动物实验利与弊

1、动物实验利与弊论点 1 ：（正方）不人道 First of all, the main disadvantage of animal testing is the inhumane treatment of animals in tests due to the fact that anesthesia for the help of pain is often not used. Scientists say that using anesthesia will interfere with test results. Today the term“ vivisecti on” is use

2、d. Vivisecti on is defi ned as“ cutt ing while sbut it is more commonly used today as any harmful experiment or test that is performed on an animal. Animal experimentation invoIves the incarceration of animals and poisoning, mutilation, disease and killing of those individuals. It is arguably the mo

3、st brutal and most severe form of violenee in the modern world. It is said that an estimated 50,000 ani mals die due to the testi ng on them. Some of thetests that IAMS performed were:?28 female cats had their abdomens （腹部）cut open andsoluti on injected repeatedly into their bowels.?24 young dogs we

4、re give n kid ney failure by the removal of onekid ney and the damag ing of the other. All the dogs were killedafter being fed an experime ntal diet and their kid neys an alyzed.论点 2:（正方）可有别的措施 Many alter natives already exist, and theremust be many more which are wait ing to be found. The day will

5、surely come when not more experiments on animals will need to be done for huma n medic in e. its hared to say there will always bealter natives for veteri nary research, The most com mon alter natives that are used today are: in-vitro tests, computer software, and eve n human “ clinical tests ” . Th

6、e use of animal cells, organs, and tissue cultures are also deemed as alter natives,（反驳正方）however ani mal lives are still sacrificed for the use of their parts. We can only talk about banning experime ntati on whe n the alter natives have bee n proved to be accurate, and safe.t （反方反驳）As a medical st

7、ude nt, Iverealized that artificial mean s can n ever replace the in crediblecomplexity of livi ng an imals. It may not be possible to ban all ani maltests quite yet, but there should be a lot more mon ey, time and efforts going into finding alter natives.新 论点 3:正方：动物也有权利 Could anyone tell me why hu

8、mans aremore importa nt tha n any other ani mals? Could anyone please tell methe fun dame ntal reas on why huma n sufferi ng is absolutely more importa nt tha n an imal sufferi ng, why the intense agony experie need by a laboratory ani mal is incon seque ntial（不重要的，微不足道的）whe n view aga inst the same

9、 or eve n lesser degree of sufferi ng within a huma n. Of course We see ourselves as more importa nt tha n other species, as rm sure other self-realisi ng species see themselves, but we cannot use this flimsy（轻而薄的）,subjective （主观上的） argument as an excuse to totally disregard the feelings of other sp

10、ecies. You would nt like it if some alie n race claimi ng to be the most important turned up and squirted alien cosmetics in your mothers eye, would you? So I think animals should have the same rights as us. You would nt like it if people were doing any kind of experiment on you. Huma nkind has abso

11、lutely no right to use ani mals for any reas on whatsoever, especially for experime ntal use.新 论点 4 正方类比种族 We con duct such experime nts simply because we have physical dominance over all other species and thus we can exploit them at our will. But then where lies the contradiction betwee n this form

12、 exploitati on and that show n within the huma n species, such as the physical dominance that allowed Europea ns to exploit Africa ns in the slave trade. Why should I be utterly in differe nt to animal suffering because I stand to gain from it, yet I am morally obliged to be passi on ate about huma

13、n sufferi ng whether or not it could be for my pers onal betterme nt.Z新 论点5:正方动物实验有时候真的没有必要.1 understand the concerns over medical testing and human needs over animal lives, but the test ing obviously does nt work because there is still AIDS, can cer and all the other diseases that these tests are s

14、upposed to be curing. If medical tests really are needed, why cant there be a more humane way to do it? Why not use peoples cells, skin etc. Human volunteers should be used for final testing rather than animals.最后总结（正方） All in all, the ani mals can not tell the scie ntist that they don t want to be

15、tested on, but humans can. We need to talk for the animals and help stop this cruel and inhumane treatment. There are many other ways that products and medicine can be tested; the use of innocent ani mals is no Ion ger n eed ed. Let us tur n dow n cures that have bee n tested on ani mals. Thank you.

16、反方开场：For those opposed to all animal testing, please answer Yes orNo to the following questions1. Are you vegetaria n?2. Do you avoid buying leather shoes or clothes?3. Would you allow yourself or a loved one to suffer or even die because the necessary treatment had been developed using laboratory a

17、ni mals?If you answered Yes to ALL of the above, then you are free from hypocrisy （伪善，虚伪） in your moral stance（l 立场姿态）.论点 1:我们需要动物实验 Animals testing is really necessary.分论点（1）患者的需要 First of all , all the patients are in the need of the testi ng. Why? Could you realize that the ani mals you believe a

18、re being harmed, have not only impacted your lives in some way, but have impacted your families, friends, by providing people with vaccines and antibiotics. When it comes down to it, rightly or wrongly, we will all happily sacrifice an animal in order to save a loved one! Millions of lives are saved

19、 every year because of one animal s, results to either a drug or new form of surgery. Tell me that Which would you prefer to live - an ill child or a healthy bunny? With rights come responsibilities - what responsibilities to animals have? How many people who advocate banning animal testing have acc

20、epted medicines which have almost surely been tested on animals. A move towards ani mal rights means a move away from huma n rights.分论点（2 ）科学研究的需要 The sec on d,a ni mal testi ng is the most predo minant form of test ing used by scie ntists. An imal research plays a vital, and irreplaceable, role in

21、such fields as drug and cancer research.The phase of research on ani mals gave us esse ntial data which moved us on. The kno wledge so gained is being used to provide more effective treatme nt for seriously disabled huma ns.The results they yield bring a new outlook on life for millions around the w

22、orld. If ani mal test ing is bann ed, how will medic ines be developed? Will cures have to be tried only on huma ns? Will there be eno ugh volun teers? How about lawsuits by families of victims of imperfectly desig ned cures? A complete ban on ani mal testi ng will have very serious n egative effect

23、s on medical research. I believe that develop ing better, more effective and safer drugs is more importa nt than sparing a few rats.（反驳正方观点）Alternatives to animal testing must be developed but eve n these alter natives will require ani mal testing in order to compare results. Will the animal rights

24、activists endorse （赞同） any responsibility of the disastrous effects of their rosy cuddly thoughts? I doubt it.分论点（3）安全性需要 The third, It is imperative （必要的）that all drugs released on to the market are safe for huma ns to use. I feel that animal testing is necessary for the continuation of biological

25、and safety research. Even with animal & people testing, dangerous products still get on the market, imagine how many more will be on the market if we ban animal testing.论点2 :物竞天择An imal rights protesters are just a bunch of city dwellers who dont really un dersta nd how life works. Nature is predato

26、ry, the stron gest survive, and by testi ng drugs and medical research on ani mals which creates cures for human diseases, then those animals died to help us survive. A simple extrapolati on of the law of n ature .论点3 :采取相应的弥补措施：While we should n ever hurt an imals in the in terest of paltry （无价值 的） cosmetics, research for life-saving drugs and techniques requires limited use of real animals. I agree that animal testing should be continued, but agree with animal rights advo