已阅读1页,还剩25页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
测量 四肢 血压 的预测价值上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院上海市高血压研究所王继光 第1 页/ 共26 页The Shanghai Cardiovascular Health Study (SCHS) n The JingNing population studyn The QingPu population studyn The QingPu study in the elderly n The NingBo study in the workplace setting 第2 页/ 共26 页baPWV and mortality第3 页/ 共26 页SCHS: Objective To investigate the prognostic significance of four-limb blood pressure for total and CV mortality in an elderly (60 years) Chinese population. Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第4 页/ 共26 页SCHS: Study population n We invited all residents of 60 years or older from villages and communities of a town in the suburb of Shanghai, 30 km from the city centre, to participate in cardiovascular health examinations. n Our study started in 2006 on subjects in the age range from 60 to 69 years, and then in 2007 on subjects of 70 years or older. These subjects were followed up for events, and repeated examinations were performed once every 2 years. Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第5 页/ 共26 页OMRON VP-1000SCHS: Four-limb BP and pulse wave velocity1. Four-limb BP for the calculation of BP differences and ratios, eg, ankle-brachial index (ABI)2. Pulse wave velocity (brachial-ankle)第6 页/ 共26 页四肢血 压u 上臂血 压 u 踝臂指数 (ABI) = 较 低一 侧 踝部血 压 /较 高一 侧 肱 动 脉血压u 双臂 间 血 压 差 值 = 左臂血压 右臂血压 u 双踝 间 血 压 差 值 = 左踝血压 右踝血压 Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第7 页/ 共26 页 Means and proportions were compared with the student t-test and Fishers exact test, respectively. Multiple Cox regression analyses were used to determine the hazard ratios of total and CV mortality with 4-limb BP ratios and difference, while controlling for covariates. The log-rank test was used to compare the cumulative incidence of mortality between groups, with Kaplan-Meier survival curve to show the time to deaths. The C-statistic analysis was performed to examine the incremental prognostic value for mortality.Statistical methods Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第8 页/ 共26 页研究结果第9 页/ 共26 页General outline of the study Number of participants: 3133 Median follow-up time: 4.0 years Cumulative number of person-years: 12,500 Number of total deaths: 203 Number of CV deaths: 93 (CHD, CHF and stroke)Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第10 页/ 共26 页基线特征 (1)Characteristic Men (n=1383) Women (n=1750) P valueAge, years 68.57.2 69.37.5 0.005Body mass index, kg/m2 23.43.4 23.83.7 0.002Systolic pressure, mm Hg 136.518.6 141.320.2 0.9All mortalityCV mortalityNo. of event / No. on riskRate per 1000 p-yrs2.02 (1.24-3.30)1.70 (0.86-3.39)* Adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, current smoking, current alcohol intake, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, diabetes mellitus, and serum total cholesterol.ABI0.95 ABI0.95All mortalityCV mortality39/175 55.822/175 31.5164/2958 13.971/2958 6.02.23 (1.52-3.26)2.12 (1.24-3.64)Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第16 页/ 共26 页双臂 间 血 压 差 Total mortality CV mortalityHR (95%CI)* P value HR (95%CI)* P valueSystolic (+3.76 mmHg) 1.16 (1.04-1.30) 0.01 1.18 (1.01-1.40) 0.04Diastolic (+3.07 mmHg) 1.17 (1.05-1.31) 0.005 1.23 (1.06-1.44) 0.006* The analyses were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, current smoking, current alcohol intake, use of antihypertensive drugs, diabetes mellitus, serum total cholesterol, and arm systolic and diastolic blood pressure.双臂间血压差值预测价值Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第17 页/ 共26 页双臂间血压差值预测价值Total mortalitySheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第18 页/ 共26 页Event Relative risk (95% CI)0.5 1 2 4 821/199 25.59/199 10.9182/2934 15.5 84/2934 7.210 mmHgAll mortalityCV mortalityNo. of event / No. on riskRate per 1000 p-yrs1.72 (1.06-2.80)1.45 (0.70-3.00)* Adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, current smoking, current alcohol intake, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hypertension treatment, diabetes mellitus, and serum total cholesterol.All mortalityCV mortality9/55 40.34/55 17.9194/3078 15.889/3078 7.22.47 (1.24-4.93)2.11 (0.75-5.96)双臂间血压差值预测价值0.9)Total mortality CV mortalityHR (95% CI)* P value HR (95% CI)* P valueInter-arm BP difference, mm Hg 10 vs 10 1.44 (0.78-2.65) 0.24 1.29 (0.50-3.31) 0.5915 vs 15 2.04 (0.74-5.65) 0.17 2.36 (0.54-10.29) 0.25Inter-ankle BP difference, mm Hg10 vs 10 1.63 (1.17-2.27) 0.004 1.70 (1.05-2.77) 0.0315 vs 15 1.82 (1.18-2.80) 0.006 1.86 (1.02-3.40) 0.04Sheng CS, et al. Hypertension 2013; 61:1155-60.第23 页/ 共26 页Total mortality CV mortalityc statistic P value* c statistic P value*ABI0.90 0.54 (0.52-0.57) - 0.56 (0.52-0.59) -+Inter-arm BP difference 15 mmHg 0.55 (0.52-0.57) 0.46 0.56 (0.53-0.60) 0.50+Inter-ankle BP difference 15 mmHg 0.59 (0.56-0.62) 0.0001 0.62 (0.57-0.67) 0.0001+Inter-arm BP difference 15 mmHg and Inter-ankle BP difference 15 mmHg0.60 (0.57-0.62) 0.00010.63 (0.58-0.67) 0.0001Incremental prognostic value*For the comparison with the c
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 北京市海淀区2026届高三第二学期期中练习 化学试题(含答案)
- 创新型企业组织结构优化方案
- 宏观经济学核心考点压缩总结(高鸿业版)
- 超市商品陈列与促销技巧总结
- 长春财经学院《国际结算》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 闽江师范高等专科学校《地方导游基础知识》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 徽商职业学院《畜牧微生物学》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 盐城工学院《中国画论史》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 厦门大学《企业管理与技术经济分析》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 福建江夏学院《民间文学》2025-2026学年期末试卷
- 升压站运维安全培训课件
- 2025山东滨州阳信县医疗卫生机构招聘人员44人笔试备考题库及答案解析
- APQP第三版及CP第一版介绍
- 广西森林林管理办法
- 眼部健康检查课件
- 2025湖北武汉誉城千里建工有限公司招聘21人笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解
- 癌痛患者的健康宣教
- 施工现场安全防护设施标准化指南
- CJ/T 114-2000高密度聚乙烯外护管聚氨酯泡沫塑料预制直埋保温管
- 中医把脉课件视频
- 《数据科学导论》课件
评论
0/150
提交评论