版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、100:00:03,320 - 00:00:06,140funding for this program is provided by.200:00:07,760 - 00:00:09,670additional funding provided by.300:00:33,600 - 00:00:35,100this is a course about justice400:00:35,100 - 00:00:37,200and we begin with a story.500:00:37,600 - 00:00:40,080suppose youre the driverof a trol
2、ley car,600:00:40,320 - 00:00:42,590and your trolley caris hurtling down the track700:00:42,760 - 00:00:46,040at 60 miles an hour.and at the end of the track800:00:46,140 - 00:00:49,020you notice five workersworking on the track.900:00:49,530 - 00:00:51,940you try to stopbut you cant,1000:00:52,169
3、- 00:00:53,660your brakes dont work.1100:00:53,760 - 00:00:56,250you feel desperatebecause you know1200:00:56,519 - 00:00:59,050that if you crashinto these five workers,1300:00:59,199 - 00:01:01,500they will all die.1400:01:01,709 - 00:01:03,730lets assumeyou know that for sure.1500:01:04,890 - 00:0
4、1:08,260and so you feel helplessuntil you notice1600:01:08,480 - 00:01:10,800that there is,off to the right,1700:01:11,320 - 00:01:14,930a side track and at the endof that track,1800:01:15,500 - 00:01:19,000there is one workerworking on the track.1900:01:19,160 - 00:01:24,540your steering wheel work
5、s,so you can turn the trolley car,2000:01:24,640 - 00:01:27,960if you want to,onto the side track2100:01:28,950 - 00:01:32,380killing the one but sparing the five.2200:01:33,500 - 00:01:38,200heres our first question:whats the right thing to do?2300:01:39,000 - 00:01:41,900what would you do?lets tak
6、e a poll.2400:01:42,690 - 00:01:46,530how many would turnthe trolley car2500:01:46,690 - 00:01:50,460onto the side track?raise your hands.2600:01:52,309 - 00:01:56,010how many wouldnt?how many would go straight ahead?2700:01:57,960 - 00:02:01,260keep your hands up those of youwho would go straight a
7、head.2800:02:04,419 - 00:02:05,970a handful of people would,2900:02:06,119 - 00:02:07,980the vast majority would turn.3000:02:08,440 - 00:02:10,740lets hear first,now we need to begin3100:02:11,030 - 00:02:13,260to investigate the reasonswhy you think3200:02:13,600 - 00:02:15,430its the right thing
8、to do.3300:02:15,530 - 00:02:20,080lets begin with those in the majoritywho would turn to go3400:02:20,239 - 00:02:23,600onto the side track.why would you do it?3500:02:23,880 - 00:02:28,540what would be your reason?whos willing to volunteer a reason?3600:02:30,120 - 00:02:31,580go ahead. stand up.3
9、700:02:31,760 - 00:02:34,900because it cant be rightto kill five people3800:02:35,280 - 00:02:37,690when you can onlykill one person instead.3900:02:39,870 - 00:02:42,960it wouldnt be rightto kill five if you could kill4000:02:43,269 - 00:02:48,260one person instead.thats a good reason.4100:02:48,91
10、0 - 00:02:53,880thats a good reason.who else?4200:02:54,269 - 00:03:00,490does everybody agreewith that reason? go ahead.4300:03:01,549 - 00:03:04,370well i was thinking its the same reasonon 9/11 with regard4400:03:04,660 - 00:03:08,560to the people who flew the planeinto the pennsylvania field4500
11、:03:08,760 - 00:03:11,590as heroes because they choseto kill the people on the plane4600:03:11,769 - 00:03:15,430and not kill more peoplein big buildings.4700:03:16,470 - 00:03:19,240so the principle therewas the same on 9/11.4800:03:19,630 - 00:03:22,530its a tragic circumstancebut better to kill o
12、ne4900:03:22,640 - 00:03:24,990so that five can live,5000:03:25,799 - 00:03:26,850is that the reasonmost of you had,5100:03:27,179 - 00:03:29,640those of youwho would turn? yes?5200:03:30,709 - 00:03:35,180lets hear nowfrom those in the minority,5300:03:35,560 - 00:03:39,850those who wouldnt turn. y
13、es.5400:03:40,480 - 00:03:42,470well, i think thatsthe same type of mentality5500:03:42,700 - 00:03:45,110that justifies genocideand totalitarianism.5600:03:45,440 - 00:03:48,030in order to saveone type of race,5700:03:48,260 - 00:03:49,570you wipe out the other.5800:03:50,560 - 00:03:52,080so what
14、would you doin this case?5900:03:52,310 - 00:03:57,590you would, to avoidthe horrors of genocide,6000:03:58,030 - 00:04:01,230you would crashinto the five and kill them?6100:04:03,600 - 00:04:05,700presumably, yes.6200:04:06,100 - 00:04:07,560you would?-yeah.6300:04:07,880 - 00:04:11,200okay. who el
15、se?thats a brave answer.6400:04:11,359 - 00:04:12,380thank you.6500:04:13,630 - 00:04:18,420lets consideranother trolley car case6600:04:20,360 - 00:04:26,060and see whether those of youin the majority6700:04:27,599 - 00:04:30,400want to adhereto the principle6800:04:31,180 - 00:04:33,660better that
16、 one should dieso that five should live.6900:04:33,920 - 00:04:35,730this time youre not the driverof the trolley car,7000:04:35,960 - 00:04:39,490youre an onlooker.youre standing on a bridge7100:04:39,590 - 00:04:41,820overlooking a trolley car track.7200:04:42,650 - 00:04:45,530and down the track
17、comesa trolley car,7300:04:46,039 - 00:04:48,140at the end of the trackare five workers,7400:04:49,750 - 00:04:52,390the brakes dont work,the trolley car7500:04:52,680 - 00:04:55,900is about to careeninto the five and kill them.7600:04:56,000 - 00:05:00,860and now, youre not the driver,you really fe
18、el helpless7700:05:01,460 - 00:05:06,010until you noticestanding next to you,7800:05:06,289 - 00:05:12,390leaning over the bridgeis a very fat man.7900:05:15,669 - 00:05:22,460and you couldgive him a shove.8000:05:23,110 - 00:05:29,460he would fall over the bridgeonto the track right in the way8100:
19、05:29,669 - 00:05:33,360of the trolley car.he would die8200:05:33,690 - 00:05:35,910but he would spare the five.8300:05:36,490 - 00:05:42,950now, how many would pushthe fat man over the bridge?8400:05:43,120 - 00:05:44,860raise your hand.8500:05:48,440 - 00:05:50,150how many wouldnt?8600:05:51,349 -
20、 00:05:55,560most people wouldnt.heres the obvious question.8700:05:55,840 - 00:06:01,620what became of the principlebetter to save five lives8800:06:01,750 - 00:06:03,710even if it means sacrificing one?8900:06:03,810 - 00:06:07,260what became of the principlethat almost everyone endorsed9000:06:07
21、,469 - 00:06:10,660in the first case?i need to hear from someone9100:06:10,760 - 00:06:13,640who was in the majorityin both cases.9200:06:13,840 - 00:06:17,160how do you explainthe difference between the two? yes.9300:06:18,280 - 00:06:21,030the second one, i guess,involves an active choice9400:06:2
22、1,130 - 00:06:26,230of pushing a person downwhich i guess that person himself9500:06:26,460 - 00:06:29,890would otherwise not have beeninvolved in the situation at all.9600:06:30,219 - 00:06:37,280and so to choose on his behalf,i guess, to involve him9700:06:37,380 - 00:06:39,370in something that he
23、otherwise would have escaped is,9800:06:40,240 - 00:06:43,180i guess, more than whatyou have in the first case9900:06:43,320 - 00:06:47,260where the three parties,the driver and the two sets of workers,10000:06:47,590 - 00:06:50,310are already, i guess,in the situation.10100:06:50,930 - 00:06:53,210
24、but the guy working,the one on the track10200:06:53,390 - 00:06:56,030off to the side,he didnt choose10300:06:56,130 - 00:06:59,710to sacrifice his life any morethan the fat man did, did he?10400:07:02,349 - 00:07:05,050thats true, but he wason the tracks and.10500:07:05,200 - 00:07:09,090this guy w
25、as on the bridge.10600:07:10,700 - 00:07:13,700go ahead, you can come backif you want. all right.10700:07:14,049 - 00:07:17,140its a hard question. you did well.you did very well.10800:07:17,500 - 00:07:18,900its a hard question.10900:07:19,840 - 00:07:26,670who else can find a wayof reconciling the
26、 reaction11000:07:26,930 - 00:07:29,760of the majorityin these two cases? yes.11100:07:30,120 - 00:07:33,410well, i guess in the first casewhere you have the one worker11200:07:33,510 - 00:07:37,510and the five,its a choice between those two11300:07:37,739 - 00:07:39,310and you have to makea certain
27、 choice and people11400:07:39,549 - 00:07:41,410are going to diebecause of the trolley car,11500:07:41,690 - 00:07:43,310not necessarily becauseof your direct actions.11600:07:43,650 - 00:07:47,490the trolley car is a runaway thingand youre making a split second choice.11700:07:47,880 - 00:07:50,550
28、whereas pushing the fat man overis an actual act11800:07:50,750 - 00:07:52,270of murder on your part.11900:07:52,560 - 00:07:55,570you have control over thatwhereas you may not have control12000:07:55,770 - 00:07:57,290over the trolley car.12100:07:57,760 - 00:08:00,040so i think its a slightlydiffe
29、rent situation.12200:08:00,549 - 00:08:04,390all right, who has a reply?thats good. who has a way?12300:08:04,780 - 00:08:07,870who wants to reply?is that a way out of this?12400:08:09,380 - 00:08:10,790i dont think thatsa very good reason12500:08:10,960 - 00:08:13,800because you choose to-either wa
30、y you have to choose12600:08:13,960 - 00:08:16,850who dies because you eitherchoose to turn and kill the person,12700:08:17,010 - 00:08:19,780which is an actof conscious thought to turn,12800:08:19,880 - 00:08:21,970or you choose to pushthe fat man over12900:08:22,080 - 00:08:24,540which is also an
31、active,conscious action.13000:08:24,870 - 00:08:26,860so either way,youre making a choice.13100:08:28,060 - 00:08:29,740do you want to reply?13200:08:30,090 - 00:08:31,820im not really surethat thats the case.13300:08:31,919 - 00:08:32,860it just still seemskind of different.13400:08:33,120 - 00:08:
32、36,130the act of actually pushingsomeone over onto the tracks13500:08:36,280 - 00:08:40,120and killing him,you are actually killing him yourself.13600:08:40,360 - 00:08:41,850youre pushing himwith your own hands.13700:08:42,030 - 00:08:43,290youre pushing himand thats different13800:08:43,470 - 00:0
33、8:46,020than steering somethingthat is going to cause13900:08:46,240 - 00:08:47,940death into another.14000:08:48,199 - 00:08:51,100you know, it doesnt really sound rightsaying it now.14100:08:51,199 - 00:08:54,200no, no. its good. its good.whats your name?14200:08:54,360 - 00:08:55,140andrew.14300:
34、08:55,510 - 00:08:57,210andrew.let me ask you this question, andrew.14400:08:57,209 - 00:08:58,310yes.14500:08:59,270 - 00:09:04,940suppose standing on the bridgenext to the fat man,14600:09:05,310 - 00:09:07,980i didnt have to push him,suppose he was standing over14700:09:08,280 - 00:09:12,260a tra
35、p door that i could openby turning a steering wheel like that.14800:09:17,199 - 00:09:18,400would you turn?14900:09:18,860 - 00:09:22,460for some reason,that still just seems more wrong.15000:09:22,630 - 00:09:23,310right?15100:09:23,600 - 00:09:26,700i mean, maybe if you accidentallylike leaned int
36、o the steering wheel15200:09:27,100 - 00:09:28,900or something like that.15300:09:29,900 - 00:09:33,600but. or say thatthe car is hurtling15400:09:33,640 - 00:09:36,190towards a switchthat will drop the trap.15500:09:38,089 - 00:09:39,320then i could agree with that.15600:09:39,439 - 00:09:40,240tha
37、ts all right. fair enough.15700:09:40,300 - 00:09:44,100it still seems wrong in a waythat it doesnt seem wrong15800:09:44,260 - 00:09:45,990in the first case to turn, you say.15900:09:46,319 - 00:09:48,020and in another way, i mean,in the first situation16000:09:48,120 - 00:09:50,420youre involved d
38、irectlywith the situation.16100:09:50,680 - 00:09:52,490in the second one,youre an onlooker as well.16200:09:52,500 - 00:09:54,600all right. -so you have the choiceof becoming involved or not16300:09:54,890 - 00:09:56,020by pushing the fat man.16400:09:56,100 - 00:09:59,700all right. lets forget for
39、 the momentabout this case.16500:09:59,800 - 00:10:02,890thats good.lets imagine a different case.16600:10:03,120 - 00:10:06,140this time youre a doctorin an emergency room16700:10:06,510 - 00:10:09,700and six patientscome to you.16800:10:11,810 - 00:10:15,180theyve been in a terribletrolley car wre
40、ck.16900:10:18,740 - 00:10:20,680five of themsustain moderate injuries,17000:10:20,770 - 00:10:23,050one is severely injured,you could spend all day17100:10:23,199 - 00:10:27,420caring for the oneseverely injured victim17200:10:27,750 - 00:10:29,740but in that time,the five would die.17300:10:29,970
41、 - 00:10:32,250or you could look after the five,restore them to health17400:10:32,420 - 00:10:35,720but during that time,the one severely injured person17500:10:35,839 - 00:10:36,660would die.17600:10:36,839 - 00:10:40,980how many would save the five?now as the doctor,17700:10:41,199 - 00:10:42,880h
42、ow many would save the one?17800:10:44,640 - 00:10:48,390very few people,just a handful of people.17900:10:49,560 - 00:10:53,980same reason, i assume.one life versus five?18000:10:55,719 - 00:10:58,840now consider another doctor case.18100:10:59,319 - 00:11:04,010this time, youre a transplant surgeo
43、nand you have five patients,18200:11:04,290 - 00:11:07,670each in desperate needof an organ transplant18300:11:07,819 - 00:11:09,700in order to survive.18400:11:09,959 - 00:11:13,520one needs a heart,one a lung, one a kidney,18500:11:13,760 - 00:11:18,040one a liver,and the fifth a pancreas.18600:11
44、:19,100 - 00:11:27,100and you have no organ donors.you are about to see them die.18700:11:27,829 - 00:11:32,620and then it occurs to youthat in the next room18800:11:32,709 - 00:11:36,030theres a healthy guywho came in for a check-up.18900:11:39,870 - 00:11:49,100and hes you like that and hes taking
45、 a nap,19000:11:53,510 - 00:11:58,240you could go in very quietly,yank out the five organs,19100:11:58,400 - 00:12:02,760that person would die,but you could save the five.19200:12:03,699 - 00:12:11,200how many would do it?anyone? how many?19300:12:11,579 - 00:12:13,750put your hands upif you would d
46、o it.19400:12:18,270 - 00:12:20,440anyone in the balcony?19500:12:20,540 - 00:12:21,280i would.19600:12:21,510 - 00:12:24,860you would? be careful,dont lean over too much.19700:12:27,050 - 00:12:31,180how many wouldnt?all right. what do you say?19800:12:31,459 - 00:12:32,670speak up in the balcony,1
47、9900:12:32,770 - 00:12:36,090you who would yank outthe organs. why?20000:12:36,319 - 00:12:39,070id actually like to explore aslightly alternate possibility20100:12:39,300 - 00:12:41,820of just taking the oneof the five who needs an organ20200:12:42,170 - 00:12:45,230who dies first and usingtheir fo
48、ur healthy organs20300:12:45,329 - 00:12:47,060to save the other four.20400:12:50,000 - 00:12:56,800thats a pretty good idea.thats a great idea20500:12:58,110 - 00:13:01,170except for the factthat you just wrecked20600:13:01,449 - 00:13:04,040the philosophical point.20700:13:05,000 - 00:13:10,130let
49、s step back from these storiesand these arguments20800:13:10,569 - 00:13:14,830to notice a couple of thingsabout the way the arguments20900:13:14,930 - 00:13:17,280have begun to unfold.21000:13:17,480 - 00:13:22,720certain moral principleshave already begun to emerge21100:13:23,339 - 00:13:25,880fro
50、m the discussions weve had.21200:13:26,400 - 00:13:30,900and lets considerwhat those moral principles look like.21300:13:31,540 - 00:13:34,550the first moral principlethat emerged in the discussion21400:13:34,990 - 00:13:38,500said the right thing to do,the moral thing to do21500:13:39,069 - 00:13:4
51、4,690depends on the consequencesthat will result from your action.21600:13:45,810 - 00:13:49,180at the end of the day,better that five should live21700:13:49,329 - 00:13:51,610even if one must die.21800:13:52,310 - 00:13:57,880thats an exampleof consequentialist moral reasoning.21900:13:59,420 - 00:14:01,770consequentialist moral reasoninglocates morality22000:14:01,870 - 00:14:04,570in the conse
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 私人定制房产转让协议样本
- 福利院护工招聘合同细则
- 酒店管理教师劳动合同模板
- 高端商务楼租赁合同模板
- 风力发电场并网配网工程施工合同
- 土石方填筑设计合同
- 停车场地平施工合同
- 零售业专用送货员聘用合同
- 医疗美容机构美发师聘用合同
- 亲子活动表演助理招聘协议
- 信用修复申请文书(当事人适用)
- 小型水闸委托管理协议书
- 专项资金支出明细表参考模板范本
- 八年级化学鲁教版(五四学制)全一册第二单元探秘水世界知识点梳理
- 工艺研发工程师岗位说明书
- 中国联通机房标准化规范
- 2023年电大期末考试劳动与社会保障法
- GB/T 41805-2022光学元件表面疵病定量检测方法显微散射暗场成像法
- GB/T 6438-2007饲料中粗灰分的测定
- 《乡土中国》之《从欲望到需要》同步教学
- 国内外总部基地研究多案例及经济分析课件
评论
0/150
提交评论