版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、Two-way ANOVA,Two-way between-subjects ANOVA,Example: Beer-goggles effect,After alcohol had been consumed, subjective perceptions of physical attractiveness would become more inaccurate 2 between-subjects IVs: Gender: male and female Amount of alcohol consumed: 0, 2 pints, and 4 pints,How to enter d
2、ata in SPSS?,Gender: F (1, 42) = 2.03, p.05 Alcohol consumption: F (2, 42) = 20.07, p.001 Gender X Alcohol consumption: F (2, 42) = 11.91, p.001,Corrected Model = Gender + Alcohol + Gender * Alcohol Corrected Model + Error = Corrected Total Corrected Total + Intercept = Total Corrected Model / Corre
3、cted Total = R Squared,Interaction and main effects,Gender, p.05 Alcohol, p.05 Gender X Alcohol, p.001 Main effect is justified by interaction!,Estimated marginal means,Simple main effect of Alcohol,Syntax 1: GLM Attractiveness by alcohol gender /EMMEANS = tables(alcohol*gender)compare(alcohol),Cant
4、 see how the three levels of alcohol differed within each gender group.,Simple main effect of Alcohol,Syntax 2: manova attractiveness by Alcohol(1 3) Gender (0 1) /error = within /design = alcohol within gender(1) alcohol within gender(2).,Simple main effect of Alcohol,2 one-way ANOVA for alcohol on
5、 each level of gender with paired comparisons with correction,When Gender is Male,Participant numbers were different from those used in MANOVA, so MSs of Alcohol were identical, but F values were different.,When Gender is Female,Output report,ANOVA results show that the main effect of Gender is not
6、significant, F (1, 42) = 2.03, p.05, but the main effect of Alcohol consumption is significant, F (2, 42) = 20.07, p.05 (p=.546).,Graph for interaction,Use estimated marginal means,Use excel !,Graph with error bars!,For another example: Instructions and scores,Q: Do exam instruction affect scores of
7、 students with varying abilities? Two IVs: Instruction: neutral, encourage Ability of student: low, medium, high DV: scores,Output,Method: F (1, 54) = 27.19, p.05,No significant interaction, no simple effects Report contrast or paired comparisons for significant main effects,Two-way repeated ANOVA,E
8、xample: wine attitude,Attitudes towards stimuli can be changed using positive or negative imagery (Field, 2005; Stuart, Shimp, & Engle, 1987) Q: does imagery change attitudes towards wine? IV: drink (beer, wine, water) imagery (positive, negative, neutral) DV: attitudes (-100 100),Example: wine atti
9、tude,IV: drink (beer, wine, water) imagery (positive-happy, negative-corpse, neutralperson in an armchair) DV: attitudes (-100 100),Result from ANOVA,Drink: F(1.15, 21.93)=5.11, p=.03 Imagery: F(1.50, 28.40)=122.57, p.001 Drink X Imagery: F(4, 76)=17.16, p.001,Interaction between Drink and Imagery,S
10、imple main effect of Drink,manova beerpos beerneg beerneut winepos wineneg wineneut waterpos waterneg waterneut /wsfactors = drink(3) imagery(3) /wsdesign = drink within imagery(1) drink within imagery(2) drink within imagery(3).,Output of simple main effect of Drink (MANOVA),Simple main effect of D
11、rink (one-way repeated ANOVA)-imagery 1(positive),F(1.55, 29.53)=3.06, p=.074,Simple main effect of Drink (one-way repeated ANOVA)-imagery 2 (negative),F (1.22, 23.26)=14.08, p=.001,Simple main effect of Drink (one-way repeated ANOVA)-imagery 2 (negative),Simple main effect of Drink (one-way repeate
12、d ANOVA)-imagery 3 (neutral),F(1.33, 25.21) = 7.27, p=.008,Simple main effect of Drink (one-way repeated ANOVA)-imagery 3 (neutral),Two-way mixed design ANOVA,IVA: between-subjects IVB: Within-subject,Example: two-way mixed design,Q: How do age and task difficulty affect task performance? IVs: A: Ag
13、e (between-subject) B: Task difficulty (within-subject) DV: task performance AnalyzeGLM-Repeated measures,Output for within-subject effect,Difficulty: F(2, 66)=152.27, p.001, Difficulty X Age: F (4, 66)=36.60, p.001,Output for between-subject effect,Age: F (2, 33)=62.82, p.001,Interaction between Di
14、fficulty X Age,Difficulty X Age: F (4, 66)=36.60, p.001,Simple main effect of Task Difficulty (MANOVA),manova a1 a2 a3 by age (1,3) /wsfactors = a (3) /wsdesign = a /design = mwithin age(1) mwithin age(2) mwithin age(3).,Output of simple main effect of Task Difficulty (MANOVA),Age (1), Difficulty: F
15、 (2,66)=82.72, p.001 Age (2), Difficulty: F (2,66)=141.92, p.001 Age (3), Difficulty: F (2,66)=0.83, p=.442,* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A n a l y s i s o f V a r i a n c e - Design 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Tests involving A Within-Subject Effect. AVERAGED Tests of Significance for a
16、 using UNIQUE sums of squares Source of Variation SS DF MS F Sig of F WITHIN+RESIDUAL 95.50 66 1.45 MWITHIN AGE(1) BY A 239.39 2 119.69 82.72 .000 MWITHIN AGE(2) BY A 410.72 2 205.36 141.92 .000 MWITHIN AGE(3) BY A 2.39 2 1.19 .83 .442,Simple main effect of Task Difficulty (one-way repeated ANOVAs)1
17、,When Age=1, Difficulty: F(1.38, 15.14)=84.19, p.001,Simple main effect of Task Difficulty (one-way repeated ANOVAs)1,Simple main effect of Task Difficulty (one-way repeated ANOVAs)2,When Age=2, F (2,22)=119.07, p.001,Simple main effect of Task Difficulty (one-way repeated ANOVAs)2,Simple main effec
18、t of Task Difficulty (one-way repeated ANOVAs)3,When Age=3, F(2,22)=1.00, p=.384,Simple main effect of Age (MANOVA) 1,manova a1 a2 a3 by age (1,3) /wsfactors = a (3) /wsdesign = mwithin a(1) mwithin a(2) mwithin a(3) /design = age.,Tests involving MWITHIN A(1) Within-Subject Effect. Tests of Signifi
19、cance for T1 using UNIQUE sums of squares Source of Variation SS DF MS F Sig of F WITHIN+RESIDUAL 88.83 33 2.69 MWITHIN A(1) 4624.00 1 4624.00 1717.73 .000 AGE BY MWITHIN A(1) 547.17 2 273.58 101.63 .000,Difficulty (1): Age, F(2, 33) = 101.63, p.001,Simple main effect of Age (MANOVA) 2,Difficulty (2
20、): Age, F (2, 33)=53.78, p.001 Difficulty (3): Age, F (2, 33)=11.95, p.001,Tests involving MWITHIN A(2) Within-Subject Effect. Tests of Significance for T2 using UNIQUE sums of squares Source of Variation SS DF MS F Sig of F WITHIN+RESIDUAL 87.33 33 2.65 MWITHIN A(2) 2304.00 1 2304.00 870.60 .000 AGE BY MWITHIN A(2) 284.67 2 142.33 53.78 .000,Tests involving MWITHIN A(3) Within-Subject Effect. Tests of Significance for T3 usin
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 舞台导演艺术管理面试题及演出策划含答案
- 媒体平台UI设计师面试题参考
- 销售绩效考核与激励机制
- 书屋课件教学课件
- 书吧课件教学课件
- 节能灯项目可行性研究报告(总投资7000万元)(33亩)
- 餐饮业市场部招聘面试题及答案
- 特殊人群医疗器械的设计与适配
- 网络推广专员面试题集含答案
- 游戏公司物资采购部主管问题集
- 弓网磨耗预测模型-洞察及研究
- 登山景观设计汇报
- 肩袖损伤的护理查房
- 实验幼儿园经营管理权项目公开招投标书范本
- 学堂在线 R语言数据分析 期末测试答案
- 铁路隐蔽工程管理办法
- 哪些企业需要做安全评价
- 失血性休克病人病例麻醉
- CJ/T 3042-1995污水处理用辐流沉淀池周边传动刮泥机
- 挂靠试驾车协议书
- 接受委托屠宰协议书
评论
0/150
提交评论