亨格瑞成本与管理会计(第16版) 课件Chapter 16 Allocation of Support-Department Costs,Common Costs,and Revenues_第1页
亨格瑞成本与管理会计(第16版) 课件Chapter 16 Allocation of Support-Department Costs,Common Costs,and Revenues_第2页
亨格瑞成本与管理会计(第16版) 课件Chapter 16 Allocation of Support-Department Costs,Common Costs,and Revenues_第3页
亨格瑞成本与管理会计(第16版) 课件Chapter 16 Allocation of Support-Department Costs,Common Costs,and Revenues_第4页
亨格瑞成本与管理会计(第16版) 课件Chapter 16 Allocation of Support-Department Costs,Common Costs,and Revenues_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩35页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

CostAccountingSeventeenthEdition,GlobalEditionChapter16AllocationofSupport-DepartmentCosts,CommonCosts,andRevenuesLearningObjectives(1of2)16.1Distinguishthesingle-ratemethodfromthedual-ratemethod16.2Understandhowthechoicebetweenallocationbasedonbudgetedandactualratesandbetweenbudgetedandactualusagecanaffecttheincentivesofdivisionmanagers16.3Allocatemultiplesupport-departmentcostsusingthedirectmethod,thestep-downmethod,andthereciprocalmethod16.4Allocatecommoncostsusingthestand-alonemethodandtheincrementalmethodLearningObjectives(2of2)16.5Explaintheimportanceofexplicitagreementbetweencontractingpartieswhenthereimbursementamountisbasedoncostsincurred16.6UnderstandhowbundlingofproductscausesrevenueallocationissuesandthemethodsmanagersusetoallocaterevenuesAllocatingSupportDepartmentCostsUsingSingle-RateandDual-RateMethods(1of2)Howacompanyallocatesitsoverheadandinternalsupportcosts—costsrelatedtomarketing,advertising,andotherinternalservices—amongitsvariousproductiondepartmentsorprojectscanhaveabigimpactonhowprofitablethosedepartmentsorprojectsare.Operating(production)department—directlyaddsvaluetoaproductorservice.Support(service)department—providestheservicesthatassistotherinternaldepartments(operatingdepartmentsandothersupportdepartments)inthecompany.AllocatingSupportDepartmentCostsUsingSingle-RateandDual-RateMethods(2of2)Managersfacetwoquestionswhenallocatingthecostsofasupportdepartmenttooperatingdepartmentsordivisions:Shouldfixedcostsofsupportdepartmentsbeallocatedtooperatingdivisions?Iffixedcostsareallocated,shouldvariableandfixedcostsofthesupportdepartmentbeallocatedinthesameway?TwoMethodstoAllocateSupportDepartmentCosts:Single-RateandDual-Rate(1of2)Dependingontheanswertoourfirstquestion(fromthepriorslide),therearetwoapproachestoallocatingsupport-departmentcosts:thesinge-ratecostallocationmethodandthedual-ratecost-allocationmethod.Thesingle-ratemethoddoesnotdistinguishbetweenfixedandvariablecosts.Itallocatescostsineachcostpoolusingthesamerateperunitofasingleallocationbase.Asupportdepartmentwouldbeanexampleofacost-pool.TwoMethodstoAllocateSupportDepartmentCosts:Single-RateandDual-Rate(2of2)Thedual-ratemethodpartitionsthecostofeachsupportdepartmentintotwopools,avariable-costpoolandafixed-costpool.Itallocateseachpoolusingadifferentcost-allocationbase.AllocationBasesUndereithermethod,allocationofsupportcostscanbebasedononeofthethreefollowingscenarios:BudgetedoverheadrateandbudgetedhoursBudgetedoverheadrateandactualhoursActualoverheadrateandactualhoursWhenusingeithermethod,managerscanallocatesupport-departmentcoststooperatingdivisionsbasedoneitherabudgetedrateortheeventualactualcostrate.Wecanalsoallocatebasedondemand(usage)orsupply(practicalcapacity).Thelatterapproach(usingactualrates)isneitherpreferrednorwidelyused;wewillillustrateusingbudgetedrates.AdvantagesandDisadvantages:Single-RateMethodAdvantagesLesscostlytoimplementOffersuserdepartmentssomeoperationalcontroloverthechargestheybearDisadvantagesMayleadoperatingdepartmentmanagerstomakesuboptimaldecisionsthatareintheirownbestinterestbutmaybeinefficientfromthestandpointoftheorganizationasawholeAdvantagesandDisadvantages:Dual-RateMethod(1of2)AdvantagesGuidesdepartmentmanagerstomakedecisionsthatbenefitboththeorganizationasawholeandeachdepartmentAllocatingfixedcostsbasedonbudgetedusagehelpsuserdepartmentswithbothshort-runandlong-runplanningbecauseuserdepartmentsknowthecostsallocatedtotheminadvanceAdvantagesandDisadvantages:Dual-RateMethod(2of2)DisadvantagesRequiresmanagerstodistinguishvariablecostsfromfixedcosts,whichisoftenachallengingtaskDoesnotindicatetooperatingmanagersthecostoffixedsupportdepartmentresourcesusedbecausefixedcostsareallocatedtooperatingdepartmentsbasedonbudgetedratherthanactualusageAllocatingfixedcostsonthebasisofbudgetedlong-runusagemaytemptsomemanagerstounderestimatetheirplannedusage.BudgetedVersusActualCostsandtheChoiceofAllocationBase(1of4)Theallocationmethodspreviouslyoutlinedfollowspecificproceduresintermsofthesupportdepartmentcoststhatareconsideredaswellasthemannerinwhichcostsareassignedtotheoperatingdepartments.Wewillnowexaminethesechoicesingreaterdetailandconsidertheimpactofalternativeapproaches.We’llseehowthosedecisionshaveasignificantimpactonthecostallocatedtoeachoperatingdepartmentandtheincentivesoftheoperatingdepartmentmanagers.BudgetedVersusActualCostsandtheChoiceofAllocationBase(2of4)Budgetedversusactualrates—Useofactualratesimposesahighlevelofuncertaintyonuserdepartments.Budgetedratestendtomotivatethemanagerofthesupport(orsupplier)departmenttoimproveefficiencyandtodecideappropriately(ifallowed)whethertousetheinternalresourceoranexternalvendor.Budgetedversusactualusage—Actualusageisbestherebecausethevariablecostsaredirectlyandcausallylinkedtousage.Also,allocatingvariablecostsonthebasisofbudgetedusagewouldprovidetheuserdepartmentswithnoincentivetocontroltheirconsumptionofsupportservices.BudgetedVersusActualCostsandtheChoiceofAllocationBase(3of4)Fixed-costallocationbasedonbudgetedratesandbudgetedusage—Whenbudgetedusageistheallocationbase,userdepartmentsreceiveapresentlump-sumfixed-costcharge.Ratescanbesetbasedonbudgetedusageoronpracticalcapacity.Fixed-costallocationbasedonbudgetedratesandactualusage—Ifactualusageisequaltobudgetedusagebutlessthanpracticalcapacity,100%ofthedepartmentscostsareallocatedeventhoughthedepartmenthadidlecapacity.BudgetedVersusActualCostsandtheChoiceofAllocationBase(4of4)Allocatingbudgetedfixedcostsbasedonactualusage—Whenbudgetedfixedcostsareallocatedbasedonactualusage,userdepartmentswillnotknowtheirfixed-costallocationsuntiltheendofthebudgetperiod.Therefore,thismethodsharestheflawasthemethodsthatrelyontheuseofactualcostsratesratherthanbudgetedcostrates.Insummary,strongeconomicandmotivationalreasonsjustifythepreciseformsofthesingle-rateanddual-ratemethodsconsideredintheprevioussectionand,inparticular,tosupporttheuseofthedual-rateallocationprocedure.AllocatingCostsofMultipleSupportDepartments(1of2)Now,weexaminethespecialcost-allocationproblemsthatarisewhentwoormoreofthesupportdepartmentswhosecostsarebeingallocatedprovidereciprocalsupporttoeachotheraswellastooperatingdepartments.Theallocationisdoneinthreesteps:Traceorallocateeachcosttovarioussupportandoperatingdepartments.Allocateplantadministrationcoststoothersupportdepartmentsandoperatingdepartments.Allocatethesupportdepartmentcoststotheoperatingdepartments.AllocatingCostsofMultipleSupportDepartments(2of2)Threemethodscanbeusedfortheallocations:DirectMethod—allocateseachsupportdepartment’sbudgetedcoststooperatingdepartmentsonly;noallocationstoothersupportdepartmentsStep-DownMethod—allocatessupport-departmentcoststoothersupportdepartmentsandtooperatingdepartmentsinasequentialmannerthatpartiallyrecognizesthemutualservicesprovidedamongallsupportdepartmentsReciprocalMethod—allocatessupport-departmentcoststooperatingdepartmentsbyfullyrecognizingthemutualservicesprovidedamongallsupportdepartmentsDirectMethodAllocatessupportcostsonlytooperatingdepartmentsDirectmethoddoesnotallocatesupport-departmentcoststoothersupportdepartments.DataUsedinCostAllocationExampleExhibit16.3DataforAllocatingSupportDepartmentCostsatRobinsonCompanyDirectAllocationMethodIllustratedExhibit16.4DirectMethodofAllocatingSupportDepartmentCostsatRobinsonCompanyDirectAllocationMethodExampleExhibit16.4DirectMethodofAllocatingSupportDepartmentCostsatRobinsonCompanyStep-DownMethodAlsocalledthesequentialallocationmethod.Allocatessupport-departmentcoststoothersupportdepartmentsandtooperatingdepartmentsinasequentialmannerthatpartiallyrecognizesthemutualservicesprovidedamongallsupportdepartments.Step-DownAllocationMethodIllustratedExhibit16.5Step-DownMethodofAllocatingSupportDepartmentCostsatRobinsonCompanyStep-DownAllocationMethodExampleExhibit16.5Step-DownMethodofAllocatingSupportDepartmentCostsatRobinsonCompanyReciprocalMethodAllocatessupport-departmentcoststooperatingdepartmentsbyfullyrecognizingthemutualservicesprovidedamongallsupportdepartments.Reciprocalmethodfullyincorporatesinterdepartmentalrelationshipsintothesupport-departmentcostallocation.Itisalsoknownasthematrixmethod.Analternativewaytoimplementthereciprocalmethodistoformulateandsolvelinearequations.Thisimplementationrequiresthreesteps.ReciprocalAllocationMethod(RepeatedIterations)ExampleExhibit16.6ReciprocalMethodofAllocatingSupport-DepartmentCostsUsingRepeatedIterationsatRobinsonCompanyReciprocalAllocationMethod(LinearEquations)Thereciprocalmethodcanalsobeimplementedbyformulatingandsolvinglinearequations.Thisprocessrequiresthreesteps:Expresssupportdepartmentbudgetedcostsandreciprocalrelationshipsintheformoflinearequations.Solvethesetoflinearequationstoobtainthecompletereciprocatedbudgetedcostsofeachsupportdepartment.Allocatethecompletereciprocatedcostsofeachsupportdepartmenttoallotherdepartmentsonthebasisofthebudgetedusagepercentages.ReciprocalAllocationMethod(LinearEquations)IllustratedExhibit16.7ReciprocalMethodofAllocatingSupport-DepartmentCostsUsingLinearEquationsatRobinsonCompanyReciprocalAllocationMethod(LinearEquations)ExampleExhibit16.7ReciprocalMethodofAllocatingSupport-DepartmentCostsUsingLinearEquationsatRobinsonCompanyOverviewofMethodsDifferencesamongthethreemethods’allocationsincreaseasthemagnitudeofthereciprocalallocationsincreasesandasthedifferencesacrossoperatingdepartments’usageofeachsupportdepartment’sservicesincrease.Reciprocalisconceptuallythemostprecisebecauseitconsidersthemutualservicesprovidedamongallsupportdepartments.Directandstep-downaresimpletocomputeandunderstand.Directmethodiswidelyused,butascomputingpowertoperformrepeatediterationsincreases,morecompaniesfindthereciprocalmethodeasiertoimplement.AllocatingCommonCostsCommoncost—thecostofoperatingafacility,activity,orcostobjectwhenthatfacility,activity,orcostobjectissharedbytwoormoreusersCommoncostsarisebecauseeachuserincursalowercostbysharingafacilityoractivitythanoperatingthefacilityorperformingtheactivityindependently.Thecostaccountingchallengeishowtoallocatecommoncoststoeachuserinareasonableway.Weusetwodifferentmethodstoallocatecommoncosts.MethodsofAllocatingCommonCosts:Stand-AloneMethodStand-alonecost-allocationmethoddeterminestheweightsforcostallocationbyconsideringeachuserofthecommoncostfacilityoractivityasaseparateentity.Individualcostsareaddedtogether,andallocationpercentagesarecalculatedfromthewholeandappliedtothecommoncost.MethodsofAllocatingCommonCosts:IncrementalCost-AllocationMethodIncrementalcost-allocationmethodrankstheindividualusersofacostobjectintheorderofusersmostresponsibleforthecommoncostandthenusesthisrankingtoallocatethecostamongtheusers.Thefirst-rankeduseristheprimaryuserandisallocatedcostsuptothecostsasastand-aloneuser(typicallygetsthehighestallocationofthecommoncosts).Thesecond-rankeduseristhefirstincrementaluserandisallocatedtheadditionalcostthatarisesfromtwousersratherthanone.Subsequentusersarehandledinthesamemannerasthesecond-rankeduser.CostAllocationsandContractDisputes(1of2)TheU.S.governmentreimbursesmostcontractorsinoneoftwomainways:Thecontractorispaidasetpricewithoutanalysisofactualcontractcostdata.Thecontractorispaidafterananalysisofactualcontractcostdata.Insomecases,thecontractwillstatethatthereimbursementamountisbasedonactualallowablecostsplusafixedfee(cost-pluscontract).AllcontractswithU.S.governmentagenciesmustcomplywithcostaccountingstandardsissuedbytheCostAccountingStandardsBoard(CASB).CostAllocationsandContractDisputes(2of2)TheCASBhastheexclusiveauthoritytomake,putintoeffect,amend,andrescindcostaccountingstandardsandinterpretations.Thestandardsaredesignedtoachieveuniformityandconsistencyinthemeasurement,assignment,andallocationofcoststogovernmentcontractswithintheUnitedStates.Thestandardsrepresentthecomplexinterplayofpoliticalconsiderationsandaccountingprinciples.Termssuchasfairnessandequity,aswellascauseandeffectandbenefitsreceived,arerelevanttoandapartofgovernmentcontracts.BundledProductsandRevenueAllocationMethods(1of2)Revenuesareinflowsofassetscompaniesreceiveforproductsorservicesprovidedtocustomers.RevenueallocationoccurswhenrevenuesarerelatedtoaparticularREVENUEOBJECTbutcannotbetracedtoitinaneconomicallyfeasible(cost-effective)way.Revenueobject—anythingforwhichaseparatemeasurementofrevenueisdesiredBundledProductsandRevenueAllocationMethods(2of2)Bundledproduct—apackageoftwoormoreproductsorservicesthatissoldforasingleprice,butwhoseindividualcomponentsmaybesoldasseparateitemsattheirown“stand-alone”price

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论