高脂血症的一级预防和二级预防-ppt课件_第1页
高脂血症的一级预防和二级预防-ppt课件_第2页
高脂血症的一级预防和二级预防-ppt课件_第3页
高脂血症的一级预防和二级预防-ppt课件_第4页
高脂血症的一级预防和二级预防-ppt课件_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩30页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、68%18%14%020406080PCICABG-30-33-29-28-22-40-30-20-100LDL-CStrokeTotalmortality% *Confidence interval (CI) not reported.95% CI, 14%-41%.95% CI, 16%-37%.95% CI, 12%-31%.Hebert PR et al. JAMA. 1997;278:313-321.Nonfatal/fatal CHDCVDmortalityPyrl K et al. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:614-620.0.500.600.700.800.

2、901.000.001.002.003.004.005.000123456Proportionwithoutmajor CHD eventYr since randomization- P=0.002- P=0.0001Diabetic, simvastatinDiabetic, placeboNondiabetic, simvastatinNondiabetic, placebo32%55%Haffner SM et al. Diabetes. 1998;(suppl 1):A54. Abstract.-46-56-40-43-60-50-40-30-20-100Totalmortality

3、CoronarymortalityMajorcoronaryeventsRevas-culari-zations inevents(%)P=0.005P=0.001P=0.010Acute coronaryeventNo history of CADAcute Coronary Syndromest=0Randomization:CARE - 320 moLIPID - 336 moRandomization:6 moStable CAD71249-275-16-50-40-30-20-1001020TCHDL-CTGPlaceboAtorvastatin 80 mg% Data from S

4、chwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1718.Additional data courtesy of GG Schwartz.unstable anginaor nonQ-wave MI3,086randomized2496 hafter admissionFollowed 16 weeks0510150481216Time since randomization (wk)Cumulativeincidence(%)RR = 0.84(95% CI, 0.70-1.00) P = 0.048AtorvastatinPlacebo17.414.8*Deat

5、h (any cause), nonfatal MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, recurrent symptomatic myocardial ischemia with objective evidence requiring emergency rehospitalization.Schwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1700.751.001.252.00Relative riskDeathNonfatal MIResuscitatedcardiac arrestNo. (%) of event

6、s*Adapted from Schwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1718.0.00.51.01.52.00481216Time since randomization (wk)RR = 0.50(95% CI, 0.26-0.99)P = 0.045Placebo1.6Cumulativeincidence(%)Data from Schwartz GG et al. JAMA. 2001;285:1711-1718.19,599 men and women 80 yo discharged post AMI, 58 Swedish Hospital

7、s, 1995-19985528 (28%) statin rx vs 14071 (72%) no statin rx, highest hospital rates of use 48%; lowest 12% Stenestrand JAMA 2001;285;430-436RR 0.75 (0.63-0.89)P=0.001 25% Risk ReductionHeeschen C et al. Circulation. 2002;105:1446-1452.051015202530181614121086420Follow-up (day)Event rates (%) Statin

8、s discontinuedNo statinsStatins continued507090110130150170190210TNT 80mgTNT 10 mgCARE-SLIPID-S4S-SCARE-PLIPID-PTNT Entry4S-PAVERT 80mg: LDL=77 mg/dL13.4% Event RateIIIa IIbIII=ACC/AHA Practice GuidelinesACC/ AHAUA/ NSTEMIGuidelines 2002Risk ratio and 95% CISTATINPLACEBOBaselinefeature(10269)(10267)

9、STATIN betterSTATIN worseSTATIN worsePrevious MI10071255Other CHD (not MI)452597No prior CHD CVD182215PVD332427Diabetes279369SE 2.6(2P0.00001)1.01.21.4Risk ratio and 95% CISTATINPLACEBOBaselinefeature(10269)(10267)STATIN betterSTATIN worseLDL (mg/dl)Hetc22= 0.8 100 130670881 13010875ALL PAT

10、IENTS20422606(19.9%)(25.4%)SE 2.6(2P0.00001)1.01.21.4(2.6 mmol/l)(3.4 mmol/l)01020300123456Proportion withevent (%)Years of follow-upBenefit/1,000 (SE)5 (3)20 (4)35 (5)46 (5)54 (7)60 (18)Logrank P 0.0001PlaceboSimvastatin 2002 Thomson Professional Postgraduate SHPS Col

11、laborative Group. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.ARR=absolute risk reduction; NNT=number needed to treat. 2002 Thomson Professional Postgraduate SHPS Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2002;360:7-22.HPS enrolled high-risk primary- and secondary-prevention patients.HPS. Lancet. 2002;360:7. Dow

12、ns. JAMA. 1998;279:1615.LIPID. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1349. Sacks. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1001. 4S. Lancet. 1995;345:1274. Shepherd. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1301. % with CHD eventMean LDL-C level at follow-up (mg/dL)05101520253090110130150170190210CARE-RxLIPID-Rx4S-RxCARE-PILIPID-PI4S-PI2 Prevention1

13、 PreventionWOSCOPS-PIWOSCOPS-RxAFCAPS-RxAFCAPS-PIHPS-PlHPS-RxHPS-RxHPS-Plw/revasc+stroke CHD onlyPI=placebo Rx=treatment70 2002 Thomson Professional Postgraduate SDowns JR, et al. JAMA. 1998;279:1615.012345678LovastatinPlacebo 34 403539HDL-C Tertile (mg/dL)Events, % *P0.01; P=0

14、.006; P=0.05P=placebo group; Rx=treated group.Presented by HB Rubins at the 71st annual AHA Scientific Sessions; Dallas, Texas.Subjects: 2,531 menAge: 74 (avg 64) yrMean baseline LDL-C: 111 mg/dLMean baseline HDL-C: 32 mg/dLMean baseline TG: 161 mg/dLDuration: 7 yrIntervention: Gemfibrozil 600 mg bid47.5-24.5-22-21-27-10-30-25-20-15-10-50510%+*LDL-CHDL-CTGNonfatal MI/CHD deathCHDdeathAll-causemortalityStrokeBrown BG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1521.414.3051015202589%Reduction*P .05 vs placeboPlacebo S + NAVS + N + AVPearson TA, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:459.04080P

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论