欧共体法律体系研究(24)法学理论(1)

1、欧共体法律体系研究(24)法学理论论文(1)47 参见Case C-192/89 Sevince (1990) ECR I-3461; Case C-188/91 Deutsche Shell (1993) ECR I-363.48 参见Opinion 1/76 Laying-up Fund (1977) ECR 741.49 进一步参考Schermers, A Typology of Mixed Agreements, in OKeeffe and Schermers, n.1.50 参见Opinion 1/78 Natural Rubber (1979) ECR 2971.51 Case

2、C-316/91 (1994) ECR I-625.52 例如，Case 104/81 Hauptzollamt Mainz v. Kupferberg (1982) ECR 3641.53 参见M. Hilf, “The application of GATT Within the Member States of the European Community, with Special Reference to the Federal Republic of Germany, The European Community and GATT 153 (1986), P161.54 参见曾令良

3、， ?欧洲共同体与现代国际法?1992，P260。55 Ernist-Ulrich Petersmann, the EEC as a GATT MemberLegal Conflicts between GATT Law and EC Law, in Minhard Hilf, European Community and GATT, 1986, P24.56 Joined Cases 51-54/71 International Fruit Company and Others v. Produktschap voor Groenten Fruit, (1971) ECR 1107.57 C

4、ouncil Decision 94/800 concerning the conclusion on behalf of the EC as regards matters within its competence of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations(1986-94), (1994) OJ L 336/1.58 Opinion 1/94 WTO (1994) ECR I-5267.59 参见D.Lasok and J.W.Bridge, Law and Insti

5、tutions of the European Communities, (5th edtion, 1991),P263.60 参见J.H.A.van Loon, “The Hague Conventions on Private International Law, in F.G.Jacobs and S.Roberts, The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law(1987), P229.61 参见Case 181/73 R. V. Haegeman v. Belgium State, (1974), ECR 449.62 参见Case 21-24/72

6、Int. Fruit Company (1972) ECR 1219; Jointed Cases 290291/81, ECR (1983),847.63 参见Kees Jan Kuilwijk, “The European Court of Justice and the GATT Dilemma, P105.64 Case 70/87 Fediol III (1989) ECR 1825. 1984年欧共体理事会通过了对抗美国1974年贸易法301条款的2681/84号条例又称“新商业政策工具，根据该条例，在采取涉及关贸总协定缔约方的任何单边贸易措施之前，欧共体必须援用关贸总协定争端解决

7、机制。65 中国的一些学者也认为，在这个案件中，法院判决个人可以根据GATT条款对欧洲委员会起诉。笔者这是一种错误的理解。见曾令良、陈卫东，“从欧共体看21实际区域一体化对多边贸易体制的影响。66 Case C-69/89 Nakajima(1991) ECR I-2069.67 Case C-280/93 Germany v. Council ( Banana Market Organization) (1994) ECR I-4973.68 参见Kees Jan Kuilwijk, The European Court of Justice and the GATT Dilemma, P1

8、60.69 COM(94) 414 final. 关于这个问题，参见C.W.A. Timmermans, “The Implemantion of the Uruguay Round by the EC, in: J.H.J. Bourgeois, F. Berrod and E.Gippini Fournier, The Urguay Round Results: A European Lawyers Perspective 501 (1995), P506.2170 参见曾令良、陈卫东，“从欧共体看21世纪区域一体化对多边贸易体制的影响。71 参见M. Maresceau, “The GATT in the Case-Law of the European Court of Justice, in: M. Hilf, F. G. Jacobs and E. U. Petersmann, The European Community and GATT 107(1986).7