYC.MichaelGibson,M.S.,M.D.*Inanontreatment
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025年中子、电子及Γ辐照装置合作协议书
- 2025年机载设备综合测试台合作协议书
- 2025年石材翻新护理用品合作协议书
- 建筑力学期末考试B卷试题及答案
- 2025年个人货物运输协议模板(2篇)
- 2025年个人房屋设计装修合同(4篇)
- 2025年五年级体育教师工作总结(5篇)
- 2025年仪器销售合同标准版本(4篇)
- 2025年五年级语文备课组长工作总结范文(二篇)
- 2025年二手车车辆转让合同简单版(2篇)
- DB43-T 2142-2021学校食堂建设与食品安全管理规范
- 宏观利率篇:债券市场研究分析框架
- 桥梁顶升移位改造技术规范
- 六年级语文(上册)选择题集锦
- 介绍人提成方案
- 天津在津居住情况承诺书
- PHOTOSHOP教案 学习资料
- 初中数学教学“教-学-评”一体化研究
- 2012年安徽高考理综试卷及答案-文档
- 《游戏界面设计专题实践》课件-知识点5:图标绘制准备与绘制步骤
- 自动扶梯安装过程记录
评论
0/150
提交评论