机械毕业设计外文翻译_第1页
机械毕业设计外文翻译_第2页
机械毕业设计外文翻译_第3页
机械毕业设计外文翻译_第4页
机械毕业设计外文翻译_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩8页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、附录一 外文原稿:Anhydrous Ammonia Pressure Vessels In The Pulp And Paper IndustryThe purpose of this article is to ensure that pulp and paper operating companies, their engineering consultants, and inspection contractors are informed about stress corrosion cracking in anhydrous ammonia service. The informa

2、tion was written by a task group of the TAPPI Engineering Division Nondestructive Testing and Quality Control Subcommittee.Bacteria in some activated sludge effluent treatment systems require supplementary food. In some cases, this food is provided by ammonia and phosphoric acid which are stored on

3、the mill site. Ammonia is commonly stored as anhydrous liquid ammonia in carbon steel vessels at ambient temperature and 16 bar (250 psig) pressure.These vessels can be subject to stress corrosion cracking (SCC).SCC could cause release of ammonia, which is a hazardous chemical. SCC of carbon steel v

4、essels in anhydrous ammonia service is somewhat analogous to that experienced in continuous digesters. For example, the importances of stress relief during fabrication and of in-service inspection are common to both.This article concerns storage in horizontal pressure vessels at ambient temperature,

5、 as this type of vessel is used in pulp and paper applications. Large refrigerated storage tanks are used for atmospheric pressure storage in the chemical industry.History of Scc In Ammonia Storage VesselsThe history of SCC in carbon steel ammonia storage vessels was reviewed by Loginow (1) and is a

6、lso briefly summarized in a NACE Technical Committee Report entitled “Integrity of Equipment in Anhydrous Ammonia Storage and Handling” (2). In the 1950s, liquefied ammonia began to be injected directly into soil for fertilization. Failure of carbon steel storage vessels by SCC began to occur. These

7、 failures were unexpected since liquefied ammonia had been used for many years in the refrigeration, chemical, and metal heat treating industries without reported problems.Investigation confirmed SCC to be the cause of cracking. Three recommendations were made in 1962 that still form the basis of mo

8、dern codes: Pressure vessels should be fully stress relieved. Extreme care should be used to eliminate oxygen from ammonia systems. Ammonia should contain at least 0.2% water to inhibit SCC.Loginow reported that adoption of these recommendations practically eliminated SCC in carbon steel vessels in

9、the agriculture industry. However, in a recent Western Canadian survey SCC was found in 100 of 117 field storage vessels inspected by wet fluorescent magnetic particle testing (WFMT) (3).Despite the above measures SCC continued to occur in road transport tanks constructed from high strength steels,

10、in refrigerated storage vessels and in vessels which had been weld repaired but not subsequently stress relieved. An additional recommendation to limit steel tensile or yield strength was embodied in the U.S. and British ammonia storage codes, respectively (4, 5). ANSI K61.1Nominal tensile no greate

11、r than 70,000 psi (580 MPa) U.K. CodeMinimum specified yield strength shall not exceed 350 MPa (51,000 psi).PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONSThis article is concerned mainly with practical considerations important to pulp and paper mills already possessing anhydrous ammonia storage vessels or planning to fab

12、ricate such vessels. In view of the industrys experience with SCC in continuous digesters the governing objectives should be to control fabrication and inspection to prevent, or at least minimize, in-service problems including over-reaction to relatively minor crack indications. Guidance is availabl

13、e in the published codes and detailed information is available from some ammonia suppliers.FabricationThe two main objectives in fabrication should be to provide the most crack resistant vessel possible at reasonable cost and to ensure that an adequate inspection baseline is available for interpreta

14、tion of subsequent in-service inspections.ASME Section VIII Division 1 does not require stress relief for anhydrous ammonia storage pressure vessels unless the owner specifies a lethal service designation.The lethal service designation requires radiographic testing (RT) of all butt welded joints plu

15、s post weld heat treatment.ANSI K-61.1-1989, “American National Standard Safety Requirements for the Storage and Handling of Anhydrous Ammonia,” adds several requirements: Fabrication to ASME Section VIII Division 1 Table UW 12 at a joint efficiency less than 80% is not allowed. Inspection and testi

16、ng under UG-90(c) (2) (multiple, duplicate pressure vessel fabrication) is not allowed. Steel used for pressure containing parts shall have a nominal tensile strength no greater than 580MPa (70,000 psi). The minimum design pressure for ambient temperature storage shall be 16 bar (250 psig). Post wel

17、d heat treatment is mandatory and a furnace of sufficient size to accommodate the entire vessel is recommended. Welded attachments may be made to pads after post weld heat treatment. Horizontal vessels shall be mounted on saddles which extend over at least one third of the shells circumference. Ther

18、mal expansion and contraction shall be allowed for and means provided to prevent corrosion between the shell and the saddles.The 1986 British Code “Storage of Anhydrous Ammonia under Pressure in the United Kingdom” requires: Steel must have specified minimum yield strength less than 350 MPa (51,000

19、psi). Weld filler must have minimal strength overmatch compared with the base plate. 100% magnetic particle inspection of all internal welds in order to provide a record against which all future inspections of the vessel can be assessed. No welding is permitted after stress relief without subsequent

20、 local stress relief. Concrete saddles are prohibited. Support must be on continuously welded steel saddles attached before stress relief.Although the British Code does not state that magneti particle inspection should be by WFMT it is generally agreed that WFMT is the most sensitive technique and s

21、hould be used for inspection of ammonia storage vessels. All inspection should be performed by qualified technicians. SNT-TC-1A Level II is a recommended minimum.One pulp and paper company has added the following requirements for fabrication of such vessels: Incorporation of a “corrosion allowance”

22、of at least 1.6 mm (1/16 in.) to permit minor defect chasing during in-service inspections and to provide a margin against pitting which may occur if water is allowed to enter an out of service vessel. All weld toes profiled by grinding prior to wet fluorescent magnetic particle testing (WFMT). All

23、WFMT indications greater than 1.6 mm (1/16 in.) to be removed by grinding before post weld heat treatment. Shear wave ultrasonic testing (UT) of nozzle-to-shell welds permitted if RT is judged impractical. WFMT to be repeated after final hydrotest test of the vessel and the report retained by the ow

24、ner. Vessel to be dried completely after hydrotest test and nitrogen padded until filled with ammonia.Valves, piping, and fittingsBoth the ANSI and U.K. codes address piping, valves, and fittings. A detailed summary is beyond the scope of this article, but some points are worth noting. ANSI K61.1 re

25、quires all nonrefrigerated ammonia piping to meet the requirements of ANSI/ASME B31.3 “Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping.” The U.K. Code states copper and copper bearing alloys shall not be used.ANSI/ASME B31.3 requires a minimum of 5% of piping welds be radiographically tested. Valves an

26、d other apparatus should be rated for ammonia service and should not contain copper or copper alloy components.In one case, a nickel rupture disc corroded to failure at its periphery due to formation of an ammonia solution at a gasketed joint exposed to the weather.In-service inspectionVessel entry

27、Liquid or gaseous ammonia is hazardous and in some jurisdictions release of ammonia vapor to the atmosphere is prohibited by law. Vessels must be properly purged by water and/or steam. Detailed procedures for vessel purging and entry are available from ammonia suppliers (6).Inspection procedures The

28、 ANSI standard does not address in-service inspection but does state weld repair or alteration must conform to the current edition of the National Board Inspection Code (NBIC).The 1992 edition of the NBIC includes nonmandatory guidelines for inspection of liquid ammonia vessels (7).These guidelines

29、recommend: Power buffing or light sandblasting as surface preparation for inspection All interior welds be examined by WFMT. Cracks should be removed by grinding without encroaching on the minimum thickness required by ASME Section VIII and the original design. Weld repairs, regardless of size, shou

30、ld be post weld heat treated wherever possible.Light grinding does increase the sensitivity of WFMT compared to sandblasting or power buffing (8). For example the NBIC mandates grinding as surface preparation for deaerator inspection. The omission of grinding in the guidelines for ammonia vessel in-

31、service inspection may be due to concern that rough grinding may produce residual stress sufficient to initiate SCC in anhydrous ammonia service. If welds have been properly profiled for WFMT on initial fabrication, then grinding for in-service inspection should not be needed.The NBIC guidelines als

32、o state that other inspection methods such as acoustic emission or ultrasonics may be used and that fracture mechanics may be used to assess the integrity of vessels where complete removal of cracks is not practical.Normally the only corrosion that occurs in anhydrous ammonia vessels is due to water

33、 ingress during out of service periods. Shallow pitting, however, has been found in the bottom of some vessels beneath oily deposits. The source of oil is presumed to be from compressors used to handle the ammonia.In view of concerns over air contamination due to vessel entry and residual stress imp

34、arted by grinding nonintrusive inspection, techniques like acoustic emission and UT could be considered by vessel owners. The British Code does not mention nonintrusive inspection of ambient temperature pressure vessels but does state that, if acoustic emission is to be used for spherical storage ve

35、ssels, a reference base should be taken during initial hydrotesting. Nonintrusive inspection is being used in other industries (9).Vessel refilling Safety procedures should be established for refilling a vessel that has been emptied for inspection. It is also very important to purge the vessel of ai

36、r to prevent the occurrence of SCC. Detailed instructions are available from ammonia suppliers (10). If a vessel is not to be returned to service immediately after inspection, then care should be taken to dry it and possibly nitrogen-pad it depending on the time it will remain out of service.Inspect

37、ion frequency Neither the ANSI document nor the NBIC deals with inspection frequency. The British Code recommends the following: WFMT inspection of 100% of all internal butt welds within the first three years of service WFMT re-inspection within 2 years if significant defects are found Subsequent to

38、 no significant defects being found, any subsequent inspection should include WFMT of all Tee junctions and 10% of the total length of butt welds In no case should the subsequent examination interval exceed 6 years.It is apparent from the above that latitude can exist for in-service inspection techn

39、iques and frequencies. Each owner should determine inspection frequency in conjunction with the appropriate authority. Some jurisdictions require a 3-year inspection frequency.SUMMARYThe use of carbon steel pressure vessels for storage of anhydrous ammonia in the pulp and paper industry could be a n

40、on-event or deteriorate into a cycle of inspection and repair. This article has highlighted major concerns related to SCC. There is a wealth of additional information available on all considerations related to these vessels from the ANSI and British Codes, the NACE document, ammonia suppliers, and t

41、he current technical literature. The American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) holds the annual AIChE Ammonia Safety Symposium aimed at finding ways to safely manufacture, transport, and store ammonia and related chemicals. The proceedings of these symposia are published by AIChE. It is recom

42、mended that any owner of such vessels keep aware of current expertise.Reid is materials and corrosion section head with MacMillan Bloedel Research, 4225 Kincaid St., Burnaby, BC, Canada V5G 4P5.Task group members: Craig Reid; R.S. Charlton, Levelton Associates Consulting Engrs.; R.C. Faloon, MQSInsp

43、ections Inc.; and W. E. Boudreau, Belle Testing Inc.Literature cited1. Loginow,A.W. , Materials Performance 25 (12): 18(1986). 2. NACE Technical Committee report 5A192, Integrity of Equipment in Anhydrous Ammonia Storage and Handling, Houston, NACE Storage Tank, Spokane, 1992.3. Stephens, J. D. and

44、Vidalin, F., 1994 AIChE Ammonia Symposium Notes, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, p. 9. 4. Compressed Gas Association Inc., American National Standard Safety Requirements for the Storage and Handling of Anhydrous Ammonia ANSI K61.1-1989, Arlington, VA, 1989 (CGA Pamphlet G-2.1-198

45、9).5. Storage of Anhydrous Ammonia Under Pressure in the United Kingdom, London, Her Majestys Stationery Office, 1986. (Health and Safety Booklet HS/G 30)6. Cominco Fertilizers (U.S.) Inc., Decommissioning an Ammonia Storage Tank, Spokane, 1992.7. The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Ins

46、pectors, National Board Inspection Code: A Manual for Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors, Columbus, OH, 1992, p.197.8. Reid, J. C. and Reid, C., TAPPI 1992 Engineering Conference Proceedings, TAPPI PRESS, Atlanta, Book I, p.163.9. Conley, M. J., Sture, A., and Williams, D., “Ammonia Vessel Integr

47、ity Program: A Modern Approach, 1990 AIChE Ammonia Symposium Notes, New York, AIChE, 1990.10. Cominco Fertilizers (U.S.) Inc., “Commissioning an Ammonia Storage Tank”, Spokane, 1992.附录二 外文翻译:纸浆和造纸行业中的无水氨压力容器本文的目的是为了确保纸浆和纸张经营公司,他们的工程顾问,承建商了解在脱水氨设备中的应力腐蚀开裂现象。这篇资料是由美国纸浆与造纸工业技术协会无损检测工程部和质量控制小组委员会共同编写。细菌

48、生存在一些活性污泥污水处理系统中需要充足的食物。在某些情况下,这种食品是氨和磷酸的储存现场。氨通常以无水液氨的形式贮存在室温和1.6MPa(250 磅)的压力的碳钢容器中。这些容器可能会受到应力腐蚀开裂(SCC)。应力腐蚀开裂可能导致氨泄露,这是一种危险化学品。用于无水氨设备的碳钢容器中的SCC是有点类似于连续蒸煮罐的经验。例如,减少压力的引入在生产和在役检查过程都是很常见的。本文关注在常温下的卧式压力容器,像这类型容器通常用于纸浆和造纸的应用。大型冷藏储罐在化工行业一般是常压储存。SCC在氨储罐的历史SCC在碳钢氨储存容器的历史是由Loginow(1)审查通过,也是在简要回顾了NACE技术委

49、员会报告题为“完整的设备在无水氨的储存和处理”(2)。在20世纪50年代,液氨作为肥料直接注入土壤。碳钢贮存容器由于应力腐蚀开裂而导致的故障开始出现。这些故障是意外,因为液氨已用于在制冷,化工多年,金属热处理行业没有报告的问题。 调查结果证应力腐蚀是开裂的原因。1962年提出了三条建议构成了现代条例的基础: 压力容器应充分消除应力。 要特别小心是消除氨系统中的氧气。 氨应该包含至少0.2的水,以抑制应力腐蚀开裂。Loginow报告说,采用这些建议能有效避免应力腐蚀发生在农业用碳钢容器中。然而,最近的加拿大西部的调查显示通过湿荧光磁粉探伤检查(WFMT)(3)发现117处农场的储罐中有100处发

50、生了应力腐蚀开裂。 尽管采用了上述措施,SCC仍然发生在由高强度钢建造的公路运输油罐、冷藏储存容器以及作了焊接修复却没后续的应力消除的容器。另外一条建议被纳入美国和英国的氨储存条例,以限制钢材的拉伸或屈服强度。 ANSI K61.1 -名义抗拉强度不超过70,000磅(580兆帕) 英国条例指定的最低屈服强度不超过350兆帕(51,000磅)。实用的考虑 本文主要关注是实际问题对于已拥有无水氨贮存容器的纸浆和造纸厂或计划制作这类容器的重要性。以连续蒸发罐中SCC的经验来看,执行目标应该是控制制造和检验,以避免或至少减少在运行中的问题,包括过度反应相对轻微裂缝的迹象。从一些氨的供应商提供公开条例

51、和规范资料可以得到相关的指导。制造 制作中的两个主要目标应是提为抗裂容器供合理的成本,并确保为后续在役检验的解释有适当的检验基线可用。ASME第1部第VIII节没有要求无水氨存储压力容器要应力消除,除非拥有者指定了一个致命的部件名称。指定的致命部件需要焊接接头的焊后热处理加所有对接射线检测(RT)。美国国家标准化组织(ANSI)K 61.1 - 1989,“美国国家标准无水氨的存储和处理安全要求”增加了几个要求: 制造符合ASME第一部第VIII节UW12表的效率不能低于80。 基于UG-90(c)检查和测试是不允许的。 用于压力容器部件的钢材的标称抗拉强度应当不低于580MPa(70,000

52、 psi)。 室温储罐的最低设计压力应当为16bar(250 psig)的。 必须进行焊后热处理,要求足够大的熔炉来适应整个容器。附件的焊接点可能要进行热处理 卧式压力容器应当安装在鞍座超过至少有一个壳体的周长三分之一。应允许热膨胀和收缩和给出以防止壳体和鞍座之间腐蚀的方法。1986年英国章程“英国常压无水氨储存”要求: 钢材的指定最低屈服强度必须小于350兆帕(51,000磅)。 焊接填充物的最小强度必须高于于比母材强度。 100的内部焊缝磁粉探伤,对未来所有的容器检查提供可以评估的纪录。 没有后续局部应力消除的应力消除后允许无焊接 混凝土鞍座是禁止的。 钢制鞍座连续焊接必须在应力释放之前。

53、虽然英国规范并没有规定磁化粒子检查应当进行湿荧光磁粉实验,人们普遍认为,WFMT是最灵敏的技术,应该用于检验氨贮存容器。所有的检查应该由合格的技术人员来完成。SNT-TC-1A II级是建议的最低水平。其中纸浆和造纸公司已对这些容器的制造增加了下列要求: 设立“腐蚀裕量”至少1.6毫米(1 / 16英寸),允许在役检验中出现的微小缺陷,并在容器停止服役期间浸水,对可能出现的腐蚀保持一定的裕度,。 湿荧光磁粉探伤(WFMT)检验所有焊接接头前要进行磨削。在焊后热处理前,大于1.6毫米(1 / 16英寸)所有WFMT迹象要被磨削。 如果射线探伤不符合实际,可以使用横波超声波检测(UT)。 容器水压

54、试验后重复进行WFMT,由业主保留的测试报告。 容器水压试验后要完全干燥,并且进行充氮保护直至填充氨。阀门,管道及配件ANSI和英国压力容器规范都对管道,阀门和配件进行了论述。详细摘要已经超出了本文的范围,但有些要点是值得注意的。 ANSI K61.1要求所有的非冷却氨管道要满足符合ANSI / ASME B31.3的规定“化工厂和石油精炼厂管道。” 英国压力容器规范规定铜及铜合金轴承不得使用。ANSI / ASME B31.3要求5以上管道焊缝需要X线测试。阀门和其他设备应使用标准的的氨部件,并且不能含有铜或铜合金成分。在一个案例中,一个镀镍爆破片腐蚀失效原因在于衬垫上的氨溶液的形成在役检查容器引进。液态或气态氨是危险化学品的,而且某些司法管辖区的法律禁止氨蒸气释放到大气中。容器

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论