国际商事仲裁法(双语)教学内容

1、CONTENTSONNTERNATIONALCOMMERCIALARBITRATIONLAW国际商事仲裁法（双语）教学内容二、双语教学教材121世纪国际法学系列教材国际商编著，中国人民大学出版社，2004年（社的邀请，申请人于今年初又进行了修2国际商事仲裁案例解析（中文），事仲裁法（中英双语教材）,赵秀文该教材出版后得到好评，应人大出版订，2008年5月底第二版即将面世）；赵秀文主编，中国人民大学出版社，、课程说明课程性质：选修课程语言：中英双语授课对象：法学本科学时：36学分：2授课教师：中国人民大学法学院赵秀文教授章节后的案例）；2005年版（书中收集的案例，都出自于双语教材各3国际商事仲

2、裁法参考资料（中英文对照）赵秀文、谢菁菁编著，中国人民大学出版社，2006年版（书中收集了纽约公约等国际公约、联合国贸法会的国际商事仲裁示范法、仲裁规则；中、美、法、德等各主要国家的仲裁法；以及中国国际经济法贸易仲裁委员会、国际商会国际仲裁院、伦敦国际仲裁院、美国仲裁协会等国际主要仲裁机构的仲裁规则）。CHAPTER1GENERALINTRODUCTIONOFINTERNATIONALCOMMERCIALARBITRATIONLAW第一章导论课时：2本章的教学目的是要求学生理解并掌握国际商事仲裁的起源与发展、国际商事仲裁法的概念、性质和法律渊源；以及我国国际仲裁法的主要内容。Relations

3、anddifferencebetweenarbFunctoifotnhisenternactoinovneanlatnimdoondslealiwnthuenificBasicprinciplesofinternationalcoChineseinternationalcommercialarbResearchmethodfortheinternationaSection1ArbitrationandOtherMethodsfortheSettlementofDisputeOriginanddevelopmentofarbitration：Arbitrationisdevelopedwitht

4、heneedsofcommercialbusiness.Itisthevoluntarymethodforthesettlementofdisputebasedonthepartiesagreement.Natureandcharacteristicsofarbitration:Arbitrationiscontractualinnaturebasicallyasamethodforthesettlementofdispute.Noarbitrationagreement,noarbitration.Thismethodlaterincorporatedintothelegalsystemof

5、theState.Thenationalcourtshallenforcethearbitrationagreementaswellasthearbitralawardsinaccordancewiththelocallaw.Inthisregards,italsocarriesoutthejudicialnature.RelationshipbetweenarbitrationandothermethodsforthesettlementofdisputeArbitrationlawgoverningarbitration:Arbitrationincorporatedadvantagesf

6、rombothADRandlitigation.ItismoreflexibleasADRastothepartiesautonomy.Thearbitralawardcouldbeenforceableasthecourtjudgement.Section2InternationalCommercialArbitrationLawOriginanddevelopmentofinternationalcommercialarbitrationlaw:Itoriginsfromthenationallawandinternationalconventions.Partiesfortheinter

7、nationalcommercialarbitrationlaw:mostlybetweenthepartieswithequallegalstatus,thatistheprivateparties.Subjectmattersoftheinternationalcommercialarbitrationlaw-relationshipbetweenthepartiesunderthearbitrationagreement-relationshipbetweenthearbitrationinstitution,arbitrationtribunalandtheparties-nation

8、alcourtssupervisionontheinternationalcommercialarbitrationlawSourcesofinternationalcommercialarbitrationlaw-Domesticarbitrationlaw-Internationallegislation:bilateraljudicialcooperationtreaty,internationalconvention,modellawSection3BasicPrinciplesofInternationalCommercialArbitrationLawPartiesautonomy

9、:thepartiesmayselectthearbitrationinstitution,appliedrules,arbitrators,languages,placeofarbitrationandsoon.Independentandimpartialsettlementdisputesbythearbitraltribunal:arbitratorsaredifferentfromnationaljudgesastothefieldofimplementationoflaw.Thefunctionsforthesettlementofdisputearesimilar.Theonly

10、objectiveforthearbitratoristorenderawardsindependentlyandimpartially.Nationalcourtssupervisiononthearbitration:Sincethenationalcourtsimplementlawinpublicfield,thearbitralawardsaresubjecttothecourtssupervision.Thecourtmaysetasidenationalawardormayrefusenationalandforeignawardsattherequestofthepartyac

11、cordingtonationallaw.Section4InternationalCommercialArbitrationLawinChinaDomesticarbitrationlawBilateraljudicialcooperationtreatyandinternationalconventiontowhichChinaisapartySection5ConstructionoftheCourseArbitrationinstitutionsInternationalarbitrationagreementArbitrationtribunalArbitrationprocedur

12、esThelawgoverningthearbitrationAwardandremediesCourtsupervisionCaseStudy:GermanZueblinv.WuxiWoco本章教学要点：1、仲裁是当事人之间通过协议约定的将他们之间的争议提交给独立的第三者裁断的解决争议的方法。仲裁既有诉讼解决争议的终，对于协调和纽约公约统一了各示范法则为各公正地解决争议的原则和法院现已建立了由国内仲裁立法与2、与解决争议的其它方法，包括诉讼的方法和ADR方法相比，局性，又有ADR方法解决争议的自愿性和灵活性。它集当事人之间的自愿性与法律上的强制性为一体，同时具有契约和司法的性质。3、由联合国

13、主持制订的纽约公约和联合国贸法会主持制订的示范法统一各国有关国际商事仲裁的立法与实践，具有重要的指导作用。缔约国对仲裁协议效力的承认和拒绝承认与执行外国仲裁裁决的条件；国制订调整本国国际商事仲裁关系的法律提供了参照系。4、国际商事仲裁的基本原则是协议仲裁原则、仲裁庭独立、对仲裁实施保障和监督的原则。5、中国有关国际商事仲裁的立法，经历了从无到有的过程，我国缔结或参加的国际公约为主体的比较完善的仲裁法体系。我国国际商事仲裁法包括我国立法机关颁布的调整国际商事仲裁关系的法律规范，以及我国缔结或参加的双边和多边调整国际商事仲裁关系的法律规范的总称。6、研究国际商事仲裁法要从我国相关的立法与实践出发，

14、运用综合的和比较的方法，对国际商事仲裁中所涉及的重大理论与实践问题，进行深入的比较研究。CHAPTER2INTERNATIONALCOMMERCIALARBITRATIONINSTITUTIONS第二章国际商事仲裁机构课时：4本章的教学目的是要求学生理解并掌握临时仲裁机构与常设仲裁机构之间的区别、常设仲裁机构在通过仲裁解决争议中的作用、主要的国际商事仲裁机构，以及我国现行国际仲裁制度、仲裁委员会及其作用。RelationsanddifferencebetweenadhFunctionsofinternationalpermanentMaininternationalcommercialarbi

15、trInternationalcommercialarbitrationSection1GeneralIntroductionAdhocv.InstlArbitration:basicdistinctionbetweentheadhocandinstitutionalarbitrationasfollowings:-Businessplace-Administrationstaff-Rulesofarbitration-PanellistPermanentarbitrationinstitutionssetintheState:CIETAC,AAA,SCC,SIAC,LCIA.setbyint

16、ernationalconventions:ICSIDSection2FunctionsofInstitutionalArbitrationDraftarbitrationrules&supervisionontheapplicationoftheRulesAdministrationworksMaintainpanellistPreliminarydecisiononthejurisdictionAssistancetothecompositionofthearbitrationtribunalAppointmentorwithdrawoftheappointmentofthearbitra

17、torMainArbitrationInstitutionsintheWorld-AmericanArbitrationAssociation(AAA)-LondonCourtofInternationalArbitration(LCIA)-ArbitrationInstituteoftheStockholmChamberofCommerce(SCC)-ChinaInternationalEconomic&TradeArbitrationCommission(CIETAC)-SingaporeInternationalArbitrationCenter(SIAC)-AmericanArbitr

18、ationAssociation(AAA)Section3LegislationandPracticesinthePRCProvisionsoftheArbitrationLawontheArbitrationInstitutionArbitrationCommission(Art.10-13)Arbitrationagreementmustincludethedefinitearbitrationinstitution(Art.16)Supplementaryagreementneededifnoarbitrationinstitutionintheagreement,otherwisein

19、valid(Art.18)CIETAC(ChinaInternationalEconomicandTradeArbitrationCommission)isthemajorarbitrationinstitutiontodealwithinternationalarbitrationcases.Itwassetupin1954asthenameofForeignTradeArbitrationCommission(FTAC).Withtheopendoorpolicyin1978,FTACchangeditsnameasForeignEconomicandTradeArbitrationCom

20、mission(FETAC)in1980andCIETAC1988.Inaddition,ithastwobraches:CIETACSouthChinaSub-Commission(ShenzhenBranch)andCIETACShanghaiSub-Commission.OtherArbitrationCommissionsinChinaIndependentInstitutions:bynowaltogetherabout185arbitrationcommissionsinChina.Independenteachother:subjectneithertothegovernment

21、nortoanyofthearbitrationcommission.Independentpanel:Eacharbitrationcommissionkeepsitsownpanellist.Independentarbitrationrules:Eacharbitrationcommissionkeepsitsowntheappliedarbitrationrules.Independentmanagement:Eacharbitrationcommissionhasitsownsecretariatandpersonnel.德国奥特克案（4752页）案情租船合同中的仲裁条款？临时仲裁还

22、是机构仲裁？裁决在我国的承认与执行？思考题：1如何认定租约格式的法律效力？应当如何认定丸红公司与奥特克之间的租船合同的订立时间？应当适用哪一个国家的法律对此作出认定？2、丸红公司与奥特克之间的租船合同对南京外运公司是否具有法律上的拘束力？为什么？3、应当如何对格式合同和租船合同中的仲裁条款作出适当的解释？你同意武汉海事法院对仲裁条款独立性做出的解释吗？为什么？4、本案仲裁属于临时仲裁还是机构仲裁，为什么？临时仲裁与机构仲裁之间的主要区别是什么？5、临时仲裁裁决是否属于仲裁裁决，应否得到我国法院的承认与执行？6、本案仲裁庭的组成是否符合仲裁协议的规定？仲裁程序是否适当？当事人在仲裁协议中约定了两

23、个可供选择的仲裁地点是否属于“浮动仲裁条款”？这样的仲裁条款可以执行吗？7应当适用什么样的法律认定租约格式和租船合同中的仲裁条款的效力？8你对最高人民法院对奥特克案裁决作出承认与执行的指示，有何评论？本章教学要点1、根据处理国际商事争议的仲裁机构由无固定的办公场所和章程，仲裁机构可以分为临时仲裁机构和常设仲裁机构。临时仲裁机构专门为了审理某一特定的仲裁案件而设立，案件审理完毕，该仲裁机构的使命即告完成。、常设仲裁机构通常根据一国的法律在某一特定地点设立，其主要职能是为仲裁案件的审理提供相关的管理方面服务，包括制订仲裁规则和示范仲裁条款、协助组成仲裁庭，按照应当适用的仲裁规则指定仲裁员或者撤销对

24、仲裁员的指定，以及依照相关的规则对仲裁程序的实施情况进行监督等。、国际上一些主要贸易大国均设有常设仲裁机构，如在法国巴黎设立的国际商会仲裁院、伦敦国际仲裁院、斯德哥尔摩商会仲裁院、美国仲裁协会等。这些常设仲裁机构一般都有自己的仲裁规则，有的也备有供当事人选择的仲裁员名册，许多仲裁机构还允许当事人自行选择应当适用的仲裁规则。、在我国国际商事仲裁实践上，以审理国际仲裁案件为其主要业务来源的国际商事仲裁机构有中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会和中国海事仲裁委员会。根据我国现行仲裁立法与实践，如果国内案件的当事人约定将其争议提交上述国际仲裁机构审理，国际仲裁机构根据应当适用的仲裁规则，也可以受理国内案件。另一

25、方面，国内仲裁机构也可以根据国际仲裁协议的当事人之间的约定，审理国际仲裁案件。QuestionsandCommentsatisthetypicaldifenebetweenthocarbittioninstitution?thpartiesagreedinthirarbitrationnttothticualrabritraitnisotnitution,whatritrartiuolneshsoulbdeappliedinsuccase?Ontheothnd,ifthepartiesabittiinosntitutionsrulesforitratingtheirdispute,supRul

26、ews,ithoumtentioninIgCACrbitraCtioounrftorthesettlemoefntthedispute,ichrbitrationinstitutionhasurisdictionoverthecase?CuntlytherearemoretnarbitrationcommissionsinstitutionsqualifiedtoarbitratinternationaldisputesCHAPTER3INTERNATIONALCOMMERCIALARBITRATIONAGREEMENT第三章国际商事仲裁协议课时：4本章的教学目的是要求学生理解并掌握国际商事仲

27、裁协议的性质及其表现形式、仲裁协议的效力及其确定、仲裁协议的转让、仲裁条款独立原则的理论与实践、以及我国有关仲裁协议的效力及其确定的立法与实践。IssuesNatureandformsofintValidityofinternationalAssignmentofinternationaLegislationandpracticnationalcommercialarbitrationcommercialarbitrationagrcommercialarbitationagsonthbitrationentSection1GeneralIntroductionDefinitiononthea

28、rbitrationagreementandFormsAgreementbetweenthepartiestosubmittheirdisputeforthesettlementbyarbitration:contractualinnature.ThearbitrationagreementcouldbereflectedeitherinanindependentdocumentintheformofSubmissiontoarbitration,orintheformofArbitrationclauseinacontract.Section2ValidityoftheInternation

29、alCommercialArbitrationAgreementanditsDeterminationApplicableLawfordecisionAgreedbytheparties:Thevalidityofarbitrationagreementcouldbedecidedinaccordancewiththelawagreedbytheparties.Seatofarbitrationifany:Ifthepartiesfailedtoreachanagreementastotheapplicablelaw,thelawoftheseatofarbitration,whichhasc

30、losestrelationshipwiththearbitration,shouldbeapplied.Lawofthenationalcourt:Thenationalcourtshalldecidewhichlawshouldbeappliedinaparticularcase.Forexample,whilenationalcourtisaskedtoenforcetheforeignawardmadeinotherstate,itmayrefusetoenforcesuchawardifthecourtconsidersthemattersasnonarbitrableaccordi

31、ngtothelocallaw.InagreementwithArt.5(1)(a)NewYorkConvention:NYCprovidedthattheapplicablelawforthearbitrationagreementshouldbedecidedbythenationallawbasedonthepartiesautonomy,thenthelawoftheseatofarbitrationandthatofthecourt.CompetentAuthoritytoDecidetheValidityoftheArbitrationAgreementArbitrationTri

32、bunal:basedonthedoctrineofcompetence-competence.NationalCourt:Itspowercomesfromthenationallaw.TheDoctrineofSeparabilityoftheArb.ClauseAnarbitrationclausewhichformspartofacontractshallbetreatedasanagreementindependentoftheothertermsofthecontract.Adecisionbythearbitraltribunalthatthecontractisnullandv

33、oidshallnotentailipsojure(L.依法律)theinvalidityofthearbitrationclause.Section3AssignmentoftheInternationalCommercialArbitrationAgreementAssignmentofArb.ClauseWhethertheassigneeisboundbythearbitrationclauseintheassignedcontract?LegislationandpracticesinothercountriesMS.EmjaCASE(教科书第95-98页).Construction

34、Kb/wFerus(Dutchshipyard)tobuildMs.EmjaforFirden(Dutchcompany).SalesKb/wFirdenandGermanEmjaduringconstructionoftheship.Ferussub-contractedBijlmashipyard.BijlsmacontractedSweddishWartsilafordeliveryofthedieselengines.dieselenginesdisputebroughtbyGermanMs.EmjaagainstSwidishWartsilaSection4Legislationan

35、dPracticesontheArbitrationAgreementinPRCValidityoftheArbitrationAgreement(Art.16,ChineseArbitrationLaw,CAL)IntentionofbothpartiestosettlementtheirdisputebyarbitrationMatterstobearbitratedDefinitearbitrationinstitution,excludingadhoccommercialarbitrationtribunalMatterstobearbitratedArt.2oftheJudicial

36、InterpretationbytheSupremeCourtin2006:Contractdisputesrefertotheformation,validity,amendment,assignment,performance,liabilitiesforthebreach,interpretation,terminationofthecontract.WrittenFormoftheArbitrationAgreementJudicialinterpretation(Art.1):apartfromthecontract,itcouldbeexpressedintheformoftele

37、graph,telex,EDI,email,etc.VoidArbitrationAgreementCAL:Article17,ifanagreedarbitrablematterexceedsthescopeofarbitrablematters(Art.2,3CAL)asspecifiedbylaw;ifapartythatconcludedthearbitrationagreementhasnocapacityforcivilactsorhaslimitedcapacityforcivilacts;orifonepartycoercedtheotherpartyintoconcludin

38、gthearbitrationagreement.Art.7oftheJudicialInterpretationonInvalidarbitrationagreement案例分析：浙江诸暨外贸诉香港恺威（第110页）Thepartiesagreedeitherarbitrationorlitigation.Unlessonepartyappliedforarbitration,theotherpartyfailedtochallengeofthevalidityofthearbitrationagreementpriortothefirsthearingofthearbitrationtri

39、bunal.Thepartiesfailedtoreachagreementonadefinitearbitrationinstitution.AuthoritytodecidethevalidityoftheArbitrationAgreement(CAL20)Ifapartychallengesthevalidityofthearbitrationagreement,hemayrequestanarbitrationcommissiontomakeadecisionoraPeoplesCourttogivearuling.Ifonepartyrequestsanarbitrationcom

40、missiontomakeadecisionandtheotherpartyrequestsaPeoplesCourttogivearuling,thePeoplesCourtshallgivearuling.Apartyschallengeofthevalidityofthearbitrationagreementshallberaisedpriortothefirsthearingofthearbitrationtribunal.CompetentCourttodecidevalidityoftheArbitrationAgreementinthePRCIntermediatepeople

41、scourt-wheretheagreedarb.Commissionlocated;-incaseofnoagreeddefinitearbitrationcommission,wheretheagreementwassignedorthepartiesdomicileorplaceofbusinesslocatedApplicableLawfordecisionJudicialinterpretation(Art.16):.AgreedbythepartiesSeatofarbitrationifany.Lawofthenationalcourt.InagreementwithArt.5(

42、1)(a)NewYorkConventionAssignmentoftheArbitrationAgreementJudicialInterpretationbytheSupremeCourtofthePRCin2006Thearb.Agreementisbindingonassigneewhilethepartiesmergedorseparated.SuccessorsresponsibilityAssignmentofcreditsandliabilities浙江诸暨外贸公司空白销售确认书仲裁条款的效力思考题：1、本案涉及的是中国外贸公司与香港公司之间的国际货物买卖合同中的仲裁条款的效力

43、问题的争议。你认为本案合同应当适用什么样的法律，为什么？2、如何认定国际货物买卖合同中的当事人意思表示一致？如何确定通过电报、传真等方式订立的国际货物买卖合同的时间？根据应当适用的法律，你认为本案合同是什么时候成立的？1、诸暨外贸公司的销售确认书中的条款对该公司有拘束力吗？2、法院认定本案交易有效，而该交易所依据的销售确认书中的仲裁条款无效，其依据是什么？你对法院对此案的处理有何评论？本章教学要点1、国际商事仲裁协议就其实质而言，具有契约的性质，因为它是当事人之间约定的将它们之间的争议提交仲裁解决的契约。此项契约可以表现为争议发生之前的国际商事合同中的仲裁条款，也可以表现为争议发生之后当事人之

44、间达成的一项单独的协议。2、鉴于国际商事仲裁协议所具有的契约性质，国际合同适用法律的一般原则，同样也应当适用于决定仲裁协议的有效性的适用法律。3、国际商事仲裁协议的转让，现行有关国际仲裁的国际立法和国内立法中均缺乏相关的法律规定。当主合同转让时，合同中的仲裁条款是否约束被转让人，归根结底取决于各相关国家的国内立法与实践。4、我国现行仲裁法对仲裁协议有效性的规定与联合国贸法会1985年国际商事仲裁示范法相比，比较严格。中国仲裁法关于仲裁协议有效性条款的修订，势在必行。QUESTIONSANDCOMMENTS1Whatisthenatureofinternationalcommercialarbi

45、trationagreement?2Isthereanydifferenceofthelegalstatusbetweenthearbitrationclauseandsubmissiontoarbitration?3Howtodecidetheapplicablelawtothearbitrationagreement?Doyouthinkthelawappliedtothemaincontractcouldalsobeappliedtothearbitrationclausetherein?4Whatisyourcommentontheeffectonthearbitrationclaus

46、ewhilethecontractthereinwastransferredtoathirdperson?Isthethirdpersonboundbythearbitrationclauseofthetransferredcontract?5WhatisyourcommentonChinaspresentarbitrationlawandpracticeinrespectofdeterminationofthevalidityofinternationalcommercialarbitrationagreement?案例分析：浙江诸暨外贸诉香港恺威（第110页）CHAPTER4ARBITRA

47、BLESUBJECT-MATTERINTHEINTERNATIONALCOMMERCIALARBITRATION第四章国际商事仲裁中的可仲裁事项课时：2本章的教学目的是要求学生理解并掌握可仲裁事项所涉及实质性问题、可仲裁事项的适用法律、以及我国有关可仲裁事项的立法与实践。SubstantialissuesrelatingtotheaRightsandobligationsoftheStateApplicablelawinthedeterminationLegislationandpracticesinChinaSection1GeneralIntroductionDefinitionWheth

48、erthedisputeunderthearbitrationagreementcouldbesettledbyarbitrationWhynotarbitrationPublicinterestconsiderationDifferentinterpretationindifferentperiodoftimeeveninthesamestateSionSoleimany(father)v.AbnerSoleimany(son)p.118EngagedintheexportofPersiancarpetsfromIranincontraventionofIranianRevenueLawsa

49、ndexportcontrolsAwardCourtproceduresSection2ArbitrabilityandApplicableLawNon-arbitrableMattersBystatuteBycaseApplicablelawtodecidethearbitrabilityissuesProperlawofthecontract(合同准据法)ProperlawofthearbitrationagreementLawoftheplaceofarbitrationLexloci(法院地法)AuthoritiesthatdecidetheapplicablelawArbitralt

50、ribunalNationalcourt-thecourtwithjurisdiction-thecourtwherethearbitrationistakenplace-thecourtwheretheenforcementissoughtSPAItalyv.MODIraqp.129ContractstobuildshipsforIraqnavyb/wthepartieswitharbitrationclauseEffectofUNembargoin1990ontheKsSPAsclaimforthefrustrationofKsanddamagesbeforeKswereperformed

51、Ct.offirstinstancenojurisdictionCt.ofAppeal:non-arbitrabilityofthecaseaccordingtoItalianlawSection3PartiestotheInternationalArbitrationAgreementandTheirCapacityStatescapacitytoarbitrationandapplicablelawELFAquitaineIran(France)v.NationalIranianOilCompany(NIOC)p.135Kb/wNIOCandERAP(Frenchstateagency)&

52、SofiranERAPentitledtobuycertaindiscoveredoilatapreferentialpriceERAPtransferredrightstoELFArbitrabilityofthedisputeonnationalizationissuesThearbitratorruledhisownjurisdictionSection4ForeignLegislationandPracticesConcerningtheArbitrableSubject-MatterM.S.A.(Belgium)v.Co.M.(Switzerland)p.151Exclusivedi

53、stributorshipagreementbetweenthepartieswithSwissLawapplicableArbitrationagreementisinvalidundertheBelgianLawbecausethesubjectmatterisnon-arbitrable.BelgianDistrictCt.grantedtheclaimCt.ofAppealreversedonthegroundthatarbitrabilityisascertainedaccordingtothelawwhichappliestothearbitrationagreementSecur

54、itiesArbitrationintheUSAWilkov.Swan(1953)Sherkv.Alberto-CulverCo.(1974)Rodriguezv.Shearson/AmericanExpress(1989)ArbitrationforIPRightsDisputeoverthevalidityoftherightsDisputeunderthelicensingagreementsUSpracticesAntitrustClaimsAmericanSafetyEquipmentCorp.v.J.PMaguire&Co.(1968):反托拉斯法项下的争议不宜通过仲裁方式解决。M

55、utsubishiMotorsCorp.v.SolerChrysler-Plymouth(1985):合谋划分市场的违反反托拉斯法的请求权项可以通过仲裁的方式解决。LabordisputeArbitrableunlessthelawprovidesotherwiseSection5ChineseLegislationandPracticesConcerningtheArbitrableSubject-MatterPracticesinChinaArbitrationLawArt.2SecuritiesIntellectualpropertiesLabordisputes本章教学要点在国际商事交

56、易案件中，可仲裁事项涉及各国对竞争政策方面的考虑，每一个国家的立法者和法院都必须均衡的考虑到公共利益的重要性，将涉及国家公共利益的事项问题留给本国法院解决。2在国际商事争议中，某些事项能否通过仲裁的方式解决，归根结底取决于各相关国家在不同的时期内对这些问题所实施的经济和社会政策的不同，适用不同国家的法律对这些问题做出判断，可能得出不同的结论。3仲裁协议经国家或国有企业签署后，不得再以其本国法上的禁止性规定为由，否认其所签署的仲裁协议的有效性。4鉴于可仲裁事项与一国的社会公共利益有着极为密切的联系，因而在适用法律的问题上，无论是对仲裁协议有效性的认定，还是仲裁裁决的承认与执行，法院只适用法院地法

57、。而仲裁庭在决定其所审理的仲裁案件的可仲裁性问题上，一般按照合同或仲裁协议的适用法律作出决定。5中国现行仲裁立法对于可以通过仲裁解决的争议与不能通过仲裁解决的争议作出了明确的规定。在涉及证券交易、知识产权等争议中，在一定的条件下，也可以通过仲裁的方式解决。但在我国境内发生的劳动争议，实行强制仲裁，而不需要当事人之间订有仲裁协议。QuestionsandCommentsIninternationalbusinesstransactions,mattersrelatingtopublicpolicycouldnotbearbitrated.Itisuptothenationalcourtsthat

58、decidethearbitabilityofaparticularmatter.Duetodifferenteconomicandsocialpolicyimplementedbydifferentstates,orthesamestateindifferentperiods,thesamesubject-mattercouldbesettledbyarbitrationinonecountryandcouldnotbedoneintheothercountry,oritcouldnotbesettledincertainperiodandcouldbedoneinotherperiodin

59、thesamecountry.Thestateortheenterprisescontrolledbythestate,whensignedarbitrationagreementwithotherprivateparties,couldnotclaimitsincapacitybyreferringtoitsownlaw.Inpractice,theapplicablelawtodeterminetheabitrabilityofthesubject-matteristhelawofthecountrywherethesaidlitigationiscarriedout.Thepresent

60、Chineselawprovidesclearlymattersthatcanbesettledbyarbitrationandthosenot.Themattersarbitratedshouldbebasedonthescopeofhearbitrationagreement.CHAPTER5ARBITRALTRIBUNALANDITSJURISDICTION第五章仲裁庭及其管辖权限课时：2本章的教学目的是要求学生理解并掌握仲裁庭的组成及其特点、仲裁庭自裁管辖原则仲裁庭的管辖权限、仲裁庭的权利与义务，以及我国相关立法与实践。案例分析：浙江诸暨外贸诉香港恺威（第110页）Legislatio