




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、524Acta Physiologica Sinica, August 25, 2007, 59 (4): 524-533Research PaperDNA-dependent protein kinase activity and radiosensitivity of nasopharyngealcarcinoma cell lines CNE1/CNE2HE Yu-Xiang1,2, ZHONG Ping-Ping1,2, YAN Shan-Shan1,2, LIU Li1,2, SHI Hong-Liu1, ZENG Mu-Sheng1, XIA Yun-Fei1,2,*1State
2、Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China; 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510060, ChinaAbstract: The present study investigated the relationship between DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and radiosensitivity ofnasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)
3、cell lines. The dose-survival relationship for NPC cell lines, CNE1 and CNE2, was analyzed usingclonogenic formation assay, the activity of DNA-PK of the two cell lines was measured using the Signa TECT DNA-PK assay kit, andthe localization and expression of Kus (a heterodimer) and DNA-PKcs protein
4、in CNE1 and CNE2 before irradiation and 15 min, 1 h,6 h, 12 h, 24 h after 4 Gy irradiation were analyzed by immunofluorescence, laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM) and Westernblot. The results showed that the surviving fraction of CNE1 was higher than that of CNE2 at each dose. The DNA-PK acti
5、vity ofCNE1 was also significantly higher than that of CNE2 before and after irradiation (P<0.05), while the expression of total Ku70/Ku80in CNE1 and CNE2 had no significant difference. Increasing translocation of Ku70 and Ku80 from the cytoplasm to the nuclei in thetwo cell lines was observed wi
6、th increase of irradiation time as detected by Western blot, and the immunofluorescence of the DNA-PKcomplex subunits showed greater nuclear translocation in CNE1 than CNE2 after irradiation. The results suggest that the relativelyhigher radio-resistance of CNE1 correlates with the higher activity o
7、f DNA-PK as compared to that of more radiosensitive CNE2 (orlower radio-resistance) before and after irradiation. Thus, DNA-PK activity may be a useful predictor of radiosensitivity of NPC.Key words: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; CNE1/CNE2; radiosensitivity; DNA-dependent protein kinaseDNA-PK的活性与鼻咽癌细胞株C
8、NE1/CNE2放射敏感性的关系贺玉香1,2,仲萍萍1,2,严珊珊1,2,刘 莉1,2,史弘流1,曾木圣1,夏云飞1,2,*中山大学肿瘤医院1华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室;2肿瘤防治中心放射生物室,广州 510060摘 要:本文主要研究DNA依赖的蛋白激酶(DNA-dependent protein kinase, DNA-PK)与鼻咽癌细胞放射敏感性之间的关系。克隆形成实验分析鼻咽癌细胞CNE1/CNE2的剂量存活曲线,Signa TECT DNA-PK 试剂盒检测DNA-PK活性,免疫荧光及激光显微共聚焦分析放疗前及放疗后15 min、1 h、6 h、12 h和24 h CNE1/CNE2 细
9、胞中Kus及DNA-PKcs的亚细胞定位,Western blot分析两株细胞中Kus蛋白的表达。结果显示:CNE1细胞在每个剂量点的存活分数均高于CNE2 细胞;同时发现放疗前后CNE1细胞中的DNA-PK活性也均高于CNE2细胞,但两株细胞中Ku70/Ku80蛋白表达无明显差异;放疗可使DNA-PK活性增加,且各个检测时间点CNE1细胞增加的幅度大于CNE2细胞;DNA-PK亚基可同时定位于胞浆和胞核,但主要位于胞核,细胞照射后Ku70、Ku80和DNA-PKcs从胞浆转运到胞核。结果表明:DNA-PK活性更高可能是CNE1细胞较CNE2细胞更能抵抗放射的原因之一;放疗所致DNA-PK活性
10、增高可能与DNA-PK亚基从胞浆转运到胞核有关,而与Ku蛋白表达的总量无关。关键词:鼻咽癌;CNE1/CNE2;放射敏感性;DNA依赖的蛋白激酶中图分类号:R739.63Received 2007-05-02 Accepted 2007-07-03This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30070237) and National High Technology Researchand Development Program of China (No. 2006AA02Z4
11、B4).*Corresponding author. Tel: +86-20-87343545; Fax: +86-20-87343392; E-mail: xiayunfeiHE Yu-Xiang et al: DNA-PK and Radiosensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma525Radiotherapy is a major treatment modality for nasopha-ryngeal carcinoma (NPC), and about 60% of five-yearsurvival rate can be obtained
12、 by radiotherapy alone. Ra-dioresistance of NPC cells to ionizing radiation is one ofthe main reasons for the failure of the therapy1. Therefore,understanding the mechanism underlying the radioresis-tance of NPC cells can help us develop new radiosensitizingapproaches to improve the treatment effica
13、cy.It has been established that radiosensitivity is related toDNA double-strand break (DSB) repair system. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which plays an im-portant role in DSB repair system, is a component trimetricenzyme consisting of a 465- kDa serine/threonine proteinkinase catalytic subu
14、nit (DNA-PKcs), and a heterodimercalled Ku, which comprises 70-kDa (Ku70) and 80/86-kDa (Ku80) proteins as a regulatory subunit2-4. The de-fects in DNA-PK components will lead to decreased DNA-PKactivity and less DSB repair, thus increased radiosensitivity.For example, the MO59J cell line with defic
15、iency in DNA-PKcs was 10-fold or more radiosensitive than the MO59Kcell line with normal expression of DNA-PKcs5. Defi-ciency in DNA-PKcs expression and DNA repair has alsobeen reported leading to increased radiation sensitivity inthe BALB/c mouse6. Ku, which functions as an initiatorof NHEJ (non-ho
16、mology end joining), is able to bind DNA-DSBs and recruit DNA-PKcs and other repair factors. Theimportance of Ku in the response to ionizing radiation isapparent from the extremely increased radiation sensitivityalong with deficiency in DSB repair whenever there aremutations in one of its subunits7,
17、8. Furthermore, severalstudies reported that antisense nucleotide targeted to eitherKu80, Ku70 or DNA-PKcs messenger RNA could sensi-tize human fibroblasts, M059K malignant glioma cells, andhuman non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines toionizing radiation9-11. Some researchers have tried to u
18、seKu as a predictor of radiosensitivity and the prognosis ofmalignant diseases, such as rectal carcinoma, oropha-ryngeal, hypopharyngeal carcinomas and carcinomaof the cervix12-14. The use of DNA-PKcs as a predictorfor chemoradiation therapeutic sensitivity, such as eso-phageal cancer has also been
19、proposed15. Lee et al.16 studiedthe levels of immunoreactivity for Ku70 and DNA-PKcs inpretreatment biopsy specimens from 66 patients with NPCwho were then treated with radiotherapy alone or withconcurrent chemotherapy. Their results showed that thelevel of Ku70 expression could be used as a molecul
20、armarker to predict the response to radiotherapy in NPCpatients. However, the relationship between DNA-PK ex-pression/activity and radiosensitvity has not been carriedout under well-controlled laboratory condition for NPC celllines exhibiting different degree of radiosensitivity.The NPC cell lines,
21、CNE1 and CNE2, which were bothderived from squamous cell carcinoma17,18, exhibit promi-nent difference in morphology and biological behavior. Ithas been demonstrated that CNE2 is more radiosensitivethan CNE119-21. Wang et al.22 found that the expressionof ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutant), a protei
22、n of DNArepair, was higher in CNE1 than that in CNE2, and thus itwas suggested that ATM was one of the factors leading toradioresistance in CNE1. Since DNA-PK belongs tophosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) family as well as ATM,it is highly possible that DNA-PK be one of the factorsaffecting radiose
23、nsitivity of NPC cell lines CNE1 and CNE2.Therefore, we undertook the present study to investigatethe relationship between DNA-PK expression/activity andthe known radiosensitivity of NPC cell lines.1 MATERIALS AND METHODS1.1 Cell lines and culture conditionsCNE1 and CNE2 were provided by the Cancer
24、Center ofSun Yat-sen University. All cells were routinely cultured inRPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal calf se-rum (FCS) and antibiotics including 100 U of penicillin permL and 100 g of streptomycin per mL. All incubationswere performed at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of5% CO2 and
25、 95% air.1.2 Methods of irradiationExponentially growing cells were treated with 0.25% trypsinto get cell suspension. Then the cells were irradiated withX ionizing radiation of 4 Gy, and with irradiation rate of104.93 cGy/min at 210 kV and 12 mA. The source-to-target distance was 40 cm and the irrad
26、iation field was 10cm×15 cm with 0.25 Cu filter and 0.52 Cu half valueslayer. Cells were harvested to be used for laser scanningconfocal microscope (LSCM), Western blot analysis andDNA-PK activity assay 0, 15 min, 1 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 hafter irradiation of 4 Gy X-ray.1.3 Clonogenic survival as
27、sayCells were grown in culture flasks to mid-logarithmic phasewith about 60% confluence and fed fresh medium on theday before the experiment. Cells were treated with 0.25%trypsin, single-cell suspensions were prepared, and cellnumber was counted using a hemocytometer. Cells werethen seeded in varyin
28、g amounts onto 60-mm culture dishesalong with nutrient medium. The latter were respectivelyirradiated with different single dose ranging from 0 to 800526cGy. This was done in triplicate at each dose including 0,0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy. Immediately after irradiation, thetreated cells were incubated
29、under the above-describedgrowing condition for 9-14 d until colonies appear. Thesurviving clones were fixed with methanol and stained withcrystal violet. Clones only having a minimum of 50 viablecells were scored. The experiments were repeated at leastthree times to get an average value. All surviva
30、l data wereanalyzed using survival curve program on a microcom-puter with Sigma-Plot software in the Department of Ra-diation Oncology at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.The linear quadratic model was applied to analyze the sur-vival curve data and then the parameters plating efficiency(PE), ,
31、, survival fraction of 2 Gy (SF2), mean inacti-vation dose (MID) were calculated.1.4 ImmunofluorescenceCells were seeded (5×105 cells) in 40-mm dishes with co-verslips (Fisher Scientific), cultured in RPMI 1640 mediawith 10% FCS at 37 oC overnight. Then cells were fixed inpre-cold 10% paraforma
32、ldehyde for 30 min at designedmeasuring time (0, 15 min, 1 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h) afterirradiation of 4 Gy ionizing radiation, permeabilized in0.5% Triton X-100/PBS for 15 min. After an additionalwash in PBS, the coverslips crawled with cells wereblocked in 10% goat serum in PBS for 30 min, and incu
33、-bated with anti-Ku70, anti-Ku80 or anti-DNA-PKcs anti-bodies (BD Biosciences) diluted in 10% goat serum/PBS(1:100 dilution) overnight at 4 oC. After rinsed in PBS for 5min, coverslips were incubated with FITC-conjugated goatanti-mouse IgG (DAKO) for 1 h in dark and wet box, andincubated with 0.5 g/
34、mL DAPI (Sigma) to stained thenuclei for 2 min, rinsed in ddH2O for 5 min, mounted with80% glycerol/PBS. Confocal images were obtained usinga confocal laser microscopy system (Zeiss). HeLa cell wasthe positive control, and the group with PBS replacing theprimary antibody during incubation was regard
35、ed as nega-tive control.1.5 Western blot analysisSample preparation: the control cells and 4 Gy-irradiatedcells were scraped from the dishes in PBS at 0, 15 min, 1 h,6 h, 12 h and 24 h after irradiation. The collected cellswere centrifuged at 4 °C and then the cell pellets werelysed in pre-cool
36、ed radio immunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer(Upstate, Ltd.). The swollen cells were disrupted by incu-bation on ice for 30 min. The resulting suspension wascentrifuged at 15 000 r/min for 10 min at 4 °C, and theclear supernatants were the whole extracts of the cells,stored at -80 °C before u
37、se. Protein concentrations wereActa Physiologica Sinica, August 25, 2007, 59 (4): 524-533determined with BCA protein assay kit (Piearce, Ltd.).Nuclear-Cytosol Extraction Kit was used to prepare nuclearand cytoplasmic extracts of the cells.Electrophoresis and transference of the protein: the pro-tein
38、 extracts (10 µg of total cell extracts, 15 µg of nuclearor cytoplasmic extracts) were separated on 10% polyacry-lamide gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride mem-branes (Roche Corporation). The membranes were blockedwith 5% degreased milk for 1 h at room temperature orovernight
39、at 4 °C. Then, the membranes were incubatedwith the primary antibodies (all were from Santa CruzBiotechnology, CA) diluted in Blocking buffer for 3 h atroom temperature at the following dilutions: 1:1 000 forKu70 and Ku80, 1:10 000 for GAPDH, respectively. Afterthat, the membranes were washed a
40、nd proteins were de-tected by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondaryantibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) (1: 2 000) andenhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham PharmaciaBiotech). Equal loading of extracts was confirmed by mea-suring GAPDH expression. The bands were quantified bydensitometric ana
41、lysis using an apparatus JVC ky-F3OB3-CCD (Japan) with automatic image analysis system. Weintroduced the integral optical density (IOD), which wasproduced by the area of the band multiply the mean lightdensitometer as a last index.The experiments of Western blot, which was designedto detect the expr
42、ession of Kus of CNE1 and CNE2 beforeand after irradiation, were done in triplicate. The bandsnormalized to the expression level of HSP70 were mea-sured for its IOD and the results were described withmeans±SEM. The mean value between two groups wascompared using the Student t-test.1.6 DNA-PK ac
43、tivity assayKinase assays were performed as described previously23-25using the Signa TECT DNA-PK assay kit according to themanufacturers protocol (Promega Inc.), with the follow-ing modification: Cell extracts were prepared with ice-coldlow salt (LS) buffer (50 mmol/L NaF, 20 mmol/L HEPES/NaOH at pH
44、 7.6, 450 mmol/L NaCl, 25% glycerol, 0.2mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, 0.5 mmol/L PMSF, 1µg/mL aprotinin, 1 mg/mL trypsin inhibitor, 1 µg/mLleupeptin, 0.5% NP-40). In order to remove endogenousDNA, the aliquot cell extracts (include 100 µg protein)were mixed with 20 µg dsDNA-cellul
45、ose (Sigma Co.) in atotal volume of 100 µL Buffer Z (25 mmol/L HEPES/KOHat pH 7.6, 12.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 20% glycerol, 0.1% NP-40,1 mmol/L DTT and 50 mmol/L KCl). The mixture wasincubated at 4 °C for at least 20 h with continuous shaking.And kinase assays were conducted in the following steps
46、.HE Yu-Xiang et al: DNA-PK and Radiosensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma527Prepare the enzyme dilution buffer for the experimentalgroup including DNA-PK biotinylated peptide substrate andfor the control group without DNA-PK biotinylated pep-tide substrate, and djust the final reaction volume to 2
47、5 µLwith deionized water. After incubating at 30 oC for 5 min,add 15.0 µL enzyme dilution buffer to each sample (25.0µg protein of each) which involved 0.05 µL radioactivityisotope -32PATP (7 000 Ci/mmol; ICN Radiochemical)to activate the reaction. Terminate it by adding 12.5
48、81;L ofterminate buffer to each reaction and mix well. Spot 10.0µL of each terminated reaction onto a SAM2 biotin capturemembrane. After all samples have been spotted, wash theSAM2 membrane, and the excess free -32PATP andnonbiotinylated proteins were removed via a simple wash-ing procedure. Af
49、ter washing, the radioactivity was deter-mined in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman LS6000).Calculation of DNA-PK activity by using the formula of-fered in the kit.1.7 Statistical methodData were expressed as the means±SEM. Results wereanalyzed for significant differences using SPSS proce
50、dures(version 10.0) and Students t tests (Sigma Plot 6.0). Re-sults were considered significant at P<0.05.Fig.1. Clonogenic cell survival curves for CNE1 and CNE2 cell lineswere generated after exposure to 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy of ionizingradiation.2 RESULTS2.1 Radiation dose-survival curve
51、 and radiobiologi-cal parametersRadiation dose-survival curve and radiobiological para-meters were shown in Fig.1 and Table 1. Obviously, thesurvival curve of CNE1 was smoother than that of CNE2,indicating higher survival (or more resistance). Also, value in linear portion of CNE1 was smaller than t
52、hat ofCNE2 and its MID was almost twice of that of CNE2. Thedata suggested that the CNE2 is intrinsically much moreradiosensitive than CNE1.2.2 DNA-PK activityThe DNA-PK activity was measured by an assay kit. Assummarized in Fig.2, before irradiation the DNA-PK ac-tivity of CNE1 was higher than that
53、 of CNE2 (4.14±0.69versus 0.41±0.26, P<0.05). The DNA-PK activity of bothFig.2. Changes of DNA-PK activity in CNE1/CNE2 cells before andafter irradiation. A: Relationship between the DNA-PK activity andquantity of cell extracts in CNE1/CNE2 cells. Within 12.5-150 g ofcell extracts, the
54、DNA-PK activity linear increased with the increaseof protein quantity. The cumulative means±SEM were shown (n=3).B: Changes of DNA-PK activity in CNE1/CNE2 cells before andafter 4 Gy X-ray exposure at different time points. The resultsshown for DNA-PK activity were the means±SEM of three i
55、nde-pendent experiments. *P<0.05 vs CNE2.Table 1. Dose-survival curve parameters of CNE1 and CNE2Cell line PE (%) SF2 read (%) SEM (%) SF2est (%) (Gy-1) (Gy-1) MID (Gy)CNE1CNE2929037162.831.4154170.1060.8100.1100.0852.3451.111PE, plating effciency; SF2, survival fraction of 2 Gy; MID, mean inacti
56、vation dose.528Acta Physiologica Sinica, August 25, 2007, 59 (4): 524-533cell lines increased 1 h after irradiation, while the increasein DNA-PK activity in CNE1 was drastically higher thanthat of CNE2 (P<0.05). Similar results were obtained atall time points examined (Fig.2B).2.3 Protein express
57、ions of Ku70 and Ku80The protein levels of Ku70 and Ku80 were detected byWestern blot in both CNE1 and CNE2 cell lines before andafter 4 Gy irradiation (Fig.3). The semi-quantified assay ofthe protein bands showed that the basic expressions ofKu70 and Ku80 in the two cell lines before irradiation we
58、renot significantly different. With 4 Gy irradiation, the Kuprotein expression of the total extracts in the two cell linesremained stable, but the levels of Ku of the nuclei extractswere obviously higher than that of pre-irradiation. Notably,the expression of Ku70 in the cytoplasm after irradiationf
59、or over 6 h appeared to be consistently lower in CNE1Fig.3. Expression of Ku70 and Ku80 proteins before and after irradiation by Western blot.(Continued on next page)HE Yu-Xiang et al: DNA-PK and Radiosensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Continued from previous page) 529 Fig.4. Comparison of time-dependent nuclear translocation of DNA-PK subunits after irradiation between CNE1 and CNE2 by immunofluorescent staini
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 土地无偿占用合同范本
- 商务综合服务合同范本
- 1995用工合同范本
- 固体废料收购合同范本
- 合伙建筑施工合同范例
- 吉安农村建房包工合同范本
- 土地出买合同范本
- 商家发货合同范本
- 商品混泥土合同范本
- 圆木采购合同范例
- 小学生春耕教学课件
- 2024年南信语文数学试卷(含答案)
- 2025年个人投资合同电子版模板
- 车辆挂靠协议书
- 2025年湖南交通职业技术学院单招职业适应性测试题库1套
- 2017年公务员多省联考《申论》真题(吉林甲级卷)及参考答案(含详细解析)
- 一年级下册健康成长教案
- 电力系统老化问题及其隐患解决方案研究报告发布
- 2025年江西建设职业技术学院高职单招职业适应性测试近5年常考版参考题库含答案解析
- 盐酸安非他酮合成工艺优化-洞察分析
- 2021年考研英语一真题
评论
0/150
提交评论