举证责任论文：浅析网络购物纠纷中的举证责任制度

1、举证责任论文：浅析网络购物纠纷中的举证责任制度【中文摘要】网络购物在经历了几年的飞速发展后，呈现了一种 异常繁荣的景象。然而繁荣的背后却是缺乏法律监管所带来的纠纷不 断，以及纠纷难断。由于网络购物的特殊性，在买卖双方纠纷发生之后, 如何分配举证责任是解决纠纷的重要环节。笔者认为应遵循三个方面 的原则对网络购物纠纷中的举证责任进行完善。首先，原告和被告所 负担的举证责任应当是相当的。由于担负举证责任的程度与其所应当 承受的败诉风险是对应的，又根据程序正义的要求，对于原告和被告 之间所承受的举证责任应当做出合理的分配，不应当将全部的举证责 任强加给一方，因为这样就意味着他也必须要承受相应程度的败诉

2、风 险，使其完全的处于诉讼地位中的劣势，而在诉讼过程中很难胜诉。其 次，应当根据当事人的举证能力、条件及其所处的地位来分配证明责 任，使更有能力，更有条件的一方负有的举证责任，这样更有利于收集 到的证据，从而能够证明到更接近于案件的客观真实，而对于缺乏条 件和证明能力较弱的一方，减轻其证明的负担，只有根据当事人的举 证能力和条件及其所处的地位类分配证明责任,才能更好的维护诉讼 的程序正义。最后，应当从诉讼经济和效率方面着手来规范举证责任 的分配。作为民事诉讼制度的内在要求的诉讼经济又称诉讼节约，它 主要解决诉讼程序的效率问题。本文分为三个部分，第一部分分析我 国网络购物纠纷中举证责任分配的立法

3、现状，有哪些法律问题和现实 问题阻碍着网络购物纠纷的解决。第二部分介绍了美国以及欧盟这样 的发达市场经济体制国家关于网络购物责任的相关立法情况,对我国 这方面问题如何规定是一个参考。第三部分重点阐述了笔者关于网络 购物特殊环境下如何分配双方举证责任,以及第三方在纠纷中所应该 扮演何种举证角色。【英文摘要】Online shopping has experienced several years of rapid development, presented an unusual prosperity. However, it is behind the prosperity brought a

4、bout by the lack of legal and regulatory disputes continued, and disputes too hard. The particularity of online shopping because, after a dispute in the buyers and sellers, how to allocate the burden of proof is an important part of resolving disputes. I think we should follow the principles of the

5、three aspects of online shopping disputes to perfect the burden of proof. First, the burden of the plaintiff and the defendant the burden of proof should be considerable. Bear the burden of proof because the degree of its fair share of the corresponding risk losing, but also according to the require

6、ments of procedural justice, between the plaintiff and the defendant should bear the burden of proof to make a reasonable allocation, not all of the burden of proof should be imposed to the party because it means that he must bear the corresponding risk level of losing it completely in the inferior

7、position in the litigation, but hard to win during the proceedings. Secondly, the burden of proof should be based on ability of the parties, the condition and the status to allocate the burden of proof, so that more capable, better equipped to bear more of the party the burden of proof, so that is m

8、ore conducive to gather more evidence, which can prove to the case closer to objective truth, and the lack of conditions for the weaker side and proved to reduce the burden of the proof, only evidence of the parties, ability and class conditions and the status assigned the burden of proof to better

9、maintenance of procedural justice proceedings. Finally, it should be from the aspects of economy and efficiency actions to regulate the allocation of the burden of proof. The inherent requirements of a civil litigation system, also known as action to save the economy, which mainly address the effici

10、ency of the proceedings.This article is divided into three parts, the first analysis of the online shopping disputes legislative status of the burden of proof allocation, there are legal and practical issues which impede online shopping disputes. The second part describes the United States and the E

11、uropean Union such a developed market economy country on the responsibility of the relevant legislation online shopping situation, this aspect of our country how to provide a reference. The third part focuseson the special paper on the online shopping environment, how to allocate both the burden of

12、proof, and the third party in the dispute in the evidence should play what role.【关键词】举证责任 举证责任分配网络购物【英文关键词】burden of proof allocation of theburden of proof online shopping【目录】浅析网络购物纠纷中的举证责任制度摘要3-4 ABSTRACT 4-5一、我国网络购物纠纷中举证责任的问题分析8-15（一）立法规定的缺失和不足8-9（二）网络购物纠纷处理中的问题9-11（三）网络购物纠纷中的举证困境11-121.存在网络购物交易的证

13、明11-122.违反合同约定的证明12（四）第三方对网络购物纠纷中举证责任的影响12-15 二、网络购物纠纷中举证责任的外国法借鉴15-19（一）美国关于网络购物纠纷解决的相关立法16（二）欧盟关于网络购物纠纷解决的相关立法19三、我国网络购物纠纷中举证责任制度的构建19-29（一）举证责任理论19-21（二）卖方举证责任21-241.卖方应就是否尽到善意告知义务举证212.卖方应对是否真实交付商品举证21-233.卖方应就是否转移商品所有权举证23-244.卖方应就是否履行与物流公司协调的义务举证24（三）买方举证责任24-261.买方应就是否支付货款举证24-252.买方应就是否按合同约定的时间、地点和方式接收商品举证253.买方应就是否验收