应用文写作-关于写作课同桌互评模式的反馈与建议讲义-浙江省杭州地区(含周边)重点中学2024-2025学年高二上学期11月期中英语试题

应用文写作假定你是李华，为了让学生参与到评价过程中，外教Ryan在写作课上要求同桌互评作文，你认为这样的模式存在问题。请你给外教写一封邮件，内容包括：1.

说明问题；2.

提出建议。注意：1.

写作词数应为80左右；2.

请按如下格式在答题纸的相应位置作答。DearRyan,I’mLiHuafromClass3.__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Yours,LiHua一、写作提纲第一段：表明写信目的礼貌地向外教Ryan提及写作课上同桌互评作文模式，并引出存在问题这一话题。第二段：阐述存在的问题指出学生能力有限，可能无法准确评判作文质量，如语法错误识别不全、对写作思路和逻辑的评估不准确。说明可能存在主观偏见，影响评价的公正性，比如因个人关系亲疏而给出有失偏颇的分数或评价。提及可能导致学生过于关注他人评价，忽视自身写作的提升和自我反思。第三段：提出建议建议教师先给予详细的评价标准和示例，让学生有章可循。提出可以采用小组互评与教师点评相结合的方式，综合多方意见，提高评价的准确性和全面性。倡导鼓励学生在互评后进行自我总结和反思，以促进自身写作能力的发展。二、语言积累“I'mwritingtosharemythoughtsaboutthepeerevaluationmodelinourwritingclass.”（我写信是想分享我对写作课上同桌互评模式的看法。）“Oneofthemainproblemsisthatstudentsmaynothavethesufficientabilitytoassessthequalityofpositionsaccurately.”（主要问题之一是学生可能没有足够的能力准确评估作文质量。）“Theymightoverlooksomegrammarmistakesorfailtounderstandthedeeperlogicandstructureofthewriting.”（他们可能会忽略一些语法错误或无法理解写作更深层次的逻辑和结构。）“Subjectivebiasesarealsolikelytooccur,whichwillaffectthefairnessoftheevaluation.”（主观偏见也很可能出现，这会影响评价的公正性。）“Forexample,studentsmightgivehigherorlowerscoresduetopersonalrelationshipsratherthantheactualqualityofthewriting.”（例如，学生可能会因为个人关系而给出较高或较低的分数，而不是基于写作的实际质量。）“Moreover,thismodelmaycausestudentstofocustoomuchonothers'evaluationsandneglecttheirownselfreflectionandimprovement.”（此外，这种模式可能会导致学生过于关注他人的评价，而忽视自身的自我反思和提高。）“Toaddresstheseissues,itwouldbebeneficialifyoucouldprovidedetailedevaluationcriteriaandexamplesinadvance.”（为了解决这些问题，如果您能提前提供详细的评价标准和示例，将会很有帮助。）“Abinationofgroupevaluationandteacher'sfeedbackcouldalsobeconsideredtoensureamoreprehensiveandaccurateassessment.”（也可以考虑采用小组评价和教师反馈相结合的方式，以确保更全面和准确的评估。）“Afterthepeerevaluation,studentsshouldbeencouragedtosummarizeandreflectontheirownwritingtoenhancetheirwritingskills.”（在同桌互评之后，应该鼓励学生总结并反思自己的写作，以提高他们的写作技能。）“Ihopethesesuggestionswillbehelpfulforimprovingourwritingclass.”（我希望这些建议将有助于改进我们的写作课。）三、写作示范第一篇DearRyan,

I’mLiHuafromClass3.I'mwritingtosharemythoughtsaboutthepeerevaluationmodelinourwritingclass.Oneofthemainproblemsisthatstudentsmaynothavethesufficientabilitytoassessthequalityofpositionsaccurately.Theymightoverlooksomegrammarmistakesorfailtounderstandthedeeperlogicandstructureofthewriting.Subjectivebiasesarealsolikelytooccur,whichwillaffectthefairnessoftheevaluation.Forexample,studentsmightgivehigherorlowerscoresduetopersonalrelationshipsratherthantheactualqualityofthewriting.Moreover,thismodelmaycausestudentstofocustoomuchonothers'evaluationsandneglecttheirownselfreflectionandimprovement.Toaddresstheseissues,itwouldbebeneficialifyoucouldprovidedetailedevaluationcriteriaandexamplesinadvance.Abinationofgroupevaluationandteacher'sfeedbackcouldalsobeconsideredtoensureamoreprehensiveandaccurateassessment.Afterthepeerevaluation,studentsshouldbeencouragedtosummarizeandreflectontheirownwritingtoenhancetheirwritingskills.Yours,

LiHua第二篇DearRyan,

I’mLiHuafromClass3.Iwouldliketoexpressmyconcernsregardingthepeerassessmentmethodinthewritingclass.Theissueisthatstudents'capabilitiesinevaluatingessaysareoftenlimited.Theymaynotbeabletodetectalltheflawsingrammarandsyntax.Also,personalpreferencesandfriendshipsmightinfluencetheirjudgments,leadingtounfairresults.Additionally,studentsmightbeeoverlydependentonothers'opinionsandlosesightoftheirownwritinggrowth.Mysuggestionsareasfollows.Firstly,youcouldofferaclearrubricandsamplewritingsforstudentstofollow.Secondly,insteadofjustpeerevaluation,amixedapproachofgroupandteacherevaluationcouldbeadopted.Finally,studentsshouldbeurgedtothinkabouttheirownwritingaftertheevaluationprocess.Yours,

LiHua第三篇DearRyan,

I’mLiHuafromClass3.I'mwritingtodiscussthepeerevaluationactivityinourwritinglessons.Thereareseveraldrawbacks.Studentsmaylacktheexpertisetoproperlyevaluatewriting.Theycouldmisjudgethecoherenceandcreativityofanessay.Biasisanotherfactor,asstudentsmightfavortheirfriends'workorbetoocriticalofothers.Thiscanalsomakestudentsmoreconcernedaboutpleasingtheirpeersratherthanimprovingtheirwriting.Toimprovethesituation,youcoulddistributeguidelinesforevaluationbeforestarting.Considerhavingsmallgroupsevaluatetogetherandthentheteacherreview.Encouragestudentstowritedowntheirownthoughtsabouttheirwritingafterthepeerreview.Yours,

LiHua【答案】DearRyan,I’mLiHuafromClass3.Wereallyappreciateyourefforttoengagestudentsintheevaluationprocess.However,I’mafraidthatpeerassessmentmightbeproblematic,forsomemaylacktheabilitytoprovideconstructivefeedback,leadingtomisunderstandingsordemotivation.Tofacilitateaneffectiv